Changing Trends in Cleft Lip and Palate Management Taught in Training Programs in Korea

Between unity and disparity: current treatment protocols for common orofacial clefts in European expert centres

There is considerable variability in the management of common orofacial clefts across Europe, reflecting differing opinions on optimal treatments. An updated overview of treatment protocols for orofacial clefts across 26 expert centres in the European Reference Network CRANIO is presented here. A structured questionnaire was distributed to map the surgical protocol and additional standard procedures for cleft palate (CP), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). A surgical protocol was defined as the unique combination of a sequence of standard surgeries, their timing, and the surgical techniques employed. Overall, 33 unique surgical protocols for CP, 54 for UCLP, and 51 for BCLP were identified. Notable findings included the trend towards early hard palate closure, uniform timing of lip closure, and the popularity of primary cleft rhinoplasty. Nevertheless, practice variations were most pronounced in the timing of alveolar closure, the number of standard surgeries, and the application of additional standard procedures. This study highlights the diversity of treatment protocols across Europe, despite considerable convergence of treatment practices over time. To allow for further convergence, establishing objective criteria for protocol selection, adequate documentation of customizations, and consensus on the terminology of surgical techniques, are necessary.

Regional variations in cleft lip and palate repair techniques: A mixed-methods study of international volunteer surgeons

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of multitudes of surgical techniques for cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) repair, the geographic distribution of their usage remains largely unknown. We investigated the technical preferences in CLP repair within an international cohort of volunteer surgeons.

METHODS

This was a mixed-methods study. A retrospective review of patients with CLP treated within the Operation Smile programs between 2021-2024 was conducted. Clinical records were reviewed for operative techniques. Surgeons who did not specify their technique were then surveyed to elicit specific preferences.

RESULTS

In total, 888 patients with CLP were included. Among them, 375 underwent primary unilateral cleft lip (UCL) repair (42.2%), 102 bilateral cleft lip (BCL) repair (11.5%), and 411 cleft palate (CP) repair (46.3%). The most frequently performed surgical techniques were the Fisher repair for UCL, Mulliken repair for BCL, and Bardach for CP. Regarding UCL and BCL techniques, no significant differences in preference were found between high-income country (HIC) and low-and middle-income country (LMIC) surgeons. For CP repair, the von Langenbeck technique was preferred by LMIC surgeons (44.7%), whereas the Bardach technique was preferred by HIC surgeons (57.6%) (p = 0.03). Novel modifications were reported 3 times for UCL repair, 7 times for BCL repair, and once for CP repair.

CONCLUSION

Our study was the first to document the global variations in CLP techniques. Most HIC and LMIC surgeons prefer the Fisher repair for UCL. For CP repair, the HIC surgeons prefer the Bardach technique, while LMIC surgeons prefer the von Langenbeck technique. A concerted effort to transmit knowledge across borders is essential for continued technical innovation.

Outcomes of Primary Palatoplasty: An Analysis Using the Pediatric Health Information System Database

BACKGROUND

Previous attempts at reporting oronasal fistula development and secondary speech surgery following cleft palate surgery have been limited to single-center case series. This limitation can be overcome by querying large databases created by health care governing bodies or health care alliances. The authors examined the effect of cleft type and demographic variables on the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the Pediatric Health Information System database were queried for patients, aged 6 to 18 months, who had undergone primary palatoplasty between 2004 and 2009. Subsequent repair of an oronasal fistula and/or secondary speech surgery between 2004 and 2015 was identified by procedure codes. Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between cleft type with oronasal fistula and with secondary speech surgery.

