Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair as a Day Surgery Procedure: Audit of 127 Consecutive Cases in a University Hospital

Patient selection criteria for an effective laparoscopic intraperitoneal ventral hernia repair in day surgery

The laparoscopic treatment of abdominal wall defects is currently a valid alternative to the open technique, given the possibility to significantly reduce the length of hospital stay and, consequently, to allow its carrying out in a day surgery setting. The comparison between the two methods has also been the subject of a Cochrane meta-analysis performed by Sauerland et al. (Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD007781, 2011), which pointed out how, in spite of many clinical trials indicating the superiority of laparoscopy in terms of invasiveness and postoperative pain control, the quality of evidence is low due to the excessive variability among the different series in terms of reported complications. Moreover, what should be the selection criteria of patients fit for laparoscopic treatment in day surgery is not yet defined. This retrospective study considered 94 patients with primary or recurrent incisional wall hernias treated with laparoscopic technique over a 7-year period of time, from 2011 to 2018. The aim was to define the selection criteria for an effective day surgery laparoscopic treatment, considering as outcome the rate of conversion to ordinary hospitalization (discharge > POD1). Discharge > POD 1 was necessary in 15 cases out of 94 (16%). Concerning this outcome, statistically significant risk factors were ASA score > I (p = 0.022), number of hernia orifices > 1 (p = 0.001), recurrent hernias (p = 0.002) and hernia diameter > 10 cm (p < 0.0001). These factors were confirmed by univariate binary logistic analysis. A stepwise model of multivariate analysis showed as determinants for adverse events ASA score > 1 (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.1-25.6, p = 0.043) and hernias > 10 cm (OR 7.0, 95% CI 1.1-46.4, p = 0.045). This work highlighted some useful criteria for preoperative selection of patients fit for laparoscopic abdominal wall defects repair in a day surgery setting. In particular, criteria related to a favorable clinical outcome were ASA score < II and a hernia diameter < 10 cm.

Factors of selection and failure of ambulatory incisional hernia repair: A cohort study of 1429 patients

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory surgery for incisional hernia repair (IHR) is not a widespread practice and is mainly performed for small incisional hernias.

AIM

To assess outpatient IHR practice in France and to identify predictive factors of selection and failure of ambulatory procedures.

METHOD

Surgeons of the French "Club Hernie" prospectively gathered data concerning IHR over a period of almost 5years within a nationwide database.

RESULTS

A number of patients (1429) were operated on during the period of the study. The mean age was 63.3 (22-97) years old. An ambulatory procedure was planned in 305 (21%) patients. Among these, 272 (89%) IHR were effectively performed as one-day procedures. Upon multivariate analysis, predictive factors influencing practitioners for not propose an ambulatory care were increasing age (OR 0.97, P<0.001), body mass index (OR 0.95, P<0.001), ASA grade≥III (OR 0.23, P<0.001), hernia width≥4cm (OR 0.44, P<0.001), recurrent hernia (OR 0.55, P=0.01) and a laparoscopic IHR (OR 0.54, P<0.001). A number of patients (1157) were not selected preoperatively for outpatient IHR mainly because of organizational issues or an ASA grade≥III. Medical or social reasons were the main causes of failure of initially planned ambulatory settings.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory IHR is a safe and feasible practice subject to a good preoperative selection of the patients. Increasing age, body mass index, ASA grade≥III, hernia width≥4cm, recurrent hernia and a laparoscopic IHR were identified to be preoperative factors for not proposing an ambulatory care. One-day surgery for IHR could be systematically proposed for IHR of small incisional hernias (<4cm) in young patients with few comorbidities.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of methods of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia repairs are common and have high recurrence rates. They are usually repaired laparoscopically with an intraperitoneal mesh, which can be fixed in various ways. The aim was to evaluate the recurrence rates for the different fixation techniques.

