Liver transplant outcomes for patients with hepatorenal syndrome treated with pretransplant vasoconstrictors and albumin. Transplantation. 2011;91:1141-1147. [PMID: 21544034 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31821690bf]

Post Liver Transplant Renal Dysfunction-Evaluation, Management and Immunosuppressive Practice

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective and lifesaving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Significant improvement in intermediate and long-term survival has been possible due to advancements in immunosuppressive therapy, perioperative care, and surgical techniques. Despite these advances, metabolic complications, including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, and renal dysfunction, are challenging issues after LT. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) after LT are common and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of kidney injury after LT is challenging, and no technique has yet proven effective in prediction of renal dysfunction. The methods for assessing renal function range from formulas that predict glomerular filtration rate to non-invasive biomarkers. The universal adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease has a direct impact on the incidence of peri-transplant AKI and development of CKD in the long-term. Post-LT renal dysfunction is multifactorial and is usually a result of pre-transplantation comorbidities, occurrence of renal dysfunction on the waiting list, perioperative events, and post-transplant nephrotoxic immunosuppressive medication use. Early identification of patients at risk for renal dysfunction and adoption of preventive measures are crucial in the pre-transplant period. No data are currently available to suggest a surgical technique that reliably demonstrates renal protection. Nephroprotective strategies during LT follow accepted surgical practice guidelines, such as maintenance of intravascular volume and mean arterial pressure. The management of kidney disease following LT is challenging, as by the time the serum creatinine is significantly elevated, few interventions impact the course of progression. Early nephroprotective measures are strongly advised and they mostly center on delaying the administration of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) during the initial postoperative period, lowering CNI dosage and combining CNI with mycophenolate mofetil and everolimus. The reasons for renal failure following LT, the techniques used to diagnose it, and the therapies designed to preserve renal function both immediately and late after LT are all critically evaluated in this review.

Outcomes of patients with hepatorenal syndrome undergoing liver transplantation in the era of terlipressin

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of terlipressin in improving pre-liver transplant renal function in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) has been well documented, however, its impact on post-transplant renal function remains poorly described. This study aims to describe the impact of HRS and terlipressin on post-liver transplant renal function and survival.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective, observational study was conducted to identify post-transplant outcomes of patients diagnosed with HRS undergoing liver transplant (HRS cohort) and those undergoing transplant for non-HRS, non-hepatocellular carcinoma cirrhotic indications (comparator cohort) between January 1997 and March 2020. The primary outcome was serum creatinine at 180 days post-liver transplant. Other renal outcomes and overall survival were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

109 patients with HRS and 502 comparator patients underwent liver transplant. The comparator cohort was younger than the HRS cohort (53 vs. 57 years, P < 0.001). The median creatinine at day 180 post-transplant was higher in the HRS transplant group (119 µmol/L vs. 103 µmol/L, P < 0.001), however, this association lost significance following multivariate analysis. Seven patients (7%) in the HRS cohort received a combined liver-kidney transplant. There was no significant difference in the 12-month post-transplant survival between the two groups (94% vs. 94%, P = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HRS treated with terlipressin who subsequently undergo liver transplantation have post-transplant renal and survival outcomes comparable to patients transplanted for cirrhosis without HRS. This study supports the practice of liver-only transplant in this cohort and the reservation of renal allografts for those who have primary renal disease.

Treatment and outcome of hepatorenal syndrome in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database

