Evaluation and management of abdominal gunshot wounds: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm

Selective nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Since the 1990s, there has been a slow but steady adoption of selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for abdominal gunshot wounds (GSW). Multiple studies have shown that SNOM is feasible and can be performed safely, even at trauma centers with low penetrating trauma volumes. The principles of SNOM for abdominal GSW consists of (1) careful patient selection, (2) diagnostic workup with CT, and (3) clinical observation. By implementing SNOM, the number of patients undergoing a nontherapeutic laparotomy can significantly be improved to less than 10%. Overall, approximately one third of patients with abdominal GSW can be managed nonoperatively. This review article provides a practical approach to the management of patients with an abdominal GSW.

Blast injuries: The experience of a level 1 trauma center

BACKGROUND

There is a global surge in blast injuries, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. To our knowledge, there are no guidelines for the management of blast injuries in the trauma bay.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study utilized data on all patients admitted to our emergency department (ED) with terror- or combat-related injuries between October 7, 2023 (Gaza Iron Swords War onset) and February 4, 2024. The primary outcome was trauma severity indicated by either an injury severity score (ISS) >15 and/or need for acute care. We also analyzed the mechanisms of injuries, focusing on those resulting from blasts.

RESULTS

Of 208 patients who were admitted following terror-and combat related injuries, 109 patients (101 males [93 %], median age 24.0 years) were admitted following blast injuries. Of them, 88 % were military personnel and 12 % were civilians, with a median ISS of 8 [IQR:4.0-17.0]. The level of trauma was severe in 48 patients (44 %). Tertiary sub-category of blast injuries (P =0.004), chest (P =0.032), abdomen (P =0.018), and lower extremities (P =0.044) injuries were significantly associated with severe trauma. Blast injuries mandated the urgent availability of specialist personnel and appropriate equipment to contend with multiple life-threatening sequelae of exposure to blasts upon the arrival of the victims to emergency services.

CONCLUSION

Blast injuries present unique challenges in management and demand a multidisciplinary approach and specialized resources. We present an algorithm for terror- and combat-related blast injuries treated in our trauma bay. The step-by-step procedures may be applicable to any blast injury sustained under variable conditions.

Firearm injury to the left buttock with uterus penetrating trauma

A multispecialty trauma team must provide care for pelvic gunshot wounds (PGW) due to the high risk of associated morbidity and mortality, the high density of organs that might be wounded within the pelvis, and the potential consequences of these complicated injuries. We present a case of a 59-year-old woman hemodynamically stable with firearm injury to the left buttock. CT examination showed free air in the peritoneal cavity and in the retroperitoneum and a focal contrast extravasation within the uterine fundus. The patient underwent urgent laparotomy that revealed triple bowel perforation (sigmoid colon, medium rectum, ileum) and a laceration of the posterior and anterior uterine wall at level of the cervix with no signs of active bleeding. The bullet was lodged above the peritoneal reflection, in the right pelvis, and it was removed, and handed over to the judicial authority. The perforated bowel segments were resected with Hartmann's procedure and ileal anastomosis. The uterine laceration was repaired. Although all the viscera and the structures along the trajectory can be harmed, pelvic gunshot wounds have the potential to inflict serious injury. Nongravid uterine traumas are a unique occurrence, and proper care requires an understanding of lesion grading. Finding the gynecological lesion in female patients is essential to receiving the best care and protecting the reproductive system.

To the point: Utility of laparoscopy for operative management of stabbing abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

Algorithms for managing penetrating abdominal trauma are conflicting or vague regarding the role of laparoscopy. We hypothesized that laparoscopy is underutilized among hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds.

METHODS

Trauma Quality Improvement Program data (2016-2019) were used to identify stable (SBP ≥110 and GCS ≥13) patients ≥16yrs with stab wounds and an abdominal procedure within 24hr of admission. Patients with a non-abdominal AIS ≥3 or missing outcome information were excluded. Patients were analyzed based on index procedure approach: open, therapeutic laparoscopy (LAP), or LAP-conversion to open (LCO). Center, clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared according to surgical approach and abdominal AIS using non-parametric analysis.

