1
|
Zaborowski AM, Roe S, Rothwell J, Evoy D, Geraghty J, McCartan D, Prichard RS. A systematic review of oncological outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:361-368. [PMID: 36208279 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Nipple-sparing mastectomy is an alternative to skin-sparing mastectomy in select patients. Increasing evidence supports its use in the setting of breast cancer, however concerns still exist regarding oncological safety. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate long-term oncological outcomes of patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate oncological outcomes in patients with breast cancer who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy. Five major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane) were searched. The review included all original articles published in English reporting long-term oncological outcomes. 2334 studies were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 17 retrospective studies involving 7107 patients were included. The indication for nipple-sparing mastectomy was invasive carcinoma in 6069 patients (85.4%) and in situ disease in 1038 (14.6%). Median follow up was 48 months (range 25-94). The weighted mean rates of local recurrence and recurrence involving the nipple-areola complex were 5.4% (0.9-11.9) and 1.3% (0-4.9), respectively. The weighted mean distant failure rate was 4.8% (1.5-23.0). Therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy is oncologically safe in select patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra M Zaborowski
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Simon Roe
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jane Rothwell
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Evoy
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - James Geraghty
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Damian McCartan
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ruth S Prichard
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee AY. Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in the Era of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: The Accuracy of Preoperative MRI. Radiology 2023; 307:e223297. [PMID: 36749217 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.223297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amie Y Lee
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 1825 4th St, Room L3185, San Francisco, CA 94107
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matsuyama Y, Nakamura T, Yoshida K, Hagi T, Iino T, Asanuma K, Sudo A. Radiodynamic therapy with acridine orange local administration as a new treatment option for primary and secondary bone tumours. Bone Joint Res 2022; 11:715-722. [PMID: 36214462 PMCID: PMC9582865 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.1110.bjr-2022-0105.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Acridine orange (AO) demonstrates several biological activities. When exposed to low doses of X-ray radiation, AO increases the production of reactive radicals (radiodynamic therapy (AO-RDT)). We elucidated the efficacy of AO-RDT in breast and prostate cancer cell lines, which are likely to develop bone metastases. METHODS We used the mouse osteosarcoma cell line LM8, the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, and the human prostate cancer cell line PC-3. Cultured cells were exposed to AO and radiation at various concentrations followed by various doses of irradiation. The cell viability was then measured. In vivo, each cell was inoculated subcutaneously into the backs of mice. In the AO-RDT group, AO (1.0 μg) was locally administered subcutaneously around the tumour followed by 5 Gy of irradiation. In the radiation group, 5 Gy of irradiation alone was administered after macroscopic tumour formation. The mice were killed on the 14th day after treatment. The change in tumour volume by AO-RDT was primarily evaluated. RESULTS The viability of LM8, MDA-MB-231, and PC-3 cells strongly decreased at AO concentration of 1.0 μg/ml and a radiation dose of 5 Gy. In xenograft mouse model, the AO-RDT also showed a strong cytocidal effect on tumour at the backside in osteosarcoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. AO-RDT treatment was more effective for tumour control than radiotherapy in breast cancer. CONCLUSION AO-RDT was effective in preventing the proliferation of osteosarcoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer cell lines in vitro. The reduction in tumour volume by AO-RDT was also confirmed in vivo.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(10):685-692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumi Matsuyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Tomoki Nakamura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan, Tomoki Nakamura. E-mail:
| | - Keisuke Yoshida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Tomohito Hagi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Takahiro Iino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Asanuma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Akihiro Sudo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bargon CA, Young-Afat DA, Ikinci M, Braakenburg A, Rakhorst HA, Mureau MAM, Verkooijen HM, Doeksen A. Breast cancer recurrence after immediate and delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer 2022; 128:3449-3469. [PMID: 35894936 PMCID: PMC9546326 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Oncological safety of different types and timings of PMBR after breast cancer remains controversial. Lack of stratified risk assessment in literature makes current clinical and shared decision‐making complex. This is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate differences in oncological outcomes after immediate versus delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) for autologous and implant‐based PMBR separately. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and Meta‐analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist were followed for data abstraction. Variability in point estimates attributable to heterogeneity was assessed using I2‐statistic. (Loco)regional breast cancer recurrence rates, distant metastasis rates, and overall breast cancer recurrence rates were pooled in generalized linear mixed models using random effects. Results Fifty‐five studies, evaluating 14,217 patients, were included. When comparing immediate versus delayed autologous PMBR, weighted average proportions were: 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.03) versus 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.04), respectively, for local recurrences, 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.03) versus 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.03) for regional recurrences, and 0.04 (95% CI, 0.03–0.06) versus 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00–0.03) for locoregional recurrences. No statistically significant differences in weighted average proportions for local, regional and locoregional recurrence rates were observed between immediate and delayed autologous PMBR. Data did not allow comparing weighted average proportions of distant metastases and total breast cancer recurrences after autologous PMBR, and of all outcome measures after implant‐based PMBR. Conclusions Delayed autologous PMBR leads to similar (loco)regional breast cancer recurrence rates compared to immediate autologous PMBR. This study highlights the paucity of strong evidence on breast cancer recurrence after specific types and timings of PMBR. Lay summery Oncologic safety of different types and timings of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) remains controversial. Lack of stratified risk assessment in literature makes clinical and shared decision‐making complex. This meta‐analysis showed that delayed autologous PMBR leads to similar (loco)regional recurrence rates as immediate autologous PMBR. Data did not allow comparing weighted average proportions of distant metastases and total breast cancer recurrence after autologous PMBR, and of all outcome measures after implant‐based PMBR. Based on current evidence, oncological concerns do not seem a valid reason to withhold patients from certain reconstructive timings or techniques, and patients should equally be offered all reconstructive options they technically qualify for.
Oncologic safety of different types and timings of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) remains controversial. This meta‐analysis showed that delayed autologous PMBR leads to similar (loco)regional breast cancer recurrence rates compared to immediate autologous PMBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia A Bargon
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Danny A Young-Afat
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mehmet Ikinci
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Assa Braakenburg
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hinne A Rakhorst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek Doeksen
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Esgueva AJ, Noordhoek I, Kranenbarg EMK, Espinosa-Bravo M, Mátrai Z, Zhygulin A, Irmejs A, Mavioso C, Meani F, González E, Özdemir M, Allweis T, Rogowski K, Dos Santos CR, Mora H, Ponzone R, Samorani D, van de Velde C, Audisio RA, Rubio IT. Health-Related Quality of Life After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results From the INSPIRE Registry. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1722-1734. [PMID: 34748122 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10930-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is increasingly used for both breast cancer (TNSM) and risk reduction (RRNSM). The aim of the study is to report the results of the INSPIRE registry assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparing baseline and 1-year follow-up, regarding surgical indications and chemotherapy (CT) received. METHODS INSPIRE is a prospective database including women undergoing NSM and IBR from 18 countries. HRQoL was measured using EORTC QLQC30 and QLQ-BR23 before surgery and after 1 year. RESULTS A total of 677 women were included, of whom 537 (79.3%) underwent TNSM and 140 (21.6%) RRNSM: in total, 806 NSM (556 TNSM and 250 RRNSM). Nipple involvement was present in 7.73% of TNSM and incidental carcinoma in 1.2% of the RRNSM group. Out of the overall 537 patients with systemic treatment, 177 (32.96%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and 118 (21.92%) adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). A total of 227 patients (28.16%) developed at least one complication postoperatively, 164 (29.5%) in the TNSM group and 63 (25.2%) in the RRNSM group. The TNSM group improved in global health status and emotional functioning after 1 year. No differences were found when comparing HRQoL at 1 year between patients who received NCT and those who received adjuvant CT. The RRNSM group showed improvement in HRQoL, with better emotional functioning and fatigue after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS This registry reports HRQoL findings after NSM. The impact of CT on worse HRQoL is independent from its timing. Patients with RRNSM showed an improved HRQoL at 1-year follow-up. Discussion of HRQoL outcomes with patients will facilitate the informed decision-making when considering NSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio J Esgueva
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iris Noordhoek
