Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Informed Consent and Decision Making About Accepting KDPI > 85 Kidneys

The Use of Kidneys With Lower Longevity From Deceased Donors to Improve Access to Preemptive Renal Transplantation for Elderly Patients: A Qualitative Study

Background

There is a gap between the number of patients waiting for a transplant and the number of kidneys available. Some deceased donor kidneys are currently nonutilized, as medical teams fear that they will experience suboptimal graft survival. However, these organs could provide an acceptable therapeutic option if they were allocated for preemptive kidney transplantation in elderly candidates.

Objective

This project aims to gather patients' perspectives on the allocation of kidneys with lower longevity for preemptive kidney transplantation in elderly patients.

Design

Individual interviews.

Setting

The Center hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinic.

Participants

Patients aged between 64 and 75 years with CKD G4-5 ND, followed at the CHUM and who have not initiated dialysis yet.

Methods

Between March and July 2023, we conducted 14 individual interviews with patients aged between 64 and 75 years who had CKD G4-5 ND and were followed at the CHUM. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted.

Results

Most participants were in favor of using kidneys with lower longevity to increase their access to transplantation, improve their quality of life, enable accelerated transplantation, and avoid dialysis. Patients also wanted to be engaged in the decision-making process, underlining the importance of informed consent. Although the use of kidneys with lower longevity offers the hope of returning to "normal" life, some patients were concerned about the risk of reduced graft survival and the need for a subsequent kidney transplant. In these cases, patients were interested in using mitigation strategies, such as prioritization for kidney transplantation from standard donors in case of early graft loss associated with receiving kidneys with lower longevity. They also recommended the development of a separate waiting list for patients consenting to preemptive transplantation with kidneys with lower longevity.

Limitations

This study was conducted in only 1 nephrology clinic in the province of Quebec with French-speaking patients. Consequently, the results may not be generalizable to other populations, including ethnic minorities.

Conclusion

The use of kidneys with lower longevity for preemptive kidney transplantation appears to be an interesting option for elderly kidney transplant candidates. However, patient information and participation in the decision-making process are essential. Moreover, organ donation organizations and transplant programs should develop a separate waitlist for transplant candidates who have preconsented to receive organ offers of deceased donor kidneys with lower longevity.

Trial registration

Not registered.

Quantifying the Effect of Consent for High-Kidney Donor Profile Index Deceased Donor Transplants in the United States

Key Points

Nationally, 41% of kidney transplant candidates consented to receive high–Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) donor offers in the United States. There was wide variation in consent proportion for high-KDPI donors on the basis of individual characteristics and transplant centers. Consent for high-KDPI kidneys was associated with 15% higher adjusted rates of deceased donor transplantation.

Background

Despite known benefits of kidney transplantation, including transplantation from donors with increased risk factors, many waitlisted candidates die before transplantation. Consent to receive donor kidneys with lower expected survival (e.g ., Kidney Donor Profile Index [KDPI] >85%) is typically obtained at waitlist placement. The presumed benefit of consent to receive high-KDPI donor kidneys is higher likelihood and timeliness of donor offers for transplantation. However, the specific effect of consent on access to transplantation is unclear. Our aims were to evaluate the characteristics of candidates consenting to high-KDPI donor kidneys and the likelihood of receiving a deceased donor transplant over time on the basis of consent.

Methods

We used national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data between 2015 and 2022 (n =213,364). We evaluated the likelihood of consent using multivariable logistic models and time to deceased donor transplant with cumulative incidence plots accounting for competing risks and multivariable Cox models.

Results

Overall, high-KDPI consent was 41%, which was higher among candidates who were older, were Black or Hispanic, had higher body mass index, had diabetes, had vascular disease, and had 12–48 months prelisting dialysis time, with significant center-level variation. High-KDPI consent was associated with higher rates of deceased donor transplant (adjusted hazard ratio=1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.17) with no difference in likelihood of deceased donor transplant from donors with KDPI <85%. The effect of high-KDPI consent on higher rates of deceased donor transplantation was higher among candidates older than 60 years and candidates with diabetes and variable on the basis of center characteristics.

