Pancreas After Living Donor Kidney Versus Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant: An Analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing Database

Joint modelling for organ transplantation outcomes for patients with diabetes and the end-stage renal disease

This article is motivated by jointly modelling longitudinal and time-to-event clinical data of patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. All patients are on the waiting list for the pancreas transplant after kidney transplant, and some of them have a pancreas transplant before kidney transplant failure or death. Scant literature has studied the dynamical joint relationship of the estimated glomerular filtration rates trajectory, the effect of pancreas transplant, and time-to-event outcomes, although it remains an important clinical question. In an attempt to describe the association in the multiple outcomes, we propose a new joint model with a longitudinal submodel and an accelerated failure time submodel, which are linked by some latent variables. The accelerated failure time submodel is used to determine the relationship of the time-to-event outcome with all predictors. In addition, the piecewise linear function in the survival submodel is used to calculate the dynamic hazard ratio curve of a time-dependent side event, because the effect of the side event on the time-to-event outcome is non-proportional. The model parameters are estimated with a Monte Carlo EM algorithm. The finite sample performance of the proposed method is investigated in simulation studies. Our method is demonstrated by fitting the joint model for the clinical data of 13,635 patients with diabetes and the end-stage renal disease.

An analysis of the survival outcomes of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation compared to live donor kidney transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes: a UK Transplant Registry study

Transplant options for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) include deceased donor kidney, live donor kidney (LDK) and simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between LDK and SPK for patients with type 1 diabetes and ESRD in the UK. Data on all SPK (n = 1739) and LDK (n = 385) transplants performed between January 2001 and December 2014 were obtained from the UK Transplant Registry. Unadjusted patient and kidney graft survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis of kidney graft and patient survival was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. There was no significant difference in patient (P = 0.435) or kidney graft survival (P = 0.204) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis there was no association between LDK/SPK and patient survival [HR 0.71 (0.47-1.06), P = 0.095]. However, LDK was associated with an overall lower risk for kidney graft failure [HR 0.60 (0.38-0.94), P = 0.025]. SPK recipients with a functioning pancreas graft had significantly better kidney graft and patient survival than LDK recipients or those with a failed pancreas graft. SPK transplantation does not confer an overall survival advantage compared to LDK. However, those SPK recipients with a functioning pancreas have significantly better outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney and Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation in Recipients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Silesian Experience

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KTx) markedly reduces mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) caused by type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The outstanding issue is whether transplantation should be limited only to KTx, with further insulinotherapy, or combined with pancreas transplantation in patients with ESKD/T1DM. The goal of this study was to compare the results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKTx) and deceased donor KTx and to identify factors affecting patient and kidney graft survival in patients with ESKD/T1DM.

METHODS

Eighty-seven deceased donor KTx and 66 SPKTx operated on in the Silesia region of Poland between 1998 and 2013 were included in the retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

During the mean 6.7 ± 3.6 years of follow-up, fewer cardiovascular episodes were observed in SPKTx recipients than in KTx recipients (1.5% vs 12.6%; P < .05). Five-year patient survival (80.7% in SPKTx vs 77.5% in KTx) and kidney graft survival (66.1% in SPKTx vs 70.4% in KTx) did not differ between study groups. There were no differences in patient survival (log-rank test, P = .99) or kidney graft survival (P = .99) based on Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis failed to identify factors explaining patient and kidney graft survival. Five-year pancreas graft survival was 58.9%. SPKTx recipients had significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rates during the 7-year posttransplant period and less frequently developed proteinuria (6.1% vs 23%; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation reduced cardiovascular risk and prevented the development of proteinuria but did not improve patient and kidney graft survival in recipients with T1DM in the 7-year follow-up period.

