Screening for occult penetrating cardiac injuries

Point of care ultrasound and sub-xiphoid window reduce uncertainty in the management of potential dual-cavity injuries in patients with torso stab wounds

INTRODUCTION

This paper reviews our experiences with the management of patients with torso stab wounds and potential injuries in both the chest and abdomen over the last decade. The aim of the project is to clarify our approach and provide an evidence base for clinical algorithms. We hypothesize that there is room for our clinical algorithms to be further refined in order to address the diverse, life threatening injuries that can result from stab wounds to the torso.

METHODS

Patients with one or more torso stab wounds, and a potential injury in both the chest and the abdomen were identified from a local database for the period December 2012 to December 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 899 patients were identified. The mean age was 29 years (SD = 9) and 93% of patients were male. Amongst all patients, 686 (76%) underwent plain radiography, 207 (23%) a point of care ultrasound assessment, and 171 (19%) a CT scan. Following initial resuscitation, assessment and investigation, a total of 527 (59%) patients proceeded to surgery. A total of 185 patients (35%) underwent a semi elective diagnostic laparoscopy to exclude an occult diaphragm injury. Of the 342 who underwent an emergency operation, 9 patients (1%) required thoracotomy or sternotomy exclusively, 299 patients (33%) required a laparotomy exclusively and 34 patients (4%) underwent some form of dual cavity exploration. In total, there were 16 deaths, a mortality rate of 2%. The use of laparoscopy, point of care ultrasound and subxiphoid pericardial window increased over the period of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with torso stab wounds and potential injuries above and below the diaphragm are challenging to manage. The highly structured clinical algorithm of the ATLS course should be complemented by the use of point of care ultrasound and sub-xiphoid window to assess the pericardium. These adjuncts reduce the likelihood of negative exploration and incorrect operative sequencing.

Management of Penetrating Cardiac Injuries With Pericardial Window and Drainage in Select Patients

BACKGROUND

Management of penetrating chest injuries with a positive pericardial window (PW) are presumed cardiac injuries and traditionally result in sternotomy. However, there is some evidence in the literature that select patients can be managed with PW, lavage, and drainage (PWLD).

METHODS

All patients with penetrating chest trauma who underwent PW and/or sternotomy over a 5-year period were identified. Patients were stratified by operative intervention [PW + sternotomy vs PWLD] and compared. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of therapeutic sternotomy.

RESULTS

Of the 146 patients who underwent PW and/or sternotomy included in the study, 126 patients underwent PW, 39 underwent sternotomy, and 10 underwent PWLD. There was no difference in demographics, LOS, ICU LOS, vent days, or mortality in patients who underwent PW + sternotomy, compared to patients who underwent PWLD. In the PWLD group, one patient returned to the OR for recurrent pericardial effusion and no patients required sternotomy. Multivariable logistic regression identified ISS as an independent predictor of therapeutic sternotomy (OR 1.160; 95% CI 1.006-1.338, P = .0616). Interestingly, positive FAST, significant CT findings, and trajectory were not predictors of therapeutic sternotomy. There were 7 patients with a left hemothorax and negative FAST found to have a positive PW and cardiac injury mandating sternotomy and repair.

CONCLUSION

Penetrating cardiac injury can be managed with PWLD in select patients. Positive FAST, significant findings on CT, and trajectory do not mandate sternotomy. A negative FAST in the setting of a hemothorax does not rule out a cardiac injury.