RESULTS

5984 patients met inclusion criteria with 7 ​% and 8 ​% receiving therapeutic LAP and LCO, respectively. The conversion rate for patients initially treated with LAP was 54 ​%. Compared to conversion or open, therapeutic LAP patients had better outcomes including shorter ICU and hospital stays and less infection complications, but were younger and less injured. Assessing by abdominal AIS eliminated ISS differences, meanwhile LAP patients still had shorter hospital stays. At time of admission, 45 ​% of open patients met criteria for initial LAP opportunity as indicated by comparable clinical presentation as therapeutic laparoscopy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopy remains infrequently utilized despite its increasing inclusion in current guidelines. Additional opportunity exists for therapeutic laparoscopy in trauma, which appears to be a viable alternative to open surgery for select injuries from abdominal stab wounds.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics, Therapy, and Short-Term Prognosis between Blunt and Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

Large-scale studies on the characteristics and management of abdominal trauma in megacities in China are lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze and present the clinical patterns and treatment status of abdominal trauma in regional medical centers.

Methods

Cases of abdominal trauma treated at seven medical centers in Beijing from 2010 to 2021 were collected. Clinical information about age, sex, injury cause, geographic distribution, abbreviated injury scale/injury severity score (AIS/ISS) value, injury-hospital time, preoperative time, surgically identified organ injuries, type of surgery, causes of reoperation and 90-day mortality was included in this study. Clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and short-term prognoses (90-days survival) were compared between blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) cases. Non-normally distributed data are described as medians (IQR), and the Mann‒Whitney U test was performed; qualitative data were analyzed using the X2 test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed by the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

A total of 553 patients (86.98% male) with a median age of 36.50 (27.00-48.00) years were included. The BAT group had a significantly higher proportion of serious injury (P=0.001), lower initial hemoglobin level (P=0.001), and a lower laparoscopy surgery rate (P=0.044) compared to the PAT group. Additionally, more BAT cases were from the area around Beijing (P=0.008) and a longer injury-regional hospital time (10.47 (5.18-22.51) hours vs. 7.00 (3.80-15.38) hours, P=0.001). In the hollow viscus injury subgroup, the BAT group had a significantly longer injury-regional hospital time and preoperative time compared to the PAT group (injury-regional hospital time: 10.23 (6.00-21.59) hours vs. 7.07 (3.99-13.85) hours, P=0.002; preoperative time: 3.02 (2.01-5.58) hours vs. 2.81 (1.85-3.63) hours, P=0.047). The overall 90-day mortality was 11.9%, and longer injury-regional hospital time (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, P=0.008), receipt of ICU treatment (HR: 4.69, 95% CI: 2.54-8.65, P=0.001), and severe ISSs (ISS > 25 vs. ISS < 16, HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.38-5.601, P=0.004) had a worse impact on survival.

Conclusion

More patients with BAT were transferred to higher-level hospital, leading to significantly longer prehospital and preoperation time. In the subgroup of hemodynamically stable individuals, more patients with BAT experienced hollow viscus injuries. For those patients, aggressive diagnostic laparoscopic exploration may be beneficial. Patients with longer injury-regional hospital intervals, the need for ICU care, and higher injury severity scores (ISSs) suffered from worse prognoses.

Outcomes of selective non-operative management in adults with abdominal gunshot wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Abdominal gunshot wounds (GSWs), a clinically devastating injury, can result in a variety of severe and lethal complications. Traditionally, exploratory laparotomy is the first-line approach for the management of abdominal GSWs, but it is associated with a considerable amount of unnecessary surgeries. At present, selective non-operative management (SNOM) of abdominal GSWs is becoming an effective and well-recognized approach, but it remains widely disputed since many surgeons are skeptical about the validity of SNOM in clinical practice. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the outcomes of SNOM and immediate laparotomy in patients with GSWs by collecting the currently available evidence.

