Practice patterns regarding management of rectovaginal fistulae: a multicenter review from the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network

Rectovaginal Fistula Repair Following Vaginoplasty in Transgender Females: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques

Background: Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) remains a complex complication following gender-affirming vaginoplasty. This review aims to evaluate RVF repair techniques and outcomes following vaginoplasty. Methods: A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to RVF repair following vaginoplasty. Study characteristics, operative details, and demographics were collected. Outcomes included RVF repair method, recurrence rate, and complications. Results: Among 282 screened citations, 17 articles representing 41 patients were included. Rectovaginal fistula repair methods identified included 4 conservative management approaches (n = 12 patients), primary closure with or without fistulectomy and ostomy (n = 22), 10 reconstructive surgical techniques (n = 18). The most common reconstructive techniques were V-Y full-thickness advancement with rectal flap (n = 5) and infragluteal fasciocutaneous flap (n = 4). Median time to recurrence was 6 months (interquartile range 7.5). Reported RVF repair complications included RVF recurrence (n = 5, 14.7%) and wound complication or dehiscence (n = 2, 5.88%). Three cases of RVF recurred after primary closure with or without fistulectomy and ostomy, while 2 cases of recurrence followed reconstruction. Conclusion: There remains a high level of variability in the approach to RVF repair following vaginoplasty. Reconstructive surgical techniques may be a more optimal solution without necessitating ostomies, but this decision must be considered in the context of RVF location, individual patient expectations, and clinical presentation.

Surgical Intervention is Effective for the Treatment of Crohn's related Rectovaginal Fistulas: Experience From A Tertiary Inflammatory Bowel Disease Practice

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rectovaginal fistula occurs in up to 10-20% of women with Crohn's disease, significantly affecting their quality of life. We sought to determine outcomes of single and repeat operative interventions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all adult patients with a Crohn's related rectovaginal fistula who underwent an operation between 1995 to 2021 was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, Crohn's related medical treatment, surgical intervention, postoperative outcomes, and fistula outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients underwent 360 operations; mean age was 42.8 (+/-13.2) years. Thirty-four (20.7%) patients were current and 58 (35.4%) former smokers. The most commonly performed procedure was a local approach (n=160, 44.5%) using fibrin glue, fistulotomy/fistulectomy or seton placement, followed by a transvaginal/transanal approach (n=113, 31.4%) with an advancement flap repair (including Martius advancement flap) and episoproctotomy, a transabdominal approach (n=98, 27.2%) including proctectomy or redo anastomosis and finally gracilis muscle interposition (n=8, 2.2%). The median number of operative interventions per patient was 2 (1.0-3.0) procedures. The overall fistula healing rate per patient was 71.7% (n=119) at a median follow-up of 5.5 (1.2-9.8) years. Factors that impaired healing included former smoking (OR 0.52 95%, CI 0.31 - 0.87, p=0.014) and seton insertion (OR 0.42 95%, CI 0.21-0.83, p=0.012).

CONCLUSION

Over two-thirds of Crohn's related rectovaginal fistulas can achieve closure with multiple surgical interventions. Smoking and seton usage negatively impact healing rates and should be avoided.

A systematic review of the patient burden of Crohn’s disease-related rectovaginal and anovaginal fistulas

Background

Crohn’s disease (CD)-related rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) and anovaginal fistulas (AVFs) are rare, debilitating conditions that present a substantial disease and treatment burden for women. This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the burden of Crohn’s-related RVF and AVF, summarizing evidence from observational studies and highlighting knowledge gaps.

Methods

This SLR identified articles in PubMed and Embase that provide data and insight into the patient experience and disease burden of Crohn’s-related RVF and AVF. Two trained reviewers used pre-specified eligibility criteria to identify studies for inclusion and evaluate risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for observational studies.

Results

Of the 582 records identified, 316 full-text articles were assessed, and 16 studies met a priori eligibility criteria and were included. Few epidemiology studies were identified, with one study estimating the prevalence of RVF to be 2.3% in females with Crohn’s disease. Seven of 12 treatment pattern studies reported that patients had or required additional procedures before and/or after the intervention of interest, demonstrating a substantial treatment burden. Seven of 11 studies assessing clinical outcomes reported fistula healing rates between 50 and 75%, with varying estimates based on population and intervention.

