Outcomes of preemptive kidney with or without subsequent pancreas transplant compared with preemptive simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant vs. pancreas after kidney transplantation: is one better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For those with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and renal failure, both simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) and pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplant can free the recipient of renal replacement and insulin therapies and provide survival advantage over ongoing dialysis and diabetes. Yet, pancreas transplants are notably declining in the United States, particularly for PAK.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreas transplant continues to provide better glycemic control than all present medical therapies. Outcomes for both SPK and PAK also continue to improve, and overall patient survival for both SPK and PAK are similar, excellent, and superior to all other transplant or medical options. SPK is associated with better pancreas allograft survival, but this gap is narrowing for PAK, and the best kidney allograft survival is achieved with living donor renal transplant (LDRTx) and PAK.

SUMMARY

PAK remains a viable and successful treatment for uremia and insulin dependent diabetes, and, particularly when following a LDRTx, can confer the additional benefits associated with LDRTx and preemptive transplant. To achieve insulin and dialysis independence, either LDRTx followed by PAK (if a living donor is available) or SPK should be offered to candidates with appropriate indications.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Outcomes of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants based on preemptive transplant compared to those who were on dialysis before transplant - a retrospective study

Among kidney transplant recipients, the duration of pretransplant dialysis is significantly associated with worse post-transplant outcomes. However, data on the outcomes of preemptive simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) are limited. We analyzed primary SPK recipients transplanted between January 2000 and December 2017. Patients were divided into two groups based on pretransplant dialysis history of preemptive versus non-preemptive. Patient and survival of grafts were outcomes of interest. Of the 644 recipients, 174 (27%) were preemptive and 470 (73%) were not. Most of the baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. In the univariable analysis, the non-preemptive transplant was associated with 54% increased risk for kidney death-censored graft failure (DCGF; HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01-2.35; P = 0.05). There was a 29% increased risk after adjustment for confounding factors (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.83-2.02; P = 0.26), although this association was not statistically significant. Similarly, there was a 16% increased risk of pancreas DCGF in univariable analysis and 1% after adjustment, which was also not statistically significant. When outcomes were based on the duration of pretransplant dialysis, the duration was not associated with either patient survival or survival of either graft in K-M analysis. In SPK recipients, with pretransplant dialysis history, there was a tendency toward inferior graft survival, mainly for the kidney more than the pancreas.

Influence of Peritoneal or Hemodialysis on Results of Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

The influence of peritoneal dialysis on outcomes after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant is still vague. In addition, whether peritoneal dialysis leads to a higher risk of infectious complications and higher mortality rates in these transplant patients has not been unambiguously confirmed. In this study, our aim was to verify whether dialysis type determined outcomes on the pancreas graft and whether dialysis type was a risk factor for graftectomy or recipient death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study group included 44 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant patients. Analyzed parameters included type and duration of dialysis treatment, age, sex, long-term pancreas graft survival and patient survival, overall mortality, and number of graftectomies.

RESULTS

Of 44 patients, 3 (7%) required a graftectomy. Mortality rate of the group was 5%. Of 44 patients, 33 had hemodialysis and 11 had peritoneal dialysis. In those who had hemodialysis, the mean duration of renal replacement therapy was 30.5 months, which was significantly longer than duration for those who had peritoneal dialysis (20.4 mo; P < .01). There were 3 graftectomies and 1 death in the hemodialysis group. In the peritoneal dialysis group, there were no graftectomies and 1 death, with no significant differences in the number of graftectomies and mortality rates between the groups. Long-term survival also did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that type of dialysis did not affect outcomes in our group of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant patients. Before transplant, each patient requires an individual approach to treatment. The type of dialysis performed should not be viewed as a contradiction for transplant.

Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Versus Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Alone: an Outcome-Driven Choice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The choice of optimum transplant in a patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and chronic kidney disease stage V (CKD V) is not clear. The purpose of this review was to investigate this in more detail-in particular the choice between a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), including recent evidence, to aid clinicians and their patients in making an informed choice in their care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Analyses of large databases have recently shown SPKT to have better survival rates than a LDKT in the long-term, despite an early increase in morbidity and mortality in SPKT recipients. This survival advantage has only been shown in those SPKT recipients with a functioning pancreas and not those who had early pancreas graft loss. The choice of SPKT or LDKT should not be based on patient and graft survival outcomes alone. Individual patient circumstances, preferences, and comorbidities, among other factors should form an important part of the decision-making process. In general, an SPKT should be considered in those patients not on dialysis and LDKT in those nearing or already on dialysis.

