A Broad Assessment of Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery

Preoperative esophageal testing predicts postoperative reflux status in sleeve gastrectomy patients

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) are at risk of postoperative GERD. The reasons are multifactorial, but half of conversions to Roux-en Y gastric bypass are for intractable GERD. Our institution routinely performs preoperative pH and high-resolution manometry studies to aid in operative decision making. We hypothesize that abnormal pH studies in concert with ineffective esophageal motility would lead to higher rates of postoperative reflux after VSG.

METHODS

A single institution retrospective review was conducted of adult patients who underwent preoperative pH and manometry testing and VSG between 2015 and 2021. Patients filled out a symptom questionnaire at the time of testing. Postoperative reflux was defined by patient-reported symptoms at 1-year follow-up. Univariate logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between esophageal tests and postoperative reflux. The Lui method was used to determine the cutpoint for pH and manometric variables maximizing sensitivity and specificity for postoperative reflux.

RESULTS

Of 291 patients who underwent VSG, 66 (22.7%) had a named motility disorder and 67 (23%) had an abnormal DeMeester score. Preoperatively, reflux was reported by 122 patients (41.9%), of those, 69 (56.6%) had resolution. Preoperative pH and manometric abnormalities, and BMI reduction did not predict postoperative reflux status (p = ns). In a subgroup analysis of patients with an abnormal preoperative pH study, the Lui cutpoint to predict postoperative reflux was a DeMeester greater than 24.8. Postoperative reflux symptoms rates above and below this point were 41.9% versus 17.1%, respectively (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

While manometry abnormalities did not predict postoperative reflux symptoms, GERD burden did. Patients with a mildly elevated DeMeester score had a low risk of postoperative reflux compared to patients with a more abnormal DeMeester score. A preoperative pH study may help guide operative decision-making and lead to better counseling of patients of their risk for reflux after VSG.

Salvage Options for Fundoplication Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects millions of people worldwide. Many patients with medically refractory symptoms ultimately undergo antireflux surgery, most often with a laparoscopic fundoplication. Symptoms related to GERD may persist or recur. Revisional surgery is necessary in some patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

A reoperative fundoplication is the most commonly performed salvage procedure for failed fundoplication. Although redo fundoplication has been reported to have increased risk of morbidity compared with primary cases, increasing experience with the minimally invasive approach to reoperative surgery has significantly improved patient outcome with acceptable resolution of reflux symptoms in the majority of patients. Recurrence of reflux symptoms after an initial fundoplication requires a thorough work-up and a thoughtful approach. While reoperative fundoplication is the most common procedure performed, there are other options and the treatment should be tailored to the patient, their history, and the mechanism of fundoplication failure.

De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy: role of preoperative silent reflux

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric procedure to date. However, LSG is known to worsen pre-operative and result in de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Pre-operative evaluation reveals a high percentage of silent GERD of so far unknown influence on post-operative GERD.

METHODS

Prospective data of patients undergoing primary LSG between 01/2012 and 12/2015 were evaluated. Pre-operative GERD-specific evaluation consisted of validated questionnaires, upper endoscopy, 24 h-pH-manometry, and esophagograms. Patients were followed-up with questionnaires every 6 months, upper endoscopies after 1 year and 24 h-pH-metry after 2 years. Silent GERD was defined as esophagitis grade > B and/or abnormal esophageal acid exposure in absence of symptoms. LSG was performed over a 32F bougie, hiatal hernias > 1 cm were addressed with posterior hiatoplasty. Excluded were patients with hiatal hernias > 4 cm, patients with incorrect anatomy (stenosis, fundus too large) and conversion to RYGB for early leaks.

RESULTS

222 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 32 ± 16 months, mean preoperative body mass index 49.6 ± 7.2 kg/m². 116 patients (52%) presented with post-operative GERD-symptoms, of which 85 (73%) had de novo symptoms. Of those, 48 (of 85, 56%) had no preoperative GERD and 37 (of 85, 44%) silent GERD. 57 patients (26%) had neither pre- nor post-operative GERD, 7 (3%) had silent pre-operative and no postop GERD, and in 19 patients (9%) GERD was cured with LSG. 31 patients (14%) stayed symptomatic. Of 56 patients (25%) with pre-operative silent GERD, 37 (of 54, 66%) became symptomatic.

CONCLUSION

LSG leads to a considerable rate of post-operative GERD. De novo-GERD consist of around half of pre-operative silent GERD and completely de novo-GERD. Most patients with pre-operative silent GERD became symptomatic.