BACKGROUND

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a life-threatening complication of end-stage liver disease. This study aimed to clarify the status of HRS in Japan by analyzing the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized for cirrhosis and HRS from July 2010 to March 2019 were sampled. They were divided into two groups according to their prognosis upon discharge: the transplant-free survival group and the death or liver transplantation group. The two groups' baseline patient characteristics and treatments were compared.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 1,412 participants was 67.3 years (standard deviation: 12.3 years), and 65.4% were male. The Child-Pugh grades was B and C in 18.8% and 81.2%, respectively. Hepatocellular carcinoma was present in 27.1% of the patients, and the proportion of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was 2.3%. Albumin, noradrenaline, and dopamine were administered to 57.9%, 8.0%, and 14.9% of the patients, respectively; 7.0% of the patients underwent renal replacement therapy; and 5.0% were admitted to the intensive care unit. Intravenous antibiotics were administered to 30.8% of the patients. A total of 925 patients (65.5%) died or underwent liver transplantation. In addition to a higher proportion of patients with poor baseline liver function, the death or liver transplantation group included more males, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and those with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

HRS in Japan has a high mortality rate. Albumin was administered to over 50% of participants. Although noradrenaline is recommended in Japanese clinical guidelines, dopamine was more frequently used as a vasoconstrictor in clinical practice.

Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome - chronic kidney disease: Impact on renal function

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) ameliorates renal function in type-2 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Available evidence is based on 'old' HRS diagnostic criteria, and not on the current definition of HRS - chronic kidney disease (HRS-CKD). Among patients who underwent TIPS for refractory ascites over the last 12 years, we investigated clinical and renal function evolution of those with HRS-CKD.

METHODS

among 212 patients, 41 with HRS-CKD were included. Renal function was evaluated for 12 months after TIPS, along with management of ascites and transplant-free survival (TFS).

RESULTS

renal function significantly improved already one week after TIPS [serum creatinine (sCr): 1.37 ± 0.23 vs 1.94 ± 0.54 mg/dl, p< 0.001]; the amelioration was maintained during the whole follow-up and was observed in every CKD stage, defined according to baseline estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). sCr and eGFR became comparable between different CKD stages after only one week, whilst significantly different at baseline. TIPS led to a remarkable improvement in the control of ascites in all CKD stages and no significant differences in TFS were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS led to an early, substantial and persistent improvement in renal function in patients with HRS-CKD, irrespective of their baseline CKD stage.

Hepatorenal syndrome: pathophysiology and evidence-based management update

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a functional renal failure that develops in patients with advanced hepatic cirrhosis with ascites and in those with fulminant hepatic failure. The prevalence of HRS varies among studies but in general it is the third most common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhotic patients after pre-renal azotemia and acute tubular necrosis. HRS carries a grim prognosis with a mortality rate approaching 90% three months after disease diagnosis. Fortunately, different strategies have been proven to be successful in preventing HRS. Although treatment options are available, they are not universally effective in restoring renal function but they might prolong survival long enough for liver transplantation, which is the ultimate treatment. Much has been learned in the last two decades regarding the pathophysiology and management of this disease which lead to notable evolution in the HRS definition and better understanding on how best to manage HRS patients. In the current review, we will summarize the recent advancement in epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of HRS.

Response to Terlipressin and Albumin Is Associated With Improved Liver Transplant Outcomes in Patients With Hepatorenal Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although terlipressin and albumin are effective at treating acute kidney injury-hepatorenal syndrome (AKI-HRS), liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment. However, it is unclear if an effective treatment with terlipressin and albumin improves post-LT outcomes in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of response to treatment with terlipressin and albumin on posttransplant outcomes in patients with AKI-HRS.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We analyzed two cohorts of patients with cirrhosis listed for LT between 2012 and 2016: 82 patients who developed AKI-HRS before LT and were treated with terlipressin and albumin and 259 patients without AKI-HRS who received transplants during the study period (control group). After LT, patients were followed up until discharge, every month for the first 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter. Of the patients, 43 (52%) responded to terlipressin and albumin. Responders had a better 30-day transplant-free survival (60% vs. 33%, P = 0.006), longer LT waiting list time (37 vs. 17 days, P = 0.041), and lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at the time of LT (23 vs. 29, P = 0.007). Among patients with AKI-HRS receiving transplant, nonresponders required renal replacement therapy (RRT) more frequently than responders (20% vs. 0%, P = 0.024). Nonresponders had a significantly higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) at 1 year after LT than responders (65% vs. 31%, P = 0.019). In multivariate analysis, nonresponse to terlipressin and albumin was found to be an independent predictor for CKD at 1 year after LT (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 2.76, P = 0.001), whereas responders did not have an increased risk (SHR = 1.53, P = 0.210).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AKI-HRS, response to terlipressin and albumin reduces the need for RRT after LT and reduces the risk of CKD at 1 year after LT.