[Transplantation strategy in type 1 diabetic patients]

Beta cell replacement by pancreas or Langerhans islets transplantation is the only way to restore glucose homeostasis in type 1 diabetic patients. The counterpart is the need for long-term immunosuppression. These transplantations are therefore mainly indicated for patients candidates for kidney transplantation and for patients with poor quality of life due to unstable diabetes with life-threatening hypoglycemic events. Both beta cell replacement techniques have different benefits and risks and should be adapted to each type 1 diabetic patient. The transplant strategy must be personalized according to parameters assessed in the pre-transplant period, validated by a multidisciplinary team and reassessed regularly until transplantation.

Pre-emptive Intestinal Transplant: The Surgeon's Point of View

Pre-emptive transplantation is a well-established practice for certain types of end-organ failure such as in the use of kidney transplantation. For irreversible intestinal failure, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) remains the gold standard, due to the suboptimal long-term results of intestinal transplantation. As such, the only role for pre-emptive transplantation, if at all, will be for patients identified to be at high risk of complications and mortality while on definitive long-term TPN. In these patients, the timing of early listing and transplantation could become life-saving, taking into account that mortality on the waiting list is still the highest for intestinal candidates. The development of simulation models or pre-transplant scoring systems could help in selecting patients based on potential outcome on TPN or with transplantation, and recent reports from high-volume centers identify few underlying pathologic conditions and some TPN complications as at higher risk of increased morbidity and mortality. A pre-emptive transplant could be used as a rehabilitative procedure in a well-selected case-by-case scenario, among TPN patients at risk of liver failure, repeated central line infections, mesenteric infarction, short bowel syndrome (SBS) <50 cm or with end stoma, congenital mucosal disease, desmoid tumors: These conditions must be carefully evaluated, not to underestimate the clinical stage nor to over-estimate the impact of a temporary situation. At the present time, diseases with a variable and unpredictable course, such as intestinal dysmotility disorders, or quality of life and financial issues are still far from being considered as indications for a pre-emptive transplant.

Live donor kidney - PAK versus SPK: how to decide?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with type 1 diabetes and end stage renal disease face a complex choice when considering the relative risks and benefits of kidney transplant alone with or without subsequent pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK) or simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant (SPK).

RECENT FINDINGS

SPK is considered the optimal treatment regarding long-term patient survival, but when also faced with the option of living donor kidney transplant with the potential for PAK later, the ideal option is less clear.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the current literature regarding SPK, living donor kidney transplant alone, and PAK transplant outcomes and examines the relative risks of pre- and posttransplant variables that impact patient and graft survival to help inform this complex treatment decision.

Multiorgan transplantation

Kidney transplantation has proven to be the gold standard therapy for severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to multiple etiologies in individuals deemed eligible from a surgical standpoint. While kidney transplantation is traditionally considered in conditions of native kidney disease such as diabetes and immunological or inherited causes of kidney disease, an increasing indication for kidney transplantation is kidney dysfunction in the setting of other severe organ dysfunction that requires transplant, such as severe liver or heart disease. In these settings, multiorgan transplantation is now commonly performed, with controversy regarding the appropriate utilization of kidneys transplanted both from a physiological perspective (distinguishing those who require a kidney transplant) and also from an ethical perspective (allocation of a scarce resource to a more morbid population). These issues persist in the setting of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), in which utilization for patients with type 1 diabetes has been historically accepted. Questions of physiological benefit persist, and utilization is waning despite broader allocation policies that encourage SPK, including consideration for patients with type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this review will be to summarize the physiological data regarding multiorgan transplantation and place these into context while reviewing current allocation policy in the United States.

