Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer

Effects of Planned Stoma Before Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Endoscopically Obstructing Colorectal Cancer

PurposeIn order to investigate whether colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with endoscopic obstruction benefited from a planned stoma before neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT).MethodsPatients who were diagnosed with CRC with endoscopic obstruction at a single clinical center from January 2017 to April 2022 were retrospectively collected. Baseline characteristics and short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between the stoma group and the no stoma group. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22.0) software.ResultsA total of 51 CRC patients with endoscopic obstruction were included in this study. Eleven (21.6%) patients received a planned stoma before nCRT, and 40 (78.4%) patients were treated with immediate nCRT. The mean time from diagnosis to nCRT was 30.6 days for the stoma group and 11.9 days for the no stoma group. There was a significant delay in the initiation of nCRT in the stoma group (P < 0.05). In terms of complications, there was a statistical difference between the stoma group and the no stoma group (P < 0.05). Planned stoma before nCRT did not affect survival for patients with endoscopically obstructing CRC (P > 0.05).ConclusionA planned stoma caused delay in nCRT; the no stoma group was more likely to develop perforation or obstruction of the tumor during nCRT. A comprehensive assessment might be needed to determine whether a planned stoma was necessary in CRC patients with endoscopic obstruction.

The Role of Pre-Treatment Inflammatory Biomarkers in Predicting Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the predictive and prognostic value of pre-treatment systemic inflammatory markers in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (RC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone. Materials and Methods: A total of 79 patients with biopsy-confirmed locally advanced RC treated at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Pre-treatment blood-based inflammatory indices, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and hemoglobin levels, were recorded. Tumor response was assessed using the Ryan tumor regression grade (TRG), and associations between laboratory parameters, treatment response, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated. Results: Among 79 patients (mean age: 55.9 ± 11.98 years; 67.1% male), 57 received neoadjuvant CRT and 22 underwent short-course RT. Complete pathological response (pCR) was observed in 10 patients (12.7%). No statistically significant associations were found between baseline inflammatory markers and TRG, tumor differentiation, or pCR. ROC analysis revealed that none of the markers demonstrated significant discriminatory power for predicting tumor response or recurrence. However, a weak but statistically significant inverse correlation was identified between poor TRG response and higher baseline values of NLR, derived NLR, and PLR (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Inflammatory biomarkers such as NLR, PLR, and LMR, while easily accessible and cost-effective, did not demonstrate strong predictive or prognostic value in this cohort of RC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. These findings suggest that reliance solely on systemic inflammatory indices may be insufficient for predicting treatment outcomes, emphasizing the need for integrative models incorporating molecular and pathological markers.

The optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for patients with an unfavorable pathological response in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The focus of this study was to determine the optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who had an unfavorable pathological response, as well as to investigate the correlation between long-term outcomes and the duration of this interval.

Methods

The present study retrospectively analyzed patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by total mesorectal excision between (TME) January 2018 and September 2021. Patients included in this study had an unfavorable pathological response, confirmed as tumor regression grade (TRG) 2-3. X-tile analysis was subsequently conducted to determine the optimal cut-off value for the time interval between nCRT and surgery. Furthermore, Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate long-term survival.

Results

The study cohort comprised of 114 patients (51.35%) in the longer interval group (>8 weeks), while the remaining 108 patients (48.65%) belonged to the shorter interval group (≤8 weeks). Univariable and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses revealed that a longer interval time was identified as an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.01-4.55, P=0.048) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.09-3.77, P=0.025) among these patients. Moreover, patients in the longer interval group exhibited significantly worse OS and DFS compared to those in the shorter interval group (3-year OS: 87.2% vs 68.2%, P=0.001; 3-year DFS: 80.4% vs 62.7%, P=0.003). Furthermore, similar results were observed in subgroup analyses based on different TRG scores.

Conclusions

The surveillance and monitoring should be promptly conducted following nCRT in order to promptly identify patients with an unfavorable pathological response, who would benefit from timely radical surgery within 8 weeks.

Do not expect an endoluminal complete response to identify a pathologic complete response in rectal cancer!

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between endoluminal and pathologic complete response after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and identify predictors of a pathologic complete response.

METHOD

The anatomic pathology reports of 102 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by proctectomy between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed for the presence or absence of endoluminal complete response. The presence of endoluminal complete response was compared with the anatomopathological stage. The residual lesion area was compared with the final pathologic stage to identify predictors of complete response.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients, 20 (19.6 %) achieved a pathologic complete response (ypT0N0). Of these, 9 (45 %) did not achieve an endoluminal complete response. The presence of endoluminal complete response had a sensitivity of 55.00 %, specificity of 96.34 %, and accuracy of 88.24 % to identify ypT0N0. The presence of endoluminal complete response, residual lesion area ≤ 4 cm2, and tumor located in the mid-rectum were associated with pathologic complete response (ypT0N0).

CONCLUSION

Almost half of the patients who had a pathologic complete response did not achieve an endoluminal complete response. Tumors located in the mid-rectum with a residual size of ≤ 4 cm2 and the presence of endoluminal complete response were significantly associated with the achievement of ypT0N0.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiation Therapy Followed by Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience From Saudi Arabia

Background The 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), capecitabine-based long-course or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) eventually preceded or followed by induction or consolidation chemotherapy (CT) and resection represents the preferred regimen for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aims to report our experience as a large medical center in Saudi Arabia, with the efficacy of short-course radiation therapy followed by oxaliplatin-based CT in achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with LARC. Materials and methods This retrospective analysis encompassed 57 patients diagnosed with LARC at a large tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from June 2020 to December 2022. All participants underwent short-term radiotherapy (25 Grays (Gy) over fractions within one week) followed by CT with 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX), constituting the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Surgical intervention and total mesorectal excision were performed six to eight weeks post-preoperative treatment. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate. Results Of the study participants, 34 (60%) were males, with a mean age of 57.6 ± 13.9 years. Two-thirds (n = 37,65%) were classified as T3. The overall response rates were 12 (21%), 12 (21%), 24 (42%), and nine (16%), for complete response (CR), near-complete response (nCR), partial response (PR), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. The multivariable logistic regression model identified five independent predictors for overall CR after adjusting for disease-related factors: N-stage, the circumferential resection margin (CRM), average vascularity (AV), surgical procedure, and postoperative tumor size. Patients with N2 disease had an 18% lower chance of achieving CR (OR = 0.824; 95% CI: 0.634-0.974; p = 0.035). Positive CRM was linked to a 71% reduction in the probability of CR (OR = 0.268; 95% CI: 0.087-0.823; p = 0.021). Each 1 cm increase in AV corresponded to a 28.5% increase in the likelihood of complete response (OR = 1.285; 95% CI: 1.029-1.605; p = 0.027). Patients who underwent AR had 2.8 times greater chances of achieving CR than those who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) (OR = 2.801; 95% CI: 1.057-9.324; p = 0.044). Lastly, each 1 cm increase in postoperative tumor size was associated with a 92.5% reduction in the odds of CR (OR = 0.074; 95% CI: 0.017-0.330; p = 0.001). Conclusions The current study supports the efficacy of TNT for treating LARC, with a pCR rate of 21% and near-complete response in nearly half of the patients with LARC. Significant predictors of pCR included N-stage, CRM status, AV size, and surgical approach. These insights could refine patient selection for TNT and inform future strategies to optimize treatment outcomes in rectal cancer. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted.

Tumor response rates based on initial TNM stage and tumor size in locally advanced rectal cancer: a useful tool for shared decision-making

BACKGROUND

It is accepted that tumor stage and size can influence response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Studies on organ preservation to date have included a wide variety of size and TNM stage tumors. The aim of this study was to report tumor response based on each relevant TNM stage and tumor size.

METHODS

Patients treated with LARC from 2014 to 2021 with cT2-3NxM0 tumors who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy were included. Tumors were staged and tumor size calculated on pelvic MRI at the time of diagnosis (cTNM). Tumor size was based on the largest dimension taken on the longest axis of each tumor. Clinical response was defined on the basis of post-treatment pelvic MRI and pathological response following surgery, when performed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics™, version 20. Data from 432 patients were analyzed as follows: cT2N0 (n = 51), cT2N+ (n = 36), cT3N0 (n = 76), cT3N+ (n = 270).

RESULTS

The rate of complete or near-complete response (cCR or nCR) varied from 77% in cT2N0 ≤ 3 cm to 20% in cT3N+ > 4 cm. Organ preservation without recurrence at 2 years was achieved in 86% of patients with cT2N0, 50% in cT2N+, 39% in cT3N0, and 12% in cT3N+.

