Obesity was associated with inferior outcomes in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant

Possible Sources of Trace Metals in Obese Females Living in Informal Settlements near Industrial Sites around Gauteng, South Africa

Trace metals have been reported in the literature to be associated with obesity. Exposure to some trace metals such as Mn, Cr, Ni, Cd, and Pb may pose a serious health risk to individuals living around a polluted environment. The present study assessed the levels of trace metals in the blood of obese females living around industrial areas in Gauteng, South Africa. The study was carried out using a mixed method approach. Only females with a BMI ≥ 30.0 were considered. A total of 120 obese females participated in the study (site 1: 40-industrial area, site 2: 40-industrial area, and site 3: 40-residential area), aged 18-45 and not in menopause. Blood samples were analysed for trace metals content using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The mean concentrations of trace metals were in the order Pb > Mn > Cr > Co > As > Cd (site 1), Pb > Mn > Co > As > Cd (site 2), and Mn > Cr > Co > As > Pb > Cd (site 3). The blood Mn from site 1 ranged from 6.79 µg/L-33.99 µg/L, and the mean differences obtained from the participants from different sites were significant (p < 0.01). The blood levels of Mn, Pb, Cr, Co, As, and Cd were above the recommended limits set by the WHO in some of the participants. The present study noted, among others, closeness to industrial areas, lifestyle decisions such as the use of tobacco products by their partners indoors, and the method used for cooking as factors that might have accounted for the blood levels of Mn, Pb, Cd and Co. The study showed that there is a need for constant monitoring of the levels of trace metals in the blood of those living in these areas.

Modern indications for referral for kidney and pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreas transplantation (PTx) is currently the only therapy that can predictably achieve sustained euglycemia independent of exogenous insulin administration in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. This procedure involves a complex abdominal operation and lifetime dependence on immunosuppressive medications. Therefore, PTx is most frequently performed in combination with other organs, usually a kidney transplant for end stage diabetic nephropathy. Less frequently, solitary PTx may be indicated in patients with potentially life-threatening complications of diabetes mellitus. There remains confusion and misperceptions regarding indications and timing of patient referral for PTx.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, the referral, evaluation, and listing process for PTx is described, including a detailed discussion of candidate assessment, indications, contraindications, and outcomes.

SUMMARY

Because the progression of diabetic kidney disease may be less predictable than other forms of kidney failure, early referral for planning of renal and/or pancreas transplantation is paramount to optimize patient care and allow for possible preemptive transplantation.

Different timing and risk factors of cause-specific pancreas graft loss after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation

In cases after pancreas transplantation (PTx), the pancreas graft might be lost for various reasons, including a pancreatoduodenal graft-related complication or patient death with a functioning graft. Although the causes seem to have distinct characteristics, the causes of pancreas graft loss have not been characterized. This study aimed to characterize the causes of pancreas graft loss by analyzing data from a Japanese nationwide registry. This study included 391 patients who received simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation among 461 patients with PTx during the study period in approved institutions in Japan. We characterized each cause in terms of the timing of the cause-specific graft loss and preoperative factors associated with graft loss based on nationwide data from a Japanese nationwide registry. Among the 391 cases, 113 lost the pancreas graft due to patient death with a functioning graft (DWFG; n = 34, 44.2%), graft thrombus (n = 22, 28.6%), or chronic rejection (CR; n = 7, 9.1%). Average (± standard deviation) time from PTx to graft loss due to DWFG, graft thrombus, and CR was 3.70 ± 4.36, 0.02 ± 0.01, and 2.37 ± 2.08 years, respectively. Duration of type 1 diabetes mellitus and donor body mass index were significantly associated with pancreas graft loss due to DWFG and graft thrombus, respectively. This characterization showed that the timing and preoperative factors associated with pancreas graft loss were significantly different for different causes of graft loss. These results may inform PTx follow-up protocols to ensure that appropriate care is based on the cause of graft loss.

Pancreas Transplantation in Minorities including Patients with a Type 2 Diabetes Phenotype

Background: Prior to year 2000, the majority of pancreas transplants (PTx) were performed as simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKTs) in Caucasian adults with end stage renal failure secondary to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who were middle-aged. In the new millennium, improving outcomes have led to expanded recipient selection that includes patients with a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) phenotype, which excessively affects minority populations. Methods: Using PubMed® to identify appropriate citations, we performed a literature review of PTx in minorities and in patients with a T2DM phenotype. Results: Mid-term outcomes with SPKT in patients with uremia and circulating C-peptide levels (T2DMphenotype) are comparable to those patients with T1DM although there may exist a selection bias in the former group. Excellent outcomes with SPKT suggests that the pathophysiology of T2DM is heterogeneous with elements consisting of both insulin deficiency and resistance related to beta-cell failure. As a result, increasing endogenous insulin (Cp) production following PTx may lead to freedom checking blood sugars or taking insulin, better metabolic counter-regulation, and improvements in quality of life and life expectancy compared to other available treatment options. Experience with solitary PTx for T2DM or in minorities is limited but largely mirrors the trends reported in SPKT. Conclusions: PTx is a viable treatment option in patients with pancreas endocrine failure who are selected appropriately regardless of diabetes type or recipient race. This review will summarize data that unconventional patient populations with insulin-requiring diabetes may gain value from PTx with an emphasis on contemporary experiences and appropriate selection in minorities in the new millennium.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Donor Predictors of Donor Pancreas Retrieval and Subsequent Solid Pancreas Transplantation in Australia and New Zealand from 2007 to 2016

