Incidence and Predictors of Anal Incontinence After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in Primiparous Women

Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study

To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the ONIRY system for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) detection versus three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). A prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Spain. 152 women between the first moments up to 8 weeks after vaginal delivery. Participants underwent EAUS and were allocated to groups based on OASIS classification: A (no perineal tear), B (1st or 2nd degree tear), or C (3rd or 4th degree, anal sphincters affected). Electric impedance was measured in the anal canal using the ONIRY system. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic outcome of impedance spectroscopy versus EAUS. Adverse events were collected. Part II involved in silico modelling and 10-time 10-fold cross-validation for automated analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. 30 women were allocated to group A, 61 to group B, and 61 to group C. The diagnostic outcome was determined for 147 participants. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy were 87.0 ± 0.5%, 90.6 ± 2.0%, and 84.6 ± 1.9%, respectively, compared with EAUS. After data cleaning, the performance metrics of the proposed final ML model for ONIRY were: 90.0 ± 0.4%, 90.0 ± 1.2%, and 90.0 ± 0.7%, respectively. No adverse device effects or deficiencies were observed. By enabling early identification of sphincter injuries, ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy facilitates timely diagnosis and intervention, potentially reducing long-term complications such as faecal incontinence. Its rapid, bedside application in obstetric settings supports immediate postpartum care, complementing digital rectal examination and optimizing clinical decision-making.

The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) on symptoms and quality of life in women who experienced third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries, OASIS) during childbirth. OASIS can lead to anal incontinence and dyspareunia, having important implications regarding the quality of life and health of women but, unfortunately, there is no standard practice for postpartum care following OASIS.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, patients diagnosed with OASIS between January 2016 and June 2023 were enrolled. Since 2016, all women with OASIS have been routinely referred for physiatric evaluation and pelvic floor rehabilitation. Validated questionnaires (Wexner score and Marinoff scale) were administered to enrolled women to assess anal incontinence and dyspareunia.

RESULTS

The study included 148 women, of whom 88 responded to the questionnaires. Participants were divided into two groups: those who underwent PFPT (N = 68) and those who declined it (N = 20). The mean follow-up period was 1447.35 days. The Wexner score was lower in the PFPT group compared to the no-PFPT group (p = 0.050). The Marinoff score did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.381).

CONCLUSION

PFPT was shown to be effective in reducing AI symptoms in women with OASIS, improving quality of life and maintaining its effects in the long term, but without providing benefits for dyspareunia. Strengths of this study include the use of validated questionnaires, the long follow-up period, and the involvement of a specialized team of physiatrists and physiotherapists.

The Association Between Levator Ani Integrity and Postpartum Ano-Rectal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pregnancy and delivery are commonly associated with ano-rectal dysfunction. In addition, vaginal delivery may impact both the structure and functionality of the pelvic floor. Herein, we systematically reviewed the literature for the potential association between levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and ano-rectal function after childbirth.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, CENTRAL (Cochrane), Clinicaltrials.gov, and ICTRP databases from inception. We selected studies reporting on the anatomy of the LAM and ano-rectal function within 24 months after childbirth, the former determined by imaging and the latter measured through validated questionnaires or ano-rectal manometry. Meta-analyses were used to pool data from studies reporting on the association between LAM avulsion and ano-rectal function, with subgroup analysis according to the presence or absence of anal sphincter trauma. Summary odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) are reported with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

From the 7,621 studies identified, 11 were included, reporting on 2,146 women. Ten studies used transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and one study used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for LAM assessment. Ano-rectal function was assessed through validated questionnaires in all but one study, in which ano-rectal manometry was used. There was no evidence for an association between LAM avulsion and symptoms of incontinence (OR 1.75 [0.74, 4.12]; MD 0.13 [-0.58, 0.85]), including in the subgroup of patients with concomitant anal sphincter injury (OR 1.83 [0.71, 4.71]).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify an association between LAM avulsion and ano-rectal dysfunction following vaginal childbirth.

Guideline No. 457: Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) Part I: Prevention, Recognition, and Immediate Management

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this guideline is to promote recognition and preventive strategies for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Furthermore, it provides guidance on primary repair and immediate postpartum management for obstetrical anal sphincter tears in order to minimize further negative sequelae.

TARGET POPULATION

All patients having a vaginal delivery and those who have sustained an obstetrical anal sphincter injury.

OUTCOMES

Certain preventive strategies have been associated with lower rates of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (e.g., fetal head flexion and control, appropriate use of mediolateral episiotomy). Management strategies, including appropriate diagnosis and repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, antibiotic prophylaxis, and bowel and bladder function management can decrease associated short- and long-term complications.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline may increase detection, prevention, and appropriate management of obstetrical anal injuries, thus limiting the future burden associated with these injuries. Implementation of the recommended classification of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries will improve national and international research efforts.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, Ovid, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from September 1, 2014, through November 30, 2023, using appropriate MeSH terms (delivery, obstetrics, obstetric surgical procedures, obstetric labor complications, anal canal, episiotomy) and keywords (OASIS, obstetrical anal sphincter injury, anal injury, anal sphincter, vaginal delivery, suture, fecal incontinence, anal incontinence, overlap repair, end-to-end repair, bladder protocol, analgesia). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical practice guidelines. Results were limited to English- or French-language materials. Evidence was supplemented with references from the 2015 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada guideline no. 330.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetrical care providers.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Updated Canadian guideline on recognition, prevention and management of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Recovery from Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in a Prospective Cohort of First Births

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) for primiparous women who gave birth vaginally and to compare recovery by OASIS status in three domains as follows: (1) physical health and functioning, (2) mental health, and (3) healthcare utilization.

STUDY DESIGN

This secondary analysis used data from 2,013 vaginal births in the First Baby Study, a prospective cohort study of women with first births between 2009 and 2011. Interview data at multiple time points were linked to birth certificate and hospital discharge data. The key exposure of interest was OASIS (3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration, identified in the hospital discharge data; n = 174) versus no OASIS (n = 1,839). We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between OASIS and a range of outcomes including physical health and functioning, depression, and health care utilization, assessed at 1 month and 6 months postpartum.

RESULTS

Eight percent of women had OASIS. In adjusted models, there were no differences in general physical health and functioning measures by OASIS (such as fatigue and overall self-rated health), but women with OASIS had higher rates of reporting perineal pain (p < 0.001), accidental stool loss (p = 0.001), and bowel problems (p < 0.001) at 1-month postpartum. By 6-month postpartum, there were no differences in reported physical health and functioning. There were no differences in probable depression at 1- or 6-month postpartum. Women with OASIS were more likely to attend a comprehensive postpartum visit, but there were no other differences in health care utilization by OASIS.

CONCLUSION

Women with OASIS were at increased risk of accidental stool loss, bowel problems, and perineal pain in the immediate postpartum period. Women who had OASIS had similar physical functioning across a range of general health outcomes to women who gave birth vaginally without OASIS.

KEY POINTS

· Higher risk of bowel problems and accidental stool loss 1-month postpartum with OASIS.. · Higher risk of perineal pain 1-month postpartum with OASIS.. · No differences in health outcomes at 6-months postpartum by OASIS..

Trends in Management of Anal Fissures

BACKGROUND

It is unclear how patients with anal fissures are treated in real-world settings, particularly since patients may not see colorectal surgeons. This study describes trends in treatment with medical therapies (calcium-channel blockers [CCBs], nitroglycerin [NTG], and narcotics) and surgical treatments.

