Presentations and outcomes in patients with traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a 15-year experience

Characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors in patients with penetrating and blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) is well-known worldwide as rare and life-threatening. However, because no nationwide cohort study of penetrating and blunt TDI has been conducted in Japan and other countries where penetrating trauma is relatively uncommon, the clinical characteristics of all TDI are unknown. We aimed to describe the characteristics of TDI patients, compare penetrating TDI with blunt TDI, and identify mortality risk factors in Japan.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified TDI patients between 2004 and 2019 using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. We extracted data on patient demographics, type of trauma, cause of trauma, physiological parameters, region of concomitant injury, associated injury, and management. We compared penetrating and blunt TDI for each variable. The primary outcome was mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify mortality risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 338,744 patients, 1,147 (0.3%) had TDI, of which 771 were eligible for analysis (excluding 308 in cardiac arrest on arrival). Penetrating TDI represented 29.8% and blunt TDI 70.2%, and comparing penetrating and blunt TDI, the most common cause was self-inflicted (48.7%) vs. accident (85.6%), males were 68.7% vs. 66.0% of the patients (P = 0.50), and the mortality rate was 8.3% vs. 26.4% (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis found that age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.04), Injury Severity Score (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.006-1.06), Revised Trauma Score (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.45-0.67), severe concomitant abdominal injury (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.32-4.56), severe concomitant upper extremity injury (OR 3.38, 95%CI 1.24-9.17) were independent predictors of mortality, and computed tomography (CT) (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.15-0.69) and diaphragm repair (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.25-0.78) were protective factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japan, we found that penetrating TDI was mainly caused by self-injury and the male-female ratio was the same as for blunt TDI, although blunt TDI was much more frequent. TDI was considered highly lethal, with over 25% of patients in cardiac arrest on arrival. Our unique independent predictors were CT, severe concomitant abdominal injury, and severe concomitant upper extremity injury. These findings may help in the management of TDI in countries with less common penetrating trauma.

A Case Series Focusing on Blunt Traumatic Diaphragm Injury at a Level 1 Trauma Center

Introduction: Detection of blunt traumatic diaphragm injury (TDI) can be challenging in the absence of surgical exploration. Our objective is to study the mechanisms of injury and detection modes for patients with blunt TDI. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review conducted in a level 1 trauma center from 2016 to 2023, inclusive. We identified seven patients with blunt TDI using the primary mechanisms and trauma type. Results: Out of seven patients, two were associated with motor vehicle collisions, four were pedestrians struck, and one fell down the stairs. The mean ISS was 48.4 (29-75). Of the seven patients with blunt TDI, four died in the trauma bay-two from traumatic arrest and two died spontaneously. Multiple rib fractures were one of the common injury patterns in six cases, whereas in the remaining case, blunt TDI was confirmed at laparotomy and repaired. One patient died two days after admission. Of the two patients who survived, one had a TDI identified during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for retained hemothorax, and one patient had a TDI repaired during emergent exploratory laparotomy for other injuries. In the remaining four patients, blunt TDI was confirmed based on their autopsy reports. Conclusions: Injuries in all seven cases were sustained with a high-energy injury mechanism. Multiple rib fractures were reported in six cases. Based on our findings, we recommend that clinicians maintain a high level of suspicion for blunt TDI in patients with thoracoabdominal trauma, especially in cases with rib fractures or high-impact trauma.

Diaphragm injuries in a mature trauma system: still a diagnostic challenge

Background

A traumatic diaphragm defect is a rare injury. A missed diaphragm injury may cause serious morbidity and mortality. Detection rate during the first assessment of trauma patients is notoriously low. However, important improvements in imaging modalities were developed. The aim of this study was to analyze traumatic diaphragm injuries in relation to diagnostic tools, therapeutic interventions and outcome over the past two decades.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma patients with traumatic diaphragm injuries between 2000 and 2018 at a level I trauma center. Data collected were baseline characteristics, diagnostics that were performed, treatment given and follow-up.

Results

A total of 47 patients with traumatic diaphragm injuries were evaluated. The majority of injuries was seen following blunt trauma (72%). Mortality was 21%, mainly due to concomitant injuries. One patient died due to the consequences of an unrecognized diaphragm injury. In 29 cases (62%) the injury was diagnosed pre-operatively through imaging, with the remaining being diagnosed during laparotomy. In 11 patients (35%) the diaphragmatic injury was not seen on a pre-operative CT-scan. Postoperative complications occurred in 19 patients, mostly of pulmonary origin (i.e., pneumonia). No recurrences were reported.

Conclusion

This study confirms diaphragm injuries are infrequent injuries, with high mortality. Even more, despite major improvement in diagnostic modalities over the past 2 decades, the algorithm for detection of diaphragmatic injuries has not changed nor has its outcome. Although the incidence is low, since consequences are severe, it is important to have a high index of suspicion in abdominal trauma, even in a non-conclusive CT-scan.

The silent threat: A retrospective study of right-sided traumatic diaphragmatic hernias in a university hospital

Objectives

In hospital attendance, 75% of diaphragmatic hernias occur on left as opposed to 25% on the right side. Right side hernias are associated with abdominal injuries, mainly the liver. However, right-side injuries are frequently underdiagnosed due to the complexity of associated injuries and high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to perform a retrospective analysis of records from our clinical experience to investigate demographics, TM, diagnosis, morbidity, and mortality associated with right sided TDH. These findings may provide insights into improving the clinical management of patients with this serious injury, potentially reducing morbidity and mortality rates.