BACKGROUND

Donor characteristics help guide donor pancreas acceptance for solid pancreas-kidney transplantation; however, these criteria vary worldwide. Such variation could result in nonuse of potentially transplantable organs. Using a registry cohort, we identified donor characteristics associated with donor pancreas retrieval and subsequent solid pancreas transplantation in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

Australia and New Zealand Organ Donor registry donor data from 2007 to 2016 were used to define cohort 1 (all donors authorized for pancreas retrieval) and cohort 2 (all retrieved donor pancreata considered for solid pancreas transplantation). Donor factors significantly associated with donor pancreas retrieval (cohort 1) and solid pancreas transplantation of retrieved donor pancreata (cohort 2) were determined via multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Nonretrieval and nonuse of solid organ donor pancreas increased throughout the study period, and nonauthorization for pancreas donation remained stable. Donor body mass index, sex, and viral serology were associated with donor pancreas retrieval but not transplantation. Donor age, cause of death, donation after brain death status, terminal serum creatinine, and donor region were associated with both donor pancreas retrieval and acceptance for solid pancreas transplantation with donation after brain death status being the strongest predictor for both outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age, cause of death, donation after brain death status, terminal serum creatinine, and donor region were associated with both donor pancreas retrieval and subsequent transplantation in Australia and New Zealand. Subsequent correlation of these factors with post-pancreas transplant outcomes would help guide pancreas transplant decisions and minimize nonuse of potentially usable donor pancreata.

Solid pancreas transplant outcomes with increased donor and recipient ages compared to reference ages: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Increased recipient and donor age are associated with worse solid organ pancreas transplant outcomes. However, donor and recipient age criteria vary between jurisdictions. We systematically reviewed studies reporting the association between transplanting older recipients and donors beyond current Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) limits with solid pancreas transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Studies comparing transplant outcomes between a reference-age and an older-age donor (>45 years) or recipient (≥50 years) cohort for solid pancreas transplantation were included. Primary outcomes were pancreas/kidney graft and patient survival at one and five years. Secondary outcomes were post-transplant complications (graft thrombosis, acute rejection and relaparotomy rates).

RESULTS

11 studies were included (two studies assessing solid pancreas outcomes between older vs reference-aged donors and nine studies assessing outcomes between older vs reference-aged recipients). Seven of 11 studies were judged to be at high risk of bias. Primary and secondary outcomes were not significantly different between recipient age groups in nine studies. A sensitivity analysis of older vs reference-aged studies excluding studies at high risk of bias also showed non-inferior primary and secondary outcomes at one year. Two studies comparing outcomes by donor age showed worse graft survival but non-inferior patient survival with older donors.

CONCLUSION

Increased donor or recipient age alone should not absolutely contraindicate solid pancreas transplantation, especially if other risk predictors are minimised. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Frailty in Pancreas Transplantation

There are a variety of definitions and criteria used in clinical practice to define frailty. In the absence of a gold-standard definition, frailty has been operationally defined as meeting 3 out of 5 phenotypic criteria indicating compromised function: low grip strength, low energy, slowed walking speed, low physical activity, and unintentional weight loss. Frailty is a common problem in solid organ transplant candidates who are in the process of being listed for a transplant, as well as after transplantation. Patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease (CKD) are known to be at increased risk of being frail. As pancreas transplantation is exclusively performed among patients with diabetes and the majority of them also have CKD, pancreas transplant candidates and recipients are at high risk of being frail. Sarcopenia, fatigue, low walking speed, low physical activity, and unintentional weight loss, which are some of the phenotypes of frailty, are very prevalent in this population. In various solid organs, frail patients are less likely to be listed or transplanted and have high waitlist mortality. Even after a transplant, they have increased risk of prolonged hospitalization, readmission, and delayed graft function. Given the negative impact of frailty on solid organ transplants, we believe that frailty would have a similar or even worse impact on pancreas transplantation. Due to the paucity of data specifically among pancreas transplant recipients, here we include frailty data from patients with CKD, diabetes, and various solid organ transplant recipients.

Single center results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes

Studies have found similar outcomes of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney transplantation (SPKT) in patients with Type 2 (T2D) and Type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, there are scarce data evaluating the association of recipient factors such as age, BMI, or pretransplant insulin requirements with outcomes, thus the criteria for the optimal recipient selection remains unclear. In this study, 284 T1D and 39 T2D patients, who underwent SPKT between 2006 and 2017 with 1 year of follow-up at minimum, were assessed for potential relationship of pretransplant BMI and insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes and pancreatic graft failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar rates of freedom from posttransplant diabetes (94.7% T2D vs. 92.3% T1D at 1 yr, and 88.1% T2D vs. 81.1% T1D at 5 yrs) and graft survival (89.7% T2D vs. 90.4% T1D at 1 yr, and 89.7% T2D vs. 81.2% T1D at 5 yrs). There was no significant association between BMI or pretransplant insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes occurrence in either T1D (p = .10, .43, respectively) or T2D (p = .12, .63) patients in the cohort; or with graft failure (T1D: p = .40, .09; T2D: p = .71, .28). These observations suggest a less restricted approach to selective use of SPKT in patients with T2D.

Working towards an ERAS Protocol for Pancreatic Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) initially started in the early 2000s as a series of protocols to improve the perioperative care of surgical patients. They aimed to increase patient satisfaction while reducing postoperative complications and postoperative length of stay. Despite these protocols being widely adopted in many fields of surgery, they are yet to be adopted in pancreatic transplantation: a high-risk surgery with often prolonged length of postoperative stay and high rate of complications. We have analysed the literature in pancreatic and transplantation surgery to identify the necessary preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative components of an ERAS pathway in pancreas transplantation.

