Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Is Now the Most Common Indication for Liver Transplant Waitlisting Among Young American Adults

Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Advanced Alcoholic Liver Disease: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literature

The impact of excessive alcohol on human health is associated with a lifetime cumulative use of alcohol and is further affected by various factors such as age, gender, nutritional status, concurrent cigarette smoking or drug use, diabetes, obesity, other cardiovascular diseases, and socio-economic status. Alcohol cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a type of acquired dilated cardiomyopathy, which is associated with long-term heavy alcohol consumption with historical rates varying from 3.8% to 47 % among patients with heart failure. Data regarding the prevalence of concurrent ACM in patients with alcoholic liver disease is limited. Among 483 patients with advanced liver disease who underwent liver transplant evaluation at a single transplant center during 2016-2021, based on screening transthoracic echocardiogram and a clear definition, none (0%) of the patients had alcoholic cardiomyopathy (range ejection fraction: 55-80%), 7% had left ventricular dilation (mild dilation: 82%), and 12.4% had diastolic dysfunction. We also review data regarding known risk factors, natural progression, and treatment of ACM, and further explore the evidence regarding the concurrence of alcohol-associated disease in liver with other organs such as heart and pancreas. In persons with excessive alcohol consumption, abstinence from alcohol or moderating its use has been shown to help decrease the progression of heart failure, arrythmias, and hypertension as well as liver dysfunction. Focus on the identification of both genetic markers and modifiable risk factors associated with various organ injuries in conjunction with public health policies for the safe use of alcohol is needed to mitigate the risk of alcohol use disorder.

Alcohol-Associated Pancreatitis and Liver Disease Among Adolescents and Young Adults

This cohort study examined the annual incidence rates of alcohol-associated end-organ disease among adolescents and young adults in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2021.

Increased mortality from alcohol use disorder, alcohol-associated liver disease, and liver cancer from alcohol among older adults in the United States: 2000 to 2021

BACKGROUND

To investigate the trends in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), liver cancer from alcohol, and alcohol use disorder (AUD) burden among older adults in the United States (US).

METHODS

We gathered the ALD, liver cancer from alcohol, and AUD prevalence, mortality, and age-standardized rates (ASRs) from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021 between 2010 and 2021. We estimated the annual percent change (APC) with confidence intervals (CIs) for the burden of ALD, liver cancer from alcohol, and AUD in older adults (>70 years) in the United States. The findings were contrasted with global estimates and categorized by sex and state.

RESULTS

In 2021, there were approximately 512,340 cases of AUD, 56,990 cases of ALD, and 4490 cases of primary liver cancer from alcohol among older adults in the United States. In contrast to declining ASRs of prevalence and mortality in the global burden, these parameters were increased in older adults in the United States. From 2000 to 2021, prevalence from AUD (APC: 0.54%, 95% CI 0.43% to 0.65%), ALD (APC + 0.54%, 95% CI 0.22% to 0.86%), and primary liver cancer from alcohol (APC 2.93%, 95% CI 2.76% to 3.11%) increased. Forty states in the United States exhibited a rise in the prevalence rates of ALD in older adults.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlighted the increased prevalence and mortality of AUD, ALD, and primary liver cancer from alcohol among older adults in the United Sates, contrasting with the decline in global trends. Public health strategies on ALD, AUD, and primary liver cancer from alcohol, which targets older adults, are urgently needed.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis in Adolescents and Young Adults

Importance

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) has high mortality, and rates are increasing among adolescents and young adults (AYAs).

Objective

To define the sex-specific epidemiology of AH in AYAs and the association between female sex and liver-related outcomes after a first presentation of AH.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective, population-based cohort study of routinely collected health care data held at ICES from Ontario, Canada, was conducted. Data on AYAs (age, 13-39 years) with first presentation of AH without a history of cirrhosis and/or decompensation from January 1 to December 31, 2022, were included in the analysis.

Exposures

Study year and female sex.

Main Outcome and Measures

Overall and sex-specific yearly rates of AH were compared using Poisson regression and rate ratios (RRs). Associations between female sex and incident cirrhosis and/or decompensation were evaluated using competing risks regression, and liver-related mortality by sex was evaluated with cumulative incidence functions.

