Fentanyl impairs but ketamine preserves the microcirculatory response to hemorrhage

Effects of esketamine-sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in women following cesarean section: A randomized clinical trial

Background

Postoperative pain following cesarean section can cause maternal anxiety, limited ambulation, and even postpartum depression. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of esketamine for postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in women following cesarean section.

Methods

One hundred women were randomly assigned to two groups. The esketamine group received 1 mg⋅kg-1⋅d-1 of esketamine +1 µg⋅kg-1⋅d-1 of sufentanil for intravenous postoperative analgesia, and the control group received 1 µg⋅kg-1⋅d-1 of sufentanil for intravenous analgesia. The primary outcome was the pain intensity during the postoperative 24 h, and it was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters, total consumption of analgesics, blood loss, and drug-related side effects (hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting).

Results

The VAS scores at rest were lower in the esketamine group than in the control group during the postoperative 6 h-24 h (p < 0.05), and the VAS scores at cough in the esketamine group were lower during the postoperative 4 h-24 h (p < 0.05). There were significant differences at blood loss during the postoperative 24 h (137.6 ± 33.0 vs 159.6 ± 41.3 mL, p = 0.004). Blood pressure and heart rate were greater in the esketamine group than in the control group during the postoperative 8 h-24 h (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the control group (4% vs 18%, p = 0.025).

Conclusion

This study indicated that esketamine not only improved postoperative pain but also reduced postpartum blood loss and the incidence of nausea and vomiting in women undergoing cesarean section (registration number: ChiCTR2400082094).

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn, Identifier ChiCTR2400082094.

Low-dose sufentanil does not affect tolerance to LBNP-induced central hypovolemia or blood pressure responses during a cold pressor test

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in the prehospital setting. Since trauma-induced pain often accompanies a hemorrhagic insult, the administered pain medication must not interfere with critical autonomic regulation of arterial blood pressure and vital organ perfusion. The purpose of this study was to test two unrelated hypotheses: 1) sublingual sufentanil (Dsuvia) impairs tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia and 2) sublingual sufentanil attenuates pain sensation and the accompanying cardiovascular responses to a noxious stimulus. Twenty-nine adults participated in this double-blinded, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. After sublingual administration of sufentanil (30 μg) or placebo, participants completed a progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) challenge to tolerance (aim 1). After a recovery period, participants completed a cold pressor test (CPT; aim 2). Addressing the first aim, tolerance to LBNP was not different between trials (P = 0.495). Decreases in systolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of LBNP also did not differ between trials (time P < 0.001, trial P = 0.477, interaction P = 0.587). Finally, increases in heart rate from baseline to the end of LBNP did not differ between trials (time P < 0.001, trial P = 0.626, interaction P = 0.424). Addressing the second aim, sufentanil attenuated perceived pain (P < 0.001) in response to the CPT, though the magnitude of the change in mean blood pressure during the CPT (P = 0.078) was not different between trials. These data demonstrate that sublingual sufentanil does not impair tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia. Additionally, sublingual sufentanil attenuates perceived pain, but not the accompanying mean blood pressure responses to the CPT.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Addressing two unique aims, we observed that sublingual sufentanil administration does not impair tolerance or cardiovascular responses to lower-body negative pressure (LBNP)-induced progressive central hypovolemia. Second, despite pain perception being reduced, sublingual sufentanil did not attenuate mean blood pressure responses to a cold pressor test (CPT).

Abuse potential of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues

Introduction

In this perspective review, we evaluated the clinical management of fatal fentanyl overdose in several routes of administration, concentrating on both legally prescribed and illegally produced formulations.

Methods

A literature search was conducted on Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases, using the following keywords: fentanyl, illicit fentanyl, deaths, misuse, abuse, and naloxone. We included only articles whose abstracts were available in English. All articles were screened using their abstracts to determine their relevance to the current review.

Results

The gold standard for treating both acute and chronic pain is fentanyl, but abuse of the drug has exploded globally since the late 2000s. Fentanyl abuse has been shown to frequently result in serious harm and even death.

Conclusion

By educating patients and physicians, making rescue kits easily accessible, developing vaccines to prevent opioid addiction, and perhaps even creating new tamper-resistant fentanyl formulations, it may be possible to prevent fentanyl misuse, therapeutic errors, and the repercussions that follow.

