Management of primary symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation: a systematic review

Complications and outcomes of post-transplant lymphocele management: a 30-year retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines recommend percutaneous drainage as the first-line approach for the management of symptomatic lymphoceles following renal transplantation, with surgical fenestration reserved for refractory or recurrent cases. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of these therapeutic strategies in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 109 renal transplant recipients with symptomatic lymphoceles treated between 1993 and 2023 at a single public center was conducted. Recipients were followed from lymphocele diagnosis through treatment to resolution.

RESULTS

Percutaneous drainage was performed as the initial treatment in 101 recipients, while 8 underwent primary fenestration. Among patients treated with drainage, 43.5% developed infections, with infection risk increasing with catheter placement duration: odds ratio (OR) 2.57 (p = 0.28) at 2 weeks, 15.0 (p = 0.003) at 4 weeks, and 20.2 (p = 0.002) at 6 weeks. Resolution with drainage alone occurred in 54.8% of cases after a median of 39 days. The remaining patients required fenestration as a second-line treatment. No significant difference was observed in the total duration of hospital stay between the two methods.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged percutaneous drainage for post-transplant lymphoceles is associated with high infection rates and limited efficacy, warranting its use primarily for renal function stabilization or diagnostic purposes. Further studies are necessary to investigate alternative management strategies that may improve outcomes and reduce complications in recipients with symptomatic lymphoceles following renal transplantation.

Surgical and Infectious Complications Following Kidney Transplantation: A Contemporary Review

Kidney transplantation significantly improves outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease; however, postoperative complications remain a substantial concern. This review summarizes the incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for common complications after kidney transplantation. Reported incidence varies widely due to differences in definitions, diagnostic methods, and study designs. Ureteral stenosis occurs in 2.8-18.0% of recipients, vesicoureteral reflux in 0.5-86%, and urinary leakage in 1.1-7.2%. Lymphatic complications, including lymphocele and lymphorrhea, range from 0.6% to 35.2%, with one-third of complications requiring intervention. The incidence of urinary tract infections ranges from 20 to 43%, while asymptomatic bacteriuria is reported in up to 53% of recipients. Surgical site infections have a median incidence of 3.7%, and incisional hernias develop in 2.5-10% of cases, depending on follow-up duration. Vascular complications affect approximately 10% of recipients, with renal artery stenosis and thrombosis being the most prevalent. Neurologic complications, such as femoral nerve palsy and immunosuppression-related neurotoxicity, though less frequent, can impair recovery. Management strategies vary depending on severity, ranging from observation to surgical intervention. Preventive measures-including optimized ureteral stenting protocols, early catheter removal, careful immunosuppression, and appropriate antimicrobial use-play a crucial role in reducing complication risk. Despite advances in transplantation techniques and perioperative care, these complications continue to affect graft survival and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to standardize definitions and establish evidence-based protocols.

Are drain essentials in kidney transplantation? Analysis of risk factors affecting the postoperative drainage

OBJECTIVE

The routine drain placement following renal transplantation is currently under debate. Its benefit is uncertain and may cause complications, particularly infectious ones. Some renal transplant patients have low-productive drains, that might be unnecessary. The objective of this study is to bring to light factors influencing drain volume in kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All kidney transplant patients in Tours between 2019 and 2020 were included. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed: patients with low-productive redons (quantification less than 100mL/24h,) and patients with productive redons (≥ 100mL/24h). Univariate and multivariate analyses by logistic regression were performed to look for risk factors associated with productive drainage.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-nine patients were included (67 in the low-productive group and 122 in the productive group). The results in the productive group showed a significantly higher proportion of retransplantation (P=0.015), overweight (P=0.012), low residual diuresis (P=0.041), and a significantly lower proportion of preemptive transplantation (P=0.008) and peritoneal dialysis (P=0.037). After an adjustment, the following variables remained significantly associated with greater drainage: overweight (OR=2.42, P=0.014; 95% CI [1.2-4.94]); retransplantation (OR=3.98, P=0.027; 95% CI [1.27-15.45]), and preemptive transplant (OR=0.22, P=0.013; 95% CI [0.06-0.7]).

CONCLUSION

The non-implementation of a redon in renal transplantation could be considered, in a selected population of non-overweight patients, with significant residual diuresis for a first transplantation which should be preemptive. This could lead to a randomized controlled trial to determine the real benefits of a routine drain replacement in kidney transplantation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Transplantation: Update 2024

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU) Panel on Renal Transplantation released an updated version of the renal transplantation (RT) guidelines. This report aims to present the 2024 EAU guidelines on RT.

METHODS

A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of RT guidelines published between May 31, 2020 and April 1, 2023 was performed. Databases covered by the search included Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

It is strongly recommended to offer pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgery for living donor nephrectomy. One should not base decisions regarding the acceptance of a donor organ on histological findings alone, since this might lead to an unnecessary high rate of discarded grafts. For the ureterovesical anastomosis, a Lich-Gregoir-like extravesical technique protected by a ureteral stent is the preferred technique. A list of RT patients with a history of appropriately treated low-stage/grade renal cell carcinoma or prostate cancer should be made without additional delay. In the potential donor kidney, the main surgical tumoral approach is ex vivo tumor excision and finally transplantation. It is also strongly recommended to perform initial rejection prophylaxis with a combination therapy of a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus), mycophenolate, steroids, and an induction agent (either basiliximab or antithymocyte globulin). The long version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website (www.uroweb.org/guidelines).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the clinical and surgical management of RT for incorporation into clinical practice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology has released the renal transplantation guidelines. Implementation of minimally invasive surgery for organ retrieval and the latest evidence on transplant surgery as well as on immunosuppressive regimens are key to minimizing rejection and achieving long-term graft survival.