Kidney Transplantation in the Diabetic Patient

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most important causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease, kidney transplantation (KT) with or without a pancreas transplant is the treatment of choice. We aimed to review current data regarding kidney and pancreas transplant options in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes and the outcomes of different treatment modalities. In general, pancreas transplantation is associated with long-term survival advantages despite an increased short-term morbidity and mortality risk. This applies to simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation or pancreas after KT compared to KT alone (either living donor or deceased). Other factors as living donor availability, comorbidities, and expected waiting time have to be considered whens electing one transplant modality, rather than a clear benefit in survival of one strategy vs. others. In selected type 2 diabetic patients, data support cautious utilization of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation when a living kidney donor is not an option. Pancreas and kidney transplantation seems to be the treatment of choice for most type 1 diabetic and selected type 2 diabetic patients.

Conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept to prevent the progression of chronic kidney disease in pancreas transplantation: case report of two patients

Belatacept is a novel immunosuppressive agent that may be used as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in immunosuppression (IS) regimens. We report two cases of pancreas transplant that were switched from tacrolimus (TAC) to belatacept. Case 1: 38-year-old female with pancreas transplant alone maintained on TAC-based IS regimen whose serum creatinine (SCr) slowly deteriorated from 0.6 mg/dL at baseline to 2.2 mg/dL, 16 months posttransplant. A native kidney biopsy performed showed CNI toxicity. The patient was started on belatacept and TAC was eliminated. Case 2: 49-year-old female with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant, maintained on TAC-based regimen where the SCr worsened over an initial 3-month period from a baseline of 1.0 to 3.0 mg/dL. Belatacept was started and TAC was lowered. Due to persistent graft dysfunction and kidney transplant biopsy still showing changes consistent with CNI toxicity, the TAC was then discontinued. At >1 year postbelatacept and off TAC follow-up, kidney function as measured by SCr remains stable at 1.0±0.2 mg/dL in both recipients. Neither patient developed rejection following the switch, and pancreas allograft function remains stable in both recipients.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for pancreas and pancreas with kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Pancreas or kidney-pancreas transplantation improves survival and quality of life for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and kidney failure. Immunosuppression after transplantation is associated with complications. Steroids have adverse effects on cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, hyperglycaemia or hyperlipidaemia, increase risk of infection, obesity, cataracts, myopathy, bone metabolism alterations, dermatologic problems and cushingoid appearance. Whether avoiding steroids changes outcomes is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of steroid early withdrawal (treatment for less than 14 days after transplantation), late withdrawal (after 14 days after transplantation) or steroid avoidance in patients receiving a pancreas (including a vascularized organ) alone (PTA), simultaneous with a kidney (SPK) or after kidney transplantation (PAK).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (to 18 June 2014) through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator. We handsearched: reference lists of nephrology textbooks, relevant studies, recent publications and clinical practice guidelines; abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings; and sent emails and letters seeking information about unpublished or incomplete studies to known investigators.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of steroid avoidance (including early withdrawal) versus steroid maintenance or versus late withdrawal in pancreas or pancreas with kidney transplant recipients. We defined steroid avoidance as complete avoidance of steroid immunosuppression, early steroid withdrawal as steroid treatment for less than 14 days after transplantation and late withdrawal as steroid withdrawal after 14 days after transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the retrieved titles and abstracts, and where necessary the full text reports to determine which studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Authors of included studies were contacted to obtain missing information. Statistical analyses were performed using random effects models and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Cohort studies were not meta-analysed, but their findings summarised descriptively.

