Characteristics of Escitalopram Discontinuation Syndrome: A Preliminary Study

Incidence and risk factors of antidepressant withdrawal symptoms: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Antidepressants are among the most extensively prescribed psychotropic drugs worldwide. Discontinuation induced withdrawal symptoms have been reported for almost all antidepressants. The incidence of antidepressant withdrawal syndrome (AWS) and other characteristics remain unknown. We searched the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to December 31, 2023. Randomized double-blinded trials, longitudinal or cross-sectional studies that reported the incidence and other characteristics of antidepressant withdrawal symptoms were included. The pooled incidence of AWS was calculated by a random effects model. We included 35 studies, of which 2 studies just provided incidence of specific withdrawal symptoms, and 4 studies only described other characteristics. The pooled incidence of AWS from all available studies was 42.9%, from 11 RCTs was 44.4%, in studies in which the treatment duration was mostly 8-12 weeks, which usually appear within 2 weeks, and were generally measured for <4 weeks. The incidence in selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors was the lowest (29.7%), followed by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (45.6%) and tricyclic antidepressants (59.7%), without significant differences (p = 0.221). Treatment duration showed a dose-response to the incidence of AWS (6-12 W: 35.1%, 12-24 W: 42.7%, >24 W: 51.4%). The half-life did not show such a simple dose-dependent relationship. The pooled estimate was robust regardless whether withdrawal symptoms were measured in RCTs or observational studies (including face-to-face and online survey studies). Tapering the dose reduced the incidence of AWS compared with abrupt stoppage (34.5% vs 42.5%), without a significant difference (p = 0.484). Risk factors for withdrawal symptoms included being female, younger, experiencing adverse effects early in treatment, taking higher doses or longer duration of medication, abrupt cessation of drugs, and those with a lower clearance of drugs or with serotonin 1A receptor gene variation. The findings suggest the incidence of AWS are common and some clinical characteristics and risk factors which can help clinicians identify who is at greater risk of experiencing AWS. Discontinuation studies on long-term antidepressant users with long follow-up periods are required in the future.

Insufficient correctness of package inserts for psychotropic drugs in Germany

Package inserts often cause displeasure among patients as they are perceived as misleading and confusing. The aim of this study was to find out how comprehensible, complete, and truthful package inserts are formulated in Germany. 311 package inserts for antipsychotics (mGPCR antagonists) and antidepressants (NE/5-HT enhancers) from different manufacturers and dosages were analysed. The analysis criteria included the description of the effect, the warning of increased suicide risk, the explanation of interactions with co-medication, food and stimulants, as well as alcohol and the warning of impaired roadworthiness. In addition, the timeliness of the information regarding pregnancy and breastfeeding was checked and the symptoms mentioned under the topic of discontinuation symptoms and adverse drug reactions were compared. For most parameters, inconsistencies among various products, deficiencies and incorrect information were noted. This was particularly true for the items pregnancy and breastfeeding. Thus, package inserts for mGPCR antagonists and NE/5-HT enhancers need to be updated and standardised urgently. Such measures will reduce confusion among patients and increase drug adherence.

Assessing Pharmacokinetic Correlates of Escitalopram-Related Adverse Drug Reactions

BACKGROUND

To assess the pharmacokinetic correlates of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) under antidepressant treatment with escitalopram (ESC) using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database.

METHODS

A large naturalistic sample of inpatients and outpatients prescribed ESC was analyzed. ADRs were classified using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect rating scale. We compared ESC-treated patients with (n = 35) and without ADRs (n = 273) using ESC plasma concentrations as the primary outcome. We also compared ADR rates in the 2 groups based on 2 cut-off ESC levels reflecting the recommended upper thresholds of the therapeutic reference range of 80 ng/mL, suggested by the consensus therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines, and 40 ng/mL, based on recent meta-analysis data. The effects of age, sex, smoking, daily ESC dose, plasma concentrations, and concentrations corrected for daily dose were included in a binary logistic regression model to predict ADRs.

RESULTS

No differences in clinical, demographic, or pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between patients with and without ADRs ( P > 0.05). Patients with ESC-related ADRs were more frequently diagnosed with psychotic disorders than those without (25% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.004). None of the variables was associated with ADR risk. Overall, ADR rates were not significantly different in patients above versus below thresholds of ESC concentrations (ESC concentrations >40 [n = 59] vs. ≤40 ng/mL [n = 249] and >80 [n = 8] vs. ≤80 ng/mL [n = 300]; P = 0.56 and P = 1.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

No distinct pharmacokinetic patterns underlying ESC-associated ADRs were observed. Further studies with more specific assessments of ADRs in larger cohorts are required to better identify potential underlying patterns.

Dose-response effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of depression: systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesis

Objective

To assess and clarify the relations between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) dose efficacy, acceptability (early treatment discontinuation (dropouts)), and tolerability (reported adverse drug effects), and critically evaluate methods previously used to examine SSRI dose-response effects for the treatment of depression in adults.

Design

Systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesis.

Data sources

Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration library, from 1975 to December 2021. Reference lists of national depression treatment guidelines were systemically searched by hand.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

Reviews assessing SSRI monotherapy dose-response effects for the treatment of depression in adults (age ≥18 years) reporting efficacy, acceptability, or tolerability. Reviews meeting inclusion criteria had a high degree of heterogeneity, due to methodological diversity; therefore, a meta-narrative synthesis approach was applied. Standard daily doses were defined as 20 mg citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine; 50 mg sertraline; and 10 mg escitalopram. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool, in line with Cochrane recommendations.