Radiologic, endoscopic, and functional patterns in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard in treatment of morbid obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Resolution of GERD symptoms is reported to be approximately 85% to 90%.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patients with persistent GERD symptoms after RYGB and to identify contributing factors.

SETTING

University hospital, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Data of patients evaluated for persistent GERD with a history of RYGB between January 2012 and December 2015 were reviewed. GERD was assessed with questionnaires, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-impendance manometry, and barium swallow.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients, 44 (93.6%) presented with typical GERD, 18 (38.3%) with obstruction, 8 (17%) with pulmonary symptoms, and 21 (44.7%) with pain. The interval between RYGB and evaluation was a median of 3.8 years (range .8-12.6); median patient age was 36.5 years (19.1-67.2). Median body mass index was 30.3 kg/m² (20.3-47.2). Pouch gastric fistulas were seen in 2 (5.1%), enlarged pouches in 5 (10.6%), and hiatal hernias in 25 patients (53.2%). Twelve (23.4%) had esophagitis>Los Angeles (LA) grade B. Manometry was performed in 45 (95.7%) and off-proton pump inhibitor 24-hour pH-impedance-metry in 44 patients (94.6%). Seventeen patients (37.8%) had esophageal hypomotility or aperistalsis; hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter was seen in 26 patients (57.8%). Increased esophageal acid exposure (>4% pH<4) was found in 27 (61.4%), an increased number of reflux episodes (>53) in 30 patients (68.2%). Symptoms were deemed as functional in 6 (12.8%).

CONCLUSION

The evaluation for persistent GERD after RYGB revealed a high percentage of hiatal hernias, hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter, and severe esophageal motility disorders. These findings might have an influence on hiatal hernia closure concomitant with RYGB and the role of pH manometry in the preoperative bariatric assessment.

Evaluation and management of patients with symptoms after anti-reflux surgery

Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in the number of anti-reflux operations being performed. This is mostly due to the use of laparoscopic techniques, the increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the population, and the increasing unwillingness of patients to take acid suppressive medications for life. Laparoscopic fundoplication is now widely available in both academic and community hospitals, has a limited length of stay and postoperative recovery time, and is associated with excellent outcomes in carefully selected patients. Although the operation has low mortality and postoperative morbidity, it is associated with late postoperative complications, such as gas bloat syndrome, dysphagia, diarrhea, and recurrent GERD symptoms. This review summarizes the diagnostic evaluation and appropriate management of such postoperative complications. If a reoperation is needed, it should be performed by experienced foregut surgeons.

A comparative trial of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with the LINX device is a promising new therapy for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Initial studies have demonstrated MSA to be safe and effective. However, no direct comparison between MSA and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF), the gold standard surgical therapy for GERD, has been performed.

METHODS

A single institution, case-control study was conducted of MSA performed from 2012 to 2013 and a cohort of LNF matched for age, gender, and hiatal hernia size.

RESULTS

MSA and LNF were both effective treatments for reflux with 75 and 83 % of patients, respectively, reporting resolution of GERD at short-term follow-up. Dysphagia was common following both MSA and LNF, but severe dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilation was more frequent after MSA (50 vs. 0 %, p = 0.01). Need for dilation did not correlate with size of the LINX device or any other examined patient factors. A trend toward decreased adverse GI symptoms of bloating, flatulence, and diarrhea was seen after MSA compared to LNF (0 vs. 33 %). MSA had a shorter operative time (64 vs. 90 min, p < 0.01) but other peri-operative outcomes, including pain, morbidity, and re-admissions were equivalent to LNF. MSA patients were more likely to be self-referred (58 vs. 0 %, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MSA and LNF are both effective and safe treatments for GERD; however, severe dysphagia requiring endoscopic intervention is more common with MSA. Other adverse GI side effects may be less frequent after MSA. Consideration should be paid to these distinct post-operative symptom profiles when selecting a surgical therapy for reflux disease.

Outcomes reported in high-impact surgical journals

Background

With advances in operative technique and perioperative care, traditional endpoints such as morbidity and mortality provide an incomplete description of surgical outcomes. There is increasing emphasis on the need for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to evaluate fully the effectiveness and quality of surgical interventions. The objective of this study was to identify the outcomes reported in clinical studies published in high-impact surgical journals and the frequency with which PROs are used.