CONCLUSION

There is significant variation in tumor response according to tumor stage and size. Tumor response appears inversely proportional to increasing TNM stage and tumor size. This data can support both refinement of selective patient recruitment to organ preservation programs and shared decision-making.

Factors associated with pathological complete remission after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a real-world clinical setting

Objective

This study aims to identify factors associated with achieving a pathological complete remission (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Methods

We conducted a cohort analysis of 171 LARC patients who underwent curative resection post-nCRT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 2015 and December 2021. The data encompassed clinical and pathological information. Univariate and binary logistic regression multivariate analyses were employed to examine the factors influencing pCR achievement after nCRT. Kappa value tests were utilized to compare clinical staging after nCRT with postoperative pathological staging.

Results

Postoperative histopathology revealed that of the 171 patients, 40 (23.4%) achieved TRG 0 grade (pCR group), while 131 (76.6%) did not achieve pCR, comprising 36 TRG1, 42 TRG2, and 53 TRG3 cases. Univariate analysis indicated that younger age (p=0.008), reduced tumor occupation of intestinal circumference (p =0.008), specific pathological types (p=0.011), and lower pre-nCRT CEA levels (p=0.003) correlated with pCR attainment. Multivariate analysis identified these factors as independent predictors of pCR: younger age (OR=0.946, p=0.004), smaller tumor occupation of intestinal circumference (OR=2.809, p=0.046), non-mucinous adenocarcinoma pathological type (OR=10.405, p=0.029), and lower pre-nCRT serum CEA levels (OR=2.463, p=0.031). Clinical re-staging post-nCRT compared to postoperative pathological staging showed inconsistent MRI T staging (Kappa=0.012, p=0.718, consistency rate: 35.1%) and marginally consistent MRI N staging (Kappa=0.205, p=0.001, consistency rate: 59.6%).

Conclusion

LARC patients with younger age, presenting with smaller tumor circumferences in the intestinal lumen, lower pre-nCRT serum CEA levels, and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma are more likely to achieve pCR after nCRT. The study highlights the need for improved accuracy in clinical re-staging assessments after nCRT in LARC.

Short-term outcomes of short- and long-course chemoradiotherapy before total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal tumors: A single-center study in Taiwan utilizing propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal tumors are typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Short-course chemoradiotherapy (SCRT, 2500 cGy in five fractions) is a convenient alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy with long-course radiotherapy (CCRT, 4500 cGy in 25 fractions) without sacrificing efficacy. We aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of SCRT and CCRT in patients with mid- and low- rectal tumors who underwent total mesorectal excision using real-world data.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy from 2011 to 2022. We analyzed the clinicopathological findings and prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival in the SCRT and CCRT groups and compared the outcomes using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Among the 66 patients in the two groups, no disparities were noted in the demographic features, pathological remission, or downstaging rates. Nonetheless, the SCRT group exhibited superior 3-year disease-free survival (81.8% vs 62.1%, p = 0.011), whereas the overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups. The initial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and neoadjuvant SCRT were associated with the recurrence rates [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13-4.10; HR = 0.19-0.74], but the harvested lymph node count was not (HR = 0.51-1.97).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, SCRT combined with four cycles of FOLFOX was shown to enhance short-term disease-free survival. Factors impacting recurrence include the initial CEA level and SCRT, but not the harvested lymph node count.

Neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer: Where we are and where we are going

Locally advanced rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach based on total neoadjuvant treatment with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (ChT), followed by deferred surgery. Currently, alternatives to the standard total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) are being explored, such as new ChT regimens or the introduction of immunotherapy. With standard TNT, up to a third of patients may achieve a complete pathological response (CPR), potentially avoiding surgery. However, as of now, we lack predictive markers of response that would allow us to define criteria for a conservative organ strategy. The presence of mutations, genes, or new imaging tests is helping to define these criteria. An example of this is the diffusion coefficient in the diffusion-weighted sequence of magnetic resonance imaging and the integration of this imaging technique into RT treatment. This allows for the monitoring of the evolution of this coefficient over successive RT sessions, helping to determine which patients will achieve CPR or those who may require intensification of neoadjuvant therapy.

Stage IV Rectal Cancer and Timing of Surgical Approach

Liver metastases are seen in at least 60% of patients with colorectal cancer at some point during the course of their disease. The management of both primary and liver disease is uniquely challenging in rectal cancer due to competing treatments and complex sequence of treatments depending on the clinical presentation of disease. Recently, several novel concepts are shaping new treatment paradigms, including changes in timing, sequence, and duration of therapies combined with potential deescalation of treatment components. Overall, the treatment of this clinical scenario mandates multidisciplinary evaluation and personalization of care; however, there is still considerable debate regarding the timing of liver metastasectomy in the context of the overall treatment plan. Herein, we will discuss the current literature on management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, current treatment approaches with respect to chemotherapy, and role of hepatic artery infusion therapy.

High Rates of Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer with Papillon Contact X-ray Radiotherapy: Results from a Swiss Cohort

Rectal cancer typically necessitates a combination of radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, and surgery. The associated functional disorders and reduction in quality of life have led to an increasing interest in organ preservation strategies. Response strongly correlates with RT dose, but dose escalation with external beam remains limited even with modern external beam RT techniques because of toxicity of the surrounding tissues. This study reports on the use of Papillon, an endocavitary Radiotherapy device, in the treatment of rectal cancer. The device delivers low energy X-rays, allowing for safe dose escalation and better complete response rate. Between January 2015 and February 2024, 24 rectal cancer patients were treated with the addition of a boost delivered by Papillon to standard RT, with or without chemotherapy, in an upfront organ preservation strategy. After a median follow-up (FU) of 43 months, the organ preservation rate was 96% (23/24), and the local relapse rate was 8% (2/24). None of our patients developed grade 3 or more toxicities. Our results demonstrate that the addition of Papillon contact RT provides a high rate of local remission with sustained long-term organ preservation, offering a promising alternative to traditional surgical approaches in patients with rectal cancer.

Evaluation of the prognostic impact of pathologic tumor regression grade on patients with colorectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of the pathological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in rectal cancer (RC) remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the predictive value of the response to CRT that was derived from an evaluation of the histological findings (whole-section vs. representative-section sampling) and attempted to determine an objective cut-off value for the tumor regression grade (TRG).

METHODS

We examined the association of the TRG with the outcomes (recurrence-free survival [RFS] and overall survival [OS]) of 78 patients with RC. Patients with RC treated with preoperative CRT were divided into development (30 cases) and validation (48 cases) cohorts. The TRG was classified as grades I (Ia, Ib), II, and III. The cut-off value was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The TRG determined from whole-section sampling versus representative-section sampling was more strongly correlated with patient survival. We found that in both cohorts, patients with a cut-off value of <73% had a poor prognosis. Finally, the cut-off value was found to be an independent predictive factor in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The TRG that was used to evaluate patients with RC who underwent preoperative CRT was an independent prognostic factor for outcome.

Predicting survival in locally advanced rectal cancer with effective chemoradiotherapy response

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer patients often display favorable responses and favorable oncologic outcomes. Due to the low recurrence rate, there is scarcity of studies investigating the prognostic factors influencing their survival. Therefore, our study sought to assess the prognostic factors associated with survival in rectal cancer patients who achieved either a pathologic complete response or a pathologic stage I after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with radical resection.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from cohort of 1394 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision from January 2008 to April 2017. Finally, we selected 474 (34.2 %) who exhibited either a pathologic complete response or attained pathologic stage I following the treatment. Subsequently, we analyzed the prognostic factors influencing disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 161 (34 %) achieved a pathologic complete response. Our analysis revealed that circumferential resection margin and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for disease-free survival (p = 0.011, p = 0.022). Furthermore, factors influencing overall survival included the clinical N stage and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.035, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the circumferential resection margin, clinical N stage, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for survival in patients showing good response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. For patients with a positive circumferential resection margin and clinical N (+) stage, intensive follow-up might be needed to achieve favorable oncologic outcomes. Also, we recommend considering adjuvant chemotherapy as a beneficial treatment approach for these patients.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: Which Regimens to Use?