METHODS

Cohorts were created within the TriNetX database platform using codes for anal fissures and surgical interventions. Demographics were compared between patients that received surgical intervention within 1 year of diagnosis, CCB or NTG within 1 year (or preoperatively), or narcotics within 30 days or postoperatively vs those who did not.

RESULTS

121,213 patients were included of which 4.0% had surgical intervention. Factors associated with surgical intervention were male sex (OR 1.40), White race (OR 1.17), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.11). Male patients were more likely to undergo sphincterotomy (OR 1.49). Female (OR 1.27), non-Hispanic (OR 1.34), and White patients (OR 1.41) were more likely to have chemodenervation. Regarding nonoperatively managed patients, non-Hispanic (OR .91) and White patients (OR .89) were less likely to receive CCB/NTG. Male (OR 1.21), non-Hispanic (OR 1.08), and Black patients (OR 1.20) were more likely to receive narcotics. Male patients that required surgery were more likely to be prescribed CCB/NTG preoperatively (OR 1.27). Non-Hispanic surgical patients were more likely to receive narcotics (OR 1.84).

DISCUSSION

Male fissure patients were more likely to undergo surgical intervention other than chemodenervation. Differences in the rates of surgery and medical therapy (especially narcotics) between races and ethnicities require exploration to enhance the care of patients with anal fissures.

Irritable bowel syndrome worsens faecal incontinence after primary repair of major obstetric anal sphincter injuries

AIM

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) occur in approximately 3%-6% of vaginal deliveries and are the leading risk factor for late-onset faecal incontinence, which is an underdiagnosed pathology. The aim of this work was to use a validated scoring system to quantify the effect of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on the severity of faecal incontinence symptoms after primary repair of major OASIS (Grade IIIb-IV).

METHOD

A prospective cohort study was performed on all women who underwent primary repair of major OASIS over a 6-year period. They were assessed with ultrasonography within 12 weeks. Two control groups (who did not have OASIS) were women who underwent elective caesarean section and primigravid women. Questionnaires were sent at least 12 months after delivery, or at first consultation for primigravids, which generated the main outcome measures: Cleveland Clinic faecal incontinence severity scores and the presence of IBS based on Rome III criteria.

RESULTS

There was a total of 211 patients included in the three groups and the mean follow-up time was 26 months after sphincter repair. Ultrasonographic sphincter defects were detected in 37% but did not affect the faecal incontinence score (p = 0.47), except in patients with IBS. Within each group, patients with IBS had significantly worse faecal incontinence than those without. Women with both OASIS and IBS had the most severe faecal incontinence scores.

CONCLUSION

OASIS has a limited negative effect on faecal incontinence, independent of whether residual ultrasonographic sphincter defects are present. However, the presence of IBS has a significant compounding effect on faecal incontinence in OASIS patients. The effect of IBS on faecal incontinence is also notable in caesarean section patients and primigravids, suggesting that IBS is an independent risk-factor that should have its place in predelivery assessment and counselling.

Impact of the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Symptoms

IMPORTANCE

The associated effect of duration of the second stage of labor (SSL) on pelvic floor symptoms development is not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association between duration of SSL and pelvic floor symptoms at 6 months postpartum among primiparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

A planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial evaluating the impact of immediate versus delayed pushing on vaginal delivery rates, maternal morbidity, and neonatal outcomes was conducted between 2014 and 2018. For pelvic floor arm participants, demographic, pelvic examination, and validated questionnaire data were collected postpartum. Primary outcome was change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) score from immediate to 6 months postpartum. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire scores, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurements at 6 months postpartum. Participants were analyzed by SSL duration ≤60 minutes or >60 minutes.

RESULTS

Of the 2,414 trial participants, 767 (32%) completed pelvic floor assessments at 6 months. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 scores significantly improved at 6 months in the ≤60 minutes SSL group compared with >60 minutes SSL (-14.3 ± 48.0 and -3.2 ± 45.3, respectively; P = 0.04). Changes from immediate postpartum in total and subscale scores for other questionnaires at 6 months did not differ between groups. Prolapse stage did not differ between groups. Perineal body was significantly shorter in the >60 minutes SSL group (3.7 ± 0.7, 3.5 ± 0.8; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with SSL >60 minutes experience less improvement in PFDI-20 scores at 6 months. Greater tissue and innervation trauma in those with SSL >60 minutes may explain persistently less improvement in PFDI-20 scores.

Anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury significantly impacts quality of life for women: a cohort study

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence of anal incontinence (AI) after obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and its severity, as well as the risk factors for AI and AI episodes ≥ 6 months.

METHODS

This prospective and observational monocentric cohort study included all the women who had an OASIS between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2019. Information was collected by using a letter informing for the fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) questionnaire and by a phone interview. The main outcome measure was "1 passed or ongoing episode of AI".

RESULTS

Among the 227 patients included, 19.8% had ongoing AI, and 35.2% had AI passed or ongoing episodes. A total of 46.7% of women with AI reported a change in their quality of life in all fields of the FIQL. Excluding a history of inflammatory bowel disease, no factor was associated with the incidence of an AI episode. Post-obstetrical AI ≥ 6 months (POAI ≥ 6) represented 63.7% of AI cases. This incontinence began with significant incidence in the immediate postpartum period but increased over time, unlike AI < 6 months, which appeared primarily in the immediate postpartum period. Instrumental birth was a protective factor for POAI ≥ 6 (OR = 0.24; CI 95% [0.08-0.78]; p = 0.016), while an increase in parity and BMI were risk factors for POAI ≥ 6 (OR = 4.21; CI 95% [1.01-17.71]; p = 0.05 and OR = 1.15; CI 95% [1.03-1.30]; p = 0.016, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of AI after OASIS is not underestimated. Despite the fact that women do not seek care, the impact of AI on the quality of life is significant. A case of AI that lasts for 6 months after giving birth risks becoming chronic. Therefore, specialist advice should be recommended in this case.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

NCT04940494.

Does transperineal ultrasound predict the risk of perineal trauma in women with term pregnancy? A prospective observational study

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of perineal trauma during childbirth and to assess the correlations of the pelvic floor dimensions and fetal head station with obstetric trauma in a prospectively recruited cohort of women.

METHODS

The study included women with a gestational age of at least 37 weeks, who were carrying a single fetus in a cephalic presentation. Transperineal ultrasound (TPU) was performed prior to the onset of labor or labor induction. The purpose was to measure the anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the levator ani muscle (LAM) and the angle of progression, at both rest and maximum Valsalva maneuver. The head-perineum distance was assessed only at rest.

RESULTS

A total of 296 women were included. Of the 253 women who delivered vaginally, 19% (48/253) experienced no perineal trauma, 18.2% (46/253) received an episiotomy during childbirth, 34.4% (87/253) sustained a first-degree laceration, 25.3% (64/253) had a second-degree laceration, and 3.2% had a third- or fourth-degree laceration (8/253). Women with episiotomy had a significantly shorter median APD under Valsalva than women without perineal trauma. Furthermore, women with LAM coactivation (identified by a negative difference between the APD at Valsalva and the APD at rest) were approximately three times more likely to undergo an operative vaginal delivery and over five times more likely to sustain a third- or fourth-degree tear during childbirth than women who exhibited normal relaxation of the LAM during the Valsalva maneuver.

