1
|
Ho MH, Lee YW, Wang L. Estimated prevalence of post-intensive care cognitive impairment at short-term and long-term follow-ups: a proportional meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Intensive Care 2025; 15:3. [PMID: 39792310 PMCID: PMC11723879 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-025-01429-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 01/12/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evidence of the overall estimated prevalence of post-intensive care cognitive impairment among critically ill survivors discharged from intensive care units at short-term and long-term follow-ups is lacking. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of the post-intensive care cognitive impairment at time to < 1 month, 1 to 3 month(s), 4 to 6 months, 7-12 months, and > 12 months discharged from intensive care units. METHODS Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO via ProQuest were searched from inception through July 2024. Studies that reported on cognitive impairment among patients discharged from intensive care units with valid measures were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently for all included studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to measure risk of bias. Data on cognitive impairment prevalence were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was pooled estimated proportions of prevalence of the post-intensive care cognitive impairment. RESULTS In total, 58 studies involving 347,940 patients were included. The pooled post-intensive care cognitive impairment prevalence rates at the follow-up timepoints < 1 month, 1-3 month(s), 4-6 months, 7-12 months, > 12 months were 49.8% [95% Prediction Interval (PI), 39.9%-59.7%, n = 19], 45.1% (95% PI, 34.8%-55.5%, n = 23), 47.9% (95% PI, 35.9%-60.0%, n = 16), 28.3% (95% PI, 19.9%-37.6%, n = 19), and 30.4% (95% PI, 18.4%-43.9%, n = 7), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that significant differences of the prevalence rates between continents and study designs were observed. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence rates of post-intensive care cognitive impairment differed at different follow-up timepoints. The rates were highest within the first three months of follow-up, with a pooled prevalence of 49.8% at less than one month, 45.1% at one to three months, and 47.9% at three to six months. No significant differences in prevalence rates between studies that only included coronavirus disease 2019 survivors. These fundings highlight the need for further research to develop targeted interventions to prevent or manage cognitive impairment at short-term and long-term follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu-Hsing Ho
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, 3 Sassoon Road, Academic Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| | - Yi-Wei Lee
- Sijhih Cathay General Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Lizhen Wang
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, 3 Sassoon Road, Academic Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arciniegas DB, Almeida EJ, Sander AM, Bogaards JA, Giacino JT, Hammond FM, Harrison-Felix CL, Hart T, Ketchum JM, Mellick DC, Sherer M, Whyte J, Zafonte RD. Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation in Traumatic Brain Injury With Donepezil: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2024; 37:102-114. [PMID: 39628282 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2025]
Abstract
Memory impairments are common chronic and functionally important consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Among patients with persistent verbal memory impairments due to TBI-related cholinergic deficits, donepezil (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) may improve these and related problems. The Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation in TBI with Donepezil (MEMRI-TBI-D) study, a four-site, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 10-week clinical trial, evaluated the efficacy of donepezil on verbal memory impairments, co-occurring cognitive and noncognitive neuropsychiatric problems, and functional status among persons with severe, persistent, and functionally limiting verbal memory problems at least 6 months after mild, moderate, or severe TBI. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability measures were assessed. Seventy-five participants were randomly assigned to donepezil (N=37) and placebo (N=38) groups. In both modified intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, donepezil significantly improved memory (i.e., verbal learning, as measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Total Trials 1-3, the primary outcome measure) when compared with placebo. Treatment-responder rates in the donepezil and placebo groups were 42% and 18%, respectively, yielding a number needed to treat of 3.5. Among donepezil responders, delayed recall and processing speed also improved significantly. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates for donepezil and placebo were 46% and 8%, respectively, and mild or moderate (85%); diarrhea and nausea were significantly more common in the donepezil group, yielding a number needed to harm of 6.25 and a likelihood to be helped or harmed ratio of 1.79. These results suggest that donepezil is an efficacious treatment for severe, persistent memory impairments after predominantly severe TBI, with a relatively favorable safety and tolerability profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Arciniegas
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Emily J Almeida
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Angelle M Sander
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Jay A Bogaards
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Cynthia L Harrison-Felix