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a novel strategy for rectal cancer that administers both (chemo)radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before surgery. TNT is expected to improve treatment compliance, tumor regression, organ preservation, and oncologic outcomes. Multiple TNT regimens are currently available with various combinations of the treatments including induction or consolidation chemotherapy, triplet or doublet chemotherapy, and long-course chemoradiotherapy or short-course radiotherapy. Evidence on TNT is rapidly evolving with new data on clinical trials, and no definitive consensus has been established on which regimens to use for improving outcomes. Clinicians need to understand the advantages and limitations of the available regimens for multidisciplinary decision making. This article reviews currently available evidence on TNT for rectal cancer. A decision making flow chart is provided for tailor-made use of TNT regimens based on tumor location and local and systemic risk.

Non-operative management in low-lying rectal cancers undergoing chemoradiation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACTRT) wait-and-watch Strategy (WWS) in distal rectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients from December 2012 to 2019 diagnosed with distal rectal tumors (T2-T4 N0-N+) having a complete or near-complete response (cCR or nCR, respectively) post-NACTRT and wishing for the non-surgical treatment option of WWS were included in this study. Patients were observed with 3 monthly magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs), sigmoidoscopies, and digital rectal examination for 2 years and 6 monthly thereafter. Organ preservation rate (OPR), local regrowth rate (LRR), non-regrowth recurrence-free survival (NR-RFS) and overall survival (OAS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with LRR were identified on univariate and multivariate analysis using the log-rank test (P < 0.05 significant).

RESULTS

Sixty-one consecutive patients post-NACTRT achieving cCR[44 (72%)] and nCR[17 (28%)], respectively, were identified. All patients received pelvic radiotherapy at a dose of 45-50Gy conventional fractionation and concurrent capecitabine. An additional boost dose with either an external beam or brachytherapy was given to 39 patients. At a median follow-up of 39 months, 11 (18%) patients had local regrowth, of which seven were salvaged with surgery and the rest are alive with the disease, as they refused surgery. The overall OPR, NR-RFS, and OS were 83%, 95%, and 98%, respectively. Seven (11%) patients developed distant metastasis, of which six underwent metastatectomy and are alive and well. LRR was higher in patients with nCR versus cCR (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The WWS is a safe non-operative alternative management for selected patients attaining cCR/nCR after NACTRT with excellent outcomes.

Sense and non-sense of imaging in the era of organ preservation for rectal cancer

This review summarizes the current applications and benefits of imaging modalities for organ preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer. The concept of organ preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer has revolutionized the way rectal cancer is managed. Initially, organ preservation was limited to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who needed neoadjuvant therapy to reduce tumor size before surgery and achieved complete response. However, neoadjuvant therapy is now increasingly utilized for smaller and less aggressive tumors to achieve primary organ preservation. Additionally, more intensive neoadjuvant strategies are employed to improve complete response rates and increase the chances of successful organ preservation. The selection of patients for organ preservation is a critical component of treatment, and imaging techniques such as digital rectal exam, endoscopy, and MRI are commonly used for this purpose. In this review, we provide an overview of what imaging modalities should be chosen and how they can aid in the selection and follow-up of patients undergoing organ-preserving strategies.

Word of caution: Rectal cancer without response to neoadjuvant treatment - Do not wait for surgery

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that prolonging the interval to surgery in non-responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) could lead to worse oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

Rectal adenocarcinoma patients with poor tumor response to nCRT (AJCC tumor regression grade 3) were selected. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated according to the time interval between completion of nCRT and surgery.

RESULTS

Among 56 non-responders, 28 patients surgically treated ≥8 weeks after completion of nCRT had worse disease-free survival (31% vs. 49%, p ​= ​0.05) and worse overall survival (34% vs. 53%, p ​= ​0.02) compared to patients <8 weeks. Using the three different intervals (≥12 weeks, 6-12 weeks, and< 6 weeks), waiting longer was consistently associated with worse overall (23% vs. 48% vs. 63%, p ​= ​0.02) and worse cancer-specific survival (35% vs. 61% vs. 71%, p ​= ​0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSION

For rectal cancer patients who are non-responders to nCRT, delay of surgery may lead to worse oncologic outcomes.

Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant treatment strategies for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance.

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance.

Time Interval Between the End of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Elective Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the CRONOS Study

Importance

The treatment for extraperitoneal locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Robust evidence on the optimal time interval between NAT completion and surgery is lacking.

Objective

To assess the association of time interval between NAT completion and TME with short- and long-term outcomes. It was hypothesized that longer intervals increase the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate without increasing perioperative morbidity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included patients with LARC from 6 referral centers who completed NAT and underwent TME between January 2005 and December 2020. The cohort was divided into 3 groups depending on the time interval between NAT completion and surgery: short (≤8 weeks), intermediate (>8 and ≤12 weeks), and long (>12 weeks). The median follow-up duration was 33 months. Data analyses were conducted from May 1, 2021, to May 31, 2022. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to homogenize the analysis groups.

Exposure

Long-course chemoradiotherapy or short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery.

Main outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was pCR. Other histopathologic results, perioperative events, and survival outcomes constituted the secondary outcomes.

Results

Among the 1506 patients, 908 were male (60.3%), and the median (IQR) age was 68.8 (59.4-76.5) years. The short-, intermediate-, and long-interval groups included 511 patients (33.9%), 797 patients (52.9%), and 198 patients (13.1%), respectively. The overall pCR was 17.2% (259 of 1506 patients; 95% CI, 15.4%-19.2%). When compared with the intermediate-interval group, no association was observed between time intervals and pCR in short-interval (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-1.01) and long-interval (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.73-1.61) groups. The long-interval group was significantly associated with lower risk of bad response (tumor regression grade [TRG] 2-3; OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91), systemic recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96), higher conversion risk (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.62-6.07), minor postoperative complications (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04-1.97), and incomplete mesorectum (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.02-3.50) when compared with the intermediate-interval group.

Conclusions and Relevance

Time intervals longer than 12 weeks were associated with improved TRG and systemic recurrence but may increase surgical complexity and minor morbidity.

Construction and Evaluation of Nomogram for Hematological Indicators to Predict Pathological Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective study was conducted by developing prediction models to evaluate the association between hematological indexes, their changes during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), and tumor pathological response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data of 202 patients who received NCRT and radical surgery in Sichuan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and logistic multivariate regression analyses were used to identify hematological indexes with predictive significance. The independent risk factors were imported into the R software, and a nomogram prediction model was developed. The bootstrap method and ROC curve were used to evaluate the discriminative degree of the model.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis demonstrated age, tumor diameter, preoperative T, distance from tumor to the anal verge, CEA before NCRT, preoperative CEA, lymphocyte changes, platelet changes, and pathology of rectal cancer after NCRT were associated. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, tumor distance from the anus, preoperative CEA, lymphocyte changes, and platelet changes were independent risk factors. The independent risk factors were imported into the R software to construct a nomogram model. The area under the ROC was 0.76, and the slope of the calibration curve of the nomogram was close to 1.

CONCLUSION

A low preoperative CEA level, a young age, a high tumor from the anal verge, the maintenance of circulating lymphocyte level, and a decreased platelet level after NCRT are important factors for favorable outcomes after NCRT. Developing a nomogram prediction model with good discrimination and consistency can provide some guidance for predicting pathological responses after NCRT.

Top Colorectal Articles from 2021 to Inform Your Cancer Practice

Multimodality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is the standard of care. Treatments include surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, with medical therapies now being favored in the neoadjuvant setting. Various regimens continue to be studied and defined in prospective randomized trials. The PRODIGE 23 and RAPIDO trials showed improved disease-free survival and pathologic complete response rates for split chemotherapy/radiation treatment and short-course radiation with consolidation chemotherapy, respectively; both compared with traditional neoadjuvant long course chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, new regimens are yielding a higher rate of complete clinical response, allowing for non-operative management. Circulating tumor DNA provides a potential novel option for monitoring response to treatment and rectal cancer surveillance. This manuscript summarizes some of the key clinical trials and studies that are defining clinical practice.

Does Sarcopenia Predict Local Response Rates After Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND

The predictive value of sarcopenia for tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and pathological tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected database. Univariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between sarcopenia and tumor response.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at 2 tertiary care centers.

PATIENTS

Participants were patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/4, N0/+) between 2007 and 2018.

INTERVENTION

Sarcopenia was diagnosed using sex-specific cutoffs of lean muscle mass. Using the initial staging CT, lean muscle mass was estimated using the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle at the level of the third lumbar vertebra, normalized for patient height.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was pathological tumor regression grade, defined as good (tumor regression grade 0/1) vs poor (tumor regression grade 2/3).