Material and Methods

Retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients from the trauma database of the Division of Trauma Surgery at University of Campinas in 32-year period was performed. Only records of patients with right sided TDH were included in the analysis.

Results

Blunt trauma was the most common mechanism. Diagnoses were made by laparotomy in eight cases, all these cases were hemodynamically unstable. TDH grade III injury occurred in most cases followed by grade IV. Liver injuries were present in almost all cases, most of them high grade, followed by colon and small bowel. Extra-abdominal associated injuries with a predominance of femur fractures, pelvic fractures and hemothorax. Post-operative complications were associated with length of stay in intensive care unit. Pneumonia was the most frequent complication. The overall mortality rate was 16%.

Conclusion

Most diagnoses were performed through laparotomy and not by radiologic exams, due to hemodynamic instability on admission. There is underdiagnosis of right-side TDH due to the high-energy trauma mechanism with high grade associated injuries and mortality on pre-hospital.

Twenty-year perspective on blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury in level 1 trauma centre: Early versus delayed diagnosis injury patterns and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) is typically associated with severe trauma and concomitant injuries. It is a diagnostic challenge in the setting of blunt trauma and can be easily overlooked especially in the acute phase often dominated by concurrent injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with blunt-TDI identified from a level 1 trauma registry. Variables associated with early versus delayed diagnosis as well as non-survivor and survivor groups were collected to examine factors associated with delayed diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were included (mean age 46 ± 20, 60.6% male). Diagnosis was made <24 h in 126 (81.3%), and >24 h in 29 (18.7%). Of the delayed diagnosis group, 14 (48%) were diagnosed >7 days. Overall, 27 (21.4%) patients had a diagnostic initial CXR and 64 (50.8%) had a diagnostic initial CT. Fifty-eight (37.4%) patients were diagnosed intraoperatively. Of the delayed diagnosis group, 22 (75.9%) had no initial signs on CXR or CT, 15 (52%) of this group had persistent pleural-effusions/elevated-hemidiaphragm leading to further investigation and diagnosis. No significant difference in survival was observed between early and delayed diagnoses, no clinically significant injury patterns to predict delayed diagnoses were noted.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of TDI is challenging. Without frank signs of herniation of abdominal contents on CXR or CT, the diagnosis is often not made on initial imaging. In patients with the evidence of blunt traumatic injury in the lower-chest/upper-abdomen, a high degree of clinical suspicion should be held and follow-up CXRs/CTs arranged.

Strangulated Gastric Hernia Following a Missed Traumatic Diaphragmatic Injury: A Case Report

Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries (TDIs) are rare and can be life-threatening, depending on the size of the injury and the contents herniating through it. They usually result from blunt or penetrating trauma to the thoracoabdominal area, with an incidence of 0.8-5% and up to 30% presenting late. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating patients with a history of trauma (severe blunt or thoracoabdominal penetrating trauma) and upper abdominal symptoms. We present a case of a missed TDI after a left posterior thoracoabdominal stab injury, which was evaluated with a diagnostic laparoscopy at an outside hospital. He presented to our emergency department (ED) with sudden onset left-sided chest pain and uncontrollable vomiting. A CT scan was obtained and showed a distended stomach herniating through a defect in the left hemidiaphragm. The patient was immediately taken for laparoscopic exploration and repair. There was a 5 cm defect in the left posterolateral diaphragm containing a strangulated stomach (approximately ⅔) and necrotic omentum. Complete reduction was achieved and the diaphragmatic defect was repaired primarily. His postoperative course was uncomplicated. This case illustrates the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for TDI, despite reports of previous exploration. Missed TDI can present with herniated intra-abdominal organs, which can become strangulated and increase morbidity and mortality.

The edemiological state of blunt diaphragmatic injury: An analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

Little is known about blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury (BTDI). This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological state of BTDI, using a nationwide trauma registry in Japan.

METHODS

Data of patients aged ≥18 years who experienced blunt injury between January 2004 and May 2019 were extracted from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. Demographics, cause of trauma, mechanism of injury, physiological parameters, organ injuries, and bone fractures were compared between patients with and those without BTDI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with BTDI.

RESULTS

A total of 305,141 patients from 244 hospitals were analyzed. The median patient age (interquartile range) was 65 (44-79) years, and 185,750 (60.9%) were men. BTDI was diagnosed in 868 patients (0.3%). The prevalence of BTDI was stable, between 0.2 and 0.6%, over the study period. Among the 868 patients with BTDI, 408 (47.0%) fatalities were recorded. Mortality rates in each year were 42.5-68.2%, with no significant trend toward an improved outcome (P = 0.925). Our multivariable logistic regression analysis found that mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score (9-12 or 3-8) on hospital arrival, hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) on hospital arrival, organ injuries (lung, heart, spleen, bladder, kidney, pancreas, stomach, and liver), and bone fractures (rib, pelvis, lumbar spine, and upper extremities) were independently associated with BTDI.

CONCLUSION

Using a nationwide trauma registry, this study revealed the epidemiological state of BTDI in Japan. BTDI was found to be a very rare but devastating injury, with high in-hospital mortality. Some clinical factors, such as mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score, organ injuries, and bone fractures, were independently associated with BTDI.