METHODS

The PubMed , EMBASE , and Cochrane Library databases were searched. A random-effects model was employed. A pooled proportion with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, 53 studies involving 60 291 participants were included. The pooled proportions of SNOM and SNOM failure were 27.0% (95% CI=24.0-30.0%) and 10.0% (95% CI=7.0-13.0%), respectively. The pooled mortality after SNOM and SNOM failure were 0.0% (95% CI=0.0-1.0%) and 0.0% (95% CI=0.0-0.0%), respectively. The pooled proportions of immediate laparotomy and unnecessary immediate laparotomy were 73.0% (95% CI=70.0-76.0%) and 10.0% (95% CI=8.0-13.0%), respectively. The pooled mortality after immediate laparotomy and unnecessary immediate laparotomy was 10.0% (95% CI=8.0-13.0%) and 0.0% (95% CI=0.0-1.0%), respectively. Heterogeneity was statistically significant in nearly all meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Immediate laparotomy is still the mainstay approach for the management of abdominal GSWs. Approximately one-third of patients with abdominal GSWs undergo SNOM. SNOM failure is not frequent, and its related mortality is also rare.

Antibiotic Duration Following Abdominal Gunshot Injuries With Associated Pelvis or Spine Involvement: A 20-Year Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis duration following gunshot wounds (GSW) to the abdomen with an associated orthopedic fracture is unknown. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of short versus long courses of prophylactic antibiotics following penetrating hollow viscus injury with communicating orthopedic fracture.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients admitted to the trauma service over a 20-y period who sustained an abdominal GSW with hollow viscus injury and communicating spine or pelvic fractures. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on prophylactic antibiotic duration: short course (SC, ≤48 h) and long course (>48 h). The primary outcome was the incidence of osteomyelitis and meningitis up to 1-y postinjury. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and the incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridioides difficile infections. Risk factors for osteomyelitis and meningitis were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were included with 45 (36%) in the SC group. Median prophylactic antibiotic durations were SC, 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-2) versus long course, 7 (IQR, 5-7) d (P < 0.001). There was no difference in osteomyelitis and meningitis incidence (2 [4.4%] versus 4 [5%], P = 0.77). Median hospital length of stay (7 [IQR, 6-11] versus 9 [IQR, 6-15] d, P = 0.072) and incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms (6 [13.3%] versus 13 [16.3%], P = 0.86) and Clostridioides difficile infections (0 [0%] versus 1 [1.3%], P = 0.77) were similar between groups. There were no independent risk factors identified for osteomyelitis or meningitis.

CONCLUSIONS

A shorter course of antibiotic prophylaxis ≤48 h may be adequate following abdominal GSW that traverses a hollow viscus and results in pelvic fracture or spinal column injury.

Radiologic Imaging of Traumatic Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries: A Comprehensive Up-to-Date Review

Diagnosing bowel and mesenteric trauma poses a significant challenge to radiologists. Although these injuries are relatively rare, immediate laparotomy may be indicated when they occur. Delayed diagnosis and treatment are associated with increased morbidity and mortality; therefore, timely and accurate management is essential. Additionally, employing strategies to differentiate between major injuries requiring surgical intervention and minor injuries considered manageable via non-operative management is important. Bowel and mesenteric injuries are among the most frequently overlooked injuries on trauma abdominal computed tomography (CT), with up to 40% of confirmed surgical bowel and mesenteric injuries not reported prior to operative treatment. This high percentage of falsely negative preoperative diagnoses may be due to several factors, including the relative rarity of these injuries, subtle and non-specific appearances on CT, and limited awareness of the injuries among radiologists. To improve the awareness and diagnosis of bowel and mesenteric injuries, this article provides an overview of the injuries most often encountered, imaging evaluation, CT appearances, and diagnostic pearls and pitfalls. Enhanced diagnostic imaging awareness will improve the preoperative diagnostic yield, which will save time, money, and lives.

Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomy Surgical Interventions for Trauma Patients With Single Upper Left Quadrant Penetrating Injuries: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program Dataset

BACKGROUND

We aim to identify patient cohorts where laparoscopy can be safely utilized with comparable or better outcomes to laparotomy among patients with single penetrating LUQ injuries with a hypothesis that compared to laparotomy, laparoscopy may be associated with equal or improved outcomes of low injury severity patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the ACS-TQP-Participant Use File 2016-2019 dataset. Patients with single LUQ penetrating injuries were included. Primary outcome was risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included: risk-adjusted complication rates, hospital length-of-stay (H-LOS), and ICU-LOS. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression with reliability adjustments to account for variations in practice were performed.