RESULTS

The study included 167 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with a median age of 60 (20-91) years, with 132 in the nonsarcopenia group and 35 in the sarcopenia group. Eighty-nine percent of patients had stage 3 cancer. Nine patients (5.4%) had a complete clinical response, 1 patient did not respond to treatment and opted for nonoperative management, and the remaining 157 patients (94.0%) proceeded to surgery. Pathological data revealed no significant difference between good tumor regression grade patients in the sarcopenia group compared with the nonsarcopenia group. Univariate analysis revealed BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 to be a risk factor for good tumor regression grade ( p = 0.002).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective design and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is not a predictor of poor neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Increasing BMI was associated with good tumor regression grade. Future multicentered studies are warranted to validate this finding. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C78 .

LA SARCOPENIA PREDICE LAS TASAS DE RESPUESTA LOCAL DESPUS DE LA QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO

ANTECEDENTES:El valor predictivo de la sarcopenia para la respuesta tumoral a la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante no está claro.OBJETIVO:Este estudio investiga la asociación entre la sarcopenia y el grado de regresión tumoral patológica después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo a partir de una base de datos recolectada prospectivamente. Se realizó una regresión logística univariante para evaluar la asociación entre la sarcopenia y la respuesta tumoral.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en dos centros de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante por cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (T3/4, N0/+) entre 2007-2018.INTERVENCIÓNES:La sarcopenia se diagnosticó utilizando puntos de corte de masa muscular magra específicos por género. Utilizando la tomografía computarizada de estadificación inicial, se estimó la masa muscular magra utilizando el área transversal del músculo psoas a nivel de la tercera vértebra lumbar, normalizada para la altura del paciente.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:El criterio principal de valoración fue el grado de regresión tumoral patológica, definido como bueno (grado de regresión tumoral 0/1) frente a malo (grado de regresión tumoral 2/3).RESULTADOS:El estudio incluyó a 167 pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado con una mediana de edad de 60 años (20-91), 132 en el grupo sin sarcopenia y 35 en el grupo con sarcopenia. Ochenta y nueve por ciento estaban en etapa III. Seis pacientes (5,4%) tuvieron respuesta clínica completa sostenida, un paciente no respondió al tratamiento y optó por manejo conservador, los 157 restantes (94,0%) procedieron a cirugía. Los datos patológicos no revelaron diferencias significativas entre los pacientes con buen grado de regresión tumoral en el grupo de sarcopenia en comparación con el grupo sin sarcopenia. El análisis univariado reveló que un IMC ≥25 kg/m2 era un factor de riesgo para un buen grado de regresión tumoral (p = 0,002).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIÓNES:La sarcopenia no es un predictor de mala respuesta a la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado. El aumento del IMC se asoció con un buen grado de regresión tumoral. Se justifican futuros estudios multicéntricos para validar este hallazgo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C78 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Optimal waiting period to surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectum cancer: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The optimal waiting period after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancers is still controversial. The literature has different results regarding the effect of waiting periods on clinical and oncological outcomes. We aimed to investigate the effects of these different waiting periods on clinical, pathological, and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2018, a total of 139 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, who were treated in the Department of General Surgery at the Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, were enrolled in the study. The patients were split into three groups according to waiting time for surgery after neoadjuvant treatment: group 1 (n = 51) included patients that have 7 weeks and less (≤ 7 weeks) time interval, group 2 (n = 45) 8 to 10 weeks (8-10 weeks), group 3 (n = 43) 11 weeks and above (11 weeks ≤). Their database records, which were entered prospectively, were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were 83 (59.7%) males and 56 (40.3%) females. The median age was 60 years, and there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding age, gender, BMI, ASA score, ECOG performance score, tumor location, and preoperative CEA values. Also, we found no significant differences regarding operation times, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification, severe early postoperative complications (CD 3 and above) were observed in 9 patients. The complete pathological response (pCR, ypT0N0) was observed in 21 (15.1%) patients. The groups had no significant difference regarding 3-year disease-free and 3-year overall survival (p = 0.3, p = 0.8, respectively). Local recurrence was observed in 12 of 139 (8.6%) patients and distant metastases occurred in 30 of 139 (21.5%) patients during the follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of both local recurrence and distant metastasis (p = 0.98, p = 0.43, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The optimal time for postoperative complications and sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is 8-10 weeks. The different waiting periods do not affect disease-free and overall survival. While long-term waiting time does not make a difference in pathological complete response rates, it negatively affects the TME quality rate.

Rectal Cancer: Clinical and Molecular Predictors of a Complete Response to Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer may increase pathological complete response rates, potentially allowing for a nonoperative approach.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify patient and tumor characteristics that predict a complete response following total neoadjuvant therapy.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a university-based National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.

PATIENTS

The patients include those with stage 2 or 3 rectal adenocarcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions included total neoadjuvant therapy, total mesorectal excision, and nonoperative management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Complete response was defined as either patients with a clinical complete response undergoing nonoperative management who remained cancer-free or patients undergoing surgery with a pathological complete response.

RESULTS

Among 102 patients, median age was 54 years, 69% were male, median carcinoembryonic antigen level was 3.0 ng/mL, and the median distance of the tumor above the anorectal ring was 3 cm. Thirty-eight (37%) patients had a complete response, including 15 of 18 (83%) nonoperative patients who remained cancer free at a median of 22 months (range, 7-48 months) and 23 of 84 (27%) patients who underwent surgery and had a pathological complete response. The incomplete response group consisted of 61 patients who underwent initial surgery and 3 nonoperative patients with regrowth. There were no differences in gender, T-stage, or tumor location between groups. Younger age (median, 49 vs 55 years), normal carcinoembryonic antigen (71% vs 41%), clinical node-negative (24% vs 9%), smaller tumors (median 3.9 vs 5.4 cm), and wild-type p53 (79% vs 47%) and SMAD4 (100% vs 81%) were more likely to have a complete response (all p < 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study with a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy, more than one-third will achieve a pathological complete response or sustained clinical complete response with nonoperative management, making oncological resection superfluous in these patients. Smaller, wild-type p53 and SMAD4, and clinically node-negative cancers are predictive features of a complete response. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B889 .

CNCER DE RECTO PREDICTORES CLNICOS Y MOLECULARES DE UNA RESPUESTA COMPLETA A LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE TOTAL

ANTECEDENTES:La terapia neoadyuvante total en el cáncer de recto puede aumentar las tasas de respuesta patológica completa y permitir potencialmente un enfoque no quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue identificar las características tanto del paciente y del tumor que logren predecir una respuesta completa después de la terapia neoadyuvante total.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en un Centro Integral de Cáncer designado por el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer con sede universitaria.PACIENTES:Los pacientes incluyen aquellos con adenocarcinoma de recto en estadio 2 o 3.INTERVENCIONES:Terapia neoadyuvante total, escisión total del mesorrecto, manejo conservador no quirúrgico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La respuesta completa se definió como pacientes con una respuesta clínica completa sometidos a tratamiento no quirúrgico que permanecieron libres de cáncer o pacientes sometidos a cirugía con una respuesta patológica completa.RESULTADOS:Entre 102 pacientes, la mediana de edad fue de 54 años, el 69% fueron hombres, la mediana del nivel de antígeno carcinoembrionario fue de 3.0 ng/ml y la mediana de la distancia del tumor por encima del anillo anorrectal fue de 3 cm. Thirty-eight (37%) pacientes tuvieron una respuesta completa que incluyó a 15 de 18 (83%) pacientes con manejo no operatorio y que permanecieron libres de cáncer en una mediana de 22 meses (rango 7- 48 meses) y 23 de 84 (27%) pacientes que fueron sometidos a cirugía y tuvieron una respuesta patológica completa. El grupo de respuesta incompleta consistió en 61 pacientes que fueron sometidos inicialmente a cirugía y 3 pacientes no quirúrgicos con recrecimiento. No se encontró diferencias de género, estadio T o ubicación del tumor entre los grupos. Edad más joven (mediana 49 frente a 55), antígeno carcinoembrionario normal (71% frente a 41%), ganglios clínicos negativos (24% frente a 9%), tumores más pequeños (mediana de 3,9 frente a 5,4 cm) y p53 de tipo salvaje (79 % vs 47%) y SMAD4 (100% vs 81%) tenían más probabilidades de tener una respuesta completa (todos p < 0,05).LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo y con un tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con cáncer de recto tratados con terapia neoadyuvante total, más de un tercio logrará una respuesta patológica completa o una respuesta clínica completa sostenida con manejo no operatorio, logrando que la resección oncológica sea superflua en estos pacientes. Los cánceres más pequeños, clínicamente con ganglios negativos, con p53 de tipo salvaje y SMAD4, son características predictoras de una respuesta completa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B889 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