METHODS

This systematic review included studies with human adults with a ventral hernia repaired with an intraperitoneal onlay mesh. The outcome was recurrence at least 6 months after operation. Cohort studies with 50 or more participants and all RCTs were included. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched on 22 September 2016. RCTs were assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and cohort studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Studies comparing fixation techniques were included in a network meta-analysis, which allowed comparison of more than two fixation techniques.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies with a total of 6553 participants were included. The overall crude recurrence rates with the various fixation techniques were: absorbable tacks, 17·5 per cent (2 treatment groups); absorbable tacks with sutures, 0·7 per cent (3); permanent tacks, 7·7 per cent (20); permanent tacks with sutures, 6·0 per cent (25); and sutures, 1·5 per cent (6). Six studies were included in a network meta-analysis, which favoured fixation with sutures. Although statistical significance was not achieved, there was a 93 per cent chance of sutures being better than one of the other methods.

CONCLUSION

Both crude recurrence rates and the network meta-analysis favoured fixation with sutures during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy can be successfully performed for uncomplicated appendicitis: A Southwestern Surgical Congress multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Many laparoscopic procedures are now performed on an outpatient basis. We hypothesize laparoscopic appendectomy can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure.

METHODS

Seven institutions adopted a previously described outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy protocol for uncomplicated appendicitis. Patients were dismissed unless there was a clinical indication for admission. Patient demographics, success with outpatient management, time of dismissal, morbidity, and readmissions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred six men and one hundred seventy women with a mean age of 35.4 years were included in the protocol. Seventy-eight patients (21%) had pre-existing comorbidities. 299 patients (80%) were managed as outpatients. There were no conversions to open appendectomy. Postoperative morbidity was 5%. The time of patient dismissals was evenly distributed throughout the day and night. Twelve patients (3%) required readmission. Outpatient follow-up occurred in 63% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

An outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy protocol was successfully applied at multiple institutions with low morbidity and low readmission rates. Application of this practice nationally could reduce length of stay and decrease overall health care costs for acute appendicitis.

Feasibility of laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction in an outpatient community-hospital setting using cPTFE prosthetic mesh: a prospective, multicenter case series

Objective

This study investigated the use of prosthetic condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (cPTFE) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) in an outpatient community-hospital setting.

Methods

Patients underwent LVHR with cPTFE at one of three community hospitals. Primary endpoint was hernia recurrence at 1-year postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included pain, surgical site infection, medical/surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

This study included 65 females and 52 males, aged 46.6 ± 13.2 years (mean ± SD; range 18–84 years). Mean prosthetic size was 413.8 ± 336.11 cm² (range 165–936 cm²). Mean follow-up was 30 months (range 12–46 months). Hernia recurrence rate was 4.3%. Rate of hospitalization in the first postoperative week was 2.6%. Early and late secondary endpoint complication rates were 24.8% and 27.4%, respectively; pain was the most common complication, followed by seroma (8.5%).

Conclusions

Outpatient LVHR using cPTFE is feasible in community hospitals. Complication rates were similar to previous reports, and the seroma rate was markedly lower.

Laparoscopic management of non-midline incisional hernia: A multicentric study

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic repair of non-midline ventral hernia (LNM) has been debated. The aim of this study is to analyze our experience performing the laparoscopic approach to non-midline ventral hernias (NMVHs) in Northwest Italy for 6 years.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients who underwent LNM between March 2008 and March 2014 in the selected institutions were analyzed. We retrospectively analyzed the peri- and postoperative data and the recurrence rate of four subgroups of NMVHs: subcostal, suprapubic, lumbar, and epigastric. We also conducted a literature review.

RESULTS

No difference was found between the four subgroups in terms of demographic data, defect characteristics, admission data, and complications. Subcostal defects required a shorter operating time. Obesity was found to be a risk factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, subcostal defects were easier to perform, with a lower recurrence rate, lesser chronic pain, and faster surgical performance. A more specific prospective randomized trial with a larger sample is awaited. Based on our experience, however, the laparoscopic approach is a safe treatment for NMVHs in specialized centers.