RESULTS

Seven thousand three hundred twenty-five patients were identified, and 6.4 percent (n = 468) had a subsequent repair of an oronasal fistula and 18.5 percent (n = 1355) had a secondary speech operation. Adjusted for age, sex, and race, patients with cleft lip and palate have increased odds of oronasal fistula (OR, 5.60; 95 percent CI, 4.44 to 7.07) and secondary speech surgery (OR, 2.32; 95 percent CI, 2.05 to 2.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a large, multi-institution billing database, the authors were able to estimate the prevalence of oronasal fistula and surgically treated velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary palatoplasty in the United States. In addition, the authors demonstrated that patients with isolated cleft palate develop fewer oronasal fistulas and require less secondary speech surgery than patients with cleft lip and palate.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Prevalence, demographics, and complications of cleft palate surgery

INTRODUCTION

Current published data on the demographics of cleft lip and palate is sparse and differs intranationally in reported incidence, demographics, and complication rates, making accurate local data both valuable and useful. We investigate the prevalence, demographics, and complications of cleft palate correction surgery in the inpatient setting over a 15-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of The California Hospital Discharge Data sets of all pediatric patients who underwent cleft palate repair or cleft palate revision from 1997 to 2011. Children's hospitals (CHs) were analyzed as a separate group. For each record, age, gender, ethnicity, length of stay, total charges, principal payer, complications, and disposition were analyzed.

RESULTS

10,450 correction surgeries were performed during 1997-2011. This was an annual case-volume of 697 and annual population-adjusted rate of 2.0, neither of which changed over time (p=0.9 and 0.06, respectively). Of all surgeries, 21.5% were revisions, 48.3% were performed in CHs, 56.2% were performed on males, and 65.5% were performed on Caucasians. The median length of stay was 1 day, which did not change over time (p=1.0). The median total charges increased from $9.074 to $35,643 over the studied period (p<0.001). Admission to CHs was associated with shorter stay (1-3 days vs. 1-4 days) and higher total charges ($15,560 vs. $13,242; both p<0.001). Complications occurred in 393 (3.8%) of the surgeries. This percentage did not change over time (p=0.2). The most common complication was fistula/abscess/infection, which occurred in 159 cases (1.5%). Respiratory complications requiring ventilation occurred 66 cases (0.6%). Complications were more common in CHs (4.8% vs. 2.8%; p<0.001). Mortality rate was <0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study constitutes the entire surgical cohort within a state, allowing for an accurate representation of the true perioperative complication rate of these procedures. The prevalence, demographics, and outcomes of the cleft palate correction surgery have remained unchanged during 1997-2011. Collectively, our data suggest that primary and secondary palatoplasty present low perioperative risk.

Preliminary study of Korean orthodontic residents' current concepts and knowledge of cleft lip and palate management

OBJECTIVE

A national survey was conducted to assess orthodontic residents' current concepts and knowledge of cleft lip and palate (CLP) management in Korea.

METHODS

A questionnaire consisting of 7 categories and 36 question items was distributed to 16 senior chief residents of orthodontic department at 11 dental university hospitals and 5 medical university hospitals in Korea. All respondents completed the questionnaires and returned them.

RESULTS

All of the respondents reported that they belonged to an interdisciplinary team. Nineteen percent indicated that they use presurgical infant orthopedic (PSIO) appliances. The percentage of respondents who reported they were 'unsure' about the methods about for cleft repair operation method was relatively high. Eighty-six percent reported that the orthodontic treatment was started at the deciduous or mixed dentition. Various answers were given regarding the amount of maxillary expansion for alveolar bone graft and the estimates of spontaneous or forced eruption of the upper canine. Sixty-seven percent reported use of a rapid maxillary expansion appliance as an anchorage device for maxillary protraction with a facemask. There was consensus among respondents regarding daily wearing time, duration of treatment, and amount of orthopedic force. Various estimates were given for the relapse percentage after maxillary advancement distraction osteogenesis (MADO). Most respondents did not have sufficient experience with MADO.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that education about the concepts and methods of PSIO and surgical repair, consensus regarding orthodontic management protocols, and additional MADO experience are needed in order to improve the quality of CLP management in Korean orthodontic residents.