Modified Peritoneal Fenestration as a Preventive Method for Lymphocele after Kidney Transplantation: A Preliminary Report

Background: We aimed to assess the safety of a modified peritoneal fenestration technique with clipping of the window edges during kidney transplantation (KTx) and to determine its impact on reducing lymphocele following KTx. We compared the outcomes of this modified method with those of peritoneal fenestration without clipping. Methods: Among 430 consecutive KTxs performed between 2015 and 2019, preventive peritoneal fenestration and clipping of the margins were performed in 25 patients. These patients were compared with 75 matched patients in whom the margins were not clipped. Postoperative lymphocele formation and other patient data were compared between these two groups. Results: The rate of clinically relevant lymphocele decreased by 2.7% after peritoneal fenestration with clipping, although this decrease was not statistically significant (p = 0.829). There was no significant increase in the rate of other complications in the modified fenestration group (p = 0.067). The incidence of clinically significant lymphocele formation was notably higher in patients with a body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 (p = 0.028). Univariate analysis indicated that older recipients, individuals with a history of previous abdominal surgery, those receiving the kidney from deceased and older donors were at increased risk of developing a clinically relevant lymphocele. Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that peritoneal fenestration with clipping may be as effective as the conventional fenestration technique in preventing lymphocele formation. Further clinical trials with larger sample sizes are required to determine the exact role of preventive peritoneal fenestration with clipping in preventing clinically relevant lymphocele after KTx.

Blunt Trauma-Induced Lymphocele in the Groin - An Uncommon Complication and Management Considerations: A Case Report

Lymphoceles are common complications after certain surgical procedures. Blunt trauma can occasionally result in similar lymph accumulation. Herein, we present the rare case of a patient who developed a lymphocele in his right groin following a blunt trauma from a fallen tree branch. Aspiration and sclerotherapy were unsuccessful, and the lesion ultimately required surgical excision. Lymphoceles should be considered a rare differential diagnosis for post-traumatic cystic swelling, and their management should follow similar guidelines to those used for post-surgical lymphocele management.

Approach to Kidney Allograft Dysfunction: A Brief Review

It is important for providers caring for kidney transplant recipients to be familiar with the common causes of allograft dysfunction. Early detection of allograft dysfunction leads to timely management, with the goal of preventing or delaying progression to allograft failure. Although transplant rejection is always a concern, the differential diagnoses for allograft dysfunction are broad and include perioperative complications, infections, recurrent disease, and calcineurin nephrotoxicity. In this review, we will go over early and late causes of allograft dysfunction and discuss the basic workup and principles of management for each condition.

Duodenal stenosis due to small lymphocele after para-aortic lymphadenectomy: A case report and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

We present an unusual case of a small para-aortic lymphocele causing duodenal stenosis after lymphadenectomy and discuss its treatment.

CASE REPORT

Our case involved a 57-year-old woman with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery, including para-aortic lymphadenectomy. On postoperative day 7, projectile vomiting occurred. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a small lymphocele in the dorsal duodenum, causing duodenal stenosis. Transpercutaneous and transduodenal puncture or surgical procedures were difficult because the cyst was too small. Per endoscopic and gastrointestinal series findings on the postoperative day 22, a liquid diet was presumed to be able to pass through the narrow portion. Hence, concentrated liquid food was administered orally; no vomiting occurred. At 2 months postoperatively, CT showed no lymphocele.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment involving waiting for spontaneous lymphocele reduction with a concentrated fluid diet may be considered in such cases if fluid passage is confirmed with endoscopy and gastrointestinal series.

Abdominal lymphocele following multi-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) managed with a laparoscopic peritoneal window: case report and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Lymphocele formation following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is not common, but it can pose diagnostic and treatment challenges. The purpose of this case is to report for the first time the treatment of a postoperative lymphocele following a multi-level ALIF using a peritoneal window made through a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

A 74-year-old male with a history of prostatectomy and pelvic radiation underwent a staged L3-S1 ALIF (left paramedian approach) and T10-pelvis posterior instrumented with L1-5 decompression/posterior column osteotomies for degenerative scoliosis and neurogenic claudication. Three weeks after surgery, swelling of the left abdomen and entire left leg was reported. Computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis demonstrated a large (19.2 × 12.0 × 15.4 cm) retroperitoneal fluid collection with compression of the left ureter and left common iliac vein. Fluid analysis (80% lymphocytes) was consistent with a lymphocele. Percutaneous drainage for 4 days was ineffective at clearing the lymphocele. For more definitive management, the patient underwent an uncomplicated laparoscopic creation of a peritoneal window to allow passive drainage of lymphatic fluid into the abdomen. Three years after surgery, he had no back or leg pain, had achieved spinal union, and had no abdominal swelling or left leg swelling. Advanced imaging also confirmed resolution of the lymphocele.

CONCLUSIONS

In this case report, creation of a peritoneal window minimally invasively via a laparoscope allowing passive drainage of lymphatic fluid into the abdomen was safe and effective for management of an abdominal lymphocele following a multi-level ALIF.

Sclerotherapy of the Post renal Transplant Lymphoceles: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the effectiveness of sclerotherapy in treating lymphoceles after kidney transplantation, focusing on factors such as recurrence rates and procedural success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective studies using sclerotherapy as the only form of treatment for postrenal transplant lymphoceles were included. All studies used percutaneous transcatheter sclerotherapy as treatment, and the success rate of the intervention was recorded. Sixty-one references were obtained by manually searching the MEDLINE (n = 20), Embase (n = 41), and Cochrane Library databases (n = 0) for retrospective research studies that included the keywords "sclerotherapy post renal transplant lymphoceles." After removing 3 duplicates, 50 of the remaining articles were excluded after the screening, and the remaining studies were extracted for demographic data and our primary outcome of the success rate of sclerotherapy.

RESULTS

A descriptive analysis of the outcomes and complication rates associated with sclerotherapy interventions for lymphoceles is provided. A high degree of variation across the different studies was observed. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, there was no correlation between the sclerosant used and the sclerotherapy complication rate (P = .472) or the success rate (P = .591). There was also no correlation between the gender of the patient and the success rate; however, there was a significant difference in the complication rate by gender (P < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, different sclerosant products have been used for therapy with no consensus on the most efficacious product because the success rate has been variable. In addition, the gender of the patient may influence the complication rates associated with sclerotherapy for lymphoceles in patients post-kidney transplant.

