Diagnosing neonatal seizures and status epilepticus

Defining neonatal status epilepticus: A scoping review from the ILAE neonatal task force

OBJECTIVE

To review the available literature concerning the definition of neonatal status epilepticus (SE) and/or seizure burden.

METHODS

The International League Against Epilepsy Neonatal Task Force performed a scoping review of the definitions of neonatal SE. Following a systematic literature review, articles were screened and data were abstracted regarding: (1) article characteristics (author identification, publication year, journal name, digital object identifier, title, objective, and study design); (2) cohort characteristics (sample size, gestational age, seizure etiology); (3) definition of SE and/or seizure burden; and (4) the method used to identify and classify SE, including routine EEG (EEG), continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG), amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), or clinical features.

RESULTS

The scoping review yielded 44 articles containing a definition of neonatal SE. Studies mainly included infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or neonates considered at risk for seizures. SE identification and classification most often relied on cEEG. The majority of studies based the definition of SE on seizure duration, including summed duration of seizures comprising ≥50% of any 1-h epoch, recurrent seizures for >50% of the total recording time, or either electrographic seizures lasting >30 min and/or repeated electrographic seizures totaling >50% in any 1-h period. Seizure burden was reported in 20 studies, and the most commonly used approach assessed total seizure burden, defined as total duration of EEG seizures in minutes. Sixteen studies assessed the relationship between seizure burden and outcomes, and most identified a significant association between higher seizure burden and unfavorable outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE

This scoping review demonstrates a substantial variation in neonatal SE definitions across the literature. The most common definitions were based around a 30-min seizure duration criterion, but evidence was insufficient to support that 30 min was a cutoff defining prolonged seizures or that seizures exceeding this burden were more likely to be pharmacoresistant or associated with worse outcomes. As a next step, the Neonatal Task Force intends to develop a standardized approach to assessing and describing neonatal seizure burden and defining neonatal SE.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Prolonged seizures are a neurologic emergency, if untreated, can lead to permanent injury or death. In adults and children, seizures lasting longer than 30 min are believed to cause brain damage. However, it is not clear if this definition can be applied to neonates. The International League Against Epilepsy Neonatal Taskforce performed a scoping literature review which identified 44 articles containing a definition of neonatal status epilepticus. In this article, the authors reviewed the current used definitions for prolonged seizures in neonates to establish a relationship between seizure duration and neurological outcome. As a next step, the Neonatal Task Force intends to develop a standardized approach to assessing and describing neonatal seizure burden and defining neonatal SE.

Neurological outcomes and mortality after neonatal seizures with electroencephalographical verification. A systematic review

AIM

To conduct a systematic review of post-neonatal neurological outcomes and mortality following neonatal seizures with electroencephalographical verification.

METHODS

The databases Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies. All abstracts were screened in a blinded fashion between research team members and reports found eligible were obtained and screened in full text by two members each. From studies included, outcome results for post-neonatal epilepsy, cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, developmental delay, mortality during and after the neonatal period and composite outcomes were extracted. A quality assessment of each study was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 5518 records were screened and 260 read in full text. Subsequently, 31 studies were included, containing cohorts of either mixed or homogenous etiologies. Follow-up time and gestational ages varied between studies. No meta-analysis could be performed due to the low number of studies with comparable outcomes and effect measures. Reported cumulative incidences of outcomes varied greatly between studies. For post-neonatal epilepsy the reported incidence was 5-84%, for cerebral palsy 9-78%, for intellectual disability 24-67%, for developmental delay 10-67% and for mortality 1-62%. Subgroup analysis had more coherent results and in cohorts with status epilepticus a higher incidence of post-neonatal epilepsy from 46 to 84% was shown.

CONCLUSION

The large variation of reported incidences for neurological outcomes and mortality found even when restricting to cohorts with electroencephalographically verified neonatal seizures indicates selection bias as a significant confounder in existing studies. Population-based approaches are thus warranted to correctly predict outcomes in this group.

