Noninvasive estimation of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: usefulness of visceral fat area measurement. Transplantation. 2009;88:575-581. [PMID: 19696642 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181b11c19]

Noninvasive Estimation of Hepatic Steatosis by Controlled Attenuation Parameter in Living Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Estimation of liver fat among living donor candidates is necessary before living donor liver transplant. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the controlled attenuation parameter compared with liver biopsy for pretransplant estimation of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included all individuals who underwent transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter and ultrasonography-guided liver biopsy as a part of donor evaluations before living donor liver transplant. Clinical and laboratory data of living donor candidates were reviewed and collected.

RESULTS

Of 49 donor candidates included in this study, 21 (42.9%) had different degrees of hepatic macrosteatosis. Of the 21 donor candidates who had hepatic steatosis in liver biopsy, 13 individuals were diagnosed to have steatosis in transient elastography. Of the 28 donor candidates without hepatic steatosis in liver biopsy, 26 individuals showed no steatosis in transient elastography (odds ratio: 21.12; 95% CI, 3.91- 114.08; P < .001). Controlled attenuation parameter was useful in discriminating presence (P = .001) and grade of hepatic steatosis (P = .009) compared with liver biopsy with good sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The controlled attenuation parameter is a noninvasive method for detection of hepatic steatosis in living donor candidates and can be used as an adjunct to liver biopsy for screening of living donor candidates before liver transplant.

Application of Deep Learning in Quantitative Analysis of 2-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

OBJECTIVES

To verify the value of deep learning in diagnosing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by comparing 3 image-processing techniques.

METHODS

A total of 240 participants were recruited and divided into 4 groups (normal, mild, moderate, and severe NAFLD groups), according to the definition and the ultrasound scoring system for NAFLD. Two-dimensional hepatic imaging was analyzed by the envelope signal, grayscale signal, and deep-learning index obtained by 3 image-processing techniques. The values of the 3 methods ranged from 0 to 65,535, 0 to 255, and 0 to 4, respectively. We compared the values among the 4 groups, draw receiver operating characteristic curves, and compared the area under the curve (AUC) values to identify the best image-processing technique.

RESULTS

The envelope signal value, grayscale value, and deep-learning index had a significant difference between groups and increased with the severity of NAFLD (P < .05). The 3 methods showed good ability (AUC > 0.7) to identify NAFLD. Meanwhile, the deep-learning index showed the superior diagnostic ability in distinguishing moderate and severe NAFLD (AUC = 0.958).

CONCLUSIONS

The envelope signal and grayscale values were vital parameters in the diagnosis of NAFLD. Furthermore, deep learning had the best sensitivity and specificity in assessing the severity of NAFLD.

Living donor liver transplantation for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A single center experience

AIM

The number of patients referred for liver transplantation (LT) with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) continues to increase, but information about living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for NASH is scarce. We conducted this study to document the details of LDLT for NASH in a Japanese LT center.

METHODS

Among all LDLT recipients in our institution from March 1996 to March 2013 (n = 425), we identified seven patients that underwent LDLT for NASH.

RESULTS

Of all the seven recipients, most of the patients (86%) were obese. The median follow-up period post-LDLT was 5.3 years. All were alive at the last follow-up. Recurrent NASH was detected in one patient (14%), and no recurrent hepatic steatosis was detected among the remaining six recipients on prospectively performed ultrasonography. No significant comorbidities were observed following donor surgery among the respective living donors during the follow-up period. We also retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with NASH-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) who were evaluated but rejected for LDLT during the same period. The reasons for rejection for LDLT were presumably associated with the nature of NAFLD/NASH in either potential recipients or donors.

CONCLUSION

The post-transplant outcome of LDLT for NASH-related ESLD in our institution was feasible, although the sample size was small. Further studies in a larger patient cohort are warranted to investigate the long-term outcome of LDLT for NASH, both for recipients and living donors.

Bedside ultrasound in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in the United States. While the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines define NAFLD as hepatic steatosis detected either on histology or imaging without a secondary cause of abnormal hepatic fat accumulation, no imaging modality is recommended as standard of care for screening or diagnosis. Bedside ultrasound has been evaluated as a non-invasive method of diagnosing NAFLD with the presence of characteristic sonographic findings. Prior studies suggest characteristic sonographic findings for NAFLD include bright hepatic echoes, increased hepatorenal echogenicity, vascular blurring of portal or hepatic vein and subcutaneous tissue thickness. These sonographic characteristics have not been shown to aid bedside clinicians easily identify potential cases of NAFLD. While sonographic findings such as attenuation of image, diffuse echogenicity, uniform heterogeneous liver, thick subcutaneous depth, and enlarged liver filling of the entire field could be identified by clinicians from bedside ultrasound. The accessibility, ease of use, and low-side effect profile of ultrasound make bedside ultrasound an appealing imaging modality in the detection of hepatic steatosis. When used with appropriate clinical risk factors and steatosis involves greater than 33% of the liver, ultrasound can reliably diagnose NAFLD. Despite the ability of ultrasound in detecting moderate hepatic steatosis, it cannot replace liver biopsy in staging the degree of fibrosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the diagnostic accuracy, utility, and limitations of ultrasound in the diagnosis of NAFLD and its potential use by clinicians in routine practices.

