1
|
Hobeika C, Sauvanet A. ASO Author Reflections: Rethinking Spleen Preservation in Patients with Body Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4691-4692. [PMID: 38649552 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15273-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hobeika
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
- UMR Inserm 1275 CAP Paris-Tech, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guidetti C, Müller PC, Magistri P, Jonas JP, Odorizzi R, Kron P, Guerrini G, Oberkofler CE, Di Sandro S, Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, Di Benedetto F. Full robotic versus open ALPPS: a bi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3448-3454. [PMID: 38698258 PMCID: PMC11133099 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10804-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primarily unresectable liver tumors, ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) may offer curative two-stage hepatectomy trough a fast and extensive hypertrophy. However, concerns have been raised about the invasiveness of the procedure. Full robotic ALPPS has the potential to reduce the postoperative morbidity trough a less invasive access. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of open and full robotic ALPPS. METHODS The bicentric study included open ALPPS cases from the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland and robotic ALPPS cases from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy from 01/2015 to 07/2022. Main outcomes were intraoperative parameters and overall complications. RESULTS Open and full robotic ALPPS were performed in 36 and 7 cases. Robotic ALPPS was associated with less blood loss after both stages (418 ± 237 ml vs. 319 ± 197 ml; P = 0.04 and 631 ± 354 ml vs. 258 ± 53 ml; P = 0.01) as well as a higher rate of interstage discharge (86% vs. 37%; P = 0.02). OT was longer with robotic ALPPS after both stages (371 ± 70 min vs. 449 ± 81 min; P = 0.01 and 282 ± 87 min vs. 373 ± 90 min; P = 0.02). After ALPPS stage 2, there was no difference for overall complications (86% vs. 86%; P = 1.00) and major complications (43% vs. 39%; P = 0.86). The total length of hospital stay was similar (23 ± 17 days vs. 26 ± 13; P = 0.56). CONCLUSION Robotic ALPPS was safely implemented and showed potential for improved perioperative outcomes compared to open ALPPS in an experienced robotic center. The robotic approach might bring the perioperative risk profile of ALPPS closer to interventional techniques of portal vein embolization/liver venous deprivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Philip C Müller
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Jan Philipp Jonas
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Philipp Kron
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gianpiero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Vivévis - Clinic Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maurer E, Bartsch DK. Surgical aspects related to hereditary pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer 2024:10.1007/s10689-024-00384-1. [PMID: 38662263 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00384-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
The goal of surveillance programs for individuals at risk (IAR) from familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families or families with other inherited tumor syndromes predisposing to the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), such as hereditary pancreatitis or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, is the dectection and consecutive curative resection of early PDAC or even better its high-grade precursor lesions. Although the indication for surgery is quite established, the extent of surgery is not well defined due to the lack of evidence-based data. In addition, multiple factors have to be taken into account to determine an optimal personalized surgical strategy. This holds especially true since pancreatic surgery is associated with a relatively high morbidity and might impair the quality of life significantly. In this article the surgical aspects in the setting of hereditary PDAC are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Maurer
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, 35043, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, 35043, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nickel F, Wise PA, Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, Salg GA, Steinle V, Niessen A, Mayer P, Mehrabi A, Loos M, Müller-Stich BP, Kulu Y, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Ann Surg 2024; 279:665-670. [PMID: 37389886 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of the current study was to investigate the perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in a high-volume center. BACKGROUND Despite RPDs prospective advantages over OPD, current evidence comparing the 2 has been limited and has prompted further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare both approaches while including the learning curve phase for RPD. METHODS A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis of a prospective database of RPD with OPD (2017-2022) at a high-volume center was performed. The main outcomes were overall- and pancreas-specific complications. RESULTS Of 375 patients who underwent PD (OPD n=276; RPD n=99), 180 were included in propensity score-matched analysis (90 per group). RPD was associated with less blood loss [500 (300-800) vs 750 (400-1000) mL; P =0.006] and more patients without a complication (50% vs 19%; P <0.001). Operative time was longer [453 (408-529) vs 306 (247-362) min; P <0.001]; in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma, fewer lymph nodes were harvested [24 (18-27) vs 33 (27-39); P <0.001] with RPD versus OPD. There were no significant differences for major complications (38% vs 47%; P =0.291), reoperation rate (14% vs 10%; P =0.495), postoperative pancreatic fistula (21% vs 23%; P =0.858), and patients with the textbook outcome (62% vs 55%; P =0.452). CONCLUSIONS Including the learning phase, RPD can be safely implemented in high-volume settings and shows potential for improved perioperative outcomes versus OPD. Pancreas-specific morbidity was unaffected by the robotic approach. Randomized trials with specifically trained pancreatic surgeons and expanded indications for the robotic approach are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp A Wise