Predictors of Mortality in Blunt Cardiac Injury: A Nationwide Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Blunt thoracic injury (BTI) is one of the most common causes of trauma admission in the United States and is uncommonly associated with cardiac injuries. Blunt cardiac injury (BCI) after blunt thoracic trauma is infrequent but carries a substantial risk of morbidity and sudden mortality. Our study aims to identify predictors of concomitant cardiac contusion among BTI patients and the predictors of mortality among patients presenting with BCI on a national level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a 1-y (2017) analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adults (aged ≥ 18 y) with the diagnosis of BTI. We excluded patients who were transferred, had a penetrating mechanism of injury, and who were dead on arrival. Our primary outcomes were the independent predictors of concomitant cardiac contusions among BTI patients and the predictors of mortality among BCI patients. Our secondary outcome measures were in-hospital complications, differences in injury patterns, and injury severity between the survivors and nonsurvivors of BCI.

RESULTS

A total of 125,696 patients with BTI were identified, of which 2368 patients had BCI. Mean age was 52 ± 20 y, 67% were male, and median injury severity score was 14 [9-21]. The most common type of cardiac injury was cardiac contusion (43%). Age ≥ 65 y, higher 4-h packed red blood cell requirements, motor vehicle collision mechanism of injury, and concomitant thoracic injuries (hemothorax, flail chest, lung contusion, sternal fracture, diaphragmatic injury, and thoracic aortic injuries) were independently associated with concomitant cardiac contusion among BTI patients (P value < 0.05). Age ≥ 65 y, thoracic aortic injury, diaphragmatic injury, hemothorax, and a history of congestive heart failure were independently associated with mortality in BCI patients (P value < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of concomitant cardiac contusion among BTI patients and mortality among BCI patients were identified. Guidelines on the management of BCI should incorporate these predictors for timely identification of high-risk patients.

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: epidemiology, associated injuries, and outcome-an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture is a rare injury in the severely injured patient and is most commonly caused by blunt mechanisms. However, penetrating mechanisms can also dominate depending on regional and local factors. Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture is difficult to diagnose and can be missed by primary diagnostic procedures in the resuscitation room. Initially not life-threatening, diaphragmatic ruptures can cause severe sequelae in the patient's long-term course if untreated. The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiology, associated injuries, and outcome of traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures based on a multicenter registry-based analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from all patients enrolled in the TraumaRegister DGU® between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. That multicenter database collects data on prehospital, intra-hospital emergency, intensive care therapy, and discharge. Included were all patients with a Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) score of 3 or above and patients with a MAIS score of 2 who died or were treated in the intensive care unit, for whom standard documentation forms had been completed and who had sustained a diaphragmatic rupture (AIS score of 3 or 4). The data has been analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test or Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Of the 199,933 patients included in the study population, 687 patients (0.3%) had a diaphragmatic rupture. Of these, 71.9% were male. The mean patient age was 46.1 years. Blunt trauma accounted for 73.5% of the injuries. Primary diagnosis was established in the resuscitation room in 93.1% of the patients. Multislice helical computed tomography (MSCT) was performed in 82.7% of the cases. Rib fractures were detected in 60.7% of the patients with a diaphragmatic injury. Patients with diaphragmatic rupture had a higher mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) than patients without a diaphragmatic injury (32.9 vs. 18.6) and a higher mortality rate (13.2% vs. 9.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the literature, primary diagnostic procedures in the resuscitation room detected relevant diaphragmatic ruptures (AIS ≥ 3) in more than 90% of the patients in our study population. In addition, complex associated serial rib fractures are an important diagnostic indicator.

Factors Associated with Traumatic Diaphragmatic Rupture among Patients with Chest or Abdominal Injury: A Nationwide Study from Japan

Background: Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is a rare condition that is seen in patients with blunt thoracoabdominal trauma. However, factors that are associated with blunt TDR have not been fully revealed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors that are associated with blunt TDR in trauma patients with a chest or abdominal injury using nationwide trauma registry data in Japan. Method: This study was a retrospective observational study with a 15-year study period from 2004 to 2018. We included trauma patients with a chest or abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score of two or more. We evaluated the relationship between confounding factors such as mechanism of injury and blunt TDR with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: This study included 65,110 patients, of whom 496 patients (0.8%) suffered blunt TDR. Factors that were associated with blunt TDR were disturbance of consciousness (adjusted OR [AOR]: 1.639, 95% CI: 1.326–2.026), FAST positive (AOR: 2.120, 95% CI: 1.751–2.567), front seat passenger (AOR: 1.748, 95% CI: 1.129–2.706), and compression injury by heavy object (AOR: 1.677, 95% CI: 1.017–2.765). Conclusion: This study revealed several factors that are associated with blunt TDR. The results of this study may be useful for clinicians when estimating blunt TDR.

Laparotomy management of diaphragmatic and hollow viscera rupture combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair after a traffic accident: A case report

Introduction

Road traffic incidents are the most common cause of multiple organ trauma in low- and middle-income countries. Multiple blunt intra-abdominal organs that rupture in conjunction with a ruptured aorta are terrible and rare.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old man sustained critical injuries during a traffic collision between a motorcycle and truck. The Injury Severity Score was 42 points,. After open abdominal exploration, we repaired the left diaphragmatic rupture with a 13-cm-long tear of IV grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma), resected partial small bowel, simple suture of the transverse colon, and Hartmann procedure in the descending colon. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed 22 h after laparotomy. Reconstruction of the head depicting a cheekbone fracture and inferior to the left orbital bone was performed on the 14th day. The patients survived and were discharged from the hospital, at 22 days without morbidity or mortality.