CONCLUSION

TPU may predict the risk of perineal trauma in women with term pregnancy during childbirth.

Anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury: Is there a difference between subtypes? A systematic review

AIMS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is associated with long-term anal incontinence (AI). We aimed to address the following questions: (a) are women with major OASI (grade 3c and 4) at higher risk of developing AI when compared to women with minor OASI (grade 3a and 3b)? (b) is a fourth-degree tear more likely to cause AI over a third-degree tear?

METHODS

A systematic literature search from inception until September 2022. We considered prospective and retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional and case-control studies without language restrictions. The quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to measure the effect of different grades of OASI.

RESULTS

Out of 22 studies, 8 were prospective cohort, 8 were retrospective cohort, and 6 were cross-sectional studies. Length of follow-up ranged from 1 month to 23 years, with the majority of the reports (n = 16) analysing data within 12-months postpartum. Third-degree tears evaluated were 6454 versus 764 fourth-degree tears. The risk of bias was low in 3, medium in 14 and high in 5 studies, respectively. Prospective studies showed that major tears are associated with a twofold risk of AI for major tears versus minor tears, while retrospective studies consistently showed a risk of fecal incontinence (FI) which was two- to fourfold higher. Prospective studies showed a trend toward worsening AI symptoms for fourth-degree tears, but this failed to reach statistical significance. Cross-sectional studies with long-term (≥5 years) follow-up showed that women with fourth-degree tear were more likely to develop AI, with an RR ranging from 1.4 to 2.2. Out of 3, 2 retrospective studies showed similar findings, but the follow-up was significantly shorter (≤1 year). Contrasting results were noted for FI rates, as only 5 out of 10 studies supported an association between fourth-degree tear and FI.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies investigate bowel symptoms within few months from delivery. Data heterogeneity hindered a meaningful synthesis. Prospective cohort studies with adequate power and long-term follow-up should be performed to evaluate the risk of AI for each OASI subtype.

Impact of sex and aging on radiographic and functional parameters of the anal sphincter complex in patients with accidental bowel leakage

AIMS

Treatment outcomes for accidental bowel leakage (ABL) may be influenced by age-related sarcopenia. We sought to determine if thickness of the anal sphincter complex on endoanal ultrasound correlated with function in women and men with ABL and if women demonstrated age-related anal sphincter thinning.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ABL presenting to our pelvic floor clinic from 2012 to 2017 were included. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. External anal sphincter (EAS), imaged by endoanal ultrasound at proximal, mid and distal locations, and IAS thickness were measured at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock; puborectalis muscle (PRM) was measured at 4, 6, and 8 o'clock; and averaged. Anorectal manometry was conducted when clinically indicated. Data were compared using Mann-Whitney tests and linear regression. Results are reported as mean ± SD or median (IQR).

RESULTS

Women (n = 136) were younger than men (n = 26) (61 ± 13 vs. 67 ± 13 years, p = 0.02). More women than men had pelvic surgery and less had colorectal surgery, spinal disorders, or a history of smoking (p < 0.05). Eighty-two percentage of women had an anal sphincter defect versus 31% of men (p < 0.01). All anal sphincter complex components were thinner in women than men with lower squeeze and resting pressures (p < 0.03), even in nulliparous women. Mean resting pressure was lower in older 6.1 (4.6-7.8) versus younger women 8.3 (5.0-12.9) mmHg, p = 0.04.

CONCLUSIONS

Women, even nulliparous, with ABL demonstrate thinner and weaker anal sphincters than men, Aging correlated with an increase in anal sphincter thickness, suggesting that age-related changes in the intrinsic components of the anal sphincter complex associated with ABL are complex and are not always well demonstrated on endoanal ultrasound.

Diagnostic capabilities of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) to evaluate anal sphincter defect post obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS)? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) is the gold standard imaging investigation for evaluating the anal sphincter; unfortunately, it is not universally available in most obstetric units. This study aims to appraise the ability of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) compared with 3D-EAUS as the gold standard to identify anal sphincter defects after primary repair of OASIS.

METHODS

A systematic search of major databases to identify diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TPUS in evaluating anal sphincter defects. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were designed for this systematic review. The risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Our eligibility criteria are patients with a history of primary repair of anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). They were followed up after the primary repair to detect the anal sphincter defect using 3D-TPUS vs. 3D-EAUS as a gold standard.

RESULTS

Two eligible observational studies were included and assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool and showed a low risk of bias and a low risk of concerns. 3D-TPUS had various sensitivity to detect external anal sphincter defects in two studies; meanwhile, the specificity was around 67-70%. For detecting the internal anal sphincter defects, 3D-TPUS had low sensitivity but high specificity (93-94%).

CONCLUSION

3D-TPUS had various sensitivity to detect external anal sphincter defects and low sensitivity to detect internal anal sphincter defects. On the other hand, 3D-TPUS had low specificity for detecting external anal sphincter defects and high specificity for detecting internal anal sphincter defects.

Severity and impact of accidental bowel leakage two decades after no, one, or two sphincter injuries

BACKGROUND

Information about the long-term severity and subjective impact of anal incontinence in women after 1 or 2 consecutive obstetrical anal sphincter injuries is still scarce and contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the severity and impact of anal incontinence among women with 2 previous deliveries 2 decades after birth and to analyze the relative effect of 1 vs 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in comparison with no obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and the possible influence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury on other pelvic floor disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

We linked prospectively registered data in the Swedish Medical Birth Register with information from a postal and web-based questionnaire in 2015. Statistics Sweden identified women with 2 vaginal births from 1992 to 1998, and a simple random sample of 11,000 women was drawn from a source cohort of 64,687 women. To achieve equal-sized groups of women with 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, the latter group was oversampled from 1987 to 2000. The final study cohorts consisted of 6760 women with no obstetrical anal sphincter injury, 357 women with 1 injury, and 324 women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears were grouped together for analysis. Anal incontinence was defined as either fecal or isolated gas incontinence, and fecal incontinence was defined as involuntary leakage of solid or liquid stool with or without concomitant gas. Frequencies of leakage of stool and gas were dichotomized into low frequency (less than once a month) and high frequency (several times a month or more often). Pairwise comparisons were analyzed using Fisher exact tests, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Trends were analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel statistics and the Spearman rank correlation test. Logistic regression models were used to obtain the age- and body-mass-index -adjusted odds ratios for outcomes. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.

RESULTS

The response rate was 65.5% in the randomly selected cohort and 70.1% among women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Bothersome fecal incontinence occurred in 3.3% (212/6458) of women without obstetrical anal sphincter injury, in 10.4% (36/345) (adjusted odds ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 2.23-4.73) of those with 1 injury, and in 16.5% (52/315) (adjusted odds ratio, 5.16; 95% confidence interval, 3.69-7.22) of those with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Fecal incontinence was perceived as bothersome in 28.2% (212/753) of women without an obstetrical anal sphincter injury compared with in 43.9% (36/82) and 46.0% (52/113) of those with 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Leakage of liquid stool occurred in 10.8% (724/6717) of those without injury, in 21.7% (77/355) of women with 1 injury, and 34.9% (113/324) of women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Incontinence affecting daily life was reported by 8.6% (577/6672) of women without injury and by 19.7% (69/351) and 29.6% (96/324) of women with 1 and 2 sphincter injuries, respectively (trend P<.0001). The mean Jorge-Wexner score was 2.44, 3.26, and 3.88 for women with no, 1, or 2 sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Among women with a Jorge-Wexner score of 6, >50% had bothersome anal incontinence. The adjusted odds ratio for the overall effect of 1 vs 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on measures of anal incontinence was 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.68-2.85) and 3.91 (95% confidence interval, 3.06-5.00), respectively, when compared with no obstetrical anal sphincter injury (both P<.0001). Having 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries had no significant effect on other pelvic floor disorders or on lower urinary tract symptoms (P=.73 and P=.69).