Penetrating Cardiac Injuries: Outcome of Treatment from a Level 1 Trauma Centre in South Africa

Background: Penetrating cardiac injuries are rare in South African and international literature. Penetrating cardiac injuries are regarded as one of the most lethal injuries in trauma patients. The mechanism of injury varies across the world. In developing countries, stab wounds cause the majority of penetrating cardiac injuries. These injuries remain clinically challenging and are associated with high mortalities. Aim: To describe our experience with penetrating cardiac injuries and the outcome of their management at a level 1 trauma unit in Johannesburg, South Africa. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who presented with penetrating cardiac injuries over a period of four years (1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019). The patients were identified using the hospital database. The patient’s demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, vital signs, investigation findings, final diagnosis, type of operation, length of hospital stay, morbidities, and mortalities were recorded. Results: There was a total of 167 patients with penetrating cardiac injuries identified. There were 151 (90.4%) males, with an overall median age of 29 years (IQR 24–34). Stab wounds accounted for 77.8% of the injuries, while gunshot wounds (GSW) accounted for 22.2%. The median injury severity score (ISS) and revised trauma score (RTS) were 25 and 7.1, respectively. The right ventricle was the most injured chamber (34.7%), followed by the left ventricle (29.3%), right auricle (13.2%), right atrium (10.2%), and combined injuries accounted for 7% of injuries. A commonly used incision was a sternotomy (51.5%), left anterior-lateral thoracotomy (26.9%), emergency room thoracotomy (19.2%), and clamshell thoracotomy (2.4%). The overall mortality rate was 40.7%, with a 29.2% mortality in the stab wounds. Twenty-four (14.4%) patients died in the emergency department, sixteen (9.6%) patients died on the table in theatre, and the remaining twenty-eight (16.7%) died in the intensive care unit or wards. Gunshot wounds, other associated injuries, right ventricle injuries, a high ISS, low RTS, and low Glasgow coma scale were all significantly more likely to result in death (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Penetrating cardiac injuries are often fatal, but the mortality can be improved with appropriate resuscitation and a work-up. The injuries to the heart can be safely managed by trauma/general surgeons in our setting. The physiology in presentation and other associated injuries determines outcomes in patients with penetrating cardiac injury.

Damage control in penetrating cardiac trauma

Definitive management of hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating cardiac injuries remains controversial between those who propose aggressive invasive care versus those who opt for a less invasive or non-operative approach. This controversy even extends to cases of hemodynamically unstable patients in which damage control surgery is thought to be useful and effective. The aim of this article is to delineate our experience in the surgical management of penetrating cardiac injuries via the creation of a clear and practical algorithm that includes basic principles of damage control surgery. We recommend that all patients with precordial penetrating injuries undergo trans-thoracic ultrasound screening as an integral component of their initial evaluation. In those patients who arrive hemodynamically stable but have a positive ultrasound, a pericardial window with lavage and drainage should follow. We want to emphasize the importance of the pericardial lavage and drainage in the surgical management algorithm of these patients. Before this concept, all positive pericardial windows ended up in an open chest exploration. With the coming of the pericardial lavage and drainage procedure, the reported literature and our experience have shown that 25% of positive pericardial windows do not benefit and/or require further invasive procedures. However, in hemodynamically unstable patients, damage control surgery may still be required to control ongoing bleeding. For this purpose, we propose a surgical management algorithm that includes all of these essential clinical aspects in the care of these patients.

A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for the diagnosis of occult penetrating cardiac injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound (US) compared with a pericardial window (PW) for the diagnosis of occult penetrating cardiac injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma.

METHODS

A literature search in five databases identified relevant articles for inclusion in this SR and MA. Studies were eligible if they evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chest US, compared with a PW, for the diagnosis of occult penetrating cardiac injuries in hemodynamically stable patients presenting with penetrating thoracic trauma. Two investigators independently assessed articles for inclusion and exclusion criteria and selected studies for final analysis. Methodological quality was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. We performed a MA of binary diagnostic test accuracy within the bivariate mixed-effects logistic regression modeling framework.

RESULTS

We included five studies in our SR and MA. These studies included a total of 556 trauma patients. The MA found that, compared with PW, the US was 79% sensitive and 92% specific for detecting occult penetrating cardiac injuries in hemodynamically stable patients. The presence of a concomitant left hemothorax was frequent in patients with false-negative results.

