Structure and function of a trauma intensive care unit: A report from the Trauma Intensive Care Unit Prevalence Project

Does the injury pattern drive the surgical treatment strategy in multiply injured patients with major fractures?

BACKGROUND

The timing of definitive surgery in multiple injured patients remains a topic of debate, and multiple concepts have been described. Although these included injury severity as a criterion to decide on the indications for surgery, none of them considered the influence of injury distributions. We analyzed whether injury distribution is associated with certain surgical strategies and related outcomes in a cohort of patients treated according to principles of early and safe fixation strategies.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, multiple injured patients were included if they were primarily admitted to a Level I trauma center, had an Injury Severity Score of ≥16 points, and required surgical intervention for major injuries and fractures. The primary outcome measure was treatment strategy. The treatment strategy was classified according to the timing of definitive surgery after injury: early total care (ETC, <24 hours), safe definitive surgery (SDS, <48 hours), and damage control (DC, >48 hours). Statistics included univariate and multivariate analyses of mortality and the association of injury distributions and surgical tactics.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, 1,471 patients were included (mean ± SD age, 55.6 ± 20.4 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 23.1 ± 11.4). The group distribution was as follows: ETC, n = 85 (5.8%); SDS, n = 665 (45.2%); and DC, n = 721 (49.0%); mortality was 22.4% in ETC, 16.1% in SDS, and 39.7% in DC. Severe nonlethal abdominal injuries (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.5) and spinal injuries (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) were associated with ETC, while multiple extremity injuries were associated with SDS (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.2). Severe traumatic brain injury was associated with DC (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4). When a correction for the severity of head, abdominal, spinal, and extremity injuries, as well as differences in the values of admission pathophysiologic parameters were undertaken, the mortality was 30% lower in the SDS group when compared with the DC group (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4).

CONCLUSION

Major spinal injuries and certain abdominal injuries, if identified as nonlethal, trigger definitive surgeries in the initial setting. In contrast, severe TBI was associated with delayed fracture care. Patients with major fractures and other injuries were treated by SDS (definitive care, <48 hours) when the pathophysiological response was adequate. The choice of a favorable surgical treatment appears to depend on injury patterns and physiological patient responses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Does Practice Match Training? Consultation Practices in Surgical Critical Care

INTRODUCTION

Intensive care unit (ICU) patient and provider attributes may prompt specialty consultation. We sought to determine practice patterns of surgical critical care (SCC) physicians for ICU consultation.

METHODS

We surveyed American Association for the Surgery of Trauma members. Various diagnoses were listed under each of nine related specialties. Respondents were asked for which conditions they would consult a specialist. Conditions were cross-referenced with the SCC fellowship curriculum. Other perspectives on practice and consultation were queried.

RESULTS

314 physicians (18.6%) responded (68% male; 79% White; 96.2% surgical intensivist); 284 (16.8%) completed all questions. Percentage of clinical time practicing SCC was 26-50% in 57% and >50% in 14.5%. ICUs were closed (39%), open (25%), or hybrid (36%). Highest average confidence ratings (1 = least, 5 = most) for managing select conditions were ventilator, 4.64; palliative care, 4.51; infections, 4.44; organ donation, hemodynamics (tie), 4.31; lowest rating was myocardial ischemia, 3.85. Consults were more frequent for Cardiology, Hematology, and Neurology; less frequent for nephrology, palliative care, gastroenterology, infectious disease, and pulmonary; and low for curriculum topics (<25%) except for infectious diseases and palliative care. Attending staffing 24 h/day was associated with a lower mean number of topics for consultation (mean 24.03 versus 26.31, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

ICU consultation practices vary based on consultant specialty and patient diagnosis. Consultation is most common for specialty-specific diseases and specialist interventions, but uncommon for topics found in the SCC curriculum, suggesting that respondents' scope of practice closely matched their training.

Protocol Use in Surgical Intensive Care Units

BACKGROUND

Protocols are common in intensive care, however the association between protocol prevalence and outcomes in surgical ICU patients is unclear. We hypothesized that ICUs in a multicenter database using more protocols had better outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 2-d prevalence study with 30-d follow up, on surgical and trauma patients in ICUs at 42 trauma centers. Use of forty clinical protocols was queried. Protocol prevalence was categorized by quartile into Low (first), Moderate (second and third), or High (fourth) use ICUs. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were ventilator, ICU, and hospital days, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, renal replacement, transfusion, and hospital-acquired infections.