Discussion

Diaphragmatic rupture provides a signal to relate head, thoracic, and abdominal blunt trauma. If the patient sustains more serious life-threatening injuries that require emergency laparotomy or craniotomy, and aortic repair may be delayed. Laparotomy is the best initial surgical method in this case. TEVAR is a feasible and gold standard procedure for the treatment of patients with the necessary indications.

Conclusion

It is essential to evaluate the level of organ damage to properly coordinate the specialists. The timing of the operation and therapeutic alternatives should be decided for each patient.

•

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) provides a signal to relate head, thoracic, and abdominal injuries.

•

Multiple blunt intra-abdominal organs ruptured in conjunction with a ruptured aorta are terrible and rare traumas.

•

Laparotomy is the best initial method and TEVAR is feasible for hemodynamically stable patients.

Blunt Trauma Associated With Bilateral Diaphragmatic Rupture: A Case Report

Background: A bilateral diaphragmatic rupture is a rare event that occurs in cases of blunt thoracic-abdominal trauma. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 56-year-old female patient with pelvic fracture and second-stage bilateral rupture of the diaphragm due to a car accident. After a chest and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan, the patient underwent emergency suturing of the left hemidiaphragm. On postoperative day (POD) 4, a CT scan performed due to the sudden onset of dyspnea revealed rupture of the right hemidiaphragm, which was not detected on the preoperative CT scan. On POD 9, the right hemidiaphragm was repaired with mesh during a right thoracotomy. The patient recovered 14 days after surgery. However, the postoperative course was complicated by an asymptomatic COVID-19 infection that significantly delayed her discharge from the hospital. Conclusions: Difficulties in preoperative diagnosis and treatment, together with the lack of data in the literature, make this type of trauma a challenge for all acute care and general surgeons.

Open versus laparoscopic repair of traumatic diaphragmatic injury: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgical techniques have become routinely applied in the evaluation and treatment of patients with isolated traumatic diaphragmatic injuries (TDI). However, there remains a paucity of data that compares the laparoscopic repair to the open repair approach. The aim of our study is to examine patient outcomes between TDI patients managed laparoscopically versus those managed using open repair.

METHODS

Adult (age ≥18 years) trauma patients presenting with TDI that required surgical repair were identified in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database 2017. Patients were excluded if they underwent any other surgical procedure of the abdomen or chest. Patients were then stratified into 2 groups based on the surgical approach: laparoscopic repair of the diaphragm versus open repair. Propensity-score matching in a 1:2 ratio was performed. Primary outcome measures were in-hospital major complications and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 177 adult trauma patients who had a laparoscopic repair of their isolated diaphragmatic injury were matched to 354 patients who had an open repair. Mean age was 35 ± 16 years, 78% were male, and mean BMI was 27 ± 7 kg/m². 67 percent of the patients had penetrating injuries, and the median ISS was 17 [9-21]. CT imaging was done in 67% of the patients, with 71% presenting with left-sided injury and 21% having visceral herniation. Conversion from laparoscopic to open was reported in 7.3% of the cases. Patients with a laparoscopic repair had significantly lower rates of major complications (5.6 versus 14.4%; P<0.001), shorter hospital LOS (6 [3-9] versus 9 [5-13] days; P<0.001) and ICU LOS (3 [2-7] versus 5 [2-10] days; P<0.001). No difference was found in rates of in-hospital mortality (0.6 versuss 2.0%; P = 0.129) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of traumatic diaphragmatic injury was associated with decreased morbidity and a shorter hospital course, with a low conversion rate to open repair. Future studies remain necessary to further explore the long-term outcomes of patients with such injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic.

Impact of laparoscopy on the perioperative outcome of penetrating abdominal trauma management during the post revolution period

BACKGROUND

Penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) poses a significant challenge to trauma surgeons. Laparotomy is still the most popular procedure for managing PAT but has high morbidity and mortality rates. Presently, laparoscopy aims to provide equal or superior visualization compared to open approaches but with less morbidity, postoperative discomfort, and recovery time. The aim of this research is to assess the impact of laparoscopy on the management of PAT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study carried out at the Emergency Hospital of Mansoura University/Egypt and at King Faisal Medical Complex, Taif/KSA from September 2014 to September 2018. All hemodynamically stable patients with PAT who were managed by laparoscopy were included in this study. Data extracted for analysis included demographic information, criteria of abdominal stabs, type of management, and perioperative outcome.

RESULTS

Forty patients were recruited in this research and the male-to-female ratio was 5.6:1. The mean age of the patients was 31.4 ± 12.318 years. During the laparoscopic procedure, no peritoneal penetration was observed in 4 patients (negative laparoscopy), while peritoneal penetration was observed in the remaining 36 patients. No visceral injuries were noted in 2 patients of the 36 patients with peritoneal penetration, while the remaining 34 patients had intra-abdominal injuries.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy performed on hemodynamically stable trauma patients was found to be safe and technically feasible. It also reduced negative and non-therapeutic laparotomies and offered paramount therapeutic and diagnostic advantages for traumatic diaphragmatic injuries.

