Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance After Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance in kidney transplanted patients: novel insights into long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Because of increased access to kidney transplantation in elderly subjects, the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance (MGUS) in kidney transplantation (KT) is growing. However, little is known about the consequences of MGUS on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 70 recipients with MGUS present at transplantation (KTMG) and 114 patients with MGUS occurring after KT (DNMG), among 3059 patients who underwent a KT in two French kidney transplantation centers. We compared outcomes of KTMG with those of matched controls.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar except for an older age in KTMG compared with the DNMG group (62 vs 57 years, P = .03). Transient MGUS occurred more frequently in DNMG patients (45% vs 24%, P = .007). When compared with matched controls without MGUS, KTMG patients showed higher frequency and earlier post-transplant solid cancers (15% vs 5%, P = .04) and a trend for more bacterial infections (63% vs 48%, P = .08), without difference regarding patient and graft survival, rejection episodes or hematological complications. KTMG patients with an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio and/or severe hypogammaglobulinemia at the time of KT experienced shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

MGUS detection at the time of KT is neither associated with a higher occurrence of graft rejection, nor adversely affects graft or overall survival. MGUS should not contraindicate KT. However, MGUS at the time of KT may be associated with higher risk of early neoplastic and infectious complications and warrants prolonged surveillance. Measurement of serum free light chain should be performed before transplant to refine the risk evaluation of KTMG patients and propose personalized follow-up and immunosuppression.

Kidney Transplantation and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

Plasma cell disorders are one of the most common hematologic malignancies. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is defined by a serum monoclonal protein <3 g/dL, bone marrow plasma cell infiltration <10%, and most importantly absence of end-organ damage. The prevalence of MGUS in general population is estimated to be 1%–4% and its frequency increases with age with 3% among people above 50 y of age. The risk of progression to clinically significant plasma cell dyscrasia is estimated to be 1% per year. With aging population and increasing use of transplantation for the management of kidney disease in older adults, MGUS is being identified during the evaluation for kidney transplant candidacy or during the postkidney transplant follow-up. MGUS in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing evaluation for kidney transplant can pose a complex management dilemma. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about the prevalence of MGUS in ESRD population and the impact of kidney transplantation on the progression of MGUS to clinically significant plasma cell disorder. We make recommendations for the screening of ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation and the management of MGUS after renal transplant.

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2020 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

Evaluation of patients for kidney transplant candidacy is a comprehensive process that involves a detailed assessment of medical and surgical issues, psychosocial factors, and patients' physical and cognitive abilities with an aim of balancing the benefits of transplantation and potential risks of surgery and long-term immunosuppression. There is considerable variability among transplant centers in their approach to evaluation and decision-making regarding transplant candidacy. The 2020 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Guidelines Outcome) clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and management of candidates for kidney transplantation provides practice recommendations that can serve as a useful reference guide to transplant professionals. The guideline, covering a broad range of topics, was developed by an international group of experts from transplant and nephrology through a review of literature published until May 2019. A work group of US transplant nephrologists convened by NKF-KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Quality Initiative) chose key topics for this commentary with a goal of presenting a broad discussion to the US transplant community. Each section of this article has a summary of the key KDIGO guideline recommendations, followed by a brief commentary on the recommendations, their clinical utility, and potential implementation challenges. The KDOQI work group agrees broadly with the KDIGO recommendations but also recognizes and highlights the decision-making challenges that arise from lack of high-quality evidence and the need to balance equity with utility of organ transplantation.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

The clinical and pathological features of plasma cell myeloma post solid organ transplantation

Plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs), comprising plasma cell myelomas (PCMs) and plasmacytomas, which occur after solid organ transplantation, represent rare subtypes of monomorphic post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (M-PTLDs). Data regarding the clinical and pathological features of post-transplant (PT)-PCMs are limited. To gain a better understanding of disease biology, we performed comprehensive immunophenotypic analysis, reviewed cytogenetic analysis results and evaluated clinical outcomes of PT-PCMs diagnosed and treated at our institution. Fifteen PT-PCM (M: F - 4:1) and two PT-MGUS (two males) cases were identified. The median age of PT-PCM patients was 68 years (29-79 years) and PCMs presented at a median of 9.7 years (0.5-24.7 years) after transplantation. The PT-PCMs accounted for 11.6% of all M-PTLDs and the period prevalence was 9/3108 (0.29%), 3/1071 (0.28%), 2/1345 (0.15%) and 1/878 (0.11%) post kidney, heart, liver and lung transplantation. Lytic bone disease was observed in 1/11 (9%) patients. Marrow plasma cell infiltration ranged from 10%-70% (median 20%), with 10/15 (67%) and 5/15 (33%) cases manifesting immature and plasmablastic morphology. The immunophenotype of all cases and cytogenetic abnormalities, identified in 60% of cases, were similar to multiple myeloma (MM) of immunocompetent individuals. All PT-PCMs were EBER negative. Ten of 11 (91%) patients with active MM were treated, all with proteasome inhibitor-based therapy. Treatment response and 5-year overall survival (54.5%) was comparable to MM of immunocompetent individuals. However, the survival of patients with plasmablastic PCMs was inferior to those with immature PCMs. 0ur findings indicate PT-PCMs to be predominantly late onset PTLDs that have similar clinicopathologic characteristics as conventional MM.