RESULTS

Of 4149 patients analyzed, 3571 (86.1%) underwent laparotomy, 489 (11.8%) underwent laparoscopy, and 89 (2.1%) underwent laparoscopy-to-laparotomy conversion. Adjusted mortality rates were not significantly different among all study cohorts (P > .05). Compared to laparoscopy, adjusted odds of complications were 4.3-fold higher for all patients who underwent laparotomy and 4-fold higher for laparoscopy-to-laparotomy (LtL) patients (P < .05). Diaphragmatic injuries were associated with significantly increased odds of undergoing LtL, whereas sustaining a colonic injury, gastric injury, hepatic injury, or requiring PRBC transfusions were associated with significantly increased odds of undergoing laparotomy (P < .05). H-LOS (days) was significantly longer for patients who underwent laparotomy compared to laparoscopy (3.9 ± 4.0 vs. 10.8 ± 13.4, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy may be considered a viable alternative to laparotomy for hemodynamically stable adult patients with single penetrating LUQ injuries of low injury burden validating our hypothesis. Laparoscopy may be less safe for patients with associated diaphragmatic, colonic, or hepatic injuries.

Treatment of a gunshot wound (birdshot) patient with traumatic shock in a hybrid emergency room

Background

Although the Hybrid Emergency Room System (HERS) is a relatively novel method for treating severe trauma patients, there have been few reported cases of gunshot wound patients treated in HERS. Here we report our treatment of a unique gunshot wound case, with shock, in a HERS setting.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old male was transferred to our hospital due to a gunshot wound (GSW). He presented with left chest injuries and vital signs consistent with shock. While resuscitating the patient, including massive blood transfusion and surgery to control the damage, a subsequent computed tomography in HERS revealed the internal distribution of the birdshot and damage to the abdominal organs. Lower lobectomy of the left lung and laparotomy for gastrointestinal repair were performed. After a planned repeat operation and reconstruction of the left chest wall, he was discharged uneventfully.

Conclusions

HERS during resuscitation was useful for helping clinicians not only to find the bullets' distribution and judge the severity of injury caused by the gunshot, but also to develop subsequent therapeutic strategies for rescuing the gunshot wound patient from a life-threatening situation.

An Unusual Case of Fatal Thoracoabdominal Gunshot Wound without Diaphragm Injury

In case of thoracoabdominal gunshot wounds (GSW), diaphragmatic lesions are common autopsy findings. In these cases, the bullet’s path involves both the thorax and the abdomen, so the diaphragm (the muscle that separates the two cavities) is frequently damaged. In the present report we illustrate a very unusual autopsy finding, came up after a man was shot twice and affected by a lethal thoracoabdominal gunshot wound. In particular, as expected based on CT scans, the corpse exhibited a thoracic-abdominal path and a retained bullet in the abdomen, but no diaphragmatic lesions or hemorrhagic infiltrations of this muscle have been detected during the autopsy. After a scrupulous examination and the section of all the organs, the intracorporeal projectile’s path was reconstructed, inferring that the thoracoabdominal transit of the bullet extraordinarily had occurred in correspondence of the diaphragmatic inferior vena cava’s ostium, thus exploiting a natural passage without damaging the diaphragmatic muscle.

Role of Cancer Surgery in the Improvement of the Operative Skills of Military Surgeons During Deployment: A Single-Center Study

INTRODUCTION

The maintenance of military surgeons' operative skills is challenging. Different and specific training strategies have been implemented in this context; however, little has been evaluated with regard to their effectiveness. Cancer surgery is a part of military surgeons' activities in their home hospitals. This study aimed to assess the role of oncological surgery in the improvement of military surgeons' operative skills.

METHODS

Between January and June 2019, the surgical activities of the departments of visceral, ear, nose, and throat, urological, and thoracic surgery were retrospectively reviewed and assessed in terms of the operative time (OT). All surgeons working at the Sainte Anne Military Teaching Hospital were sent a survey to rate on a 5-point scale the current surgical practices on their usefulness in improving surgical skills required for treating war injuries during deployment (primary endpoint) and to compare on a 10-point visual analog scale the influence of cancer surgery and specific training on surgical fluency (secondary endpoint).