Sleeve gastrectomy enables simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation in severely obese recipients

BACKGROUND

Obesity adversely affects wait-listing and precludes patients with concomitant end-stage renal disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus from getting a simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK).

OBJECTIVE

To analyze safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) before SPK in severely obese type I diabetics.

METHODS

We assessed weight curve, complications, and graft function of three patients who underwent LSG before SPK.

RESULTS

LSG was uneventful in all patients. Body mass index dropped from 38.4 (range 35.7 - 39.9) before LSG to 28.5 (26.8 - 30.9) until SPK, with a mean loss of 25.8% (22.4 - 32.3). Interval between LSG and SPK was 364.3 (173 - 587) days. Pancreas and kidney graft function was excellent, with 100% insulin-free and dialysis-free survival over a mean follow-up of 3.6 (2.9 - 4.5) years. A1C dropped from 7% (6.3 - 8.2) before LSG to 4.9% (4.7 - 5.3) and 4.8% (4.5 - 5.1) 1 and 2 years after SPK, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LSG before SPK is safe and effective to enable severely obese type I diabetics to receive a lifesaving transplant. This is the first study analyzing the role of bariatric surgery before simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation.

Single center results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes

Studies have found similar outcomes of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney transplantation (SPKT) in patients with Type 2 (T2D) and Type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, there are scarce data evaluating the association of recipient factors such as age, BMI, or pretransplant insulin requirements with outcomes, thus the criteria for the optimal recipient selection remains unclear. In this study, 284 T1D and 39 T2D patients, who underwent SPKT between 2006 and 2017 with 1 year of follow-up at minimum, were assessed for potential relationship of pretransplant BMI and insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes and pancreatic graft failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar rates of freedom from posttransplant diabetes (94.7% T2D vs. 92.3% T1D at 1 yr, and 88.1% T2D vs. 81.1% T1D at 5 yrs) and graft survival (89.7% T2D vs. 90.4% T1D at 1 yr, and 89.7% T2D vs. 81.2% T1D at 5 yrs). There was no significant association between BMI or pretransplant insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes occurrence in either T1D (p = .10, .43, respectively) or T2D (p = .12, .63) patients in the cohort; or with graft failure (T1D: p = .40, .09; T2D: p = .71, .28). These observations suggest a less restricted approach to selective use of SPKT in patients with T2D.

Robotic pancreas transplantation: the state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Robotic pancreas transplantation is a novel procedure that aims to reduce surgical invasiveness, and thereby limit complications related to the surgical access. Given that few centers are providing robotic transplantation, this review serves as a state of the science article to outline early experiences and highlight areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreas transplantation results in relatively high rates of wound and other surgical complications that are known to deleteriously impact outcomes. The minimally invasive, robotic-assisted approach decreases wound complications. Because of the obesity epidemic, overweight and obese status is encountered in an increasing number of transplant candidates. These candidates are subject to increased wound-related complications and most benefit from a robotic approach. The first clinical reports on laparoscopic, robotic-assisted kidney and pancreas transplantation indicate a significant decrease in wound complications and excellent outcomes in obese patients otherwise denied access to transplantation.

SUMMARY

With excellent results achieved in surgically challenging patients and further accumulation of experience, laparoscopic, robotic-assisted pancreas and kidney transplantation may evolve to a new standard approach.

Pancreas Transplantation: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Pancreas transplantation treats insulin-dependent diabetes with or without concurrent end-stage renal disease. Pancreas transplantation increases survival versus no transplant, increases survival when performed as simultaneous pancreas-kidney versus deceased-donor kidney alone, and improves quality of life. Careful donor and recipient selection are paramount to good outcomes. Several technical variations exist for implantation: portal versus systemic vascular drainage and jejunal versus duodenal versus bladder exocrine drainage. Complications are most frequently technical in the first year and immunologic thereafter. Graft rejection is challenging to diagnose and is treated selectively. Islet cell transplantation currently has inferior outcomes to whole-organ pancreas transplantation.

Solid pancreas transplant: Pushing forward

Pancreas transplant has evolved significantly in recent years. It has now become a viable treatment option on type 1 diabetic patients with poorly controlled diabetes on conventional treatment, insulin intolerance, hypoglycaemia unawareness, brittle diabetes and/ or end-stage kidney disease. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of pancreas transplant historical origins and current barriers to broader utilization of pancreata for transplant, with a focus on areas for future improvement to better pancreas transplant care. Donor pancreata remain underutilized; pancreatic allograft discard rates remain close to 30% in the United States. Donations after cardiac death (DCD) pancreata are seldom procured. Study groups from Europe and the United Kingdom showed that procurement professionalization and standardization of technique, as well as development of independent regional procurement teams might increase organ procurement efficiency, decrease discards and increase pancreatic allograft utilization. Pancreas transplant programs should consider exploring pancreas procurement opportunities on DCD and obese donors. Selected type 2 diabetics should be considered for pancreas transplant. Longer follow-up studies need to be performed in order to ascertain the long-term cardiovascular and quality of life benefits following pancreas transplant; the outcomes of which might eventually spearhead advocacy towards broader application of pancreas transplant among diabetics.

Pancreas grafts for transplantation from donors with hypertension: an analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database

BACKGROUND

With the rising demands for pancreas transplantation, surgeons are trying to extend the donors pool and set up a more appropriate assessment system. We aim to evaluate the effect of donor hypertension on recipient overall and graft survival rates.