Surgical treatment of subcostal incisional hernia with polypropylene mesh - analysis of late results

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of subcostal incisional hernia repair using polypropylene mesh, the technical aspects of musculo-aponeurotic reconstruction, routine fixation of supra-aponeurotic mesh and follow-up for five years.METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that assessed 24 patients undergoing subcostal incisional hernia repair with use of polypropylene mesh; 15 patients (62.5%) were female; ages ranged from 33 to 82, and 79.1% had comorbidities.RESULTS: Early complications: three cases (12.5%) of wound infection, three cases (12.5%) of seroma, one case (4.1%) of hematoma; and one case (4.1%) of wound dehiscence. Late complications occurred in one case (4.1%) of hernia recurrence attributed to technical failure in the fixation of the mesh and in one case (4.1%) of chronic pain. There were no cases of exposure or rejection of the mesh.CONCLUSION: The subcostal incisional hernia, though not very relevant, requires adequate surgical treatment. Its surgical correction involves rebuilding the muscle-aponeurotic defect, supra-aponeurotic fixation of polypropylene mesh, with less complexity and lower rates of complications and recurrences.

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in an ambulatory surgery-extended recovery centre: a review of 259 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

The high prevalence of incisional hernias and an average stay of 3-10 days for open procedures have made this pathology both a health problem and an economic issue. A protocol was developed for performing this procedure in an Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) with extended recovery.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2011, data about all laparoscopic incisional hernia repairs were gathered prospectively. The patients' clinical features, hernia type, intraoperative and postoperative complications and reasons for hospital admission are studied.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients have been operated for incisional hernia (185) or recurrent hernioplasty (74) in our ASC. Laparoscopic repair was successful in 254 patients (98.07 %). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in five patients (1.93 %). A total of 50 patients (19.69 %) in whom surgery was completed laparoscopically were discharged the same day of surgery, 179 (70.47 %) at 24 h and 25 (9.84 %) required a stay of over 24 h. Postoperative pain was severe in 10 % of patients, moderate in 40 %, and mild in 50 %. Complications, mostly minor and self-limiting, were observed in 25 patients (9.84 %) during hospital stay. Five major complications that occured were: bile peritonitis, an acute peritonitis, due to an inadvertent intestinal perforation, and one intestinal obstruction by partial detachment of the mesh, an intra-abdominal hematoma and a colo-cutaneous fistula. There were no deaths in the series. The mean follow-up of patients was 29.35 months (range 12-129 months). The recurrence rate was 7.03 % (n = 18). Four trocar-site hernias were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

It is essential to create a protocol with selection criteria that take into account the patient, his entourage, the anesthetic-surgical procedure, and a team dedicated to surgical laparoscopic surgery in an ASC with extended recovery to achieve good results in terms of morbidity and patient safety.

Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference

PURPOSE

The laparoscopic treatment of ventral incisional hernias is the object of constant attention and is becoming increasingly widespread in the international scientific-surgical community; however, there is ample debate on its technical details and indications. In order to establish a common approach on laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair, the first Italian Consensus Conference was organized in Naples (Italy) on 14-15 January 2010.

METHODS

The format of the Consensus Conference was freely adapted from the standards of the National Institute of Health and the Italian Health Institute. The parties involved included the followings: a Promotional Committee, a Scientific Committee, a group of Experts, the Jury Panel and a Scientific Secretariat.

RESULTS

Eleven statements, regarding three large chapters on the indications, the technical details and the management of complications were drafted on the basis of literature references collected by the Scientific Committee, documents developed by the Experts, reports presented and discussed during the Consensus Conference, and discussion among the members of the Jury.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach is safe and effective for defects larger than 3 cm in diameter; old age, obesity, previous abdominal operations, recurrence and strangulation are not absolute contraindications. Ensuring an adequate overlap, careful adhesiolysis and correct fixing of the prosthesis are among the technical details recommended. Complications and recurrences are comparable to, and in some cases, less numerous than with the open approach.

Laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernia. State of the art in 2012

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the results of laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias using intra-peritoneal prosthetic mesh through a review of published surgical series.