Results

A total of 3340 AYAs with AH were identified. Median age was 33 (IQR, 28-36) years, and the population included 1190 (36%) females and 2150 (64%) males. Rates of AH increased by 8% per year (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.09), with yearly rates increasing faster among females (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.09-1.12) than males (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06-1.07). A total of 2374 individuals (71%) were alive without cirrhosis 6 months after AH presentation. Of those, 527 (22%) developed incident cirrhosis and/or decompensation after a median follow-up of 4 (IQR, 2-9) years (37% females vs 29% males; P < .001). After adjustment, female sex was associated with a 47% higher subhazard of cirrhosis and/or decompensation compared with male sex (38%) (subhazard, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23-1.76; P < .001). The cumulative incidence of liver-related mortality at 10 years was higher among females (11.0%; 95% CI, 8.3%-14.2%) than males (6.9%; 95% CI, 5.4%-8.6%) (P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

Over the past 2 decades, the rates of AH among AYAs increased significantly, with the greatest increase observed among females. The findings of this study suggest sex-specific interventions to prevent the development of AH and the progression to cirrhosis after an episode of AH are needed.

Liver transplantation for alcohol-associated liver disease

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in many countries, including the United States. However, LT for ALD is a complex and evolving field with ethical, social, and medical challenges. Thus, it requires a multidisciplinary approach and individualized decision-making. Short-term and long-term patient and graft survival of patients undergoing LT for ALD are comparable to other indications, but there is a continued need to develop better tools to identify patients who may benefit from LT, improve the pretransplant and posttransplant management of ALD, and evaluate the impact of LT for ALD on the organ donation and transplantation systems. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on LT for ALD, from alcohol-associated hepatitis to decompensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis. We discuss the indications, criteria, outcomes, and controversies of LT for these conditions and highlight the knowledge gaps and research priorities in this field.

Alcohol and Metabolic Syndrome Interaction

Alcohol-related liver disease and metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease are the most common causes of chronic liver disease. Globally, alcohol intake, and metabolic syndrome driven by excessive caloric intake and sedentary lifestyle have steadily increased over the past decades. Given the high prevalence rates of both excessive alcohol consumption and components of metabolic syndrome, both can frequently coexist in the same individuals and impact their lives. In this article, we review the impact of alcohol and metabolic syndrome on liver-related outcomes.

The impact of county-level food access on the mortality and post-transplant survival among patients with steatotic liver disease

BACKGROUND

The impact of county-level food access on mortality associated with steatotic liver disease, as well as post-liver transplant outcomes among individuals with steatotic liver disease, have not been characterized.

METHODS

Data on steatotic liver disease-related mortality and outcomes of liver transplant recipients with steatotic liver disease between 2010 and 2020 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control Prevention mortality as well as the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases. These data were linked to the food desert score, defined as the proportion of the total population in each county characterized as having both low income and limited access to grocery stores.

RESULTS

Among 2,710 counties included in the analytic cohort, median steatotic liver disease-related mortality was 27.3 per 100,000 population (interquartile range 24.9-32.1). Of note, patients residing in counties with high steatotic liver disease death rates were more likely to have higher food desert scores (low: 5.0, interquartile range 3.1-7.8 vs moderate: 6.1, interquartile range, 3.8-9.3 vs high: 7.6, interquartile range 4.1-11.7). Among 28,710 patients who did undergo liver transplantation, 5,310 (18.4%) individuals lived in counties with a high food desert score. Liver transplant recipients who resided in counties with the worst food access were more likely to have a higher body mass index (>35 kg/m2: low food desert score, 17.3% vs highest food desert score, 20.1%). After transplantation, there was no difference in 2-year graft survival relative to county-level food access (food desert score: low: 88.4% vs high: 88.6%; P = .77).

CONCLUSION

Poor food access was associated with a higher incidence rate of steatotic liver disease-related death, as well as lower utilization of liver transplants. On the other hand, among patients who did receive a liver transplant, there was no difference in 2-year graft survival regardless of food access strata. Policy initiatives should target the expansion of transplantation services to vulnerable communities in which there is a high mortality of steatotic liver disease.