Reduction in acute kidney injury stage predicts survival in patients with type-1 hepatorenal syndrome

Background

Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1), a form of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis, has a median survival of days to weeks if untreated. The impact of reduction in AKI stage on overall survival in cirrhosis, independent of HRS reversal, is unclear.

Methods

The Randomized, placEbo-controlled, double-blind study to confirm the reVERSal of HRS-1 with terlipressin study assessed terlipressin versus placebo, both with albumin, as treatment for HRS-1 for ≤14 days. Renal dysfunction severity was categorized by AKI stage at enrollment. Baseline patient characteristics were evaluated as predictors of AKI improvement using a multivariate model; the association between AKI stage reduction and 90-day survival was assessed using linear regression.

Results

A total of 184 patients (terlipressin: n = 91; placebo: n = 93) with similar numbers in AKI Stages 1–3 (terlipressin/placebo, Stage 1: n = 25/26; Stage 2: n = 35/33; Stage 3: n = 31/34) were included. Predictors of AKI improvement were absence of alcoholic hepatitis, baseline serum creatinine and male gender. Overall survival was not significantly different across AKI stages (range 53–65%). In patients with no AKI worsening, 90-day survival was consistently better when AKI improved independent of HRS reversal, regardless of the initial AKI stage, with patients with Stage 1 at initial diagnosis achieving the greatest clinical benefit. A significant association was observed between AKI reduction and overall 90-day survival (P = 0.0022).

Conclusions

A reduction in AKI stage, independent of HRS reversal, was sufficient to improve overall survival in patients with HRS-1. The goal for HRS-1 treatment should be less stringent than absolute HRS reversal.

Need for Pretransplant Midodrine Does Not Negatively Impact Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplant Outcomes

Background.

Midodrine is often needed pretransplant to improve hemodynamics in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant candidates. Previous research has shown that patients requiring midodrine before kidney transplant alone have increased posttransplant risk for delayed allograft function, graft failure, and death. However, the impact of pretransplant midodrine use on outcomes after simultaneous liver-kidney transplant is unknown.

Methods.

We performed a retrospective study of all adult (age ≥18 y) simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients from a single academic transplant center from February 1, 2002, to June 30, 2019.

Results.

Sixty-four simultaneous liver-kidney transplants were performed in our institution during this time period, of which, 43 were not on midodrine before transplant, 17 were on midodrine alone, and 4 were on intravenous (IV) vasopressor therapy. Despite the midodrine group having a higher MELD-Na at listing, higher MELD-Na at transplant, and being older, there were no significant differences in key outcomes including delayed renal allograft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate at transplant discharge, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 y after transplant compared with the nonmidodrine group. There was no significant difference in graft failure or survival at last follow-up.

Conclusions.

Our study suggests that need for pretransplant midodrine should not be a barrier to simultaneous liver-kidney transplant.

Intensive Care Unit Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Patients Undergoing Orthotopic Liver Transplants Recipients: A Prospective, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant recipients continue to have high perioperative resource utilization and prolonged length of stay despite improvements in perioperative care. Enhanced recovery pathways have been shown in other surgical populations to produce reductions in hospital resource utilization.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was performed to examine the effect of an enhanced recovery pathway for postoperative care after liver transplantation. Outcomes from patients undergoing liver transplantation from November 1, 2013, to October 31, 2014, managed by the pathway were compared to transplant recipients from the year before pathway implementation. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess the association of the clinical pathway on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The intervention and control groups included 141 and 106 patients, respectively. There were no demographic differences between the control and intervention group including no differences between the length of surgery and cold ischemic time. Median intensive care unit length of stay was reduced from 4.4 to 2.6 days (P < .001). The intervention group had a higher likelihood of earlier discharge (hazard ratio [95% CI], 2.01 [1.55-2.62]; P < .001), and a 69% and 65% lower odds of receiving a plasma (P < .001) or packed red blood cell (P < .001) transfusion. There was no significant effect on hospital mortality (P = .40), intensive care unit readmission rates (P = .75), or postoperative infections (urinary traction infections: P = .09; pneumonia: P = .27).

