Oral Mucocutaneous Diseases: Clinicopathologic Analysis and Malignant Transformation

An Evidence-Based Update on the Potential for Malignancy of Oral Lichen Planus and Related Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and a meta-analysis is presented on published articles on the malignant transformation of oral lichen planus (OLP) and related conditions, which, based on current evidence, updates an earlier systematic review published by our research group that included publications until November 2018. In this updated study (Nov-2023) we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. We evaluated the methodological quality of studies (QUIPS tool) and carried out meta-analyses. The inclusion criteria were met by 101 studies (38,083 patients), of which, 20 new primary-level studies (11,512 patients) were published in the last 5 years and were added to our updated study. The pooled malignant transformation ratio was 1.43% (95% CI = 1.09-1.80) for OLP; 1.38% (95% CI = 0.16-3.38) for oral lichenoid lesions; 1.20% (95% CI = 0.00-4.25) for lichenoid reactions; and 5.13% (95% CI = 1.90-9.43) for OLP with dysplasia. No significant differences were found between the OLL or LR groups and the OLP subgroup (p = 0.853 and p = 0.328, respectively), and the malignant transformation was significantly higher for the OLP with dysplasia group in comparison with the OLP group (p = 0.001). The factors that had a significant impact with a higher risk of malignant transformation were the presence of epithelial dysplasia, a higher methodological quality, the consumption of tobacco and alcohol, the location of lesions on the tongue, the presence of atrophic and erosive lesions, and infection by the hepatitis C virus. In conclusion, OLP behaves as an oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD), whose malignancy ratio is probably underestimated as a consequence essentially of the use of inadequate diagnostic criteria and the low methodological quality of the studies on the subject.

A Novel Approach to Differentiating Erosive and Reticular Lichen Planus Based on the Percentage of Dental Surfaces With Metal Restorations

Introduction Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid reaction (OLR) constitute clinical entities with strong but unclear etiologic relation to dental materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate a correlation between the clinical form of OLP/OLR and the number of dental metal restorations in the oral cavity thus utilizing an exposure to metal (EM) index.  Material and methods The study type is experimental, and the study design is characterized as semiquantitative research that belongs to the branch of experimental research. Twenty-nine patients were chosen based on clinical (either reticular or erosive clinical forms) and histologic findings suggestive of OLP/OLR. The files of patients were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Oral Medicine/Pathology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, during the period 2009-2019. The medical history of the patients did not include any disorder or medication associated with lichenoid lesions and the measurements took place concurrently with the establishment of the diagnosis, thus no treatment for the lichen planus had been administered prior to the measurements. Quantitative measurement of the percentage of dental surfaces restored through metal restorations and correlation with the clinical and histologic findings of OLP/OLR was evaluated. The EM index was evaluated on a scale of 1-3, which corresponds to the percentage of dental surfaces restored through metal restorations. The statistical analysis was performed with the Pearson chi-square test and the significance level was set at p≤0.05. Results The EM index was measured by dividing each tooth into five surfaces (occlusal, mesial, distal, buccal, lingual), subsequently multiplying the number of available teeth with the number 5 to calculate the total number of surfaces, and then counting the number of surfaces with metal restorations - both fillings and crowns (in case of metal-ceramic crowns, the respective dental surface is taken into account only in case of macroscopically exposed metal), dividing the number of surfaces with metal restorations with the total number of surfaces and multiply by 100 so that the results take the form of percentages (%) and finally classifying the percentages into three groups: 1: 0% metal restorations, 2: 1-25% metal restorations, 3: >26% metal restorations). The percentage in female patients ranged from 0% to 100%, whereas it ranged from 0% to 60% in male patients. According to the clinical form of the lichenoid lesion, the percentage ranged from 0% to 60% in reticular lichen planus cases and from 0% to 100% in erosive lichen planus cases. There was no statistical difference between lichen planus cases, in total, and in normal oral epithelium. However, the levels of EM were marginally similar between the reticular lichen planus and the erosive lichen planus (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.056). Therefore, it may be the case that the EM index is higher in erosive lichenoid lesions. Conclusion In our study, the EM index was higher in female patients and in erosive lichenoid lesions. These findings should be tested and supported by larger samples of patients since the aforementioned Fisher's Exact Test, p = 0.056 could fall below the threshold of 0.05 if more patients were included. This is the first attempt to establish a novel approach to differentiating erosive and reticular lichen planus based on the percentage of dental surfaces with metal restorations.