Expression Levels of GHRH-Receptor, pAkt and Hsp90 Predict 10-Year Overall Survival in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Background: Rectal cancer constitutes nearly one-third of all colorectal cancer diagnoses, and certain clinical and molecular markers have been studied as potential prognosticators of patient survival. The main objective of our study was to investigate the relationship between the expression intensities of certain proteins, including growth-hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRH-R), Hsp90, Hsp16.2, p-Akt and SOUL, in specimens of locally advanced rectal cancer patients, as well as the time to metastasis and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates. We also investigated whether these outcome measures were associated with the presence of other clinical parameters. Methods: In total, 109 patients were investigated retrospectively. Samples of pretreatment tumors were stained for the proteins GHRH-R, Hsp90, Hsp16.2, p-Akt and SOUL using immunhistochemistry methods. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to show the relationships between the intensity of expression of biomarkers, clinical parameters, the time to metastasis and the 10-year OS rate. Results: High levels of p-Akt, GHRH-R and Hsp90 were associated with a significantly decreased 10-year OS rate (p = 0.001, p = 0.000, p = 0.004, respectively) and high expression levels of p-Akt and GHRH-R were correlated with a significantly shorter time to metastasis. Tumors localized in the lower third of the rectum were linked to both a significantly longer time to metastasis and an improved 10-year OS rate. Conclusions: Hsp 90, pAkt and GHRH-R as well as the lower-third localization of the tumor were predictive of the 10-year OS rate in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. The GHRH-R and Hsp90 expression levels were independent prognosticators of OS. Our results imply that GHRH-R could play a particularly important role both as a molecular biomarker and as a target for the anticancer treatment of advanced rectal cancer.

Early versus delayed surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery, is the mainstay of managing locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, the optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant therapy is not defined clearly.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases was conducted. 6-8 weeks were used as a cut-off to define early and delayed surgery groups. Overall Survival (OS) was the primary outcome, whereas pathological complete resolution (pCR), R0 resection, anastomotic leak, perioperative mortality, pulmonary complications, and major complication (> Clavien-Dindo grade 2) rates were secondary outcomes. Cohort studies and national registry bases studies were analysed separately. Survival data were pooled as Hazard Ratio (HR) and the rest as Odds Ratio (OR). According to heterogeneity, fixed-effect or random-effect models were used.

RESULTS

Twelve retrospective studies, one RCT, and six registry-based studies (13,600 participants) were included. Pooled analysis of cohort studies showed no difference in OS (HR 1.03, CI 0.91-1.16), pCR (OR 0.98, CI 0.80-1.20), R0 resection (OR 0.90, CI 0.55-I.45), mortality (OR 1.03, CI 0.59-1.77), pulmonary complications (OR 1.26, CI 0.97-1.64) or major complication rates (OR 1.29, CI 0.96-1.73). Delayed surgery led to increased leak (OR 1.48, CI 1.11-1.97). Analysis of registry studies showed that the delayed group had a better pCR rate (OR 1.12, CI 1.01-1.24), with no improvement in survival (HR 1.01, CI 0.92-1.10). Delayed surgery was associated with increased mortality (OR 1.35, CI 1.07-1.69) and major complication rate (OR 1.55, CI 1.20-2.01). Available RCT reported surgical outcomes only.

CONCLUSION

National registry-based studies' analysis shows that delay in surgery is riskier and leads to higher mortality and major complication rates. Further, well-designed RCTs are required.

Changing patterns of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A narrative review

Standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has been the multidisciplinary approach of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. This reduces the local recurrence rate, but the challenge of distant metastasis still persists. The improvement in treatment approach has always been the focus of clinical research and studies have been conducted worldwide in recent years. On one hand, evidence suggests that increasing the intensity of treatment can result in better tumor regression, for example by adding a second drug to the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or extending the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, or incorporating chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. On the other hand, neoadjuvant immunotherapy and selective omission of neoadjuvant radiotherapy may improve the quality of life of patients. In this article, we review the key clinical research progresses in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, hoping to provide some valuable views on the individualized treatment for rectal cancer.

Effect of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery on disease recurrence and survival in rectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of surgery following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is controversial. This trial aimed to assess disease recurrence and survival rates between patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC) who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) after a waiting interval of 8 weeks or less (classic interval; CI) versus more than 8 weeks (long interval; LI) following preoperative CRT.

METHODS

This was a phase III, single-centre, randomized clinical trial. Patients with LARC situated within 12 cm of the anal verge (T3-T4 or N+ disease) were randomized to undergo TME within or after 8 weeks after CRT.

RESULTS

Between January 2006 and January 2017, 350 patients were randomized, 175 to each group. As of February 2022, the median follow-up time was 80 (6-174) months. Among the 322 included patients (CI, 159; LI, 163) the cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence at 5 years was 10.1 per cent in the CI group and 6.9 per cent in the LI group (P = 0.143). The cumulative incidence of distant metastasis at 5 years was 30.8 per cent in the CI group and 18.6 per cent in the LI group (sub-HR = 1.78; 95 per cent c.i. 1.14 to 2.78, P = 0.010). The disease-free survival (DFS) in each group was 59.7 and 69.9 per cent respectively (P = 0.157), and overall survival (OS) rates at 5 years were 73.6 versus 77.9 per cent (P = 0.476).

CONCLUSION

Incidence of distant metastasis decreased with an interval between CRT and surgery exceeding 8 weeks, but this did not impact on DFS or OS.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03287843 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Downstaging in Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy has not been widely evaluated as an alternative to traditional long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the oncological and short-term outcomes between short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective propensity-matched study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in a colorectal department at a tertiary care oncology center in India.

PATIENTS

There were 173 patients. Group A had 47 patients and group B had 126 patients. A 1:2.7 matching was done for age, sex, distance of tumor from the anal verge, sphincter preservation surgeries, MRI-based pretreatment T stage, and circumferential resection margin.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions performed were short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy (group A) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (group B) in locally advanced rectal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary measures were pathological circumferential resection margin positivity, downstaging, tumor regression grade, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 52% had a positive circumferential resection margin on MRI, 57% had low rectal tumors, and 20% had T4 tumors. Distribution of rectal surgeries was similar between the 2 groups. pT downstaging and tumor regression scores were significantly better in group B ( p = 0.028 and 0.026). Pathological circumferential resection margin, distal resection margin, and nodal yield were similar. On multivariate analysis, pretreatment N status was the only independent predictive factor for pathological circumferential resection margin status. Grade 3 to 4 Clavien-Dindo complications, anastomotic leak rates, and hospital stay were similar between the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study. Although propensity matching was performed, selection bias cannot be eliminated completely, as seen in the difference in the surgical approaches between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort containing a significant portion of MRI circumferential resection margin-positive low rectal cancers, short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery resulted in lower T downstaging and lower tumor regression scores compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, but pathological circumferential margin status, distal resection margin, nodal yield, and perioperative morbidity were similar between the 2 groups. This suggests that short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy could be a viable alternative to long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancers. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 .

REDUCCIN DEL ESTADIO EN LOS CNCERES RECTALES AVANZADOS UNA COMPARACIN DE PROPENSIN EQUIPARADA ENTRE LA RADIACIN DE CICLO CORTO SEGUIDA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA Y LA QUIMIO RADIACIN DE CICLO LARGO

ANTECEDENTES:La radioterapia de ciclo corto seguida de quimioterapia no ha sido evaluada ampliamente como una alternativa a la tradicional quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:Estudio que compara los resultados oncológicos y a corto plazo entre la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia y la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio comparado de propensión de manera retrospectiva.AJUSTE:Departamento colorrectal en un centro de atención oncológica de tipo terciario en la India.PACIENTES:Hubo 173 pacientes. El grupo A tenía 47 y el grupo B tenía 126 pacientes. Se realizó una comparación de 1: 2,7 para edad, sexo, distancia del tumor desde el margen anal, cirugías de preservación del esfínter, estadio T previo al tratamiento basada en resonancia magnética y margen de resección circunferencial (CRM).INTERVENCIONES:Radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia (grupo A) y quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo (grupo B) en cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (LARC).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Positividad histopatológica de CRM, reducción del estadio tumoral, grado de regresión tumoral, complicaciones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS:El 52% de los pacientes han tenido un margen de resección circunferencial positivo en la resonancia magnética, 57% de tumores rectales bajos, 20% de tumores T4. La distribución de cirugías rectales fue similar entre los 2 grupos. Las puntuaciones de regresión tumoral y de reducción del estadio de pT fueron significativamente mejores en el grupo B ( p = 0.028 y 0.026 respectivamente). El margen de resección circunferencial patológico, el margen de resección distal y los ganglios arrojados fueron similares. En el análisis multivariado, el estadio N previo al tratamiento fue el único factor predictivo independiente para el estadio de pCRM. Las complicaciones Clavien-Dindo de grado 3-4, las tasas de fuga anastomótica y la estancia hospitalaria fueron similares entre los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Retrospectiva; aunque la propensión coincide, existe potencial sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:En una cohorte que contenía una porción significativa de cánceres rectales bajos con margen de resección circunferencial positivo por resonancia magnética, la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia seguida de cirugía tardía dio como resultado una mayor reducción del estadio T y de regresión tumoral en comparación con la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo. Pero el estatus histopatológico del margen circunferencial, el margen de resección distal, el rendimiento ganglionar y la morbilidad perioperatoria fueron similares entre los dos grupos. Esto sugiere que la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia podría ser una alternativa viable a la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en cánceres rectales localmente avanzados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