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Tessa Hart
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Jessica M Ketchum
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - David C Mellick
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Mark Sherer
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - John Whyte
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| | - Ross D Zafonte
- Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller AL, Evanson NK, Taylor JM. Use of donepezil for neurocognitive recovery after brain injury in adult and pediatric populations: a scoping review. Neural Regen Res 2024; 19:1686-1695. [PMID: 38103232 PMCID: PMC10960296 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.389628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
There are few pharmacologic options for the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil have been evaluated in adult patients after traumatic brain injury, but relatively less is known about the effect in pediatric populations. The goal of this review is to identify knowledge gaps in the efficacy and safety of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors as a potential adjuvant treatment for neurocognitive decline in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury. Investigators queried PubMed to identify literature published from database inception through June 2023 describing the use of donepezil in young adult traumatic brain injury and pediatric patients with predefined conditions. Based on preselected search criteria, 340 unique papers were selected for title and abstract screening. Thirty-two records were reviewed in full after eliminating preclinical studies and papers outside the scope of the project. In adult traumatic brain injury, we review results from 14 papers detailing 227 subjects where evidence suggests donepezil is well tolerated and shows both objective and patient-reported efficacy for reducing cognitive impairment. In children, 3 papers report on 5 children recovering from traumatic brain injury, showing limited efficacy. An additional 15 pediatric studies conducted in populations at risk for cognitive dysfunction provide a broader look at safety and efficacy in 210 patients in the pediatric age group. Given its promise for efficacy in adults with traumatic brain injury and tolerability in pediatric patients, we believe further study of donepezil for children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery L. Miller
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Nathan K. Evanson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - J. Michael Taylor
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Veen R, Königs M, Bakker S, van Iperen A, Peerdeman S, Bet PM, Oosterlaan J. Pharmacotherapy to Improve Cognitive Functioning After Acquired Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 115:971-987. [PMID: 38294196 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Cognitive impairments, common sequelae of acquired brain injury (ABI), significantly affect rehabilitation and quality of life. Currently, there is no solid evidence-base for pharmacotherapy to improve cognitive functioning after ABI, nevertheless off-label use is widely applied in clinical practice. This meta-analysis and meta-regression aims to quantitatively aggregate the available evidence for the effects of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of cognitive impairments following ABI. We conducted a comprehensive search of Embase, Medline Ovid, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases for randomized controlled and crossover trials. Meta-analytic effects were calculated for each pharmaceutical agent and targeted neuromodulator system. Cognitive outcome measures were aggregated across cognitive domains. Of 8,216 articles, 41 studies (4,434 patients) were included. The noradrenergic agent methylphenidate showed a small, significant positive effect on cognitive functioning in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI; k = 14, d = 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.56, P = 0.003). Specifically, methylphenidate was found to improve cognitive functions related to executive memory, baseline speed, inhibitory control, and variability in responding. The cholinergic drug donepezil demonstrated a large effect size, albeit based on a limited number of studies (k = 3, d = 1.68, P = 0.03). No significant effects were observed for other agents. Additionally, meta-regression analysis did not identify significant sources of heterogeneity in treatment response. Our meta-analysis supports the use of methylphenidate for enhancing cognitive functioning in patients with TBI. Although donepezil shows potential, it warrants further research. These results could guide clinical decision making, inform practice guidelines, and direct future pharmacotherapeutic research in ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud van der Veen
- Follow Me Program & Emma Neuroscience Group, Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Daan Theeuwes Center for Intensive Neurorehabilitation, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Marsh Königs
- Follow Me Program & Emma Neuroscience Group, Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Daan Theeuwes Center for Intensive Neurorehabilitation, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Bakker
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries van Iperen
- Daan Theeuwes Center for Intensive Neurorehabilitation, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Peerdeman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre M Bet
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Oosterlaan
