Investigation of the Internal Conditions of 213 Reprocessed Endoscopic Channels

Unseen threats: Lumens 2.0 study reveals the hidden challenges of cleaning lumened surgical instruments

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections can cause significant morbidity requiring lengthy antimicrobial treatment. Infections have been linked to surgical instruments with retained tissue and foreign debris, as the presence of blood or soil interferes with sterilization effectiveness. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of visible soil or debris inside instruments and evaluate the impact of recleaning efforts.

METHODS

Borescopes were used to inspect lumens of instruments used for orthopedic, neurologic, or ear-nose-throat procedures. Whenever visible soil or debris was observed, the instrument was recleaned up to 3 times and reinspected to assess the impact of additional cleaning.

RESULTS

Researchers performed 117 inspections (40 unique instruments, 77 reinspections). All instruments had complex lumens that impede access by brushes. Debris and discoloration or residues were observed inside 100% of instruments, with rusty patches in 95%. Some soil was removed by recleaning, but visible soil remained in most lumens and fragments of lint or brush bristles were visible upon repeat inspection.

CONCLUSIONS

Cleaning in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions was not effective for lumened surgical instruments. Solutions will require collaboration between infection prevention, sterile processing, and manufacturers to evaluate risk and develop strategies for improving processing outcomes.

Validity of the efficacy of the spray flushing cleaning method in flexible endoscope reprocessing

The advancement in endoscopic technology and techniques has increased its use in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. Reprocessing of reusable endoscopes remains a challenge. Inadequate reprocessing leads to bacterial contamination of the endoscope, a significant cause of endoscope-related infections. To thoroughly address the complexities of cleaning a flexible endoscope, various cleaning methods have been devised and tested across different studies. This letter evaluates one such method, spray flushing for flexible gastroscopes, developed and tested in a randomized controlled trial by Du et al. Based on the post-processing test results for this method, Du et al conclude that there is improved cleaning efficacy and reduced damage compared to manual brush cleaning. The validity and reliability of the results could be further enhanced by carefully considering the study design and a few underlying concepts that contribute to the reprocessing quality of different types of endoscopes.

Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Commonly used cleaning brushes in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes often cause damage within the working channels.

AIM

To develop a spray flushing system to achieving effective cleaning of the working channels while minimizing damage.

METHODS

This prospective study included 60 used endoscopes and 60 Teflon tubes randomly divided into a control group (n = 30) and an experimental group (n = 30). The material of Teflon tubes was the same as that of the endoscope working channel. Endoscopes in the control group were manually cleaned using traditional cleaning brushes, while those in the experimental group were cleaned using the newly developed spray flushing system. ATP levels, cleanliness, and microbiological testing of the working channels were measured. Additionally, Teflon tubes in the control group underwent 500 passes with a cleaning brush, while those in the experimental group were subjected to the spray flushing system, and channel damage was evaluated.

RESULTS

The ATP levels (RLU) in the two groups were 32.5 (13-66) and 26 (16-40), respectively (P > 0.05). Cleanliness scores were 1.5 (1-2) and 1 (1-2), respectively (P > 0.05). Debris was found in 73.3% of the control group, which was significantly higher than 46.7% in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Microbiological tests for both groups yielded negative results. Teflon tube damage in the control group was rated at 4 (4-5.25), which was significantly higher than in the experimental group 4 (3-4) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The spray flushing system demonstrated superior efficacy in removing debris and resulted in less damage to the endoscope working channels compared with traditional cleaning brushes.

Beyond Endoscopes: Pilot Study of Surgical Instrument Lumen Inspection

Objective: Borescope examinations of endoscope channels are commonly described in literature, but no studies on surgical instrument lumen inspection have been published recently. Inadequately processed surgical instruments have been implicated in patient infections. This study assessed the utility of borescopes for inspecting surgical instruments. Methods: The study team inspected and photographed sterilized, patient-ready arthroscopic shaver handpieces and suction tips using a tablet camera and borescopes to characterize internal anatomy, defects found in lumens, and the impact of recleaning on debris or residues. Results: Ten suctions and eight shavers were inspected. All suctions had internal ridges and suction holes that were perpendicular to the lumen. All shavers had visible ridges, elbows, and lever mechanisms inside lumens. Of the 18 instruments, 16 (88%) had internal features that appeared rough or jagged and 17 (94%) had visible debris or discoloration in the lumens. Recleaning efforts generally were effective for suctions, but multiple rounds of recleaning with enhanced steps were less effective for shavers, which were replaced. Researchers documented retained soil and brush bristles in several new shavers despite following manufacturer instructions for cleaning and found visible damage and discoloration within five uses. Discussion: This study demonstrated the value of borescope examinations for surgical instrument lumens. Visual inspections identified anatomical features that could influence cleaning effectiveness and detected residual soil, discoloration, and debris in most instruments. The findings suggested that manufacturer cleaning instructions were insufficient and additional cleaning was not always effective. In response, the site's multidisciplinary team strengthened risk assessment protocols and enhanced their cleaning practices.