Towards clinical outcome measures in myotonic dystrophy type 2: a systematic review

Treatments and therapies for symptoms and clinical manifestations of adult type 1 myotonic dystrophy: A scoping review

Myotonic Dystrophy is the most common adult-onset muscular dystrophy, with a broad, multi-systemic presentation. There is no cure, so quality-of-life improvements rely on treatment of symptoms and clinical manifestations. This review aimed to synthesize primary research evaluating treatments or therapies for symptoms and clinical manifestations of adult type 1 Myotonic Dystrophy and map targets against patient-reported symptom burden. Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies published to 16th of October 2024. Two independent reviewers screened title and abstract, then full-text records for eligibility and conflicts were settled by group discussion. Study information was extracted, and treatment targets were mapped against patient-reported symptom burden as reported by Hagerman et al. The literature was limited to only 86 studies; 2/3 conducted in cohorts of <30 participants. Main target symptoms were muscle (50 %), respiratory (15.1 %), central nervous system (12.7 %) and cardiac conduction disorders (10.5 %). Most treatments were pharmacotherapies (43 %), followed by physical training (15.1 %), Non-invasive Ventilation (11.5 %), and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (10.5 %). The distribution of treatment targets was poorly representative of patient-reported symptoms. Outcome measures, clinical and patient-reported, were varied and utilized without standardization within treatment categories. These findings emphasize the need for evidence-based clinical management targeting patient priorities to produce quality-of-life improvements.

Cerebral involvement and related aspects in myotonic dystrophy type 2

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant multisystemic disorder caused by CCTG repeats expansion in the first intron of the CNBP gene. In this review we focus on the brain involvement in DM2, including its pathogenic mechanisms, microstructural, macrostructural and functional brain changes, as well as the effects of all these impairments on patients' everyday life. We also try to understand how brain abnormalities in DM2 should be adequately measured and potentially treated. The most important pathogenetic mechanisms in DM2 are RNA gain-of-function and repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation. One of the main neuroimaging findings in DM2 is the presence of diffuse periventricular white matter hyperintensity lesions (WMHLs). Brain atrophy has been described in DM2 patients, but it is not clear if it is mostly caused by a decrease of the white or gray matter volume. The most commonly reported specific cognitive symptoms in DM2 are dysexecutive syndrome, visuospatial and memory impairments. Fatigue, sleep-related disorders and pain are also frequent in DM2. The majority of key symptoms and signs in DM2 has a great influence on patients' daily lives, their psychological status, economic situation and quality of life.

Muscle Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography as a Non-Invasive Biomarker in Myotonia

Myotonia, i.e., delayed muscle relaxation in certain hereditary muscle disorders, can be assessed quantitatively using different techniques ranging from force measurements to electrodiagnostics. Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) has been proposed as a novel tool in biomechanics and neuromuscular medicine for the non-invasive estimation of muscle elasticity and, indirectly, muscle force. The aim of this study is to provide ‘proof-of-principle’ that SWE allows a quantitative measurement of the duration of delayed muscle relaxation in myotonia in a simple clinical setting. In six myotonic muscle disorder patients and six healthy volunteers, shear wave velocities (SWV) parallel to the fiber orientation in the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle in the forearm were recorded with a temporal resolution of one per second during fist-clenching and subsequent relaxation; the relaxation time to 10% of normalized shear wave velocity (RT_0.1) was calculated. Forty-six SWE imaging sequences were acquired, yielding a mean RT_0.1 of 7.38 s in myotonic muscle disorder patients, significantly higher than in healthy volunteers (1.36 s), which is comparable to data obtained by mechanical dynamometry. SWV measurements during the baseline relaxation and voluntary contraction phases did not differ significantly between groups. We conclude that SWE is a promising, non-invasive, widely available tool for the quantitative assessment of myotonia to aid in diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring.

How to capture activities of daily living in myotonic dystrophy type 2?

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) lacks validated patients´ reported outcomes (PROs). This represents a limit for monitoring disease progression and perceived efficacy of symptomatic treatments. Our aim was to investigate whether PROs for activities of daily living designed for other neuromuscular diseases could be used in DM2. Sixty-six DM2 patients completed the following PROs: DM1-Activ-c, Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity (R-PAct) scale, McGill-pain questionnaire, fatigue and daytime sleepiness scale and Beck depression inventory (BDI-II). Clinical data and motor outcome measures (6-minutes walking test - 6MWT, manual muscle testing, quick motor function test and myotonia behavior scale) were collected as well. Patients underwent one visit at baseline and one after 10 months. Ceiling/flooring effects, criterion validity and discriminant validity were calculated. DM1-activ-c and R-PAct showed acceptable ceiling effects despite being built for myotonic dystrophy type 1 and Pompe disease, respectively. The difficulty hierarchy of the single items was better preserved in R-PAct than in DM1-Activ-c. Both tests showed excellent criterion validity highly correlating with 6MWT, quick motor function test, myalgia and disease duration. They could partially discriminate patients with different disability grades. These results suggest that DM1-Activ-c, slightly better than R-PAct, might be adopted for monitoring activities of daily living also in DM2, at least until disease-specific PROs will be available.

Validation of Motor Outcome Measures in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Introduction: Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) lacks disease-specific, validated, motor outcome measures (OMs), and patients' reported outcomes (PROs). This represents a limit for the monitoring of disease progression and treatment response. Our aim was to identify the most appropriate OMs to be translated in clinical practice and clinical trials on DM2. This study has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT03603171 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03603171). Methods: Sixty-six patients with genetically confirmed DM2 underwent a baseline and a follow-up visit after 1 year. The tested OMs included: hand opening time, pressure pain threshold (PPT), manual muscle testing (MMT), hand held dynamometry (HHD), scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), quantitative motor function test (QMFT), gait stairs Gowers chair (GSGC), 30-s sit to stand test, functional index 2 (FI-2) and 6MWT. The PROs included DM1-Active-C, Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity scale (R-Pact), fatigue and daytime sleepiness (FDSS), brief pain inventory short form (BPI-sf), myotonia behavior scale (MBS), and the McGill pain questionnaire. Results: All patients completed the MBS and the results correlated well with the hand-opening time. The PPT showed a low reliability, no correlation with pain questionnaires, and did not differentiate patients with or without myalgia. Both muscle strength assessments, MMT and HHD, showed good construct validity. The QMFT showed an acceptable ceiling effect (14.5%), good convergent and differential validity and performed overall better than GSGC. The SARA score showed high flooring effect and is not useful in DM2. 6MWT proved a valid outcome measure in DM2. The 30-s sit to stand is a feasible test with good convergent validity, showing a flooring effect of 20% as it cannot be used in more severely affected patients. The FI-2 is time-consuming and has a high ceiling effect. At the 1-year visit the only assessments able to detect a worsening of DM2 were HHD, QMFT, and 6MWT, which are the most sensitive to change, and therefore clinically meaningful OMs in DM2. Conclusion: The clinical meaningful motor outcome measures that best depict the multifaceted phenotype of DM2 and its slow progression are MBS, MMT, or HHD (depending on the clinical setting), QMFT, and the 6MWT.