Effects of antibody induction on transplant outcomes in human leukocyte antigen zero-mismatch deceased donor kidney recipients

Immunologic Benefits of 0-antigen Mismatched Transplants: No Added Boost for Racial and Ethnic Minorities

Background

Systemic barriers to posttransplant care, including access to immunosuppressant medications, contribute to higher rates of kidney transplant failure in racial minorities. Matching donor and recipient HLA alleles reduce allorecognition, easing reliance on immunosuppression. We hypothesize that 0-antigen mismatch transplants may provide stronger protection against graft loss in racial minorities.

Methods

We compared adult, single-organ, deceased-donor kidney transplants in the United States from 2007 to 2016 by degree of HLA mismatch (0- versus ≥1-antigen mismatch). We examined time-to-allograft failure, with death as a competing event, using multivariable Weibull models, stratified by recipient race (White versus non-White), and evaluated the interaction between mismatch and recipient race. We used Kaplan-Meier imputation to account for competing risk of death.

Results

We analyzed 102 114 transplants (median follow-up, 5.6 y; 16 862 graft losses, 18 994 deaths). Zero-antigen mismatch was associated with improved allograft survival (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.85). When stratified by recipient race, the effect of 0-antigen mismatch was more pronounced in White (unadjusted sHR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83) versus non-White recipients (sHR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; interaction P = 0.04). The differential effect was attenuated after adjusting for covariates (sHR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84 versus sHR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; interaction P = 0.10).

Conclusions

Zero-antigen mismatch transplants conferred a 20% risk reduction in allograft loss, which was similar between non-White and White recipients. This may reflect an increased degree of mismatch at other HLA alleles and non-HLA alleles in non-White recipients or because of the extent of systemic barriers to healthcare borne by minority recipients.

Second Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Dialysis Dependent Recipients by Induction Type in the United States

BACKGROUND

We examined the association between induction type for a second kidney transplant in dialysis-dependent recipients and the long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all second kidney transplant recipients who returned to dialysis before re-transplantation. Exclusion criteria included: missing, unusual, or no-induction regimens, maintenance regimens other than tacrolimus and mycophenolate, and positive crossmatch status. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: the anti-thymocyte group (N = 9899), the alemtuzumab group (N = 1982), and the interleukin 2 receptor antagonist group (N = 1904). We analyzed recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) using the Kaplan-Meier survival function with follow-up censored at 10 years post-transplant. We used Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between induction and the outcomes of interest. To account for the center-specific effect, we included the center as a random effect. We adjusted the models for the pertinent recipient and organ variables.

RESULTS

In the Kaplan-Meier analyses, induction type did not alter recipient survival (log-rank P = .419) or DCGS (log-rank P = .146). Similarly, in the adjusted models, induction type was not a predictor of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys were associated with better recipient survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI [0.65, 0.83], P < .001) and graft survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI [0.64, 0.82], P < .001). Publicly insured recipients had worse recipient and allograft outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of average immunologic-risk dialysis-dependent second kidney transplant recipients, who were discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance, induction type did not influence the long-term outcomes of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys improved recipient and graft survival.

Efficacy and safety of antibody induction therapy in the current era of kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibody induction with polyclonal rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) is widely used in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Collaborative Transplant Study data from 38 311 first deceased-donor kidney transplants (2004-13) were analysed. Transplants were classified as 'normal risk' or 'increased risk' according to current guidelines. Cox regression analysis was applied to subpopulations of propensity score-matched recipients.

RESULTS

rATG or IL-2RA induction was given to 64% of increased-risk and 53% of normal-risk patients, respectively. rATG and IL-2RA induction were each associated with reduced risk for graft loss versus no induction in increased-risk patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, P = 0.046 and HR 0.89, P = 0.011, respectively]. The HR values for incidence of treated rejection in increased-risk patients for rATG and IL-2RA versus no induction were 0.75 (P = 0.037) and 0.77 (P < 0.001), respectively. In the normal risk subpopulation, neither induction therapy significantly affected the risk of graft loss or treated rejection. Hospitalization for infection was increased by rATG (P < 0.001) and IL-2RA (P < 0.001) induction. In contrast to patients transplanted during 1994-2003, among patients transplanted during 2004-13, rATG did not significantly affect the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma versus no induction (P = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Induction therapy following kidney transplantation should be targeted to increased-risk transplants. In this analysis, a beneficial effect of antibody induction in normal-risk transplants could not be demonstrated.

Immunological risk assessment: The key to individualized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation

The wide range of immunosuppressive therapies and protocols permits tailored planning of the initial regimen according to the immunological risk status of individual patients. Pre-transplant risk assessment can include many factors, but there is no clear consensus on which parameters to take into account, and their relative importance. In general younger patients are known to be at higher risk for acute rejection, compounded by higher rates of non-adherence in adolescents. Donor age and recipient gender do not appear to exert a meaningful effect on risk of rejection per se, but black recipient ethnicity remains a well-established risk factor even under modern immunosuppression regimens. Little difference in risk is now observed between deceased- and living-donor recipients. Immunological risk assessment has developed substantially in recent years. Cross-match testing with cytotoxic analysis has long been supplemented by flow cytometry, but development of solid-phase single-bead antigen testing of solubilized human leukocyte antigens (HLA) to detect donor-specific antibodies (DSA) permits a far more nuanced stratification of immunological risk status, including the different classes and intensities of HLA antibodies Class I and/or II, including HLA-DSA. Immunologic risk evaluation is now often based on a combination of these tests, but other assessments are becoming more widely introduced, such as measurement of non-HLA antibodies against angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors or T-cell ELISPOT assay of alloantigen-specific donor. Targeted densensitization protocols can improve immunological risk, notably for DSA-positive patients with negative cytotoxicity and flow cross-match. HLA mismatch remains an important and undisputed risk factor for rejection. Delayed graft function also increases the risk of subsequent acute rejection, and the early regimen can be modified in such cases. Overall, there is a shift towards planning the immunosuppressive regimen based on pre-transplant immunology testing although certain conventional risk factors retain their importance.