Continuous function of 80 primary renal allografts for 30-47 years with maintenance prednisone and azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil therapy: A clinical mosaic of long-term successes

Eighty primary renal allograft recipients, 61 living-related and 19 deceased donor, transplanted from 1963 through 1984 had continuous graft function for 30-47 years. They were treated with three different early immunosuppression programs (1963-1970: thymectomy, splenectomy, high oral prednisone; 1971-1979: divided-dose intravenous methylprednisolone; and 1980-1984: antilymphocyte globulin) each with maintenance prednisone and azathioprine, and no calcineurin inhibitor. Long-term treatment often included the anti-platelet medication, dipyridamole. Although both recipient and donor ages were young (27.2 ± 9.5 and 33.1 ± 12.0 years, respectively), six recipients with a parent donor had >40-year success. At 35 years, death-censored graft survival was 85.3% and death with a functioning graft 84.2%; overall graft survival was 69.5% (Kaplan-Meier estimate). Biopsy-documented early acute cellular and highly probable antibody-mediated rejections were reversed with divided-dose intravenous methylprednisolone. Complications are detailed in an integrated timeline. Hypogammaglobulinemia identified after 20 years doubled the infection rate. An association between a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and non-plasma-cell malignancies was identified. Twenty-seven azathioprine-treated patients tested after 37 years had extremely low levels of T1/T2 B lymphocytes representing a "low immunosuppression state of allograft acceptance (LISAA)". The lifetime achievements of these patients following a single renal allograft and low-dose maintenance immunosuppression are remarkable. Their success evolved as a clinical mosaic.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance coexisting in patients undergoing kidney transplantation does not adversely influence post-graft clinical outcome

Background

Management of patients with oncohaematological disorders such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a frequent problem in pre-transplant work-up. Insights on disease progression and long-term functional outcomes are still lacking in this setting.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis on all patients with MGUS who underwent kidney transplant (KT) at our centre between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017 (cases, n = 65). Patients were matched with a control group (KTs with similar characteristics but without history of haematological disease, controls, n = 1079). Primary endpoints were graft and patient survival; secondary endpoints were causes of graft failure, patient death, occurrence of allograft rejection, post-transplant neoplasia (not correlated to previous disorder) and/or infectious episodes.

Results

The MGUS and control groups had a similar mean age [60 (29–79) versus 55.2 (19.3–79.5) years, respectively] and percentage of males (69.2% versus 64.6%, respectively). Median follow-up time since KT was 3.5 years (0–14) in cases and 8.3 years (0–14.9) in controls. All MGUS patients underwent KT following extensive multidiscliplinary investigations. No differences were found between cases and controls regarding patient and graft survival or post-transplant complications except for lower incidence of infections (58.7% versus 69.8%, P = 0.019) and increased use of mTOR inhbitors (30.3% versus 14.7%, P = 0.001) in MGUS. MGUS isotype did not influence graft and patient survival. The absence of difference in patients and graft survival was also confirmed in an adjunctive analysis where MGUS were compared with controls (ratio 1:2) matched for recipient age, gender, number of transplantations and transplant period.

Conclusion

Patients with MGUS may undergo KT without significantly increased risks of complications, provided that appropriate diagnostic procedures are carefully followed. Multidiscipline-based studies are crucial for establishing well designed pre- and post-transplant protocols for the best management of patients with coexisting MGUS and end-stage renal disease.

Current opinions in nephrology and hypertension: kidney transplantation in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Plasma cell dyscrasias encompass a group of hematological disorders characterized by increased production of immunoglobulins by clonal B cells. Kidney involvement is common. Significant advances in the treatment of plasma cell dyscrasias have resulted in improved survival and may permit kidney transplantation in candidates previously denied transplantation. Treatments may also have effects on kidney transplant recipients who develop plasma cell dyscrasias post transplantation.

RECENT FINDING

The available evidence suggests that transplantation of candidates with nonmultiple myeloma plasma cell dyscrasias provides good outcome with low recurrence rates, so long as the disease has been treated with a complete or good partial response prior to transplantation. Candidates with a history untreated MGRS or a history of multiple myeloma have a high rate of recurrence posttransplant. Kidney transplant recipients who develop plasma cell dyscrasias post transplantation have an increased risk of death and thalidomide-based regimens may increase the risk of rejection.

SUMMARY

Transplant candidates with a history of plasma cell dyscrasia who are in remission should not be excluded from transplantation. Individuals with multiple myeloma have a high rate of recurrence and myeloma post kidney transplant must be managed carefully.