METHODS

Twenty-four thousand one hundred ninety-two pancreas transplantation patients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were subdivided into hypertension group (HTN, n = 1531) and non-hypertension group (non-HTN, n = 22,661) according to the hypertension status of donors. Recipient overall and graft survival were analyzed and compared by log rank test, and hazard ratios of predictors were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Patient overall and graft survival of non-HTN group were higher than that of the HTN group (both p < 0.001). The duration of hypertension negatively influenced both overall and graft survival rates (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that hypertension was an independent factor for reduced survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.18; p < 0.001). Other independent factors included recipient body mass index (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p < 0.001) and transplant type (pancreas after kidney transplants / pancreas transplant alone vs. simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants; HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 134-1.55; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor hypertension is an independent factor for recipient survival after pancreas transplantation and could be considered in donor selection as well as post-transplant surveillance in clinical practice.

Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Versus Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Alone: an Outcome-Driven Choice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The choice of optimum transplant in a patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and chronic kidney disease stage V (CKD V) is not clear. The purpose of this review was to investigate this in more detail-in particular the choice between a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), including recent evidence, to aid clinicians and their patients in making an informed choice in their care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Analyses of large databases have recently shown SPKT to have better survival rates than a LDKT in the long-term, despite an early increase in morbidity and mortality in SPKT recipients. This survival advantage has only been shown in those SPKT recipients with a functioning pancreas and not those who had early pancreas graft loss. The choice of SPKT or LDKT should not be based on patient and graft survival outcomes alone. Individual patient circumstances, preferences, and comorbidities, among other factors should form an important part of the decision-making process. In general, an SPKT should be considered in those patients not on dialysis and LDKT in those nearing or already on dialysis.

Robotic Pancreas Transplantation

Obesity is considered a relative contraindication to pancreas transplantation due to an overall increased risk in wound-related complications and surgical site infections. The rationale for performing pancreas transplantation in a minimally invasive fashion is to reduce these risks, which can be associated with inferior patient and graft survival following pancreas transplantation in morbidly obese patients. At the University of Illinois at Chicago, the initial series of robotic-assisted pancreas transplantation in obese patient with type 1 and 2 diabetes has been performed. In this article, surgical technique and world experience in robotic pancreas transplantation are described.

Links between a biomarker profile, cold ischaemic time and clinical outcome following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

In sepsis, trauma and major surgery, where an explicit physiological insult leads to a significant systemic inflammatory response, the acute evolution of biomarkers have been delineated. In these settings, Interleukin (IL) -6 and TNF-α are often the first pro-inflammatory markers to rise, stimulating production of acute phase proteins followed by peaks in anti-inflammatory markers. Patients undergoing SPKT as a result of diabetic complications already have an inflammatory phenotype as a result of uraemia and glycaemia. How this inflammatory response is affected further by the trauma of major transplant surgery and how this may impact on graft survival is unknown, despite the recognised pro-inflammatory cytokines' detrimental effects on islet cell function. The aim of the study was to determine the evolution of biomarkers in omentum and serum in the peri-operative period following SPKT. The biochemical findings were correlated to clinical outcomes. Two omental biopsies were taken (at the beginning and end of surgery) and measured for CD68+ and CD206+ antibodies (M1 and M2 macrophages respectively). Serum was measured within the first 72 h post-SPKT for pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL -6, -10 and TNF-α), inflammatory markers (WCC and CRP) and endocrine markers (insulin, C-peptide, glucagon and resistin). 46 patients were recruited to the study. Levels of M1 (CD68+) and M2 (CD206+) macrophages were significantly raised at the end of surgery compared to the beginning (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001 respectively). Levels of C-peptide, insulin and glucagon were significantly raised 30 min post pancreas perfusion compared to baseline and were also significantly negatively related to prolonged cold ischaemic time (CIT) (p < 0.05). CRP levels correlated significantly with the Post-Operative Morbidity Survey (p < 0.05). The temporal inflammatory marker signature after SPKT is comparable to the pattern observed following other physiological insults. Unique to this study, we find that CIT is significantly related to early pancreatic endocrine function. In addition, this study suggests a predictive value of CRP in peri-operative morbidity following SPKT.

Pancreas transplantation in unconventional recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in surgical technique and immunosuppression have significantly improved outcomes after pancreas transplantation, and as a result pancreas transplants increasingly are being performed for indications other than type 1 diabetes mellitus. This review summarizes the current literature on pancreas transplantation in unconventional recipient populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

An increasing body of work suggests that pancreas transplantation can be performed with good outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and those 50 years of age and older. Obesity appears detrimental to patient and pancreas graft survival, and bariatric surgery prior to transplantation may be of increasing interest and relevance. There are limited data yielding mixed outcomes on pancreas transplantation in patients with HIV or hepatitis C virus. However, rapidly improving antiviral therapies are prolonging survival in patients with HIV and chronic hepatitis C virus infections and may increase the number of candidates available for pancreas transplantation in these populations in the future.

SUMMARY

Despite limited literature in these patient populations, pancreas transplantation may be a viable treatment option for endocrine pancreas failure in appropriately selected patients regardless of disease cause or age.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Experience of the Doce de Octubre Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) constitutes the therapy of choice for diabetes type1 or type2 associated with end-stage renal disease, because is the only proven method to restore normo-glicemic control in the diabetic patient.