Rethinking the advantage of zero-HLA mismatches in unrelated living donor kidney transplantation: implications on kidney paired donation

The OPTN/UNOS Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Pilot Program allocates priority to zero-HLA mismatches. However, in unrelated living donor kidney transplants (LDKT)-the same donor source in KPD-no study has shown whether zero-HLA mismatches provide any advantage over >0 HLA mismatches. We hypothesize that zero-HLA mismatches among unrelated LDKT do not benefit graft survival. This retrospective SRTR database study analyzed LDKT recipients from 1987 to 2012. Among unrelated LDKT, subjects with zero-HLA mismatches were compared to a 1:1-5 matched (by donor age ±1 year and year of transplantation) control cohort with >0 HLA mismatches. The primary endpoint was death-censored graft survival. Among 32,654 unrelated LDKT recipients, 83 had zero-HLA mismatches and were matched to 407 controls with >0 HLA mismatches. Kaplan-Meier analyses for death-censored graft and patient survival showed no difference between study and control cohorts. In multivariate marginal Cox models, zero-HLA mismatches saw no benefit with death-censored graft survival (HR = 1.46, 95% CI 0.78-2.73) or patient survival (HR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.68-3.01). Our data suggest that in unrelated LDKT, zero-HLA mismatches may not offer any survival advantage. Therefore, particular study of zero-HLA mismatching is needed to validate its place in the OPTN/UNOS KPD Pilot Program allocation algorithm.

New directions for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin(®)) in solid organ transplants, stem cell transplants and autoimmunity

In the 30 years since the rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) Thymoglobulin^® was first licensed, its use in solid organ transplantation and hematology has expanded progressively. Although the evidence base is incomplete, specific roles for rATG in organ transplant recipients using contemporary dosing strategies are now relatively well-identified. The addition of rATG induction to a standard triple or dual regimen reduces acute cellular rejection, and possibly humoral rejection. It is an appropriate first choice in patients with moderate or high immunological risk, and may be used in low-risk patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing regimen from time of transplant, or if early steroid withdrawal is planned. Kidney transplant patients at risk of delayed graft function may also benefit from the use of rATG to facilitate delayed CNI introduction. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, rATG has become an important component of conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens, following demonstration of reduced acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. More recently, a role for rATG has also been established in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. In autoimmunity, rATG contributes to the treatment of severe aplastic anemia, and has been incorporated in autograft projects for the management of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease, and systemic sclerosis. Finally, research is underway for the induction of tolerance exploiting the ability of rATG to induce immunosuppresive cells such as regulatory T-cells. Despite its long history, rATG remains a key component of the immunosuppressive armamentarium, and its complex immunological properties indicate that its use will expand to a wider range of disease conditions in the future.

Monitoring of CD3(+) T-cell count in patients receiving antithymocyte globulin induction after cadaveric renal transplantation

AIM

Although antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has been used for years, its ideal dose and administration period is obscure. Herein, we sought to use the CD3(+) cell count to detect the optimal ATG dosage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients who underwent cadaveric donor renal transplantation from January 2009 to January 2012 received a 1 mg/kg ATG initial dose at the time of the operation. Patients were randomized into 2 cohorts. Group 1 (n = 11) received ATG according to the clinical and total lymphocyte count and group 2 (n = 10), the dose was tailored according to the CD3(+) cell count. We compared the total and daily ATG dosages, ATG administration period, side effects of ATG, the number of days to a serum creatinine level <2 mg/dL, graft function at 3 months, acute rejection episodes, infection rates, costs of CD3(+) analysis, and ATG amounts.

RESULTS

Both groups showed similar gender, age, and human leukocyte antigen matching data. There was no difference in presensitizing events or panel-reactive antibody class 1 and 2 levels. The number of days to a serum creatinine level of <2 mg/dL was 11 ± 1.5 for group 1 versus 10.4 ± 0.8 for group 2 (P = .45). Between groups 1 and 2, there was a significant difference between the mean total (P = .031) and mean daily ATG dosages (P = .006). We used a total dose of 3800 mg ATG for group 1 and 2200 mg for group 2 and for the group 2 who underwent 43 CD3(+) cell counts. The expenditure per patient was 20% higher among group 1 than group 2.

CONCLUSION

Determination of appropriate ATG dosages by CD3(+) cell counts was useful, reliable, and cost effective.

Selection of induction therapy in kidney transplantation

Currently available immunosuppressive agents can be classified into three categories: induction agents, maintenance therapy, and treatment for rejection. This review article will focus on induction immunosuppression. There are three antibodies which are used for induction therapy: the lymphocyte-depleting agents - anti-thymocyte globulin and alemtuzumab, and basiliximab which is nondepleting. Historically, immunosuppressant selection was solely based on efficacy for prevention of rejection. In the current era of transplantation, it is now common practice in the transplant community to select induction therapy on the basis of risk-benefit considerations for each patient. This article will focus on the efficacy of available induction agents and the selection of induction agent based on donor and recipient risk factors.