Lymphocele Complication After Kidney Transplant: Current Literature Review and Management Algorithm

Kidney transplant is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. It reduces mortality and improves the quality of life. However, kidney transplant presents medical and surgical complications, and one of the most common is the posttransplant lymphocele. Lymphocele complication has an incidence of up to 20% and presents with variable clinical symptoms, which are directly associated with the size and compression effect on the adjacent organs. There are reported risk factors that favor the appearance of lymphocele. Despite known factors, there are more relevant factors (male sex, deceased donor, and corticosteroids) to carry out a stricter follow-up. The treatment of lymphoceles can vary according to the severity of the symptoms, characteristics of the collection, and the patient's clinical status. Despite the high recurrence, percutaneous intervention is the initial approach in this condition. If percutaneous aspiration, drainage, and sclerotherapy are unsuccessful, then open or laparoscopic fenestration can be performed; laparoscopy is the standard of treatment since it is highly effective and has few adverse effects.

Perirenal lymphatics: anatomy, pathophysiology, and imaging spectrum of diseases

Despite being rarely discussed, perinephric lymphatics are involved in many pathological and benign processes. The lymphatic system in the kidneys has a harmonious dynamic with ureteral and venous outflow, which can result in pathology when this dynamic is disturbed. Although limited by the small size of lymphatics, multiple established and emerging imaging techniques are available to visualize perinephric lymphatics. Manifestations of perirenal pathology may be in the form of dilation of perirenal lymphatics, as with peripelvic cysts and lymphangiectasia. Lymphatic collections may also occur, either congenital or as a sequela of renal surgery or transplantation. The perirenal lymphatics are also intimately involved in lymphoproliferative disorders, such as lymphoma as well as the malignant spread of disease. Although these pathologic entities often have overlapping imaging features, some have distinguishing characteristics that can suggest the diagnosis when paired with the clinical history.

Comparison of Bipolar Electrocautery-Based Vascular Sealers with Conventional Ligation in Iliac Vessel Preparation of Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphocele is a common complication with a potentially severe course and may require percutaneous drainage or open/percutaneous surgical intervention. Closure of the lymphatics around the iliac vessels is paramount in avoiding lymphocele formation. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bipolar electrocautery-based vascular sealers (BSD) in the dissection and/or ligation of lymphatic vessels in terms of the development of lymphoceles and postoperative kidney functions in live donor kidney transplants at our center.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients who underwent kidney transplantation (KTx) between January and December 2021 were included in the study. Data, including postoperative creatinine values and postoperative ultrasonography follow-up, were recorded. Thirty-seven patients who were operated on using conventional ligation for iliac vessel preparation were included in group 1. Twenty-six patients treated using BSD for iliac vessel preparation were included in group 2. Statistical analysis was performed to compare these groups. This study complied with The Helsinki Congress and The Declaration of Istanbul.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative first-week creatinine values (1.176 mg/dL vs 1.203 mg/dL), first-month creatinine values (1.061 mg/dL vs 1.091 mg/dL), first-week collection volume (33.240 mL vs 33.430 mL), and third-month collection volume (23.120 mL vs 23.430 mL) (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In KTx surgery, BSD is as safe as and faster than conventional ligation in preparation of the recipient's iliac vessels.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

The lymphatic vascular system: much more than just a sewer

Almost 400 years after the (re)discovery of the lymphatic vascular system (LVS) by Gaspare Aselli (Asellius G. De lactibus, sive lacteis venis, quarto vasorum mesaraicorum genere, novo invento Gasparis Asellii Cremo. Dissertatio. (MDCXXIIX), Milan; 1628.), structure, function, development and evolution of this so-called 'second' vascular system are still enigmatic. Interest in the LVS was low because it was (and is) hardly visible, and its diseases are not as life-threatening as those of the blood vascular system. It is not uncommon for patients with lymphedema to be told that yes, they can live with it. Usually, the functions of the LVS are discussed in terms of fluid homeostasis, uptake of chylomicrons from the gut, and immune cell circulation. However, the broad molecular equipment of lymphatic endothelial cells suggests that they possess many more functions, which are also reflected in the pathophysiology of the system. With some specific exceptions, lymphatics develop in all organs. Although basic structure and function are the same regardless their position in the body wall or the internal organs, there are important site-specific characteristics. We discuss common structure and function of lymphatics; and point to important functions for hyaluronan turn-over, salt balance, coagulation, extracellular matrix production, adipose tissue development and potential appetite regulation, and the influence of hypoxia on the regulation of these functions. Differences with respect to the embryonic origin and molecular equipment between somatic and splanchnic lymphatics are discussed with a side-view on the phylogeny of the LVS. The functions of the lymphatic vasculature are much broader than generally thought, and lymphatic research will have many interesting and surprising aspects to offer in the future.

Kidney delayed graft function after combined kidney-solid organ transplantation: A review

Kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) is a common post-kidney transplant complication associated with adverse outcomes. With continued advances in solid organ transplantation (SOT), combined kidney-solid organ transplantation (CKSOT) is an ever-growing transplant option for patients with advanced kidney disease in the setting of concurrent solid organ failure. K-DGF in this setting is understudied. In this review, we aimed to abridge the representative literature on K-DGF in CKSOT. K-DGF occurs at different rates across combined and sequential kidney-solid organ transplantation (SKSOT), in simultaneous-pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant (8-23%), simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplant (27-37%), simultaneous-liver kidney (SLiK) transplant (16-49%), and kidney after thoracic (13.6-19.2%) and abdominal (13.6-25%) transplantation. Though many K-DGF risk factors span across various subtypes of combined KSOT, some effect particular transplant types more specifically and may be modifiable to reduce K-DGF incidence. While more studies are needed to prevent and manage K-DGF in combined kidney-solid organ transplantation, we hope our review will provide context of this disease and spur further inquiry.

Minimal invasive treatment for post-liver and renal transplant lymphatic leaks

INTRODUCTION

Persistent lymphatic leakage from the surgical drain is a troubling complication occasionally encountered postoperatively. This study investigated lymphatic leaks after renal or liver transplantation, comparing the treatment efficacy of traditional catheter drainage vs. minimally invasive lymphatic interventions. We also discuss access and treatment targets considering the physiology of lymphatic flow.

METHODS

Between September 2018 and September 2020, 13 patients with lymphatic leakage were treated with minimally invasive lymphatic interventions; 11 had received a renal transplant, and two received a liver transplant. The control group included 10 patients with post-renal transplant lymphatic leakage treated with catheter drainage. The treatment efficacy of catheter drainage, lymphatic interventions, and different targets of embolization were compared.

RESULTS

The technical success rate for lymphatic intervention was 100%, and the clinical success rate was 92%, with an 82.9% percent reduction in drain volume on the first day after treatment. The duration to reach clinical success was 5.9 days with lymphatic intervention, and 33.9 days with conservative catheter drainage.