METHODS

Retrospective and descriptive study of a series of 175 patients who underwent SPKT from March 1995 to April 2016. We analyze donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative variables and immunosuppression, post-transplant morbi-mortality, patient and graft survival, and risk factors related with patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Median age of the donors was 28years and mean age of recipients was 38.8±7.3years, being 103 males and 72 females. Enteric drainage of the exocrine pancreas was performed in 113 patients and bladder drainage in 62. Regarding post-transplant complications, the overall rate of infections was 70.3%; graft pancreatitis 26.3%; intraabdominal bleeding 17.7%; graft thrombosis 12.6%; and overall pancreas graft rejection 10.9%. The causes of mortality were mainly cardiovascular and infectious complications. Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5-year were 95.4%, 93% and 92.4%, respectively, and pancreas graft survival at 1, 3 and 5-year were 81.6%, 77.9% y 72.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our 20-year experience of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, the morbidity rate, and 5-year patient and pancreas graft survivals were similar to those previously reported from the international pancreas transplant registries.

Impact of Sex Disparities on Outcomes of Living-Donor Kidney Transplant in Egypt: Data of 979 Patients

OBJECTIVES

Renal transplant is the criterion standard for treatment of end-stage renal disease. The effects of disparities between men and women on renal transplant outcomes have been evaluated in many studies but with debatable results. It has been suggested that female kidney donors have poor outcomes after transplant compared with male kidney donors, especially when implanted in a male recipient. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of sex on living-donor kidney transplant outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 979 patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplant from January 2000 to December 2010 at a single center were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to recipient and donor sex: male donor-to-male recipient (n = 307), male donor-to-female recipient (n = 132), female donor-to-male recipient (n = 411), and female donor-to-female recipient (n = 129). We compared the demographic characteristics, posttransplant rejection and complications, and graft and patient survival rates among the groups.

RESULTS

Male recipients were older than female recipients, whereas male donors were younger than female donors (P < .001). No statistically significant differences were shown regarding recipient body mass index, ischemia time and time to diuresis, and acute and chronic rejection rates between the groups. Graft (P = .947) and patient (P = .421) survival rates were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor and recipient sex had no significant effect on outcomes of living-donor renal allograft recipients.

High-Fat Diet-Induced Obesity Enhances Allograft Rejection

BACKGROUND

Obesity promotes a state of low-grade inflammation that exacerbates chronic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma and inflammatory bowel disease. In transplantation, the survival of organs transplanted into obese patients is reduced compared with allografts in lean recipients. However, whether this is due to increased alloimmunity remains to be addressed conclusively.

METHODS

We used a mouse model of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity and assessed immune responses to allogeneic stimulation in vitro, allogeneic splenocyte immunization in vivo, and allogeneic heart transplantation.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that HFD altered the composition and phenotype of splenic antigen-presenting cells that led to their enhanced capacity to stimulate T cells. Immunization with allogeneic splenocytes in vivo resulted in increased alloreactivity, as determined by IFNγ production. Moreover, cardiac allograft rejection in HFD mice was modestly accelerated compared to aged-matched control animals fed a low-fat diet, correlating with enhanced alloreactive T cell function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the increased alloresponse triggered by HFD-induced obesity and its negative impact on transplant outcome.

The significance of pre-operative coronary interventions on outcome after pancreas transplantation

Pancreas transplant candidates are at very high risk of coronary vascular disease. We hypothesized that the requirement for pre-operative coronary intervention (PCI) may be associated with an adverse impact on short- and long-term outcomes. Retrospective analysis of 366 consecutive primary pancreas transplants was undertaken. Outcomes were compared between recipients who had undergone PCI (n = 48) and those who had not (n = 318). In 48% (23/48) of instances, the PCI was initiated by the transplant cardiology evaluation. The recipients undergoing PCI were older than those not undergoing PCI (47.6 yr vs. 41.9 yr, respectively, p < 0.0001). Although not statistically significant, there was a higher rate of post-operative major cardiovascular events (MCVE) in the PCI group (10.4%) compared with those not undergoing PCI (4.7%) (RR [95% CI]: 2.0 [0.90-4.5]; p = 0.17). In the long term, there were no differences in the rate of death with graft function (p = 0.77) or rejection (p = 0.17). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to patient (p = 0.54), kidney (p = 0.76), or pancreas (p = 0.63) graft survival. PCI is not a risk factor for short-term perioperative events, and long-term transplant outcomes are equivalent to patients not requiring PCI. PCI, by itself, should not be considered a contraindication for pancreas transplantation, but should raise awareness of perioperative risk.

A prospective cohort study of risk prediction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Current risk prediction scoring systems in pancreas transplantation are limited to organ factors and are specific to predicting graft outcome. They do not consider recipient factors or inform regarding recipient morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of commonly used general surgical risk prediction models (P-POSSUM [Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity], MODS [multiple organ dysfunction score], Charlson co-morbidity index, revised cardiac risk index, ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] grade and Waterlow score), and to correlate them with total length of hospital stay (LOS) and critical care unit (CCU) LOS, important surrogate markers of patient outcome.

METHODS

All risk prediction scores were calculated prospectively for all simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients from November 2011 to October 2013, and correlated with outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 57 SPK transplant recipients were analysed. The mean age was 42.0 years (standard deviation [SD]: 7.60 years), 27 (52%) were male and the mean body mass index was 25.43kg/m(2) (SD: 3.11kg/m(2)). The mean pancreas and kidney cold ischaemic times were 703 minutes (SD: 182 minutes) and 850 minutes (SD: 192 minutes) respectively. The median total LOS and mean CCU LOS was 17 days (range: 8-79 days) and 7 days (SD: 4.04 days) respectively. When correlated with risk prediction scores, Waterlow score was the only significant predictor of total LOS and CCU LOS (p<0.001 [Spearman's correlation] and p=0.001 [Pearson's correlation] respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative risk prediction plays an important part in planning perioperative care. To date, no validated risk prediction scoring system exists for SPK transplantation. This prospective study indicates that Waterlow score identifies high risk individuals and has value in the prediction of outcome following SPK transplantation.