MAIN RESULTS

Three RCTs enrolling 144 participants met our inclusion criteria. Two compared steroid avoidance versus late steroid withdrawal and one compared late steroid withdrawal versus steroid maintenance. All studies included SPK and only one also included PTA. All studies had an overall moderate risk of bias and presented only short-term results (six to 12 months). Two studies (89 participants) compared steroid avoidance or early steroid withdrawal versus late steroid withdrawal. There was no clear evidence of an impact on mortality (2 studies, 89 participants: RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.21 to 12.75), risk of kidney loss censored for death (2 studies, 89 participants: RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.09), risk of pancreas loss censored for death (2 studies, 89 participants: RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.04), or acute kidney rejection (1 study, 49 participants: RR 2.08, 95% CI 0.20 to 21.50), however results were uncertain and consistent with no difference or important benefit or harm of steroid avoidance/early steroid withdrawal. The study that compared late steroid withdrawal versus steroid maintenance observed no deaths, no graft loss or acute kidney rejection at six months in either group and reported uncertain effects on acute pancreas rejection (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.35). Of the possible adverse effects only infection was reported by one study. There were significantly more UTIs reported in the late withdrawal group compared to the steroid avoidance group (1 study, 25 patients: RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.66).We also identified 13 cohort studies and one RCT which randomised tacrolimus versus cyclosporin. These studies in general showed that steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies had benefits in lowering HbAc1 and risk of infections (BK virus and CMV disease) and improved blood pressure control without increasing the risk of rejection. However, two studies found an increased incidence of acute pancreas rejection (HR 2.8, 95% CI 0.89 to 8.81, P = 0.066 in one study and 43.3% in the steroid withdrawal group versus 9.3% in the steroid maintenance, P < 0.05 at three years in the other) and one study found an increased incidence of acute kidney rejection (18.7% in the steroid withdrawal group versus 2.8% in the steroid maintenance, P < 0.05) at three years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence for the benefits and harms of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplantation in the three RCTs (144 patients) identified. The results showed uncertain results for short-term risk of rejection, mortality, or graft survival in steroid-sparing strategies in a very small number of patients over a short period of follow-up. Overall the data was sparse, so no firm conclusions are possible. Moreover, the 13 observational studies findings generally concur with the evidence found in the RCTs.

Kidney transplant options for the diabetic patient

For patients with diabetes and progressive chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is the optimal mode of renal replacement therapy, with or without a pancreas transplant. Additional benefits of pancreas transplant have become increasingly apparent due to advances in surgical outcomes and immunosuppression, and may be reasonably considered even in selected patients with type 2 diabetes. In general, pancreas transplantation is associated with long-term survival advantages despite an increased short-term morbidity and mortality risk. This is true with simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation or pancreas after kidney transplantation compared to kidney transplantation alone, regardless of kidney donor status (living or deceased). Individual patient preferences, comorbidities, and expected waiting time influence selection of transplant modality, rather than a clear survival benefit of one strategy versus the other. In selected patients with type 2 diabetes, recent outcomes data support cautious utilization of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation when a living kidney donor transplant is not an option. The purpose of this review is to summarize current data regarding kidney and pancreas transplant treatment options in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes and the influence of current organ allocation policies to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of each of these strategies.

Follow-up of secondary diabetic complications after pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Successful pancreas transplantation restores physiologic glycemic and metabolic control. Its effects on overall patient survival (especially for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation) are clear-cut. We herein review the available literature to define the impact of pancreas transplantation on chronic complications of diabetes mellitus.

RECENT FINDINGS

With longer-term follow-up, wider patient populations, and more accurate investigational tools (clinical and functional tests, noninvasive imaging, histology, and molecular biology), growing data show that successful pancreas transplantation may slow the progression, stabilize, and even favor the regression of secondary complications of diabetes, both microvascular and macrovascular, in a relevant proportion of recipients.

SUMMARY

Patients who are referred for pancreas transplantation usually suffer from advanced chronic complications of diabetes, which have classically been deemed irreversible. A successful pancreas transplantation is often able to slow the progression, stabilize, and even reverse many microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Growing clinical evidence shows that the expected natural history of long-term diabetic complications can be significantly modified by successful pancreas transplantation.

Does simultaneously transplanted pancreas improve long-term outcome of kidney transplantation in type 1 diabetic recipients?

