1
|
Watt KD, Rolak S, Foley DP, Plichta JK, Pruthi S, Farr D, Zwald FO, Carvajal RD, Dudek AZ, Sanger CB, Rocco R, Chang GJ, Dizon DS, Langstraat CL, Teoh D, Agarwal PK, Al-Qaoud T, Eggener S, Kennedy CC, D'Cunha J, Mohindra NA, Stewart S, Habermann TH, Schuster S, Lunning M, Shah NN, Gertz MA, Mehta J, Suvannasankha A, Verna E, Farr M, Blosser CD, Hammel L, Al-Adra DP. Cancer Surveillance in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With a Pretransplant History of Malignancy: Multidisciplinary Collaborative Expert Opinion. Transplantation 2024; 108:2336-2350. [PMID: 38771067 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
With improved medical treatments, the prognosis for many malignancies has improved, and more patients are presenting for transplant evaluation with a history of treated cancer. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with a prior malignancy are at higher risk of posttransplant recurrence or de novo malignancy, and they may require a cancer surveillance program that is individualized to their specific needs. There is a dearth of literature on optimal surveillance strategies specific to SOT recipients. A working group of transplant physicians and cancer-specific specialists met to provide expert opinion recommendations on optimal cancer surveillance after transplantation for patients with a history of malignancy. Surveillance strategies provided are mainly based on general population recurrence risk data, immunosuppression effects, and limited transplant-specific data and should be considered expert opinion based on current knowledge. Prospective studies of cancer-specific surveillance models in SOT recipients should be supported to inform posttransplant management of this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stacey Rolak
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David P Foley
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | | | - Deborah Farr
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Fiona O Zwald
- Department of Dermatology, Colorado University School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Richard D Carvajal
- Department of Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, NY
| | | | - Cristina B Sanger
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
- Department of Surgery, William S.Middleton Memorial Veteran's Hospital, Madison, WI
| | - Ricciardi Rocco
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Don S Dizon
- Department of Medicine, Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | - Deanna Teoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Piyush K Agarwal
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Talal Al-Qaoud
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC
| | - Scott Eggener
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Nisha A Mohindra
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Shelby Stewart
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Stephen Schuster
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Program, Abraham Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Matthew Lunning
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Nirav N Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | - Jayesh Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Attaya Suvannasankha
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Maryjane Farr
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Christopher D Blosser
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle WA
| | - Laura Hammel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meuleman MS, Mouyabi S, Gueguen J, Vicca S, Divard G, Aubert O, Bienaimé F, Arnulf B, Anglicheau D, Bridoux F, Cohen C. Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance in kidney transplanted patients: novel insights into long-term outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023; 39:64-73. [PMID: 37403344 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of increased access to kidney transplantation in elderly subjects, the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance (MGUS) in kidney transplantation (KT) is growing. However, little is known about the consequences of MGUS on long-term outcomes. METHODS We identified 70 recipients with MGUS present at transplantation (KTMG) and 114 patients with MGUS occurring after KT (DNMG), among 3059 patients who underwent a KT in two French kidney transplantation centers. We compared outcomes of KTMG with those of matched controls. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar except for an older age in KTMG compared with the DNMG group (62 vs 57 years, P = .03). Transient MGUS occurred more frequently in DNMG patients (45% vs 24%, P = .007). When compared with matched controls without MGUS, KTMG patients showed higher frequency and earlier post-transplant solid cancers (15% vs 5%, P = .04) and a trend for more bacterial infections (63% vs 48%, P = .08), without difference regarding patient and graft survival, rejection episodes or hematological complications. KTMG patients with an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio and/or severe hypogammaglobulinemia at the time of KT experienced shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS MGUS detection at the time of KT is neither associated with a higher occurrence of graft rejection, nor adversely affects graft or overall survival. MGUS should not contraindicate KT. However, MGUS at the time of KT may be associated with higher risk of early neoplastic and infectious complications and warrants prolonged surveillance. Measurement of serum free light chain should be performed before transplant to refine the risk evaluation of KTMG patients and propose personalized follow-up and immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Sophie Meuleman
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, APHP. Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Steven Mouyabi
- Department of Nephrology, CHU Poitiers, Vienne, France. Centre de référence « Amylose AL et autres maladies à dépôts d'immunoglobuline monoclonales»
| | | | - Stéphanie Vicca
- Biochemistry Laboratory, Hôpital Necker, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Gillian Divard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, APHP. Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, APHP. Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Frank Bienaimé
- Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles rénales, Hôpital Necker, APHP. Université de, Paris, France
- Institut Necker Enfant Malade, INSERMU1151, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Arnulf
- Hematology and Oncology, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, France. Université de Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, APHP. Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Frank Bridoux
- Department of Nephrology, CHU Poitiers, Vienne, France. Centre de référence « Amylose AL et autres maladies à dépôts d'immunoglobuline monoclonales»
| | - Camille Cohen
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, APHP. Université de Paris Cité, France