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Zoltán Mátrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrii Zhygulin
- Breast Unit, LISOD, Hospital of Israeli Oncology, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Arvids Irmejs
- Breast Unit, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Carlos Mavioso
- Breast Unit Centro Clínico Champalimaud, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Francesco Meani
- Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Henrique Mora
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Cancer Center Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Magnoni F, Alessandrini S, Alberti L, Polizzi A, Rotili A, Veronesi P, Corso G. Breast Cancer Surgery: New Issues. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:4053-4066. [PMID: 34677262 PMCID: PMC8534635 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Since ancient times, breast cancer treatment has crucially relied on surgeons and clinicians making great efforts to find increasingly conservative approaches to cure the tumor. In the Halstedian era (mid-late 19th century), the predominant practice consisted of the radical and disfiguring removal of the breast, much to the detriment of women's psycho-physical well-being. Thanks to enlightened scientists such as Professor Umberto Veronesi, breast cancer surgery has since impressively progressed and adopted a much more conservative approach. Over the last three decades, a better understanding of tumor biology and of its significant biomarkers has made the assessment of genetic and molecular profiles increasingly important. At the same time, neo-adjuvant treatments have been introduced, and great improvements in genetics, imaging technologies and in both oncological and reconstructive surgical techniques have been made. The future of breast cancer management must now rest on an ever more precise and targeted type of surgery that, through an increasingly multidisciplinary and personalized approach, can ensure oncological radicality while offering the best possible quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.A.); (L.A.); (A.P.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sofia Alessandrini
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.A.); (L.A.); (A.P.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Luca Alberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.A.); (L.A.); (A.P.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Andrea Polizzi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.A.); (L.A.); (A.P.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Anna Rotili
- Division of Breast Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.A.); (L.A.); (A.P.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Corso
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.A.); (L.A.); (A.P.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu ZY, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Chung IY, Kim J, Lee SB, Son BH, Eom JS, Jeong JH, Gong G, Kim HH, Ahn SH, Ko B. Factors Predicting Locoregional Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Nipple-Sparing/Skin-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Front Oncol 2021; 11:675955. [PMID: 34277421 PMCID: PMC8281333 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few data are available on the risk factors of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in breast cancer. Herein, we evaluated the factors predicting LRR in a large series of patients who underwent either nipple- (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with IBR after NACT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 609 breast cancer patients who underwent NACT and NSM/SSM with IBR between February 2010 and June 2017. Factors associated with an increased risk of LRR were analyzed by univariate (chi-square or Fisher's exact test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazard regression model) analyses. Results During a median follow-up of 63 months, LRR as the first event occurred in 73 patients, and the 5-year cumulative LRR rate was 10.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed post-NACT Ki67 ≥ 10% [hazard ratio (HR), 2.208; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.295-3.765; P = 0.004], high tumor grade (HR, 1.738; 95% CI, 1.038-2.908; P = 0.035), and presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR, 1.725; 95% CI, 1.039-2.864; P = 0.035) as independently associated with increased LRR risk. The 10-year LRR rate was 8.5% for patients with none of the three associated risk factors, 11.6% with one factor, 25.1% with two factors, and 33.7% with all three factors (P < 0.001). Conclusions Post-NACT Ki67 ≥ 10%, high tumor grade, and presence of LVI are independently associated with an increased risk of developing LRR after NACT and NSM/SSM with IBR. Future prospective trials are warranted to decrease the risk of LRR in patients with associated risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Yu Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Won Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Il Yong Chung
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jisun Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sae Byul Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung-Ho Son
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Sup Eom
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Ho Jeong
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gyungyub Gong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hak Hee Kim
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sei-Hyun Ahn
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - BeomSeok Ko
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Patients with Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-020-00399-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|