Three perspectives: the approach to neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer according to medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons

Background: Two treatment options considered for radiotherapy are short-course radiotherapy and immediate surgery, or chemoradiation with 5-Fluorouracil based chemotherapy and delayed surgery. Aim of the study: Evaluate the real-life treatment approaches of medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists, to neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancers. Material and methods: An online survey was established via Google Forms. The survey was taken voluntarily by medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgical oncologists, and general surgeons. Results: Of those who participated, 183 were medical oncologists, 36 were radiotherapists, and 36 were surgeons. Most of the study population preferred long-course radiation therapy and chemotherapy (85%). Meanwhile, two-thirds of the participants preferred chemotherapy prior to operating. The most frequent chemotherapy cycles for the pre-operative setting were ‘three’ and ‘four-or-more’ (27.8% and 25.1%, respectively). Medical oncologists had a significantly higher tendency to offer chemotherapy between radiation therapy and surgery compared to the other groups. Optimal time of surgery was different between groups, but there was no difference among groups between surgery and the ‘watch & wait’ strategy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were significantly different between groups. Conclusions: We found that the new pre-operative chemotherapy regimen with short-course radiotherapy was slowly adopted into current practice. Also, medical oncologists tended to prefer pre-operative chemotherapy in comparison to the other groups.

High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost After Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background: The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation has enhanced local control in rectal cancer patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adding a high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) boost in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective trial was conducted based on the medical records of patients with rectal cancer, who were referred to a tertiary hospital for neoadjuvant treatment. Fifteen patients who were treated with HDR brachytherapy boost after completion of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy were enrolled in the intervention group and 15 patients who were clinically matched (age, sex, stage, and distance of tumor from anal verge) were selected as the control group. EBRT schedule and concurrent chemotherapy regimen were similar in the two groups. The rate of pathological complete response (PCR), downstaging (T staging), and frequency of side effects were compared between the two groups of the study. Results: The mean age of patients was 57.97 ± 9.11 years and 18 patients (60%) were male. The results showed that T 3 and N 1 rectal cancer had the highest frequency among patients. Downstaging was observed in 66.7% and 80% of the control and intervention groups, respectively (P: 0.40). The rate of PCR was not different in the two groups (13.3% in both groups, P > 0.99). There were no significant differences in terms of treatment complications between the two groups, as well. Conclusions: HDR-BRT boost for rectal cancer is feasible and might improve downstaging in rectal cancer, but not PCR.

BRIDGE -1 TRIAL: BReak Interval Delayed surgery for Gastrointestinal Extraperitoneal rectal cancer, a multicentric phase III randomized trial

Design

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).Several studies have shown a correlation between a longer interval between the end of nCRT and surgery (surgical interval - SI) and an increased pathological complete response (pCR) rate, with a maximum obtained between 10 and 13 weeks.The primary endpoint of this multicenter, 2-arm randomised trial is to investigate SI lengthening, evaluating the difference in terms of complete response (CR) and Tumor Regression Grade (TRG)1 rate in the two arms. Secondly, the impact of SI lengthening on survival outcomes and quality of life (QoL) will be investigated.

Methods

Intermediate-risk LARC patients undergoing nCRT will be prospectively included in the study. nCRT will be administered with a total dose of 55 Gy in 25 fractions on Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) plus the corresponding mesorectum of 45 Gy in 25 fractions on the whole pelvis. Chemotherapy with oral capecitabine will be administered continuously.The patients achieving a clinical major or complete response assessed at clinical-instrumental re-evaluation at 7-8 weeks after treatment completion, will be randomized into two groups, to undergo surgery or local excision at 9-11 weeks (control arm) or at 13-16 weeks (experimental arm). Pathological response will be assessed on the surgical specimen using the AJCC TNM v.7 and the TRG according to Mandard. Patients will be followed up to evaluate toxicity and QoL.The promoter center of the trial will conduct the randomization process through an automated procedure to prevent any possible bias.For sample size calculation, using CR difference of 20% as endpoint, 74 patients per arm will be enrolled.

Conclusions

The results of this study may prospectively provide a new time frame for the clinical re-evaluation for complete/major responders patients in order to increase the CR rate to nCRT.Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03581344.

Right colon, left colon, and rectal cancer have different oncologic and quality of life outcomes

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer patients are commonly considered a single entity in outcomes studies. This is particularly true for quality of life (QOL) studies. This study aims to compare oncologic and QOL outcomes between right colon, left colon, and rectal cancer in patients operated on in a single high-volume institution.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients with pathological stages I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma electively operated on with curative intent between 2000 and 2010. Patient characteristics, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and QOL were compared according to cancer location.

RESULTS

Two-thousand sixty-five (606 right colon cancer [RCC], 366 left colon cancer [LCC], and 1093 rectal cancer [RC]) patients met the inclusion criteria. LCC had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the non-adjusted analysis (p < 0.001) and better OS in multivariate analysis adjusted by age, gender, ASA, chemotherapy, and pathological stage (p = 0.024). Although RCC had worse OS and DFS in non-adjusted survival analysis than LCC and RC, when adjusted for the factors above, RCC had better survival outcomes than RC, but not LCC. COX regression analysis showed age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.016), ASA (p < 0.001), pathological stage (p < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.043), and cancer location (p = 0.024) were independently associated with OS. Age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.030), ASA (p = 0.004), and pathological stage (p < 0.001) were independently associated with DFS. Patients with RC reported more sexual dysfunction and work restrictions than colon cancers (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In an adjusted multivariate analysis, colon cancers demonstrated better survival outcomes when compared to rectal cancers.

The effect of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer: A single referral center experience

Background

COVID-19 has significantly impacted healthcare worldwide. Lack of screening and limited access to healthcare has delayed diagnosis and treatment of various malignancies. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing surgery for newly diagnosed rectal cancer. Patients operated on during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020–February 2021) comprised the study group (COVID-19 era), while patients operated on prior to the pandemic (March 2016–February 2020) served as the control group (pre–COVID-19).

Results

This study included 234 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer; 180 (77%) patients in the pre–COVID-19 group and 54 patients (23%) in the COVID-19–era group. There were no differences between the groups in terms of mean patient age, sex, or body mass index. The COVID-19–era group presented with a significantly higher rate of locally advanced disease (stage T3/T4 79% vs 58%; P = .02) and metastatic disease (9% vs 3%; P = .05). The COVID-19–era group also had a much higher percentage of patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (52% vs 15%; P = .001) and showed a significantly lower rate of sphincter-preserving surgery (73% vs 86%; P = .028). Time from diagnosis to surgery in this group was also significantly longer (median 272 vs 146 days; P < .0001).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic presented later and at a more advanced stage. They were more likely to be treated with total neoadjuvant therapy and were less likely candidates for sphincter-preserving surgery.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Impacts the Prognostic Effect of Surgical Margin Status in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Many studies show significantly improved survival after R0 resection compared with R1 resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC); however, the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) on this association is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive surgical margins (SMs) after NACRT compared with upfront surgery + adjuvant therapy in PAC.