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, University Hospital and St. Clare Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, University Hospital and St. Clare Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Amila Cizmic
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriel A Salg
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Verena Steinle
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Niessen
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Mayer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, University Hospital and St. Clare Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yakup Kulu
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jiang Q, Lu C, Zhou Y, Zhu Q, Ren Y, Mou Y, Jin W. Comparison of manual sutures and laparoscopic stapler for pancreatic stump closure techniques in robotic distal pancreatectomy: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1230-1238. [PMID: 38091107 PMCID: PMC10881752 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10601-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) are prevalent and major postoperative complications of distal pancreatectomy (DP). There are numerous ways to manage the pancreatic stump. However, no single approach has been shown to be consistently superior. Moreover, the potential role of robotic systems in reducing POPFs has received little attention. METHODS The clinical data of 119 patients who had consecutively received robotic distal pancreatectomy between January 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the method of handling the pancreatic stump. The attributes of the patients and the variables during the perioperative period were compared. RESULTS The analysis included 72 manual sutures and 47 stapler procedures. The manual suture group had a shorter operative time (removing installation time) than the stapler group (125.25 ± 63.04 min vs 153.30 ± 62.03 min, p = 0.019). Additionally, the manual suture group had lower estimated blood loss (50 mL vs 100 mL, p = 0.009) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. There were no significant differences in the incidence of clinically relevant POPFs between the two groups (18.1% vs 23.4%, P > 0.05). No perioperative death occurred in either group. CONCLUSION The manual suturing technique was shown to have an incidence of POPFs similar to the stapler technique in robotic distal pancreatectomy and to be safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qitao Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
- Department of Surgery, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, 233030, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yucheng Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Qicong Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yufeng Ren
- Department of Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yiping Mou
- Department of Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| | - Weiwei Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Borys M, Wysocki M, Gałązka K, Stanek M, Budzyński A. Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas - technical considerations with analysis of surgical outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:74. [PMID: 38400929 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03265-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to establish whether laparoscopic RAMPS (L-RAMPS) is a safe procedure with better oncological outcomes compared to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) with splenectomy among patients with distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS This is a retrospective study performed on consecutive patients who underwent L-RAMPS and LDP with splenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable PDAC of the body and tail. In this paper, we presented our technique of laparoscopic RAMPS and analyzed intraoperative and perioperative complications, oncological efficacy, and long-term survival. RESULTS The study included 12 patients in the L-RAMPS group and 13 patients in the LDP with splenectomy. L-RAMPS was associated with significantly higher rates of R0 resection (91.7% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.027). There were no differences between the L-RAMPS and LDP with splenectomy groups in intraoperative blood loss (400 mL vs 400 mL, p = 0.783) and median operative time (250 min vs 220 min, p = 0.785). No differences were found in terms of perioperative complications, including the incidence of pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic RAMPS is a feasible and safe procedure. It provides higher radicality as compared with LDP with splenectomy, without increasing the risk of complications. Further studies are necessary to evaluate long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Borys
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Osiedle Zlotej Jesieni 1, 31-826, Cracow, Poland
| | - Michał Wysocki
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Osiedle Zlotej Jesieni 1, 31-826, Cracow, Poland.