RESULTS

Data from 1044 surgical and trauma patients were analyzed. Protocol use was not different for "closed" (n = 20), "open" (n = 9), or "semi-open" (n = 13) ICUs (P= 0.20). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 8.4%, and not associated with number of protocols (OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.98-1.03], P= 0.65). There was no statistically significant difference between High and Low use ICUs for ventilator days (OR 0.86; 0.52-1.43), tracheostomy (OR 0.8; 0.47-1.38), renal replacement therapy (OR 0.66; 0.04-9.82), transfusion (OR 0.95; 0.58-1.57), or hospital-acquired infections (OR 1.07; 0.67-1.7). Higher mortality was seen in open (versusclosed; OR 1.74 [1.05-2.89], P= 0.033), and surgical/trauma (versustrauma; OR 1.86 [1.33-2.61]; P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter observational study of surgical ICU patients, no association was found between the number of protocols used and patient outcomes.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the trauma intensive care unit: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee Clinical Consensus Document

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potential sequela of injury, surgery, and critical illness. Patients in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit are at risk for this condition, prompting daily discussions during patient care rounds and routine use of mechanical and/or pharmacologic prophylaxis measures. While VTE rightfully garners much attention in clinical patient care and in the medical literature, optimal strategies for VTE prevention are still evolving. Furthermore, trauma and surgical patients often have real or perceived contraindications to prophylaxis that affect the timing of preventive measures and the consistency with which they can be applied. In this Clinical Consensus Document, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee addresses several practical clinical questions pertaining to specific or unique aspects of VTE prophylaxis in critically ill and injured patients.

Prioritizing Communication in the Provision of Palliative Care for the Trauma Patient

Purpose of Review

Communication skills in the ICU are an essential part of the care of trauma patients. The goal of this review is to summarize key aspects of our understanding of communication with injured patients in the ICU.

Recent Findings

The need to communicate effectively and empathetically with patients and identify primary goals of care is an essential part of trauma care in the ICU. The optimal design to support complex communication in the ICU will be dependent on institutional experience and resources. The best/worst/most likely model provides a structural model for communication.

Summary

We have an imperative to improve the communication for all patients, not just those at the end of their life. A structured approach is important as is involving family at all stages of care. Communication skills can and should be taught to trainees.