Mechanism of injury, injury patterns and associated injuries in patients operated for chest wall trauma

PURPOSE

Chest wall injuries are common in blunt trauma and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the most common mechanisms of injury (MOI), injury patterns, and associated injuries in patients who undergo surgery for chest wall trauma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of trauma patients with multiple rib fractures and unstable thoracic cage injuries who were managed surgically at Sahlgrenska University Hospital during the period September 2010-September 2017. The MOI, injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), thoracic and associated injuries were recorded. Patients were categorized according to age (years): groups I (15‒44), II (45‒64) and III ( > 64). Unstable thoracic cage injuries were classified as sternal, anterior, lateral and posterior flail chest.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eleven trauma patients with a mean age (years) of 58.2 ± 15.6, mean ISS 23.6 ± 11.0, and mean NISS 34.1 ± 10.6 were included in the study. Traffic accidents were the most common MOI in Group I (62%) and falls in Group III (59%). The most common flail segments were lateral and posterior. Sternal and anterior flail segments were more common with bilateral injuries and traffic accidents, particularly frontal collisions. Injuries in at least three body regions were also more associated with traffic accidents. Diaphragmatic injury was seen in 18% of patients who underwent thoracotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The MOI associated with multiple rib fractures differs according to the age of the patient and is associated with different chest wall injury patterns and extra-thoracic injuries.

Acute Diaphragmatic Injuries Associated with Traumatic Rib Fractures: Experiences of a Major Trauma Centre and the Importance of Intra-Pleural Assessment

Background

Diaphragmatic injuries following blunt or penetrating thoraco-abdominal trauma are rare, but can be life-threatening. Rib fractures are the most common associated injury in patients with a traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI). We hypothesized that the pattern of rib fracture injuries could dictate the likelihood of acute TDIs.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out between April 2014 and October 2018 to analyze patients with TDIs and rib fractures at a major trauma center in London, United Kingdom.

Results

Over the study period, 1,560 patients had rib fractures, of whom 14 had associated diaphragmatic injuries. Left-sided diaphragmatic injuries were found in 8 patients (57%) . A significant proportion of the rib fractures were located posterolaterally (44.9%). The highest frequency of fractures was found in ribs 5–10, which accounted for 74% of all the fractures. Ten patients underwent surgery, of whom 7 were diagnosed with a diaphragmatic injury intraoperatively after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery assessment of the pleural cavity. Two patients died due to severe injuries of other organs and the remaining 2 patients were managed conservatively.

Conclusion

Our series of patients demonstrates a relationship between significant rib fractures and diaphragmatic injuries in trauma patients, and the diagnostic difficulties in identifying the condition. We found that the location of the rib fractures and the pattern of injury in patients with TDIs were much lower and posterolateral in the chest wall without a preference for laterality. We suggest using a thoracoscope in patients undergoing chest wall surgery post-trauma to aid in diagnosing this condition.

Faecopneumothorax due to missing diaphragmatic hernia: a case report

BACKGROUND

Diaphragmatic hernias may occur as either congenital or acquired. The most important cause of acquired diaphragmatic hernias is trauma, and the trauma can be due to blunt or penetrating injury. Diaphragmatic hernia may rarely be seen after thoracoabdominal trauma.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 54-year-old Turkish male patient admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain and dyspnea ongoing for 2 days. He had general abdominal tenderness in all quadrants. He had a history of a stabbing incident in his left subcostal region 3 months ago without any pathological findings in thoracoabdominal computed tomography scan. New thoracoabdominal computed tomography showed a diaphragmatic hernia and fluid in the hernia sac. Due to respiratory distress and general abdominal tenderness, the decision to perform an emergency laparotomy was made. There was a 6 cm defect in the diaphragm. There were also necrotic fluids and stool in the hernia sac in the thorax colon resection, and an anastomosis was performed. The defect in the diaphragm was sutured. The oral regimen was started, and when it was tolerated, the regimen was gradually increased. The patient was discharged on the postoperative 11th day.

CONCLUSIONS

Acquired diaphragmatic hernia may be asymptomatic or may present with complications leading to sepsis. In this report, acquired diaphragmatic hernia and associated colonic perforation of a patient with a history of stab wounds was presented.

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: delayed presentation following a SCUBA dive

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is a rare yet life-threatening occurrence that remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Delayed presentation with associated strangulation of the contents, although uncommon, requires emergent management. A 42-year-old woman presented with constant, severe left-sided shoulder and chest pain, as well as associated upper abdominal pain following a self-contained underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA) dive. A chest radiograph (CXR) and CT showed a left-sided diaphragmatic hernia containing stomach. She subsequently underwent a laparoscopic repair of the diaphragmatic defect and recovered well postoperatively.

Evaluation and management of abdominal stab wounds: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm

This is a recommended management algorithm from the Western Trauma Association addressing the management of adult patients with abdominal stab wounds. Because there is a paucity of published prospective randomized clinical trials that have generated Class I data, these recommendations are based primarily on published observational studies and expert opinion of Western Trauma Association members. The algorithm and accompanying comments represent a safe and sensible approach that can be followed at most trauma centers. We recognize that there will be patient, personnel, institutional, and situational factors that may warrant or require deviation from the recommended algorithm. We encourage institutions to use this as a guideline to develop their own local protocols.

Double traumatic diaphragmatic injury: A case report

•

Diaphragmatic injuries are rare complications from trauma.

•

Bilateral diaphragmatic injuries are extremely rare and just a few cases are reported.

•

Sometimes the diagnosis is delayed or even missed.

•

Both primary repair or mesh repair are safe and feasible.

•

The use of a polypropylene mesh with titanized surface has not been attempted before.