Conclusions

This SLR reports the high disease and treatment burden of Crohn’s-related RVF and AVF and identifies multiple evidence gaps in this field. The literature lacks robust, generalizable data, and demonstrates a compelling need for substantial, novel research into these rare and debilitating sequelae of CD.

Registration The PROSPERO registration number for the protocol for this systematic literature review is CRD42020177732.

Surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula-predictors of outcome and effects on quality of life

PURPOSE

To determine the results after rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair and find predictors of outcome. Primary objective was fistula healing. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHOD

An observational study of 55 women who underwent RVF repair including both local procedures and tissue transposition 2003-2018 was performed. Baseline patient and fistula characteristics were registered, combined with a prospective HRQoL follow-up and a general questionnaire describing fistula symptoms.

RESULTS

Healing rate after index surgery was 25.5% (n = 14) but the final healing rate was 67.3% (n = 37). Comparing the etiologies, traumatic fistulas (iatrogenic and obstetric) had the highest healing rates after index surgery (n = 11, 45.9%) and after repeated operations at final follow-up (n = 22, 91.7%) compared with fistulas of inflammatory fistulas (Crohn's disease, cryptoglandular infection, and anastomotic leakage) that had inferior healing rates after both index surgery (n = 7, 7.1%) and at final follow-up (n = 13, 46.4%). Fistulas of the category others (radiation damage and unknown etiology) included a small amount of patients with intermediate results at both index surgery (n = 1, 33.3%) and healing rate at last follow-up (n = 2, 66.7%). The differences were statistically significant for both index surgery (p = 0.004) and at final follow-up (p = 0.001). Unhealed patients scored lower than both healed patients and the normal population in 6/8 Rand-36 domains, but the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Most traumatic rectovaginal fistulas closed after repeated surgery whereas inflammatory fistulas had a poor prognosis. Low healing rates after local repairs suggest that tissue transfer might be indicated more early in the treatment process. Unhealed fistulas were associated with reduced quality of life. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov No. NCT05006586.

Perioperative Outcomes of Rectovaginal Fistula Repair Based on Surgical Approach: A National Contemporary Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of transvaginal/perineal and abdominal approaches to rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair using a national multicenter cohort.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was utilized to identify women undergoing RVF repair from 2005 to 2016. Emergent cases and those with concomitant bowel diversion were excluded. Baseline patient demographics, procedure characteristics, 30-day postoperative complications, return to the operating room, and readmission were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were compared across surgical approach. Multivariable logistic regression models identified preoperative characteristics independently associated with postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 2288 women underwent RVF repair: 1560 (68.2%) via transvaginal/perineal approach and 728 (31.8%) via abdominal approach. Patients undergoing transvaginal/perineal repair were significantly younger (median age, 46 years vs 63 years), with lower American Society for Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores, and less frequency of diabetes mellitus, dyspnea, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, disseminated cancer, and bleeding disorders (all P < 0.01). Those undergoing abdominal repair had higher rates of major complications (25.8% vs 8.7%), minor complications (13.5% vs 6.3%), and readmission (13.2% vs 7.8%). On multivariable analyses, ASA Class 3/4, disseminated cancer, and hematocrit <30% (P < 0.01) were associated with major complications in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing RVF repair via abdominal approach were older with more comorbidities and had higher postoperative complications rates, likely secondary to underlying differences in the treated populations. Irrespective of surgical approach, ASA class, disseminated cancer, and preoperative anemia were associated with higher postoperative morbidity. This may enhance preoperative counseling and allow for careful patient selection.

Rectovaginal Fistulas Secondary to Obstetrical Injury

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF), defined as any abnormal connection between the rectum and the vagina, is a complex and debilitating condition. RVF can occur for a variety of reasons, but frequently develops following obstetric injury. Patients with suspected RVF require thorough evaluation, including history and physical examination, imaging, and objective evaluation of the anal sphincter complex. Prior to attempting repair, sepsis must be controlled and the tract allowed to mature over a period of 3 to 6 months. All repair techniques involve reestablishing a healthy, well-vascularized rectovaginal septum, either through reconstruction with local tissue or tissue transfer via a pedicled flap. The selection of a specific repair technique is determined by the level of the fistula tract and the status of the anal sphincter. Despite best efforts, recurrence is common and should be discussed with patients prior to repair. As the ultimate goal of RVF repair is to minimize symptoms and maximize quality of life, patients should help to direct their own care based on the risks and benefits of available treatment options.

Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Iatrogenic recto-urogenital fistulae are refractory complications that rarely heal without surgical intervention. The ongoing local infection causes pain, discomfort and substantially impacts quality of life. Surgical repair requires adequate exposure and space to fill with healthy tissue, which is a major challenge in pelvic redo surgery. An abdominal approach to repair the fistula is associated with major morbidity and often fails to expose the deep pelvis. In our experience a novel transperineal minimally invasive approach a utilizing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) technique could offer improved results.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

In the present study, three cases of patients with recto-urogenital fistulae after pelvic surgery are described. Two patients were diagnosed with a rectovesical fistula and one patient with a rectovaginal fistula. In all three cases, a minimally invasive perineal approach, using a SILS port, was used to perform surgical repair. The closure of the fistulae involved: a separate repair of the urethra/bladder or vaginal defect and the rectal defect, followed by interposition of vascularized tissue by either a pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap or omentoplasty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study is the first to report on a minimally invasive perineal approach, utilizing a SILS technique for recto-urogenital fistulae repair after previous pelvic surgery. The current approach improves exposure, creates surgical space, optimizes view and allows the interposition of vascularized tissue, without causing substantial blood loss and avoiding major abdominal surgery.

Minimally invasive treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistula: a transanal endoscopic surgery study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) is extremely difficult. No standard surgical procedure is accepted worldwide. The aim of this article was to evaluate a minimally invasive procedure for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistula.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas (located in the lower or middle one-third of the vaginal wall) at our center between August 2016 and October 2018. The anal approach was adopted for 12 patients: 6 patients were treated directly by rectal mucosal advancement flap (RMAF) with transanal endoscopic surgery (TES), while the other 6 patients underwent initial TES exploration followed by RMAF procedure under direct vision. The vaginal approach was adopted for 5 patients: 3 patients were treated under TES directly and the other 2 were treated under direct vision after initial TES exploration. A total of 9 (52.94%) patients received diverting ileostomy-5 anal approach patients and 4 vaginal approach patients.

RESULTS

Median age of the patients was 46 years (range 10-76 years), and median BMI was 21.9 (range 17.9-28.1). Median operative time was 75 min (range 60-120 min), and median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 6-15 days). Recurrence was seen in 3/12 anal approach patients vs. 0/5 vaginal approach patients. Both the median preoperative and the median postoperative Wexner score were 0 (range 0-2). The median follow-up time was 8 months (range 2-24). No severe complications occurred in any patient.

CONCLUSION

The TES procedure for the treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas avoids any incision of the abdomen and perineal area and appears to be a safe and feasible procedure. This minimally invasive technique is still evolving and is likely to gain wide acceptance in the near future.

Do the Surgical Outcomes of Rectovaginal Fistula Repairs Differ for Obstetric and Nonobstetric Fistulas? A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Rectovaginal fistulas can occur from both obstetric and nonobstetric (eg, inflammatory bowel disease, iatrogenic, or traumatic) etiologies. Current data on factors contributing to rectovaginal repair success or failure are limited, making adequate patient counseling difficult. Our objective was to compare outcomes of transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair performed in a single referral center on women with obstetric and nonobstetric causes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of women who had a transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair performed by a urogynecologist at the University of Michigan from 2005 to 2015. Data were obtained by chart review and included demographics, medical comorbidities, fistula etiology, history of a prior fistula repair, failure of current repair, time to failure, and operative details. Repair failure was defined as fistula symptoms with presence of recurrent fistula on exam or imaging in the postoperative follow-up period. Comparisons between the obstetric and nonobstetric cohorts were performed using χ, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Relative risks were calculated to identify predictors of failure.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight women were included-53 obstetric and 35 nonobstetric fistulas. The overall fistula repair failure rate was 22.7% (n = 20). Median follow-up was 157.0 days (range, 47.5-402.0). Of all the factors, only nonobstetric etiology was significantly associated with an increased risk of repair failure (relative risk, 3.53 [range, 1.50-8.32]; P = 0.004.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonobstetric rectovaginal fistulas have a nearly 4-fold increased risk of repair failure compared with obstetric fistulas. Our results will help surgeons adequately counsel patients on potential outcomes of surgical repair of obstetric versus nonobstetric rectovaginal fistulas.