CONCLUSION

A consistent additive effect of 1 or 2 sphincter injuries on the severity and impact of anal incontinence was observed in women 2 decades after 2 vaginal births. This information is important for healthcare economics, clinical practice, and policy.

Prolonged Second Stage of Labor and Anal Sphincter Injury in a Contemporary Cohort of Term Nulliparas

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether a prolonged second stage of labor is an independent predictor of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in a contemporary cohort of nulliparous and term parturients, and to evaluate whether predelivery factors can accurately predict OASI.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a nested case-control study within a cohort of consecutive nulliparous term parturients with a singleton gestation who underwent a vaginal delivery at a single institution between January 2014 and January 2015. Cases were defined as women with a third- or fourth-degree laceration at the time of delivery, and controls were women without a third- or fourth-degree laceration. A prolonged second stage was defined as a second stage of ≥3 hours. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between prolonged second stage of labor and third- or fourth-degree lacerations. Receiver operator curves were developed to assess the predictive capacity of predelivery information for third- and fourth-degree lacerations.

RESULTS

Of 1,197 births, 63 women had third- or fourth-degree lacerations (5.3%). With each additional hour of the second stage, the rate of OASI increased, with 2.9% of women with a second stage of <1 hour with OASI, 3.5% between 1 and 2 hours, 5.7% between 2 and 3 hours, 7.8% between 3 and 4 hours, 16.1% between 4 and 5 hours, and 28.6% among women with a second stage length >5 hours (p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, operative vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.17-11.07) and a prolonged second stage (aOR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.06-3.51) were independent predictors of third- and fourth-degree lacerations. A predictive model was developed from these results (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68-0.81).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged second stage of labor is a predictor of OASI, after adjustment for operative vaginal delivery. A model using predelivery risk factors has a reasonable prediction of OASI.

KEY POINTS

· Prolonged second stage labor is associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury in term nulliparas.. · Predelivery risk factors reasonably predict obstetric anal sphincter injury in term nulliparas.. · Improved models are needed for clinical risk-stratification..

Can sonographic fetal head circumference measurement help predict Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury?

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) occur in 2 to 19% of vaginal deliveries in the United States. Neonatal parameters such as birthweight above 4000g or neonatal head circumference above 37 cm are known risk factors for OASIS. We hypothesized that sonographic fetal Head Circumference (sfHC) size assessed by ultrasound antenatally could help predict OASIS.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study between 2005 and 2016. Antenatal ultrasound Head Circumference (sfHC) assessment, maternal demographics, and labor and delivery data were abstracted and compared in women with and without OASIS.

RESULTS

Of 2057 pregnant women that had sfHC assessment, 121 (5.8%) had OASIS. In the unadjusted analysis, sfHC above the 90^th percentile was associated with OASIS OR 1.12 (1.02-1.23) p=0.015. When adjusted for gestational age at delivery, maternal age, race, prolonged 2^nd stage, BMI, infant gender, and intrapartum oxytocin use, sfHC above the 90^th percentile remained significantly associated with OASIS (OR=1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27, p=0.050).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, sfHC above the 90^th percentile was associated with a greater risk of OASIS. As OASIS significantly impacts short and long-term health outcomes such as perineal pain, dyspareunia, urinary and fecal incontinence, sfHC could be an additional antenatal marker to help clinicians counsel pregnant women about the risk of OASIS.

Association between birth weight and head circumference and obstetric anal sphincter injury severity

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for increasing severity of OASI and evaluate its possible correlation with two known risk factors-birth weight (BW) and neonatal head circumference (HC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at a university affiliated hospital between 2003 and 2019. We compared five groups of patients - according to presence and degree of perineal laceration - 3a, 3b, 3c and 4 and patients without OASI. Additionally, four parameters were defined to assess their relation to the severity of OASI: (1) BW ≥ 90th and HC < 90th percentiles; (2) BW < 90th and HC ≥ 90th percentile; (3) BW and HC ≥ 90th percentile and (4) BW and HC < 90th percentiles.

RESULTS

During the study period, 150,221 deliveries were evaluated. Parturients were allocated according to OASI severity - 455 patients had a 3rd (3a, 3b or 3c) or 4th degree perineal tear, while 110,966 patients had no OASI. Allocation to subgroups according to offspring anthropomorphic measures showed that as fetal size parameters increased, the rate of more severe tears increased, particularly in women delivering neonates with HC ≥ 90th percentile. Multinomial regression analysis was performed for each 3rd degree OASI subgroup. This analysis demonstrated the odds for OASI gradually increase with tear severity for BW ≥ 90th percentile and the combined BW and HC ≥ 90th percentile parameters, as compared with neonates with HC and BW < 90th percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Birth weight and head circumference above the 90th percentile are correlated with increased degree of OASI severity.

Which symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction does physiotherapy improve after an OASI?

OBJECTIVES

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) is associated with significant morbidity in the form of pelvic floor dysfunction, both in the immediate period of healing and long term. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of urinary, anorectal and sexual symptoms arising from OASI within 6 weeks after delivery at their first physiotherapy appointment (immediate postnatal) and 3-6 months after delivery following completion of physiotherapy (intermediate postnatal). Symptom prevalence were compared between the two time periods and the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy analysed to determine any changes in symptomology.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital, involved completion of a paper questionnaire by pelvic floor physiotherapists at the immediate postnatal review and by consultant gynaecologists at the intermediate postnatal review. Data were then compared to determine changes in symptoms using Fisher Exact tests and Mann Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Of the 131 women seen within 6 weeks of delivery, follow-up data at 3-6 months were collected for 96. There was a significant improvement in pain on defecation (P = 0.008), rectal bleeding on wiping (P = 0.0233) and women's ability to defer a bowel motion (P = 0.0001) however faecal incontinence did not improve significantly even with supervised physiotherapy. Urinary symptoms including stress incontinence, urgency and nocturia also significantly improved at P = 0.0097, P = 0.0045 and P < 0.0001, respectively. For the sexual domain, significantly more women had resumed intercourse (P < 0.0001) and started using contraception (P < 0.0001) by the follow up appointment.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that physiotherapy is valuable in the treatment of urinary symptoms after delivery but does not have the same impact on faecal incontinence. Further investigation is required to confirm if early anal symptomology may be a predictor of long-term adverse outcomes.