CONCLUSIONS

An enhanced recovery pathway focused on milestone-based elements of intensive care unit management and predetermined management triggers including hemodynamic goals, fluid therapy, perioperative antibiotics, glycemic control, and standardized transfusion triggers led to reductions in intensive care unit length of stay without an increase in perioperative complications.

Clinical Outcomes after Liver Transplantation for Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) decreases survival of cirrhotic patients. The outcomes of HRS after liver transplantation (LT) were inconsistently reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis study to estimate the post-LT rates of death and HRS reversal.

METHODS

A thorough search of literatures was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and conference abstracts for reports on post-LT survival and HRS reversal. Data for the posttransplant rates of HRS reversal, death, and acute rejection were extracted. The rates were pooled using inverse variance method if there was no heterogeneity between studies. Otherwise, the random effect model was applied.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. Pooling HRS reversal rates indicated high heterogeneity with a pooled rate of 0.834 (95% CI: 0.709-0.933). The pooled overall death rates for HRS and non-HRS after LT were 0.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.33) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14-0.26). The risk ratio of death between HRS and non-HRS patients was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.14-1.47, P < 0.001). The probability of death at 1, 3, and 5 years tended to be higher among HRS.

CONCLUSIONS

HRS is reversible in about 83% of patients after LT. However, the posttransplant mortality rate of HRS patients is still increased.

Influence of hepatorenal syndrome on outcome of living donor liver transplantation: A single-center experience in 357 patients

AIM

Liver transplantation is the only curative treatment for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS); however, the influence of HRS on the patient and renal outcome after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of HRS on the outcome of LDLT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 357 consecutive adult patients who underwent primary LDLT between January 2005 and March 2013 at Kyoto University Hospital. The outcome of the patients with HRS was compared with those without HRS.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients (8%) were diagnosed as HRS (Group-HRS) preoperatively, and the other 328 patients (92%) were not diagnosed as HRS (Group-Non-HRS). Group-HRS showed a significantly lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (22.1 vs 78.3 mL/min/1.73m² , P < 0.001) and higher Child-Pugh-Turcotte score (13 vs 10, P < 0.001) than Group-non-HRS. After a median follow up of 60 months, the 1-, 3- and 5-year recipients' survival were 60.7%, 57.1% and 57.1% in Group-HRS, and 83.7%, 79.4% and 76.2% in Group-Non-HRS, respectively (P = 0.030). Concomitant HRS significantly elongated postoperative hospital stays (75 vs 50 days, P = 0.003), as well as predisposed patients to higher in-hospital mortality (41% vs 18%, P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate on admission <40 mL/min/1.73m² , OR 2.106, P = 0.03) was an independent risk factor for 1-year recipients' survival after LDLT, in addition to donor age ≥38 years (OR 3.114, P < 0.001), Child-Pugh-Turcotte score ≥13 (OR 2.929, P < 0.001) and left lobe graft (OR 2.225, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Coincidence of HRS is associated with significantly worse outcome after LDLT, especially in the early post-transplant period.