Introduction

Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries are rare complications resulting from a thoracic-abdominal blunt or penetrating trauma. Left-sided diaphragmatic injuries are more commonly reported in literature. Bilateral injuries are extremely rare, occurring in about 3% of the patients and just few cases reported in literature. Traumatic diaphragmatic hernias are definitely a marker of a severe trauma, in fact diaphragmatic injuries are often related to thoracic and abdominal organs injuries. Sometimes the classic clinical signs and symptoms of diaphragmatic injuries may initially not be present so that definitive evaluation is delayed or even missed.

Case report

A 62-years old woman was admitted in Emergency Department after a pedestrian accident. A whole-body CT scan showed multiple fractures (ribs, pelvic and vertebral) but no organ injury. The next CT detected a left-sided posterior diaphragmatic hernia involving transverse colon. Thus we performed an explorative laparoscopy and found a double diaphragmatic injury. A primary repair with non-absorbable sutures and a prosthetic titanized patch was performed.

Diaphragm and transdiaphragmatic injuries

The incidence of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is around 0.5% of all trauma patients, located more frequently on the left side (80%), with penetrating trauma being more predominantly the cause (63%) than blunt injuries (37%). TDR typically develops during thoracoabdominal injuries and outcome depends on the severity of the associated organ lesion. Diagnosis is sometimes very difficult: chest X-ray can verify TDR in only 25-70% of cases, although the specificity of a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is 100% and 83% for left and right-sided ruptures, respectively. When TDR is a part of a polytrauma, the management of the patient must follow the ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support) protocol and surgery is rarely based on the primary survey. The usual scenario involves cases detected during the secondary survey. In acute cases approach is determined by the site of the life-threatening injuries. In the daily surgical routine, in cases of acute TDR, laparotomy provides the best approach to manage the associated abdominal injuries and diaphragmatic rupture. Alternatively a transthoracic approach offer access to reconstruction in cases of delayed. A transdiaphragmatic procedure is offered when during an exploration (laparotomy or thoracotomy), any sign of an injury (bleeding, perforation) is verified through the rupture of the diaphragm in the other cavity (abdomen or chest and vice versa): the injury via a transdiaphragmatic way can be managed. Usually, a simple and small rupture up to 5-6 cm can be reconstructed with No. 0 or 1 monofilament non-absorbable or absorbable interrupted sutures, while for larger defects, interrupted figure-of-eight or horizontal mattress sutures are required. Mesh prosthesis is rarely needed.

Relevance of early CT scan diagnosis of blunt diaphragmatic injury: A retrospective analysis from the Northern French Alps Emergency Network

INTRODUCTION

Diaphragmatic rupture following blunt trauma occurs rarely. Classically described after high-velocity accidents, ruptures are often associated with multiple organ injuries. The diagnosis is sometimes difficult. The goal of this study was to analyze and to discuss the modalities of early radiologic diagnosis and management of these injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients seen between 2009 and 2017 within the Northern Alpine Emergency Network [REseau Nord Alpin des Urgences (RENAU)]. Clinical, radiologic and surgical data from all patients sustaining blunt diaphragmatic rupture were studied.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (18 men and 13 women), median age 44, were included. The principle mechanism of injury was road or traffic accidents for 22 patients. Diaphragmatic rupture occurred on the left side in 23 patients. Diagnosis was delayed in two patients, at 11 days and three months after the initial accident. Chest X-rays were diagnostic in 18 of 29 patients. CT scan was the reference investigation since it was performed in all patients and confirmed the diagnosis in 26 instances. Repair was surgical via a midline laparotomy in 27 patients, via laparoscopy in three, and via thoracoscopy in one. Three patients died.

CONCLUSION

At urgent surgical exploration in the unstable blunt trauma patient, the surgeon should keep in mind the relatively poor diagnostic performance of chest X-rays. Accurate diagnosis relies on routine inspection of the diaphragmatic cupolas. In the stable trauma victim, contrast-enhanced abdomino-thoracic CT with reconstruction can lead to early diagnosis, which allows for repair under optimal conditions, whether by laparotomy, laparoscopy or thoracoscopy, according to local conditions and expertise.

Massive hemothorax due to two bleeding sources with minor injury mechanism: a case report

Background

Massive hemothorax resulting from a minor injury mechanism is considered to be rare particularly when the diaphragm is injured. We report a case of massive hemothorax with bleeding from the intercostal artery and diaphragmatic damage caused by minor blunt trauma.

Case presentation

An 83-year-old Japanese man was transported to our hospital 3 hours after falling out of bed. Computed tomography revealed hemothorax and multiple rib fractures. He underwent fluid resuscitation and a tube thoracostomy, but he became hemodynamically unstable. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed worsening hemothorax with contrast extravasation 4 hours after arrival at the hospital. Emergency angiography indicated hemorrhage in the area supplied by the tenth intercostal artery. Transcatheter arterial embolization stabilized his vital signs for a short period. However, further hemodynamic stabilization required a thoracotomy, which revealed diaphragmatic trauma, which was removed and sutured before fixing his fractured ribs. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation without complications on hospital day 29.

Conclusions

Minor mechanisms of blunt trauma can cause rib fractures and massive hemothorax. Traumatic diaphragm injury should be considered a differential diagnosis if hemodynamic instability persists after transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with lower level rib fractures.