- Follow Me Program & Emma Neuroscience Group, Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part V: Memory. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2023; 38:83-102. [PMID: 36594861 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Memory impairments affecting encoding, acquisition, and retrieval of information after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) have debilitating and enduring functional consequences. The interventional research reviewed primarily focused on mild to severe memory impairments in episodic and prospective memory. As memory is a common focus of cognitive rehabilitation, clinicians should understand and use the latest evidence. Therefore, the INCOG ("International Cognitive") 2014 clinical practice guidelines were updated. METHODS An expert panel of clinicians/researchers reviewed evidence published since 2014 and developed updated recommendations for intervention for memory impairments post-TBI, a decision-making algorithm, and an audit tool for review of clinical practice. RESULTS The interventional research approaches for episodic and prospective memory from 2014 are synthesized into 8 recommendations (6 updated and 2 new). Six recommendations are based on level A evidence and 2 on level B. In summary, they include the efficacy of choosing individual or multiple internal compensatory strategies, which can be delivered in a structured or individualized program. Of the external compensatory strategies, which should be the primary strategy for severe memory impairment, electronic reminder systems such as smartphone technology are preferred, with technological advances increasing their viability over traditional systems. Furthermore, microprompting personal digital assistant technology is recommended to cue completion of complex tasks. Memory strategies should be taught using instruction that considers the individual's functional and contextual needs while constraining errors. Memory rehabilitation programs can be delivered in an individualized or mixed format using group instruction. Computer cognitive training should be conducted with therapist guidance. Limited evidence exists to suggest that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors improve memory, so trials should include measures to assess impact. The use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is not recommended for memory rehabilitation. CONCLUSION These recommendations for memory rehabilitation post-TBI reflect the current evidence and highlight the limitations of group instruction with heterogeneous populations of TBI. Further research is needed on the role of medications and tDCS to enhance memory.
Collapse
|
6
|
Saha G, Chakraborty K, Pattojoshi A. Management of Psychiatric Disorders in Patients with Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury. Indian J Psychiatry 2022; 64:S344-S354. [PMID: 35602363 PMCID: PMC9122169 DOI: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_34_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gautam Saha
- Clinic Brain Neuropsychiatric Institute and Research Center, Barasat, India
| | | | - Amrit Pattojoshi
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, WBUHS, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Florentino SA, Bawany MH, Ma HM. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors to enhance recovery from traumatic brain injury: a comprehensive review and case series. Brain Inj 2022; 36:441-454. [PMID: 35113764 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2034962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) are used off-label, in both adult and pediatric patients, to help further neuro-recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Evidence is limited and piecemeal. This review describes how TBI affects the cholinergic system and consolidates evidence supporting or refuting the use of AChEIs following TBI. METHODS NCBI MEDLINE search included all articles published through March 2021 on AChEI use in acute and post-acute adult TBI rehabilitation (treatment began <90 days or ≥90 days since injury, respectively), and in pediatric TBI rehabilitation. Further, we checked ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials using AChEIs for TBI rehabilitation in the United States. RESULTS 27 original articles from NCBI Medline, published through March 2021, were included. The use of AChEIs following TBI in acute and post-acute rehabilitation settings, in both adult and pediatric patients, along with medication side effects, is discussed. CONCLUSIONS Most studies showed benefits with only moderate effect sizes because of small sample sizes. Reported side effects are minimal and stop soon after AChEIs is discontinued. Conclusions are limited by paucity of research; but fortunately, a large randomized controlled trial is ongoing, and more are needed to truly determine the efficacy of AChEIs in helping with recovery from TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Florentino
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Mohammad H Bawany
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Heather M Ma