Outcomes of Rectovaginal Fistula Repair

OBJECTIVES

Rectovaginal fistulae (RVF) often represent surgical challenges, and treatment must be individualized. We describe outcomes after primary surgical repair stratified by fistula etiology and surgical approach.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent surgical management of RVF at a tertiary care center between July 1, 2001 and December 31, 2013. Cases were stratified according to the following etiology: cancer (RVF-C), inflammatory bowel disease or infectious (RVF-I), and other (RVF-O). Patients with prior surgical treatment of RVF were excluded. Surgical approaches included local (seton, plug), transvaginal or endorectal, abdominal, diversion alone, or definitive (completion proctocolectomy with permanent colostomy or pelvic exenteration). Recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between subgroups were evaluated based on fitting Cox proportional hazards models. Censoring occurred at last relevant clinical follow-up. Factors contributing to recurrence-free survival were evaluated including age, body mass index, smoking status, fistula etiology, ileostomy, and surgical approach.

RESULTS

During the study period, 107 women underwent surgical repair of RVF. The most common fistula etiology was RVF-I (54.2%), followed by RVF-O (23.4%), and RVF-C (22.4%). Ninety-four women underwent fistula repair by the local (29.9%), transvaginal/endorectal (25.2%), abdominal approach (19.6%), or diversion alone (13.1%), whereas 13 underwent definitive surgery (12.2%). Recurrence-free survival was significantly different depending on surgical approach (P < 0.001), but not etiology (P = 0.71). Recurrence-free survival (95% confidence interval) at 1 year after surgery was 35.2% (21.8%-56.9%) for the local approach, 55.6% (37.0%-83.3%) for the transvaginal or endorectal approach, 95% (85.9%-100%) for the abdominal approach, and 33.3% (15%-74.2%) for those with diversion only.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence rates after RVF repair are high and did not differ by fistula etiology. Abdominal repair of RVF had significantly fewer recurrences.

Successful repair of recurrent rectovaginal fistula by stratified suture using transanal endoscopic microsurgery: A CARE-compliant case report

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) are abnormal connections between the rectum and vagina. Although many surgical approaches to correct them have been attempted, management of RVFs still remains a challenge, especially for recurrent RVFs.

METHODS

In the present study, we report a case in a 22-year-old female with a chief complaint of obvious passages of flatus or stool through the vagina for 10 years. She had suffered a vaginal trauma from a violent accident 10 years prior, and gradually noticed the uncontrollable passage of gas or feces from the vagina 2 weeks later.The patient underwent a transvaginal direct repair surgery at local hospital 9 years ago, but the symptoms recurred 1 month after the surgery. After 2-years monitoring, the patient underwent another transvaginal repair surgery (fistulectomy followed by direct suture) at another hospital, but the fistula recurred again. We initially performed a temporary protective transversostomy upon admission. After 8-months of observation, a methylene blue test was conducted and the diagnosis of recurrent RVF was confirmed. Subsequently, we performed a successful repair by stratified suture using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). The scar tissue on the posterior wall of the vagina and the anterior wall of the rectum were meticulously excised until the margin of the excisional line showed healthy tissue. In addition, the fistulous tract was completely removed. The edges of the fistula on the posterior wall of the vagina were closed by simple continuous suturing, and the rectal anterior wall was sutured in the same manner.

RESULTS

During a 1-year follow-up period, the fistulae were not recurrent and no complication such as incontinences or rectal bleeding were found. The latest Wexner score was 3.

CONCLUSION

We present a case of successful treatment with stratified suture using TEM throughout the procedure. We strongly recommend this efficient and minimally invasive procedure for recurrent RVFs.