Prediction model for obstetric anal sphincter injury using machine learning

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a complication with substantial maternal morbidity. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model that would allow a personalized prediction algorithm for OASI, based on maternal and fetal variables collected at admission to labor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital. Included were term deliveries (live, singleton, vertex). A comparison was made between women diagnosed with OASI and those without such injury. For formation of a machine learning-based model, a gradient boosting machine learning algorithm was implemented. Evaluation of the performance model was achieved using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised 98,463 deliveries, of which 323 (0.3%) were diagnosed with OASI. Applying a machine learning model to data recorded during admission to labor allowed for individualized risk assessment with an AUC of 0.756 (95% CI 0.732-0.780). According to this model, a lower number of previous births, fewer pregnancies, decreased maternal weight and advanced gestational week elevated the risk for OASI. With regard to parity, women with one previous delivery had approximately 1/3 of the risk for OASI compared to nulliparous women (OR = 0.3 (0.23-0.39), p < 0.001), and women with two previous deliveries had 1/3 of the risk compared to women with one previous delivery (OR = 0.35 (0.21-0.60), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our machine learning-based model stratified births to high or low risk for OASI, making it an applicable tool for personalized decision-making upon admission to labor.

Effect of a subsequent pregnancy on anal sphincter integrity and function after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI)

Introduction and hypothesis

Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and anal manometry are used in the assessment women with a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), both postpartum and in a subsequent pregnancy, to aid counselling regarding mode of delivery (MOD).

Methods

A prospective observational study between 2012 to 2020 was completed. Women were reviewed 3 months postpartum following OASI and in the second half of a subsequent pregnancy. Anorectal symptoms were measured using the validated St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS: asymptomatic to mild symptoms = ≤ 4). Anal manometry (incremental maximum squeeze pressure [iMSP: normal = > 20 mmHg]) and EAUS (abnormal = sphincter defect > 1 h in size) were performed.

Results

One hundred forty-six women were identified and 67.8% had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h in size postnatally. In those with a defect ≤ 1 h, postpartum mean iMSP and SMIS significantly improved in a subsequent pregnancy (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). In women with a defect > 1 h, there was no significant difference between the mean iMSP or SMIS score postnatally compared to a subsequent pregnancy. At both time points, significantly more women had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h and SMIS of ≤ 4 (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively) compared to those with a defect < 1 h. In addition, significantly more women had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h and iMSP ≥ 20 mmHg (p < 0.001). Overall, out of the 146 women included in this study, 76 (52.1%) with a defect ≤ 1 h also had an iMSP ≥ 20 mmHg and SMIS ≤ 4 at 3 months postpartum.

Conclusions

Women who remain asymptomatic with normal anal manometry and no abnormal sphincter defects on EAUS postnatally do not need to have these investigations repeated in a subsequent pregnancy and can be recommended to have a vaginal delivery. If our protocol was modified, over half of the women in this study could have had their MOD recommendation made in the postnatal period alone.

The impact of a nationwide hands-on workshop on the diagnostic rates and management of obstetrical anal sphincter Injuries in Israel

AIM

The aim was to evaluate the influence of a half day, hands-on, workshop on the detection and repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs).

METHOD

Starting in February 2011, hands-on workshops for the diagnosis and repair of OASIs were delivered by trained urogynaecologists in departments of tertiary medical centres in Israel. The structure of the hands-on workshop resembles the workshop organized at the International Urogynecological Association annual conferences. Participants included medical staff, midwives and surgical residents from each medical centre. We collected data regarding the rate of OASIs, 1 year before and 1 year following the workshop, in 11 medical centres. The study population was composed of parturients with the following inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation and vaginal delivery. Pre-viable preterm gestations (< 24 weeks), birth weight < 500 g, stillborn, and those with major congenital anomalies, multifoetal pregnancies, breech presentations and caesarean deliveries were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

In the reviewed centres, 70 663 (49.3%) women delivered prior to the workshop (pre-workshop group) and 72 616 (50.7%) women delivered following the workshop (post-workshop group). Third- or fourth-degree perineal tears occurred in 248 women (0.35%) before the workshop, and in 328 (0.45%) following the workshop, a significant increase of 28.7% (P = 0.002). The increase in diagnosis was significant also in women with third-degree tears alone, 226 women (0.32%) before the workshop and 298 (0.41%) following the workshop, an increase of 28.3% (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The detection rate of OASIs has significantly increased following the hands-on workshop. The implementation of such programmes is crucial for increasing awareness and detection rates of OASI following vaginal deliveries.

Self-management of accidental bowel leakage and interest in a supportive m-Health app among women

INTRODUCTION

Self-management with clinician guidance is a cornerstone of successful conservative treatment for accidental bowel leakage (ABL). There are currently few resources to assist patients with that essential self-management. The purpose of this study was to describe self-management of ABL and explore interest in a mobile health application (m-Health app) for supporting ABL self-management among community-living women.

METHODS

Using an observational/descriptive design, women (18+ years) previously seen in a urogynecology clinic for ABL were mailed a survey containing eight multiple-choice questions and an open-ended prompt for comments.

RESULTS

Survey responses were received from 161 women (18% response rate). The highest percentage of participants was aged 61-70 years (39%). Nearly half of the participants (47%) "did not know anything" about ABL self-management before visiting a clinician. Only 4% "knew a lot." Of those who have been trying to self-manage their ABL (n = 132), 37% reported that it was not effective, and only 5% thought their self-management was "very effective." Half (50%) of the participants had "a lot of" interest in an m-Health app to support managing ABL, and 30% had "some" interest. The vast majority (89%) thought that it was "very important" to have ongoing guidance and support for self-managing ABL.

CONCLUSIONS

Before visiting a clinician, most women with ABL lacked knowledge about ABL self-management, and their self-management was not very effective. Women thought having guidance to self-manage ABL was important. There would be good interest among women in an m-Health app supporting self-management of ABL if one were created.

Obstetrical and epidemiological factors influence the severity of anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is one of the most severe obstetrical complications. Although risk factors for OASI have been identified, little is known about various parameters that can influence symptoms' severity. The aim of this study is to explore whether obstetrical and epidemiological factors can have an effect on the severity of symptoms after OASI.

METHODS

11.483 deliveries between January 2010 and December 2014 were reviewed, and data from 88 women with OASI are presented.

RESULTS

The only statistically significant differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic women were age (p = 0.02), body mass index (p = 0.04) and the use of forceps (p = 0.04). Women with more severe symptoms were more likely to have received oxytocin during the second stage of labor (p = 0.03) and had shorter delivery to follow-up interval (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Modifiable factors such as use of forceps and oxytocin should be taken into consideration in clinical practice.

The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

A low rate of primary cesarean delivery is expected to reduce some of the major complications that are associated with a repeat cesarean delivery, such as uterine rupture, adhesive placental disorders, hysterectomy, and even maternal death. Since 2014, and in alignment with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, we changed our approach to labor dystocia, defined as abnormal progression of labor, by allowing a longer duration of the second stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of prolonging the second stage of labor on the rate of cesarean delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a historical control group, we compared maternal and neonatal outcomes over 2 periods. Period I (9300 patients): from May 2011 until April 2014, when a prolonged second stage in nulliparous women was considered after 3 hours with regional anesthesia or 2 hours if no such anesthesia was provided. Second-stage arrest was defined in multiparous women after 2 hours with regional anesthesia or 1 hour without it. Period II (10,531 patients): from May 2014 until April 2017, allowed nulliparous and multiparous women continuing the second stage of labor an additional 1 hour before diagnosing second-stage arrest. Singleton deliveries at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation were initially considered for eligibility. We excluded women with high-risk pregnancies and known fetal anomalies. For comparing means, we used the t test. If variables were not normally distributed, we used the Mann-Whitney test instead. For comparing proportions, we used the χ² test with continuity correction.