| | - Krystyna Gałązka
- Department of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Maciej Stanek
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Osiedle Zlotej Jesieni 1, 31-826, Cracow, Poland
| | - Andrzej Budzyński
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Osiedle Zlotej Jesieni 1, 31-826, Cracow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hays SB, Corvino G, Lorié BD, McMichael WV, Mehdi SA, Rieser C, Rojas AE, Hogg ME. Prince and princesses: The current status of robotic surgery in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:164-182. [PMID: 38031870 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgery has experienced a dramatic increase in utilization across general surgery over the last two decades, including in surgical oncology. Although urologists and gynecologists were the first to show that this technology could be utilized in cancer surgery, the robot is now a powerful tool in the treatment of gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreatico-biliary, colorectal, endocrine, and soft tissue malignancies. While long-term outcomes are still pending, short-term outcomes have showed promise for this technologic advancement of cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Hays
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Gaetano Corvino
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin D Lorié
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - William V McMichael
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Syed A Mehdi
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Caroline Rieser
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Aram E Rojas
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu Q, Dai M, Guo J, Wu H, Wang W, Chen G, Hu Y, Han X, Xu Q, Zhang X, Yang S, Zhang Y, Kleeff J, Liao Q, Wu W, Liang Z, Zhang T, Zhao Y. Long-term Survival, Quality of Life, and Molecular Features of the Patients With Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Retrospective Study of 454 Cases. Ann Surg 2023; 278:1009-1017. [PMID: 37036095 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present comprehensive information on the clinicopathological, molecular, survival characteristics, and quality of life (QOL) after surgery for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas in a large cohort after long-term follow-up. BACKGROUND SPN is a rare tumor with an uncertain malignant potential, and solid information on long-term prognosis and QOL remains limited. METHODS All hospitalized patients with SPNs who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2021 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were retrieved. A cross-sectional telephone questionnaire was administered to inquire about the QOL. Molecular analyses were performed using whole-exome sequencing. RESULTS Exactly 454 patients with SPN were enrolled, of whom 18.5% were males and 81.5% were females. The mean patient age was 31 ± 12 years. In total, 61.3% of the patients had no symptoms. The size of the tumors was 5.38 ± 3.70 cm; 83.4% were solid cystic tumors, and 40.1% had calcifications. The proportions of local resection, distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pylorus preservation were 29.7%, 28.9% or 22.9%, and 11% or 6.8%, respectively. Over the years, there has been a significant shift from open to minimally invasive surgery. Among all surgical procedures, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) had the highest incidence of grade 2 to 4 complications (up to 32.3%), compared with 6.7% in distal pancreatectomy ( P < 0.001). Regarding histopathology, tissue invasion, perineural invasion, cancerous microvascular emboli, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were present in 16.5%, 2.2%, 0.7%, 2.0%, and 3.1% of patients, respectively. Sixty patients were lost to follow-up. Sixteen of the 390 patients who underwent resection (4.1%) experienced local recurrence or distant metastasis after surgery. In total, 361 patients responded to the telephone survey. Nearly 80% of patients claimed their QOL was not significantly affected after surgery; however, the remaining 20% complained of lower QOL during 3 to 6 years of follow-up after surgery. No clinicopathological factor could reliably predict clinical recurrence or metastasis after resection. A total of 28 driver genes were detected with mutations in at least 2 tumor samples and the top 3 frequently mutated genes were CTNNB1 , ATRNL1 , and MUC16 . CONCLUSIONS This study presented the largest cohort of patients with SPN after surgery from a single center and reported the QOL of these patients. SPN is associated with extremely favorable long-term survival, even in patients with metastasis, and most patients have a good QOL after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaofei Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Menghua Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Junchao Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Huanwen Wu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Weibin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Ge Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Ya Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Xianlin Han
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Sen Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Yalu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Jorg Kleeff
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Quan Liao
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Wenming Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyong Liang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Taiping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Yupei Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Research in Pancreatic Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sousa Da Silva RX, Breuer E, Shankar S, Kawakatsu S, Hołówko W, Santos Coelho J, Jeddou H, Sugiura T, Ghallab M, Da Silva D, Watanabe G, Botea F, Sakai N, Addeo P, Tzedakis S, Bartsch F, Balcer K, Lim C, Werey F, Lopez-Lopez V, Peralta Montero L, Sanchez Claria R, Leiting J, Vachharajani N, Hopping E, Torres OJM, Hirano S, Andel D, Hagendoorn J, Psica A, Ravaioli M, Ahn KS, Reese T, Montes LA, Gunasekaran G, Alcázar C, Lim JH, Haroon M, Lu Q, Castaldi A, Orimo T, Moeckli B, Abadía T, Ruffolo L, Dib Hasan J, Ratti F, Kauffmann EF, de Wilde RF, Polak WG, Boggi U, Aldrighetti L, McCormack L, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Serrablo A, Toso C, Taketomi A, Gugenheim J, Dong J, Hanif F, Park JS, Ramia JM, Schwartz M, Ramisch D, De Oliveira ML, Oldhafer KJ, Kang KJ, Cescon M, Lodge P, Rinkes IHMB, Noji T, Thomson JE, Goh SK, Chapman WC, Cleary SP, Pekolj J, Regimbeau JM, Scatton O, Truant S, Lang H, Fuks D, Bachellier P, Ohtsuka M, Popescu I, Hasegawa K, Lesurtel M, Adam R, Cherqui D, Uesaka K, Boudjema K, Pinto-Marques H, Grąt M, Petrowsky H, Ebata T, Prachalias A, Robles-Campos R, Clavien PA. Novel Benchmark Values for Open Major Anatomic Liver Resection in Non-cirrhotic Patients: A Multicentric Study of 44 International Expert Centers. Ann Surg 2023; 278:748-755. [PMID: 37465950 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities. BACKGROUND Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures. METHODS A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient. RESULTS Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months. CONCLUSION These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard X Sousa Da Silva