CONCLUSION

Lymphangiography and embolization are minimally invasive and efficient procedures for treating persistent lymphatic leaks after renal or liver transplantation. We suggest prompt diagnosis and embolization at upstream lymphatics to reduce the duration of drain retention, days of hospitalization and associated comorbidities. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Factors Influencing Lymphocele Development After Kidney Transplant: Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Lymphocele is a well-known postoperative surgical complication after kidney transplant. In this study, our aim was to analyze incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of posttransplant lymphocele in a large cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational study included 395 consecutive patients (219 males and 176 females) who underwent kidney transplant procedures from 183 living and 212 deceased donors in our center between January 2007 and 2014. A lymphocele was diagnosed with ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The incidence of lymphoceles in our cohort was 31.9% (n = 126). There were no significant dif-ferences with regard to body mass indexes, age of donors, deceased donor ratios, acute rejection episodes, and history of abdominal surgery between those with and without lymphoceles. The pre-transplant serum albumin levels (3.29 ± 0.67 vs 3.48 ± 0.69 g/dL; P = .009) in the lymphocele group and diabetes mellitus ratios (15.9% vs 4.5%; P < .001) in the nonlymphocele group were lower than levels shown in the other group. The lymphocele ratio in patients who received cyclosporine was higher than that shown in patients who did not received it (37.5% vs. 27.4%; P = .032). There was no difference in lymphocele incidence between patients who were taking and those who were not taking mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or mycophenolate sodium. In regression analysis, presence of diabetes mellitus, transplant from deceased donors, older age of donors, and lower albumin levels were independent risk factors for posttransplant lymphocele occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant lymphocele was a relatively common surgical complication in our cohort. We concluded that diabetes mellitus, use of kidneys from deceased donors, older donor age, and hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors for lymphocele development.

Retroperitoneal Viscum album extract instillation in patients with a large amount of drainage after kidney transplantation

Purpose

After kidney transplantation (KT), a large amount of drainage can delay postoperative recovery. Viscum album extract is an agent used in pleurodesis, and the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this agent in reducing the amount of drainage after KT.

Methods

Medical records of patients with a large amount of drainage (≥ 100 mL/day) on postoperative day (POD) 7 after KT who had undergone V. album extract instillation through drainage tube (n = 115) or conservative management (n = 177) were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the amount of drainage on POD 14 from POD 7.

Results

A decrease in the amount of drainage on POD 14 from POD 7 was larger in the V. album extract instillation group than in the conservative management group (–228.3 ± 181.6 mL vs. –144.6 ± 202.0 mL, P < 0.001). Duration of hospitalization after operation was shorter in the V. album extract instillation group than in the conservative management group (15.9 ± 3.2 days vs. 18.1 ± 5.3 days, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, there was a statistically significant association of V. album extract instillation with lower risk of persistent large amount of drainage (≥ 100 mL/day on POD 14), with an odds ratio of 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.35–0.93; P = 0.026).

Conclusion

Retroperitoneal V. album extract instillation could be effective in reducing the amount of drainage and promoting postoperative recovery in patients with a large amount of drainage after KT.

Validating Consensus-Defined Severity Grading of Lymphatic Complications after Kidney Transplant

Lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation (KTx) are associated with morbidities such as impaired wound healing, thrombosis, and organ failure. Recently, a consensus regarding the definition and severity grading of lymphoceles has been suggested. The aim of the present study was to validate this classification method. All adult patients who underwent KTx between December 2011 and September 2016 in our department were evaluated regarding lymphoceles that were diagnosed within 6 months after KTx based on the recent definition. Patients with lymphoceles were categorized according to the classification criteria, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. In our department, a total of 587 patients underwent KTx between 2011 and 2016. Lymphoceles were detected after KTx in 90 patients (15.3%). Among these patients, 24 (26.6%) had grade A lymphoceles, 14 (15.6%) had grade B, and 52 (57.8%) had grade C. The median duration times of intermediate care (IMC) and hospital stay were significantly higher among patients with grade C lymphoceles than they were among patients with grade A and B lymphoceles. Significantly more patients with grade C lymphoceles were readmitted to the hospital for treatment. The recently published definition and severity grading of lymphoceles after KTx is an easy-to-use and valid classification system, which may facilitate the comparison of results from different studies on lymphoceles after KTx.

Therapeutic Lymphangiography for Persistent Lymphatic Leak After Kidney Transplant: A Novel Technique

Lymphatic leakage is a common and well-described complication after kidney transplantation, occurring in up to 25% of patients. Accumulation of lymph is due to the surgical disruption of recipient lymphatic channels accompanying the external iliac vessels, complicated by lower extremity edema, wound breakdown, infection, and, if unresolved, graft loss due to extrinsic compression. In this report, we describe the novel use of diagnostic and therapeutic lymphangiography to successfully treat lymphatic leak after renal transplant that was resistant to drain placement, sclerotherapy, and laparoscopic peritoneal window creation. We also describe the methodology, indications, and contraindications and conclude that this technique is well-tolerated and offers a good option for complex lymph leaks that do not respond to conventional treatment. Further studies are required to compare its efficacy with other standard methods, including sclerotherapy and laparoscopic peritoneal fenestration, as the primary treatment modality.

Laparoscopic approach for symptomatic pelvic and para-aortic lymphoceles

Description and demonstration of the feasibility of laparoscopic management of symptomatic pelvic lymphocele after surgical staging in gynecological cancer surgery. Step-by-step description of the surgical procedure using pictures and an educational video. Patient gave informed consent for the use of images and the full video article was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital of Sant Pau. Lymphocele is one of the most common complications of pelvic or lumbo-aortic lymphadenectomy. Although the incidence is variable at 1-58%, around 5-18% of cases are symptomatic. Only symptomatic lymphocele requires treatment, which can be medical or interventional. Drainage is usuallyperformed by guided radiology although a surgical approach has shown a lower rate of recurrence. A 64-years-old woman diagnosed withendometrial carcinosarcoma was staged laparoscopically by pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy wasperformed using an extraperitoneal approach. Three weeks later she presented with an intense and persistent burning pain, radiating towardsthe left leg. Computed tomography imaging suggested the presence of a 10x7.6 cm lymphocele adjacent to the left external iliac vessels.Laparoscopy was performed with four-port placement configuration, enabling the identification of a large, bilobed lymphocele, adjacent to theleft pelvic wall and left paracolic gutter. Adhesiolysis and identification of main landmarks in the left paracolic gutter and left paravesical fossawas performed as a first step. Peritoneum of each lymphocele was opened in the caudal region and the opening was broadened to facilitatelymph drainage. Owing to the low morbidity and excellent results, we suggest that laparoscopic drainage should be performed as a feasible anduseful treatment for pelvic symptomatic lymphoceles.

