Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in a Patient With a Deep Brain Stimulator: A Case Report

Spinal lumbar multimodal neurophysiological monitoring in a patient with deep brain Stimulator: A case report

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is a highly valuable tool in spinal surgery. It allows for real-time evaluation of nervous system function and alerts the surgeon to any warning signs. Among the various techniques used are motor evoked potentials (MEPs) through transcranial electrical stimulation, which involve applying an electrical stimulus to the scalp in the primary motor cortex region and recording it in the corresponding muscles of the corticospinal tract. There are relative contraindications for this technique, such as in patients who have an implantable device. There is no consensus on how to perform this technique in patients with a deep brain stimulator. We present the case of a 61-year-old patient with Parkinson's disease and a deep brain stimulator (DBS), and who underwent spinal surgery for lumbar discopathy. IONM was performed during the procedure using MEPs, necessitating the deactivation of the DBS to protect its function. Upon completion of the surgical procedure, the device was reactivated, confirming its proper function. We demonstrate that this technique can be safe for these patients, weighing the potential risks and benefits. However, it will be necessary to develop specific guidelines for performing these techniques in the future.

Management strategies for patients with neurologic stimulators during nonneurologic surgery: an update and review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to summarize the perioperative management of noncardiac implanted electrical devices (NCIEDs) and update the anesthesiologist on current recommendations for management when a NCIED is encountered during a nonneurosurgical procedure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Indications for NCIEDs continue to expand, and increasing numbers of patients with NCIEDs are presenting for nonneurosurgical procedures. Recent case reports demonstrate that NCIEDs may meaningfully affect perioperative management including use of electrocautery and neuromonitoring. This review highlights the importance of evaluating NCIED function (including lead impedance) prior to surgery, provides an update on the MRI compatibility and safety of these devices, and reviews the management of patients with altered respiratory drive because of vagal nerve stimulators.

SUMMARY

As the prevalence of NCIEDs in patients presenting for surgery increases, anesthesiologists will likely encounter these devices more frequently. To provide a well tolerated anesthetic, anesthesiologists should recognize the concerns associated with NCIEDs and how best to address them perioperatively.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years

INTRODUCTION

Patients with spinal deformities undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent neurological deficit. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows early detection of SCI which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. The primary aim of this literature review was to search if there are threshold values of TcMEP and SSEP in the literature that are widely accepted as alert during IONM. The secondary aim was to update knowledge concerning IONM during scoliosis surgery.

METHOD

PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases were used to search publication from 2012 to 2022. The following keywords were used: evoked potential, scoliosis, surgery, intraoperative monitoring and neurophysiological. We included all studies dealing with SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We included 43 papers. Rates of IONM alert and neurological deficit varied from 0.56 to 64% and from 0.15 to 8.3%, respectively. Threshold values varied from a loss of 50 to 90% for TcMEP amplitude, whereas it seems that a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted for SSEP. Causes of IONM changes most frequently reported were surgical maneuver.

CONCLUSION

Concerning SSEP, a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted as an alert. For TcMEP, it seems that the use of highest threshold values can avoid unnecessary surgical procedure for the patient without increasing risk of neurological deficit.

Deep Brain Stimulation and Microelectrode Recording for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurological disorder in which nigrostriatal pathways involving the basal ganglia experience a decrease in neural activity regarding dopaminergic neurons. PD symptoms, such as muscle stiffness and involuntary tremors, have an adverse impact on the daily lives of those affected. Current medical treatments seek to decrease the severity of these symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the preferred safe, and reliable treatment approach. DBS involves implanting microelectrodes into subcortical areas that produce electrical impulses directly to high populations of dopaminergic neurons. The most common targets are the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and the basal ganglia's globus pallidus pars interna (GPi). Research studies suggest that DBS of the STN may cause a significant reduction in the daily dose of L-DOPA compared to DBS of the GPi. DBS of the STN has suggested that there may be sweet spots within the STN that provide hyper-direct cortical connectivity pathways to the primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). In addition, the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) may be a new target for DBS that helps treat locomotion problems associated with gait and posture. Both microelectrode recording (MER) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used to ensure electrode placement accuracy. Using MER, stimulation of the STN at high frequencies (140<) decreased oscillatory neuronal firing by 67%. This paper investigates methods of intraoperative neuromonitoring during DBS as a form of PD treatment.

Anesthesia for deep brain stimulation: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a rapidly expanding surgical modality for the treatment of patients with movement disorders. Its ability to be adjusted, titrated, and optimized over time has given it a significant advantage over traditional more invasive surgical procedures. Therefore, the success and popularity of this procedure have led to the discovery of new indications and therapeutic targets as well as advances in surgical techniques. The aim of this review is to highlight the important updates in DBS surgery and to exam the anesthesiologist's role in providing optimal clinical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

New therapeutic indications have a significant implication on perioperative anesthesia management. In addition, new technologies like frameless stereotaxy and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to guide electrode placement have altered the need for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and hence increased the use of general anesthesia. With an expanding number of patients undergoing DBS implantation, patients with preexisting DBS increasingly require anesthesia for unrelated surgery and the anesthesiologist must be aware of the considerations for perioperative management of these devices and potential complications.

SUMMARY

DBS will continue to grow and evolve requiring adaptation and modification to the anesthetic management of these patients.