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Breuer
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sadhana Shankar
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Shoji Kawakatsu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Wacław Hołówko
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - João Santos Coelho
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Centre, Curry Cabral Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Heithem Jeddou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Mohammed Ghallab
- Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Doris Da Silva
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Genki Watanabe
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Florin Botea
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nozomu Sakai
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Fabian Bartsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kaja Balcer
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille, France
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Fabien Werey
- Department of Oncology and Digestive Surgery, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Victor Lopez-Lopez
- Clinic and University Virgen de la Arrixaca Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain
| | - Luciana Peralta Montero
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, General Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, General Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Neeta Vachharajani
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Organ Transplant, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Eve Hopping
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide & Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Orlando J M Torres
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Presidente Dutra Hospital, São Luiz, Brazil
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Daan Andel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alicja Psica
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Hepato-biliary surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Keun Soon Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Tim Reese
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Leonardo A Montes
- General Surgery Department Liver, Pancreas and Intestinal Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ganesh Gunasekaran
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Service, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Cándido Alcázar
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Transplant Unit, General Universitary Hospital Alicante and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jin Hong Lim
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Muhammad Haroon
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant, Bahria International Hospital Orchard, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Qian Lu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Antonio Castaldi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Tatsuya Orimo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Beat Moeckli
- Division of Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Teresa Abadía
- HPB Surgical Division, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Luis Ruffolo
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Josefina Dib Hasan
- Transplant Unit, Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucas McCormack
- Transplant Unit, Hospital Aleman de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Alejandro Serrablo
- HPB Surgical Division, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Christian Toso
- Division of Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Jean Gugenheim
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Faisal Hanif
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant, Bahria International Hospital Orchard, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - José M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Transplant Unit, General Universitary Hospital Alicante and Health and Biomedical Research Institute of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Service, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Diego Ramisch
- General Surgery Department Liver, Pancreas and Intestinal Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michelle L De Oliveira
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karl J Oldhafer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Koo Jeong Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepato-biliary surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Peter Lodge
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Takehiro Noji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - John-Edwin Thomson
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide & Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Su Kah Goh
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide & Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - William C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Organ Transplant, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, General Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Oncology and Digestive Surgery, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche de Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille, France
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Irinel Popescu
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - René Adam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Hugo Pinto-Marques
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Centre, Curry Cabral Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michał Grąt
