Universal screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury

The smallest suffer stroke: Understanding stroke and treatment patterns in children with blunt cerebrovascular injury within the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database

BACKGROUND

Stroke rate and treatment patterns for children with blunt cerebrovascular injury are not well-described. There exists a gap in knowledge of how children with blunt cerebrovascular injury are treated, the stroke rate associated with antithrombotic therapy, and the optimal time to start treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was conducted from 2016 to 2022 for children with blunt injury (<18 years) with blunt cerebrovascular injury. Analysis of all children with blunt cerebrovascular injury and subgroups of children without traumatic brain injury, as well as those without contraindications to antithrombotic therapy (no traumatic brain injury, solid-organ injury, or blood transfusion within 24 hours) was performed. Stroke rate and treatment patterns were compared between age groups (0-6, 7-11, 12-14, 15-17 years) and injury grades.

RESULTS

Among 685,631 blunt injured children, 2,336 incurred blunt cerebrovascular injury (0.34%). Stroke rate was greatest in the youngest patients (6.2% 0-6 years; 2.0% 7-11 years) who had the lowest rates of antithrombotic therapy. Fifty-two percent of patients received no antithrombotic therapy during their hospitalization. Children who received antithrombotic therapy had greater rates of stroke compared with those untreated (6.1% vs 2.1%, P < .001) regardless of age group. Low-molecular weight heparin was the most common antithrombotic therapy (28.2%) followed by heparin (14.2%), and aspirin (5.1%).

CONCLUSION

Children aged 0-11 years had the greatest rates of stroke and were least likely to receive antithrombotic therapy. More than one half of children did not receive antithrombotic therapy. Patients who received antithrombotic therapy had greater stroke rates than untreated patients, which may reflect antithrombotic therapy given after stroke occurred. Treatment guidelines are needed for children with blunt cerebrovascular injury.

Cost Effectiveness of Pediatric Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening: A Decision Tree Analysis

BACKGROUND

Early identification of blunt cerebrovascular injury in the pediatric (<18 years) population (pBVCI) is essential to minimize stroke. However, the most cost-effective screening strategy for pBCVI is unknown, and there is high variability in practice nationwide. We sought to identify the most cost-effective screening strategy for identifying pBCVI and hypothesized that Memphis criteria (MC) would be the most cost-effective due to its high sensitivity.

STUDY DESIGN

A Decision Tree analysis model was used to compare the following BCVI screening strategies in peds: (1) no screening (NS); (2) Denver criteria (DC); (3) Expanded Denver criteria (eDC); (4) MC; (5) McGovern criteria (MG); (6) Utah criteria (UC); and (7) universal screening (US). The model considered a range of pBCVI incidences (0.2-2.7 %) and analyzed costs and utilities over a 5-year time horizon. pBCVI cases detected by screening modalities were assumed to be given antithrombotic therapy which mitigates the risk of stroke and mortality.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that at low pBCVI incidences, UC was most cost-saving per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) compared to NS, while MC yielded the highest savings at high incidences compared to MG. Sensitivity analyses indicated the cost-effectiveness of screening strategies varied significantly with pBCVI incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness of pBCVI screening is contingent upon accurate incidence rates, with no one-size-fits-all solution. Pediatric trauma centers should tailor their screening strategies to local pBCVI rates to enhance cost-efficiency and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to better define BCVI incidence rates in children to inform these decisions.

TYPE OF STUDY

Clinical Research Paper.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Cord Injury Management: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4o and Google Gemini Against American College of Surgeons Best Practices Guidelines for Spine Injury

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative Analysis.

OBJECTIVES

The American College of Surgeons developed the 2022 Best Practice Guidelines to provide evidence-based recommendations for managing spinal injuries. This study aims to assess the concordance of ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced with the 2022 ACS Best Practice Guidelines, offering the first expert evaluation of these models in managing spinal cord injuries.

METHODS

The 2022 ACS Trauma Quality Program Best Practices Guidelines for Spine Injury were used to create 52 questions based on key clinical recommendations. These were grouped into informational (8), diagnostic (14), and treatment (30) categories and posed to ChatGPT-4o and Google Gemini Advanced. Responses were graded for concordance with ACS guidelines and validated by a board-certified spine surgeon.

RESULTS

ChatGPT was concordant with ACS guidelines on 38 of 52 questions (73.07%) and Gemini on 36 (69.23%). Most non-concordant answers were due to insufficient information. The models disagreed on 8 questions, with ChatGPT concordant in 5 and Gemini in 3. Both achieved 75% concordance on clinical information; Gemini outperformed on diagnostics (78.57% vs 71.43%), while ChatGPT had higher concordance on treatment questions (73.33% vs 63.33%).