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is an alternative to kidney transplantation (KTx) for type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, a fair comparison of SPK and KTx is difficult because of significant differences in donor, recipient, and transplantation procedure parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the early and long-term outcomes of SPK versus KTx in southwest Poland.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-five diabetic dialysis patients who had SPK and 64 patients who had KTx were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

SPK recipients were younger (38±6 years versus 42±9 years) and received organs from younger donors (25±7 versus 43±12 years) compared to the KTx group. They had shorter kidney cold ischemia time (9±2 hours versus 22±7 hours) but worse HLA class II mismatches (1.4±0.6 versus 1.0±0.5). In the early postoperative period, three patients died from the SPK group and one patient died from the KTx group. Additionally, two SPK patients lost their pancreatic grafts, and five KTx patients lost their kidney grafts. One-year patient survival rates for the SPK and KTx groups were 88% and 98%, respectively, and 5-year, 81% and 93%, respectively. One-year kidney graft survivals rates for the SPK and KTx groups were 100% and 89%, respectively, and 5-years, 89% and 81%, respectively. One-year insulin-free survival among SPK patients was 90% and the 5-year survival rate was 76%. Excretory function of the transplanted kidneys was better among SPK group; however, the difference reached statistical significance only in posttransplant years 2 and 3: 63.5±20.1 versus 50.3±19.7 and 64.9±12.9 versus 51.6±21.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for SPK and KTx, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Normoglycemia in SPK recipients did not improve patient survival at 5 years. The worse HLA compatibility in the SPK group did not lead to impaired kidney graft survival compared to KTx. Better kidney graft function among SPK recipients probably resulted from a more restrictive donor selection.

Outcome of surgical complications following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation carries a higher risk of surgical complications than kidney transplantation alone. We aimed to establish the incidence of surgical complications after SPK transplantation and determine the effect on graft and patient survival.

METHODS

Outcomes of all SPK transplants performed at our centre were compared between patients who experienced a surgical complication (SC group) and those who did not (NSC group).

RESULTS

Our centre performed 193 SPK transplants in a 15-year period; 44 patients (23%) experienced a surgical complication. One-year and 5-year pancreatic graft survival was 89 and 80%, respectively; this was lower in the SC group. There was no significant difference in patient or kidney graft survival between the SC and NSC groups at 5 years (92 and 83%, respectively.)

CONCLUSION

Surgical complications following SPK transplantation can cause significant morbidity and adversely affect pancreas graft survival, but do not affect long-term kidney or patient survival.

The impact of pancreas transplantation on kidney allograft survival

Whether pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) compromises kidney allograft survival, and what pre-PAK glomerular filtration rate (GFR) should be used to select patients for PAK is unclear. We analyzed all (n = 2776) PAK recipients in the United States between 1989 and 2007 and compared their risk of kidney failure to a comparator group of n = 13 635 young adult diabetic kidney only transplant recipients during the same time after accounting for selection bias by the use of a propensity score for PAK in a multivariate time to event analysis. In a secondary analysis, we determined the association of pre-PAK GFR with subsequent kidney allograft survival. Despite an increased risk of death early after pancreas transplantation, PAK recipients had a decreased long-term risk of kidney allograft failure compared to diabetic kidney only transplant recipients HR = 0.89; 95% CI: [0.78-1.00]; p = 0.05. An association of pre-PAK GFR with kidney survival was not evident until 3 years after pancreas transplantation, and patients with a pre-PAK GFR of 30-39 mL/min still attained 10-year post-PAK kidney survival of 69%. We conclude that PAK is associated with improved kidney allograft survival, and pre-PAK GFR 30-39 mL/min should not preclude PAK. Expanded use of PAK is warranted.

Pancreatic transplantation

A pancreas transplant is a surgical procedure to place a healthy pancreas from a donor into a patient whose pancreas no longer functions properly. Exocrine pancreas transplantation remains the standard treatment of choice for patients with diabetes mellitus complicated by end-stage renal disease. The use of pancreas transplantation for type 2 diabetes mellitus is an emerging concept. A pancreas transplant is often done in conjunction with a kidney transplant. Even if pancreas transplantation provides the best glycemic control option for diabetes mellitus, it is associated with significant morbidities related to infectious disease. The present article provides with a review of pancreatic transplantation.