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss HPB and Transplant Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McCarron FN, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. Current progress in robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at a high-volume center. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:863-870. [PMID: 37927925 PMCID: PMC10623982 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been steady growth in the adoption of robotic HPB procedures world-wide over the past 20 years, but most of this increase has occurred only recently. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of robotics has been in the United States, with very few, select centers of adoption in Italy, South Korea, and Brazil, to name a few. We began our robotic HPB program in 2008, well before almost all other centers in the world, with the most notable exception of Giullianotti and colleagues. Our program began gradually, with smaller cases carefully selected to optimize the strengths of the original robotic platform and included complex biliary and pancreatic resections. We performed the first reported series of choledochojejunostomy for benign biliary strictures and first series of completion cholecystectomies. We began performing robotic distal pancreatectomies and longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomies, reporting our early experience for each of these procedures. Over time we progressed to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies. Initially, these were performed with planned conversions until we were able to optimize efficiency. Now we have performed over 200 robotic whipples, reaching a 100% robotic completion rate by 2020. Finally, we have added robotic major hepatectomies, including resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma to our repertoire. Since the program began, we have performed over 1600 robotic HPB cases. Outcomes from our program have shown superior lymph node harvest, lower DGE rates, shorter hospitalizations, and fewer rehab admissions with similar overall complications to open and laparoscopic procedures, signifying that over time a robotic HPB program is not only feasible but advantageous as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances N. McCarron
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - John B. Martinie
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chiche L, Yang HK, Abbassi F, Robles-Campos R, Stain SC, Ko CY, Neumayer LA, Pawlik TM, Barkun JS, Clavien PA. Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 278:647-654. [PMID: 37555327 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This forum summarizes the proceedings of the joint European Surgical Association (ESA)/American Surgical Association (ASA) symposium on Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery that took place in Bordeaux, France, as part of the celebrations of the 30th anniversary of the ESA. Three presentations focused on a) the main messages from the Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference, which took place in Zurich, Switzerland, in June 2022, b) the patient perspective, and c) benchmarking were hold by ESA members and discussed by ASA members in a symposium attended by members of both associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Clifford Y Ko
- University of California at Los Angeles and the American College of Surgeons, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Leigh A Neumayer
- University of Florida, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Jeffrey S Barkun
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu X, Zhao M, Fu H, Si L, Wang Q, Mao M, Zhu Y, Guo R. The surgical treatment of female primary pelvic retroperitoneal tumours: A retrospective study of 99 patients from a single centre in China. Int J Med Robot 2023:e2591. [PMID: 37904623 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To summarise the application of minimally invasive surgery for female primary pelvic retroperitoneal tumours (PPRTs). METHODS The clinical data of PPRT in a hospital between January 2017 and August 2022 were retrospectively collected. Surgical outcomes for cystic and solid tumours and two minimally invasive techniques were compared. RESULTS 99 patients were included. Cystic tumours had fewer intraoperative injuries (4.0% vs. 28.0%, p < 0.001) than solid tumours. Robot-assisted laparoscopy (RALS) seemed to have fewer intraoperative complications (8.3% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.156) than conventional laparoscopy (CLS) in solid tumours. For cystic tumours, RALS included larger tumour sizes and longer operative times (p < 0.05), but intraoperative injury was comparable to CLS. RALS exhibited a higher cost than CLS in all tumours. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive surgery for solid PPRTs tends to be more difficult than for cystic tumours, and RALS has a slight advantage over CLS with respect to short-term PPRT outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueyan Liu
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Mengling Zhao
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hanlin Fu
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lulu Si
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Meng Mao
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ying Zhu
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruixia Guo
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davidson J, Strand M, Cullinan D, Scherer M, Zafar A, Martinie J, Vrochides D, Chapman W, Doyle M, Khan A. The importance of robotic surgery training in HPB fellowship: a survey of the 2022 AHPBA fellows. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1203-1212. [PMID: 37423851 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2022 incoming fellows' expectations for their robotics training, as well as their perceptions of the utility of the surgical robot, are not well defined. METHODS Cross-sectional survey of 24 AHPBA fellows in 2022, analyzed with descriptive statistics and Spearman's rho. RESULTS Of 33 current AHPBA fellows, 22 completed the survey (66.7%). Study participants had limited-to-moderate experience with robotics prior to fellowship (mean 2.5 ± SD 1.1; range 1-4). Most participants agreed that robotics influenced their fellowship choice (mean 4.14 ± SD 0.87; range 1-5), would make then more marketable (mean 4.77 ± SD 0.52; range 1-5) and improve job prospects (mean 4.68 ± SD 0.87; range 1-5). Of the study participants, 55% responded that robotics training is "essential" in fellowship, while 64% responded that it is "essential" for their careers. Fellows were only slightly satisfied with overall robotics training within their respective programs (mean 3.44 ± SD 1.17; range 1-5) The majority (73.7%) expect that robotics will comprise <25% of their training. Notably, the majority (75%) have no formal robotics training curriculum. DISCUSSION This survey identifies potential gaps where robotics training could be improved for future incoming AHPBA fellows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Davidson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine USA.