Long-term Effects of Delayed Graft Function on Pancreas Graft Survival After Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Compared with the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation, DGF after pancreas transplantation has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

We retrospectively verified the impact of DGF on long-term pancreas graft survival in surgically successful cases. Pancreas graft failure was defined by the recipient's return to exogenous insulin administration.

RESULTS

Between May 2004 and April 2013, we performed 135 technically successful primary pancreas transplantations. Delayed graft function was defined as a total cumulative insulin requirement of 19 UI or greater within postoperative 7 days. Of the 135 recipients in our study cohort, 47 (34.8%) developed DGF after the pancreas transplantation. By multivariate analysis, DGF was found to be associated with a donor age of 30 years or older (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-7.69; P=0.003) and the increased ratio of body mass index in a recipient to a donor (odds ratio, 26.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.53-270.0; P=0.006). There was a trend toward higher acute rejection (P=0.622) and mortality (P=0.49) rates in recipients with versus without DGF, although this did not reach statistical significance. Delayed graft function was found to be associated with a greater risk of overall pancreas graft failure (P=0.016) and death-censored graft failure (P=0.037).

CONCLUSION

Delayed graft function after pancreas transplantation was found to be associated with a greater risk of overall pancreas graft failure and death-censored graft failure.

Impact of donor-to-recipient weight ratio on survival after bilateral lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between donor-to-recipient weight ratio and post-transplantation survival.

METHODS

From February 1988 to November 2006, 255 adult bilateral lung transplantation patients from 2 different centers were retrospectively analyzed. The cohort was divided into 4 groups depending on the quartile ranges of the donor-to-recipient weight ratio. A time-to-event analysis was performed for risk of death after transplantation conditional on 5-year survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The mean weight ratio for the study cohort was 1.23 ± 0.39. For all lung transplant recipients during the study period, survival rate at 5 years was 58%. Median survival was 6.3 years in the cohort subgroup with weight ratio <1.23, whereas the median survival was 7.7 years for the cohort subgroup with weight ratio >1.23. Weight ratio >1.23 recipients had a significant survival advantage out to 5 years compared with weight ratio <1.23 recipients (66.1% vs 51.1%, P = .0126). With the aim to assess underweight and overweight donors vs recipients, we have divided all patients into 4 groups, from quartile 1 to 4, based on donor-to-recipient weight ratio. Weight ratio strata affected overall survival, with quartile 1 (lower weight ratio recipients) experiencing the lowest 5-year survival (39.1%), followed by quartile 2 (57.8%), quartile 4 (68.2%), and quartile 3 (70.3%) recipients. The effect of weight ratio strata on survival was statistically significant for the quartile 1 recipients (lower quartile) as compared with the 3 other quartiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show a statistically significant effect of donor-to-recipient weight ratios on bilateral lung transplantation survival. A higher donor-to-recipient weight ratio was associated with improved survival after bilateral lung transplantation and likely reflects a mismatch between a relatively overweight donor vs recipient. In contrast, a lower donor-to-recipient ratio was associated with increased mortality after bilateral lung transplantation.

Impact of recipient body mass index on short-term and long-term survival of pancreatic grafts

BACKGROUND

The impact of recipient body mass index on graft and patient survival after pancreas transplantation is not well known.

METHODS

We have analyzed data from all pancreas transplant recipients reported in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1987 and 2011. Recipients were categorized into BMI classes, as defined by the World Health Organization. Short-term (90 days) and long-term (90 days to 5 years) patient and graft survivals were analyzed according to recipient BMI class using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 21,075 adult recipients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 5 ± 1.1 years. Subjects were overweight or obese in 39%. Increasing recipient BMI was an independent predictor of pancreatic graft loss and patient death in the short term (P<0.001), especially for obese class II patient survival (hazard ratio, 2.07; P=0.009). In the long term, obesity, but not overweight, was associated with higher risk of graft failure (P=0.01). Underweight was associated with a higher risk of long-term death (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

These results question the safety of pancreas transplantation in obese patients and suggest that they may be directed to alternate therapies, such as behavioral modifications or bariatric surgery, before pancreas transplantation is considered.

Nutrition in kidney transplantation

Organ transplantation has progressively established itself as the preferred therapy for many end-stage organ failures. However, many of these chronic diseases and their treatments can negatively affect nutritional status, leading to malnutrition and mineral deficiencies.Nutritional status is an important determinant of the clinical outcome of kidney transplant recipients.Malnutrition and obesity may represent a contraindication to transplantation in many cases and may increase the risk of postoperative complications after the transplantation. Nutritional support in kidney transplant recipients is challenging, since it must take into account the pre-transplant nutritional status, the side effects of immunosuppression, the function of the transplanted graft, the presence of infection, and the general status of the patient at the time of the transplantation.With these considerations in mind, we reviewed current literature on the impact of nutritional status on the outcome of kidney transplantation.