Haemodynamic effects of methoxyflurane versus fentanyl and placebo in hypovolaemia: a randomised, double-blind crossover study in healthy volunteers

Background

Methoxyflurane is approved for relief of moderate to severe pain in conscious adult trauma patients: it may be self-administrated and is well suited for use in austere environments. Trauma patients may sustain injuries causing occult haemorrhage compromising haemodynamic stability, and it is therefore important to elucidate whether methoxyflurane may adversely affect the haemodynamic response to hypovolaemia.

Methods

In this randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study, inhaled methoxyflurane 3 ml, i.v. fentanyl 25 μg, and placebo were administered to 15 healthy volunteers exposed to experimental hypovolaemia in the lower body negative pressure model. The primary endpoint was the effect of treatment on changes in cardiac output, while secondary endpoints were changes in stroke volume and mean arterial pressure and time to haemodynamic decompensation during lower body negative pressure.

Results

There were no statistically significant effects of treatment on the changes in cardiac output, stroke volume, or mean arterial pressure during lower body negative pressure. The time to decompensation was longer for methoxyflurane compared with fentanyl (hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 0.4-3.4; P=0.010), whereas there was no significant difference to placebo (hazard ratio -1.3; 95% confidence interval -2.8 to 0.23; P=0.117).

Conclusions

The present study does not indicate that methoxyflurane has significant adverse haemodynamic effects in conscious adults experiencing hypovolaemia.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04641949) and EudraCT (2019-004144-29) https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-004144-29/NO.

Comparing the Effects of Low-Dose Ketamine, Fentanyl, and Morphine on Hemorrhagic Tolerance and Analgesia in Humans

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. Ketamine, fentanyl, and morphine are recommended analgesics for use in the prehospital (i.e., field) setting to reduce pain. However, it is unknown whether any of these analgesics reduce hemorrhagic tolerance in humans. We tested the hypothesis that fentanyl (75 µg) and morphine (5 mg), but not ketamine (20 mg), would reduce tolerance to simulated hemorrhage in conscious humans. Each of the three analgesics was evaluated independently among different cohorts of healthy adults in a randomized, crossover (within drug/placebo comparison), placebo-controlled fashion using doses derived from the Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines for Medical Personnel. One minute after an intravenous infusion of the analgesic or placebo (saline), we employed a pre-syncopal limited progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) protocol to determine hemorrhagic tolerance. Hemorrhagic tolerance was quantified as a cumulative stress index (CSI), which is the sum of products of the LBNP and the duration (e.g., [40 mmHg x 3 min] + [50 mmHg x 3 min] …). Compared with ketamine (p = 0.002 post hoc result) and fentanyl (p = 0.02 post hoc result), morphine reduced the CSI (ketamine (n = 30): 99 [73-139], fentanyl (n = 28): 95 [68-130], morphine (n = 30): 62 [35-85]; values expressed as a % of the respective placebo trial's CSI; median [IQR]; Kruskal-Wallis test p = 0.002). Morphine-induced reductions in tolerance to central hypovolemia were not well explained by a prediction model including biological sex, body mass, and age (R2=0.05, p = 0.74). These experimental data demonstrate that morphine reduces tolerance to simulated hemorrhage while fentanyl and ketamine do not affect tolerance. Thus, these laboratory-based data, captured via simulated hemorrhage, suggest that morphine should not be used for a hemorrhaging individual in the prehospital setting.

Unique Pharmacology, Brain Dysfunction, and Therapeutic Advancements for Fentanyl Misuse and Abuse

Fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid with analgesic and anesthetic properties. It has become a primary driver of the deadliest opioid crisis in the United States and elsewhere, consequently imposing devastating social, economic, and health burdens worldwide. However, the neural mechanisms that underlie the behavioral effects of fentanyl and its analogs are largely unknown, and approaches to prevent fentanyl abuse and fentanyl-related overdose deaths are scarce. This review presents the abuse potential and unique pharmacology of fentanyl and elucidates its potential mechanisms of action, including neural circuit dysfunction and neuroinflammation. We discuss recent progress in the development of pharmacological interventions, anti-fentanyl vaccines, anti-fentanyl/heroin conjugate vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies to attenuate fentanyl-seeking and prevent fentanyl-induced respiratory depression. However, translational studies and clinical trials are still lacking. Considering the present opioid crisis, the development of effective pharmacological and immunological strategies to prevent fentanyl abuse and overdose are urgently needed.