| | - Matthew Strand
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health USA
| | - Darren Cullinan
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine USA
| | - Meranda Scherer
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine USA
| | - Amen Zafar
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine USA
| | - John Martinie
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health USA
| | - William Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine USA
| | - Majella Doyle
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine USA
| | - Adeel Khan
- Department of Surgery, Section of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fuchs B, Schelling G, Elyes M, Studer G, Bode-Lesniewska B, Scaglioni MF, Giovanoli P, Heesen P. Unlocking the Power of Benchmarking: Real-World-Time Data Analysis for Enhanced Sarcoma Patient Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4395. [PMID: 37686671 PMCID: PMC10486409 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Benchmarking is crucial for healthcare providers to enhance quality and efficiency, notably for complex conditions like sarcomas. Multidisciplinary teams/sarcoma boards (MDT/SBs) are vital in sarcoma management, but differences in their processes can affect patient outcomes and treatment costs, despite adherence to international guidelines. To address this issue, this study aimed to compare two MDT/SBs and establish an interoperable digital platform, Sarconnector®, for real-time-world data assessment and automated analysis. The study included 983 patients, 46.0% of whom female, with a median age of 58 years, and 4.5% of patients presented with metastasis at diagnosis. Differences were observed in the number of first-time presentations, follow-up presentations, primary sarcomas, biopsies and chemotherapy indications between the two MDT/SB. The results highlight the importance of benchmarking and utilizing a harmonized data approach, such as the RWT approach provided by the Sarconnector®, to standardize and evaluate quality and cost metrics. By identifying areas of improvement and making data-driven decisions on the meta-level, healthcare providers can optimize resources and improve patient outcomes. In conclusion, benchmarking with the RWT harmonized data approach provided by the Sarconnector® can help healthcare providers improve the overall effectiveness of the healthcare system and achieve better outcomes for their patients in terms of both outcomes and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Fuchs
- Sarcoma Service, University Teaching Hospital LUKS, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland
- University Hospital USZ, University of Zurich, 8000 Zurich, Switzerland
- Sarcoma Service, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Georg Schelling
- Sarcoma Service, University Teaching Hospital LUKS, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland
- Sarcoma Service, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Maria Elyes
- Sarcoma Service, University Teaching Hospital LUKS, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Studer
- Sarcoma Service, University Teaching Hospital LUKS, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Beata Bode-Lesniewska
- Patho Enge, SSN Reference Sarcoma Pathology, University of Zurich, 8000 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mario F. Scaglioni
- Sarcoma Service, University Teaching Hospital LUKS, University of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Pietro Giovanoli
- University Hospital USZ, University of Zurich, 8000 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philip Heesen
- University Hospital USZ, University of Zurich, 8000 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hogg ME. The Surgeon, the Center, and the System-Several Styles to Stage Mastery. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:934. [PMID: 37379051 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Müller PC, Toti JMA, Guidetti C, Kuemmerli C, Bolli M, Billeter AT, Müller BP. Benchmarking outcomes for distal pancreatectomy: critical evaluation of four multicenter studies. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:253. [PMID: 37386208 PMCID: PMC10310555 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02972-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmarking is a validated tool for outcome assessment and international comparison of best achievable surgical outcomes. The methodology is increasingly applied in pancreatic surgery and the aim of the review was to critically compare available benchmark studies evaluating distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS A literature search of English articles reporting on benchmarking DP was conducted of the electronic databases MEDLINE and Web of Science (until April 2023). Studies on open (ODP), laparoscopic (LDP), and robotic DP (RDP) were included. RESULTS Four retrospective multicenter studies were included. Studies reported on outcomes of minimally invasive DP only (n = 2), ODP and LDP (n = 1), and RDP only (n = 1). Either the Achievable Benchmark of Care™ method or the 75th percentile from the median was selected to define benchmark cutoffs. Robust and reproducible benchmark values were provided by the four studies for intra- and postoperative short-term outcomes. CONCLUSION Benchmarking DP is a valuable tool for obtaining internationally accepted reference outcomes for open and minimally invasive DP approaches with only minor variances in four international cohorts. Benchmark cutoffs allow for outcome comparisons between institutions, surgeons, and to monitor the introduction of novel minimally invasive DP techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P C Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis, - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J M A Toti
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - C Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis, - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Bolli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis, - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A T Billeter