Protecting the Kidney in Liver Transplant Candidates: Practice-Based Recommendations From the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are common in patients awaiting liver transplantation, and both have a marked impact on the perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality of liver transplant recipients. Consequently, we reviewed the epidemiology of AKI and CKD in patients with end-stage liver disease, highlighted strategies to prevent and manage AKI, evaluated the changing liver transplant waiting list's impact on kidney function, delineated important considerations in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant selection, and projected possible future transplant policy changes and outcomes. This review was assembled by experts in the field and endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestinal Community of Practice and Board of Directors and provides practice-based recommendations for preservation of kidney function in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) plays an important role in patients with liver cirrhosis on the wait list for liver transplantation (LT). The 1 and 5-year probability of developing HRS in cirrhotic with ascites is 20% and 40%, respectively. In this article, we reviewed current concepts in HRS pathophysiology, guidelines for HRS diagnosis, effective treatment options presently available, and controversies surrounding liver alone vs simultaneous liver kidney transplant (SLKT) in transplant candidates. Many treatment options including albumin, vasoconstrictors, renal replacement therapy, and eventual LT have remained a mainstay in the treatment of HRS. Unfortunately, even after aggressive measures such as terlipressin use, the rate of recovery is less than 50% of patients. Moreover, current SLKT guidelines include: (1) estimation of glomerular filtration rate of 30 mL/min or less for 4-8 wk; (2) proteinuria > 2 g/d; or (3) biopsy proven interstitial fibrosis or glomerulosclerosis. Even with these updated criteria there is a lack of consistency regarding long-term benefits for SLKT vs LT alone. Finally, in regards to kidney dysfunction in the post-transplant setting, an estimation of glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m² may be associated with an increased risk of patients having long-term end stage renal disease. HRS is common in patients with cirrhosis and those on liver transplant waitlist. Prompt identification and therapy initiation in transplant candidates with HRS may improve post-transplantation outcomes. Future studies identifying optimal vasoconstrictor regimens, alternative therapies, and factors predictive of response to therapy are needed. The appropriate use of SLKT in patients with HRS remains controversial and requires further evidence by the transplant community.

Terlipressin plus albumin versus midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized trial

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a serious complication of cirrhosis, is associated with high mortality without treatment. Terlipressin with albumin is effective in the reversal of HRS. Where terlipressin is not available, as in the United States, midodrine and octreotide with albumin are used as an alternative treatment of HRS. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of terlipressin plus albumin versus midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in the treatment of HRS in a randomized controlled trial. Twenty-seven patients were randomized to receive terlipressin with albumin (TERLI group) and 22 to receive midodrine and octreotide plus albumin (MID/OCT group). The TERLI group received terlipressin by intravenous infusion, initially 3 mg/24 hours, progressively increased to 12 mg/24 hours if there was no response. The MID/OCT group received midodrine orally at an initial dose of 7.5 mg thrice daily, with the dose increased to a maximum of 12.5 mg thrice daily, together with octreotide subcutaneously: initial dose 100 μg thrice daily and up to 200 μg thrice daily. Both groups received albumin intravenously 1 g/kg of body weight on day 1 and 20-40 g/day thereafter. There was a significantly higher rate of recovery of renal function in the TERLI group (19/27, 70.4%) compared to the MID/OCT group (6/21, 28.6%), P = 0.01. Improvement in renal function and lower baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score were associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

Terlipressin plus albumin is significantly more effective than midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in improving renal function in patients with HRS.