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced demonstrate potential as valuable assets in spinal injury management by providing responses aligned with current best practices. The marginal differences in concordance rates suggest that neither model exhibits a superior ability to deliver recommendations concordant with validated clinical guidelines. Despite LLMs increasing sophistication and utility, existing limitations currently prevent them from being clinically safe and practical in trauma-based settings.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Trauma

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with vascular trauma with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the optimal management strategy.

METHODS

The guidelines are based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to the ESVS evidence grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III, and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 105 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: general principles for vascular trauma care and resuscitation including technical skill sets, bleeding control and restoration of perfusion, graft materials, and imaging; management of vascular trauma in the neck, thoracic aorta and thoracic outlet, abdomen, and upper and lower extremities; post-operative considerations after vascular trauma; and paediatric vascular trauma. In addition, unresolved vascular trauma issues and the patients' perspectives are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS clinical practice guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, evidence based advice to clinicians on the management of vascular trauma.

Diagnosis and management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are not as rare as they were once thought to be-but they still have the same potential for disastrous outcomes. They may occur following any trauma, but more common with higher energy transfer mechanisms. If stroke occurs, prompt recognition and treatment offers the best chance for optimal outcome. Early diagnosis and provision of antithrombotic therapy may prevent strokes, so screening of asymptomatic patients is recommended. Herein we will present what you need to know to diagnose and manage blunt cerebrovascular injury.

Traumatic Cervical Cerebrovascular Injury and the Role of CTA: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Traumatic cerebrovascular injury (CVI) involving the cervical carotid and vertebral arteries is rare but can lead to stroke, hemodynamic compromise, and mortality in the absence of early diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis of both blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) and penetrating CVI is based on cerebrovascular imaging. The most commonly used screening criteria for BCVI include the expanded Denver criteria and the Memphis criteria, each providing varying thresholds for subsequent imaging. Neck CTA has supplanted catheter-based digital subtraction angiography as the preferred screening modality for CVI in patients with trauma. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes the current state of CTA-based cervical imaging in trauma. We review the most common screening criteria for BCVI, discuss BCVI grading scales that are based on neck CTA, describe the diagnostic performance of CTA in the context of other imaging modalities and evolving treatment strategies, and provide a practical guide for neck CTA implementation.

The effect of circle of willis anatomy and scanning practices on outcomes for blunt cerebrovascular injuries

BACKGROUND

Limited research has explored the effect of Circle of Willis (CoW) anatomy among blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) on outcomes. It remains unclear if current BCVI screening and scanning practices are sufficient in identification of concomitant COW anomalies and how they affect outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adult traumatic BCVIs at 17 level I-IV trauma centers (08/01/2017-07/31/2021). The objectives were to compare screening criteria, scanning practices, and outcomes among those with and without COW anomalies.

RESULTS

Of 561 BCVIs, 65% were male and the median age was 48 y/o. 17% (n = 93) had a CoW anomaly. Compared to those with normal CoW anatomy, those with CoW anomalies had significantly higher rates of any strokes (10% vs. 4%, p = 0.04), ICHs (38% vs. 21%, p = 0.001), and clinically significant bleed (CSB) before antithrombotic initiation (14% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001), respectively. Compared to patients with a normal CoW, those with a CoW anomaly also had ischemic strokes more often after antithrombotic interruption (13% vs. 2%, p = 0.02).Patients with CoW anomalies were screened significantly more often because of some other head/neck indication not outlined in BCVI screening criteria than patients with normal CoW anatomy (27% vs. 18%, p = 0.04), respectively. Scans identifying CoW anomalies included both the head and neck significantly more often (53% vs. 29%, p = 0.0001) than scans identifying normal CoW anatomy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While previous studies suggested universal scanning for BCVI detection, this study found patients with BCVI and CoW anomalies had some other head/neck injury not identified as BCVI scanning criteria significantly more than patients with normal CoW which may suggest that BCVI screening across all patients with a head/neck injury may improve the simultaneous detection of CoW and BCVIs. When screening for BCVI, scans including both the head and neck are superior to a single region in detection of concomitant CoW anomalies. Worsened outcomes (strokes, ICH, and clinically significant bleeding before antithrombotic initiation) were observed for patients with CoW anomalies when compared to those with a normal CoW. Those with a CoW anomaly experienced strokes at a higher rate than patients with normal CoW anatomy specifically when antithrombotic therapy was interrupted. This emphasizes the need for stringent antithrombotic therapy regimens among patients with CoW anomalies and may suggest that patients CoW anomalies would benefit from more varying treatment, highlighting the need to include the CoW anatomy when scanning for BCVI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.

Prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following blunt cerebrovascular injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) includes carotid and/or vertebral artery injury following trauma, and conveys an increased stroke risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive summary of prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following BCVI.

METHODS

We searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from January 1946 to June 2023. We identified studies reporting associations between patient or injury factors and risk of stroke following BCVI. We performed meta-analyses of odds ratios (ORs) using the random effects method and assessed individual study risk of bias using the QUIPS tool. We separately pooled adjusted and unadjusted analyses, highlighting the estimate with the higher certainty.

RESULTS

We included 26 cohort studies, involving 20,458 patients with blunt trauma. The overall incidence of stroke following BCVI was 7.7 %. Studies were predominantly retrospective cohorts from North America and included both carotid and vertebral artery injuries. Diagnosis of BCVI was most commonly confirmed with CT angiography. We demonstrated with moderate to high certainty that factors associated with increased risk of stroke included carotid artery injury (as compared to vertebral artery injury, unadjusted odds ratio [uOR] 1.94, 95 % CI 1.62 to 2.32), Grade III Injury (as compared to grade I or II) (uOR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.88 to 3.20), Grade IV injury (uOR 3.09, 95 % CI 2.20 to 4.35), polyarterial injury (uOR 3.11 (95 % CI 2.05 to 4.72), occurrence of hypotension at the time of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.32, 95 % CI 0.87 to 2.03) and higher total body injury severity (aOR 5.91, 95 % CI 1.90 to 18.39).

CONCLUSION

Local anatomical injury pattern, overall burden of injury and flow dynamics contribute to BCVI-related stroke risk. These findings provide the foundational evidence base for risk stratification to support clinical decision making and further research.

Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Are We Overscreening Low-Mechanism Trauma?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Screening patients with trauma for blunt cerebrovascular injury with neck CTA is a common practice, but there remains disagreement regarding which patients should be screened. We reviewed adult blunt cerebrovascular injury data from a level 1 trauma center to investigate whether screening is warranted in low-mechanism trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all neck CTAs performed on adult trauma patients in the emergency department during the 2019 calendar year. Clinical and imaging risk factors for blunt cerebrovascular injury, trauma mechanism, initial neck CTA interpretations, results from subsequent CTA and DSA studies, antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments, and outcome data were recorded.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred thirty-six neck CTAs met the inclusion criteria, of which 965 (85%) were interpreted as having negative findings; 125, as having indeterminate findings (11%); and 46, as having positive findings (4%). Review of subsequent imaging and clinical documentation led to classification of 40 indeterminate studies (32%) as true-positives and 85 (68%) as false-positives. Blunt cerebrovascular injury was identified in 77 (12.6%) cases meeting and in 9 (1.7%) cases not meeting the expanded Denver criteria. The subset of 204 low-mechanism trauma cases (ground-level falls, blunt assaults, and low-impact motor vehicle collisions) not meeting the expanded Denver criteria (18% of the entire data set) could have been excluded from screening with 1 questionable injury and 0 ischemic strokes missed and 12 false-positive cases prevented.

CONCLUSIONS

We advocate reservation of blunt cerebrovascular injury screening in low-mechanism trauma for patients meeting the expanded Denver criteria. Further research is needed to determine the behavior of indeterminate cases and to establish criteria for separating true-positive from false-positive findings.

[Endovascular Treatment for Head and Neck Trauma]

Trauma to the head and neck region can have serious consequences for vital organs such as the brain, and injuries to blood vessels can cause permanent neurological damage or even death. Thus, prompt treatment of head and neck vessels is crucial. Although the level of evidence is moderate, an increasing amount of research indicates that endovascular treatments can be a viable alternative to traditional surgery or medical management. Embolization or reconstructive endovascular procedures can significantly improve patient outcomes. This article provides an overview of various endovascular options available for specific clinical scenarios, along with examples of cases in which they were employed.

Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Screening for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: A Markov Analysis

BACKGROUND

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after blunt trauma. Numerous screening strategies exist, although which is used is institution- and physician-dependent. We sought to identify the most cost-effective screening strategy for BCVI, hypothesizing that universal screening would be optimal among the screening strategies studied.