METHODS

All large series of patients treated for an incisional hernia by laparoscopy and published between 2002 and 2011 were identified. The results of controlled randomized series comparing this technique with open surgical repair were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two series with a total of 7057 patients were analyzed (range 51-1242); the mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 32 (range: 28.5-46), and the mean size of the hernia defect was 10.6 cm (range: 6-14.9 cm). The mean rate of conversion to open surgical repair was 2.7%. Mean operative duration was 90 ± 33 minutes. Mortality was 0.8%, usually due to an unrecognized intestinal injury (1.6%), which occurred more frequently with second or iterative hernia repairs. Hospital stay averaged 2.5 days. The infection rate was 0.3% and the rate of hernia recurrence was 4.6% (with a mean follow-up of 36 months). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of post-operative complications or hernia recurrence in the randomized studies comparing laparoscopic to open anterior abdominal surgical repair. However, duration of hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopy in some studies.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia is technically feasible and reliable for large hernia defects, even in obese patients. This approach should be reserved for patients with no history of previous hernia repair in order to avoid the risk of intestinal injury. It appears to allow for a shortened duration of hospitalization.

A prospective study of safety and satisfaction with same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study examines the safety and patient satisfaction in discharging children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LapAppy) for acute appendicitis on the day of surgery.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, data were collected prospectively for 158 consecutive patients undergoing LapAppy for simple appendicitis. Time from operation to discharge and complications were analyzed. At follow-up, parents completed a satisfaction survey. The Student t test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 158 children ranging from age 2 to 19 years (mean, 12 years) over a 6-month period. Single-port, single-instrument LapAppy was possible in 152 patients (96%). Eighty percent of patients (n = 126) were discharged on the day of surgery, a mean of 4.8 hours postoperatively (range, 1-12 hours). Of the remaining 32, 24 (75%) were admitted because the operation ended too late for postoperative discharge; 3 (9%), for medical reasons; and 5 (16%), when the families declined to leave. One hundred nine parents (87%) whose children went home postoperatively stated that they were happy with the expeditious discharge, whereas 17 (13%) felt nervous. In addition, 116 parents (92%) stated that, in retrospect, same-day discharge was preferable, whereas 10 parents (8%) were not sure that it was the best decision. None, however, would insist on admission if faced with the situation again. There were no major complications and no significant difference in the rate of umbilical wound infections for same-day discharge patients (2%) and admitted patients (3%).

CONCLUSION

Routine same-day discharge after pediatric LapAppy for acute appendicitis is safe, with good parent satisfaction.

Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been developed in order to increase patients' satisfaction and to save bed costs. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ambulatory surgery in patients undergoing elective fundoplication for GERD.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently searched and identified 15 prospective or retrospective nonrandomized studies dealing with ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD in the Medline, Cancerlit, and Embase databases between January 1990 and July 2010. Outcomes were postoperative mortality, morbidity, conversion and reoperation rates, mean operative time, hospital admission or readmission, unexpected consultation, and patient satisfaction. Because only one comparative study was identified, data compilation and relative risk evaluation through meta-analysis were not possible.

RESULTS

A total of 1459 adult patients underwent an ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD, 876 in a day-case setting and 583 in an outpatient setting. The procedure appears feasible for selected patients and expert surgeons, and it has a very low mortality rate and conversion, reoperation, and overall morbidity rates of 3.6, 0.6, and 11.1%, respectively. Hospital admission, nonprogrammed consultation, and hospital readmission rates were as high as 20, 11, and 12%, respectively. No study looked at comparative long-term functional results between ambulatory and inpatient procedures. Patient satisfaction rates based on self-evaluation were high.

CONCLUSION

The data available to date in the literature, mostly of level 4 evidence, suggest that laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD appears to be safe and feasible in a day-surgery setting, subject to careful patient selection and surgeon expertise. Randomized control trials are urgently needed to better evaluate this promising care management.

