Emerging approaches in neurostimulation for epilepsy

A Comprehensive Overview of the Current Status and Advancements in Various Treatment Strategies against Epilepsy

Epilepsy affects more than 70 million individuals of all ages worldwide and remains one of the most severe chronic noncommunicable neurological diseases globally. Several neurotransmitters, membrane protein channels, receptors, enzymes, and, more recently noted, various pathways, such as inflammatory and mTORC complexes, play significant roles in the initiation and propagation of seizures. Over the past two decades, significant developments have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy. Various pharmacological drugs with diverse mechanisms of action and other treatment options have been developed to control seizures and treat epilepsy. These options include surgical treatment, nanomedicine, gene therapy, natural products, nervous stimulation, a ketogenic diet, gut microbiota, etc., which are in various developmental stages. Despite a plethora of drugs and other treatment options, one-third of affected individuals are resistant to current medications, while the majority of approved drugs have severe side effects, and significant changes can occur, such as pharmacoresistance, effects on cognition, long-term problems, drug interactions, risks of poor adherence, specific effects for certain medications, and psychological complications. Therefore, the development of new drugs and other treatment options that have no or minimal adverse effects is needed to combat this deadly disease. In this Review, we comprehensively summarize and explain all of the treatment options that have been approved or are in developmental stages for epilepsy as well as their status in clinical trials and advancements.

Bilateral pulvinar responsive neurostimulation for bilateral multifocal posteriorly dominant drug resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To describe four cases of Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) in the bilateral pulvinar nuclei (PUL) in individuals with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). This will show that due to widespread PUL connectivity, bilateral PUL RNS may be an option for some individuals with bilateral multifocal epilepsy.

METHODS

This study comprises two centers' experience with bilateral PUL RNS for DRE. Patients treated with bilateral PUL RNS at Westchester Medical Center (Valhalla, NY) and Corewell Health (Grand Rapids, MI) between the years 2019 and 2022 were analyzed and described. Presented here are methods for target selection, device programming, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Two patients with Lennox-Gastaut phenotype (aged 13 and 21 years) with posteriorly dominant discharges were implanted with bilateral PUL electrodes. Additionally, two patients (aged 20 and 31 years) with independent left and right occipital bilateral multifocal seizure onsets were implanted with bilateral RNS devices targeting the ipsilateral PUL and ipsilateral occipital cortex. Subclinical and clinical seizures were captured by RNS electrocorticography (ECoG) in all patients. RNS implantation and treatment was well-tolerated without adverse effects in all patients. Relative to baseline, two patients had 25% and 50% reduction in disabling seizures, and two patients had 71% and 100% reduction in disabling seizures. Stimulation paradigms utilized high frequency stimulation in both Lennox-Gastaut phenotype patients. Low frequency (individualized to the terminal ictal frequencies) stimulation was effective in the two bioccipital patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

RNS with electrode placement targeting bilateral PUL is safe, and no adverse effects have been attributable to the pulvinar electrode placement. PUL responsive neurostimulation is potentially effective for patients with bilateral multifocal, posteriorly dominant DRE. Both high and low frequency responsive stimulation are treatment options. Longer follow-up will shed light on the ultimate reduction of seizure burden.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

We describe four cases where stimulation devices were placed in the Pulvinar area of the thalamus (central sensory area in the brain). This is very unique and different location than where these devices are typically placed. These patients all had great outcomes with marked seizure reduction, demonstrating that this placement is both safe and effective.

Transcranial direct current stimulation in the management of epilepsy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently become a novel and non-invasive treatment option for refractory epilepsy. Previous systematic reviews have suggested that tDCS may be effective in treating epilepsy, this study presents the first meta-analysis on its effectiveness.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from database inception to May 2024. The Cochrane risk of bias tool RoB2.0 was used to assess the risk of bias. Primary outcomes included changes in seizure frequency from baseline and the proportion of patients with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency.

Results

Of the 608 studies initially identified, 14 were finally included. The pooled results from the random-effects model indicated that tDCS significantly reduced seizure frequency (WMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.24, 0.59). Further subgroup analysis revealed that tDCS significantly reduced seizure frequency in temporal lobe epilepsy, and seizure frequency was more alleviated in studies that had treatment sessions of fewer than 5 times, and followed up within 2 months' post-treatment. Only four studies provided data on patients with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, showing no significant difference (RR 2.96, 95% CI 0.85, 10.32). In the systematic review, three studies analyzed cognitive function changes after tDCS treatment, but none reported significant improvements. The most common side effect during tDCS treatment was transient tingling, and no patients required additional life-support measures due to side effects.

Conclusion

The current meta-analysis on available trials indicates that tDCS can effectively reduce seizure frequency in the short term and is well-tolerated. However, its impact on cognitive improvement in epilepsy patients requires further investigation.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-6-0033/, identifier INPLASY202460033.

Patient-Specific Electrical Stimulation to Effectively Suppress Seizures using a Data-Driven Dynamical Network Model

Seizure suppression is critical for enhancing the quality of life for patients with epilepsy. However, nearly 15 million patients have medically refractory epilepsy, meaning their seizures cannot be suppressed with medication. Electrical stimulation therapy is an alternative therapy to suppress seizures. However, determining where and how to stimulate remains an open problem. Currently, physicians rely on trial-and-error, which is inefficient. In this work, we present a data-driven patient-specific method that identifies the best location to stimulate and designs the stimulation signal to suppress seizures by leveraging the patient's cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs). Specifically, we construct transfer function models from the CCEPs recordings and plot the magnitude response versus frequency. From this bode plot, we obtain the frequency that minimizes the magnitude response in the seizure onset zone (SOZ) channels. In silico, we demonstrate that our method suppresses signals in the clinically annotated SOZ by up to 81%. Our method lays the groundwork for neurostimulation to be an effective treatment for medically refractory epilepsy. Future work will focus on prospectively validating this method in the clinic.