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis, - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B P Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis, - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bencini L, Minuzzo A. Distal pancreatectomy with or without radical approach, vascular resections and splenectomy: Easier does not always mean easy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:1020-1032. [PMID: 37405088 PMCID: PMC10315131 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Because distal pancreatectomy (DP) has no reconstructive steps and less frequent vascular involvement, it is thought to be the easier counterpart of pancreaticoduodenectomy. This procedure has a high surgical risk and the overall incidences of perioperative morbidity (mainly pancreatic fistula), and mortality are still high, in addition to the challenges that accompany delayed access to adjuvant therapies (if any) and prolonged impairment of daily activities. Moreover, surgery to remove malignancy of the body or tail of the pancreas is associated with poor long-term oncological outcomes. From this perspective, new surgical approaches, and aggressive techniques, such as radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy and DP with celiac axis resection, could lead to improved survival in those affected by more locally advanced tumors. Conversely, minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopic and robotic surgeries and the avoidance of routine concomitant splenectomy have been developed to reduce the burden of surgical stress. The purpose of ongoing surgical research has been to achieve significant reductions in perioperative complications, length of hospital stays and the time between surgery and the beginning of adjuvant chemotherapy. Because a dedicated multidisciplinary team is crucial to pancreatic surgery, hospital and surgeon volumes have been confirmed to be associated with better outcomes in patients affected by benign, borderline, and malignant diseases of the pancreas. The purpose of this review is to examine the state of the art in distal pancreatectomies, with a special focus on minimally invasive approaches and oncological-directed techniques. The widespread reproducibility, cost-effectiveness and long-term results of each oncological procedure are also taken into deep consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lapo Bencini
- Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi Main Regional and University Hospital, Florence 50131, Italy
| | - Alessio Minuzzo
- Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi Main Regional and University Hospital, Florence 50131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kalt F, Mayr H, Gero D. Classification of Adverse Events in Adult Surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2023; 33:120-128. [PMID: 36720250 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1760821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Successful surgery combines quality (achievement of a positive outcome) with safety (avoidance of a negative outcome). Outcome assessment serves the purpose of quality improvement in health care by establishing performance indicators and allowing the identification of performance gaps. Novel surgical quality metric tools (benchmark cutoffs and textbook outcomes) provide procedure-specific ideal surgical outcomes in a subgroup of well-defined low-risk patients, with the aim of setting realistic and best achievable goals for surgeons and centers, as well as supporting unbiased comparison of surgical quality between centers and periods of time. Validated classification systems have been deployed to grade adverse events during the surgical journey: (1) the ClassIntra classification for the intraoperative period; (2) the Clavien-Dindo classification for the gravity of single adverse events; and the (3) Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for the sum of adverse events over a defined postoperative period. The failure to rescue rate refers to the death of a patient following one or more potentially treatable postoperative adverse event(s) and is a reliable proxy of the institutional safety culture and infrastructure. Complication assessment is undergoing digital transformation to decrease resource-intensity and provide surgeons with real-time pre- or intraoperative decision support. Standardized reporting of complications informs patients on their chances to realize favorable postoperative outcomes and assists surgical centers in the prioritization of quality improvement initiatives, multidisciplinary teamwork, surgical education, and ultimately, in the enhancement of clinical standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Kalt
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hemma Mayr
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Gero
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pfister M, Probst P, Müller PC, Antony P, Klotz R, Kalkum E, Merz D, Renzulli P, Hauswirth F, Muller MK. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad007. [PMID: 36967469 PMCID: PMC10040400 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Widespread implementation of the minimally invasive technique in pancreatic surgery has proven to be challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatic surgery with open pancreatic surgery using data obtained from RCTs. METHODS A literature search was done using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Web of Science; all available RCTs comparing minimally invasive pancreatic surgery and open pancreatic surgery in adults requiring elective distal pancreatectomy or partial pancreatoduodenectomy were included. Outcomes were mortality rate, general and pancreatic surgery specific morbidity rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Six RCTs with 984 patients were included; 99.0 per cent (486) of minimally invasive procedures were performed laparoscopically and 1.0 per cent (five) robotically. In minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, length of hospital stay (-1.3 days, -2 to -0.5, P = 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (-137 ml, -182 to -92, P < 0.001) were reduced. In the subgroup analysis, reduction in length of hospital stay was only present for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (-2 days, -2.3 to -1.7, P < 0.001). A minimally invasive approach showed reductions in surgical site infections (OR 0.4, 0.1 to 0.96, P = 0.040) and intraoperative blood loss (-131 ml, -173 to -89, P < 0.001) with a 75 min longer duration of surgery (42 to 108 min, P < 0.001) only in partial pancreatoduodenectomy. No significant differences were found with regards to mortality rate and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis presents level 1 evidence of reduced length of hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery compared with open pancreatic surgery. Morbidity rate and mortality rate were comparable, but longer duration of surgery in minimally invasive partial pancreatoduodenectomy hints that this technique in partial pancreatoduodenectomy is technically more challenging than in distal pancreatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Pfister
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pia Antony
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Rosa Klotz
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Kalkum
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Merz
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pietro Renzulli