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Östberg A, Ledig C, Katila A, Maanpää HR, Posti JP, Takala R, Tallus J, Glocker B, Rueckert D, Tenovuo O. Volume Change in Frontal Cholinergic Structures After Traumatic Brain Injury and Cognitive Outcome. Front Neurol 2020; 11:832. [PMID: 32903569 PMCID: PMC7438550 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The cholinergic nuclei in the basal forebrain innervate frontal cortical structures regulating attention. Our aim was to investigate if cognitive test results measuring attention relate to the longitudinal volume change of cholinergically innervated structures following traumatic brain injury (TBI). During the prospective, observational TBIcare project patients with all severities of TBI (n = 114) and controls with acute orthopedic injuries (n = 17) were recruited. Head MRI was obtained in both acute (mean 2 weeks post-injury) and late (mean 8 months) time points. T1-weighted 3D MR images were analyzed with an automatic segmentation method to evaluate longitudinal, structural brain volume change. The cognitive outcome was assessed with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Analyses included 16 frontal cortical structures, of which four showed a significant correlation between post-traumatic volume change and the CANTAB test results. The strongest correlation was found between the volume loss of the supplementary motor cortex and motor screening task results (R-sq 0.16, p < 0.0001), where poorer test results correlated with greater atrophy. Of the measured sum structures, greater cortical gray matter atrophy rate showed a significant correlation with the poorer CANTAB test results. TBI caused volume loss of frontal cortical structures that are heavily innervated by cholinergic neurons is associated with neuropsychological test results measuring attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Östberg
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku Brain Injury Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Christian Ledig
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ari Katila
- Department of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Henna-Riikka Maanpää
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Jussi P Posti
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku Brain Injury Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Riikka Takala
- Department of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Jussi Tallus
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Ben Glocker
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olli Tenovuo
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku Brain Injury Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.,Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pharmacologic Treatment of Neurobehavioral Sequelae Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Crit Care Nurs Q 2020; 43:172-190. [DOI: 10.1097/cnq.0000000000000301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
10
|
Brain Cholinergic Function and Response to Rivastigmine in Patients With Chronic Sequels of Traumatic Brain Injury: A PET Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2019; 33:25-32. [PMID: 28060207 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) findings and to study whether the cholinergic function differs between respondents to cholinergic medication versus nonrespondents. SETTING Outpatient clinic and university PET imaging center. PARTICIPANTS We studied 17 subjects for more than 1 year after at least moderate traumatic brain injury. Ten of the subjects were respondents and 7 nonrespondents to cholinergic medication. DESIGN Cholinergic function was assessed with [methyl-C] N-methylpiperidyl-4-acetate-PET (C-MP4A-PET), which reflects the activity of the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme. The subjects were PET scanned twice: without medication and after a 4-week treatment with rivastigmine 1.5 mg twice a day. MEASURES Regional cerebral AChE activity was measured with PET. RESULTS At baseline Statistical Parametric Mapping analyses showed significantly lower AChE activity in respondents bilaterally in the frontal cortex as compared with nonrespondents. Region of interest (ROI) analysis revealed that the difference was most pronounced in the lateral frontal cortex (-9.4%, P = .034) and anterior cingulate (-6.0%, P = .049). After rivastigmine treatment, AChE activity was notably lower throughout the cortex in both respondents and nonrespondents, without significant differences between them. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that frontal cholinergic dysfunction is associated with the clinical response to cholinergic stimulation in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Collapse
|
11
|
Holschneider DP, Guo Y, Wang Z, Vidal M, Scremin OU. Positive Allosteric Modulation of Cholinergic Receptors Improves Spatial Learning after Cortical Contusion Injury in Mice. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:2233-2245. [PMID: 30688147 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA), a novel M1 muscarinic-positive allosteric modulator, for improving memory and motor dysfunction after cerebral cortical contusion injury (CCI). Adult mice received unilateral motorsensory cortical CCI or sham injury. Benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA; 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.] × 2/day × 3-4 weeks) or vehicle (Veh) were administered, and weekly evaluations were undertaken using a battery of motor tests, as well as the Morris water maze. Thereafter, cerebral metabolic activation was investigated in awake animals during walking with [14C]-2-deoxygIucose autoradiography, comparing CCI mice previously treated with BQCA (20 mg/kg) or vehicle. Relative changes in local cerebral glucose uptake (rCGU) were evaluated in three-dimensional-reconstructed brains using statistical parametric mapping. CCI resulted in mild hyperactivity in the open field, and modest significant motor deficits, as well as significantly decreased spatial learning at 3 weeks. BQCA in CCI mice resulted in significantly improved spatial recall during the third week, with minimal effects on motor outcomes. CCI significantly decreased rCGU in the ipsilesional basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit and in somatosensory regions, with relative increases noted contralaterally, as well as in the cerebellum. Significant decreases in rCGU were noted in subregions of the ipsilesional hippocampal formation, with significant increases noted contralesionally. BQCA compared to vehicle-treated mice showed modest, though significantly increased, rCGU in motor regions, as well as a partial reversal of lesion-related rCGU findings in subregions of the hippocampal formation. rCGU in ipsilesional posterior CA1 demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with latency to find the submerged platform. BQCA at 20 mg/kg had no significant effect on general motor activity, body weight, or acute motor, secretory, or respiratory symptoms. Results suggest that BQCA is a candidate compound to improve learning and memory function after brain trauma and may not suffer the associated central nervous system side effects typically associated with even modest doses of other cholinergic enhancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Holschneider