Imaging of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) continues to be a global health concern, responsible for a significant number of deaths worldwide. Although most individuals who consume alcohol do not develop ALD, heavy drinkers and binge drinkers are at increased risk. Unfortunately, ALD is often undetected until it reaches advanced stages, frequently associated with portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). ALD is now the leading indication for liver transplant. The incidence of alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Early diagnosis of ALD is therefore important in patient management and determination of prognosis, as abstinence can halt disease progression. The spectrum of ALD includes steatosis, steatohepatitis, and cirrhosis, with steatosis the most common manifestation. Diagnostic techniques including ultrasound, CT, and MRI provide useful information for identifying ALD and excluding other causes of liver dysfunction. Heterogeneous steatosis and transient perfusion changes on CT and MRI in the clinical setting of alcohol-use disorder are diagnostic of severe AH. Elastography techniques are useful for assessing fibrosis and monitoring treatment response. These various imaging modalities are also useful in HCC surveillance and diagnosis. This review discusses the imaging modalities currently used in the evaluation of ALD, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and clinical applications.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease

ABSTRACT

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is the most common cause of advanced hepatic disease and frequent indication for liver transplantation worldwide. With harmful alcohol use as the primary risk factor, increasing alcohol use over the past decade has resulted in rapid growth of the ALD-related healthcare burden. The spectrum of ALD ranges from early asymptomatic liver injury to advanced disease with decompensation and portal hypertension. Compared with those with other etiologies of liver disease, patients with ALD progress faster and more often present at an advanced stage. A unique phenotype of advanced disease is alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) presenting with rapid onset or worsening of jaundice, and acute on chronic liver failure in severe forms conveying a 1-month mortality risk of 20%-50%. The model for end stage disease score is the most accurate score to stratify AH severity (>20 defined as severe disease). Corticosteroids are currently the only available therapeutic with proven efficacy for patients with severe AH, providing survival benefit at 1 month in 50%-60% of patients. Abstinence of alcohol use, a crucial determinant of long-term outcomes, is challenging to achieve in ALD patients with concurrent alcohol use disorder (AUD). As patients with ALD are rarely treated for AUD, strategies are needed to overcome barriers to AUD treatment in patients with ALD and to promote a multidisciplinary integrated care model with hepatology, addiction medicine providers, and social workers to comprehensively manage the dual pathologies of liver disease and of AUD. Liver transplantation, a definitive treatment option in patients with advanced cirrhosis, should be considered in selected patients with AH, who are unresponsive to medical therapy and have a low risk of relapse to posttransplant alcohol use. Level of evidence and strength of recommendations were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system. This guideline was developed under the American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee.

Alcohol consumption, alcohol use disorder and organ transplantation

In the present experience we have evaluated the link alcohol consumption/alcohol use disorder (AUD) and organ transplantation (OT) in order to provide adequate suggestions. The data used for the preparation of these recommendations are based on a detailed analysis of the scientific literature published before August 31, 2022 (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar). Furthermore, in the process of developing this work, we consulted the guidelines/position papers of the scientific societies. With regard to the liver transplantation, there are position papers/guidelines that clearly define indications and contraindications for including the AUD patient in the transplant list. One of the major difficulties in this area is psychosocial assessment which can be influenced by stigma. To solve this problem, it is necessary to use objective tools. However, this assessment should be carried out after providing the patient and family adequate tools to be able to create or recreate reliable socio-family support. This behavior should also be used in the case of other OTs. For the latter, however, adequate guidelines must be created which at the moment do not exist or if there are, as in the case of heart transplantation, they are not sufficient. Even in the absence of obvious alcohol addiction, it is recommended to use alcohol use disorder identification test and to include the addiction specialist in the multidisciplinary transplant team. Besides, providing family members with the tools necessary to better support the patient is essential. They are patients with alcohol use disorder/ possible presence of psychopathological manifestations and alcohol-related pathology (cirrhosis, cardiomyopathy, liver-kidney disfunction, etc.). A cardiovascular and oncologic surveillance post-OT is recommended. For the selection of patients to be included in the list for non-LT (heart, lung, kidney, multivisceral, etc.) it is mandatory to include the diagnosis and treatment of AUDs in the guidelines. What has already been indicated for LT may be useful. Timing of alcoholic abstention in relation to clinical severity, optimal psychosocial activity, anticraving therapy in relation to the type of underlying disease and clinical severity. Close collaboration between scientific societies is required to better manage AUD patients who need OT.