Conclusions

There is significant variation of consent for high-KDPI donor kidneys and higher likelihood of transplantation associated with consent.

Can We Predict Kidney Graft Function and Graft Survival Using Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Parameters From Donors After Circulatory Death?

Background

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) reduces renal injury in donation after circulatory death donors with a high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). This study aims to characterize the correlation between KDPI, HMP parameters, and donor vitals during the withdrawal period in predicting short- and long-term graft outcomes.

Methods

ANOVA with Tukey's honestly significant difference tests compared the relationship between average flow, average resistance, peak resistance, flow slope, and resistance slope on day 30, 1-y, and 3-y eGFR, and days of delayed graft function. Graft and recipient survival rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

The data for 72 grafts were suitable for analysis. Kidneys with KDPI >50% had a significantly higher day 30, and 1-y posttransplant eGFR, if HMP average flow was >150 mL/min, or the average resistance was <0.15 mm Hg/mL/min, compared with kidneys with also KDPI >50% but had not achieved the same pump parameters. There were no significant differences in the Kaplan-Meier analysis, considering recipient or graft survival, regardless of the KPDI score with 3- or 5-y outcomes.

Conclusions

Use of average resistance and average flow from a HMP, in conjunction with KDPI, may be predictive of the short- and long-term function of donation after circulatory death kidney transplants.

Kidney organ allocation: reducing discards

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The donation and kidney transplant system in the United States is challenged with reducing the number of kidneys that are procured for transplant but ultimately discarded. That number can reach 20% of donated kidneys each year.

RECENT FINDINGS

The reasons for these discards, in the face of overwhelming demand, are multiple.

SUMMARY

The authors review the data supporting a number of potential causes for high discard rates as well as provide potential solutions to the problem.

Deceased donor kidneys are discarded at higher rates when labeled as high kidney donor profile index

The kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and percentile conversion, kidney donor profile index (KDPI), provide a continuous measure of donor quality. Kidneys with a KDPI >85% (KDPI₈₅ ) are referred to as "high KDPI." The KDPI₈₅ cutoff changes every year, impacting which kidneys are labeled as KDPI_HIGH . We examine kidney utilization around the KDPI₈₅ cutoff and explore the "high KDPI" labeling effect. KDRI to KDPI Mapping Tables from 2012 to 2020 were used to determine the yearly KDRI₈₅ value. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data was used to calculate discard rates and model organ use. KDRI₈₅ varied between 1.768 and 1.888. In a multivariable analysis, kidney utilization was lower for KDPI 86% compared with KDPI 85% kidneys (p = .046). Kidneys with a KDRI between 1.785-1.849 were classified as KDPI_HIGH in the years 2015-2017 and KDPI_LOW in the years 2018-2020. The discard rate was 44.9% when labeled as KDPI_HIGH and 39.1% when labeled as KDPI_LOW (p < .01). For kidneys with the same KDRI, the high KDPI label is associated with increased discard. We should reconsider the appropriateness of the "high KDPI" label.

Patient Preferences for Waiting Time and Kidney Quality

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Approximately 20% of deceased donor kidneys are discarded each year in the United States. Some of these kidneys could benefit patients who are waitlisted. Understanding patient preferences regarding accepting marginal-quality kidneys could help more of the currently discarded kidneys be transplanted.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This study uses a discrete choice experiment that presents a deceased donor kidney to patients who are waiting for, or have received, a kidney transplant. The choices involve trade-offs between accepting a kidney today or a future kidney. The options were designed experimentally to quantify the relative importance of kidney quality (expected graft survival and level of kidney function) and waiting time. Choices were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model and latent-class analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 605 participants completed the discrete choice experiment. Respondents made trade-offs between kidney quality and waiting time. The average respondent would accept a kidney today, with 6.5 years of expected graft survival (95% confidence interval, 5.9 to 7.0), to avoid waiting 2 additional years for a kidney, with 11 years of expected graft survival. Three patient-preference classes were identified. Class 1 was averse to additional waiting time, but still responsive to improvements in kidney quality. Class 2 was less willing to accept increases in waiting time for improvements in kidney quality. Class 3 was willing to accept increases in waiting time even for small improvements in kidney quality. Relative to class 1, respondents in class 3 were likely to be age ≤61 years and to be waitlisted before starting dialysis, and respondents in class 2 were more likely to be older, Black, not have a college degree, and have lower Karnofsky performance status.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants preferred accepting a lower-quality kidney in return for shorter waiting time, particularly those who were older and had lower functional status.