METHODS

All cases of surgically resected PAC at a single institution were reviewed from 1996 to 2014; patients treated with palliative intent, metastatic disease, and biliary/ampullary tumors were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 300 patients were included; 134 patients received NACRT with concurrent 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine followed by surgery, and 166 patients received upfront surgery (+ adjuvant chemotherapy in 72% of patients and RT in 65%); 31% of both groups had a positive SM (+SM). The median OS for patients with a +SM or negative SM (-SM) was 26.6 and 31.6 months, respectively for NACRT, and 12.0 and 24.5 months, respectively, for upfront surgery. OS was significantly improved with -SM compared with +SM in both groups (p = 0.006). When resection yielded +SM, NACRT patients had improved OS compared with upfront surgery patients (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, +SM in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-4.24; p < 0.001) and older age (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, per year; p = 0.007) predicted worse OS. +SM in the NACRT group was not associated with worse OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.72-1.65; p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a positive margin after NACRT and surgery had longer survival compared with patients with a positive margin after upfront surgery. NACRT should be strongly considered for patients at high risk of R1 resections.

Circulating miRNA Signature Predicts Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are recommended to receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) followed by surgery. Response to PCRT varies widely: 60%-70% of patients with LARC do not derive therapeutic benefit from PCRT, whereas 15%-20% of patients achieve pathologic complete response (pCR). We sought to develop a liquid biopsy assay for identifying response to PCRT in patients with LARC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed two genome-wide microRNA (miRNA) expression profiling data sets from tumor tissue samples for in silico discovery (GSE68204) and validation (GSE29298). We prioritized biomarkers in pretreatment plasma specimens from clinical training (n = 41; 15 responders and 26 nonresponders) and validation (n = 65; 29 responders and 36 nonresponders) cohorts of patients with LARC. We developed an integrated miRNA panel and established a risk assessment model, which was combined with the miRNA panel and carcinoembryonic antigen levels.

RESULTS

Our comprehensive discovery effort identified an 8-miRNA panel that robustly predicted response to PCRT, with an excellent accuracy in the discovery (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.95) and validation (AUC = 0.92) cohorts. We successfully established a circulating miRNA panel with remarkable diagnostic accuracy in the clinical training (AUC = 0.82) and validation (AUC = 0.81) cohorts. Moreover, the predictive accuracy of the panel was significantly superior to conventional clinical factors in both cohorts (P < .01) and the risk assessment model was superior (AUC = 0.83). Finally, we applied our model to detect patients with pathologic complete response and showed that it was dramatically superior to currently used pathologic features (AUC = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Our novel risk assessment signature for predicting response to PCRT has a potential for clinical translation as a liquid biopsy assay in patients with LARC.

Association of Delayed Surgery With Oncologic Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Not Responding to Preoperative Chemoradiation

IMPORTANCE

Extending the interval between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery may enhance tumor response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, data on the association of delaying surgery with long-term outcome in patients who had a minor or poor response are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess a large series of patients who had minor or no tumor response to CRT and the association of shorter or longer waiting times between CRT and surgery with short- and long-term outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data from 1701 consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated in 12 Italian referral centers were analyzed for colorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2014. Patients with a minor or null tumor response (ypT stage of 2 to 3 or ypN positive) stage greater than 0 to neoadjuvant CRT were selected for the study. The data were analyzed between March and July 2020.

EXPOSURES

Patients who had a minor or null tumor response were divided into 2 groups according to the wait time between neoadjuvant therapy end and surgery. Differences in surgical and oncological outcomes between these 2 groups were explored.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1064 patients, 654 (61.5%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 64 (55-71) years. A total of 579 patients (54.4%) had a shorter wait time (8 weeks or less) 485 patients (45.6%) had a longer wait time (greater than 8 weeks). A longer waiting time before surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (67.6% [95% CI, 63.1%-71.7%] vs 80.3% [95% CI, 76.5%-83.6%] at 5 years; 40.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-46.5%] vs 57.8% [95% CI, 52.1%-63.0%] at 10 years; P < .001). Also, delayed surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (59.6% [95% CI, 54.9%-63.9%] vs 72.0% [95% CI, 67.9%-75.7%] at 5 years; 36.2% [95% CI, 29.9%-42.4%] vs 53.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-59.1%] at 10 years; P < .001). At multivariate analysis, a longer waiting time was associated with an augmented risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.50-2.26; P < .001) and death/recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.04; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, a longer interval before surgery after completing neoadjuvant CRT was associated with worse overall and disease-free survival in tumors with a poor pathological response to preoperative CRT. Based on these findings, patients who do not respond well to CRT should be identified early after the end of CRT and undergo surgery without delay.

Effect of delaying surgery by more than 10 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a single institution experience

The optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer is still controversial. Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing time interval between the end of CRT and surgery on pathological outcomes. This is a retrospective analysis on 114 patients treated with long-course neoadjuvant RT with or without chemotherapy between January 2005 and September 2020. 43 patients underwent surgery within 10 weeks from the end of CRT (1st group), whereas 71 patients underwent total mesorectal excision with a time interval equal or greater than 10 weeks (2nd group). Primary endpoint was pCR (pathological complete response). Secondary endpoints were near pCR (ypT0-1 N0), tumor downstaging (ypT less than cT), nodal downstaging (ypN less than cN), and overall response comparing clinical with pathological TN stage. Overall, the pCR rate was 8.8%, whereas we observed no significantly difference in primary endpoint between the two groups. Considering near pCR, a trend toward significant difference in favor of 2nd group was seen (p = 0.072). Tumor and nodal downstaging rates were 39.5%, 41.9%, 59.2%, and 56.3% in the 1st and 2nd group, respectively, with a statistically significant difference for T category (p = 0.042). Overall response rates (TN stage) showed a trend toward significant difference in favor of patients of the ≥ 10 week group (p = 0.059). Our study suggests that a prolonged time interval between the end of CRT and surgery (≥ 10 weeks) increases pathological response rates.

The efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy doses in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and adverse effects of different radiotherapy (RT) doses in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in hospital between January 2015 and May 2017 were enrolled in retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into the 56-Gy group and the 50-Gy group. The concurrent chemotherapy regimen was based on capecitabine. All patients received one cycle of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine induction chemotherapy. All patients completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and received radical surgery.

Results

Of the patients in this study, 29 patients and 30 patients received a radiation dose of 56- and 50-Gy, respectively. All clinical characteristics were matched between the two groups. All patients received surgery 6 to 8 weeks after completing RT. The therapeutical effective rate in the 56-Gy group was 93.10% (27/29), compared with 66.67% in the 50-Gy group (20/30); the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ²=6.36, P=0.01). The pathological complete remission (pCR) rate in the 56-Gy group (37.93%, 11/29) was statistically significantly higher than that in the 50-Gy group (13.33%, 4/30) (χ²=4.71, P=0.030). The anal preservation rate in the 56-Gy group (65.5%, 19/29) was statistically significantly higher than that in the 50-Gy group (33.33%, 10/30) (χ²=6.11, P=0.01). The 56-Gy group had a local recurrence rate of 0% (0/29) and a distant metastasis rate of 10.34% (3/29), while the 50-Gy group had a local recurrence rate of 6.67% (2/30) and a distant metastasis rate of 16.67% (5/30); no significant difference existed between the two groups (χ²=2.00, 0.50, P=0.16, 0.48). The incidence of adverse reactions (gastrointestinal reactions, bone marrow suppression, and perianal skin reactions) in the 56-Gy group was not significantly different from that in the 50-Gy group (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Increasing the radiation dose can significantly improve the anal preservation and pCR rates of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, thus improving their life quality. Moreover, it does not increase the rates of recurrence or adverse reactions. Our findings have certain clinical significance, but further prospective study is needed.

Temporal determinants of tumour response to neoadjuvant rectal radiotherapy

Introduction

In locally advanced rectal cancer, longer delay to surgery after neoadjuvant radiotherapy increases the likelihood of histopathological tumour response. Chronomodulated radiotherapy in rectal cancer has recently been reported as a factor increasing tumour response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients having earlier surgery, with patients receiving a larger proportion of afternoon treatments showing improved response. This paper aims to replicate this work by exploring the impact of these two temporal factors, independently and in combination, on histopathological tumour response in rectal cancer patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who received long course (≥24 fractions) neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy at a tertiary referral centre was conducted. Delay to surgery and radiotherapy treatment time were correlated to clinicopathologic characteristics with a particular focus on tumour regression grade. A review of the literature and meta-analysis were also conducted to ascertain the impact of time to surgery from preoperative radiotherapy on tumour regression.

