Damage control surgery in emergency general surgery: What you need to know

Sepsis management of the acute care surgery patient: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Increasingly, acute care surgeons have taken over the management of general surgery consult patients in the hospital, many of whom present with sepsis and/or in septic shock. In this article, we will discuss the intricacies of sepsis management for acute care surgery. The underlying tenants of sepsis management will be outlined with specific attention to the nuances associated with surgical patients. Ultimately, when a surgical problem is identified, this management will culminate with the need for specific source control - the unique aspect when a surgical as opposed to a medical disease process is the cause of sepsis. However, surgeons must also be competent in the other components of sepsis management including antimicrobial therapy and hemodynamic support. This article is designed for the surgeon or for any provider caring for patients with a potential acute care surgical problem, recognizing that different practice settings will vary with regard to resource availability for laboratory tests, invasive monitoring, diagnostics, and surgeon availability.

ICU imperatives in open abdomen management after trauma or emergency surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is both timely and relevant as the open abdomen approach to manage injury, emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, as well as secondary intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) remain prevalent throughout ICUs.

RECENT FINDINGS

IAH is not limited to those with injury or EGS conditions, as it is increasingly recognized following cardiac surgery as well as cardiac transplantation. IAH monitoring techniques benefit from technological advances including noninvasive devices. Time to primary fascial closure (PFC) is a key determinant of patient-centered outcomes, with worse outcomes in those with delayed or failed closure attempts. Visceral edema avoidance or mitigation techniques remain controversial. Nutrition support and its impact on the gastrointestinal microbiome appear to influence infection risk and anastomotic integrity. Team-based approaches to successful as well as failed open abdomen management help optimize outcomes.

SUMMARY

These findings bear broad implications for intensive care medicine clinicians who care for open abdomen patients, as they address resuscitation, intra-abdominal pressure monitoring, and nutrition support all of which influence the likelihood of achieving PFC - a key goal regardless of whether the abdomen was initially left open after injury, EGS, or intestinal ischemia management.

The acute phase management of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) with polytrauma: A narrative review

Introduction

Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is frequently observed in polytrauma patients.

Research question

What is the optimal strategy to manage tSCI in the setting of polytrauma?

Material and methods

This narrative review focuses on: 1) extraspinal damage control surgery and resuscitation, 2) the perioperative protection of the injured spine during emergency surgery, 3) imaging and timing of spinal surgery in polytrauma, 4) early interventions for skin, bowel and bladder, and 5) the multidisciplinary approach to tSCI polytrauma patients.

Results

Damage control resuscitation (DCR) and damage control surgery (DCS), aim to prevent/correct post-traumatic physiological derangements to minimize bleeding until definitive hemostasis is achieved. Spinal protection during emergency surgery is of paramount importance to reduce secondary insults to the injured spine. Imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful for decision-making regarding surgical management of the injured spine. Early decompressive surgery (within 24 h from trauma) is associated with better neurological outcomes. Early consultation with a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician is beneficial to optimize recovery. A close collaboration between different medical specialties involved in the early management of tSCI patients with polytrauma is advisable to improve outcome.

Discussion and conclusion

This narrative review aims to collate basic knowledge regarding acute phase management of tSCI patients in the context of polytrauma. More evidence and data form well-powered studies are necessary in this setting.

Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for complex pancreaticoduodenal damage with multiple organ injuries following blunt abdominal trauma: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex surgical procedure with significant potential for complications such as pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, intra-abdominal abscesses, and hemorrhage. Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) performed for traumatic injuries carries even greater risks due to the patient's severely unstable condition upon admission. While the literature recommends that EPD be reserved for hemodynamically stable trauma patients, there are scenarios where it may be the last resort to save the patient's life.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old male presented in the emergency department after a collision with a truck. He sustained extensive pancreaticoduodenal deconstruction combined with IVC, liver, right kidney, and right adrenal injuries following blunt abdominal trauma. Despite the patient's hemodynamic instability, the surgical team proceeded with EPD combined with IVC repair, right nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, cholecystectomy, and liver hemostasis. Postoperative complications included biliary leakage and intraabdominal abscess, all of which were successfully conservatively managed.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Upon entering the abdomen, the priority was rapid identification and control of the significant bleeding, particularly from the injured IVC. While additional procedures like nephrectomy and adrenalectomy were required, continued bleeding from the crushed pancreatic head left EPD as the only viable option to save the patient.