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Münsterlingen, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Hauswirth
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Münsterlingen, Switzerland
| | - Markus K Muller
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Münsterlingen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wu Y, Li S, Yuan J, Zhang H, Wang M, Zhang Z, Qin R. Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery. Int J Surg 2023; 109:419-428. [PMID: 37093075 PMCID: PMC10389472 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benchmarking, a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons, is a recent concept in surgery. The objectives of this review are to examine the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking and its application in surgery. METHODS The literature about benchmarking was reviewed through an ever-narrowing search strategy, commencing from the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking to the application of benchmarking and experiences of benchmarking in surgery. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched until 20 September 2022, in the English language according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS In the first phase of the literature search, the development of benchmarking was identified. The definitions of benchmarking evolved from a surveying term to a novel quality-improvement tool to assess the best achievable results in surgery. In the second phase, a total of 23 studies were identified about benchmarking in surgery, including esophagectomy, hepatic surgery, pancreatic surgery, rectum resection, and bariatric surgery. All studies were multicenter analyses from national, international, or global expert centers. Most studies (87.0%) adopted the definition that benchmark was the 75th percentile of the median values of centers. Performance metrics to define benchmarks were clinically relevant intraoperative and postoperative outcome indicators. CONCLUSION Benchmarking in surgery is a novel quality-improvement tool to define and measure the best achievable results, establishing a meaningful reference to evaluate surgical performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Wu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Xu Q, Li P, Zhang H, Wang M, Liu Q, Liu W, Dai M. Identifying the preoperative factors predicting the surgical difficulty of robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:3823-3831. [PMID: 36690891 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09865-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated the preoperative factors predicting the surgical difficulty of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). This study aims to explore such factors and provide guidance on the selection of suitable patients to aid surgeons lacking extensive experience in RDP. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent RDP to identify preoperative factors predicting surgical difficulty. High surgical difficulty was defined by both operation time and intraoperative estimated blood loss exceeding their median, or by conversion to laparotomy. RESULTS A total of 161 patients were ultimately enrolled, including 51 patients with high levels of surgical difficulty. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex [OR (95% CI): 4.07 (1.77,9.40), p = 0.001], body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 OR (95% CI): 2.27 (1.03,5.00), p = 0.042], tumors located at the neck of the pancreas [OR (95% CI): 4.15 (1.49,11.56), p = 0.006] and splenic artery type B [OR (95% CI): 3.28 (1.09,9.91), p = 0.035] were independent risk factors for surgical difficulty. Regarding postoperative complications, high surgical difficulty was associated with the risk of overall complications and pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) (49.0% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.001; 39.2% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION Male sex, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, tumor located at the neck of the pancreas and splenic artery type B are associated with a high RDP difficulty level. These factors can be used preoperatively to assess the difficulty level of surgery, to help surgeons choose patients suitable for them and ensure surgical safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Pengyu Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Hanyu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Mengyi Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Qiaofei Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wenjing Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Menghua Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2023; 75:7-21. [PMID: 36378464 PMCID: PMC9834369 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01413-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Robotic surgery has become a promising surgical method in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery due to its three-dimensional visualization, tremor filtration, motion scaling, and better ergonomics. Numerous studies have explored the benefits of RDP over LDP in terms of perioperative safety and feasibility, but no consensus has been achieved yet. This article aimed to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of RDP and LDP for perioperative outcomes. By June 2022, all studies comparing RDP to LDP in the PubMed, the Embase, and the Cochrane Library database were systematically reviewed. According to the heterogeneity, fix or random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Odds ratio (OR), weighted mean differences (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was performed to explore potential sources of high heterogeneity and a trim and fill analysis was used to evaluate the impact of publication bias on the pooled results. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. RDP provides greater benefit than LDP for higher spleen preservation (OR 3.52 95% CI 2.62-4.73, p < 0.0001) and Kimura method (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.42-2.62, p < 0.0001) in benign and low-grade malignant tumors. RDP is associated with lower conversion to laparotomy (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.52, p < 0.00001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD - 0.57, 95% CI - 0.92 to - 0.21, p = 0.002), but it is more costly. In terms of postoperative complications, there was no difference between RDP and LDP except for 30-day mortality (RDP versus LDP, 0.1% versus 1.0%, p = 0.03). With the exception of its high cost, RDP appears to outperform LDP on perioperative outcomes and is technologically feasible and safe. High-quality prospective randomized controlled trials are advised for further confirmation as the quality of the evidence now is not high.
Collapse
|