Results

From a cohort of 367 patients, 197 patients met the inclusion criteria. Complete pathologic response (AJCC regression grade 0) was seen in 46 (23%) patients with a further 44 patients (22%) having at most small groups of residual cells (AJCC regression grade 1). Median time to surgery was 63 days, and no statistically significant difference was seen in tumour regression between patients having early or late surgery. There was a non-significant trend towards a larger proportion of morning treatments in patients with grade 0 or 1 regression (p = 0.077). There was no difference in tumour regression when composite groups of the two temporal variables were analysed. Visualisation of data from 39 reviewed papers (describing 27379 patients) demonstrated a plateau of response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy after approximately 60 days, and a meta-analysis found improved complete pathologic response in patients having later surgery.

Conclusions

There was no observed benefit of chronomodulated radiotherapy in our cohort of rectal cancer patients. Review of the literature and meta-analysis confirms the benefit of delayed surgery, with a plateau in complete response rates at approximately 60-days between completion of radiotherapy and surgery. In our cohort, time to surgery for the majority of our patients lay along this plateau and this may be a more dominant factor in determining response to neoadjuvant therapy, obscuring any effects of chronomodulation on tumour response. We would recommend surgery be performed between 8 and 11 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Omission of or Poor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Impacts Radial Margin Positivity Rates in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

In the setting of multidisciplinary standardized care of locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision have become the mainstay treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether the lack of preoperative chemoradiotherapy or poor response to it is associated with higher radial margin disease involvement in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study using a publicly available database.

SETTING

Data were collected from the proctectomy-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Project file from 2016 to 2017.

PATIENTS

A total of 1161 patients were analyzed. They were categorized into 3 groups: patients who did not receive any preoperative chemoradiotherapy (28.6%), patients who received and responded to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (41.2%), and patients who received but did not respond to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (30.2%).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Response to treatment was determined by using the American Joint Committee on Cancer pretreatment and final pathological staging. Circumferential radial margin was extracted from the targeted proctectomy file.

RESULTS

Disease-involved positive circumferential radial margin was found in 86 (7.4%) cases. Positive radial margin was noted in 11 of 479 patients (2.3%) who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and responded to treatment, 30 of 350 patients (8.6%) who did not respond or had a poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and 45 of 332 patients (13.6%) who did not receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.001). Regression analysis demonstrated that patients who do not receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy or have poor response to it have 6.6 and 4 times higher chances of having a positive radial margin.

LIMITATIONS

There is a risk of selection bias, unidentified confounders, and missing data despite the use of a nationwide cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Omission of indicated preoperative chemoradiotherapy or poor response to it is associated with increased risk of radial margin positivity. More efforts are needed for standardized rectal cancer care with the appropriate use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B467.

LA OMISIN O LA ESCASA RESPUESTA A QUIMIORADIOTERAPIA PREOPERATORIA, AFECTA LAS TASAS DE POSITIVIDAD DEL MARGEN RADIAL, EN EL CNCER RECTAL LOCALMENTE AVANZADO

ANTECEDENTES:En el contexto de la atención multidisciplinaria estandarizada del cáncer rectal localmente avanzado, la quimioradioterapia preoperatoria y la escisión mesorrectal total, se han convertido en el tratamiento principal.OBJETIVO:Evaluar si la omisión de quimioradioterapia preoperatoria o la escasa respuesta, se asocia con mayor enfermedad del margen radial, en pacientes con cáncer rectal localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando una base de datos disponible públicamente.AJUSTE:Se recopilaron datos del archivo del Proyecto Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica dirigido a la proctectomía de 2016-2017.PACIENTES:Se analizaron un total de 1161 pacientes. Clasificados en tres grupos: pacientes que no recibieron quimioradioterapia preoperatoria (28,6%), pacientes que recibieron y respondieron a quimioradioterapia preoperatoria (41,2%) y pacientes que recibieron pero no respondieron a la quimioradioterapia preoperatoria (30,2%).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La respuesta al tratamiento se determinó utilizando el pre tratamiento y la estatificación patológica final, del American Joint Committee on Cancer. El margen radial circunferencial se extrajo del archivo de proctectomía dirigida.RESULTADOS:Se encontró enfermedad que abarcaba el margen radial circunferencial +, en el 86 (7,4%) casos. Se observó el margen radial +, en 11 de 479 pacientes (2,3%) que se sometieron a quimioradioterapia preoperatoria y respondieron al tratamiento, 30 de 350 pacientes (8,6%) que no respondieron o tuvieron una mala respuesta con quimioradioterapia preoperatoria y en 45 de 332 pacientes (13,6%) que no recibieron quimioradioterapia preoperatoria (p <0,001). El análisis de regresión demostró que los pacientes que no reciben quimioradioterapia preoperatoria o que tienen escasa respuesta, presentan respectivamente, 6,6 y 4 veces más probabilidades de tener un margen radial +.LIMITACIONES:Existe el riesgo de sesgo de selección, factores de confusión no identificados y datos faltantes a pesar del uso de una cohorte nacional.CONCLUSIONES:La omisión de la quimioradioterapia preoperatoria indicada o la escasa respuesta, se asocian a un mayor riesgo de positividad del margen radial. Se necesitan mayores esfuerzos en la atención estandarizada del cáncer rectal, con el uso adecuado de quimioradioterapia preoperatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B467.

Time interval between neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: is the long interval correct for all patients?

BACKGROUND

Optimal time between neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy period and surgery remains controversial in patients with rectal cancer: an increasing number of studies show results in favour of a long interval.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the cases of low-middle rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant RT-CT and surgery: the primary endpoint was the complete pathological response rate and the secondary endpoint the rate of complications. We analysed cases from 1/01/2003 to 31/12/2018 divided in two periods: from 2003 to 2010 (23 pts) and from 2011 to 2018 (23 pts). The two periods were characterised by two different surgical teams which use different time intervals (≤vs>8 weeks).

RESULTS

The pCR rate is 21.7% in both groups; as regards the complications, the difference between the two groups is in grade IIIb: 8.7% in the first group and 17.4% in the second group (p 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Although our study is based on a small number of patients, it shows the same rate of pCR with respect to two different time intervals; this suggests the need for studies based on the division of patients into subgroups and the evaluation of different time intervals in order to reach the best oncological outcomes.

Predictive Factors for Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Background:

An accurate assessment of potential pathologic complete response(pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(NCRT) is important for the appropriate treatment of rectal cancer. However, the factors that predict the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have not been well defined. Therefore, this study analyzed the predictive factors on the development of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

Methods:

From January 2008 to January 2018, a total of 432 consecutive patients from a single institution patients who underwent a long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were reviewed in this study. The clinicopathological features were analyzed to identify predictive factors for pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Results:

The rate of pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation was 20.8%, patients were divided into the pCR and non-pCR groups. The two groups were well balanced in terms of age, gender, body mass index, ASA score, tumor stage, tumor differentiation, tumor location, surgical procedure, chemotherapy regimen and radiation dose. The multivariate analysis revealed that a pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of ≤5 ng/mL and an interval of ≥8 weeks between the completion of chemoradiation and surgical resection were independent risk factors of an increased rate of pCR.

Conclusions:

Pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of ≤5 ng/mL and an interval of ≥8 weeks between the completion of chemoradiation and surgical resection are predictive factors for pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Using these predictive factors, we can predict the prognosis of patients and develop adaptive treatment strategies. A wait-and-see policy might be possible in highly selective cases.

Evolution and Current Status of the Multidisciplinary Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has grown in both complexity and quality since the first proctectomy. What once was a malignancy with a fairly consistent treatment algorithm for decades, a recent paradigm shift in the care of these patients has led to a more personalized, multidisciplinary approach with variations in timing, sequence, duration, and potential exclusion of multimodality therapies. This review summarizes the most important evidence behind these developing overarching concepts to provide a context for this paradigm shift.

Predicting pathological response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review

Introduction: Pathological complete response (pCR) rates of approximately 20% following neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer have given rise to non-operative or watch-and-wait (W&W) management. To improve outcomes there has been significant research into predictors of response. The goal is to optimize selection for W&W, avoid chemoradiotherapy in those who won't benefit and improve treatment to maximize the clinical complete response (cCR) rate and the number of patients who can be considered for W&W.Areas covered: A systematic review of articles published 2008-2018 and indexed in PubMed, Embase or Medline was performed to identify predictors of pathological response (including pCR and recognized tumor regression grades) to fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy in patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Evidence for clinical, biomarker and radiological predictors is discussed as well as potential future directions.Expert opinion: Our current ability to predict the response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is very limited. cCR of 40% has been achieved with total neoadjuvant therapy. If neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer continues to improve it is possible that the treatment for rectal cancer may eventually parallel that of anal squamous cell carcinoma, with surgery reserved for the minority of patients who don't respond to chemoradiotherapy.