RESULTS

Over the study period, 2,571 hours of OT was analyzed. Oncological surgery represented 52.5% of the surgical activity and almost 1,350 hours of cumulative OT. Considering the primary endpoint, the mean rating allocated to cancer surgery was 4.53 ± 0.84, which was not statistically different than that allocated to trauma surgery (4.42 ± 1.02, P = 0.98) but higher than other surgery (2.47 ± 1.00, P < 0.001). Considering the secondary endpoint, cancer surgery was rated higher than specific training by all surgeons, without statistically significant difference (positive mean score of + 2.00; 95% IC: 0.85-3.14).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the usefulness of cancer surgery in improving the operative skills of military surgeons.

Assessment of post-trauma complications in eight million trauma cases over a decade in the USA

BACKGROUND

Trauma is associated with a significant risk of post-trauma complications (PTCs). These include thromboembolic events, strokes, infections, and failure of organ systems (eg, kidney failure). Although care of the trauma patient has evolved during the last decade, whether this has resulted in a reduction in specific PTCs is unknown. We hypothesize that the incidence of PTCs has been decreasing during a 10-year period from 2007 to 2017.

METHODS

This is a descriptive study of trauma patients originating from level 1, 2, 3, and 4 trauma centers in the USA, obtained via the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2007 to 2017. PTCs documented throughout the time frame were extracted along with demographic variables. Multiple regression modeling was used to associate admission year with PTCs, while controlling for age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Injury Severity Score.

RESULTS

Data from 8 720 026 trauma patients were extracted from the TQIP database. A total of 366 768 patients experienced one or more PTCs. There was a general decrease in the incidence of PTCs during the study period, with the overall incidence dropping from 7.0% in 2007 to 2.8% in 2017. Multiple regression identified a slight decrease in incidence in all PTCs, although deep surgical site infection (SSI), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and stroke incidences increased when controlled for confounders.

DISCUSSION

Overall the incidence of PTCs dropped during the 10-year study period, although deep SSI, DVT, stroke, and cardiac arrest increased during the study period. Better risk prediction tools, enabling a precision medicine approach, are warranted to identify at-risk patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Tumbling Bullet: Subacute Intestinal Obstruction due to a Retained Bullet

A 29-year-old female presented with multiple gunshot wounds to the back and bilateral lower extremities. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy with small-bowel resection of two segments with primary stapled anastomosis and partial nephrectomy. The postoperative course showed prolonged intermittent bowel obstruction secondary to the bullet, which lodged in the distal ileum. The patient eventually passed the bullet; it, however, led to a delay in recovery.

The Evolution of Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Gunshot Wounds in the United States

BACKGROUND

Surgical exploration for gunshot wounds to the abdomen has been a surgical standard for the greater part of the past century. Recently, nonoperative management (NOM) has been deemed as a safe option for abdominal gunshot wounds (AGWs). The aim of this analysis was to review the utilization of NOM and mortality after AGWs.

METHODS

We performed a 2010-2014 retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality and Improvement Program. We included all adult (aged 18 and older) patients with AGWs. NOM was defined as nonsurgical intervention within the first 6 h. Outcome measures were trends of utilization of NOM and mortality. Cochrane-Armitage trend analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 808,272 trauma patients were identified, and 16,866 patients with AGWs were included. During the study period, the incidence of AGWs increased, whereas the proportion of bowel injury (P = 0.75) and solid organ injury (P = 0.44) did not change. The NOM rate of AGW increased (2010: 19.5% versus 2014: 27%, P < 0.001). This was accompanied by a decrease in mortality rate (11% versus 9.4%, P = 0.01). Likewise, there was an increase in the use of angiography (7.5% versus 27%, P < 0.001) and laparoscopy (0.9% versus 2.6%, P < 0.001). Overall, 9.8% of the patients had failed NOM. There was no difference in mortality in patients who were managed successfully or failed NOM (5% versus 4.6%, P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

NOM of AGW is more prevalent and is associated with a decrease in mortality rate. Selective NOM may be practiced safely after AGWs.