Methods

Electronic versions of material published between 2008 and 2012 in the four highest-impact non-subspecialty surgical journals (Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Surgery (BJS), Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Surgery) were hand-searched. Clinical studies of adult patients undergoing planned abdominal, thoracic or vascular surgery were included. Reported outcomes were classified into five categories using Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model.

Results

A total of 893 articles were assessed, of which 770 were included in the analysis. Some 91·6 per cent of studies reported biological and physiological outcomes, 36·0 per cent symptoms, 13·4 per cent direct indicators of functional status, 10·6 per cent general health perception and 14·8 per cent overall quality of life (QoL). The proportion of studies with at least one PRO was 38·7 per cent overall and 73·4 per cent in BJS (P &lt; 0·001). The proportion of studies using a formal measure of health-related QoL ranged from 8·9 per cent (JAMA Surgery) to 33·8 per cent (BJS).

Conclusion

The predominant reporting of clinical endpoints and the inconsistent use of PROs underscore the need for further research and education to enhance the applicability of these measures in specific surgical settings.

Review on novel concepts of columnar lined esophagus

BACKGROUND

Columnar lined esophagus (CLE) is a marker for gastroesophageal reflux and associates with an increased cancer risk among those with Barrett's esophagus. Recent studies fostered the development of integrated CLE concepts.

METHODS

Using PubMed, we conducted a review of studies on novel histopathological concepts of nondysplastic CLE.

RESULTS

Two histopathological concepts-the squamo-oxyntic gap (SOG) and the dilated distal esophagus (DDE), currently model our novel understanding of CLE. As a consequence of reflux, SOG interposes between the squamous lined esophagus and the oxyntic mucosa of the proximal stomach. Thus the SOG describes the histopathology of CLE within the tubular esophagus and the DDE, which is known to develop at the cost of a shortened lower esophageal sphincter and foster increased acid gastric reflux. Histopathological studies of the lower end of the esophagus indicate, that the DDE is reflux damaged, dilated, gastric type folds forming esophagus and cannot be differentiated from proximal stomach by endoscopy. While the endoscopically visible squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) defines the proximal limit of the SOG, the assessment of the distal limit requires the histopathology of measured multilevel biopsies. Within the SOG, CLE types distribute along a distinct zonation with intestinal metaplasia (IM; Barrett's esophagus) and/or cardiac mucosa (CM) at the SCJ and oxyntocardiac mucosa (OCM) within the distal portion of the SOG. The zonation follows the pH-gradient across the distal esophagus. Diagnosis of SOG and DDE includes endoscopy, histopathology of measured multi-level biopsies from the distal esophagus, function, and radiologic tests. CM and OCM do not require treatment and are surveilled in 5 year intervals, unless they associate with life quality impairing symptoms, which demand medical or surgical therapy. In the presence of an increased cancer risk profile, it is justified to consider radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of IM within clinical studies in order to prevent the progression to dysplasia and cancer. Dysplasia justifies RFA ± endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

SOG and DDE represent novel concepts fusing the morphological and functional aspects of CLE. Future studies should examine the impact of SOG and DDE for monitoring and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate our clinical experience during a 6-year period with an implantable device that augments the lower esophageal sphincter for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The device uses magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) to strengthen the antireflux barrier.

STUDY DESIGN

In a single-center, prospective case series, 100 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic MSA for GERD between March 2007 and February 2012. Clinical outcomes for each patient were tracked post implantation and compared with presurgical data for esophageal pH measurements, symptom scores, and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use.

RESULTS

Median implant duration was 3 years (range 378 days to 6 years). Median total acid exposure time was reduced from 8.0% before implant to 3.2% post implant (p < 0.001). The median GERD Health Related Quality of Life score at baseline was 16 on PPIs and 24 off PPIs and improved to a score of 2 (p < 0.001). Freedom from daily dependence on PPIs was achieved in 85% of patients. There have been no long-term complications, such as device migrations or erosions. Three patients had the device laparoscopically removed for persistent GERD, odynophagia, or dysphagia, with subsequent resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic sphincter augmentation for GERD in clinical practice provides safe and long-term reduction of esophageal acid exposure, substantial symptom improvement, and elimination of daily PPI use. For candidates of antireflux surgery who have been carefully evaluated before surgery to confirm indication for MSA, MSA has become a standard treatment at our institution because control of reflux symptoms and pH normalization can be achieved with minimal side effects and preservation of gastric anatomy.