Anti-seizure medications for neonates with seizures

BACKGROUND

Newborn infants are more prone to seizures than older children and adults. The neuronal injury caused by seizures in neonates often results in long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae. There are several options for anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in neonates. However, the ideal choice of first-, second- and third-line ASM is still unclear. Further, many other aspects of seizure management such as whether ASMs should be initiated for only-electrographic seizures and how long to continue the ASM once seizure control is achieved are elusive.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess whether any ASM is more or less effective than an alternative ASM (both ASMs used as first-, second- or third-line treatment) in achieving seizure control and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with seizures. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 2. To assess maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy after achieving seizure control. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 3. To assess treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos and three databases in May 2022 and June 2023. These searches were not limited other than by study design to trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included neonates with EEG-confirmed or clinically diagnosed seizures and compared (1) any ASM versus an alternative ASM, (2) maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy, and (3) treatment of clinical or EEG seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and independently extracted data. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 trials (1342 infants) in this review. Phenobarbital versus levetiracetam as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) Phenobarbital is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after first loading dose (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.63 to 3.30; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and after maximal loading dose (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.78 to 4.50; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital when compared to levetiracetam on mortality before discharge (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.52; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), requirement of mechanical ventilation (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.91; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), sedation/drowsiness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.68 to 4.44; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.76; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Phenobarbital versus phenytoin as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) We are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital versus phenytoin on achieving seizure control after maximal loading dose of ASM (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.72; 59 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy in clinically diagnosed neonatal seizures (two trials) We are uncertain about the effect of short-term maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy during the hospital stay (but discontinued before discharge) on the risk of repeat seizures before hospital discharge (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.01; 373 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Maintenance therapy with ASM compared to no maintenance therapy may have little or no effect on mortality before discharge (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.22; 373 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.61; 111 participants; low-certainty evidence), neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.13 to 6.12; 108 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 14.72; 126 participants; low-certainty evidence). Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates (two trials) Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation (MD -1871.16, 95% CI -4525.05 to 782.73; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality before discharge (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.27; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.73; 35 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. We report data from the most important comparisons here; readers are directed to Results and Summary of Findings tables for all comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Phenobarbital as a first-line ASM is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after the first loading dose and after the maximal loading dose of ASM (moderate-certainty evidence). Phenobarbital + bumetanide may have little or no difference in achieving seizure control when compared to phenobarbital alone (low-certainty evidence). Limited data and very low-certainty evidence preclude us from drawing any reasonable conclusion on the effect of using one ASM versus another on other short- and long-term outcomes. In neonates who achieve seizure control after the first loading dose of phenobarbital, maintenance therapy compared to no maintenance ASM may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality before discharge, mortality by 18 to 24 months, neurodevelopmental disability by 18 to 24 months and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). In neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation, all-cause mortality before discharge and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). All findings of this review apply only to term and late preterm neonates. We need well-designed RCTs for each of the three objectives of this review to improve the precision of the results. These RCTs should use EEG to diagnose seizures and should be adequately powered to assess long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. We need separate RCTs evaluating the choice of ASM in preterm infants.

EEG in neonatal seizures: where to look and what to see

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal seizures are frequent and carry a detrimental prognostic outlook. Diagnosis is based on EEG confirmation. Classification has recently changed.

AREAS COVERED

We consulted original papers, book chapters, atlases, and reviews to provide a narrative overview on EEG characteristics of neonatal seizures. We searched PubMed, without time restrictions (last visited: 31 May 2022). Additional papers were extracted from the references list of selected papers. We describe the typical neonatal ictal EEG discharges morphology, location, and propagation, together with age-dependent features. Etiology-dependent electroclinical features, when identifiable, are presented for both acute symptomatic neonatal seizures and neonatal-onset epilepsies and developmental/epileptic encephalopathies. The few ictal variables known to predict long-term outcome have been discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Multimodal neuromonitoring in critically ill newborns, high-density EEG, and functional neuroimaging might increase our insight into the neurophysiological bases of seizures in newborns. Increasing availability of long-term monitoring with conventional video-EEG and automated detection methods will allow clinicians and researchers to gather an ever expanding bulk of clinical and neurophysiological data to enhance accuracy with deep phenotyping. The latest classification proposal represents an input for critically revising our diagnostic abilities with respect to seizure definition, duration, and semiology, possibly further promoting clinical research.

Acute Seizures-Work-Up and Management in Children

Seizures are common in the pediatric population; however, most children do not go on to develop epilepsy later in life. Selecting appropriate diagnostic modalities to determine an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment as well as with counseling families regarding the etiology and prognosis of seizures, is essential. This article will review updated definitions of seizures, including provoked versus unprovoked, as well as the International League Against Epilepsy operational definition of epilepsy. A variety of specific acute symptomatic seizures requiring special consideration are discussed, along with neonatal seizures and seizure mimics, which are common in pediatric populations.