Rate of Malignant Transformation Differs Based on Diagnostic Criteria for Oral Lichenoid Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 24,277 Patients

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the evidence on the malignant potential of oral lichenoid conditions (OLCs) including oral lichen planus (OLP), oral lichenoid lesions (OLL), and lichenoid mucositis dysplasia (LMD). In addition, it aims to compare the rate of malignant transformation (MT) in OLP patients diagnosed according to different diagnostic criteria, and to investigate the possible risk factors for OLP MT into OSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standardized search strategy was applied across four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus). Screening, identification and reporting followed the PRISMA framework. Data on MT were calculated as a pooled proportion (PP), subgroup analyses and possible risk factors for MT were pooled as odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Among 54 studies with 24,277 patients, the PP for OLCs MT was 1.07% (95% CI [0.82, 1.32]). The estimated MT rate for OLP, OLL and LMD was 0.94%, 1.95% and 6.31%, respectively. The PP OLP MT rate using the 2003 modified WHO criteria group was lower than that using the non-2003 criteria (0.86%; 95% CI [0.51, 1.22] versus 1.01%; 95% CI [0.67, 1.35]). A higher odds ratio of MT was observed for red OLP lesions (OR = 3.52; 95% CI [2.20, 5.64]), smokers (OR = 1.79; 95% CI [1.02, 3.03]), alcohol consumers (OR = 3.27, 95% CI [1.11, 9.64]) and those infected with HCV (OR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.58, 4.13]), compared to those without these risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

OLP and OLL carry a low risk of developing OSCC. MT rates differed based on diagnostic criteria. A higher odds ratio of MT was observed among red OLP lesions, smokers, alcohol consumers, and HCV-positive patients. These findings have implications for practice and policies.

Dysplasia in oral lichen planus: relevance, controversies and challenges. A position paper

Background

Patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) have an increased risk of oral cancer. For this reason, OLP is classified as an oral potentially malignant disorder. However, the precise personal (or individual) risk is unknown. Recent meta-analytical studies have reported that dysplastic OLP may transform to cancer in around 6% of cases, while the rate of transformation is lower (<1.5%) in non-dysplastic cases. The presence of epithelial dysplasia has emerged as the most powerful indicator for assessing cancer risk in oral potentially malignant disorders in routine practice. However, the general acceptance of epithelial dysplasia as an accompanying histologic feature in OLP is subject to great controversy. Many pathologists consider the presence of dysplasia as a criterion to exclude OLP when routinely reporting on this disease. This practice, widespread among oral pathology professionals, has resulted in the underestimation of the potential for malignancy of OLP.

Material and Methods

A review of the literature was carried out in order to critically analyze the relevance, controversies and challenges encountered across the diagnosis of epithelial dysplasia in OLP.

Results

12 studies have been published examining dysplastic changes in OLP, reporting Figures ranging from 0.54% to 25% of cases with dysplasia in the first diagnostic biopsy. The diagnosis of dysplasia in the OLP poses an additional difficulty due to the fact that the affected oral epithelium per se develops changes related to autoimmune aggression. Among the most frequent histological features of OLP that develops dysplasia are basal cell hyperplasia with basaloid appearance, loss of basal cells polarity, cellular and nuclear pleomorphism and irregular stratification.

Conclusions

Epithelial dysplasia should not be considered an exclusion criterion for OLP; its evaluation requires experienced pathologists in this field.

Key words:Oral lichen planus, epithelial dysplasia, oral cancer.

Malignant transformation risk of oral lichen planus: A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate current evidence on the malignant transformation of oral lichen planus (OLP), oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs), and oral lichenoid reactions (LRs) and to determine the variables with greatest influence on cancer development.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published before November 2018. We evaluated the quality of studies (QUIPS tool). We carried out meta-analyses to fulfill our objectives. We examined the between-study heterogeneity and small-study effects, and conducted sensitivity studies and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 82 studies (26,742 patients. The combined malignant transformation rate was 1.14% for OLP (95% CI = 0.84-1.49), 1.88% for OLLs (95% CI = 0.15-4.95) and 1.71% for LRs (95% CI = 0.00-5.46). Subgroup analysis revealed a higher malignant transformation rate in studies when the presence of epithelial dysplasia was not an exclusion criterion (p = 0.001), when both clinical and histopathological criteria were used for diagnosis (p < 0.001), when the follow-up was at least 12 months (p = 0.048), and when there was lower risk of potential bias (p = 0.002). Malignant transformation risk factors were: tongue localization (RR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.21-2.74, p = 0.004), presence of atrophic-erosive lesions (RR = 4.09, 95% CI = 2.40-6.98, p < 0.001), tobacco use (RR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.28-3.05, p = 0.002), alcohol consumption (RR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.14-4.56, p = 0.02), and hepatitis C virus infection (RR = 4.46, 95% CI = 0.98-20.22, p = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

The malignant transformation rates of OLP, OLLs and LRs are underestimated due essentially to restrictive diagnostic criteria, inadequate follow-up periods, and/or low quality of studies.