A Comprehensive Review of Liver Allograft Fibrosis and Steatosis: From Cause to Diagnosis

Despite advances in posttransplant care, long-term outcomes for liver transplant recipients remain unchanged. Approximately 25% of recipients will advance to graft cirrhosis and require retransplantation. Graft fibrosis progresses in the context of de novo or recurrent disease. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection was previously the most important cause of graft failure but is now curable in the majority of patients. However, with an increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as the most rapidly increasing indication for liver transplantation, metabolic dysfunction-associated liver injury is anticipated to become an important cause of graft fibrosis alongside alloimmune hepatitis and alcoholic liver disease. To better understand the landscape of the graft fibrosis literature, we summarize the associated epidemiology, cause, potential mechanisms, diagnosis, and complications. We additionally highlight the need for better noninvasive methods to ameliorate the management of graft fibrosis. Some examples include leveraging the microbiome, genetic, and machine learning methods to address these limitations. Overall, graft fibrosis is routinely seen by transplant clinicians, but it requires a better understanding of its underlying biology and contributors that can help inform diagnostic and therapeutic practices.

Efficacy of Autologous Skeletal Myoblast Cell Sheet Transplantation for Liver Regeneration in Liver Failure

BACKGROUND

No effective therapies have yet been established for liver regeneration in liver failure. Autologous skeletal myoblast cell sheet transplantation has been proven to improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure, and one of the mechanisms has been reported to be a paracrine effect by various growth factors associated with liver regeneration. Therefore, the present study focused on the effect of myoblast cells on liver regeneration in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

We assessed the effect of myoblast cells on the cells comprising the liver in vitro in association with liver regeneration. In addition, we examined in vivo effect of skeletal myoblast cell sheet transplantation in C57/BL/6 mouse models of liver failure, such as liver fibrosis induced by thioacetamide and hepatectomy.

RESULTS

In vitro, the myoblast cells exhibited a capacity to promote the proliferation of hepatic epithelial cells and the angiogenesis of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, and suppress the activation of hepatic stellate cells. In vivo, sheet transplantation significantly suppressed liver fibrosis in the induced liver fibrosis model and accelerated liver regeneration in the hepatectomy model.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous skeletal myoblast cell sheet transplantation significantly improved the liver failure in the in vitro and in vivo models. Sheet transplantation is expected to have the potential to be a clinically therapeutic option for liver regeneration in liver failure.

Should responsibility be used as a tiebreaker in allocation of deceased donor organs for patients suffering from alcohol-related end-stage liver disease?

There is a long-standing debate concerning the eligibility of patients suffering from alcohol-related end-stage liver disease (ARESLD) for deceased donor liver transplantation. The question of retrospective and/or prospective responsibility has been at the center of the ethical discussion. Several authors argue that these patients should at least be regarded as partly responsible for their ARESLD. At the same time, the arguments for retrospective and/or prospective responsibility have been strongly criticized, such that no consensus has been reached. A third option was proposed as a form of compromise, namely that responsibility should only be used as a tiebreaker in liver allocation. The present study provides an ethical investigation of this third option. First, we will provide an overview of the main arguments that have been offered for and against the use of responsibility as an allocation criterion. Second, we will explore the concept of responsibility as a tiebreaker in detail and discuss several types of situations, in which responsibility could be used as a tiebreaker, as well as the main ethical challenges associated with them. As we will show, an ethical justified use of responsibility as a tiebreaker is limited to a very restricted number of cases and is associated with a number of ethical concerns. For this reason, waiting time should be preferred as a tiebreaker in liver allocation, even though the criterion of waiting time, too, raises a number of equity-related concerns.