- 1 Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,2 Department of Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,3 Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yumei Guo
- 1 Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zhuo Wang
- 1 Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Milagros Vidal
- 1 Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Oscar U Scremin
- 3 Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bondi CO, Yelleswarapu NK, Day-Cooney J, Memarzadeh K, Folweiler KA, Bou-Abboud CE, Leary JB, Cheng JP, Tehranian-DePasquale R, Kline AE. Systemic administration of donepezil attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment on neurobehavioral outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2018; 36:45-57. [PMID: 29439368 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-170781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) donepezil (DON) is recommended as a potential treatment for cognition after clinical traumatic brain injury (TBI) and therefore may be prescribed as an adjunct therapy during rehabilitation. However, a dose-response study evaluating DON after a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury in rats did not reveal cognitive benefits. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the effect of DON on behavioral and histological outcome when combined with environmental enrichment (EE), a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation. It was hypothesized that the combined treatments would produce a synergistic effect yielding improved recovery over neurorehabilitation alone. METHODS Isoflurane-anesthetized adult male rats received a CCI or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing plus systemic injections of DON (0.25 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH; 1.0 mL/kg saline) once daily for 19 days beginning 24 hr after injury. Function was assessed by established motor and cognitive tests on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 19. RESULTS DON was ineffective when administered alone. In contrast, EE conferred significant motor and cognitive benefits, and reduced cortical lesion volume vs. STD (p < 0.05). Combining the therapies weakened the efficacy of rehabilitation as revealed by diminished motor and cognitive recovery in the TBI+EE+DON group vs. the TBI+EE+VEH group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION These data replicate previous findings showing that EE is beneficial and DON is ineffective after CCI and add to the literature a novel and unpredicted finding that supports neither the hypothesis nor the use of DON for TBI. Investigation of other AChEIs after CCI injury is necessary to gain further insight into the value of this therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina O Bondi
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Narayana K Yelleswarapu
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Julian Day-Cooney
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kimiya Memarzadeh
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kaitlin A Folweiler
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carine E Bou-Abboud
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacob B Leary
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Cheng
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Roya Tehranian-DePasquale
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anthony E Kline
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Campbell KA, Kennedy RE, Brunner RC, Hollis SD, Lumsden RA, Novack TA. The effect of donepezil on the cognitive ability early in the course of recovery from traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2018; 32:972-979. [PMID: 29737870 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1468574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of donepezil on cognitive ability in patients who have sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesized that donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, would enhance cognitive recovery beyond that of usual care in an acute rehabilitation facility. METHODS This retrospective, longitudinal analysis included 55 patients who were non-randomly prescribed donepezil during acute care and compared them to 74 patients who received usual rehabilitation treatment. All 129 patients completed neuropsychological assessment at two time points. Donepezil was increased from 5 to 10 mg 7-10 days after initiation and maintained until follow-up cognitive assessment. MAIN OUTCOMES Primary cognitive abilities of interest included processing speed, attention and memory. Cognitive and functional abilities were assessed by a standard neuropsychological battery for TBI. RESULTS Propensity scores were used to adjust for differences between groups. Mixed effect model analysis showed no significant differences between treatment and control groups on all neuropsychological subtests over time. CONCLUSIONS Acute administration of donepezil did not significantly improve measures of cognitive or functional ability beyond that of treatment as usual in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard E Kennedy
