Effect of Amantadine on Agitation in Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Amantadine for Traumatic Brain Injury-Supporting Evidence and Mode of Action

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important global clinical issue, requiring not only prevention but also effective treatment. Following TBI, diverse parallel and intertwined pathological mechanisms affecting biochemical, neurochemical, and inflammatory pathways can have a severe impact on the patient's quality of life. The current review summarizes the evidence for the utility of amantadine in TBI in connection to its mechanism of action. Amantadine, the drug combining multiple mechanisms of action, may offer both neuroprotective and neuroactivating effects in TBI patients. Indeed, the use of amantadine in TBI has been encouraged by several clinical practice guidelines/recommendations. Amantadine is also available as an infusion, which may be of particular benefit in unconscious patients with TBI due to immediate delivery to the central nervous system and the possibility of precise dosing. In other situations, orally administered amantadine may be used. There are several questions that remain to be addressed: can amantadine be effective in disorders of consciousness requiring long-term treatment and in combination with drugs approved for the treatment of TBI? Do the observed beneficial effects of amantadine extend to disorders of consciousness due to factors other than TBI? Well-controlled clinical studies are warranted to ultimately confirm its utility in the TBI and provide answers to these questions.

Agitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of current and future concepts in diagnosis and management

OBJECTIVES

Agitation and aggression are common following traumatic brain injury. The challenges related to these disorders affect all stages of recovery, from the acute hospital to the community setting. The aim of this literature review is to provide an updated overview of the current state of post-traumatic agitation research.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed literature review which included recent confirmatory and novel research as well as classic and historical studies to integrate past and future concepts.

RESULTS

Areas explored include the personal and societal effects of post-traumatic agitation, methods for defining and diagnosing several neurobehavioral disorders, and pathophysiology and management of agitation and aggression. Target areas for future study are identified and discussed.

DISCUSSION

While much progress has been made in understanding post-traumatic agitation, there remain several key areas that require further elucidation to support the care and treatment for people with traumatic brain injury.

The Effect of Amantadine on Agitation in the Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Population: A Case Series

In this report, we present a case series involving four pediatric patients who sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and required intensive care unit admission immediately after the injury. In each of the four cases, amantadine was started during the acute care hospital admission to address agitation. Cases were retrieved from the electronic medical record at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022. This case series describes clinical data on TBI presentation, amantadine administration, patient behavior, and hospital course relating to agitation. This is the first publication that reports the effect of amantadine on agitation in the acute phase of recovery in the pediatric TBI population. Improvement in agitation was observed within 48 hours of amantadine initiation in all four cases based on the primary team progress notes, as well as the quantity of pro re nata medications given for agitation. Resolution of agitation was also observed in all cases, though the time scale varied. No adverse events were reported in relation to amantadine use, supporting other reports that the medication may be well tolerated in the pediatric population. More research is needed to determine the optimal dose of amantadine for the pediatric population and whether amantadine hastens agitation resolution compared to the current standard of care.

Pharmacologic Therapies to Promote Recovery of Consciousness

Pharmacologic interventions are commonly used to support rehabilitation efforts of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). The 2018 practice guidelines recommend amantadine in adults with traumatic DoC to promote functional recovery, though several other stimulants are used off-label in clinical practice and trials, such as methylphenidate, bromocriptine, levodopa, and zolpidem. Differences in the mechanisms of action, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics, and drug-drug interactions should be considered when selecting the best agent for each individual patient. Overall, pharmacologic stimulants may provide a safe and inexpensive pathway to increased functionality and participation in rehabilitation. This article provides a concise summary of scientific evidence supporting the use of pharmacologic therapies to stimulate recovery of consciousness in patients with DoC.

