Opioid Consumption After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study Using a Text-Messaging Survey Tool

High inpatient-opioid consumption predicts extended length of hospital stay in patients undergoing spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

OBJECTIVES

Opioids are common medications used following spine surgery. However, few studies have assessed the impact of increased inpatient-opioid consumption on outcomes following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of increased inpatient-opioid consumption on hospital length of stay (LOS) following PSF for AIS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Premier Healthcare Database (2016-2017). Adolescent patients (11-17 years old) who underwent PSF for AIS, identified using ICD-10-CM coding, were stratified by inpatient MME (morphine milligram equivalent) consumption into Low (< 25th percentile for the cohort), Medium (25-75th percentile), and High (> 75th percentile) cohorts. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative procedures, perioperative adverse events (AEs), length of hospital stay (LOS), non-routine discharge rates, cost of admission, and 30-day readmission rates were assessed. A logistic multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the association between inpatient MME consumption and extended LOS.

RESULTS

Of the 1042 study patients, 260 (24.9%) had Low-MME consumption, 523 (50.2%) had Medium-MME consumption, and 259 (24.9%) had High-MME consumption. A greater proportion of patients in the High cohort identified as non-Hispanic white (Low: 46.5% vs Medium: 61.4% vs High: 65.3%, p < 0.001), while the proportion of patients reporting any comorbidity did not vary across the cohorts (p = 0.940). The number of post-operative AEs experienced also did not vary across the cohorts (p = 0.629). A greater proportion of patients in the High cohort had an extended LOS (Low: 6.5% vs Medium: 8.6% vs High: 19.7%, p < 0.001), while a greater proportion of patients in the Low cohort had an increased cost of admission (Low: 33.1% vs Medium: 20.3% vs High: 26.6%, p < 0.001). The High cohort had increased 30-day readmission rates relative to the Low and Medium cohorts (Low: 0.8% vs Medium: 0.2% vs High: 1.5%, p = 0.049). Non-routine discharge rates did not vary among the cohorts (p = 0.441). On multivariate analysis, High-MME consumption was significantly associated with extended LOS, while Medium-MME consumption was not [Medium: aOR: 1.48, CI (0.83, 2.74), p = 0.193; High: aOR: 4.43, CI (2.47, 8.31), p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that high post-operative-MME consumption was significantly associated with extended LOS in patients undergoing PSF for AIS. In light of these findings, changes to existing protocols that decrease the reliance on opioids for post-operative analgesia are merited to improve patient outcomes and reduce health-care expenditures.

Randomized Trial on Expectations and Pain Control Advancement in Surgery: The REPAIR Study

IMPORTANCE

Following standardized preoperative education and adoption of shared decision making positively affects postoperative narcotic practices.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of patient-centered preoperative education and shared decision making on the quantities of postoperative narcotics prescribed and consumed after urogynecologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Women undergoing urogynecologic surgery were randomized to "standard" (standard preoperative education, standard narcotic quantities at discharge) or "patient-centered" (patient-informed preoperative education, choice of narcotic quantities at discharge) groups. At discharge, the "standard" group received 30 (major surgery) or 12 (minor surgery) pills of 5-mg oxycodone. The "patient-centered" group chose 0 to 30 (major surgery) or 0 to 12 (minor surgery) pills. Outcomes included postoperative narcotics consumed and unused. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction/preparedness, return to activity, and pain interference. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 174 women; 154 were randomized and completed the major outcomes of interest (78 in the standard group, 76 in the patient-centered group). Narcotic consumption did not differ between groups (standard group: median of 3.5 pills, interquartile range [IQR] of [0, 8.25]; patient centered: median of 2, IQR of [0, 9.75]; P = 0.627). The patient-centered group had fewer narcotics prescribed ( P < 0.001) and unused ( P < 0.001), and chose a median of 20 pills (IQR [10, 30]) after a major surgical procedure and 12 pills (IQR [6, 12]) after a minor surgical procedure, with fewer unused narcotics (median difference, 9 pills; 95% confidence interval, 5-13; P < 0.001). There were no differences between groups' return to function, pain interference, and preparedness or satisfaction ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-centered education did not decrease narcotic consumption. Shared decision making did decrease prescribed and unused narcotics. Shared decision making in narcotic prescribing is feasible and may improve postoperative prescribing practices.

Opioids in Urology: How Well Are We Preventing Opioid Dependence and How Can We Do Better?

Urologic procedures (both open and minimally invasive) can cause pain due to the surgery itself, devices placed, and post-operative issues. Thus, pain management is important for every post-procedure recovery period. Opioid use post-surgery is common and often over-prescribed contributing to persistent use by patients. In this article, we review the extent of opioid use in pediatric urologic procedures, vasectomy, endourologic procedures, penile implantation, urogynecologic procedures, prostatectomy, nephrectomy, cystectomy, and scrotal/testicular cancer surgery. Generally, we have found that institutions do not have a standardized protocol with a set regimen to prescribe opioids, resulting in more opioids being prescribed than needed and patients not properly disposing of their unused prescriptions. However, many institutions recognize their opioid overuse and are implementing new multimodal opioid-sparing analgesics methods such as non-opioid peri-operative medications, minimally invasive robotic surgery, and nerve blocks or local anesthetics with varying degrees of success. By shedding light on these opioid-free methods and prescription protocols, along with improved patient education and counselling, we hope to bring awareness to institutions and decrease unnecessary opioid use.