RESULTS

The primary cesarean delivery was decreased in nulliparous women from 23.3% (819 of 3515) in period I to 15.7% (596 of 3796) in period II (relative risk [RR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74), a trend that was also significant in multiparous women (10.9%, 623 of 5785, in period I vs 8.1%, 544 of 6735, in period II; RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84). The rate of operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women was higher in period II than in period I (19.2%, 732 of 3515, vs 17.7%, 622 of 3796, P < .0001). Rates of third- and fourth-degree laceration and of shoulder dystocia were also higher in period II. The rate of arterial cord pH < 7.0 and the rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were higher in period II, but the early neurological outcome was not different when comparing the 2 periods.

CONCLUSION

The new policy of labor management successfully decreased primary cesarean deliveries, with a small rise in instrumental deliveries. However, it also increased the other immediate maternal and neonatal complications. A higher rate of lower umbilical artery cord pH was the most significant finding; however, the early neurological outcome did not change. It is possible that the ongoing adjustment to the new labor protocol will avoid, in the future, maternal and neonatal complications. The long-term maternal and neonatal consequences of our new approach will be evaluated in future studies.

Anorectal symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective cohort study

AIM

The aim was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of anal symptoms prepartum and postpartum.

METHOD

A prospective observational cohort study was carried out in Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. Ninety-four pregnant women between their 19th and 25th week of pregnancy were included. An anal symptom questionnaire was filled in at four different times: in the second and third trimester, immediately postpartum and 3 months postpartum. Descriptive data were obtained from patient files. A proctological diagnosis was presumed on the basis of combined symptoms (i.e. rectal bleeding, anal pain and swelling). Constipation was defined by the Rome III criteria. Risk factors were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight per cent of the patients developed anal symptoms. The most prevalent symptom was anal pain. Constipation was reported by 60.7% during the study period. Seven women (7.9%) suffered from faecal incontinence. The most prevalent diagnoses were haemorrhoidal thrombosis (immediately postpartum), haemorrhoidal prolapse (in the third trimester and immediately postpartum) and anal fissure (not episode related). The two independent risk factors for anal complaints were constipation, with a 6.3 odds ratio (95% CI 2.08-19.37), and a history of anal problems, with a 3.9 odds ratio (95% CI 1.2-13). The Bristol Stool Chart was shown to be a reliable indicator in pregnancy and postpartum as significant correlations were observed in all study periods.

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of pregnant women have anal symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum, especially haemorrhoidal complications and anal fissure. The most important risk factor is constipation. The prevention of constipation in pregnant women is therefore highly recommended.

Perineal trauma with vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of information regarding perineal injuries in women who achieve vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC).

AIMS

To ascertain the rate of severe perineal injuries in women achieving VBAC at a major tertiary obstetric hospital, and to determine if vaginal birth is more likely to be associated with perineal injuries in women with one previous caesarean section compared with nulliparous women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of women with singleton pregnancies at term who delivered vaginally between 2013 and 2016. We compared nulliparous women with women who had undergone one previous caesarean section. The primary outcome analysed was the rate of third and fourth degree tears in each group. Secondary outcomes were major post-partum haemorrhage and instrumental delivery.

RESULTS

Totals of 10 663 nulliparous women and 629 VBAC women achieved vaginal birth. Of the VBAC women, 418 achieved their first vaginal birth (first VBAC group). Overall, there was no significant difference in the rate of third and fourth degree tears in the VBAC group compared with the nulliparous group (6.0% vs 5.6%; P = 0.73). There was no significant increase in anal sphincter injuries in the first VBAC group compared with the nulliparous group (6.0% vs 7.4%; P = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

No overall difference in the rate of severe perineal injuries between VBAC women and nulliparous women who achieve vaginal birth was observed in this study.

Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury

Introduction and hypothesis

Our primary objective was to prospectively evaluate anorectal symptoms, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) in women who followed the recommended mode of subsequent delivery following index obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) using our unit’s standardised protocol. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the role of internal anal sphincter defects and also to compare outcomes in a subgroup of symptomatic women with normal anorectal physiology.

Methods

This is a prospective follow-up study of pregnant women with previous OASIs who were counselled regarding subsequent mode of delivery between January 2003 and December 2014. Assessment involved the St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS), anal manometry and EAUS at both antepartum and 3-month postpartum visits. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

Three hundred and fifty women attended the perineal clinic over the study period, of whom 122 met the inclusion criteria (99 vaginal delivery [VD], 23 caesarean section). No significant worsening of anorectal symptoms was observed following subsequent delivery in the VD group (p = 0.896), although a reduced squeeze pressure was observed at 3 months postpartum (p < 0.001). There were no new defects on EAUS in either group.

Conclusions

This study showed no significant worsening of bowel symptoms and sphincter integrity apart from lower squeeze pressures at 3 months postpartum in the VD group when our standardised protocol was used to recommend subsequent mode of delivery. In the absence of a randomised study, use of this protocol can aid clinicians in their decision-making.

Long-term anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury-does grade of tear matter?

BACKGROUND

Anal incontinence is a major concern following delivery with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS), and has been related to the degree of sphincter tear.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate whether women with a fourth-degree OASIS in the first delivery have an increased risk of long-term anal and fecal incontinence after a second delivery, and (2) to assess the impact of mode of second delivery on anal incontinence and related symptoms in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed secondary analyses of a national questionnaire study in all Danish women with an OASIS in their first delivery and 1 subsequent delivery, both deliveries in 1997 to 2005. The questionnaires were sent a minimum of 5 years since the second delivery. In Denmark, women with anal incontinence after a delivery with OASIS are recommended elective cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies. We performed uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 2008 patients had an OASIS, of whom 12.2% (n = 245) had a fourth-degree tear in the first delivery. The median follow-up time since the first delivery with OASIS was 11.6 years (IQR, 10.2-13.2 years) and since the second delivery 8.5 years (IQR, 7.1-10.1 years). Women with a fourth-degree sphincter injury in the first delivery were at higher risk for anal incontinence (58.8%, n = 144) as well as fecal incontinence (30.6%, n = 75) than patients with a third-degree injury in the first delivery (41.0%, n = 723, and 14.6%, n = 258, respectively). The differences between groups persisted after adjustment for important maternal, fetal, and obstetric characteristics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-3.02; P < 0.001 for anal incontinence; and aOR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.73-3.56; P < 0.001 for fecal incontinence). In subgroup analyses of patients with fourth-degree anal sphincter injury in the first delivery, the mode of second delivery was not associated with the risk of anal incontinence (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.41-1.84; P = 0.71) or fecal incontinence (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.65-2.52; P = 0.48). The effect of the mode of the second delivery did not differ between women with a fourth-degree OASIS and those with a third-degree injury with regard to both anal (P = 0.09) and fecal (P = 0.96) incontinence.

CONCLUSION

After a second delivery, women with a fourth-degree OASIS in the first delivery have a higher risk of long-term anal and fecal incontinence than women with a third-degree sphincter injury. Adjusted odds of long-term anal and fecal incontinence did not differ significantly by mode of second delivery. Women with a fourth-degree OASIS should be informed about the increased risk of long-term anal incontinence and advised that subsequent elective cesarean delivery is not protective.

Impact of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy on Quality of Life and Function After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

There is no standard of care for women sustaining an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS). We sought to determine whether pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) would improve the quality of life and function in women 12 weeks after OASIS.

