A Prospective Observational Study of the Classification of the Perineum and Evaluation of Perineal Repair at the Time of Posterior Colporrhaphy

Barbed Versus Nonbarbed Suture for Posterior Colporrhaphy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IMPORTANCE

There is limited literature or even consensus on the suture material used for posterior vaginal repairs.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare outcomes of barbed versus nonbarbed delayed absorbable suture used for posterior colporrhaphy.

STUDY DESIGN

This study conducted a randomized controlled trial of 72 women undergoing posterior repair using standardized technique-concurrent procedures permitted with barbed (n = 36) or nonbarbed (n = 36) suture. Standardized examinations, validated questionnaires, and a visual analog scale (VAS) were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 months, and a telephone interview was conducted at 6 months. The primary outcome was posterior compartment pain at 6 weeks, measured by a VAS.

RESULTS

Seventy-two women enrolled, with follow-up rates 6 weeks (100%), 6 months (90.3%), and 12 months (73.6%). Demographics were similar between groups. A VAS with movement was not different between groups at 6 weeks. The odds of experiencing vaginal pain, having myofascial pain on examination, or being sexually active postoperatively were not different between the groups. There were no differences in the length of posterior colporrhaphy, surgical times, or hospital length of stay between the groups. Suture passes were lower in the nonbarbed group (median, 4 vs 7; P = <0.001), and suture burden was higher in the nonbarbed group (median, 26.9 vs 10.5 cm; P = <0.001). There was overall improvement in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form 20 prolapse and colorectal subscores but no differences between groups. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form 12 scores improved, and dyspareunia decreased at 6 and 12 months in both groups. In addition, there were few anatomic recurrences at 6 weeks (0%) and 12 months (3.4%) and few adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no differences in primary or secondary outcomes; however, both suture types resulted in clinical improvements in quality-of-life measures and sexual function.

One-year follow-up after standardized perineal reconstruction in women with deficient perineum after vaginal delivery

INTRODUCTION

Perineal tears are common after childbirth and, if not surgically repaired, they may result in a deficient perineum that can cause symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. Perineal reconstruction aims to restore the perineal body and increase the support of the pelvic floor. The objective of the present study was to estimate symptom reduction after perineal reconstruction in patients with deficient perineum after vaginal delivery and to compare outcomes between participants with or without concomitant levator ani muscle deficiency.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Participants presenting at the Karolinska Pelvic Floor Center with symptoms of deficient perineum at least 1 year after vaginal birth were invited to the study. Inclusion criteria were a visible perineal scar and confirmed anatomic defect. Levator ani defects were assessed using the Levator Ani Deficiency score. A perineal reconstruction was performed in a standardized way. Subjective symptoms were evaluated using the validated "Karolinska Symptoms After Perineal Tear Inventory" at baseline and 1-year follow-up. A score difference in the symptom of an acquired sensation of a wide vagina was the primary outcome. Results were stratified by the presence or absence of a levator ani deficiency.

RESULTS

A perineal reconstruction was performed in 131 patients and 128 patients completed the Karolinska Symptoms After Perineal Tear Inventory at baseline and 119 at follow-up. Median age was 36.1 (interquartile range [IQR] 7.9), median body mass index 22.3 (IQR 5.1) and a median of two vaginal deliveries. Fifty-four women (41.2%) had a levator ani deficiency. The mean score reduction for the item "Do you feel that your vagina is too wide/loose?" was -1.56 (SD 0.96; P < 0.001) from a mean score of 2.75 (maximum 3) at baseline. The mean total score reduction was -9.1 points (SD 5.3; P < 0.001) from a mean score of 18.4 (maximum 33) points at baseline. There were no significant differences between groups when stratifying by levator ani deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that perineal reconstructive surgery significantly decreases symptoms of deficient perineum after vaginal delivery. A concomitant levator ani defect does not affect the symptom reduction of an acquired sensation of a wide vagina or the total score reduction after surgery.

An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders

AIMS

The terminology of obstetric pelvic floor disorders should be defined and reported as part of a wider clinically oriented consensus.