Electroencephalography in neonatal epilepsies

Neonatal epilepsies - neonatal seizures caused by remote symptomatic etiologies - are infrequent compared with those caused by acute symptomatic etiologies. The etiologies of neonatal epilepsies are classified into structural, genetic, and metabolic. Electroencephalography (EEG) and amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) are essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of neonatal epilepsies. Electroencephalography / aEEG findings may differ substantially among infants, even within infants with variants in a single gene. Unusual EEG/aEEG findings, such as downward seizure patterns on aEEG, can be found. Neonatal seizures are exclusively of focal onset. An International League Against Epilepsy task force proposed that the seizure type is typically determined by the predominant clinical feature and is classified into motor or non-motor presentations. Ictal EEG usually demonstrates a sudden, repetitive, evolving, and stereotyped activities with a minimum duration of 10 s. In epileptic spasms and myoclonic seizures, the cut-off point of 10 s cannot be applied. One must always be aware of electro-clinical dissociation in neonates suspected to have seizures. Amplitude-integrated EEG is also useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of neonatal epilepsies but aEEG cannot be recommended as the mainstay because of its relatively low sensitivity and specificity. At present, EEG findings are not pathognomonic, although some characteristic ictal or interictal EEG findings have been reported in several neonatal epilepsies. Deep learning will be expected to be introduced into EEG interpretation in near future. Objective EEG classification derived from deep learning may help to clarify EEG characteristics in some specific cases of neonatal epilepsy.

Investigating and managing neonatal seizures in the UK: an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach

Background

Neonatal seizures are difficult to diagnose and, when they are, tradition dictates first line treatment is phenobarbital. There is little data on how consultants diagnose neonatal seizures, choose when to treat or how they choose aetiological investigations or drug treatments. The purpose of this study was to assess the variation across the UK in the management of neonatal seizures and explore paediatricians’ views on their diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was used (QUAN→QUAL) with equal waiting between stages. We collected quantitative data from neonatology staff and paediatric neurologists using a questionnaire sent to neonatal units and via emails from the British Paediatric Neurology Association. We asked for copies of neonatal unit guidelines on the management of seizures. The data from questionnaires was used to identify16 consultants using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative data, which was triangulated with quantitative questionnaire data.

Results

One hundred questionnaires were returned: 47.7% thought levetiracetam was as, or equally, effective as phenobarbital; 9.2% thought it was less effective. 79.6% of clinicians had seen no side effects in neonates with levetiracetam. 97.8% of unit guidelines recommended phenobarbital first line, with wide variation in subsequent drug choice, aetiological investigations, and advice on when to start treatment. Thematic analysis revealed three themes: ‘Managing uncertainty with neonatal seizures’, ‘Moving practice forward’ and ‘Multidisciplinary team working’. Consultants noted collecting evidence on anti-convulsant drugs in neonates is problematic, and recommended a number of solutions, including collaboration to reach consensus guidelines, to reduce diagnostic and management uncertainty.

Conclusions

There is wide variation in the management of neonatal seizures and clinicians face many uncertainties. Our data has helped reveal some of the reasons for current practice and decision making. Suggestions to improve certainty include: educational initiatives to improve the ability of neonatal staff to describe suspicious events, greater use of video, closer working between neonatologists and neurologists, further research, and a national discussion to reach a consensus on a standardised approach to managing neonatal epileptic seizures.

Seizure Prediction Models in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

PURPOSE

Conventional video-EEG monitoring is required to diagnose seizures accurately in neonates. This tool is resource-intense and has limited availability in many centers. Seizure prediction models could help allocate resources by improving efficiency in which conventional video-EEG monitoring is used to detect subclinical seizures. The aim of this retrospective study was to create a neonate-specific seizure prediction model using clinical characteristics and EEG background findings.

METHODS

We conducted a 3-year retrospective study of all consecutive neonates who underwent conventional video-EEG monitoring at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Variables including age, EEG indication, high-risk clinical characteristics, and EEG background informed seizure prediction models based on a multivariable logistic regression model. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to construct time to first EEG seizure.

RESULTS

Prediction models with clinical variables or background EEG features alone versus combined clinical and background EEG features were created from 210 neonates who met inclusion criteria. The combined clinical and EEG model had a higher area under the curve for combined sensitivity and specificity to 83.0% when compared to the clinical model (76.4%) or EEG model (66.2%). The same trend of higher sensitivity of the combined model was found for time to seizure outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

While both clinical and EEG background features were predictive of neonatal seizures, the combination improved overall prediction of seizure occurrence and prediction of time to first seizure as compared with prediction models based solely on clinical or EEG features alone. With prospective validation, this model may improve efficiency of patient-oriented EEG monitoring.