Quantification of hepatic steatosis: a comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance indices in candidates for living liver donation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, in a group of candidates for liver donation, the role of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) as noninvasive means to measure hepatic steatosis (HS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive candidates underwent CT and MR evaluation for liver donation within 3 weeks of liver biopsy. On CT, three methods of HS quantification were evaluated: the measurement of hepatic attenuation (CT L), the ratio of hepatic attenuation to splenic attenuation (CT L/S), and the difference between the hepatic and splenic attenuation (CT L-S). On MR, HS was reported in terms of fat signal fraction (FSF) using in-phase/opposed-phase and fat/non-fat- saturated images, with and without normalization with the spleen (T1W IP/OP FSF, T1W IP/OP FSF spleen and T2W ± FS FSF, TW2 ± FS FSF spleen). The accuracy of each imaging index in the diagnosis of HS, according to various thresholds, was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

On biopsy, 35 donors showed no significant HS (<5%); the remaining 26 showed HS ranging from 5% to 40%. With all CT and MR indices, there was a trend toward increasing diagnostic accuracy as the threshold levels of HS increased. When comparing all the indices, TW2 ± FS FSF(spl) showed higher accuracy at threshold levels of 5% and 10% of steatosis but without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In candidates for living donation, MR and CT indices are similar in estimating liver-fat content; however, MR with T2W ± FS FSF(spl) sequences shows higher accuracy when low threshold levels of steatosis (≤5% and ≤10% HS) are selected.

Living donor liver transplantation for obese patients: challenges and outcomes

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an accepted option for end-stage liver disease, particularly in countries in which there are organ shortages. However, little is known about LDLT for obese patients. We sought to determine the effects of obesity on pretransplant living donor selection for obese recipients and their outcomes. On the basis of body mass index (BMI) values, 148 patients were classified as normal weight (N), 148 were classified as overweight (OW), and 74 were classified as obese (O). O recipients had significantly greater BMI values (32.1 ± 1.6 versus 23.2 ± 1.9 kg/m(2), P < 0.001) and received larger actual grafts (918.9 ± 173 versus 839.4 ± 162 g, P = 0.002) than recipients with normal BMI values. Donors who donated to O recipients had a greater mean BMI (26.3 ± 3.8 kg/m(2)) than those who donated to N recipients (24.4 ± 3.2 kg/m(2), P = 0.001). Although O recipients were more likely to face some challenges in finding a suitable living donor, there were no differences in graft survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.955, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.474-1.924, P = 0.90] or recipient survival (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.56-1.5, P = 0.67) between the 3 groups according to an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. There were no significant differences in posttransplant complication rates between the 3 recipient groups or in the morbidity rates for the donors who donated to O recipients versus the donors who donated to OW and N recipients (P = 0.26). Therefore, we recommend that obese patients undergo pretransplant evaluations. If they are adequately evaluated and selected, they should be considered for LDLT.

Hepatic steatosis in living liver donor candidates: preoperative assessment by using breath-hold triple-echo MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of both breath-hold T2*-corrected triple-echo spoiled gradient-echo water-fat separation magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (triple-echo imaging) and high-speed T2-corrected multiecho hydrogen 1 ((1)H) MR spectroscopy in the assessment of macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donor candidates by using histologic assessment as a reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study with waiver of the need to obtain informed consent. One hundred eighty-two liver donor candidates who had undergone preoperative triple-echo imaging and single-voxel (3 × 3 × 3 cm) MR spectroscopy performed with a 3.0-T imaging unit and who had also undergone histologic evaluation of macrovesicular steatosis were included in this study. In part 1 of the study (n = 84), the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to detect substantial (≥10%) macrovesicular steatosis. In part 2 of the study, with a different patient group (n = 98), diagnostic performance was evaluated by using the diagnostic cutoff values determined in part 1 of the study.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients of triple-echo MR imaging and MR spectroscopy with macrovesicular steatosis were 0.886 and 0.887, respectively. The areas under the ROC curve for detection of substantial macrovesicular steatosis were 0.959 and 0.988, with cutoff values of 4.93% and 5.79%, respectively, and without a significant difference (P = .328). In the part 2 study group, sensitivity and specificity were 90.9% (10 of 11) and 86.2% (75 of 87) for triple-echo MR imaging and 90.9% (10 of 11) and 86.2% (75 of 87) for MR spectroscopy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Either breath-hold triple-echo MR imaging or MR spectroscopy can be used to detect substantial macrovesicular steatosis in living liver donor candidates. In the future, this may allow selective biopsy in candidates who are expected to have substantial macrovesicular steatosis on the basis of MR-based hepatic fat fraction.