CONCLUSION

EPD can be a lifesaving procedure for a small portion of trauma patients with non-reconstructable pancreaticoduodenal injury, even in the setting of hemodynamic instability. However, it should only be performed at high-volume centers and by experienced hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeons.

Gastric rupture caused by intragastric perforation of splenic artery aneurysm: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

The rupture of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm (SAP) is life-threatening disease, often caused by trauma and pancreatitis. SAPs often rupture into the abdominal cavity and rarely into the stomach.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 70-year-old male with no previous medical history was transported to our emergency center with transient loss of consciousness and tarry stools. After admission, the patient become hemodynamically unstable and his upper abdomen became markedly distended. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography performed on admission showed the presence of a splenic artery aneurysm (SAP) at the bottom of a gastric ulcer. Based on the clinical picture and evidence on explorative tests, we established a preliminary diagnosis of ruptured SAP bleeding into the stomach and performed emergency laparotomy. Intraoperative findings revealed the presence of a large intra-abdominal hematoma that had ruptured into the stomach. When we performed gastrotomy at the anterior wall of the stomach from the ruptured area, we found pulsatile bleeding from the exposed SAP; therefore, the SAP was ligated from inside of the stomach, with gauze packing into the ulcer. We temporarily closed the stomach wall and performed open abdomen management, as a damage control surgery (DCS) approach. On the third day of admission, total gastrectomy and splenectomy were performed, and reconstruction surgery was performed the next day. Histopathological studies of the stomach samples indicated the presence of moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Since no malignant cells were found at the rupture site, we concluded that the gastric rupture was caused by increased internal pressure due to the intra-abdominal hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully treated a patient with intragastric rupture of the SAP that was caused by gastric cancer invasion, accompanied by gastric rupture, by performing DCS. When treating gastric bleeding, such rare causes must be considered and appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies should be designed according to the cause of bleeding.

Temporary abdominal closure in oncological patients: Surgical characteristics and implications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In critically ill patients, temporary abdominal closure (TAC) is utilized for conditions like abdominal compartment syndrome risk, gross abdominal contamination, and intestinal loop viability doubts. TAC techniques aim to safeguard abdominal contents, drain intraperitoneal fluids, and minimize fascia and skin damage. Our goal is to outline clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes in oncological patients undergoing peritoneostomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TAC with vacuum therapy at a tertiary oncological center were studied, with data sourced from an institutional database.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (54.3% female), with an average age of 63.1 ± 12.3 years, were included in the study. The primary tumor site was predominantly gastrointestinal (78.2%). Patients presented systemic signs of chronic disease, reflected by a mean body mass index of 18.2 ± 7.6 kg/m², hemoglobin level of 9.2 ± 1.8 g/dL, and albumin level of 2.3 ± 0.6 g/dL. Additionally, most patients had a low-performance status (53% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1/2, 44.8% Karnofsky score ≤80, and 61.2% Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥6). Emergency surgical complications were the main reasons for initial surgery (68%), with the majority attributed to fecal peritonitis (65.9%). Only 14.8% of patients achieved complete abdominal closure with an average of 24.8 days until closure. The in-hospital mortality rate was 85.2%.

CONCLUSION

TAC is an alternative for oncological patients with surgical complications, but it carries a high mortality rate due to the compromised conditions of the patients.

Early management of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in patients with polytrauma: a consensus and clinical recommendations jointly developed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) & the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS)

BACKGROUND

The early management of polytrauma patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a major challenge. Sparse data is available to provide optimal care in this scenario and worldwide variability in clinical practice has been documented in recent studies.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary consensus panel of physicians selected for their established clinical and scientific expertise in the acute management of tSCI polytrauma patients with different specializations was established. The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) endorsed the consensus, and a modified Delphi approach was adopted.

RESULTS

A total of 17 statements were proposed and discussed. A consensus was reached generating 17 recommendations (16 strong and 1 weak).

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus provides practical recommendations to support a clinician's decision making in the management of tSCI polytrauma patients.