Assessment of the effect of amantadine in patients with traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury is a global burden. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of amantadine for cognitive performance after traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

The systematic review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews website under the registration number CRD42017080044. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to report the steps of meta-analysis. The search included electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, CENTRAL, ProQuest and ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry). Critical care medicine journals and clinical neurology specialty were searched using www.scimagojr.com. There was no publication date restriction. Two authors assessed studies' relevance and extracted data. Studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis Program versions 2.0 and 3.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies out of 3,440 records were included in the systematic review, of which only 14 clinical trials and 6 observational studies were included in the meta-analysis. Amantadine significantly enhanced the cognitive function relative to control group (mean difference [MD], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.66; p < 0.001, 16 studies, 1,127 participants, low certainty evidence). Consistent significant difference in favor of amantadine relative to control group was found (MD of 0.79 [95% CI, 0.34-1.24], very low certainty evidence, for cohort studies vs. MD of 0.40 [95% CI, 0.25-0.56], moderate certainty evidence, for RCTS). Starting amantadine in the first week after TBI had a significant effect on improving cognitive function (MD, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.45-1.49; 16 studies, 1,127 participants, low certainty). Amantadine showed a better effect when administered for less than 1 month (MD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56-1.11; low certainty) and to patients below 18 years of age (MD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99; low certainty) or to patients with less severe traumatic brain injury (MD, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18-0.62; low certainty). No statistically significant difference existed between amantadine and the control concerning the adverse events (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.88-3.44; p = 0.11, moderate certainty). Metaregression of the different clinical parameters, which are onset of treatment, age, and severity of traumatic brain injury, showed a statistically significant relation between onset of treatment and the effect size of amantadine. The relation between the other two parameters and the effect size of amantadine showed a marginal statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Amantadine may improve the cognitive function when used after TBI. Further research with high validity is needed to reach a solid conclusion about the use of amantadine in traumatic brain injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review/meta-analysis, level III.

Pharmacological Treatment of Agitation and/or Aggression in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Reviews

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the available literature on the pharmacological management of agitation and/or aggression in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), synthesize the available data, and provide guidelines.

DESIGN

Systematic review of systematic reviews.

MAIN MEASURES

A literature review of the following websites was performed looking for systematic reviews on the treatment of agitation and/or aggression among patients with TBI: PubMed, CINAHL, DynaMed, Health Business Elite, and EBSCO (Psychology and behavioral sciences collection). Two researchers independently assessed articles for meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were extracted on year of publication, reviewed databases, dates of coverage, search limitations, pharmacological agents of interest, and a list of all controlled studies included. The included controlled studies were then examined to determine potential reasons for any difference in recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature review led to 187 citations and 67 unique publications after removing the duplicates. Following review of the title/abstracts and full texts, a total of 11 systematic reviews were included. The systematic reviews evaluated the evidence for safety and efficacy of the following medications: amantadine, amphetamines, methylphenidate, antiepileptics, atypical and typical antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, β-blockers, and sertraline.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the results of this literature review, the authors recommend avoiding benzodiazepines and haloperidol for treating agitation and/or aggression in the context of TBI. Atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine in particular) can be considered as practical alternatives for the as-needed management of agitation and/or aggression in lieu of benzodiazepines and haloperidol. Amantadine, β-blockers (propranolol and pindolol), antiepileptics, and methylphenidate can be considered for scheduled treatment of agitation and/or aggression in patients with TBI.

Role of the Dopaminergic System in the Striatum and Its Association With Functional Recovery or Rehabilitation After Brain Injury

Disabilities are estimated to occur in approximately 2% of survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI) worldwide, and disability may persist even decades after brain injury. Facilitation or modulation of functional recovery is an important goal of rehabilitation in all patients who survive severe TBI. However, this recovery tends to vary among patients because it is affected by the biological and physical characteristics of the patients; the types, doses, and application regimens of the drugs used; and clinical indications. In clinical practice, diverse dopaminergic drugs with various dosing and application procedures are used for TBI. Previous studies have shown that dopamine (DA) neurotransmission is disrupted following moderate to severe TBI and have reported beneficial effects of drugs that affect the dopaminergic system. However, the mechanisms of action of dopaminergic drugs have not been completely clarified, partly because dopaminergic receptor activation can lead to restoration of the pathway of the corticobasal ganglia after injury in brain structures with high densities of these receptors. This review aims to provide an overview of the functionality of the dopaminergic system in the striatum and its roles in functional recovery or rehabilitation after TBI.