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: Single-center experience with 38 patients

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (BTDR) is uncommon, but is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to present our experience with management of this injury. Medical records of 38 patients with BTDR who were treated in our hospital from January 2001 to June 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The sex, age, cause of injury, location of rupture, mode of diagnosis, time to diagnosis, the presence of herniation and bowel perforation, the presence of preoperative shock and intubation, Injury Severity Score (ISS), associated injuries, comorbidity, the operative procedure, morbidity and mortality, and the predictive factors affecting the outcome of BTDR were evaluated. There were 32 men (84.2%) and 6 women (15.8%) with a mean age of 51.2 years (range 18-84 years). The diagnosis could be preoperatively established in 28 patients (73.7%) with a plain chest X-ray or computed tomography scan. Rupture of diaphragm was left-sided in 31 patients (81.6%), right-sided in 6 (15.8%), and bilateral in 1 (2.6%). Sixteen patients had preoperative shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, heart rate >120/min). Initial operative approaches were laparotomy in 22 patients (57.9%) and thoracotomy in 16 (42.1%). Eleven required additional exploration. The rate of additional exploration was higher in patients who initially underwent thoracotomy than laparotomy (56.2% vs 9.1%, P = .003). Patients who underwent additional exploration had a significantly longer operation time (330 minutes vs 237.5 minutes, P = .012), and a significantly higher morbidity rate (72.7% vs 22.2%, P =.008). Overall mortality was observed in 6 patients (15.8%). The mortality was associated with right-sided TDR (P = .042) and preoperative shock (P = .003). Neither ISS nor delay in diagnosis posed a statistically significant risk to the outcome of patients. Intra-abdominal organ injuries are more common than intrathoracic injuries in patients with BTDR, indicating that laparotomy should be the initial approach in these patients. Preoperative shock and right-sided TDR are predictive of mortality after BTDR.

A case of tension faecopneumothorax after delayed diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia

Background

Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries from blunt or penetrating trauma are difficult to detect in the acute setting and, if missed, can result in significant morbidity and mortality in the future. We present a case demonstrating the natural progression of this resulting in faecopneumothorax, which is a rare but serious presentation.

Case presentation

A 22-year-old young man presented with left upper quadrant and chest pain, nausea, vomiting, and intermittent obstipation with a background of previous lower chest wall stabbings. Computed tomography demonstrated a diaphragmatic hernia containing the splenic flexure of the colon, but he declined treatment and self-discharged. He presented three more times with similar symptoms and self-discharged within a 2-week period and finally presented dyspnoeic and septic. Computed tomography demonstrated tension faecopneumothorax from the perforated colon. He was taken to theatres and found to have a 3-mm perforation at his splenic flexure and underwent a segmental resection of the affected colon, intrathoracic washout, and biological mesh repair of his diaphragmatic hernia. He remained alive and postoperative recovery was uneventful.

Conclusions

A review of the literature demonstrates the rarity of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries resulting in faecopneumothorax with only a few case reports in the last 50 years. We present a case demonstrating a natural progression of the condition and highlight the importance of having a high index of suspicion of diaphragmatic injuries in the trauma setting.

Retrospective analysis of 103 diaphragmatic injuries in patients operated in a trauma center

Objective:

to analyze the factors associated with death in patients with diaphragmatic injury treated at a trauma reference hospital.

Methods:

we conducted a retrospective study of patients with diaphragm injury attended at the Risoleta Tolentino Neves Hospital of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, between January 2010 and December 2014. We used The Collector® database of trauma records (MD, USA). We gathered data on demographics, location of the diaphragmatic lesion, site and number of associated lesions, type of therapeutic approach, complications and Injury Severity Score (ISS). The variable of interest was the occurrence of death.

Results:

we identified 103 patients and mortality was 16.5%. Penetrating lesions occurred in 98% of patients. Univariate analysis showed a mortality higher in patients whose treatment was non-operative, without closing of the defect (p=0.023), and lower in patients submitted to diaphragmatic suturing (p<0.001). The increase in the number of lesions was associated with an increase in mortality (p=0.048). In multivariate analysis, ISS>24 (OR=4.0, p=0.029) and diaphragmatic suturing (OR=0.76, p<0.001) were associated with mortality.

Conclusion:

The findings indicate that the traumatic rupture of the diaphragm rarely presents as an isolated lesion, being frequently associated with injuries of other organs, especially the liver and hollow viscera. Mortality was higher among those with ISS>24.

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture with underlying lung laceration and tension pneumoperitoneum

Tension pneumoperitoneum is commonly caused by gastrointestinal perforation and pulmonary causes are extremely rare. We present a case of a 47-year-old male post motor vehicle accident with a suspected left-sided haemopneumothorax on initial chest x-ray. CT of the chest post chest tube insertion showed a left-sided diaphragmatic rupture and an extensive diaphragmatic hernia. While en-route to the operating theatre, the intubated patient developed tension pneumoperitoneum with positive pressure ventilation and required immediate surgical intervention and repair. A review of the literature around tension pneumoperitoneum and diaphragmatic hernia in trauma is discussed.

Traumatic rupture of the diaphragm resulting in the sub-acute presentation of an incarcerated intra-thoracic transverse colon

The traumatic rupture of the diaphragm after blunt or penetrating injuries is a well described but uncommon entity. Its presentation in the form of herniated abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity is generally obscure and the recognition of this condition is often challenging. Although many cases remain asymptomatic, significant morbidity and mortality ensues with patients who present with incarceration, strangulation and eventual visceral compromise. Definitive guidelines in the management of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries are still lacking. This report outlines a case of sub-acute presentation of a traumatic diaphragmatic rupture in an elderly female following a motor vehicle accident that required urgent surgical intervention. We reviewed the pertinent literature, with an emphasis on the operative approach and the type of repair of the traumatic diaphragmatic defect.