Intraperitoneal Ultrasound-Guided Safe Laparoscopic Fenestration of Lymphocele After Kidney Transplantation

Background: Lymphocele is a common complication after kidney transplantation, which does not require treatment unless it is symptomatic. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical symptoms, treatment choices, and success of different treatment methods of symptomatic lymphocele. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 168 patients who had kidney transplantation between January 2012 and January 2020. Patients with decreased kidney functions due to lymphocele formation during the clinical follow-up were included in the study. External drainage catheter was placed in all patients, except one. In case of treatment failure with external drainage, laparoscopic fenestration guided by intraperitoneal ultrasonography was performed. Clinical symptoms and success rates of treatments were evaluated. Results: Symptomatic lymphocele requiring interventional treatment was detected in 15 (8.9%) of 168 renal transplant patients. All of the symptomatic lymphocele cases had increased serum creatinine levels, whereas 10 had decreased urine volume, 4 had abdominal discomfort, and 2 had ipsilateral lower extremity edema. External drainage catheter was placed as the first-line treatment in 13 patients. In 6 cases, due to treatment failure with external drainage and in 2 patients as a first-choice treatment, laparoscopic fenestration was performed. No lymphocele recurrence was observed during follow-up. Conclusion: Among various methods defined in the treatment of lymphocele, use of laparoscopic fenestration is increasing because of its high success rate and advantages over other methods. Intraperitoneal ultrasound-guided laparoscopic fenestration is a useful and safe method that can be performed as a first-choice treatment since it eliminates the risk of organ injury or bleeding.

Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Lymphocele After Renal Transplantation: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent advances, lymphoceles are the most frequent complications following renal transplantation (RT), with an incidence of 0.6% to 51%. In this study, we present risk factors, treatments, and outcomes for lymphoceles after RT at our center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since January 2018, 461 RTs were performed at our center. Nine recipients were excluded. The remaining 452 RTs were analyzed retrospectively. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: a lymphocele group (n = 29) and a nonlymphocele group (n = 423). Lymphoceles were diagnosed by ultrasound. Statistical analyses were made using the SPSS 15 software program.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (6.4%) of the 452 recipients developed lymphoceles. Seven of these 29 (24.1%) recipients were asymptomatic. The most common symptom was hydronephrosis (34.4%). Percutaneous drainage was performed in 21 recipients; sclerotherapy with percutaneous drainage was used in the remaining 8. In 5 (17.2%) recipients, there was a recurrence of lymphoceles. There were significant differences with respect to age (50-65 years; P = .016), use of a drainage catheter (P = .044), and polycystic kidney diseases (P = .049).

CONCLUSION

Lymphoceles can be treated successfully using the percutaneous drainage technique alone or in combination with povidone iodine. Drainage use, polycystic kidney disease, and age (50-65 years) were established as risk factors for lymphocele development.

Egyptian clinical practice guideline for kidney transplantation

Objective: To present the first Egyptian clinical practice guideline for kidney transplantation (KT).

Methods: A panel of multidisciplinary subspecialties related to KT prepared this document. The sources of information included updates of six international guidelines, and review of several relevant international and Egyptian publications. All statements were graded according to the strength of clinical practice recommendation and the level of evidence. All recommendations were discussed by the panel members who represented most of the licensed Egyptian centres practicing KT.

Results: Recommendations were given on preparation, surgical techniques and surgical complications of both donors and recipients. A special emphasis was made on the recipient’s journey with immunosuppression. It starts with setting the scene by covering the donor and recipient evaluations, medicolegal requirements, recipient’s protective vaccines, and risk assessment. It spans desensitisation and induction strategies to surgical approach and potential complications, options of maintenance immunosuppression, updated treatment of acute rejection and chemoprophylactic protocols. It ends with monitoring for potential complications of the recipient’s suppressed immunity and the short- and long-term complications of immunosuppressive drugs. It highlights the importance of individualisation of immunosuppression strategies consistent with pre-KT risk assessment. It emphasises the all-important role of anti-human leucocyte antigen antibodies, particularly the donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), in acute and chronic rejection, and eventual graft and patient survival. It addresses the place of DSAs across the recipient’s journey with his/her gift of life.

Conclusion: This guideline introduces the first proposed standard of good clinical practice in the field of KT in Egypt.

Abbreviations: Ab: antibody; ABMR: Ab-mediated rejection; ABO: ABO blood groups; BKV: BK polyomavirus; BMI: body mass index; BTS: British Transplantation Society; CAN: chronic allograft nephropathy; CDC: complement-dependent cytotoxicity; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CMV: cytomegalovirus; CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; CPRA: Calculated Panel Reactive Antibodies; (dn)DSA: (de novo) donor-specific antibodies; ECG: electrocardiogram; ESWL: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; FCM: flow cytometry; GBM: glomerular basement membrane; GN: glomerulonephritis; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; HLA: human leucocyte antigen; HPV: human papilloma virus; IL2-RA: interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; IVIg: intravenous immunoglobulin; KT(C)(R): kidney transplantation/transplant (candidate) (recipient); (L)(O)LDN: (laparoscopic) (open) live-donor nephrectomy; MBD: metabolic bone disease; MCS: Mean channel shift (in FCM-XM); MFI: mean fluorescence intensity; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; mTOR(i): mammalian target of rapamycin (inhibitor); NG: ‘not graded’; PAP: Papanicolaou smear; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; PKTU: post-KT urolithiasis; PLEX: plasma exchange; PRA: panel reactive antibodies; PSI: proliferation signal inhibitor; PTA: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; RAS: renal artery stenosis; RAT: renal artery thrombosis;:rATG: rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RIS: Relative MFI Score; RVT: renal vein thrombosis; TB: tuberculosis; TCMR: T-cell-mediated rejection; URS: ureterorenoscopy; (CD)US: (colour Doppler) ultrasonography; VCUG: voiding cystourethrogram; XM: cross match; ZN: Ziehl–Neelsen stain