STUDY DESIGN

A Markov decision analysis model was used to compare the following screening strategies for identification of BCVI: (1) no screening; (2) Denver criteria; (3) extended Denver criteria; (4) Memphis criteria; and (5) universal screening. The base-case scenario modeled 50-year-old patients with blunt traumatic injury excluding isolated extremity injures. Patients with BCVI detected on imaging were assumed to be treated with antithrombotic therapy, subsequently decreasing risk of stroke and mortality. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed on key model inputs. A single-year horizon was used with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

RESULTS

The most cost-effective screening strategy for patients with blunt trauma among the strategies analyzed was universal screening. This method resulted in the lowest stroke rate, mortality, and cost, and highest quality-adjusted life-year. An estimated 3,506 strokes would be prevented annually as compared with extended Denver criteria (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $71,949 for universal screening vs incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,736 for extended Denver criteria per quality-adjusted life-year gained) if universal screening were implemented in the US. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, universal screening was the optimal strategy when the incidence of BCVI was greater than 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

This model suggests universal screening may be the cost-effective strategy for BCVI screening in blunt trauma for certain trauma centers. Trauma centers should develop institutional protocols that take into account individual BCVI rates.

Predictors of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury, Stroke, and Mortality in Patients with Cervical Spine Trauma

BACKGROUND

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI), defined as blunt traumatic injury to the carotid or vertebral arteries, is associated with significant risk of stroke and mortality. Cervical spine trauma is a recognized risk factor for BCVI.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify significant predictors of BCVI and its sequelae in patients with known cervical spine injury.

METHODS

Patients from 2007 to 2018 with blunt cervical spine injury diagnoses were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient baseline and injury characteristics associated with BCVI, stroke, and mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 229,254 patients with cervical spine injury due to blunt trauma. The overall rate of BCVI was 1.6%. Factors associated with BCVI in patients with cervical spine injury included lower Glasgow Coma Scale, motor vehicle crash, higher Injury Severity Score, concomitant traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, and current smoking status. BCVI was a strong predictor of stroke (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 5.7-12.0) and was associated with mortality (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). Stroke occurred in 3.3% of patients with BCVI versus 0.02% for patients without BCVI.

CONCLUSIONS

While BCVI is rare following cervical spine injury due to blunt trauma, it is a significant predictor of stroke and mortality. The risk factors associated with BCVI, stroke, and mortality identified here should be used in the development of more effective predictive tools to improve care.

Emergent neurovascular imaging in patients with blunt traumatic injuries

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) are commonly encountered after blunt trauma. Given the increased risk of stroke incurred after BCVI, it is crucial that they are promptly identified, characterized, and treated appropriately. Current screening practices generally consist of computed tomography angiography (CTA), with escalation to digital subtraction angiography for higher-grade injuries. Although it is quick, cost-effective, and readily available, CTA suffers from poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. A review of the current literature was conducted to examine the current state of emergent imaging for BCVI. After excluding reviews, irrelevant articles, and articles exclusively available in non-English languages, 36 articles were reviewed and included in the analysis. In general, as CTA technology has advanced, so too has detection of BCVI. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with sequences such as vessel wall imaging, double-inversion recovery with black blood imaging, and magnetization prepared rapid acquisition echo have notably improved the utility for MRI in characterizing BCVIs. Finally, transcranial Doppler with emboli detection has proven to be associated with strokes in anterior circulation injuries, further allowing for the identification of high-risk lesions. Overall, imaging for BCVI has benefited from a tremendous amount of innovation, resulting in better detection and characterization of this pathology.

Routine CTA screening identifies blunt cerebrovascular injuries missed by clinical risk factors

Objectives

Current guidelines for screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) are commonly based on the expanded Denver criteria, a set of risk factors that identifies patients who require CT-angiographic (CTA) screening for these injuries. Based on previously published data from our center, we have adopted a more liberal screening guideline than those outlined in the expanded Denver criteria. This entails routine CTA of the neck for all blunt trauma patients already undergoing CT of the cervical spine and/or CTA of the chest. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of patients with BCVI who did not meet any of the risk factors included in the expanded Denver criteria.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with BCVI between June 2014 and December 2019 at a Level I Trauma Center were identified from the trauma registry. Medical records were reviewed for the presence or absence of risk factors as outlined in the expanded Denver criteria. Demographic data, time to CTA and treatment, BCVI grade, Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score were collected.