Agitation Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Is a Clinical Sign of Recovery of Consciousness

Objective: Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) often results in disorders of consciousness. Patients emerging from coma frequently exhibit aberrant behaviors such as agitation. These non-purposeful combative behaviors can interfere with medical care. Interestingly, agitation is associated with arousal and is often among the first signs of neurological recovery. A better understanding of these behaviors may shed light on the mechanisms driving the return of consciousness in sTBI patients. This study aims to investigate the association between posttraumatic agitation and the recovery of consciousness.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 530 adult patients (29.1% female) admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2019 with a diagnosis of sTBI and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8. Agitation was defined as a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) > +1, or any documentation of equivalently combative and violent behaviors in daily clinical notes. The ability to follow verbal commands was used to define the recovery of consciousness and was assessed daily.

Results: Of 530 total sTBI patients, 308 (58.1%) survived. Agitation was present in 169 of all patients and 162 (52.6%) of surviving patients. A total of 273 patients followed commands, and 159 of them developed agitation. Forty patients developed agitation on hospital arrival whereas 119 developed agitation later during their hospital course. Presence of in-hospital agitation positively correlated with command-following (r = 0.315, p < 0.001). The time to develop agitation and time to follow commands showed positive correlation (r = 0.485, p < 0.001). These two events occurred within 3 days in 54 (44.6%) patients, within 7 days in 81 (67.8%) patients, and within 14 days in 96 (80.2%) patients. In 71 (59.7%) patients, agitation developed before command-following; in 36 (30.2%) patients, agitation developed after command-following; in 12 (10.1%) patients, agitation developed on the same day as command-following.

Conclusion: Posttraumatic agitation in comatose patients following sTBI is temporally associated with the recovery of consciousness. This behavior indicates the potential for recovery of higher neurological functioning. Further studies are required to identify neural correlates of posttraumatic agitation and recovery of consciousness after sTBI.

Amantadine: reappraisal of the timeless diamond-target updates and novel therapeutic potentials

The aim of the current review was to provide a new, in-depth insight into possible pharmacological targets of amantadine to pave the way to extending its therapeutic use to further indications beyond Parkinson's disease symptoms and viral infections. Considering amantadine's affinities in vitro and the expected concentration at targets at therapeutic doses in humans, the following primary targets seem to be most plausible: aromatic amino acids decarboxylase, glial-cell derived neurotrophic factor, sigma-1 receptors, phosphodiesterases, and nicotinic receptors. Further three targets could play a role to a lesser extent: NMDA receptors, 5-HT3 receptors, and potassium channels. Based on published clinical studies, traumatic brain injury, fatigue [e.g., in multiple sclerosis (MS)], and chorea in Huntington's disease should be regarded potential, encouraging indications. Preclinical investigations suggest amantadine's therapeutic potential in several further indications such as: depression, recovery after spinal cord injury, neuroprotection in MS, and cutaneous pain. Query in the database http://www.clinicaltrials.gov reveals research interest in several further indications: cancer, autism, cocaine abuse, MS, diabetes, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, obesity, and schizophrenia.

Ethical and legal considerations related to disorders of consciousness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe ethical and legal issues that arise in the management of patients with disorders of consciousness ranging from the minimally conscious state to the coma state, as well as brain death.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent literature highlights dilemmas created by diagnostic and prognostic uncertainties in patients with disorders of consciousness. The discussion also reveals the challenges experienced by the disability community, which includes individuals with severe brain injury who are classified as having a disorder of consciousness. We review current guidelines for management of patients with disorders of consciousness including discussions around diagnosis, prognosis, consideration of neuropalliation, and decisions around life sustaining medical treatment.

SUMMARY

In the setting of uncertainty, this review describes the utility of applying a disability rights perspective and shared decision-making process to approach medical decision-making for patients with disorders of consciousness. We outline approaches to identifying surrogate decision makers, standards for decision-making and decision-making processes, specifically addressing the concept of futility as a less useful framework for making decisions. We also highlight special considerations for research, innovative and controversial care, brain death, organ donation, and child abuse and neglect.