Povidone-iodine sclerotherapy of primary symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To report the efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine sclerotherapy of primary symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation in a large contemporary cohort study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-institutional study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent povidone-iodine sclerotherapy for primary symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation between January 2013 and March 2020. Sclerotherapy was used as the first-line treatment of symptomatic lymphocele. Recurrent lymphoceles were managed with open or laparoscopic fenestration. The primary outcome was the efficacy of sclerotherapy which was defined as the absence of second sclerotherapy or salvage surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 965 renal transplantations were included. Sclerotherapy for primary symptomatic lymphocele was performed in 60 cases (6.2%). The median (IQR) number of instillation, the volume of povidone-iodine per instillation and drainage time were 3 (3-3), 60 (38-80) mL and 6 days (5-8), respectively. Sclerotherapy related complications were reported in eight cases (13.3%) and included five cases of accidental catheter removal, two cases of lumbosciatica, and one case of intraperitoneal diffusion of povidone-iodine. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 33 (14-60) months, treatment success was achieved in 33 cases (55%). Multivariate analysis failed to identify predictors of sclerotherapy failure. Salvage therapies included 7 s sclerotherapy and 20 surgical fenestrations with an overall success rate of 88.8% (24/27).

CONCLUSIONS

Sclerotherapy was an easy and safe procedure to treat primary symptomatic lymphocele in renal transplant recipients. Despite moderate efficacy, recurrences were easily controlled with salvage therapies. Further studies are necessary to identify predictive factors of sclerotherapy failure to directly refer patients to surgical treatment.

PREventive effect of FENestration with and without clipping on post-kidney transplantation lymphatic complications (PREFEN): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal fenestration is an effective preventive method for reducing the rate of lymphatic complications in kidney transplantation (KTx). The size of the fenestration plays an important role in its effectiveness. A large peritoneal window is no longer indicated, due to herniation and difficulties in performing biopsies. Small preventive fenestration is effective but will be closed too early. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether metal clips around the edges of a small fenestration result in optimal effects with minimum fenestration size.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This trial has been initiated in July 2019 and is expected to last for 2 and a half years. All patients older than 18 years, who receive kidneys from deceased donors, will be included. The kidney recipients will be randomly allocated to either a control arm (small fenestration alone) or an intervention arm (small fenestration with clipping). All fenestrations will be round, maximum 2 cm, and close to the kidney hilum. Clipping will be performed with eight metal clips around the peritoneal window (360°) in every 45° in an oblique position. The primary endpoint is the incidence of symptomatic post-KTx lymphatic complications, which require interventional treatment within 6 months after KTx. Secondary endpoints are intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, severity grade of lymphocele/lymphorrhea and relative symptoms.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg (Registration Number S-318/2017). A Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist is available for this protocol. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03682627).

Renal Lymphangiectasia in the Transplanted Kidney: Case Series and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Renal lymphangiectasia is a rare and poorly understood lymphatic disease associated with lymphatic dilation and leakage. To our knowledge, no cases have been described in the context of a transplanted kidney.

METHODS

We describe 2 cases of renal lymphangiectasia in transplanted kidneys, both from pediatric donors.

RESULTS

The cases of allograft lymphangiectasia are characterized by severe, symptomatic ascites refractory to attempts at medical and surgical management, and ultimately requiring allograft nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

While lymphatic complications, particularly lymphoceles, are not uncommon in renal transplantation, lymphangiectasia is a distinct condition which should be considered in renal transplant patients with ascites, after all other sources have been ruled out.

Aponeurotic-Cutaneous Tract Exeresis in Patients With Persistent Lymphorrhea After Kidney Transplantation: A Valid Approach in a Day Surgery Setting

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic disorders (LDs) are the most common minor complications after kidney transplantation (KT), with an incidence rate between 0.6% and 33.9%, which appears to be related to both surgical and medical factors. LDs mostly resolve spontaneously, but occasionally a surgical approach may be required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report our experience with 7 KT recipients who developed persistent lymphorrhea (>150 mL/24 h) between October 2017 and March 2019. All cases were treated as outpatients with parietal fistulectomy (PF). The fibrotic aponeurotic-cutaneous tract was thoroughly excised, and the residual aponeurotic defect was closed by watertight suturing. Serial abdominal ultrasounds (US) were carried out after the procedure.

RESULTS

A small perirenal graft lymphocele of <2 cm was detected by US in all patients after 48 to 72 hours, without any evidence of either vascular or ureteral compression. During the subsequent scheduled US follow-up, lymphoceles did not increase in size, and additional interventions were not needed. Neither superficial nor deep surgical-site infections were recorded in such patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PF was found to be a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for persistent lymphorrhea after KT. It could be easily performed with local anesthesia in a day surgery setting and did not require patient hospitalization.

Intranodal lymphangio-embolisation as treatment for lymphocele after kidney transplantation: A case report

Introduction and objectives:

The rate of symptomatic lymphoceles requiring intervention after renal transplantation is reported to be only 5.6%. Controversies prevail in the current literature regarding the management of symptomatic lymphoceles post renal transplantation, with no established algorithm. The creation of a peritoneal window, frequently performed laparoscopically, is deemed the gold standard for management. We herin report the case of a lymphocele post renal transplant treated minimally invasively with intranodal lymphangio-embolisation, with a review of the current literature of this uncommon procedure.

Methods:

This was a retrospective review of this patient’s electronic medical records.

Results:

We present a 43-year-old male with end-stage kidney disease secondary to chronic glomerulonephritis, having been on hemodialysis for seven years. He underwent a deceased donor dual kidney transplant, complicated postoperatively by renal vein thrombosis in one of the grafts, resulting in early graft nephrectomy as well as a distal ureterovesical leak requiring reimplantation. On re-implantation on postoperative day 16, he was noted to have a persistent high drain ouput with a normal drain fluid creatinine. A right intranodal lymphagiogram was performed, and this demonstrated an active lymph leak around the transplanted kidney. A 33% glue (N-butyl cyanoacrylate)-Lipodiol infusion was then injected at a rate of 0.2 mL/min intranodally under fluoroscopic guidance. The patient underwent another repeat embolisation five days later for a residual lymph leak with satisfactory results. Drain output subsequently decreased, and the drain was removed.