Transplant options for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a real epidemic around the world, mainly due to ageing and diabetic nephropathy. Although diabetic nephropathy due to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been studied more extensively, the vast majority of the diabetic CKD patients suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Renal transplantation has been established as a first line treatment for diabetic nephropathy unless there are major contraindications and provides not only a better quality of life, but also a significant survival advantage over dialysis. However, T2DM patients are less likely to be referred for renal transplantation as they are usually older, obese and present significant comorbidities. As pre-emptive renal transplantation presents a clear survival advantage over dialysis, all T2DM patients with CKD should be referred for early evaluation by a transplant center. The transplant center should have enough time in order to examine their eligibility focusing on special issues related with diabetic nephropathy and explore the best options for each patient. Living donor kidney transplantation should always be considered as the first line treatment. Otherwise, the patient should be listed for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Recent progress in transplantation medicine has improved the “transplant menu” for T2DM patients with diabetic nephropathy and there is an ongoing discussion about the place of simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation in well selected patients. The initial hesitations about the different pathophysiology of T2DM have been forgotten due to the almost similar short- and long-term results with T1DM patients. However, there is still a long way and a lot of ethical and logistical issues before establishing SPK transplantation as an ordinary treatment for T2DM patients. In addition recent advances in bariatric surgery may offer new options for severely obese T2DM patients with CKD. Nevertheless, the existing data for T2DM patients with advanced CKD are rather scarce and bariatric surgery should not be considered as a cure for diabetic nephropathy, but only as a bridge for renal transplantation.

Obesity and organ transplantation: successes, failures, and opportunities

The increasing rate of societal obesity is also affecting the transplant world through obesity in candidates and donors as well as its posttransplant repercussions. Being overweight and obese has been shown to have significant effects on both short- and long-term complications as well as patient and graft survival. However, much of the comorbidity can be controlled or prevented with careful patient selection and aggressive management. A team approach to managing obesity and its comorbidities both pre- and posttransplant is essential for successful transplant outcomes. Complicating understanding the results of obesity research is the inclusion different weight categories, use of listing vs transplant weights, patient populations large enough for statistical power, and changes in transplant management, especially immunosuppression protocols, anti-infection protocols, and operative techniques. Much more research is needed regarding many elements, including safe weight loss before transplantation, prevention of weight gain after transplant, genomic influences, and the role of bariatric surgery in the transplant process.

Surgical Morbidity of Simultaneous Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-Centre Experience in the Tacrolimus Era

Introduction. Simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation is performed to restore normoglycaemia and renal function in patients with Type I diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure. We aimed to evaluate the impact of major postoperative complications to patient and graft survival outcomes. Method. Using a prospectively collected database over a 10-year period, major postoperative complications requiring return to operating theatre as well as patient and graft survival outcomes were analysed retrospectively. Results. Between January 2001 and May 2010, 165 patients underwent first-time SPK transplantation. Median age of recipients was 39.8 years (range, 16.9–53.2). Enteric drainage was used in 149 patients, and bladder drainage was used in 16. Median follow-up time was 5.2 years (range 1.1–10.3). Fifty-six patients (34%) returned to operating theatre at least once. Pancreatic allograft loss secondary to vascular thrombosis occurred in 12 patients (7%), and 2 patients (1.2%) required transplant pancreatectomy due to debilitating pancreatic enzyme leaks. At 1 and 5 years, patient survival was 98% and 94%; pancreas graft survival, 86% and 77%; kidney graft survival 96% and 89%, respectively. Conclusion. SPK is a safe and effective treatment for Type I diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure although surgical reintervention is required in approximately one-third of patients. Preventing vascular thrombosis remains a major challenge.

Kidney transplant options for the diabetic patient

For patients with diabetes and progressive chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is the optimal mode of renal replacement therapy, with or without a pancreas transplant. Additional benefits of pancreas transplant have become increasingly apparent due to advances in surgical outcomes and immunosuppression, and may be reasonably considered even in selected patients with type 2 diabetes. In general, pancreas transplantation is associated with long-term survival advantages despite an increased short-term morbidity and mortality risk. This is true with simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation or pancreas after kidney transplantation compared to kidney transplantation alone, regardless of kidney donor status (living or deceased). Individual patient preferences, comorbidities, and expected waiting time influence selection of transplant modality, rather than a clear survival benefit of one strategy versus the other. In selected patients with type 2 diabetes, recent outcomes data support cautious utilization of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation when a living kidney donor transplant is not an option. The purpose of this review is to summarize current data regarding kidney and pancreas transplant treatment options in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes and the influence of current organ allocation policies to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of each of these strategies.

[Is the morbid obesity surgery profitable in times of crisis? A cost-benefit analysis of bariatric surgery]

Morbid obesity is a serious health problem whose prevalence is increasing. Expensive co-morbidities are associated to these patients, as well as a reduction in the survival. Bariatric surgery resolves the co-morbidities (type 2 diabetes mellitus, 86.6%; cardiovascular risk, 79.0%; obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, 83.6%; hypertension, 61.7%), reduces the mortality rate (among 31-40%), and increases the morbid obese patients survival over a 10-years period. It provides significant savings for the National Health System. The obese patients consume a 20% plus of health resources and 68% plus of drugs than general population. Bariatric surgery requires an initial investment (diagnosis-related group cost: 7,468 €), but it is recovered in a cost-effectiveness ratio of 2.5 years. Significant savings are obtained from the third year. To the direct economic benefits associated with reduced health expenditures it should be added an increase in tax collection (sick leave and unemployment reduction is estimated in 18%, with a productivity increase of 57% for self-employed people). Bariatric surgery is one of the most cost-effective procedures in the healthcare system.