CONCLUSION

This SR and MA found that, compared with PW, US was 79% sensitive and 92% specific for detecting occult penetrating cardiac injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma. Caution interpretation of pericardial US results is suggested in the presence of left hemothorax. In these cases, a second diagnostic test should be performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, level II.

The Role of Ultrasound for Detecting Occult Penetrating Cardiac Wounds in Hemodynamically Stable Patients

BACKGROUND

There is evidence in favor of using the ultrasound as the primary screening tool in looking for an occult cardiac injury. We report on a prospective single-center study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for the diagnosis of occult penetrating cardiac wounds in a low-resource hospital from a middle-income country.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively. We included all consecutive patients 14 years and older who presented to the Emergency Trauma Unit with (1) penetrating injuries to the precordial area and (2) a systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg (hemodynamically stable). The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound compared with those of the pericardial window, which was the standard test.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients met the inclusion criteria. Our results showed that for diagnosing an occult cardiac injury, the sensitivity of the chest ultrasonography was 79.31%, and the specificity was 92.86%. Of the 110 patients with a normal or negative ultrasound, six had a positive pericardial window. All of these patients had left hemothoraces. None of them required further cardiac surgical interventions.

CONCLUSION

We found that ultrasound was 79% sensitive and 92% specific for the diagnosis of occult penetrating cardiac wounds. However, it should be used with caution in patients with injuries to the cardiac zone and simultaneous left hemothorax.

Hemopericardio por disparo sin lesión cardíaca, descripción de un mecanismo de trauma

Introducción. Durante muchos siglos, las heridas del corazón se consideraron fatales. Actualmente, el trauma cardíaco sigue siendo una de las lesiones más letales. Los resultados de pacientes con lesión cardíaca penetrante pueden variar de lesiones letales a arritmias que se resuelven espontáneamente. El hemopericardio en el trauma generalmente es debido a la lesión cardíaca penetrante, pero el saco pericárdico puede llenarse de sangre de grandes vasos y de la ruptura de la arteria pericardiofrénica asociada a laceración pericárdica contusa. Métodos. Para la organización de este estudio, se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en la literatura científica. Dos casos fueron observados por el equipo de Cirugía General al describir este raro mecanismo de trauma. Resultados. Descripción de una causa diferente de hemopericardio, ocasionada por la sangre de la cavidad peritoneal. Discusión. En los casos presentados, la lesión por arma de fuego rompió la barrera entre las cavidades pericárdica y peritoneal (diafragma), colocando cavidades con diferentes niveles de presión, favoreciendo la entrada de sangre de la cavidad peritoneal al saco pericárdico. Conclusión. En los casos observados el proyectil pasó muy cerca del corazón, pero sin lesionarlo. La ruptura de la superficie diafragmática del pericardio permitió que la presión de la cavidad peritoneal se igualara con la presión del pericardio.

Diagnostic accuracy of eFAST in the trauma patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Performing an extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) exam is common practice in the initial assessment of trauma patients. The objective of this study was to systematically review the published literature on diagnostic accuracy of all components of the eFAST exam.

Methods

We searched Medline and Embase from inception through October 2018, for diagnostic studies examining the sensitivity and specificity of the eFAST exam. After removal of duplicates, 767 records remained for screening, of which 119 underwent full text review. Meta-DiSc™ software was used to create pooled sensitivities and specificities for included studies. Study quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.

Results

Seventy-five studies representing 24,350 patients satisfied our selection criteria. Studies were published between 1989 and 2017. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated for the detection of pneumothorax (69% and 99% respectively), pericardial effusion (91% and 94% respectively), and intra-abdominal free fluid (74% and 98% respectively). Sub-group analysis was completed for detection of intra-abdominal free fluid in hypotensive (sensitivity 74% and specificity 95%), adult normotensive (sensitivity 76% and specificity 98%) and pediatric patients (sensitivity 71% and specificity 95%).

Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that e-FAST is a useful bedside tool for ruling in pneumothorax, pericardial effusion, and intra-abdominal free fluid in the trauma setting. Its usefulness as a rule-out tool is not supported by these results.

Selective nonoperative management of penetrating thoracic injury

BACKGROUND

Thoracic penetrating injury is a cause for up to one-fifth of all non-natural deaths. The aim of this study was to determine the success of selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of patients presenting with a penetrating thoracic injury (PTI).

METHODS

This was a prospective study of patients with PTI who presented to a level 1 Trauma Center between April 2012 and August 2012.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients were included in the study, with 5.7% (n=14) requiring immediate emergency surgery. Overall, five of these 248 patients died, resulting in a mortality rate of 2.0%. Primarily 221 patients (89.1%) were managed with SNOM, of whom 15 (6.8%) failed conservative management. Failure of SNOM was primarily caused by complications of chest tube drainage (n=12) (e.g. retained clot, empyema) and delayed development of cardiac tamponade (n=3). The survival rate in the SNOM group was 100%.

CONCLUSION

PTI has a low in-hospital mortality rate. Only 16.5% (41/248) of the patients presenting with PTI will need surgical treatment. The other patients are safe to be treated conservatively according to a protocolized SNOM approach for PTI without any additional mortality. Conservative treatment of patients who were selected for this nonoperative treatment strategy with repeated clinical reassessment was successful in 93.2%.

Cardiac Injuries at Estonian Major Trauma Facilities: A 23-year Perspective

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cardiac injuries are highly lethal lesions following trauma and most of the patients decease in pre-hospital settings. However, studies on cardiac trauma in Estonia are scarce. Thus, we set out to study cardiac injuries admitted to Estonian major trauma facilities during 23 years of Estonian independence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After the ethics review board approval, all consecutive patients with cardiac injuries per ICD-9 (861.0 and 861.1) and ICD-10 codes (S.26) admitted to the major trauma facilities between 1 January 1993 and 31 July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Cardiac contusions were excluded. Data collected included demographics, injury profile, and in-hospital outcomes. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiac injury profile and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

During the study period, 37 patients were included. Mean age was 33.1 ± 12.0 years and 92% were male. Penetrating and blunt trauma accounted for 89% and 11% of the cases, respectively. Thoracotomy and sternotomy rates for cardiac repair were 80% and 20%, respectively. Most frequently injured cardiac chamber was left ventricle at 49% followed by right ventricle, right atrium, and left atrium at 34%, 17%, and 3% of the patients, respectively. Multi-chamber injury was observed at 5% of the cases. Overall hospital length of stay was 13.5 ± 16.7 days. Overall mortality was 22% (n = 8) with uniformly fatal outcomes following left atrial and multi-chamber injuries.

CONCLUSION

Overall, 37 patients with cardiac injuries were hospitalized to national major trauma facilities during the 23-year study period. The overall in-hospital mortality was 22% comparing favorably with previous reports. Risk factors for mortality were initial Glasgow Coma Scale < 9, pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and alcohol intoxication.

The Dangers of Equivocal FAST in Trauma Resuscitation

Equivocal focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations confound decision-making for trauma surgeons. We sought to determine whether the equivocal FAST (defined as any nonconcordant result) has a deleterious effect on trauma outcomes. A 2-year review (2014–2015) of all trauma activations at our Level I trauma center was performed. Patients were matched at baseline and FAST results were compared. Outcomes included resuscitation time (h), ventilation days (d), hospital length of stay (HLOS-d), ICU length-of-stay, and survival (%). In addition, skill level of the sonographer was stratified by novice (postgraduate year (PGY) years 1–3) or expert skill levels (PGY-4/fellow or attending). A total of 1,027 patients were included. Compared with concordant FAST examinations, equivocal FASTs were associated with increased HLOS (14.1 vs 10.6, P = 0.05), higher mortality (9.8 vs 3.7%, P = 0.02), decreased positive predictive value in the right upper quadrant (RUQ) (55 vs 79%, P = 0.02) and left upper quadrant (LUQ) (50 vs 83%, P < 0.01) and significantly decreased specificity in the thoracic (83 vs 98%), RUQ (80 vs 98%), LUQ (86 vs 99%), and pelvic (88 vs 98%) windows (P < 0.01 for all). A trend of greater positive predictive value in the thoracic window (100 vs 81%, P = 0.09) among PGY-4/fellow and attending providers compared with PGY levels 1–3 was observed. Equivocal FASTs portend worse outcomes than concordant FASTs because of high false-negative rates, specifically in the thoracic region and the upper quadrants. Lower thresholds for intervention are recommended.