Results

During the study period, 17 054 blunt trauma patients were evaluated, and 29% (4923) underwent CTA of the neck to screen for BCVI. 191 BCVIs were identified in 160 patients (0.94% of all blunt trauma patients, 3.25% of patients screened with CTA). 16% (25 of 160) of patients with BCVI had none of the risk factors outlined in the Denver criteria.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that reliance on the expanded Denver criteria alone for BCVI screening will result in missed injuries. We recommend CTA screening in all patients with blunt trauma undergoing CT of the cervical spine and/or CTA of the chest to minimize this risk.

Level of evidence

Level III, therapeutic/care management.

Imaging analysis of ischemic strokes due to blunt cerebrovascular injury

BACKGROUND

The timing of stroke onset among patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is not well understood. All blunt trauma patients at our institution undergo a screening computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of the neck. Most patients with CTA evidence of BCVI are treated with aspirin, and all patients with clinical evidence of stroke are treated with aspirin and undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. We conducted a retrospective review to determine the incidence of stroke upon admission and following admission.

METHODS

All neck CTAs and head MRIs obtained in blunt trauma patients were reviewed from August 2017 to August 2019. All CTAs that were interpreted as showing BCVI were individually reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of BCVI. Stroke was defined as brain MRI evidence of new ischemic lesions, and each MRI was reviewed to identify the brain territory affected. We extracted the time to aspirin administration and the timing of stroke onset from patients' electronic health records.

RESULTS

Of the 6,849 blunt trauma patients, 479 (7.0%) had BCVIs. Twenty-four patients (5.0%) with BCVI had a stroke on admission. Twelve (2.6%) of the remaining 455 patients subsequently had a stroke during their hospitalization. The incidence of stroke among patients with BCVI was 7.5%; 2.6% were potentially preventable. Only 5 of the 12 patients received aspirin before the onset of stroke symptoms. All 36 patients with BCVI and stroke had thromboembolic lesions in the territory supplied by an injured vessel.

CONCLUSION

With universal screening, CTA evidence of BCVI is common among blunt trauma patients. Although acute stroke is also relatively common in this population, two thirds of strokes are already evident on admission. One third of BCVI-related strokes occur after admission and often relatively early, necessitating rapid commencement of preventative treatment. Further studies are required to demonstrate the value of antithrombotic administration in preventing stroke in BCVI patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level IV.

Evaluating the Routine Use of Head Computed Tomography Angiography in Blunt Cerebrovascular Trauma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate a protocol change that mandated routine incorporation of head computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the work-up of suspected blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) at an academic Level I trauma center.

METHODS

The BCVI screening guidelines at our institution changed in 2018 to include the addition of a head CTA for all patients receiving a neck CTA as part of our BCVI screening guidelines. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients between 2018 and 2019 who were 18 years or older and met screening criteria for BCVI based on our institutional guidelines. The head CTAs of this cohort were assessed for findings that could potentially alter the course of the patients' treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients fit this criterion and had a head CTA as part of their trauma workup. Findings that could potentially alter a patient's clinical course were identified in 6.6% (n = 21) of the head CTA's. These included decreased arterial perfusion (n = 9), active bleeds (n = 6), vessel occlusions (n = 1), aneurysms (n = 1), and vasospasms (n = 2). Of these 21 patients, 8 had clinically significant findings that affected their course of management (2.5% of total sample). They also had a higher mortality rate and ISS compared to the rest of the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinically suspected BCVI, the addition of head CTA to the existing BCVI screening guideline identified clinically significant vascular abnormalities that affected management in 2.5% of cases.

Isolated basilar artery dissection following blunt trauma challenging the Glasgow coma score: A case report

Blunt cerebrovascular injury is a very rare complication of blunt trauma and a diagnostic challenge. A 14 year old male fell 10 m sustaining multi system trauma. The atypical Glasgow Coma Score was six with a fully preserved eye component. Initial whole-body CT scanning demonstrated multiple injuries but no obvious brain injury. Trauma management involved non-operative resuscitation and was successful, however profound coma occurred and brain stem reflexes disappeared on day two. Repeat brain CT scan demonstrated multiple cerebral and cerebellar ischemic lesions and no opacification of the vertebral or basilar arteries. Secondary analysis of the first CT scan demonstrated a small focal basilar artery dissection not initially reported. Our case report highlights an unusual cause of coma after traumatic brain injury where the clinical scenario mimics locked in syndrome. In such circumstances cerebrovascular injury, and in particular traumatic basilar artery dissection, must be actively excluded.