Early pancreas allograft thrombosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine factors associated with early pancreatic allograft thrombosis (EPAT). Thrombosis is the leading non-immunological cause of early pancreatic allograft failure. Multiple risk factors have been postulated. We hypothesized that recipient perioperative hypotension was a major risk factor and evaluated the correlation of this and other parameters with EPAT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of the 118 patients who received a pancreatic allograft at our center between October 1992 and January 2010. Multiple donor and recipient parameters were analyzed as associates of EPAT by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 12 episodes of EPAT, resulting in an incidence of 10.2%. On univariate analysis, EPAT was associated with perioperative hypotension, vasopressor use, and neuropathy in the recipient (p ≤ 0.04 for all). On multivariate analysis corrected for age, sex, and peripheral vascular disease, only vasopressor use retained a significant association with EPAT with a hazard ratio of 8.74 (CI 1.11-68.9, p = 0.04). Factors associated with vasopressor use included recipient ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, retinopathy or neuropathy, and any surgical complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant hypotension, measured by the need for perioperative vasopressor use was associated with EPAT, suggesting that maintenance of higher perfusion pressures may avoid this complication.

Evolution of pancreas transplantation: long-term results and perspectives from a high-volume center

OBJECTIVE

To describe the evolution of pancreas transplantation from 1979 to 2011. The aim was to examine factors influencing long-term patient and graft survival, surgical methods, and risk factors influencing organ performance after transplantation.

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation has become the therapy of choice for patients suffering insulin-dependent diabetes and end stage renal failure.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 509 consecutive pancreas transplants (442 simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK], 20 pancreas transplanted alone [PTA], and 47 pancreas transplanted after kidney [PAK]), performed at the University Hospital Innsbruck. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

After overcoming initial immunological and technical problems between 1979 and 1988 (5-year pancreas graft survival rate, 29.7%), pancreas transplantation evolved during the second decade (1989-1996; 5-year pancreas graft survival rate, 42.2%). Technical changes, optimized immunosuppression, careful pretransplant evaluation, and improved graft monitoring have become standard in the last decade and result in excellent 5-year patient (94.3%), kidney (89.4%), and pancreas (81.5%) graft survival. Five-year graft survival was superior in SPK (68.8%) compared with PAK (62.5%) and PTA (16.4%). SPK retransplantation can be carried out safely with 5-year patient (87.5%) and pancreas graft (75.0%) survival. Overall 5-year patient survival after loss of the first pancreas graft is significantly better in patients who underwent retransplantation (89.4% vs. 67.9%, P = 0.001). Long-term pancreas graft survival is independent of donor body mass index, sex, and cause of death, anastomosis time and the number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, recipient age, body mass index, sex, current panel reactive antibodies, and waiting time. Significant risk factors for reduced graft survival are cold ischemia time and donor age.

CONCLUSIONS

During the last 32 years, many problems in pancreas transplantation have been overcome and it may currently represent the therapeutic gold standard for some patients with diabetes and end stage renal failure.

Transplantation in obese patient

Obesity is a worldwide epidemic leading to severe comorbidity that damages end-organ function. Overall transplant outcomes in this population are inferior to those in nonobese patients. Large population studies show decreased patient and graft survival in obese kidney transplant patients. Despite the poorer outcomes, kidney transplantation is considered because of the survival benefit as compared with the wait-listed dialysis patients. In liver transplantation, the benefit to transplantation as compared with remaining on the list is obvious, as there is no viable liver dialysis at this time. Obesity in potential organ donors impacts both medical and surgical issues. Obesity-related kidney disease affects both the remaining and transplanted kidney. Pancreas donor organs are associated with decreased early graft survival. Liver donor organs with significant steatosis lead to an increased risk for delayed or nonfunction of the organ. Immunosuppressive drugs with variable lipophilicity and altered volume of distribution can greatly affect the therapeutic usefulness of these drugs. Transplant candidates benefit from a multidisciplinary team approach to their care. As the epidemic progresses and less-invasive treatments for metabolic surgery evolve, we are likely to require more patients to lose weight prior to transplantation as we continue to strive for improved outcomes.

Outcomes of preemptive kidney with or without subsequent pancreas transplant compared with preemptive simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have indicated that type 1 diabetic (T1DM) recipients of a simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant have greater short-term mortality compared with living donor kidney (LDK) transplantation. Whether this association remains and how outcomes compare to deceased donor kidney (DDK) transplantation in the preemptive setting are unknown.

METHODS

Using data on recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2010 from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network of Organ Sharing, patient and graft survival (calculated from the time of kidney transplant) of pancreas after preemptive LDK (PALK, n=389), preemptive LDK not receiving a pancreas transplant (LDK/noP, n=289), preemptive DDK (n=112), and preemptive SPK transplantations (n=1402) were compared.

RESULTS

At 6 years, patient survival was excellent (PALK=89.4%, LDK/noP=84.9%, DDK=81.2%, and SPK=91.1%) and not different between PALK, LDK/noP, and SPK (P value vs. PALK: LDK/noP=0.08; SPK=0.85) but was lower with preemptive DDK versus preemptive PALK (P=0.03). When both LDK groups were considered together, there was higher mortality in the first 180 days after transplant with preemptive DDK (3.7% vs. 1.1%; P=0.03) and similar mortality with preemptive SPK (2.3%; P=0.07). After multivariate adjustment, there was a trend toward increased risk of death with preemptive DDK compared with preemptive PALK (hazard ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-3.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient survival associated with preemptive transplantation among T1DM recipients was excellent at 6 years, with the greatest survival favoring PALK, LDK/noP, and SPK rather than DDK. In contrast with prior studies reporting greater short-term mortality with SPK among the general T1DM population, short-term mortality after preemptive transplant is similar between LDK and SPK.