Cytomegalovirus Immunity Assays Predict Viremia but not Replication Within the Lung Allograft

The changing landscape of infections in the lung transplant recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections in lung transplant recipients remain a major challenge and can affect lung allograft function and cause significant morbidity and mortality. New strategies for the prevention and treatment of infection in lung transplantation have emerged and are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

For important vaccine preventable infections (VPIs), guidance has been updated for at risk solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, data on the efficacy of newer vaccines in lung transplant, including the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, are limited. Studies demonstrate improved vaccination rate with Infectious Diseases consultation during pretransplant evaluation. Two new antiviral agents for the treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in SOT, letermovir and maribavir, are being incorporated into clinical care. CMV-specific cell-mediated immune function assays are more widely available. Antibiotics for the management of multidrug resistant pathogens and Burkholderia cepacia complex have been described in case series and case reports in lung transplant.

SUMMARY

Although new vaccines and novel therapies for preventing and treating infections are available, larger studies evaluating efficacy in lung transplant recipients are needed.

A call for cytomegalovirus stewardship initiatives in cardiothoracic transplant

Despite the availability of potent antiviral therapy and increasingly long prophylaxis courses, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to negatively affect outcomes after cardiothoracic transplant (CT). CMV antiviral stewardship (AVS) represents an opportunity to implement organ-specific prophylaxis, treatment, and monitoring algorithms while optimizing care of the allograft and patient. Within the nuanced context of heart and lung transplant recipients, CMV prophylaxis, monitoring, and treatment strategies are reviewed for efficacy and safety. These insights highlight opportunities for CMV AVS programs to combine organ- and patient-specific data while implementing CMV guidelines, appropriately adopted to local context by local experts, with concurrent and retrospective evaluation for each patient and the transplant program. By applying concepts of CMV AVS currently practiced in abdominal transplant, CT programs can work to improve graft and patient outcomes related to CMV, including ongoing challenges such as atherosclerosis and impaired endothelial function in heart transplant recipients and chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. While implementation of CMV AVS is not without challenges, it also represents an opportunity for multidisciplinary teams to foster the development of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity and improve long-term outcomes.