Safe use of highly steatotic livers by utilizing a donor/recipient clinical algorithm

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical outcomes associated with the utilization of highly steatotic donor livers utilizing a specific donor/recipient matching algorithm. This was a prospective, observational, single-center, 10-yr follow-up study. Highly steatotic livers were utilized according to a donor/recipient algorithm that guided the surgeon to use highly steatotic donor organs judiciously in low-risk recipients. This study initially compared fat assessment based on frozen-section Ehrlich's hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to reperfusion biopsy fat assessment and demonstrated that H&E is an insensitive analysis to determine degree of steatosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on donor steatosis (group 1: <30% steatosis, group 2: 30-60% steatosis, group 3: >60% steatosis), and clinical outcomes were assessed. One hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis. Patients that received severely steatotic livers (>60% fat) showed increased reperfusion liver injury and delayed return of liver function in the early postoperative period, demonstrated by biochemical markers. However, there were no differences in primary non-function, postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient and graft survival. Using rigorous donor/recipient matching through a detailed algorithm, these data demonstrate that normal liver allograft outcomes are not superior to those in highly steatotic grafts.

Impact of the donor body mass index on the survival of pediatric liver transplant recipients and post-transplant obesity

In adult liver transplant recipients, the donor body mass index (dBMI) is associated with posttransplant obesity but not with graft or patient survival. Because of the obesity epidemic in the United States and the already limited supply of liver donors, clarifying whether the dBMI affects pediatric outcomes is important. United Network for Organ Sharing data for pediatric liver transplants in the United States (1990-2010) were evaluated. Data on transplants performed between 2004 and 2010 (n = 3788) were used for survival analyses with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models and for posttransplant obesity analyses with generalized estimating equations. For children receiving adult donor livers, a dBMI of 25 to <35 kg/m(2) was not associated with graft or patient survival in univariate or multivariate analyses. A dBMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2) increased the risk of graft loss [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.29-5.01, P = 0.007] and death (HR = 3.56, 95% CI = 1.64-7.72, P = 0.001). For pediatric donors, the dBMI was not associated with graft loss or mortality in a univariate or multivariate analysis. An overweight or obese donor was not a risk factor for posttransplant obesity. Overweight and obesity are common among liver transplant donors. This analysis suggests that for adult donors, a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to <35 kg/m(2) should not by itself be a contraindication to liver donation. Severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)) in adult donors increased the risk of graft loss and mortality, even after adjustments for recipient, donor, and transplant risk factors. Posttransplant obesity was not associated with the dBMI in this analysis. Further research is needed to clarify the impact of donor obesity on pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Obesity-independent association of human adenovirus Ad37 seropositivity with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

OBJECTIVE

Adenoviruses Ad36 and Ad37 increase adiposity in animals and are associated with obesity in humans; effects on the liver have been reported. The association of Adenovirus Ad36 seropositivity (Ad36+) with obesity but not with the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been previously shown. We investigate whether nondiabetic Ad37+ patients show a different prevalence of NAFLD and ultrasound Bright Liver score.

PATIENTS

A total of 268 adult nondiabetic patients (146 men, 122 women) were included after lifestyle counseling including a personalized Mediterranean diet, increase in physical activity, and smoking withdrawal. After an Ad37+/Ad36+ assay, overweight obesity, insulin resistance, C-reactive protein, and bright liver prevalence and severity were compared according to Ad37+.

RESULTS

Sixty-five of 268 patients were Ad37+ and 82/268 patients were both Ad37 seronegative (Ad37-) and Ad36-. The prevalence of obesity, defined as body mass index≥30, was not significantly different in Ad37+ (11/65; 16.9%) vs. Ad37- (15/82; 18.2%) patients; Bright Liver was present in 22/65 (33.8%) Ad37+ patients vs. 13/82 (15.8%) Ad37- patients (P<0.019). By odds ratio (OR), a consistent risk for NAFLD was associated with Ad37+, greater insulin resistance, and C-reactive protein. By a predictive multiple linear regression model, 40.0% of variance toward NAFLD and 50.4% toward the severity of Bright Liver score was explained significantly and independently by Ad37+ and by body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Ad37+ status in nondiabetic patients on an appropriate diet is significantly associated with NAFLD; because fatty liver improves even without weight loss by a "healthy" diet, and not only by lower food caloric intake, Ad37+ may be an adjunctive hallmark of an unfavorable clinical-metabolic profile, if not a causative factor of NAFLD.

