1
|
Dawkins B, Aruparayil N, Ensor T, Gnanaraj J, Brown J, Jayne D, Shinkins B. Cost-effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy as a means to increase provision of minimally invasive surgery for abdominal conditions in rural North-East India. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271559. [PMID: 35921367 PMCID: PMC9348710 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery, a minimally invasive technique to treat abdominal conditions, has been shown to produce equivalent safety and efficacy with quicker return to normal function compared to open surgery. As such, it is widely accepted as a cost-effective alternative to open surgery for many abdominal conditions. However, access to laparoscopic surgery in rural North-East India is limited, in part due to limited equipment, unreliable supplies of CO2 gas, lack of surgical expertise and a shortage of anaesthetists. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy as a means to increase provision of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for abdominal conditions in rural North-East India. A decision tree model was developed to compare costs, evaluated from a patient perspective, and health outcomes, disability adjusted life years (DALYs), associated with gasless laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopy or open abdominal surgery in rural North-East India. Results indicate that MIS (performed by conventional or gasless laparoscopy) is less costly and produces better outcomes, fewer DALYs, than open surgery. These results were consistent even when gasless laparoscopy was analysed using least favourable data from the literature. Scaling up provision of MIS through increased access to gasless laparoscopy would reduce the cost burden to patients and increase DALYs averted. Based on a sample of 12 facilities in the North-East region, if scale up was achieved so that all essential surgeries amenable to laparoscopic surgery were performed as such (using conventional or gasless laparoscopy), 64% of DALYS related to these surgeries could be averted, equating to an additional 454.8 DALYs averted in these facilities alone. The results indicate that gasless laparoscopy is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to open surgery for abdominal conditions in rural North-East India and provides a possible bridge to the adoption of full laparoscopic services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryony Dawkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Noel Aruparayil
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Ensor
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Julia Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - David Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Bethany Shinkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aruparayil N, Bolton W, Mishra A, Bains L, Gnanaraj J, King R, Ensor T, King N, Jayne D, Shinkins B. Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:6427-6437. [PMID: 34398284 PMCID: PMC8599349 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08677-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-income countries, laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach for many abdominal conditions. Conventional laparoscopy is a complex intervention that is challenging to adopt and implement in low resource settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum and open surgery for general surgery and gynaecological procedures. METHODS A search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, AJOL databases and Cochrane Library was performed from inception to January 2021. All randomised (RCTs) and comparative cohort (non-RCTs) studies comparing gasless laparoscopy with open surgery or conventional laparoscopy were included. The primary outcomes were mortality, conversion rates and intraoperative complications. SECONDARY OUTCOMES operative times and length of stay. The inverse variance random-effects model was used to synthesise data. RESULTS 63 studies were included: 41 RCTs and 22 non-RCTs (3,620 patients). No procedure-related deaths were reported in the studies. For gasless vs conventional laparoscopy there was no difference in intraoperative complications for general RR 1.04 [CI 0.45-2.40] or gynaecological surgery RR 0.66 [0.14-3.13]. In the gasless laparoscopy group, the conversion rates for gynaecological surgery were high RR 11.72 [CI 2.26-60.87] when compared to conventional laparoscopy. For gasless vs open surgery, the operative times were longer for gasless surgery in general surgery RCT group MD (mean difference) 10 [CI 0.64, 19.36], but significantly shorter in the gynaecology RCT group MD - 18.74 [CI - 29.23, - 8.26]. For gasless laparoscopy vs open surgery non-RCT, the length of stay was shorter for gasless laparoscopy in general surgery MD - 3.94 [CI - 5.93, - 1.95] and gynaecology MD - 1.75 [CI - 2.64, - 0.86]. Overall GRADE assessment for RCTs and Non-RCTs was very low. CONCLUSION Gasless laparoscopy has advantages for selective general and gynaecological procedures and may have a vital role to play in low resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Aruparayil
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - W Bolton
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A Mishra
- Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | - L Bains
- Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | | | - R King
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - T Ensor
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - N King
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - B Shinkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bielefeldt K, Saligram S, Zickmund SL, Dudekula A, Olyaee M, Yadav D. Cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia: how did we get there? Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59:2850-63. [PMID: 25193389 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3342-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The focus of biliary dyskinesia (BD) shifted within the last 30 years, moving from symptoms after cholecystectomy (CCY) to symptoms with morphological normal gallbladder, but low gallbladder ejection fraction. METHODS We searched the pubmed database to systematically review studies focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder dysfunction. RESULTS Impaired gallbladder contraction can be found in about 20% of healthy controls and an even higher number of patients with various other disorders. Surgery for BD increased after introduction of laparoscopic CCY, with BD now accounting for >20% of CCY in adults and up to 60% in pediatric patients. The majority of cases reported were operated in the USA, which differs from surgical series for cholelithiasis. Postoperative outcomes do not differ between groups with abnormal or normal gallbladder function. CONCLUSION Functional gallbladder testing should not be seen as an indicator of relevant biliary tract disease or prognostic marker to identify patients who may benefit from operative intervention. Instead biliary dyskinesia should be considered as a part of a spectrum of functional disorders, which are generally managed conservatively. Small proof of concept studies have demonstrated effects of medical therapy on biliary dysfunction and should thus be never tested in appropriately designed trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Bielefeldt
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|