Palliative management of esophagorespiratory fistula in esophageal malignancy

Minimally invasive management of esophageal perforation

Esophageal perforation is a medical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of this life-threatening condition. Conventional treatment of esophageal perforation is surgical. However, more recently, endoscopic treatment has become the treatment of choice given its less invasive nature compared to surgical treatment. This includes endoscopic clip administration, endoscopic stent placement, endoscopic suturing, endoscopic vacuum therapy and tissue sealants which are all administered via the endoluminal route. Whilst small defects (<2 cm) may be closed with endoscopic clips, larger defects require stent placement or suturing. Removable esophageal stent is an effective method of treatment in cases with esophageal perforation as they allow minimal invasive repair of perforation and rapid nutrition. Endoscopic suturing can be used both to fix the stent to prevent migration and to primarily close the perforation. If perforation is associated with a mediastinal collection, drainage is mandatory and this procedure can be performed by computed tomography guided percutaneous drainage, thoracoscopy or endoscopic vacuum therapy. In some cases, a combination of these minimally invasive methods is required. Since endoscopic methods provide better quality of life and outcomes and shorten length of hospitalization, such methods have become the treatment of choice for esophageal perforation.

A case of separation surgery with drainage tube-less (DRESS) esophagostomy for advanced cancer with a respiratory fistula

INTRODUCTION

An esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) can cause severe pneumonia or a lung abscess which progresses to life-threatening sepsis. A case of a patient with esophageal cancer and an esophagopulmonary fistula (EPF) who underwent separation surgery with drainage tube-less (DRESS) esophagostomy and was promptly started on definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is reported.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 79-year-old man visited a clinic with a month-long history of dysphagia. Esophageal cancer at the middle thoracic esophagus was detected, and invasion of the left main bronchus and lower lobe of the right lung was seen on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Three weeks later, the patient was transferred to our hospital. CT showed a lung abscess in the lower lobe of the right lung that continued into the adjacent esophageal cancer. Due to the EPF, the patient underwent emergency surgery that consisted of esophageal separation surgery and double bilateral esophagostomy and enterostomy. Definitive CRT for the esophageal cancer was started from postoperative day 25. At six-month follow-up, the patient achieved relapse-free survival.

DISCUSSION

Separation surgery with a DRESS esophagostomy provides good control of inflammation because of division of the respiratory tract from the alimentary tract, which allows prompt initiation of CRT. Alternatively, a DRESS esophagostomy allows patients to be free from any tube trouble.

CONCLUSION

Separation surgery with a DRESS esophagostomy for an ERF is a promising method to improve patient quality of life that is less invasive, controls inflammation, and facilitates subsequent definitive CRT.

Self-expandable metal stent for malignant esophagorespiratory fistula: predictive factors associated with clinical failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas (MERFs) usually are managed by the placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) but with conflicting results. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with clinical failure after SEMS placement for the treatment of MERFs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database used at a tertiary-care cancer hospital, with patients treated with SEMS placement for MERFs between January 2009 and February 2016. Logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for clinical outcomes and to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and comparisons were made by using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients (55 male, mean age 59 years) were included in the study, and 70 were considered for the final analysis (1 failed stent insertion). Clinical failure occurred in 44% of patients. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3 or 4 and fistula development during esophageal cancer treatment were associated with an increased risk of clinical failure. ECOG status of 3 or 4, pulmonary infection at the time of SEMS placement, and prior radiation therapy were predictive factors associated with lower overall survival. Dysphagia scores improved significantly 15 days after stent insertion. The overall stent-related adverse event rate was 30%. Stent migration and occlusion caused by tumor overgrowth were the most common adverse events.

CONCLUSION

SEMS placement is a reasonable treatment option for MERFs; however, ECOG status of 3 or 4 and fistula development during esophageal cancer treatment may be independent predictors of clinical failure after stent placement.

Simultaneous Esophageal and Tracheal Fistulization Resulting From Pott's Abscess

We describe a case of a 30-year-old woman who presented with a complaint of coughing while drinking water, which began 2 months earlier and was treated with surgical repair of esophageal and tracheal fistulization that resulted from a Pott's abscess. The patient had been diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis 4 years previously and had been treated for 6 months. Esophageal and tracheal fistulization of the abscess cavity was observed both radiologically and intraoperatively. The fistulas were closed through separate operations for the trachea and the esophagus. Simultaneous esophageal and tracheal fistulization of a Pott's abscess is a serious complication of spinal tuberculosis that has not been previously reported in the literature.

Experience with stent implantation in malignant esophageal strictures: analysis of 1185 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the experience in endoprosthesis implantation in cases of malignant esophageal strictures.

METHODS

A total of 1185 consecutive patients underwent endoprosthesis implantation: through open surgery in 42 cases and by endoscopy in 1143 cases.

RESULTS

Stent implantation was performed successfully in 61.2% of cases. Dysphagia was resolved temporarily in 6.2% and permanently in 93.5% of cases. The score of dysphagia decreased from 1.93 to 0.38. Complications were detected in 23.7% of patients, and 69.2% of cases were treated by endoscopy. Wound complications were seen in 21.9% of patients intubated through surgery. The mean survival time of patients with esophageal intubation was 5.4 months and that of patients not eligible for stent implantation was 3.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent implantation improves the quality of life and gives an opportunity for adjuvant oncological therapy. Evaluation of morphologic anomalies is of considerable importance for achieving success in treatment through implantation.

[Palliative management of malignant oesophageal strictures with endoprosthesis implantation -- 25 years experience]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility of the use of oesophageal endoprosthesis based on a large series of cases.

METHODS

2952 malignant oesophageal strictures managed between 1984 and 2009 were analysed. While surgical intubation was carried out in 42 patients, endoscopic implantation was feasible in 1143 cases. Patients not eligible for oesophageal stenting were treated with gastrostomy in 125, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in 19, catheter jejunostomy in 9 and supportive therapy in 965 cases, respectively.

RESULTS

Endoprosthesis could have been inserted in 61.2% of the patients. Dysphagia was terminated temporarily in 6.2% and permanently in 93.5%. Complications were detected in 23.7% of the cases, which included stent migration, perforation, bleeding, airway obstruction, early unexpected death, aspiration, stent obstruction, tumor overgrowth, oesophago-respiratory fistula formation and neoformation, and reflux. Complications were treated endoscopically primarily (69.2%). Lethal complication rate was 2.1% (27 cases). Furthermore, complication rate of patients who underwent surgical stent insertion was 21.9%. Mean survival of patients with oesophageal intubation was 5.4 months, with nutritional support via gastrostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy 3.6 months and with supportive therapy alone 3.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal endoprosthesis insertion is an effective method for the palliative management of malignant oesophageal strictures. Stent implantation improves survival as well as quality of life. Methods used for nutritional support decreases hungriness but do not influence survival.