Getting a better look: Outcomes of laparoscopic versus transdiaphragmatic pericardial window for penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma at a Level I trauma center

BACKGROUND

In penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma, it is necessary to evaluate both the pericardial fluid and the diaphragm directly. Transdiaphragmatic pericardial windows (TDWs) provide direct access to the pericardium and diaphragm but expose the patient to the risks of laparotomy. We hypothesize that transabdominal laparoscopic pericardial windows (LPWs) are a safe and effective alternative to TDWs in stable patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of stable patients with thoracoabdominal penetrating trauma at a level I trauma center between January 2007 and June 2015, comparing outcomes after TDW versus LPW.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients with penetrating trauma had a diagnostic pericardial window, 33 of which were laparoscopic. Stab wounds were most common (80, 80.8%) compared with gunshot wounds (19, 19.2%). Of 11 patients who had a positive pericardial window, 10 (90.9%) were associated with a cardiac injury. There was no difference in the ratio of positive pericardial windows for patients who had TDW versus LPW (8/66, 12.1% vs. 3/33, 9.1%; p = 0.651). One patient had a complication related to a negative pericardial window in the laparoscopic group. There was no difference in complication rates between TDW and LPW (p = 0.155). Mean length of stay was longer in TDW compared with LPW (12 vs. 5 days, p = 0.046). One patient died during index admission in the TDW group, but there was no difference in mortality rates between TDW and LPW during the index admission (p = 0.477). Median length of follow-up was 29 days (range, 0-2,709). On long-term follow-up, there was also no difference in mortality rates between TDW and LPW (2/66, 3.0% vs. 2/33, 6.1%; p = 0.470).

CONCLUSION

In hemodynamically stable patients with thoracoabdominal injuries, LPW is a safe and effective technique in evaluating both pericardial fluid and the diaphragm. LPW is a viable alternative to exploratory laparotomy and TDWs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Positive video-assisted thoracoscopic pericardial window management of a right ventricle stab wound with minimally invasive technique

This is a case report of a successful right ventricle stab wound suture through a video-assisted pericardial thoracoscopic window, avoiding the need of a thoracotomy diminishing its associated risks, morbidity and costs. A 22-year-old patient was admitted to the emergency room with a stab wound on the left side of his chest, the patient showed symptoms of dyspnea and signs of pulmonary hypoventilation on his left lung, a chest tube were placed on the affected side with an improvement on his symptoms. A video-assisted thoracoscopic pericardial window (VATPW) was performed within the next 24 hours to rule out underlying heart wound. A VATPW shows a 1 cm right ventricle wound which was treated through the same portals avoiding a thoracotomy. The left chest tube was removed 48 hours after de procedure and the patient underwent a control echocardiogram, with no abnormalities reported and no symptoms of dyspnea, respiratory distress or palpitation the patient was subsequently discharged. The VATPW is a feasible and safe procedure to rule out underlying heart injury in individualized cases and it provides a minimally invasive treatment option in selected patients avoiding major surgery like thoracotomy or sternotomy and the added morbidity that carry with them.