Waitlisted and Transplant Patient Perspectives on Expanding Access to Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant: A Qualitative Study

Background:

A concerning number of kidneys (eg, expanded donor criteria, extended criteria, or marginal kidneys) are discarded yearly while patients experience significant morbidity and mortality on the transplant waitlist. Novel solutions are needed to solve the shortage of kidneys available for transplant. Patient perceptions regarding the use of these less than ideal kidneys remain unexplored.

Objective:

To explore the perspectives of patients who have previously received a less than ideal kidney in the past and patients awaiting transplant who could potentially benefit from one.

Design:

Qualitative description study.

Setting:

2 provinces in Canada participated (Saskatchewan and Manitoba).

Patients:

Patients with end-stage kidney disease who were awaiting kidney transplant and were either (a) aged 65 years and older, or (b) 55 years and older with other medical conditions (eg, diabetes).

Methods:

Criterion sampling was used to identify participants. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted virtually, which explored perceived quality of life, perceptions of less than ideal kidneys, risk tolerance for accepting one, and educational needs to make such a choice. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results:

15 interviews were conducted with usable data (n = 10 pretransplant; n = 5 posttransplant). Participants were a mean of 65.5 ± 8.8 years old. Four interrelated themes became prominent including (1) patient awareness and understanding of their situation or context, (2) a desire for information, (3) a desire for freedom from dialysis, and (4) trust. Subthemes of transparency, clarity, standardization, and autonomy were deemed important for participant education. The majority of pretransplant participants (n = 8/10) indicated that between 3 and 5 years off of dialysis would make the risk of accepting a less than ideal kidney feel worthwhile.

Limitation:

The study setting was limited to 2 Canadian provinces, which limits the generalizability. Furthermore, the participants were homogenous in demographics such as ethnicity.

Conclusion:

These findings indicate that patients are comfortable to accept a less than ideal kidney for transplant in situations where their autonomy is respected, they are provided clear, standardized, and transparent information, and when they trust their physician. These results will be used to inform the development of a new national registry for expanding access to deceased-donor kidney transplant.

Trial Registration:

Not registered.

Kidney transplant candidates' and recipients' perspectives on the decision-making process to accept or refuse a deceased donor kidney offer: Trust and graft survival matter

BACKGROUND

The decision to accept a kidney from a deceased donor can be a difficult one. This study aims to capture the perspectives of transplant candidates (TCs) and kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) on the decision-making process when a deceased kidney is offered.

METHODS

We conducted six focus groups with KTRs and TCs. The content of the focus groups was analyzed using the qualitative thematic method.

RESULTS

KTRs reported that the experience of being offered a kidney could be difficult because of the circumstances of the offer and unpreparedness to participate in the discussion. Both KTRs and TCs trusted the medical expertise. Age and having experience with dialysis could influence the decision to accept an offer. In order to engage in the discussion, patients wanted to obtain estimates of expected graft survival. Patients did not express interest for a web-based calculator for patient use, but expected transplant physicians to summarize and explain the information that would impact graft survival time.

CONCLUSION

TCs and KTRs wanted to be involved in the decision to accept a deceased donor kidney. Tools that can help physicians communicate the risks and benefits of accepting an offer could improve patient participation in the decision-making process.