DARBEPOETIN α, A LONG-ACTING ERYTHROPOEITIN DERIVATE, DOES NOT ALTER LPS EVOKED MYOCARDIAL DEPRESSION AND GENE EXPRESSION OF BAX, BCL-XS, BCL-XL, BCL-2, AND TNF-α

Functional EpoR pathway utilization is not detected in primary tumor cells isolated from human breast, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and ovarian tumor tissues

Several clinical trials in oncology have reported increased mortality or disease progression associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. One hypothesis proposes that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents directly stimulate tumor proliferation and/or survival through cell-surface receptors. To test this hypothesis and examine if human tumors utilize the erythropoietin receptor pathway, the response of tumor cells to human recombinant erythropoietin was investigated in disaggregated tumor cells obtained from 186 patients with colorectal, breast, lung, ovarian, head and neck, and other tumors. A cocktail of well characterized tumor growth factors (EGF, HGF, and IGF-1) were analyzed in parallel as a positive control to determine whether freshly-isolated tumor cells were able to respond to growth factor activation ex vivo. Exposing tumor cells to the growth factor cocktail resulted in stimulation of survival and proliferation pathways as measured by an increase in phosphorylation of the downstream signaling proteins AKT and ERK. In contrast, no activation by human recombinant erythropoietin was observed in isolated tumor cells. Though tumor samples exhibited a broad range of cell-surface expression of EGFR, c-Met, and IGF-1R, no cell-surface erythropoietin receptor was detected in tumor cells from the 186 tumors examined (by flow cytometry or Western blot). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents did not act directly upon isolated tumor cells to stimulate pathways known to promote proliferation or survival of human tumor cells isolated from primary and metastatic tumor tissues.

Protective effects of erythropoietin on endotoxin-related organ injury in rats

The protective effect of erythropoietin (EPO) on tissues following ischemia and reperfusion injuries remains poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the effect of EPO in preventing endotoxin-induced organ damage. Rat model of multiple organ failure (MOF) was established by tail vein injection of 10 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Recombinant human EPO treatment (5000 U/kg) was administered by tail vein injection at 30 min after LPS challenge. Twenty-four h after EPO treatment, changes in serum enzyme levels, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr), were evaluated by biochemical analysis. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined by using immunoradiometric assay. Histological examination of tissue sections was carried out by hematoxylin and eosin staining, while ultrastructure evaluation of organ tissues was assessed by transmission electron microscopy. Protein expression levels were detected by using Western blotting. EPO treatment showed a modest effect in preventing LPS-induced elevation of AST, ALT, BUN, Cr, and TNF-α levels, and in protecting against LPS-induced tissue degeneration and injured ultrastructure in the lung, liver, and kidney. Moreover, LPS promoted phosphorylation of alanine aminotransferase (AKT) and increased nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation in the lung, liver, and kidney (P<0.05 vs. control). However, EPO treatment significantly decreased the LPS-induced pAKT up-regulation in these tissues (P<0.05 vs. LPS treatment alone). The present study demonstrates that EPO may play a protective role against LPS-induced MOF by reducing the inflammatory response and tissue degeneration, possibly via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT and NF-κB signaling pathways.

The effect of erythropoietin on normal and neoplastic cells

Erythropoietin (Epo) is an essential hormone that binds and activates the Epo receptor (EpoR) resident on the surface of erythroid progenitor cells, thereby promoting erythropoiesis. Recombinant human erythropoietin has been used successfully for over 20 years to treat anemia in millions of patients. In addition to erythropoiesis, Epo has also been reported to have other effects, such as tissue protection and promotion of tumor cell growth or survival. This became of significant concern in 2003, when some clinical trials in cancer patients reported increased tumor progression and worse survival outcomes in patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). One of the potential mechanisms proffered to explain the observed safety issues was that functional EpoR was expressed in tumors and/or endothelial cells, and that ESAs directly stimulated tumor growth and/or antagonized tumor ablative therapies. Since then, numerous groups have performed further research evaluating this potential mechanism with conflicting data and conclusions. Here, we review the biology of endogenous Epo and EpoR expression and function in erythropoiesis, and evaluate the evidence pertaining to the expression of EpoR on normal nonhematopoietic and tumor cells.

Improved cerebrovascular function and reduced histological damage with darbepoietin alfa administration after cortical impact injury in rats

Darbepoetin alfa (darbEpo) is an erythropoietic glycoprotein that activates the erythropoietin receptor. The aim of our study was to determine whether darbEpo is neuroprotective in a cortical impact injury (CII) model and to determine the characteristics of dose response and time window. To better understand the vascular mechanism of darbEpo neuroprotection, the reactivity of cerebral blood flow (CBF) to l-arginine administration was also studied. Rats were given saline or darbEpo from 2.5 to 50 μg/kg at 5 min after CII or a dose of 25 μg/kg darbEpo at times ranging from 5 min to 24 h after CII. Histological assessment was determined 2 weeks after a severe CII. Other rats were given either darbEpo (25 μg/kg) or saline daily for 3 days before injury. Five minutes after severe CII, they were given either l-arginine or d-arginine. Hemodynamic variables were monitored for 2 h after injury. In the dose-response study, darbEpo in doses of 25 and 50 μg/kg significantly reduced contusion volume from 39.1 ± 6.7 to 8.1 ± 3.1 and 11.2 ± 6.0 mm(3), respectively. In the time window study, darbEpo reduced contusion volume when given in a dose of 25 μg/kg at 5 min to 6 h after the impact injury. In animals pretreated with darbEpo, the CBF response to l-arginine was significantly greater than in the animals pretreated with saline. These data demonstrate that darbEpo has neuroprotective effects in traumatic brain injury in a dose- and time-dependent manner and that vascular effects of darbEpo may have a role in neuroprotection.

Functional erythropoietin receptor is undetectable in endothelial, cardiac, neuronal, and renal cells

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) have been reported to activate erythropoietin receptors (EpoR) on cell types, including endothelial, neuronal, renal tubule, and cardiac cells. ESAs have also been reported to promote angiogenesis. However, those findings are controversial and confounded by methodologic issues. We show that EpoR mRNA was detected in essentially all cell types examined, including primary human endothelial, renal, cardiac, and neuronal cells but 10- to 100-fold lower than Epo-responsive cells using quantitative reverse-transcribed polymerase chain reaction. Total endothelial EpoR protein examined using a new monoclonal antibody was low to undetectable. Surface EpoR on endothelial cells was not detected using [(125)I]-rHuEpo surface-binding studies. There was no evidence of ESA-induced intracellular signaling in endothelial cells. There was a similar lack of EpoR expression and signaling in other cell types examined. Experiments were performed examining ESA function on these cells. An in vivo rat corneal angiogenesis assay demonstrated neo-vessel formation in response to recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (rHuVEGF). However, recombinant mouse Epo did not induce vessel formation. Similarly, ESAs did not reproducibly provide cytoprotection to neuronal, renal, or cardiac cells. Taken together, our data challenge the notion of presence or function of EpoR on nonhematopoietic cells, and call into question the preclinical basis for clinical studies exploring direct, "pleiotropic" actions of ESAs.