Intensive physical therapy after emergency laparotomy: Pilot phase of the Incidence of Complications following Emergency Abdominal surgery Get Exercising randomized controlled trial

Key interventions and outcomes in perioperative care pathways in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Emergency laparotomy (EmLap) is a complex clinical arena, delivering time-sensitive, definitive care to a high-risk patient cohort, with significant rates of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Embedding perioperative care pathways within this complex setting has the potential to improve post-operative outcomes, however, requires an in-depth understanding of their design, delivery and outcome assessment. Delivering and implementing complex interventions such as perioperative pathways require transparent reporting with detailed and indepth description of all components during the assessment and evaluation phase. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the current design and reporting of perioperative pathways in the EmLap setting.

METHODS

The OVID SP versions of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched between January 1950 and December 2023. All randomised and non-randomised cohort studies reporting outcomes on perioperative care pathways in adult patients (> 18 years old) undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery were included. A narrative description of all perioperative pathways included was reported to identify design and description of the pathway including the delivery and timing of component interventions. All pathways were evaluated against the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs and 19 non-randomised studies were identified, with most studies considered to be at moderate risk of bias. Twenty-six unique pathways were identified and described, delivering a total of 400 component interventions across 44,055 patients. Component interventions were classified into 24 domains across the perioperative pathway. Twenty studies (66.6%) did not report the TIDieR framework items, with thirteen studies reporting less than 50% of all items. Two hundred and fifty individual outcomes were reported across pathways, with the most commonly reported outcomes related to morbidity, mortality and length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Current perioperative pathways in EmLap setting are underpinned by variable component interventions, with a lack of in-depth intervention reporting and evaluation. Future studies should incorporate the TIDieR checklist when reporting on perioperative pathways in the EmLap setting.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Adverse events related to physiotherapy practice: a scoping review

Introduction

While adverse events related to physiotherapy are possible, the type of adverse event and the area of physiotherapy practice in which they occur are not well understood. The purpose of this scoping review was to establish adverse events related to physiotherapy practice and understand the nature of these events and the circumstances in which they occurred.

Methods

Relevant literature from January 2014 to February 2024 was gathered from five electronic databases. Studies reporting adverse events within any physiotherapy practice (intervention or assessment) were eligible. Two reviewers independently assessed title and abstract, and full texts. Findings were synthesised by clinical streams.

Results

A total of 58 studies met the inclusion criteria. Common adverse events described in musculoskeletal physiotherapy involving manual therapy, exercise and electrotherapy were increased pain and stiffness. Cardiorespiratory physiotherapy interventions involving early mobilisation, exercise and airway clearance therapy reported desaturation and haemodynamic instability. Neurological physiotherapy studies reported falls and fatigue during gait and balance training and exercise. Oncology and aged care interventions involving exercise, balance training and lymphoedema management reported increased pain and muscle strain while studies including pelvic floor muscle training reported the adverse event of vaginal discomfort.

Conclusion

This review identified adverse events occurring during physiotherapy interventions or assessment procedures. Increased monitoring and proactive safety measures may be necessary to ensure patient safety during these treatments.

PHYSIO+++: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial assessing the feasibility of physiotherapist-led non-invasive ventilation for patients with hypoxaemia following abdominal surgery

INTRODUCTION

Few clinical trials have investigated physiotherapy interventions to treat hypoxaemia following abdominal surgery. The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and safety of conducting a clinical trial of physiotherapist-led non-invasive ventilation (NIV).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This single-centre, 50-patient, parallel-group, assessor blinded, pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation will enrol spontaneously ventilating adults with hypoxaemia within 72 hours of major abdominal surgery. Participants will receive either (1) usual care physiotherapy of a single education session (talk), daily walking of 10-15 min (walk) and four sessions of coached deep breathing and coughing (breathe) or (2) usual care physiotherapy plus four 30 min sessions of physiotherapist-led NIV delivered over 2 postoperative days. Primary feasibility and safety outcome measures are; number of eligible patients recruited per week, total time of NIV treatment delivered, acceptability of treatments to patients and clinicians and incidence of adverse events. Secondary feasibility outcomes include measures of recruitment and treatment adherence. Exploratory outcome measures include change in respiratory parameters, postoperative pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, health-related quality of life, postoperative activity levels and mortality.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been obtained from the relevant institution. Results will be published to inform future research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12622000839707.

Nomogram for predicting adhesive small bowel obstruction following emergency gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative adhesions are frequent and significant complications that typically arise following abdominal surgery. Currently, the existing evidence for predicting the risk of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) after emergency gastrointestinal surgery (EGS) remains inadequate. A reliable perioperative model that quantifies the risk of ASBO after EGS serves as a practical tool for guiding individually tailored surveillance.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 1296 patients who underwent EGS for radiologically confirmed bowel/visceral inflammation or perforation between 2012 and 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center were included in this study to establish a best-fit nomogram. The nomogram was externally validated by assessing discrimination and calibration using an independent cohort from a separate medical center.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients (8.9%) developed at least one episode of ASBO after EGS during a median follow-up duration of 26 months. The results of multivariable logistic analysis indicated that male sex (P = 0.043), preoperative albumin level (P = 0.002), history of pelvic radiotherapy (P = 0.038), laparotomy (P = 0.044), and intensive care unit stay ≥ 72 h (P = 0.047) were identified as independent risk factors for developing ASBO. By incorporating these predictors, the developed nomogram exhibited good accuracy in risk estimation, as evidenced by a guide-corrected C-index score of 0.852 (95% CI 0.667-0.920) in the external validation cohort. Decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve demonstrated a clinically effective predictive model.

CONCLUSION

By incorporating the nomogram as a supplemental tool in perioperative management, it becomes possible to accurately assess the individual's likelihood of developing ASBOs. This quantification enables surgeons to implement appropriate preventive measures, ultimately leading to improved outcomes.

Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care

BACKGROUND

This is Part 2 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses intra- and postoperative aspects of care.

METHODS

Experts in aspects of management of high-risk and emergency general surgical patients were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Some ERAS® components covered in other guideline papers are outlined only briefly, with the bulk of the text focusing on key areas pertaining specifically to EL.

RESULTS

Twenty-three components of intraoperative and postoperative care were defined. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi Process.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines are based on best available evidence for an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing EL. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.