Thinking outside the box: re-evaluating the approach to penetrating cardiac injuries

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating cardiac injuries are infrequent but highly lethal. To address these injuries, cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiothoracic surgery availability are required for Level I trauma center verification. However, acute care surgeons are more readily available for this time-sensitive injury. The purpose of this study was to review an acute care surgery-based experience with penetrating cardiac trauma at an urban Level 1 trauma center. Our hypothesis was that care provided solely by acute care surgeons was both safe and effective for this patient population.

METHODS

All patients with injuries to the 'cardiac box' following penetrating thoracic trauma were identified from 2005-2010. Demographic and injury related data were obtained. The types and location of cardiac injury, as well as patient outcomes, were determined from operative reports.

RESULTS

1701 patients with penetrating chest trauma were admitted during the study period. 260 patients were identified as having high-risk injuries and were included in the review. 37 patients underwent resuscitative thoracotomy, with a survival rate of 8 %. 76 patients (29 %) suffered a cardiac injury. 72 % of these patients had a preoperative FAST exam, which had a sensitivity and specificity of 56.5 and 82.5 % respectively. 82 % underwent a pericardial window, which had a positive predictive value of 81.4 %. 61 % (n = 46) of the patients with a cardiac injury survived, while the overall death rate in this cohort was 21 %. No patients in the cohort required cardiopulmonary bypass for emergent repair of cardiac injury and acute care surgeons performed all cases.

CONCLUSION

Penetrating injury to the heart is highly lethal and time-sensitive. Increasingly, FAST and subxyphoid pericardial window are relied upon to make the diagnosis in patients arriving in varying stages of shock to the resuscitation room. Acute care surgeons are the most appropriate surgeons to care for these injuries and provide safe and effective care.

Utility of Chest Computed Tomography after a “Normal” Chest Radiograph in Patients with Thoracic Stab Wounds

Chest computed tomography (CCT) is used to screen for injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating injury. We aim to determine the incidence of missed injuries detected on CCT after a negative chest radiograph (CXR) in patients with thoracic stab wounds. A 10-year retrospective review of a Level I trauma center registry was performed on patients with thoracic stab wounds. Patients who were hemodynamically unstable or did not undergo both CXR and CCT were excluded. Patients with a negative CXR were evaluated to determine if additional findings were diagnosed on CCT. Of 386 patients with stab wounds to the chest, 154 (40%) underwent both CXR and CCT. One hundred and fifteen (75%) had a negative screening CXR. CCT identified injuries in 42 patients (37%) that were not seen on CXR. Pneumothorax and/or hemothorax occurred in 40 patients (35%), of which 14 patients underwent tube thoracostomy. Two patients had hemopericardium on CCT and both required operative intervention. Greater than one-third of patients with a normal screening CXR were found to have abnormalities on CCT. Future studies comparing repeat CXR to CCT are required to further define the optimal diagnostic strategy in patients with stab wounds to chest after normal screening CXR.

Survival predictor for penetrating cardiac injury; a 10-year consecutive cohort from a scandinavian trauma center

BACKGROUND

Penetrating cardiac injuries in Europe have been poorly studied. We present a 10-year outcome for patients with penetrating heart injuries at Oslo University Hospital.

METHODS

Data from 01.01.2001 until 31.12.2010 was collected from the Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry and from the patients' records.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were admitted with a penetrating cardiac injury. Fourteen patients survived (45%). Four out of 8 patients (50%) with gunshot wounds survived compared to 10 out of 23 (44%) with stab wounds. Median (quartiles) for the following values were: Injury Severity Score 25 (21-35), Revised Trauma Score 0 (0-6,9), Probability of Survival 0,015 (0,004-0,956), Glasgow Coma Scale 3 (3-13). Thirteen patients had signs of life on admission and survived. Eighteen patients were admitted without signs of life and received emergency department thoracotomy. Eight of these had no signs of life at the scene of injury and did not survive. Out of the remaining 10 patients, one survived.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of patients with penetrating cardiac injury reaching the emergency department with signs of life was excellent. Hemodynamic instability indicates immediate surgery. Stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma and possible cardiac injury detected by imaging should be considered for conservative treatment.