Therapeutic options for agitation in the intensive care unit

Agitation is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). There are numerous contributing factors, including pain, underlying disease, withdrawal syndrome, delirium and some medication. Agitation can compromise patient safety through accidental removal of tubes and catheters, prolong the duration of stay in the ICU, and may be related to various complications. This review aims to analyse evidence-based medical literature to improve management of agitation and to consider pharmacological strategies. The non-pharmacological approach is considered to reduce the risk of agitation. Pharmacological treatment of agitated patients is detailed and is based on a judicious choice of neuroleptics, benzodiazepines and α2 agonists, and on whether a withdrawal syndrome is identified. Specific management of agitation in elderly patients, brain-injured patients and patients with sleep deprivation are also discussed. This review proposes a practical approach for managing agitation in the ICU.

Amantadine and memantine: a comprehensive review for acquired brain injury

This comprehensive review discusses clinical studies of patients following brain injuries (traumatic, acquired, or stroke), who have been treated with amantadine or memantine. Both amantadine and memantine are commonly used in the acute rehabilitation setting following brain injuries, despite their lack of FDA-approval for neuro-recovery. Given the broad utilization of such agents, there is a need to review the evidence supporting this common off-label prescribing. The purpose of this review is to describe the mechanisms of action for memantine and amantadine, as well as to complete a comprehensive review of the clinical uses of these agents. We included 119 original, clinical research articles from NCBI Medline, published before 2019. We focused on the domains of neuroplasticity, functional recovery, motor recovery, arousal, fatigue, insomnia, behavior, agitation, and cognition. Most of the existing research supporting the use of amantadine and memantine in recovery from brain injuries was done in very small populations, limiting the significance of conclusions. While most studies are positive; small effect sizes are usually reported, or populations are subject to bias. Furthermore, evidence is so limited that this review includes research regarding both acute and chronic acquired brain injury populations. Fortunately, reported short-term side effects generally are modest, and stop soon after amantadine/memantine is discontinued. However, responses are inconsistent, and the phenotype of responders remains elusive.

Recent Clinical Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia

Onset of involuntary movement patterns of the face, body and limbs are known as dyskinesia. They mostly appear in association with long-term levodopa (L-dopa) therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease. Consequences include patient distress, caregiver embarrassment and reduced quality of life. A severe intensity of this motor complication may result in troublesome disability; however, patients typically prefer motor behaviour with slight, non-troublesome dyskinesia to 'OFF' states. Pharmacotherapy of dyskinesia is complex. Continuous nigrostriatal postsynaptic dopaminergic receptor stimulation may delay onset of L-dopa-associated dyskinesia, while non-physiological, 'pulsatile' receptor stimulation facilitates appearance of dyskinesia. In the past, there have been many clinical trial failures with compounds that were effective in animal models of dyskinesia. Only the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist amantadine has shown moderate antidyskinetic effects in small well-designed clinical studies. Amantadine is an old antiviral compound, which moderately improves impaired motor behaviour. Recently, there has been a resurgence of its use due to the US Food and Drug Administration approval of an extended-release (ER) amantadine formulation for treatment of L-dopa-induced dyskinesia. This pharmacokinetic innovation improved dyskinesia and 'OFF' states in pivotal trials, with a once-daily oral application in the evening. Amantadine ER provides higher and more continuous amantadine plasma bioavailability than conventional immediate-release formulations, which require administration up to three times daily.

Pharmacological interventions for agitated behaviours in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents in the management of agitated behaviours following traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

We performed a search strategy in PubMed, OvidMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Directory of Open Access Journals, LILACS, Web of Science and Prospero (up to 10 December 2018) for published and unpublished evidence on the risks and benefits of 9 prespecified medications classes used to control agitated behaviours following TBI. We included all randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental and observational studies examining the effects of medications administered to control agitated behaviours in TBI patients. Included studies were classified into three mutually exclusive categories: (1) agitated behaviour was the presenting symptom; (2) agitated behaviour was not the presenting symptom, but was measured as an outcome variable; and (3) safety of pharmacological interventions administered to control agitated behaviours was measured.