Predictive factors and prognostic value for status epilepticus in newborns

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the predictive factors for status epilepticus (SE) in neonates and prognostic factors for patient outcomes in newborns suffering either isolated seizures or SE.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study from January 2010 to December 2014, included 91 newborns who had neonatal seizures. Among them, 50 newborns experienced SE and 41 newborns presented isolated seizures only. SE was defined as a single seizure lasting more than 15 min or repeated seizures without return to preictal neurological baseline for more than 15 min. Isolated seizures were defined as one single seizure lasting less than 15 min or more seizures with complete recovery of consciousness between seizures. Perinatal and electroclinical data were recorded. Outcomes were evaluated at one year follow up.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the factors identified as being predictive of SE were a severely abnormal initial neurological examination (OR 15.7, 95% CI (3.8-109) p = 0.00075) and hypoglycaemia (OR 6.8, 95% CI (1.5-49.2) p = 0.024), found mostly in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. When studying our global cohort, SE was found to be a negative prognostic factor for outcome only in univariate analysis. In newborns with isolated seizures only, the postictal clinical examination results were the only independent prognostic factor found, normal results being associated with a more favorable evolution (OR 48.9, 95% CI (7.16-571) p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

Two independent risk factors for SE in newborns have been identified: a severely abnormal initial neurological examination and hypoglycaemia. In newborns with isolated seizures, the only positive prognostic factor was found to be a normal postictal clinical examination.

Diagnosis of seizures and encephalopathy using conventional EEG and amplitude integrated EEG

Seizures are more common in the neonatal period than at any other time of life, partly due to the relative hyperexcitability of the neonatal brain. Brain monitoring of sick neonates in the NICU using either conventional electroencephalography or amplitude integrated EEG is essential to accurately detect seizures. Treatment of seizures is important, as evidence increasingly indicates that seizures damage the brain in addition to that caused by the underlying etiology. Prompt treatment has been shown to reduce seizure burden with the potential to ameliorate seizure-mediated damage. Neonatal encephalopathy most commonly caused by a hypoxia-ischemia results in an alteration of mental status and problems such as seizures, hypotonia, apnea, and feeding difficulties. Confirmation of encephalopathy with EEG monitoring can act as an important adjunct to other investigations and the clinical examination, particularly when considering treatment strategies such as therapeutic hypothermia. Brain monitoring also provides useful early prognostic indicators to clinicians. Recent use of machine learning in algorithms to continuously monitor the neonatal EEG, detect seizures, and grade encephalopathy offers the exciting prospect of real-time decision support in the NICU in the very near future.

What is new: Talk about status epilepticus in the neonatal period

Nowadays, no general consensus was achieved regarding neonatal status epilepticus and its definition. Indeed, different criteria (mainly based on seizure duration) were used. Whereas a recent proposal has been developed to define status epilepticus in older ages, it seems that the peculiar characteristics of neonatal seizures and of the immature brain make difficult to find a tailored definition for this period of life. Achieving a consensus on this entity would mean to make the first step toward a targeted therapeutic strategy of intervention.

[Revelation of the circumstances of the accident vascular arterial ischemic brain in at term or near-term and referral]

The neonatal arterial ischemic stroke is an emergency. Recurrent focal seizures, generally occurring in the first 24-72 hours after birth, are the commonest first clinical signs. When neonatal arterial ischemic stroke is suspected, optimal initial management involves careful supportive care including treatment of clinical and frequent or prolonged subclinical seizures, correction of the possible metabolic disorders and their prevention. Contrary to hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia is not indicated. This newborn requires emergent transfer to a neonatal intensive care unit for the confirmation of the diagnosis by means of a specialized neonatal transport team.

Electrographic Seizures in Preterm Neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

Characterize clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics of preterm neonates undergoing continuous EEG in the neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS

Retrospective study of preterm neonates born less than 37 weeks' gestational age undergoing continuous EEG in the neonatal intensive care unit at Boston Children's Hospital over a 2-year period.

RESULTS

Fifty-two preterms (46% male) had a mean gestational age of 32.8 weeks (standard deviation = 4.17). Seizures were detected in 12/52 (23%), with EEG seizures detected in 4/12 (33%). The median time from EEG to the first seizure was 0.5 hours (interquartile range 0.24-4). Factors associated with seizures were male gender (odds ratio = 4.65 [95% confidence interval = 1.02-21.24], P = .047) and lack of EEG state change (odds ratio = 0.043 [95% confidence interval = 0.005-0.377], P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Twenty-three percent of preterms undergoing continuous EEG had EEG seizures or electrographic seizures with no clear clinical correlate. This confirms recent American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guidelines suggesting that preterm neonates are at high risk for seizures.