METHODS

This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Continence Society (ICS) and the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). The process was supported by external referees. Appropriate clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give coding to definitions. An extensive process of 12 main rounds of internal and 2 rounds of external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by consensus.

RESULTS

A terminology report for obstetric pelvic floor disorders, encompassing 357 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it usable by different specialty groups and disciplines involved in the study and management of pregnancy, childbirth and female pelvic floor disorders. Clinical assessment, investigations, diagnosis, conservative and surgical treatments are major components. Illustrations have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts, in use in the literature and offering further research potential but requiring further validation, have been included as an Appendix. As with similar reports, interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to maintain relevance of the document and ensure it remains as widely applicable as possible.

CONCLUSION

A consensus-based Terminology Report for obstetric pelvic floor disorders has been produced to support clinical practice and research.

Comparison of the Perineal Body Between Chinese Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Women With Normal Support by Magnetic Resonance Imaging With 3-Dimensional Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether the perineal body (PB) is different between women with and without prolapse and to analyze its association with prolapse.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study was performed in a tertiary-level urology department and included patients with stage II-IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and normal controls with all points 1 cm or more above the hymen. The patients underwent supine midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at rest and during the maximum Valsalva maneuver. Perineal mobility and PB length, height, perimeter, and area were measured; in addition, the genital hiatus and PB were measured according to the definition of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Univariate associations of POP with characteristics were assessed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the t test for continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Seventy-two controls and 130 patients were analyzed. The PB length, height, and area measurements were significantly lower in the POP group. The perineal mobility in different directions was significantly higher in the POP group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PB area and perineal mobility in the ventral-dorsal and cranio-caudal directions were associated with POP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that a smaller PB area and greater dorsal or caudal mobility are associated with prolapse.

Joint Report on Terminology for Surgical Procedures to Treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common, but standardization of surgical terms is needed to improve the quality of investigation and clinical care around these procedures. The American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecologic Association convened a joint writing group consisting of 5 designees from each society to standardize terminology around common surgical terms in POP repair including the following: sacrocolpopexy (including sacral colpoperineopexy), sacrocervicopexy, uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous ligament fixation, iliococcygeus fixation, uterine preservation prolapse procedures or hysteropexy (including sacrohysteropexy, uterosacral hysteropexy, sacrospinous hysteropexy, anterior abdominal wall hysteropexy, Manchester procedure), anterior prolapse procedures (including anterior vaginal repair, anterior vaginal repair with graft, and paravaginal repair), posterior prolapse procedures (including posterior vaginal repair, posterior vaginal repair with graft, levator plication, and perineal repair), and obliterative prolapse repairs (including colpocleisis with hysterectomy, colpocleisis without hysterectomy, and colpocleisis of the vaginal vault). Each of these terms is clearly defined in this document including the required steps of the procedure, surgical variations, and recommendations for procedural terminology.

Perioperative changes in superficial pelvic organ prolapse quantification system measurements after prolapse surgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the values of perineal body (PB) and genital hiatus (GH) before and after posterior repair. We also evaluated the introital surface area (ISA)-a sum of transverse and longitudinal GH measurements.

METHODS

This secondary analysis of a prospective case series included 94 women undergoing posterior vaginal prolapse surgery at a consultant urogynecology clinic between October 3, 2011, and October 2, 2014. Patients were examined in clinic using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system with Valsalva maneuver, and in theatre pre- and postoperatively with traction.

RESULTS

Immediately postoperatively, a statistically significant change (all P<0.001) was noted for GH (mean difference -0.59 cm), PB (-0.56 cm), and ISA (-0.87 cm) compared with preoperative measurement. This effect was maintained for GH (-0.42 cm) and PB (-0.40 cm) at 2 months' follow-up (both P<0.001), and for PB alone (-0.43 cm; P=0.04) at 8 months. ISA had a moderate correlation with GH (r=0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior repair significantly improved PB length at months 2 and 8, and GH length at month 2. ISA did not correlate with prolapse stage. Changes in GH were not maintained beyond postoperative month 2.