- b Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care , University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Robert C Brunner
- c Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Sean D Hollis
- c Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Ross A Lumsden
- c Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Thomas A Novack
- c Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , University of Alabama at Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anghinah R, Amorim RLOD, Paiva WS, Schmidt MT, Ianof JN. Traumatic brain injury pharmacological treatment: recommendations. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2018; 76:100-103. [DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20170196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article presents the recommendations on the pharmacological treatment employed in traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the outpatient clinic of the Cognitive Rehabilitation after TBI Service of the Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. A systematic assessment of the consensus reached in other countries, and of articles on TBI available in the PUBMED and LILACS medical databases, was carried out. We offer recommendations of pharmacological treatments in patients after TBI with different symptoms.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sofuoglu M, DeVito EE, Waters AJ, Carroll KM. Cognitive Function as a Transdiagnostic Treatment Target in Stimulant Use Disorders. J Dual Diagn 2016; 12:90-106. [PMID: 26828702 PMCID: PMC4837011 DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1146383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Stimulant use disorder is an important public health problem, with an estimated 2.1 million current users in the United States alone. No pharmacological treatments are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for stimulant use disorder and behavioral treatments have variable efficacy and limited availability. Most individuals with stimulant use disorder have other comorbidities, most with overlapping symptoms and cognitive impairments. The goal of this article is to present a rationale for cognition as a treatment target in stimulant use disorder and to outline potential treatment approaches. Rates of lifetime comorbid psychiatric disorders among people with stimulant use disorders are estimated at 65% to 73%, with the most common being mood disorders (13% to 64%) and anxiety disorders (21% to 50%), as well as non-substance-induced psychotic disorders (<10%). There are several models of addictive behavior, but the dual process model particularly highlights the relevance of cognitive impairments and biases to the development and maintenance of addiction. This model explains addictive behavior as a balance between automatic processes and executive control, which in turn are related to individual (genetics, comorbid disorders, psychosocial factors) and other (craving, triggers, drug use) factors. Certain cognitive impairments, such as attentional bias and approach bias, are most relevant to automatic processes, while sustained attention, response inhibition, and working memory are primarily related to executive control. These cognitive impairments and biases are also common in disorders frequently comorbid with stimulant use disorder and predict poor treatment retention and clinical outcomes. As such, they may serve as feasible transdiagnostic treatment targets. There are promising pharmacological, cognitive, and behavioral approaches that aim to enhance cognitive function. Pharmacotherapies target cognitive impairments associated with executive control and include cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., galantamine, rivastigmine) and monoamine transporter inhibitors (e.g., modafinil, methylphenidate). Cognitive behavioral therapy and cognitive rehabilitation also enhance executive control, while cognitive bias modification targets impairments associated with automatic processes. Cognitive enhancement to improve treatment outcomes is a novel and promising strategy, but its clinical value for the treatment of stimulant use disorder, with or without other psychiatric comorbidities, remains to be determined in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Sofuoglu
- a Department of Psychiatry , Yale University School of Medicine , West Haven , Connecticut , USA.,b VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven , Connecticut , USA
| | - Elise E DeVito
- a Department of Psychiatry , Yale University School of Medicine , West Haven , Connecticut , USA.,b VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven , Connecticut , USA
| | - Andrew J Waters
- c Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology , Uniformed Services University of the Health Science , Bethesda , Maryland , USA
| | - Kathleen M Carroll
- a Department of Psychiatry , Yale University School of Medicine , West Haven , Connecticut , USA.,b VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven , Connecticut , USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common but accurate diagnosis and defining criteria for mild TBI and its clinical consequences have been problematic. Mild TBI causes transient neurophysiologic brain dysfunction, sometimes with structural axonal and neuronal damage. Biomarkers, such as newer imaging technologies and protein markers, are promising indicators of brain injury but are not ready for clinical use. Diagnosis relies on clinical criteria regarding depth and duration of impaired consciousness and amnesia. These criteria are particularly difficult to confirm at the least severe end of the mild TBI continuum, especially when relying on subjective, retrospective accounts. The