US cannot be used to predict the presence or severity of hepatic steatosis in severely obese adolescents

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for the assessment of hepatic steatosis in severely obese adolescents, with proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy as the reference standard, and to provide insight on the influence of prevalence on predictive values by calculating positive and negative posttest probabilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was institutional review board approved. All participants, and/or their legal representatives, gave written informed consent. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the overall presence of steatosis and for the presence of substantial (moderate to severe) steatosis. Positive and negative posttest probabilities were calculated and plotted against prevalence.

RESULTS

A total of 104 children (47 male, 57 female) were prospectively included. Mean age was 14.5 years (range, 8.3-18.9 years) and mean age-adjusted standard deviation body mass index (BMI) score (BMI z score) was 3.3 (range, 2.6-4.1). The overall prevalence of hepatic steatosis was 46.2% (48 of 104). Sensitivity of US was 85.4% (41 of 48), specificity was 55.4% (31 of 56), PPV was 62.1% (41 of 66), and NPV was 81.6% (31 of 38). The prevalence of substantial steatosis was 15.4% (16 of 104), with US sensitivity of 75.0% (12 of 16) and specificity of 87.5% (77 of 88). PPV was 52.2% (12 of 23) and NPV was 95.1% (77 of 81). Plotting of posttest probabilities against prevalence for both disease degrees demonstrated how disease prevalence influences US accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Positive US results in severely obese adolescents cannot be used to accurately predict the presence and severity of hepatic steatosis, and additional imaging is required. Negative US results exclude the presence of substantial steatosis with acceptable accuracy. Steatosis prevalence differs among specific populations, strongly influencing posttest probabilities.

Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: a meta-analysis

Ultrasonography is a widely accessible imaging technique for the detection of fatty liver, but the reported accuracy and reliability have been inconsistent across studies. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver. We used MEDLINE and Embase from October 1967 to March 2010. Studies that provided cross-tabulations of ultrasonography versus histology or standard imaging techniques, or that provided reliability data for ultrasonography, were included. Study variables were independently abstracted by three reviewers and double checked by one reviewer. Forty-nine (4720 participants) studies were included for the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of ultrasound for the detection of moderate-severe fatty liver, compared to histology (gold standard), were 84.8% (95% confidence interval: 79.5-88.9), 93.6% (87.2-97.0), 13.3 (6.4-27.6), and 0.16 (0.12-0.22), respectively. The area under the summary receiving operating characteristics curve was 0.93 (0.91-0.95). Reliability of ultrasound for the detection of fatty liver showed kappa statistics ranging from 0.54 to 0.92 for intrarater reliability and from 0.44 to 1.00 for interrater reliability. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound was similar to that of other imaging techniques (i.e., computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Statistical heterogeneity was present even after stratification for multiple clinically relevant characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography allows for reliable and accurate detection of moderate-severe fatty liver, compared to histology. Because of its low cost, safety, and accessibility, ultrasound is likely the imaging technique of choice for screening for fatty liver in clinical and population settings.

The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis

Objective

To meta-analyse the diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and ¹H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis.

Methods

From a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane (up to November 2009), articles were selected that investigated the diagnostic performance imaging techniques for evaluating hepatic steatosis with histopathology as the reference standard. Cut-off values for the presence of steatosis on liver biopsy were subdivided into four groups: (1) >0, >2 and >5% steatosis; (2) >10, >15 and >20%; (3) >25, >30 and >33%; (4) >50, >60 and >66%. Per group, summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity were calculated. The natural-logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR) was used as a single indicator of test performance.

Results

46 articles were included. Mean sensitivity estimates for subgroups were 73.3–90.5% (US), 46.1–72.0% (CT), 82.0–97.4% (MRI) and 72.7–88.5% (¹H-MRS). Mean specificity ranges were 69.6–85.2% (US), 88.1–94.6% (CT), 76.1–95.3% (MRI) and 92.0–95.7% (¹H-MRS). Overall performance (lnDOR) of MRI and ¹H-MRS was better than that for US and CT for all subgroups, with significant differences in groups 1 and 2.

Conclusion

MRI and ¹H-MRS can be considered techniques of choice for accurate evaluation of hepatic steatosis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1905-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.