Low-dose fentanyl reduces pain perception, muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses, and blood pressure responses during the cold pressor test

Our knowledge about how low-dose (analgesic) fentanyl affects autonomic cardiovascular regulation is primarily limited to animal experiments. Notably, it is unknown if low-dose fentanyl influences human autonomic cardiovascular responses during painful stimuli in humans. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that low-dose fentanyl reduces perceived pain and subsequent sympathetic and cardiovascular responses in humans during an experimental noxious stimulus. Twenty-three adults (10 females/13 males; 27 ± 7 yr; 26 ± 3 kg·m^-2, means ± SD) completed this randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial during two laboratory visits. During each visit, participants completed a cold pressor test (CPT; hand in ∼0.4°C ice bath for 2 min) before and 5 min after drug/placebo administration (75 μg fentanyl or saline). We compared pain perception (100-mm visual analog scale), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography, 11 paired recordings), and beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP; photoplethysmography) between trials (at both pre- and postdrug/placebo timepoints) using paired, two-tailed t tests. Before drug/placebo administration, perceived pain (P = 0.8287), ΔMSNA burst frequency (P = 0.7587), and Δmean BP (P = 0.8649) during the CPT were not different between trials. After the drug/placebo administration, fentanyl attenuated perceived pain (36 vs. 66 mm, P < 0.0001), ΔMSNA burst frequency (9 vs. 17 bursts/min, P = 0.0054), and Δmean BP (7 vs. 13 mmHg, P = 0.0174) during the CPT compared with placebo. Fentanyl-induced reductions in pain perception and Δmean BP were moderately related (r = 0.40, P = 0.0641). These data provide valuable information regarding how low-dose fentanyl reduces autonomic cardiovascular responses during an experimental painful stimulus.

Low-dose fentanyl does not alter muscle sympathetic nerve activity, blood pressure, or tolerance during progressive central hypovolemia

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. Several pain medications, including fentanyl, are recommended for use in the prehospital (i.e., field setting) for a hemorrhaging solider. However, it is unknown whether fentanyl impairs arterial blood pressure (BP) regulation, which would compromise hemorrhagic tolerance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that an analgesic dose of fentanyl impairs hemorrhagic tolerance in conscious humans. Twenty-eight volunteers (13 females) participated in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. We conducted a presyncopal limited progressive lower body negative pressure test (LBNP; a validated model to simulate hemorrhage) following intravenous administration of fentanyl (75 µg) or placebo (saline). We quantified tolerance as a cumulative stress index (mmHg·min), which was compared between trials using a paired, two-tailed t test. We also compared muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) and beat-to-beat BP (photoplethysmography) during the LBNP test using a mixed effects model [time (LBNP stage) × trial]. LBNP tolerance was not different between trials (fentanyl: 647 ± 386 vs. placebo: 676 ± 295 mmHg·min, P = 0.61, Cohen's d = 0.08). Increases in MSNA burst frequency (time: P < 0.01, trial: P = 0.29, interaction: P = 0.94) and reductions in mean BP (time: P < 0.01, trial: P = 0.50, interaction: P = 0.16) during LBNP were not different between trials. These data, the first to be obtained in conscious humans, demonstrate that administration of an analgesic dose of fentanyl does not alter MSNA or BP during profound central hypovolemia, nor does it impair tolerance to this simulated hemorrhagic insult.

Low-dose ketamine affects blood pressure, but not muscle sympathetic nerve activity, during progressive central hypovolemia without altering tolerance

KEY POINTS

Haemorrhage is the leading cause of battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. Given that a haemorrhagic injury on the battlefield is almost always associated with pain, it is paramount that the administered pain medication does not disrupt the physiological mechanisms that are beneficial in defending against the haemorrhagic insult. Current guidelines from the US Army's Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) for the selection of pain medications administered to a haemorrhaging soldier are based upon limited scientific evidence, with the clear majority of supporting studies being conducted on anaesthetized animals. Specifically, the influence of low-dose ketamine, one of three analgesics employed in the pre-hospital setting by the US Army, on haemorrhagic tolerance in humans is unknown. For the first time in conscious males and females, the findings of the present study demonstrate that the administration of an analgesic dose of ketamine does not compromise tolerance to a simulated haemorrhagic insult. Increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity during progressive lower-body negative pressure were not different between trials. Despite the lack of differences for muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses, mean blood pressure and heart rate were higher during moderate hypovolemia after ketamine vs. placebo administration.