RESULTS

Among the 181 articles assessed for eligibility, 21 studies were included. Of the studies suggesting possible benefits, propranolol reduced maximum intensities of agitation per week and physical restraint use, methylphenidate improved anger measures following 6 weeks of treatment, valproic acid reduced weekly agitated behaviour scale ratings and olanzapine reduced irritability, aggressiveness and insomnia between weeks 1 and 3 of treatment. Amantadine showed variable effects and may increase the risk of agitation in the critically ill. In three studies evaluating safety outcomes, antipsychotics were associated with an increased duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) in unadjusted analyses. Small sample sizes, heterogeneity and an unclear risk of bias were limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Propranolol, methylphenidate, valproic acid and olanzapine may offer some benefit; however, they need to be further studied. Antipsychotics may increase the length of PTA. More studies on tailored interventions and continuous evaluation of safety and efficacy throughout acute, rehabilitation and outpatient settings are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016033140.

Evaluating ADS5102 (amantadine) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease patients with dyskinesia

Introduction: Amantadine is an old, antiviral compound that moderately ameliorates impaired motor behaviour in Parkinson's disease. Its current resurgence results from the novel retarded release amantadine hydrochloride formulation, ADS5102, which has also received approval for the treatment of levodopa-related involuntary movements known as dyskinesia. Areas covered: This non-systematic, narrative drug evaluation discusses the value of ADS5102 for patients with Parkinson's disease. ADS5102 is orally applied once daily in the evening. This capsule provides higher and more continuous amantadine plasma concentrations than conventional amantadine immediate release formulations with their two to three times daily intake plan. Expert opinion: ADS5102 was superior to placebo in clinical trials. They aimed for the amelioration of motor complications, particularly at 'OFF' periods and with dyskinesia in fluctuating levodopa treated patients with Parkinson's disease. Side effects and tolerability were similar to the well-known effects of conventional amantadine formulations. ADS5102 simplifies treatment and improves compliance problems in the long run. The marketing of ADS5102 outside the US will be complex for return of research costs and investments required for its manufacturing. Indeed, worldwide institutional price regulation scenarios often only consider new therapeutic mode of actions as being innovative as opposed to old drugs with improved pharmacokinetic behaviour.

Stimulant Therapy in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: Prescribing Patterns and Adverse Event Rates at 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Pharmacological stimulant therapies are routinely administered to promote recovery in patients with subacute and chronic disorders of consciousness (DoC). However, utilization rates and adverse drug event (ADE) rates of stimulant therapies in patients with acute DoC are unknown. We aimed to determine the frequency of stimulant use and associated ADEs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute DoC caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with TBI admitted to the ICU at 2 level 1 trauma centers between 2015 and 2018. Patients were included if they were stimulant naive at baseline and received amantadine, methylphenidate, or modafinil during ICU admission. Stimulant dose reduction or discontinuation during ICU admission was considered a surrogate marker of an ADE. Targeted chart review was performed to identify reasons for dose reduction or discontinuation.

RESULTS

Forty-eight of 608 patients with TBI received pharmacological stimulant therapy (7.9%) during the study period. Most patients were diagnosed with severe TBI at presentation (60.4%), although stimulants were also administered to patients with moderate (14.6%) and mild (25.0%) TBI. The median time of stimulant initiation was 11 days post-injury (range: 2-28 days). Median Glasgow Coma Scale score at the time of stimulant initiation was 9 (range: 4-15). Amantadine was the most commonly prescribed stimulant (85.4%) followed by modafinil (14.6%). Seven (14.6%) patients required stimulant dose reduction or discontinuation during ICU admission. The most common ADE resulting in therapy modification was delirium/agitation (n = 2), followed by insomnia (n = 1), anxiety (n = 1), and rash (n = 1); the reason for therapy modification was undocumented in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological stimulant therapy is infrequently prescribed but well tolerated in ICU patients with acute TBI at level 1 trauma centers. These retrospective observations provide the basis for prospective studies to evaluate the safety, optimal dose range, and efficacy of stimulant therapies in this population.