Trauma intensive care unit (TICU) at Hamad General Hospital

Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and thus represents a great global health challenge. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 9% of deaths in the world are the result of trauma.1 In addition, approximately 100 million people are temporarily or permanently disabled every year.2 The situation is no different in Qatar, and injury related morbidity and mortality is increasing in the entire region, with road traffic collisions (RTCs) being the most common mechanism.1 It is well recognized now that trauma care provided in high-volume, dedicated, level-one trauma centers, improves outcome. Studies have also looked at what are the components of a trauma system that contribute to their effectiveness2. However, in general, it usually implies a high-volume of cases, dedicated full-time trauma qualified professionals, a solid pre-hospital system, a multidisciplinary team, and excellent rehabilitation services. Similarly, critically injured trauma patients managed in a dedicated trauma intensive care unit (TICU), has been shown to improve outcomes, especially for polytrauma patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).3 In fact, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma requires verified trauma centers to have a designated ICU, and that a trauma surgeon be its director.4 Furthermore, studies have shown that for TBI, it is not necessary for this ICU to be a neurocritical care unit, but rather it should be a unit that is dedicated to trauma, that has standardized protocols for TBI management.5,6 In fact, the outcomes are better in the latter, with lower mortality in multiple-injured patients with TBI, when admitted to a TICU (versus a medical-surgical ICU or neurocritical care unit).3 These benefits were shown to increase, with increased injury severity. The proposed reason for this is thought to be due to the associated injuries being managed better.7 The aim of this editorial is to describe the TICU at Hamad General Hospital (HGH), at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), including a comparison of its data and outcomes with other similar trauma centers in the world. The Qatar Trauma Registry, as well as previous publications from our Trauma Center,1,8 were used to obtain HGH TICU and worldwide Level-1 Trauma Center standards, respectively. With respect to HGH, the TICU is part of an integrated trauma program, the only level-1 trauma centre in Qatar. It provides the highest standard of care for critically-ill trauma patients admitted at HGH, striving to achieve the best outcomes, excellence in evidence-based patient care, up to date technology, and a high level of academics in research and teaching. This integrated program includes an excellent pre-hospital unit, emergency and trauma resuscitation unit, TICU, trauma step-down unit (TSDU), inpatient ward, and rehabilitation unit. The new TICU is a closed 19-bed unit, that was inaugurated in 2016, is managed 24/7 by highly qualified and experienced intensivists (9 senior consultants and consultants), along with 24 well-trained and experienced associate consultants or specialists, and fellows and residents in training, as well as expert nursing staff (1:1 nurse to patient ratio) and allied health professionals (respiratory therapists, pharmacists, dieticians, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, social workers, case managers, and psychologists). It is supported by all medical and surgical subspecialty services. It is equipped with the latest state-of-the-art technology and equipment, including 'intelligent ventilators", neuro-monitoring devices, ultrasound, point-of-care testing such as arterial blood gas and rotational thromboelastrometry (ROTEM), and video airway devices. The TICU is a teaching unit, linked to the HMC Medical Education department, with presence of fellows, and residents (see below for details). Medical students (Clerkship level) from Weill-Cornell Medicine Qatar also complete a one-week rotation in the TICU, as part of their exposure to critical care. The first batch of clerks from Qatar University College of Medicine are expected to start rotating in the TICU soon. The Trauma Critical Care Fellowship Program (TCCFP) is an ACGME (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) fellowship that was established over seven years ago. To date, over 40 physicians from both within, and out of, the trauma department have completed the program. Up to seven fellows, including international candidates, are trained each year. A number of physicians have succeeded in gaining the European Diploma of Intensive Care Medicine (EDIC). The program continues to attract many applicants from various specialties including surgery, anesthesia, and emergency medicine. An increasing number of international physicians from Europe and South America have expressed interest in applying for our fellowship. The first international fellows are likely to join us from early 2020. Residents (from general surgery, ER, ENT, plastics, orthopedics, and neurosurgery) rotate (one to three months' rotations) in the TICU, and are actively part of the clinical team. There were 568 admissions to the TICU in 2018. The patients admitted were either mainly polytrauma patients with varying degrees and combinations of head, chest, abdominal, pelvic, spine, and orthopedic injuries, or isolated-TBI. Of these patients, 378 were severely injured with an injury severity score (ISS)9 greater than 16. According to previously published data from our Trauma Centre,1,8 our mortality rates (overall approximately 6-7%, as well as when looked at in terms of early and late deaths) compare favorably with other trauma centers around the world, when looking at similarly sized retrospective studies. The TICU continues to be an active member of the Critical Care Network of HMC.10 This network involves all of the ICU's in all the HMC facilities. The main processes that the TICU is presently involved in as part of this network are: patient flow, clinical practice guidelines, evaluation and procurement of technologies, HMC sepsis program, and in general, taking part in any process that pertains to critical care at HMC. A number of quality improvement projects are being undertaken in the TICU. Examples of such projects include: - Decreasing rates of infection in TICU- Score-guided sedation orders to decrease sedation use, ventilator days and length of stay- Reducing blood taking and associated costs- Sepsis alert response and bundle compliance- Medical and surgical management of rib fracturesA multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals participate in these projects, and meet once a month to review all projects. Similarly, many research projects are taking place in the TICU, in coordination with the Trauma Research program, and often in collaboration with other departments (local and international). Examples of some of the research projects include: - The "POLAR" study (RCT on Hypothermia in TBI)11- B-blockers in TBI (RCT-ongoing)- Tranexamic acid (TXA) for bleeding in trauma (RCT-ongoing) The team is also involved in conducting systematic reviews in relation to the role of transcranial doppler in TBI,12 sepsis in TBI patients (ongoing), self-extubation in TBI patients,13 safety and efficacy of phenytoin in TBI (ongoing), and optic nerve diameter for predicting outcome in TBI (submitted). The TICU at HGH is a high-volume, high acuity unit that manages all the severely injured trauma patients in Qatar. It is well staffed with highly trained and qualified personnel, and utilizes the latest in technology and state-of-the-art equipment. It performs very well, when compared to other similar units in the world, and achieves a comparable, or even lower mortality rate. With continued great support from the hospital, corporation administration, and Ministry of Public Health, the future goals of the TICU will be to maintain and improve upon the high standards of clinical care it provides, as well as perform a high quality and quantity of research, quality improvement initiatives, and educational work, in order for it to be amongst the best trauma critical care units in the world.

Older Adults With Isolated Rib Fractures Do Not Require Routine Intensive Care Unit Admission

BACKGROUND

Older adults with isolated rib fractures are often admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) because of presumedly increased morbidity and mortality. However, evidence-based guidelines are limited. We sought to identify characteristics of these patients that predict the need for ICU care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed patients ≥50 y old at our center during 2013-2017 whose only indication for ICU admission, if any, was isolated rib fractures. The primary outcome was any critical care intervention (e.g., intubation) or adverse event (e.g., hypoxemia) (CCIE) based on accepted critical care guidelines. We used stepwise logistic regression to identify characteristics that predict CCIEs.

RESULTS

Among 401 patients, 251 (63%) were admitted to an ICU. Eighty-three patients (33%) admitted to an ICU and 7 (5%) admitted to the ward experienced a CCIE. The most common CCIEs were hypotension (10%), frequent respiratory therapy (9%), and oxygen desaturation (8%). Predictors of CCIEs included incentive spirometry <1 L (OR 4.72, 95% CI 2.14-10.45); use of a walker (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.29-6.34); increased chest Abbreviated Injury Scale score (AIS 3 OR 5.83, 95% CI 2.34-14.50); age ≥72 y (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.48-4.86); and active smoking (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.06-4.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine ICU admission is not necessary for most older adults with isolated rib fractures. The predictors we identified warrant prospective evaluation for development of a clinical decision rule to preclude unnecessary ICU admissions.