The Problem of Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for acute allograft rejection and delayed graft function prediction in kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis

Background

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been the focus of several observational studies investigating their roles in acute allograft rejection (AR) and delayed graft function (DGF) among kidney transplant (KT) recipients. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of the NLR and PLR on the incidence of AR and DGF in KT recipients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE and Science Direct from their inception through October 2023. Random effects models were used. To investigate potential sources of heterogeneity, we performed subgroup and meta-regression analyses. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis ver. 3 software package was used.

Results

Seven studies (247 KT recipients with AR or DGF and 475 controls) were analyzed. Our pooled analysis showed a significantly higher NLR in KT recipients with AR (weighted mean difference [WMD], 2.292; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.449-3.135; P<0.001) than in controls. The preoperative NLR was insignificantly higher in patients with DGF (WMD, 0.871; 95% CI, -0.103 to 1.846; P=0.08). The PLR was insignificantly higher in KT recipients with AR than in controls (WMD, 32.125; 95% CI, -19.978 to 84.228; P=0.227). The PLR was not significantly different between KT recipients with DGF and controls. Region, publication year, sample size, donor type, biopsy type, AR type and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score did not affect the outcomes of the meta-analysis. Meta-regression showed that publication year and donor type might be sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusions

This study revealed a significantly higher NLR in patients with AR. This suggests that NLR may be utilized as a noninvasive marker for AR in KT recipients.

The immune duality of osteopontin and its therapeutic implications for kidney transplantation

Osteopontin (OPN) is a multifunctional glycoprotein with various structural domains that enable it to perform diverse functions in both physiological and pathological states. This review comprehensively examines OPN from multiple perspectives, including its protein structure, interactions with receptors, interactions with immune cells, and roles in kidney diseases and transplantation. This review explores the immunological duality of OPN and its significance and value as a biomarker and therapeutic target in kidney transplantation. In cancer, OPN typically promotes tumor evasion by suppressing the immune system. Conversely, in immune-related kidney diseases, particularly kidney transplantation, OPN activates the immune system by enhancing the migration and activation of immune cells, thereby exacerbating kidney damage. This immunological duality may stem from different OPN splice variants and the exposure, after cleavage, of different structural domains, which play distinct biological roles in cellular interactions. Additionally, OPN has a significant biological impact posttransplantation and on chronic kidney disease and, highlighting its importance as a biomarker and potential therapeutic target. Future research should further explore the specific mechanisms of OPN in kidney transplantation to improve treatment strategies and enhance patient quality of life.

Detection of Subclinical Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: Current and Future Practices

INTRODUCTION

The successes in the field of pediatric kidney transplantation over the past 60 years have been extraordinary. Year over year, there have been significant improvements in short-term graft survival. However, improvements in longer-term outcomes have been much less apparent. One important contributor has been the phenomenon of low-level rejection in the absence of clinical manifestations-so-called subclinical rejection (SCR).

METHODS

Traditionally, rejection has been diagnosed by changes in clinical parameters, including but not limited to serum creatinine and proteinuria. This review examines the shortcomings of this approach, the effects of SCR on kidney allograft outcome, the benefits and drawbacks of surveillance biopsies to identify SCR, and new urine and blood biomarkers that define the presence or absence of SCR.

RESULTS

Serum creatinine is an unreliable index of SCR. Surveillance biopsies are the method most utilized to detect SCR. However, these have significant drawbacks. New biomarkers show promise. These biomarkers include blood gene expression profiles and donor derived-cell free DNA; urine gene expression profiles; urinary cytokines, chemokines, and metabolomics; and other promising blood and urine tests.

CONCLUSION

Specific emphasis is placed on studies carried out in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03719339.

New Insights into Pediatric Kidney Transplant Rejection Biomarkers: Tissue, Plasma and Urine MicroRNAs Compared to Protocol Biopsy Histology

The early identification of a subclinical rejection (SCR) can improve the long-term outcome of the transplanted kidney through intensified immunosuppression. However, the only approved diagnostic method is the protocol biopsy, which remains an invasive method and not without minor and/or major complications. The protocol biopsy is defined as the sampling of allograft tissue at pre-established times even in the absence of an impaired renal function; however, it does not avoid histological damage. Therefore, the discovery of new possible biomarkers useful in the prevention of SCR has gained great interest. Among all the possible candidates, there are microRNAs (miRNAs), which are short, noncoding RNA sequences, that are involved in mediating numerous post-transcriptional pathways. They can be found not only in tissues, but also in different biological fluids, both as free particles and contained in extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by different cell types. In this study, we firstly performed a retrospective miRNA screening analysis on biopsies and serum EV samples of 20 pediatric transplanted patients, followed by a second screening on another 10 pediatric transplanted patients' urine samples at one year post-transplant. In both cohorts, we divided the patients into two groups: patients with histological SCR and patients without histological SCR at one year post-transplantation. The isolated miRNAs were analyzed in an NGS platform to identify different expressions in the two allograft states. Although no statistical data were found in sera, in the tissue and urinary EVs, we highlighted signatures of miRNAs associated with the histological SCR state.

The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice

Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.

Post-Transplant Surveillance and Management of Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients in Europe

Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) is the leading cause of immune-related allograft failure following kidney transplantation. Chronic active ABMR (CABMR) typically occurs after one-year post-transplant and is the most common cause of late allograft failure. This study was designed to assess common practices in Europe for post-transplant surveillance 1 year after kidney transplant, as well as the diagnosis and management of CABMR. A 15-minute online survey with 58 multiple choice or open-ended questions was completed by EU transplant nephrologists, transplant surgeons and nephrologists. Survey topics included patient caseloads, post-transplant routine screening and treatment of CABMR. The results indicated that observing clinical measures of graft function form the cornerstone of post-transplant surveillance. This may be suboptimal, leading to late diagnoses and untreatable disease. Indeed, less than half of patients who develop CABMR receive treatment beyond optimization of immune suppression. This is attributable to not only late diagnoses, but also a lack of proven efficacious therapies. Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG), steroid pulse and apheresis are prescribed by the majority to treat CABMR. While biologics can feature as part of treatment, there is no single agent that is being used by more than half of physicians.

Chronic Active T-Cell Mediated Kidney Rejection as a Clinically Significant Type of Allograft Loss?

The purpose of this article is to assess the present knowledge about chronic active (CA) T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) of a kidney. In the research authors review current Banff diagnostic criteria used in kidney rejection, focus on their possible future evolution, and investigate the role of currently available molecular methods that could be implemented into the diagnostic scheme. Research also points out previously and currently available treatment methods applied to CA TCMR and takes into account possible side effects consequent upon the therapy. Moreover, attention is being paid to the CA TCMR coincidence with other kidney rejection types such as antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and its influence on the treatment approach. Authors also mark the possibility of non-HLA antibodies coexistence in patients with CA TCMR and describe its possible resonance on kidney allograft function. Nonetheless, it seems that current knowledge about CA TCMR is not sufficient and requires further investigation.