- Stress and cancer laboratory, INSERM U830, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El-Khoury H, Lee DJ, Alberge JB, Redd R, Cea-Curry CJ, Perry J, Barr H, Murphy C, Sakrikar D, Barnidge D, Bustoros M, Leblebjian H, Cowan A, Davis MI, Amstutz J, Boehner CJ, Lightbody ED, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Perkins MC, Harding S, Mo CC, Kapoor P, Mikhael J, Borrello IM, Fonseca R, Weiss ST, Karlson E, Trippa L, Rebbeck TR, Getz G, Marinac CR, Ghobrial IM. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies and clinical outcomes in a high-risk US population screened by mass spectrometry: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9:e340-e349. [PMID: 35344689 PMCID: PMC9067621 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00069-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevalence estimates for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are based on predominantly White study populations screened by serum protein electrophoresis supplemented with immunofixation electrophoresis. A prevalence of 3% is reported for MGUS in the general population of European ancestry aged 50 years or older. MGUS prevalence is two times higher in individuals of African descent or with a family history of conditions related to multiple myeloma. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical implications of monoclonal gammopathies in a high-risk US population screened by quantitative mass spectrometry. METHODS We used quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and EXENT-iQ software to screen for and quantify monoclonal gammopathies in serum from 7622 individuals who consented to the PROMISE screening study between Feb 26, 2019, and Nov 4, 2021, and the Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB) between July 28, 2010, and July 1, 2021. M-protein concentrations at the monoclonal gammopathy of indeterminate potential (MGIP) level were confirmed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry testing. 6305 (83%; 2211 from PROMISE, 4094 from MGBB) of 7622 participants in the cohorts were at high risk for developing a monoclonal gammopathy on the basis of Black race or a family history of haematological malignancies and fell within the eligible high-risk age range (30 years or older for PROMISE cohort and 18 years or older for MGBB cohort); those over 18 years were also eligible if they had two or more family members with a blood cancer (PROMISE cohort). Participants with a plasma cell malignancy diagnosed before screening were excluded. Longitudinal clinical data were available for MGBB participants with a median follow-up time from serum sample screening of 4·5 years (IQR 2·4-6·7). The PROMISE study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689595. FINDINGS The median age at time of screening was 56·0 years (IQR 46·8-64·1). 5013 (66%) of 7622 participants were female, 2570 (34%) male, and 39 (<1%) unknown. 2439 (32%) self-identified as Black, 4986 (65%) as White, 119 (2%) as other, and 78 (1%) unknown. Using serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation electrophoresis, the MGUS prevalence was 6% (101 of 1714) in high-risk individuals aged 50 years or older. Using mass spectrometry, we observed a total prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies of 43% (1788 of 4207) in this group. We termed monoclonal gammopathies below the clinical immunofixation electrophoresis detection level (<0·2 g/L) MGIPs, to differentiate them from those with higher concentrations, termed mass-spectrometry MGUS, which had a 13% (592 of 4207) prevalence by mass spectrometry in high-risk individuals aged 50 years or older. MGIP was predominantly of immunoglobulin M isotype, and its prevalence increased with age (19% [488 of 2564] for individuals aged <50 years, 29% [1464 of 5058] for those aged ≥50 years, and 37% [347 of 946] for those aged ≥70 years). Mass-spectrometry MGUS prevalence increased with age (5% [127 of 2564] for individuals aged <50 years, 13% [678 of 5058] for those aged ≥50 years, and 18% [173 of 946] for those aged ≥70 years) and was higher in men (314 [12%] of 2570) compared with women (485 [10%] 5013; p=0·0002), whereas MGIP prevalence did not differ significantly by gender. In those aged 50 years or older, the prevalence of mass spectrometry was significantly higher in Black participants (224 [17%] of 1356) compared with the controls (p=0·0012) but not in those with family history (368 [13%] of 2851) compared with the controls (p=0·1008). Screen-detected monoclonal gammopathies correlated with increased all-cause mortality in MGBB participants (hazard ratio 1·55, 95% CI 1·16-2·08; p=0·0035). All monoclonal gammopathies were associated with an increased likelihood of comorbidities, including myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1·60, 95% CI 1·26-2·02; p=0·00016 for MGIP-high and 1·39, 1·07-1·80; p=0·015 for mass-spectrometry MGUS). INTERPRETATION We detected a high prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies, including age-associated MGIP, and made more precise estimates of mass-spectrometry MGUS compared with conventional gel-based methods. The use of mass spectrometry also highlighted the potential hidden clinical significance of MGIP. Our study suggests the association of monoclonal gammopathies with a variety of clinical phenotypes and decreased overall survival. FUNDING Stand Up To Cancer Dream Team, the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, and National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Habib El-Khoury
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David J Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jean-Baptiste Alberge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Robert Redd
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian J Cea-Curry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacqueline Perry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hadley Barr
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ciara Murphy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Mark Bustoros
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Houry Leblebjian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pharmacy, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna Cowan
- Alix School of Medicine, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Maya I Davis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julia Amstutz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cody J Boehner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Lightbody
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Clifton C Mo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Joseph Mikhael
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA; International Myeloma Foundation, North Hollywood, CA, USA
| | - Ivan M Borrello
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rafael Fonseca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Scott T Weiss
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Karlson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- The Center for Prevention of Progression of Blood Cancer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gad Getz
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Catherine R Marinac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; The Center for Prevention of Progression of Blood Cancer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Irene M Ghobrial
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; The Center for Prevention of Progression of Blood Cancer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|