METHODS

This institutional review board-approved randomized trial enrolled primiparous women 2 weeks after delivery complicated by OASIS. After informed consent, all subjects underwent vaginal electromyography and anorectal manometry and completed validated questionnaires; measures were repeated for all subjects at 12 weeks after delivery. The intervention arm completed 4 PFPT sessions. The primary outcome was a change in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life.

RESULTS

Three hundred four women were screened; 250 were excluded, and 54 were randomized. After four were lost to follow-up, analysis included 27 in the intervention arm and 23 in the control arm. Overall, mean age was 29.8 ± 4.7 years, and there were no demographic differences between groups.Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life domain scores showed improvement for both groups from baseline to 12 weeks for coping (P = 0.006) and depression (P = 0.009); however, there was no difference in domain scores between groups. For the secondary outcome of anorectal manometry, squeezing pressure improved for all subjects (P = 0.035) from baseline to 12 weeks. Vaginal EMG strength (microvolts) increased for all subjects in measures of rest average (P < 0.000), rapid peak (P = 0.006), and work average (P < 0.000), with no difference based on therapeutic arm.

CONCLUSIONS

All women showed improvements in quality of life and function at 12 weeks after delivery, regardless of treatment allocation. Further study is needed to determine whether PFPT provides a significant benefit to women having OASIS.

Anal Sphincter Injuries After Operative Vaginal Versus Spontaneous Delivery-Is There a Difference in Postpartum Symptoms?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in pelvic floor symptoms between women who had obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) after an operative vaginal delivery versus those who had OASIS after a spontaneous delivery.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of women who sustained OASIS. Women were evaluated at 1 week postpartum and again at 12 weeks; at both of these visits, they completed a battery of validated questionnaires including a visual analog scale for pain, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 depression inventory, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Urogenital Distress Inventory 6, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire 7.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-eight women with OASIS were included in this analysis (194 operative vaginal, 74 spontaneous). Ninety-one percent of those with operative vaginal delivery had a forceps-assisted delivery. After multivariate regression, operative OASIS was independently associated with greater Urogenital Distress Inventory 6 scores (P = 0.02), Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores (P = 0.04), and visual analog scale pain scores (P = 0.03) and higher rates of urgency urinary incontinence (P = 0.04), stress urinary incontinence (P = 0.02), and anal incontinence (P = 0.04) at 1 week postpartum. At 3 months postpartum, symptoms were no different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who sustain OASIS secondary to operative vaginal delivery report more bothersome urinary symptoms and higher rates of anal incontinence immediately postpartum as compared with women with OASIS secondary to spontaneous delivery. These differences may resolve by 3 months postpartum.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perineal Lacerations in a Diverse Urban Healthcare System

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was o determine whether variations exist between races/ethnicities in perineal laceration at first vaginal delivery.

METHODS

We assessed first vaginal deliveries greater than 35 weeks gestation, for a four-year period, in our diverse urban healthcare system. Predictor variable was race/ethnicity with outcome variable of none, first-, second-, third-, or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Race and ethnicity were self-reported and combined into one variable to facilitate analysis. We also collected data on other known risk factors for laceration to adjust our analysis accordingly.

RESULTS

A total of 1179 charts met criteria. When comparing none, first-, or second-degree lacerations versus third or fourth degrees (obstetric anal sphincter injuries) race was not a significant factor. We also compared lacerations among the following three groups: none or first degree versus second degree versus obstetric anal sphincter injuries. In this case, Asian and white women were associated with an increasing trend of perineal lacerations as degree of severity increased (P < 0.0001), whereas black and Latina women were associated with a decreasing trend as severity increased (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for other significant variables, race was still significant (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

With an urban diverse population, our study demonstrates an association between race/ethnicity and perineal lacerations. As degree of laceration increased, Asian and white women were noted to have more lacerations, and black and Latina women were noted to have fewer. Because perineal lacerations pose a significant risk to future pelvic floor health, the associated factors identified in this study may prove useful in counseling patients on future risk or in identifying the actual risk in underrepresented populations.

Functional and quality of life outcomes following obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): does the grade of injury affect outcomes?

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to compare functional and quality of life data in patients with increasing grades of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) presenting to a tertiary colorectal pelvic floor clinic within 24 months of delivery.

Methods

Prospective data were collected from the patients for the period 2009–2016 and included data on functional outcomes and motor anorectal manometry parameters. The instruments used for the evaluation of functional outcomes were the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire, the Wexner Incontinence Score, Short Form 36, and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. OASI grade of injury was based on the postdelivery endoanal ultrasound scan. Data from patients with a grade 3a, 3b, 3c or 4 OASI were compared using one-way ANOVA for parametric data and the Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric data overall and for separate time periods (3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 months).

Results

Functional patient data were available in 177 patients: 29 with grade 3a, 55 with grade 3b, 77 with grade 3c and 16 with grade 4 OASI. There was no discernible trend in worsening function with increasing severity of OASI overall, nor for the specified time periods of 3–6 months 58 patients), 6–12 months (85 patients) or 12–24 months (18 patients).

Conclusions

Our series demonstrated no significant differences in functional outcomes or quality of life in patients with different OASI grades. Longer-term follow-up is required to ascertain any later functional differences which may become apparent with time.

Postpartum two- and three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of anal sphincter complex in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of two- (2D) and three- (3D) dimensional transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and 3D endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) with the gold standard 3D endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) in detecting residual defects after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

METHODS

External (EAS) and internal (IAS) anal sphincters were evaluated by the four ultrasound modalities in women with repaired OASIS. 2D-TPUS was evaluated in real-time, whereas 3D-TPUS, 3D-EVUS and 3D-EAUS volumes were evaluated offline by six blinded readers. The presence/absence of any tear in EAS or IAS was recorded and defects were scored according to the Starck system. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated, using 3D-EAUS as reference standard. Inter- and intraobserver analyses were performed for all 3D imaging modalities. Association between patients' symptoms (Wexner score) and ultrasound findings (Starck score) was calculated.

RESULTS

Images from 55 patients were analyzed. Compared with findings on 3D-EAUS, the agreement for EAS evaluation was poor for 3D-EVUS (κ = 0.01), fair for 2D-TPUS (κ = 0.30) and good for 3D-TPUS (κ = 0.73). The agreement for IAS evaluation was moderate for both 3D-EVUS (κ = 0.41) and 2D-TPUS (κ = 0.52) and good for 3D-TPUS (κ = 0.66). Good intraobserver (3D-EAUS, κ = 0.73; 3D-TPUS, κ = 0.78) and interobserver (3D-EAUS, κ = 0.68; 3D-TPUS, κ = 0.60) agreement was reported. Significant association between Starck and Wexner scores was found only for 3D-EAUS (Spearman's rho = 0.277, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

2D-TPUS and 3D-EVUS are not accurate modalities for the assessment of anal sphincters after repair of OASIS. 3D-TPUS shows good agreement with the gold standard 3D-EAUS and a high sensitivity in detecting residual defects. It, thus, has potential as a screening tool after primary repair of OASIS. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population

BACKGROUND

Perineal lacerations are common at the time of vaginal delivery and may predispose patients to long-term pelvic floor disorders, such as urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries, which are the most severe form of perineal lacerations, result in disruption of the anal sphincter and, in some cases, the rectal mucosa during vaginal delivery. Long-term morbidity, including pain, pelvic floor disorders, fecal incontinence, and predisposition to recurrent injury at subsequent delivery may result. Despite several studies that have reported risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries, no accurate risk prediction models have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors and develop prediction models for perineal lacerations and obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a nested case control study within a retrospective cohort of consecutive term vaginal deliveries at 1 tertiary care facility from 2004-2008. Cases were patients with any perineal laceration that had been sustained during vaginal delivery; control subjects had no lacerations of any severity. Secondary analyses investigated obstetric anal sphincter injury (3rd- to 4(th)-degree laceration) vs no obstetric anal sphincter injury (0 to 2(nd)-degree laceration). Baseline characteristics were compared between groups with the use of the chi-square and Student t test. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the use of multivariable logistic regression. Prediction models were created and model performance was estimated with receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were validated internally with the use of the bootstrap method to correct for bias within the model.