postconcussive syndrome is a controversial concept because of varying criteria, inconsistent symptom clusters and the evidence that similar symptom profiles occur with other disorders, and even in a proportion of healthy individuals. The clinical consequences of mild TBI can be conceptualized as two multidimensional disorders: (1) a constellation of acute symptoms that might be termed early phase post-traumatic disorder (e.g., headache, dizziness, imbalance, fatigue, sleep disruption, impaired cognition), that typically resolve in days to weeks and are largely related to brain trauma and concomitant injuries; (2) a later set of symptoms, a late phase post-traumatic disorder, evolving out of the early phase in a minority of patients, with a more prolonged (months to years), sometimes worsening set of somatic, emotional, and cognitive symptoms. The later phase disorder is highly influenced by a variety of psychosocial factors and has little specificity for brain injury, although a history of multiple concussions seems to increase the risk of more severe and longer duration symptoms. Effective early phase management may prevent or limit the later phase disorder and should include education about symptoms and expectations for recovery, as well as recommendations for activity modifications. Later phase treatment should be informed by thoughtful differential diagnosis and the multiplicity of premorbid and comorbid conditions that may influence symptoms. Treatment should incorporate a hierarchical, sequential approach to symptom management, prioritizing problems with significant functional impact and effective, available interventions (e.g., headache, depression, anxiety, insomnia, vertigo).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas I Katz
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Acquired Brain Injury Program, Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital, Braintree, MA, USA.
| | - Sara I Cohen
- Acquired Brain Injury Program, Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital, Braintree, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tufts Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael P Alexander
- Concussion/TBI Program, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Spaulding Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part V. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014; 29:369-86. [DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Impact of pharmacological treatments on cognitive and behavioral outcome in the postacute stages of adult traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2011; 31:745-57. [PMID: 22020351 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318235f4ac] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacological treatments that are administered to adults in the postacute stage after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) (≥4 weeks after injury) have the potential to reduce persistent cognitive and behavioral problems. While a variety of treatments have been examined, the findings have yet to be consolidated, hampering advances in the treatment of TBI. A meta-analysis of research that has investigated the cognitive and behavioral effects of pharmacological treatments administered in the later stage after TBI was therefore conducted. The PubMed and PsycINFO databases were searched, and Cohen d effect sizes, percent overlap, and failsafe N statistics were calculated for each treatment. Both randomized controlled trials and open-label studies (prospective and retrospective) were included. Nineteen treatments were investigated by 30 independent studies, comprising 395 participants with TBI in the treatment groups and 137 control subjects. When treated in the postacute period, 1 dopaminergic agent (methylphenidate) improved behavior (anger/aggression, psychosocial function) and 1 cholinergic agent (donepezil) improved cognition (memory, attention). In addition, when the injury-to-treatment interval was broadened to include studies that administered treatment just before the postacute period, 2 dopaminergic agents (methylphenidate, amantadine) showed clinically useful treatment benefits for behavior, whereas 1 serotonergic agent (sertraline) markedly impaired cognition and psychomotor speed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Arciniegas DB, Frey KL, Newman J, Wortzel HS. Evaluation and Management of Posttraumatic Cognitive Impairments. Psychiatr Ann 2010; 40:540-552. [PMID: 21270968 DOI: 10.3928/00485713-20101022-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Psychiatrists are increasingly called upon to care for individuals with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral disturbances after TBI, especially in settings serving military service personnel and Veterans. In both the early and late post-injury periods, cognitive impairments contribute to disability among persons with TBI and are potentially substantial sources of suffering for persons with TBI and their families. In this article, the differential diagnosis, evaluation, and management of posttraumatic cognitive complaints is reviewed. The importance of pre-treatment evaluation as well as consideration of non-cognitive contributors to cognitive problems and functional limitations is emphasized first. The course of recovery after TBI, framed as a progression through posttraumatic encephalopathy, is reviewed next and used to anchor the evaluation and treatment of posttraumatic cognitive impairments in relation to injury severity as well as time post-injury. Finally, pharmacologic and rehabilitative interventions that may facilitate cognitive and functional recovery at each stage of posttraumatic encephalopathy are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Arciniegas
- Neurobehavioral Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|