Monoclonal Gammopathies After Renal Transplantation: A Single-center Study

INTRODUCTION

Plasma cell disorders (PCDs) are clonal plasma cell disorders that include conditions such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS), multiple myeloma (MM), smoldering MM (SMM), solitary plasmacytoma, and light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. The risk factors associated with and the clinical course of PCDs after renal transplantation is not well established although immunosuppressive protocols may impact the incidence and natural history of PCDs posttransplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated patients with a history of renal transplant who developed a PCD between January 1, 2014-December 31, 2018.

RESULT

A total of 41 patients met the inclusion criteria including 29 with MGUS and 12 with symptomatic PCD (4 with MM, 2 with SMM, 4 with MGRS, 1 with AL amyloidosis, and 1 with solitary plasmacytoma). The median follow-up of survivors was 41.6 months. Three patients (1 with MGUS and 2 with MGRS) progressed to MM during the follow-up period. There was a male preponderance in both groups. There was no correlation between the donor and immunosuppressive regimen and the development of a PCD. Patients with symptomatic PCD had higher serum creatinine and M-protein levels at diagnosis and higher free light chain ratio and plasma cell burden. There was also a higher percentage of allograft failure noted in the symptomatic PCD subset 50% (n = 6), whereas only 23% (n = 7) of patients had allograft failure in the MGUS group.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the importance of considering monoclonal gammopathy in the differential of renal dysfunction after kidney transplant and the need to follow these patients closely to monitor for progression to symptomatic PCD.

The clinical implication of monoclonal gammopathies: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and of renal significance

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) has introduced a new perspective to several well-known disease entities impacting nephrology, haematology and pathology. Given the constantly changing disease spectrum of these entities, it is clinically imperative to establish diagnostic and treatment pathways supported by evidence-based medicine. MGRS is a disease of the kidney, secondary to plasma cell clonal proliferation or immune dysfunction, requiring therapeutic intervention to eradicate the offending clone. To fully understand the disease(s), it is prerequisite to determine the significance of the findings. The diagnostic work up should be extensive due to the wide heterogeneity of clinical presentation, ultimately necessitating kidney biopsy. Particular patient profiles such as AL amyloidosis, which may be diagnosed through biopsies of other tissues/organs, may be an exception. Treatment decisions should be formulated by multi-disciplinary consensus: nephrologists, haematologists and pathologists. The ultimate goal in managing MGRS is eradication of the offending plasma cell clone which requires targeted chemotherapy and, in eligible cases, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We present a review of diagnostic procedures, treatment options and advances in the last few years in the management of MGRS in an effort to acquaint specialists with this new face of several older diseases.

The Evolution of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance in Kidney Transplant Recipients

It is unclear if immunosuppression increases the likelihood of malignant transformation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and whether adverse renal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with MGUS are more frequent.

Immunoglobulin abnormalities in 1677 solid organ transplant recipients. Implications for posttransplantation follow-up

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). However, there is no consensus on PTLD screening methods. Gammopathies (GP), which occur in 10-25% of SOT recipients, have been linked to subsequent development of PTLD. Therefore, GP detection methods, such as serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), serum protein immunofixation (SIFE), urine protein immunofixation (UIFE) and the quantitative measurement of serum free light chains (SFLC) are candidate methods for PTLD screening.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the frequency of PTLD and GP, association of GP with subsequent PTLD, allograft loss or death and the diagnostic performance of SPE/SIFE in PTLD screening. The main objective was to explore, whether GP detection methods can be used to enhance the efficiency of PTLD screening and to formulate a concise algorithm for posttransplantation (post-Tx) follow-up.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study on 1677 SOT recipients with SPE/SIFE data who underwent kidney, liver, heart, pancreas, Langerhans islets or multiple organ transplantation at the Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine between 1966 and 2015. The median (IQR) of follow-up time was 8.0 (4.0-12.0) years.

RESULTS

The frequencies of PTLD and GP in SOT recipients were 2.8% and 6.4%, respectively. The frequencies of transient GP, GP of undetermined significance and malignant GP were 33%, 63% and 4% respectively. The median time between SOT and GP detection was 2.0 (interquartile range 1.0-7.0) years. GP was associated with a significantly higher risk of PTLD, allograft loss and death, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of a 6.06 (2.51-14.64), 2.61 (1.49-4.6) and 1.99 (1.2-3.3), respectively. Additionally, GP was associated with 2.98-fold increased risk of allograft loss in kidney transplant patients. SPE diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for PTLD were 14.8% and 93.9%, respectively. PTLD was diagnosed more often and earlier if SPE/SIFE was included in the post-Tx follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

GP after SOT is associated with a high risk of PTLD, allograft loss and poor survival. The combination of SPE, SIFE, SFLC and UIFE is optimal for GP detection. These methods aid in identifying patients who are at risk for PTLD or allograft damage and should be included in regular post-Tx follow-up.