Long-Term Outcomes with Transfascial Sutures versus Tacks in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Review

Although most surgeons report using both transfascial sutures and laparoscopically placed tacks to secure prostheses in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, a significant minority have reported large series in which sutures were omitted. A systematic review of the available literature was conducted for large case series and controlled trials documenting long-term follow-up. Forty-three articles were identified, including 6015 patients whose prostheses were secured with transfascial sutures (with or without tacks), and 2450 patients receiving tacks or staples alone. The mean follow-up time reported was 30.1 months. No significant difference was found in rates of hernia recurrence, mesh removal, prolonged postoperative pain, patient body mass index, or hernia defect size between the two groups. The suture group did experience a significantly higher rate of surgical site infection. Although suture tensile strength is greater than that of tacks, and despite numerous anecdotal reports of hernia recurrence secondary to suture failure or omission, the existing literature does not show superiority of one mesh fixation technique over the other for recurrence, whereas infection rates increase when transfascial suture is used.

Repair of complex incisional hernias using double prosthetic repair: single-surgeon experience with 50 cases

BACKGROUND

The treatment of complex incisional hernias is still difficult and controversial. With technologic developments we can modify and update the operative techniques described for treating complex abdominal wall hernias.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 50 patients with complex incisional hernias undergoing complex abdominal wall herniorrhaphy at a university hospital. All patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic dedicated to abdominal wall reconstruction. All patients underwent pre-operative computed tomography. Complex incisional hernias were regarded as those with multiple recurrences (>3 times), a previous mesh complicated by fistula and chronic infection, giant diffuse lumbar hernias, an associated parastomal hernia, or hernias developing after bariatric surgery. The operative technique was a double reconstruction prosthetic mesh. The type of repair as well as clinical, operative, and follow-up data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eight patients had considerable loss of tissue, 5 had trophic skin lesions, and 2 had chronic suppurative infection. The mean size of the defects was 18.2 cm. Morbidity included 5 cases of seroma, 2 neuralgias, and 2 cutaneous necroses. The mean duration of hospital stay was 5 days (range, 2-9). Complete follow-up (mean, 48 months; range, 12-108) showed no recurrent hernias.

CONCLUSION

While awaiting a longer follow-up to confirm the results, we conclude that complex incisional hernias can be repaired safely and with a low morbidity and recurrence rate by means of a double prosthetic repair technique.

Open incisional hernia repair under local anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

The Authors give an accurate description of a method of incisional hernia repair with an open technique, under local anaesthesia. The aim of this work was to show the feasibility and safety of an open preperitoneal mesh technique, as well as giving a description of technical details and the results of incisional hernia repair under local anaesthesia.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and February 2008, 129 patients underwent an open mesh surgical procedure for incisional hernia. Using some simple selection criteria: maximal diameter of the hernia orifice not greater than 10 cm, the reducibility of the hernia sack, the absence of bowel obstructive symptoms, 71 patients (55.03%) were selected to be submitted to a local anaesthesia procedure, performing an open mesh repair.

RESULTS

The median operative time was 101 min. The intra-operative measurement of the hernia defect showed that: in 24 patients (33.8%) it was < 3 cm, in 37 patients (52.2%) up to 10 cm and in ten patients (14%) > 10 cm. There were only two conversions to general anaesthesia (2.8%). Among the other 69 patients only four patients (5.7%) showed transient intra-operative bradycardia. All the other 69 patients (97.2%) had immediate postoperative deambulation. Forty-four of them (63.4%) were discharged within 24 h. During follow-up (12-168 months) only two recurrences (2.8%) were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience clearly shows that local anaesthesia for incisional hernia repair with a open preperitoneal mesh technique is feasible, safe, and effective, having a low intra-operative risk, being cost-effective and showing very good long-term results.

Current indications for laparoscopy in day-case surgery

Day-surgery setting allows to combine patients' satisfaction to cost-saving policies that seems to be more and more important for a modern hospital management. Minimally invasive surgery seems to be the ideal surgical approach for day-case procedures since, reducing trauma to a minimal level, allows patients to return quick to a normal life with minimal nursing assistance. Extensive review of the most recent article has been performed in this article in order to define the current evidences that support the use of laparoscopic surgery in a day-case setting. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, anti-reflux procedure and hernia repair seems to be justified according to the results of the published data. Patients' selection and hospital organization seem to be mandatory in order to obtain successful results.