RESULTS

Of the 5569 term vaginal deliveries that were recorded during the study period, complete laceration data were available in 5524 deliveries. There were 3382 perineal lacerations and 249 (4.5%) obstetric anal sphincter injuries. After adjusted analysis, significant predictors for laceration included nulliparity, non-black race, longer second stage, nonsmoking status, higher infant birthweight, and operative delivery. Private health insurance, labor induction, pushing duration, and regional anesthesia were not statistically significant in adjusted analyses. Significant risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury were similar to predictors for any laceration; nulliparity and operative vaginal delivery had the highest predictive value. Area under the curve for the predictive ability of the models was 0.70 for overall perineal laceration, and 0.83 for obstetric anal sphincter injury. When limited to primiparous patients, 1996 term vaginal deliveries were recorded. One hundred ninety-two women sustained an obstetric anal sphincter injury; 1796 women did not. After adjusted analysis, significant predictors for laceration included non-black race, age, obesity, and nonsmoking status. In secondary analyses, significant predictors for obstetric anal sphincter injury included non-black race, nonsmoking status, longer duration of pushing, operative vaginal delivery, and infant birthweight. Area under the curve for the predictive ability of the models was 0.60 for any laceration and 0.77 for obstetric anal sphincter injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant risk factors for sustaining any laceration and obstetric anal sphincter injury during vaginal deliveries were identified. These results will help identify clinically at-risk patients and assist providers in counseling patients about modifications to decrease these risks.

Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment

Fecal incontinence (FI) is a chronic and debilitating condition that carries a significant health, economic, and social burden. FI has a considerable psychosocial and financial impact on patients and their families. A variety of treatment modalities are available for FI including behavioral and dietary modifications, pharmacotherapy, pelvic floor physical therapy, bulking agents, anal sphincteroplasty, sacral nerve stimulation, artificial sphincters, magnetic sphincters, posterior anal sling, and colostomy.

Early pelvic floor muscle training after obstetrical anal sphincter injuries for the reduction of anal incontinence

OBJECTIVES

Between 0.5 and 5% of vaginal deliveries involve obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Thirty to forty percent of patients with OASIS will suffer from anal incontinence in the subacute postpartum period. The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of early pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) combined with standard rehabilitation on anal incontinence after vaginal deliveries complicated by OASIS.

STUDY DESIGN

The present work was a retrospective quantitative study performed in a tertiary-level maternity hospital. Women with 3rd or 4th degree obstetric tears were included. Women who gave birth between January 1st, 2011 and December 31st, 2012 underwent standard pelvic-perineal rehabilitation within 6-8 weeks postpartum. Women who gave birth between January 1st, 2013 and July 1st, 2014 had early rehabilitation (within 30 days after delivery) followed by the same standard rehabilitation received by the other group. Rehabilitation was performed by physiotherapists specialized in perineology. No electrostimulation was done in early rehabilitation. An in-house-validated modification of the Jorge and Wexner questionnaire was sent by mail to the patients to assess symptoms. The main judgment criterion was anal incontinence to gas, loose stools and/or solid stool.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty patients were diagnosed with OASIS. Nineteen women (8.3%) were lost to follow-up. The intention-to-treat analysis included 211 patients, 109 of whom underwent standard rehabilitation and 102 early rehabilitation plus standard rehabilitation. The two groups were comparable in terms of parity, birth weight, assisted delivery, epidural anesthesia and rates of mediolateral episiotomy. Multivariate analyses adjusted for type of perineal lesion were performed. Early rehabilitation significantly reduced gas leakage: OR 0.51 [0.29-0.90] (p=0.02), liquid stool leakage: OR 0.22 [0.08-0.58] (p=0.02) and urinary stress incontinence: OR 0.43 [0.24-0.77] (p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend early (during the first month postpartum) PFMT after vaginal deliveries associated with OASIS. Rehabilitation should be carried out by a physiotherapist specialized in perineology in order to prevent medium-term functional consequences. A longer follow-up may be necessary to confirm the stability of results.

[Predictive factors of 2-month postpartum anal incontinence among patients with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury]

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence of short-term postpartum anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study including every patient with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury between January 2006 and December 2012 in one tertiary maternity unit. Patients were interviewed and examined at 2-month postpartum. Anal incontinence was defined by the presence of at least one of the following symptoms: flatus incontinence, faecal incontinence and faecal urgency.

RESULTS

Among 17,110 patients who delivered vaginally during period study, 134 (0.8%) presented an anal sphincter injury. Postpartum obstetrical data were available for 110 of them. Among those patients, 50 women (45.5%) had at least one symptom of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum and 8 (7.3%) had faecal incontinence. Only maternal age and second stage duration were significantly associated with anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury. The degree of sphincter damage at delivery (IIIa, b, c, IV) was not associated with the risk of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age and second stage duration were the only risk factor for anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury in this study. High prevalence of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is observed no matter what is the degree of anal sphincter damage. Our results highlight the importance to diagnose all obstetrical anal sphincter injuries whatever the degree of damage.

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are the leading cause of anal incontinence in women. Modification of various risk factors and anatomical considerations have been reported to reduce the rate of OASI.

METHODS

A PubMed search (1989-2014) of studies and systematic reviews on risk factors for OASI.

RESULTS

Perineal distension (stretching) of 170 % in the transverse direction and 40 % in the vertical direction occurs at crowning, leading to significant differences (15-30°) between episiotomy incision angles and suture angles. Episiotomies incised at 60° achieve suture angles of 43-50°; those incised at 40° result in a suture angle of 22°. Episiotomies with suture angles too acute (<30°) and too lateral (>60°) are associated with an increased risk of OASI. Suture angles of 40-60° are in the safe zone. Clinicians are poor at correctly estimating episiotomy angles on paper and in patients. Sutured episiotomies originating 10 mm away from the midline are associated with a lower rate of OASIs. Compared to spontaneous tears, episiotomies appear to be associated with a reduction in OASI risk by 40-50 %, whereas shorter perineal lengths, perineal oedema and instrumental deliveries are associated with a higher risk. Instrumental deliveries with mediolateral episiotomies are associated with a significantly lower OASI risk. Other preventative measures include warm perineal compresses and controlled delivery of the head.

CONCLUSIONS

Relieving pressure on the central posterior perineum by an episiotomy and/or controlled delivery of the head should be important considerations in reducing the risk of OASI. Episiotomies should be performed 60° from the midline. Prospective studies should evaluate elective episiotomies in women with a short perineal length and application of standardised digital perineal support.