Kidney Transplantation in the Diabetic Patient

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most important causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease, kidney transplantation (KT) with or without a pancreas transplant is the treatment of choice. We aimed to review current data regarding kidney and pancreas transplant options in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes and the outcomes of different treatment modalities. In general, pancreas transplantation is associated with long-term survival advantages despite an increased short-term morbidity and mortality risk. This applies to simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation or pancreas after KT compared to KT alone (either living donor or deceased). Other factors as living donor availability, comorbidities, and expected waiting time have to be considered whens electing one transplant modality, rather than a clear benefit in survival of one strategy vs. others. In selected type 2 diabetic patients, data support cautious utilization of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation when a living kidney donor is not an option. Pancreas and kidney transplantation seems to be the treatment of choice for most type 1 diabetic and selected type 2 diabetic patients.

Kidney transplant options for the diabetic patient

For patients with diabetes and progressive chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is the optimal mode of renal replacement therapy, with or without a pancreas transplant. Additional benefits of pancreas transplant have become increasingly apparent due to advances in surgical outcomes and immunosuppression, and may be reasonably considered even in selected patients with type 2 diabetes. In general, pancreas transplantation is associated with long-term survival advantages despite an increased short-term morbidity and mortality risk. This is true with simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation or pancreas after kidney transplantation compared to kidney transplantation alone, regardless of kidney donor status (living or deceased). Individual patient preferences, comorbidities, and expected waiting time influence selection of transplant modality, rather than a clear survival benefit of one strategy versus the other. In selected patients with type 2 diabetes, recent outcomes data support cautious utilization of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation when a living kidney donor transplant is not an option. The purpose of this review is to summarize current data regarding kidney and pancreas transplant treatment options in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes and the influence of current organ allocation policies to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of each of these strategies.

Improved patient survival with simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation in recipients with diabetic end-stage renal disease

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to determine whether simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation would improve patient and kidney graft survival in diabetic end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with kidney transplantation alone (KTA).

METHODS

Follow-up data were retrieved for all 630 patients with diabetic ESRD who had received SPK or KTA at our centre from 1983 to the end of 2010. Recipients younger than 55 years of age received either an SPK (n = 222) or, if available, a single live donor kidney (LDK; n = 171). Older recipients and recipients with greater comorbidity received a single deceased donor kidney (DDK; n = 237). Survival was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and in multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for recipient and donor characteristics.

RESULTS

Patient survival was superior in SPK compared with both LDK and DDK recipients in univariate analysis. Follow-up time (mean ± SD) after transplantation was 7.1 ± 5.7 years. Median actuarial patient survival was 14.0 years for SPK, 11.5 years for LDK and 6.7 years for DDK recipients. In multivariate analyses including recipient age, sex, treatment modality, time on dialysis and era, SPK transplantation was protective for all-cause mortality compared with both LDK (p = 0.02) and DDK (p = 0.029) transplantation. After the year 2000, overall patient survival improved compared with previous years (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30, 0.55; p < 0.001). Pancreas graft survival also improved after 2000, with a 5 year graft survival rate of 78% vs 61% in previous years (1988-1999).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Recipients of SPK transplants have superior patient survival compared with both LDK and DDK recipients, with improved results seen over the last decade.

Follow-up of secondary diabetic complications after pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Successful pancreas transplantation restores physiologic glycemic and metabolic control. Its effects on overall patient survival (especially for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation) are clear-cut. We herein review the available literature to define the impact of pancreas transplantation on chronic complications of diabetes mellitus.

RECENT FINDINGS

With longer-term follow-up, wider patient populations, and more accurate investigational tools (clinical and functional tests, noninvasive imaging, histology, and molecular biology), growing data show that successful pancreas transplantation may slow the progression, stabilize, and even favor the regression of secondary complications of diabetes, both microvascular and macrovascular, in a relevant proportion of recipients.

SUMMARY

Patients who are referred for pancreas transplantation usually suffer from advanced chronic complications of diabetes, which have classically been deemed irreversible. A successful pancreas transplantation is often able to slow the progression, stabilize, and even reverse many microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Growing clinical evidence shows that the expected natural history of long-term diabetic complications can be significantly modified by successful pancreas transplantation.