Prevalence, management and outcome of traumatic diaphragm injuries managed by the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service

INTRODUCTION This audit of traumatic diaphram injury (TDI) from a busy South African trauma service reviews the spectrum of disease and highlights current approaches to these injuries. METHODS The Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) has maintained an Electronic Surgical Registry (ESR) and a Hybrid Electronic Medical Record (HEMR) system since January 1st 2012. RESULTS A total of 105 TDIs were identified and repaired during the study period. The mean patient age was 30 years (range 15-68 years - SD 9.7). The majority (92.4%) of patients were male (97/105). Penetrating trauma was the leading mechanism of injury (94%). 75 patients sustained a TDI from a stab wound, and the remaining 24 injuries resulted from gunshot wounds. Multiple associated injuries and high morbidity was seen with right diaphragm injury, blunt trauma, gunshot wounds and chronic diaphragmatic hernias. CONCLUSIONS TDI is a fairly uncommon injury with a local incidence of 1.6%. It presents in a spectrum from the obvious to the occult. Multiple associated injuries and high morbidity occur following blunt trauma or gunshot wounds, right diaphragm injury and chronic diaphragmatic hernias. Diagnostic laparoscopy offers a diagnostic and therapeutic tool to prevent progression of occult TDI to chronic diaphragmatic hernias.

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury: A diagnostic enigma with potential surgical pitfalls

BACKGROUND

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury (BTDI) is an uncommon injury and one which is difficult to diagnose. The objective of this study was to identify features associated with this injury.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study based on records of 354307 blunt trauma victims treated between 1998 and 2013 collected by the Israeli National Trauma Registry.

RESULTS

BTDI was reported in 231 (0.065%) patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 84.4% of the injuries: 97 (42.0%) were reported as drivers; 54 (23.4%) were passengers; 34 (14.7%) were pedestrians hit by cars; and 10 (4.3%) were on motorcycles. There were more males than females (2.5:1) compared with blunt trauma patients without BTDI (p<.001). Patients with BTDI were significantly younger than blunt trauma patients without BTDI (p<.001). ISS was 9-14 in 5.2%, 16-24 in 16.9%, 25-75 in 77.9%. Urgent surgery was performed in 62% of the patients and 79.7% had surgery within 24h of admission. Mortality was 26.8%. Over 40% of patients with BTDI had associated rib, pelvic and/or extremity injuries. Over 30% had associated spleen, liver and/or lung injuries. Nevertheless, less than 1% of patients with skeletal injuries and less than 2.5% with solid organ injuries overall had associated BTDI. Despite hollow viscus injury being less prevalent, up to 6% of patients with this injury had associated BTDI.

CONCLUSIONS

BTDI is infrequent following blunt trauma. Hollow viscus injuries were more predictive of BTDI than skeletal or solid organ injuries.

Traumatic injury among females: does gender matter?

BACKGROUND

Trauma remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Generally, the incidence of traumatic injuries is disproportionately high in males. However, trauma in females is underreported.

AIM

To study the epidemiology and outcome of different mechanisms and types of traumatic injuries in women.

METHODS

We conducted a traditional narrative review using PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE, searching for English-language publications for gender-specific trauma between January 1993 and January 2013 using key words "trauma", "gender", "female" and "women".

RESULTS

Among 1150 retrieved articles, 71 articles were relevant over 20 years. Although it is an important public health problem, traumatic injuries among females remain under-reported.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for further research and evaluation of the exact burden of traumatic injuries among females together with the implementation of effective community based preventive programs.

Evolution in the management of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: a multicenter review

BACKGROUND

Traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) is uncommon and has historically been identified by chest x-ray and repaired by laparotomy with nonabsorbable suture. Blunt TDI was more frequently (90%) detected on the left. With advances in imaging and operative techniques, our objective was to evaluate evolution in incidence, location, and management of TDI.

METHODS

The medical records of patients admitted to three Wisconsin regional trauma centers with TDI from 1996 to 2011 were reviewed. Patients were stratified into blunt and penetrating injury and early (1996-2003) and recent (2004-2011) periods. p < 0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

A total of 454 patients was included, 87% were men. Median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 22 and 19 in the early and recent periods, respectively. Diagnostic modality for TDI did not change over time when comparing chest x-ray, computed tomography, or intraoperative diagnosis for blunt (p = 0.214) or penetrating (p = 0.119) TDI. More right-sided penetrating TDI were identified in the recent versus early group (49% vs. 27%). Perihiatal injury was rare (2%). Minimally invasive repairs increased in the recent versus early group of penetrating TDI (5.8% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.040). Complex repairs (mesh, transposition) were required in only three patients. In-hospital mortality was 15% and 4% for blunt and penetrating TDIs, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A large increase in the frequency of both blunt and penetrating TDIs in our region was documented. While no difference was observed regarding diagnosis of blunt TDI during the two study periods, our data show a change from historical reports; more injuries were detected by computed tomography. An increase in right-sided penetrating TDI was also observed. A small but previously unreported incidence of perihiatal/pericardial injury occurred with both blunt and penetrating TDIs. While the majority of injuries were repaired with laparotomy, minimally invasive repairs were used more frequently in the recent period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level III. Therapeutic study, level IV.