Treatment to improve acute kidney injury in cirrhosis

OPINION STATEMENT

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an ominous complication of decompensated cirrhosis, which can be fatal if not treated promptly. It is important that clinicians recognize that AKI has occurred and institute timely treatment. Recent establishment of diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines are most useful, and these will be further refined as treatments are being modified to improve patient outcome. To manage such a patient, firstly, the cause of the AKI needs to be identified and any precipitating factors corrected. Bacterial infections are a common cause of AKI in cirrhosis, and it is recommended to offer empirical antibiotics in cases of suspicious bacterial infection until all the cultures are negative. Patients should be given albumin infusion in doses of 1 g/kg of body weight for at least 2 days. This can improve the filling of the central circulation, and also absorb many of the bacterial products or inflammatory cytokines that play a role in mediating the renal dysfunction. Often, albumin infusion alone may be sufficient to reverse the AKI. For patients who have acute or type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS1), which is a special form of AKI, pharmacotherapy in the form of vasoconstrictor will be needed. The vasoconstrictor can be terlipressin, norepinephrine, or midodrine, depending on the local availability of drugs or facilities. Currently, approximately 40 % of patients will respond to a combination of vasoconstrictor and albumin. All patients with HRS1 should be assessed for liver transplant. If accepted for liver transplantation, those patients who do not respond to vasocontrictors and albumin need to be started on renal replacement therapy, which otherwise has no place in the treatment of HRS1. Once listed, liver transplantation should occur promptly, preferable under 2 weeks. Otherwise, the chances for renal recovery after liver transplant are significantly reduced, necessitating a renal transplant at the future date.

Updates on pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is one of the most detrimental conditions in patients with end stage liver cirrhosis and acute liver failure, with high morbidity and mortality. The pathophysiology of HRS is complex and has not been fully elucidated. The therapeutic approaches for HRS are limited, among them, terlipressin in combination with albumin infusion is the first line choice. Liver transplantation remains the most effective treatment method. Patients with HRS often experience poor prognosis and have low survival, and early diagnosis of HRS may play a critical role in making treatment plans and improving the prognosis. Currently, it is needed to enhance the reliability of diagnostic methods and the feasibility of therapeutic regimens, which can improve the quality of life and reduce the family and social financial burden. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of HRS.

[Hepatorenal syndrome: focus]

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a severe complication of cirrhosis. It develops as a result of abnormal hemodynamics, leading to systemic vasodilatation and renal vasoconstriction. Increased bacterial translocation, various cytokines and systemic inflammatory response system contribute to splanchnic vasodilatation, and altered renal autoregulation. An inadequate cardiac output with systolic incompetence increases the risk of renal failure. Type 1 HRS is usually initiated by a precipitating event associated with an exaggerated systemic inflammatory response, resulting in multiorgan failure. Vasoconstrictors are the basic treatment in patients with type 1 HRS; terlipressin is the superior agent. Norepinephrine can be used as an alternative. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt may be applicable in a small number of patients with type 1 HRS and in most patients with type 2 HRS. Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for HRS. The decision to do simultaneous or sequential liver and kidney transplant remains controversial. In general, patients who need more than 8 to 12 weeks of pretransplant dialysis should be considered for combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Results of pretransplant treatment of hepatorenal syndrome with terlipressin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a dreaded complication of end-stage liver disease. The best treatment option for HRS is liver transplantation (LT) in suitable candidates. Pretransplant care of HRS is of utmost importance in order to secure a good posttransplant outcome. We review the advances during the last year in the diagnosis and management of HRS in candidates who are awaiting liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

New attempts at defining renal failure in cirrhosis using the Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) definition have been proposed, as this definition has the potential advantage of detecting earlier phases of kidney dysfunction. Patients who undergo liver transplantation with acute tubular necrosis recover renal function more slowly than those with HRS and have a higher incidence of chronic kidney disease at all time points after liver transplantation. Vasoconstrictor drugs, particularly terlipressin, are effective for the management of HRS; however, noradrenaline is a good choice if terlipressin is not available. Long-term treatment of HRS with vasoconstrictors until liver transplantation in those patients with HRS recurrence after the first treatment is beneficial as a bridge to liver transplantation. Data from the cohorts of patients treated with vasoconstrictors (terlipressin and midodrine) indicate that liver transplantation offers a clear survival benefit to patients with HRS regardless of prior therapy with these drugs.

SUMMARY

Ongoing advances in the management of patients with HRS before liver transplantation indicate that vasoconstrictors plus albumin should be offered to all suitable candidates. Liver transplantation remains the best treatment option for HRS.