Conclusions:

This case suggests that intranodal lymphangiography and embolisation may not only be a diagnostic tool but can be considered as an effective, minimally invasive and safe method for the treatment of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation.

Microbiological analysis of infectious lymphocele: Case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Infectious lymphocele is a rare post-operative complication of abdominal surgery, and few studies have focused on its causative organisms. The aim in this research is to clarify microbiology and appropriate empiric treatment of infective lymphocele.

METHODS

We performed a single center, retrospective observational study between April 2000 and March 2018 with a case review and literature search. Data were collected in a chart review.

RESULTS

Twenty-four cases were founded in our institution. 153 cases, including 16 cases from our institution, that detected causative organisms was also analyzed. Infectious lymphocele was found to occur post gynecological/urological surgery in cancer patients. We also reported that bacteremia incidence and the mortality rate of infectious lymphocele cases were very low. The major sites of infectious lymphocele were pelvis or inguinal area. Our case series and literature review showed Gram positive cocci were the major causative organisms, with Staphylococcus aureus constituting one third of them (53/153 cases). Streptococcus species (26/153cases) and coagulase negative Staphylococci (17/153 cases) were the second and third most detected organisms.

CONCLUSION

In gynecologic and urologic cancer patients, Gram positive cocci were the most common organisms causing lymphocele infection. Gram-positive coverage might be reasonable for empiric therapy in infectious lymphocele.

Analysis of Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Patients with Identified Lymphoceles

The collection of lymphatic fluids (lymphoceles) is a frequent adverse event following renal transplantation. A variety of surgical and medical factors has been linked to this entity, but reliable data on risk factors and long-term outcomes are lacking. This retrospective single-center study included 867 adult transplant recipients who received a kidney transplantation from 2006 to 2015. We evaluated for patient and graft survival, rejection episodes, or detectable donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in patients with identified lymphoceles in comparison to controls. We identified 305/867 (35.2%) patients with lymphocele formation, of whom 72/867 (8.3%) needed intervention. Multivariate analysis identified rejection episode as an independent risk factor (OR 1.61, CI 95% 1.17–2.21, p = 0.003) for lymphocele formation, while delayed graft function was independently associated with symptomatic lymphoceles (OR 1.9, CI 95% 1.16–3.12, p = 0.011). Interestingly, there was no difference in detectable dnDSA between groups with a similar graft and patient survival in all groups after 10 years. Lymphoceles frequently occur after transplantation and were found to be independently associated with rejection episodes, while symptomatic lymphoceles were associated with delayed graft function in our cohort. As both are inflammatory processes, they might play a causative role in the formation of lymphoceles. However, development or intervention of lymphoceles did not lead to impaired graft survival in the long-term.

Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

Objectives

This study aims to present our cadaveric and living related donor kidney transplantation experience.

Methods

Between September 2009 to February 2015, renal transplantations were performed to 417 patients in Medicana International Ankara Hospital organ transplantation center.

Results

Of the patients, 231 were male, and 186 were female. Of the transplantations, 385 came from a living donor, and 32 came from a cadaver donor. The degree of kinship; 324 (77.7%) transplants were received from relatives, 5 (14.1%) with approval by the ethical committee, 32 (7.7%) from cadavers and two (0.5%) with cross-matching. Post-Operative Complications in recipients; lymphocele was found within the graft in two cases, urinary anastomosis leakage was detected in two cases, wound infection was detected in four cases, and hematoma in one case. We had no mortality in post operative or early follow up periods.

Conclusion

The morbidity and mortality rates in our organ transplantation center, regarding renal transplantations, are consistent with the literature.

Chylous Ascites and Lymphoceles: Evaluation and Interventions

Kinmonth introduced lymphangiography in 1955 and it became an important tool in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The technique, based on bipedal approach, was difficult and time-consuming which limited its use in clinical practice. Cope is the father of percutaneous lymphatic interventions and he was the first person to access and intervene on the lymphatic system. After his initial work published on 1999, there has been an expansion of the lymphatic embolization techniques, particularly since the development of intranodal lymphangiography and advance lymphatic imaging. This article is focused on the evaluation and management of postoperative chylous ascites and lymphoceles. Their incidence is growing due to longer survival of cancer patients and more radical surgical approaches, leading to an increased morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Minimally invasive percutaneous lymphatic embolization is becoming a first-line therapy in patients with postoperative lymphatic leakage.

Lymphatic vessels in solid organ transplantation and immunobiology

With the recent advances in our understanding of the function and biology of the lymphatic vascular system, it is clear that the lymphatic system plays an integral role in physiology, and in pathological settings, may contribute to either enhance or repress inflammation and disease progression. Inflammation is central to both acute and chronic rejection in the context of solid organ transplantation, and emerging evidence suggests the lymphatic system plays a key role in shaping outcomes. The goals of this review are to highlight and contextualize the roles of lymphatic vessels and lymphangiogenesis in immunobiology, the impact immunosuppressive therapies have on the lymphatic system and emerging evidence of organ-specific heterogeneity of lymphatic vessels in the context of solid organ transplantation.

Consensus on definition and severity grading of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation varies considerably in the literature. This is partly because a universally accepted definition has not been established. This study aimed to propose an acceptable definition and severity grading system for lymphatic complications based on their management strategy.

METHODS

Relevant literature published in MEDLINE and Web of Science was searched systematically. A consensus for definition and a severity grading was then sought between 20 high-volume transplant centres.

RESULTS

Lymphorrhoea/lymphocele was defined in 32 of 87 included studies. Sixty-three articles explained how lymphatic complications were managed, but none graded their severity. The proposed definition of lymphorrhoea was leakage of more than 50 ml fluid (not urine, blood or pus) per day from the drain, or the drain site after removal of the drain, for more than 1 week after kidney transplantation. The proposed definition of lymphocele was a fluid collection of any size near to the transplanted kidney, after urinoma, haematoma and abscess have been excluded. Grade A lymphatic complications have a minor and/or non-invasive impact on the clinical management of the patient; grade B complications require non-surgical intervention; and grade C complications require invasive surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

A clear definition and severity grading for lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation was agreed. The proposed definitions should allow better comparisons between studies.