Trends in the Utilization of Surgical Modalities for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Comprehensive 10-Year Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Epilepsy is considered one of the most prevalent and severe chronic neurological disorders worldwide. Our study aims to analyze the national trends in different treatment modalities for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy and investigate the outcomes associated with these procedural trends in the United States.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2020, patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), open surgical resection, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) were identified. Trend analysis was performed using piecewise joinpoint regression. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between 10 years prepandemic before 2020 and the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

This study analyzed a total of 33 969 patients with a diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy, with 3343 patients receiving surgical resection (78%), VNS (8.21%), RNS (8%), and LITT (6%). Between 2010 and 2020, there was an increase in the use of invasive electroencephalography monitoring for seizure zone localization (P = .003). There was an increase in the use of LITT and RNS (P < .001), while the use of surgical resection and VNS decreased over time (P < .001). Most of these patients (89%) were treated during the pre-COVID pandemic era (2010-2019), while a minority (11%) underwent treatment during the COVID pandemic (2020). After propensity score matching, the rate of pulmonary complications, postprocedural hematoma formation, and mortality were slightly higher during the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period (P = .045, P = .033, and P = .026, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates a relative decrease in the use of surgical resections, as a treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. By contrast, newer, minimally invasive surgical approaches including LITT and RNS showed gradual increases in usage.

Stimulation of the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus in epilepsy: A systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) analysis

Emerging neuromodulatory treatments, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), have shown promise in reducing drug-resistant seizures. While centromedian thalamic nucleus and anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation have been effective in certain types of seizures, limited research has explored pulvinar nucleus stimulation for epilepsy. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and individual patient data analysis. Of 78 resultant articles, 5 studies with transient stimulation and chronic stimulation of the pulvinar nucleus were included. Of the 20 patients reviewed, 65% of patients had temporal lobe seizures, while 20% had temporooccipital/occipital lobe seizures. Transient stimulation studies via stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) showed pulvinar evoked potential response rates of 80% in the mesial temporal region, 76% in the temporal neocortex, and 67% in the TP junction. Another study reported clinically less severe seizures in 62.5% of patients with pulvinar stimulation. In chronic stimulation studies, 80% of patients responded to RNS or DBS, and 2 of 4 patients experienced > 90% seizure reduction. The pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus emerges as a potential target for chronic stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy. However, knowledge regarding pulvinar connectivity and chronic stimulation remains limited. Further research should investigate specific subregions of the pulvinar for epilepsy treatment. Understanding the role of pulvinar stimulation and its cortical connectivity will advance therapeutic interventions for epilepsy patients.

The Utility of Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has a strongly negative impact on quality of life, as well as the development of pediatric patients. Surgical treatments have evolved over time, including more invasive craniotomies for resection or disconnection. More recently, neuromodulation techniques have been employed as a less invasive option for patients. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is the first closed-loop technology that allows for both treatment and device data collection, which allows for an internal assessment of the efficacy of treatment. This novel technology has been approved in adults and has been used off label in pediatrics. This review seeks to describe this technology, its history, and future directions.

Drug-resistant epilepsy: Definition, pathophysiology, and management

There are currently >51 million people with epilepsy (PWE) in the world and every year >4.9 million people develop new-onset epilepsy. The cornerstone of treatment in PWE is drug therapy with antiseizure medications (ASMs). However, about one-third of PWE do not achieve seizure control and do not respond well to drug therapy despite the use of appropriate ASMs [drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE)]. The aims of the current narrative review are to discuss the definition of DRE, explain the biological underpinnings and clinical biomarkers of this condition, and finally to suggest practical management strategies to tackle this issue appropriately, in a concise manner.

Evaluation of Pharmacology and Pathophysiology Knowledge of Epilepsy among Senior Pharmacy Students: A Single Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Epilepsy is a chronic disease that causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Pharmacists represent an integral role in managing patients with epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge about the pharmacology and pathophysiology of epilepsy among senior pharmacy students. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional study using a designed questionnaire to measure the pharmacological and physiological knowledge of senior pharmacy students regarding epilepsy who are studying at Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, from August to October 2022. Results: A total of 211 senior clinical pharmacy students responded to the questionnaire. The majority of the respondents were 4th year pharmacy students. The numbers of female and male participants were equal (106 and 105 students, respectively). The participants represented an acceptable level of knowledge about the pathophysiology aspects of epilepsy, with a mean total score of 6.22 ± 1.9 out of a maximum score of 10. The respondents reported that epilepsy could be due to genetic predisposition combined with environmental conditions (80.1%) or brain stroke (17.1%). Regarding the respondent knowledge about the pharmacology of epilepsy, the total score was 4.6 ± 2.1 (maximum attainable score: 9). Conclusions: The majority of pharmacy students had knowledge about the pathophysiology concept of the disease; however, low knowledge was shown by the respondents regarding the pharmacology of epilepsy. Thus, there is a need to identify better strategies to improve students' education.