Hepatorenal syndrome, MELD score and liver transplantation: an evolving issue with relevant implications for clinical practice

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a severe complication of cirrhosis that is associated with poor survival. A rapid diagnosis of HRS and a prompt initiation of the treatment with terlipressin and albumin are mandatory because this leads to an improvement of prognosis. This review covers the predictive value of HRS on 3-month mortality beyond the MELD score and its consequential impact on the prioritization policy to liver transplantation (LT). Moreover, it analyzes the impact of the response to pharmacological treatment on the MELD score, its possible delaying effect on the timing of LT, and suggests a way of overcoming the paradoxical effect of terlipressin and albumin on the priority to LT in responders. Finally, the review discusses the appropriate use of combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) in patients with HRS who do not respond to treatment with terlipressin and albumin.

Liver transplantation in adults: Choosing the appropriate timing

Liver transplantation is indicated in patients with acute liver failure, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and rare liver-based genetic defects that trigger damage of other organs. Early referral to a transplant center is crucial in acute liver failure due to the high mortality with medical therapy and its unpredictable evolution. Referral to a transplant center should be considered when at least one complication of cirrhosis occurs during its natural history. However, because of the shortage of organ donors and the short-term mortality after liver transplantation on one hand and the possibility of managing the complications of cirrhosis with other treatments on the other, patients are carefully selected by the transplant center to ensure that transplantation is indicated and that there are no medical, surgical and psychological contraindications. Patients approved for transplantation are placed on the transplant waiting list and prioritized according to disease severity. Thus, the appropriate timing of transplantation depends on recipient disease severity and, although this is still a matter of debate, also on donor quality. These two variables are known to determine the “transplant benefit” (i.e., when the expected patient survival is better with, than without, transplantation) and should guide donor allocation.

Recent advances in our understanding of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a serious complication of advanced cirrhosis with ascites. HRS develops as a result of abnormal haemodynamics, leading to splanchnic and systemic vasodilatation, but renal vasoconstriction. Increased bacterial translocation, various cytokines and mesenteric angiogenesis also contribute to splanchnic vasodilatation, and altered renal autoregulation is involved in the renal vasoconstriction. Type 1 HRS is usually initiated by a precipitating event associated with an exaggerated systemic inflammatory response that perturbs haemodynamics, resulting in multiorgan failure. An inadequate cardiac output with systolic incompetence increases the risk of renal failure. Vasoconstrictors are the main treatment in patients with type 1 HRS; terlipressin is the superior agent. Norepinephrine is similar to terlipressin in efficacy and can be used as an alternative. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt might be applicable in a small number of patients with type 1 HRS and in most patients with type 2 HRS. Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for HRS, and should be performed after reversal of HRS. In nonresponders to vasoconstrictor therapy, much controversy still exists as to whether to do simultaneous or sequential liver and kidney transplant. In general, patients who have had >8-12 weeks of pretransplant dialysis should be considered for combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Hepatorenal syndrome: a severe, but treatable, cause of kidney failure in cirrhosis

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a unique type of kidney failure that occurs in advanced cirrhosis. It is characterized by functional impairment of the kidneys due to vasoconstriction of the renal arteries in the setting of preserved tubular function and absence of significant histologic abnormalities. Renal vasoconstriction in HRS is due to severe vasodilation of the splanchnic arteries associated with portal hypertension, leading to a decrease in effective arterial blood volume and arterial pressure. HRS commonly develops after a trigger, usually a bacterial infection, that disrupts the arterial circulation, but it also may occur spontaneously. There are 2 forms of HRS: type 1 is characterized by an acute progressive decrease in kidney function and very short survival without treatment, whereas type 2 features stable less severe kidney failure and longer survival compared with type 1. A liver transplant is the preferred treatment for HRS. Pharmacologic treatment with vasoconstrictors to reverse splanchnic vasodilation, together with albumin, is effective in 40%-50% of patients with type 1 HRS and improves survival. The drug of choice is the vasopressin analogue terlipressin. Renal replacement therapy should not be used as first-line therapy.