Role of mammary serine protease inhibitor on the inflammatory response in oral lichen planus

OBJECTIVES

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory condition with an unclear pathological mechanism. IκB kinase α (IKKα)-regulated mammary serine protease inhibitor (MASPIN) has been shown to mediate inflammation, particularly in cancers. Here, we explored the expression of MASPIN in OLP and its role in the inflammatory response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemistry staining and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays were used to detect the subcellular localization and expression of MASPIN and IKKα in OLP and healthy control tissues. Levels of the inflammatory factors were compared with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. MASPIN and IKKα were overexpressed and silenced, respectively, in an inflammation model of human oral keratinocytes (HOKs) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

RESULTS

Mammary serine protease inhibitor expression was down-regulated, whereas IKKα expression was up-regulated in OLP tissues (p < 0.01). The levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in OLP tissues were increased compared to those of healthy controls (p < 0.01). MASPIN overexpression in LPS-stimulated HOK cells inhibited the levels of IKKα and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. By contrast, IKKα silencing promoted the expression of MASPIN and inhibited the secretion of inflammatory cytokines.

CONCLUSION

Both MASPIN and IKKα are involved in the inflammatory process of OLP, suggesting potential therapeutic targets.

Rate of malignant transformation of oral lichen planus: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine: (a) the malignant transformation rate (TR) of oral lichen planus (OLP) and its risk factors; (b) whether or not oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) have a different malignant TR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were used as search engines: only observational, full-length, English language studies were investigated. PRISMA protocol was used to evaluate and present results. PROSPERO registration code is CRD42016048529.

RESULTS

Among 7,429 records screened, only 21 were included in this review. Ninety-two of 6,559 patients developed oral squamous cell carcinoma, with an overall TR of 1.40% (1.37% for OLP and 2.43% for OLL), an annual TR of 0.20%. Female gender, red clinical forms, and tongue site seem to slightly increase the transformation risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review confirms that both OLP and OLL, the latter with a slightly higher TR, may be considered potentially malignant disorders and suggest that erosive type, female gender and tongue site should be considered as risk factors for OLP transformation. Major efforts should be done to establish strict clinical and histological criteria to diagnose OLP and to perform sounder methodological observational studies.

In situ delivery of corticosteroids for treatment of oral diseases

In many mucocutaneous disorders, corticosteroids therapy is currently central. Systemic therapy is restricted to severe disorders whereas topical applications are considered as the first-line treatment. The oral cavity environment, the medication form and other factors related to the delivery method are key factors for the therapy efficiency and effectiveness. Current marketed medications are not able to avoid wrong drug exposure and scarce patients' compliance. Innovative in situ delivery systems are able to prolong the drug retention time on the mucosa and to avoid the drawbacks of conventional formulations. This review is intended to give a general overview of oral mucocutaneous pathologies and highlight the potential of new technologies in designing innovative delivery systems able to release corticosteroids in situ for the treatment of various oral cavity disorders.

Oral mucosal manifestations of autoimmune skin diseases

A group of autoimmune diseases is characterised by autoantibodies against epithelial adhesion structures and/or tissue-tropic lymphocytes driving inflammatory processes resulting in specific pathology at the mucosal surfaces and the skin. The most frequent site of mucosal involvement in autoimmune diseases is the oral cavity. Broadly, these diseases include conditions affecting the cell-cell adhesion causing intra-epithelial blistering and those where autoantibodies or infiltration lymphocytes cause a loss of cell-matrix adhesion or interface inflammation. Clinically, patients present with blistering, erosions and ulcers that may affect the skin as well as further mucosal surfaces of the eyes, nose and genitalia. While the autoimmune disease may be suspected based on clinical manifestations, demonstration of tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies, or lymphocytic infiltrates, by various methods including histological examination, direct and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, immunoblotting and quantitative immunoassay is a prerequisite for definitive diagnosis. Given the frequency of oral involvement and the fact that oral mucosa is the initially affected site in many cases, the informed practitioner should be well acquainted with diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of autoimmune dermatosis with oral involvement. This paper reviews the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of these conditions in the oral cavity with a specific emphasis on their differential diagnosis and current management approaches.