Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: will the morbidity of an additional surgery be outweighed by better patient outcomes in the long-term? Ann Surg. 2012;256:e10; author reply e16-e17. [PMID: 22868375 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e318265fe4f]

Kupffer cells depletion alters cytokine expression and delays liver regeneration after Radio-frequency-assisted Liver Partition with Portal Vein Ligation

Radio-frequency-assisted Liver Partition with Portal Vein Ligation (RALPP) induces comparable hypertrophy of the liver remnant compared to Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in humans. However, whether it is significantly improved compared to ALPPS is unclear, and the underlying mechanisms of liver regeneration after RALPP need to further investigate. The present study was to develop an animal model mimicking RALPP and explore mechanisms of liver regeneration. The mice in RALPP group received liver radiofrequency ablation and 90% portal vein ligation (PVL), followed by resection of the targeted liver within two days after the first surgery. The mice in ALPPS group underwent 90% PVL combined with parenchyma transection. Controls received liver radiofrequency ablation (RAF group) or PVL (PVL group) or small left lateral lobe (LLL group) resection alone. Liver regeneration was assessed by liver weight and proliferation-associated molecules. The role of Kupffer cells (KCs) in liver regeneration was investigated after RALPP. The results showed that RALPP induced comparable liver regeneration compared to ALPPS, but with less liver injury and mortality in mice. RALPP led to over-expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in the circulating plasma compared with PVL. KCs infiltrating in liver tissues was a characteristic of mice in the RALPP group. KCs depletion markedly depressed cytokine expression and delayed liver regeneration after RALPP. These results suggested that RALPP in mice induced accelerated liver regeneration similar to ALPPS, but safer than ALPPS. KCs depletion altered cytokine expression and delayed liver regeneration after RALPP.

An updated systematic review of the evolution of ALPPS and evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages in accordance with current evidence

The main obstacle to achieving an R0 resection after a major hepatectomy is inability to preserve an adequate future liver remnant (FLR) to avoid postoperative liver failure (PLF). Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a novel technique for resecting tumors that were previously considered unresectable, and this technique results in a vast increase in the volume of the FLR in a short period of time. However, this technique continues to provoke heated debate because of its high mortality and morbidity.The evolution of ALPPS and its advantages and disadvantages have been systematically reviewed and evaluated in accordance with current evidence. Electronic databases (PubMed and Medline) were searched for potentially relevant articles from January 2007 to January 2016.ALPPS has evolved into various modified forms. Some of these modified techniques have reduced the difficulty of the procedure and enhanced its safety. Current evidence indicates that the advantages of ALPPS are rapid hypertrophy of the FLR, the feasibility of the procedure, and a higher rate of R0 resection in comparison to other techniques. However, ALPPS is associated with worse major complications, more deaths, and early tumor recurrence.Hepatobiliary surgeons should carefully consider whether to perform ALPPS. Some modified forms of ALPPS have reduced the mortality and morbidity of the procedure, but they cannot be recommended over the original procedure currently. Portal vein embolization (PVE) is still the procedure of choice for patients with a tumor-free FLR, and ALPPS could be used as a salvage procedure when PVE fails. More persuasive evidence needs to be assembled to determine whether ALPPS or two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is better for patients with a tumor involving the FLR. Evidence with regard to long-term oncological outcomes is still limited. More meticulous comparative studies and studies of the 5-year survival rate of ALPPS could ultimately help to determine the usefulness of ALPPS. Indications and patient selection for the procedure need to be determined.

Role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastases: A review

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the Western world. Approximately half of patients will develop liver metastases, which is the most common cause of death. The only potentially curative treatment is surgical resection. However, many patients retain a to small future liver remnant (FLR) to allow for resection directly. There are therefore strategies to decrease the tumor with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to increase the FLR. An accepted strategy to increase the FLR is portal vein occlusion (PVO). A concern with this strategy is that a large proportion of patients will never be operated because of progression during the interval between PVO and resection. ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) is a new procedure with a high resection rate. A concern with this approach is the rather high frequency of complications and high mortality, compared to PVO. In this review, it is shown that with ALPPS the resection rate was 97.1% for CRLM and the mortality rate for all diagnoses was 9.6%. The mortality rate was likely lower for patients with CRLM, but some data were lacking in the reports. Due to the novelty of ALPPS, the indications and technique are not yet established but there are arguments for ALPPS in the context of CRLM and a small FLR.

ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Portal vein occlusion to increase the size of the future liver remnant (FLR) is well established, using portal vein ligation (PVL) or embolization (PVE) followed by resection 4-8 weeks later. Associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) combines PVL and complete parenchymal transection, followed by hepatectomy within 1-2 weeks. ALPPS has been recently introduced but remains controversial. We compare the ability of ALPPS versus PVE or PVL for complete tumor resection.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing ALPPS or conventional staged hepatectomies using PVL or PVE at four high-volume HPB centres between 2003 and 2012 was performed. Patients with primary liver tumors and liver metastases were included. Primary endpoint was complete tumor resection. Secondary endpoints include 90-day mortality, complications, FLR increase, time to resection, and tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with ALPPS were compared with 83 patients with conventional-staged hepatectomies. Eighty-three percent (40/48 patients) of ALPPS patients achieved complete resection compared with 66 % (55/83 patients) in PVE/PVL (odds ratio 3.34, p = 0.027). Ninety-day mortality in ALPPS and PVE/PVL was 15 and 6 %, respectively (p = 0.2). Extrapolated growth rate was 11 times higher in ALPPS (34.8 cc/day; interquartile range (IQR) 26-49) compared with PVE/PVL (3 cc/day; IQR2-6; p = 0.001). Tumor recurrence at 1 year was 54 versus 52 % for ALPPS and PVE/PVL, respectively (p = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors at the cost of a high mortality. The technique is promising but should currently not be used outside of studies and registries.

ALPPS: challenging the concept of unresectability--a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic resection for malignancy is limited by the amount of liver parenchyma left behind. As a result, two-staged hepatectomy and portal vein occlusion (PVO) have become part of the treatment algorithm. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been recently described as a method to stimulate rapid and profound hypertrophy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature pertaining to ALPPS was undertaken. Peer-reviewed articles relating to portal vein ligation (PVL) and in situ split (ISS) of the parenchyma were included.

RESULTS

To date, ALPPS has been employed for a variety of primary and metastatic liver tumors. In early case series, the perioperative morbidity and mortality was unacceptably high. However with careful patient selection and improved technique, many centers have reported a 0% 90-day mortality. The benefits of ALPPS include hypertrophy of 61-93% over a median 9-14 days, 95-100% completion of the second stage, and high likelihood of R0 resection (86-100%).

DISCUSSION

ALPPS is only indicated when a two-stage hepatectomy is necessary and the future liver remnant (FLR) is deemed inadequate (<30%). Use in patients with poor functional status, or advanced age (>70 years) is cautioned. Discretion should be used when considering this in patients with pathology other than colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), especially hilar tumors requiring biliary reconstruction. Biliary ligation during the first stage and routine lymphadenectomy of the hepatoduodenal ligament should be avoided.

CONCLUSIONS

A consensus on the indications and contraindications for ALPPS and a standardized operative protocol are needed.