ABSTRACT

Haemorrhage is the leading cause of battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. For a haemorrhaging soldier, there are several pain medications (e.g. ketamine) recommended for use in the prehospital, field setting. However, the data to support these recommendations are primarily limited to studies in animals. Therefore, it is unknown whether ketamine adversely affects physiological mechanisms responsible for maintenance of arterial blood pressure (BP) during haemorrhage in humans. In humans, ketamine has been demonstrated to raise resting BP, although it has not been studied with the concomitant central hypovolemia that occurs during haemorrhage. Thus, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that ketamine does not impair haemorrhagic tolerance in humans. Thirty volunteers (15 females) participated in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A pre-syncopal limited progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP; a validated model for simulating haemorrhage) test was conducted following the administration of ketamine (20 mg) or placebo (saline). Tolerance was quantified as a cumulative stress index and compared between trials using a paired, two-tailed t test. We compared muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography), beat-to-beat BP (photoplethysmography) and heart rate (electrocardiogram) responses during the LBNP test using a mixed effects model (time [LBNP stage] × drug). Tolerance to the LBNP test was not different between trials (Ketamine: 635 ± 391 vs. Placebo: 652 ± 360 mmHg‧min, p = 0.77). Increases in MSNA burst frequency (time: P < 0.01, trial: p = 0.27, interaction: p = 0.39) during LBNP stages were no different between trials. Despite the lack of differences for MSNA responses, mean BP (time: P < 0.01, trial: P < 0.01, interaction: p = 0.01) and heart rate (time: P < 0.01, trial: P < 0.01, interaction: P < 0.01) were higher during moderate hypovolemia after ketamine vs. placebo administration (P < 0.05 for all, post hoc), but not at the end of LBNP. These data, which are the first to be obtained in conscious humans, demonstrate that the administration of low-dose ketamine does not impair tolerance to simulated haemorrhage or mechanisms responsible for maintenance of BP.

Can Intraoperative Low-Dose R,S-Ketamine Prevent Depressive Symptoms After Surgery? The First Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Background: Postoperative depression is a common complication after surgery that profoundly affects recovery and prognosis. New research indicates that (R,S)-ketamine is a potent antidepressant that exerts a rapid and sustained antidepressive effect. However, there is no consensus on whether intraoperative low-dose (R,S)-ketamine prevents postoperative depression. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and short-term complications of intraoperative low-dose (R,S)-ketamine in preventing postoperative depressive symptoms. Methods: The Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and CNKI databases were systematically searched (last search February 28, 2020) to identify studies involving ketamine. Sensitivity and metaregression analyses were performed to identify potential confounders. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Results: A total of 13 studies (seven in Chinese and six in English) representing 1,148 cases of patients who were treated with (R,S)-ketamine and 874 cases of patients who received other treatments were included in the meta-analysis. Anesthesia duration and blood loss did not significantly differ between the two groups, demonstrating that (R,S)-ketamine was safe (odds ratio,OR: 0.27; 95% CI: -1.14 to 1.68; P = 0.71) for prophylactic treatment of postoperative depression. Blood loss (OR: -1.83; 95% CI: -8.34 to 4.68; P = 0.58), the number of postoperative depressive patients (95% CI: 0.8-1.07; P = 0.08; (R,S)-ketamine: control = 12.9%:15.8%), and postoperative complications (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.44-1.58; P = 0.57; (R,S)-ketamine: control = 19.3%:19.3%) were all similar across groups. Intra-operative low-dose (R,S)-ketamine reduced extubation time (OR: -2.84; 95% CI: -5.48 to -0.21; P = 0.03). Conclusions: The prophylactic anti-depressant effect of (R,S)-ketamine did not significantly differ between the (R,S)-ketamine and control groups in patients undergoing general or spinal anesthesia. However, (R,S)-ketamine use led to a higher incidence of adverse reactions in patients under 40 years of age who underwent a Cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.