Results

The search identified 9138 records; 387 full text reports were assessed for eligibility, 42 of which matched the inclusion criteria. The majority, 83% (n=35), of reviews included data for studies with a duration of ≤12 weeks (ie, the acute phase of depression treatment). Of 39 reviews assessing efficacy, the majority (n=26) indicated that individual SSRIs and SSRI class demonstrated flat dose-response effects; standard doses were optimal for efficacy. Acceptability or tolerability were assessed in 28 reviews. Higher than standard daily doses were associated with higher dropout rates and a greater incidence of adverse drug effects (eg, nausea, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, anxiety). Despite a range of methods being reported, there was an overall consensus regarding SSRI dose related efficacy, dropouts, and adverse drug effects.

Conclusion

Standard daily doses of SSRIs for the treatment of depression in adults provide a favourable balance between efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability. Patients are encouraged to talk to their prescriber or community pharmacist if they experience adverse effects or have any concerns about their drug treatments.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the therapeutic reference range for escitalopram: Blood concentrations, clinical effects and serotonin transporter occupancy

INTRODUCTION

A titration within a certain therapeutic reference range presupposes a relationship between the blood concentration and the therapeutic effect of a drug. However, this has not been systematically investigated for escitalopram. Furthermore, the recommended reference range disagrees with mean steady state concentrations (11-21 ng/ml) that are expected under the approved dose range (10-20 mg/day). This work systematically investigated the relationships between escitalopram dose, blood levels, clinical effects, and serotonin transporter occupancy.

METHODS

Following our previously published methodology, relevant articles were systematically searched and reviewed for escitalopram.

RESULTS

Of 1,032 articles screened, a total of 30 studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies investigated escitalopram blood levels in relationship to clinical effects (9 studies) or moderating factors on escitalopram metabolism (12 studies) or serotonin transporter occupancy (9 studies). Overall, the evidence for an escitalopram concentration/effect relationship is low (level C).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, we propose a target range of 20-40 ng/ml for antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram. In maintenance treatment, therapeutic response is expected, when titrating patients above the lower limit. The lower concentration threshold is strongly supported by findings from neuroimaging studies. The upper limit for escitalopram's reference range rather reflects a therapeutic maximum than a tolerability threshold, since the incidence of side effects in general is low. Concentrations above 40 ng/ml should not necessarily result in dose reductions in case of good clinical efficacy and tolerability. Dose-related escitalopram concentrations in different trials were more than twice the expected concentrations from guideline reports.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=215873], identifier [CRD42020215873].

A systematic review into the incidence, severity and duration of antidepressant withdrawal effects: Are guidelines evidence-based?

INTRODUCTION

The U.K.'s current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the American Psychiatric Association's depression guidelines state that withdrawal reactions from antidepressants are 'self-limiting' (i.e. typically resolving between 1 and 2weeks). This systematic review assesses that claim.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was undertaken to ascertain the incidence, severity and duration of antidepressant withdrawal reactions. We identified 24 relevant studies, with diverse methodologies and sample sizes.

RESULTS

Withdrawal incidence rates from 14 studies ranged from 27% to 86% with a weighted average of 56%. Four large studies of severity produced a weighted average of 46% of those experiencing antidepressant withdrawal effects endorsing the most extreme severity rating on offer. Seven of the ten very diverse studies providing data on duration contradict the U.K. and U.S.A. withdrawal guidelines in that they found that a significant proportion of people who experience withdrawal do so for more than two weeks, and that it is not uncommon for people to experience withdrawal for several months. The findings of the only four studies calculating mean duration were, for quite heterogeneous populations, 5days, 10days, 43days and 79weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that U.K. and U.S.A. guidelines on antidepressant withdrawal be urgently updated as they are clearly at variance with the evidence on the incidence, severity and duration of antidepressant withdrawal, and are probably leading to the widespread misdiagnosing of withdrawal, the consequent lengthening of antidepressant use, much unnecessary antidepressant prescribing and higher rates of antidepressant prescriptions overall. We also recommend that prescribers fully inform patients about the possibility of withdrawal effects.

Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms

All classes of drug that are prescribed to treat depression are associated with withdrawal syndromes. SSRI withdrawal syndrome occurs often and can be severe, and might compel patients to recommence their medication. Although the withdrawal syndrome can be differentiated from recurrence of the underlying disorder, it might also be mistaken for recurrence, leading to long-term unnecessary medication. Guidelines recommend short tapers, of between 2 weeks and 4 weeks, down to therapeutic minimum doses, or half-minimum doses, before complete cessation. Studies have shown that these tapers show minimal benefits over abrupt discontinuation, and are often not tolerated by patients. Tapers over a period of months and down to doses much lower than minimum therapeutic doses have shown greater success in reducing withdrawal symptoms. Other types of medication associated with withdrawal, such as benzodiazepenes, are tapered to reduce their biological effect at receptors by fixed amounts to minimise withdrawal symptoms. These dose reductions are done with exponential tapering programmes that reach very small doses. This method could have relevance for tapering of SSRIs. We examined the PET imaging data of serotonin transporter occupancy by SSRIs and found that hyperbolically reducing doses of SSRIs reduces their effect on serotonin transporter inhibition in a linear manner. We therefore suggest that SSRIs should be tapered hyperbolically and slowly to doses much lower than those of therapeutic minimums, in line with tapering regimens for other medications associated with withdrawal symptoms. Withdrawal symptoms will then be minimised.