Role of early povidone iodine instillation in post-renal transplant lymphorrhea: A prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the role of early povidone iodine instillation in the management of post-renal transplant lymphorrhea.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Live-related renal transplant recipients operated between January 2002 and December 2015 were included in the study. Significant lymphorrhea was defined as >50 mL lymph from drain beyond postoperative day 5. Such patients were randomized into two groups by simple randomization using a computer-generated random list: group A (received 0.5% povidone iodine instillation) and group B (no instillation). Absolute risk reduction and numbers needed to treat were calculated to estimate the effect of povidone iodine instillation for the treatment of lymphorrhea and decrease in the incidence of lymphocoele.

RESULTS

A total of 1766 patients underwent renal transplant during this period. One hundred seventeen patients with lymphorrhea through the drain underwent randomization into group A (n=61) and group B (n=56). In group A, 58 patients had successful resolution within 2 weeks, whereas in group B, 34 patients had successful resolution within 2 weeks. Overall, 9 (14.75%) patients in group A and 29 (51.78%) patients in group B had lymphatic collections (both symptomatic and asymptomatic). Symptomatic lymphocoele was present in 1 patient in group A and 7 patients in group B on follow-up. Absolute risk reduction was 10.8%, and for every symptomatic lymphocoele prevented, 10 patients needed povidone iodine instillation.

CONCLUSION

Povidone iodine instillation after 5 days of transplantation aids in the early resolution of post-renal transplantation lymphorrhea, as well as reduces the incidence of future lymphocoele.

Evaluation of the Renal Transplant Recipient in the Emergency Department

Renal transplants are becoming more and more frequent in the United States and worldwide. Studies demonstrate that these patients inevitably end up visiting an emergency department. In addition to typical medical and surgical problems encountered in the general population, this group of patients has unique problems arising from their immunocompromised state and also due to side effects of the medications required. This article discusses these risks and management decisions that the emergency department physician should be aware of in order to prevent adverse outcomes for the patient and transplanted kidney.

Predictors of symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation

Purpose

The development of a symptomatic lymphocele (SL) is a frequent postoperative surgical complication after kidney transplantation. It may lead to pain and discomfort and cause transplant malfunction or even secondary graft loss. A large cohort of renal recipients was investigated to identify the possible risk factors for SL.

Methods

All renal transplant patients of a single centre were retrospectively analysed for SL between January 2010 and December 2017. The SL group was compared to a control group from the same cohort.

Results

45 out of 1003 transplanted patients developed an SL (incidence 4.5%), on average 50 days after kidney transplantation. SLs developed more in older patients, in those with a PD catheter and in ADKDP as primary diagnosis. Surgical predictors for SLs were venous anastomosis on the external iliac vein, concomitant PD catheter removal, perfusion defects, shorter operating time, splint > 7 days, double J stenting, discharge with drain, low initial drain production and ureteral obstruction. Opening of the peritoneum, re-operation for postoperative bleeding and previous nephrectomy seem protective for developing SL.

Conclusion

We found multiple heterogeneous predictors for SL with a common denominator related to surgical management of the retroperitoneal space, peritoneum and the ureter. Future prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the influence of these variables on the development of SL.

Prophylactic Wound Drainage in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review

Background

Adult kidney transplantation is most commonly into an extraperitoneal potential space, and surgically placed drains are used routinely in many centers. There is limited evidence of clinical benefit for prophylactic drainage in other major abdominal and vascular surgery. Transplantation is, however, a unique setting combining organ dysfunction and immunosuppression, and the risks and benefits of prophylactic drain placement are not known. This study attempts to examine existing literature to determine whether prophylactic intraoperative drains have an impact on the likelihood of perigraft fluid collections and other wound-related complications following kidney transplantation.

Methods

A literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted to identify published comparative studies, including recipients receiving prophylactic drains to recipients in whom drains were omitted. The main outcomes were the incidence of peritransplant fluid collections and wound-related complications. Meta-analysis was performed on these data.

Results

Four retrospective cohort studies were deemed eligible for quantitative analysis and 1 additional conference abstract was included in qualitative discussion. A total of 1640 patients, 1023 with drains and 617 without, were included in the meta-analysis. There was a lower rate of peritransplant collections associated with the drain group (RR 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.90). There was no significant difference in the incidence of wound-related complications between the groups (RR 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-2.11).

Conclusions

These data associate a higher rate of peritransplant fluid collections with omission of prophylactic drainage, without a difference in the incidence of wound-related complications. Further research is required to definitively determine the impact of drains in this patient group.

Urologic Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Patients

Urologic causes of end-stage renal disease are estimated between 25% and 40% of causes. The goal of renal transplantation in chronic kidney disease patients is to provide renal replacement therapy with less morbidity, better quality of life, and improved overall survival compared with dialysis. A patient's urologic history can be a significant source of problems related to infections, recurrence of disease, and surgical complications. Many of the urologic risks are modifiable. Proper evaluation and management can mitigate the potential problems after transplantation, and these patients with complex urologic problems are seen to have similar graft function outcomes.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Transplantation: Update 2018

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) panel on renal transplantation (RT) has released an updated version of the RT guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To present the 2018 EAU guidelines on RT.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise was performed, encompassing all areas of RT guidelines published between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2016. Databases covered by the search included Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

It is strongly recommended to offer pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgery as the preferential technique for living donor nephrectomy. Decisions on the acceptance of a donor organ should not be based on histological findings alone since this might lead to an unnecessarily high rate of discarded grafts. For ureterovesical anastomosis, a Lich-Gregoir-like extravesical technique protected by a ureteral stent is the preferred technique for minimisation of urinary tract complications. It is also strongly recommended to perform initial rejection prophylaxis with a combination therapy comprising a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus), mycophenolate, steroids, and an induction agent (either basiliximab or anti-thymocyte globulin). The long version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website (http://uroweb.org/guidelines).

CONCLUSIONS

These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the clinical and surgical management of RT for incorporation into clinical practice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology has released the renal transplantation guidelines. The implementation of minimally invasive surgery for organ retrieval and the latest evidence on transplant surgery as well as on immunosuppressive regimens are key factors for minimisation of rejection and achievement of long-term graft survival.