Selective head cooling during neonatal seizures prevents postictal cerebral vascular dysfunction without reducing epileptiform activity

Epileptic seizures in neonates cause cerebrovascular injury and impairment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation. In the bicuculline model of seizures in newborn pigs, we tested the hypothesis that selective head cooling prevents deleterious effects of seizures on cerebral vascular functions. Preventive or therapeutic ictal head cooling was achieved by placing two head ice packs during the preictal and/or ictal states, respectively, for the ∼2-h period of seizures. Head cooling lowered the brain and core temperatures to 25.6 ± 0.3 and 33.5 ± 0.1°C, respectively. Head cooling had no anticonvulsant effects, as it did not affect the bicuculline-evoked electroencephalogram parameters, including amplitude, duration, spectral power, and spike frequency distribution. Acute and long-term cerebral vascular effects of seizures in the normothermic and head-cooled groups were tested during the immediate (2-4 h) and delayed (48 h) postictal periods. Seizure-induced cerebral vascular injury during the immediate postictal period was detected as terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling-positive staining of cerebral arterioles and a surge of brain-derived circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood in the normothermic group, but not in the head-cooled groups. During the delayed postictal period, endothelium-dependent cerebral vasodilator responses were greatly reduced in the normothermic group, indicating impaired CBF regulation. Preventive or therapeutic ictal head cooling mitigated the endothelial injury and greatly reduced loss of postictal cerebral vasodilator functions. Overall, head cooling during seizures is a clinically relevant approach to protecting the neonatal brain by preventing cerebrovascular injury and the loss of the endothelium-dependent control of CBF without reducing epileptiform activity.

Monitoring of newborns at high risk for brain injury

Due to the increasing number of surviving preterm newborns and to the recognition of therapeutic hypothermia as the current gold standard in newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, there has been a growing interest in the implementation of brain monitoring tools in newborns at high risk for neurological disorders.Among the most frequent neurological conditions and presentations in the neonatal period, neonatal seizures and neonatal status epilepticus, paroxysmal non-epileptic motor phenomena, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, white matter injury of prematurity and stroke require specific approaches to diagnosis. In this review we will describe the characteristics, aims, indications and limitations of routinely available diagnostic techniques such as conventional and amplitude-integrated EEG, evoked potentials, cranial ultrasound and brain MRI. We will conclude by briefly outlining potential future perspectives from research studies.

Pediatric epilepsy following neonatal seizures symptomatic of stroke

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are a risk factor for later epilepsy and their etiology is known to be implicated in the outcome but, little is known about this issue in the subgroup of seizures symptomatic of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to describe the long term risk of epilepsy after electroencephalographic confirmed neonatal seizures symptomatic of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke.

DESIGN/SUBJECT

Fifty-five patients with electroclinical ictal data, vascular territory confirmed by neuroimaging and a minimum follow up of 3.5 years were identified from a multi-centre prospective neonatal seizures registry. Primary outcome was occurrence of post-neonatal epilepsy. The association of outcome with family history of epilepsy, gender, location of the infarct, neonatal clinical and electroencephalogram data were also studied.

RESULTS

During a mean follow up of 8 years and 5 months, 16.4% of the patients developed post neonatal epilepsy. The mean age at first post neonatal seizure was 4 years and 2 months (range 1-10 years and 6 months). Location of the infarct was the only statistically significant risk factor (p=0.001); epilepsy was more represented in males but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal seizures symptomatic of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke had lower risk and later onset of post-neonatal epilepsy, compared to seizures described in the setting of other perinatal brain insults. Our data have implications for counseling to the family at discharge from neonatal intensive care unit.

Early electrographic seizures, brain injury, and neurodevelopmental risk in the very preterm infant

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of very preterm (VPT) infants have shown a wide range of seizure prevalence and association with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), white matter injury (WMI), and death. However, the impact of seizures on neurodevelopment is not well known. We hypothesized that seizures in the first 3 d after VPT birth would be associated with increased radiographic brain injury and later neurodevelopmental risk.

METHODS

For 72 h after birth, 95 VPT infants underwent amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram monitoring. High and low seizure burdens were related to radiographic brain injury, death in the neonatal period, and children's Bayley III (Bayley Scales of Infant Development) performance at 2 y corrected age in a subgroup of 59 infants.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of seizures in this sample was 48%. High seizure burden was associated with increased risk of IVH on day 1; IVH, WMI, and death on day 2; and high-grade IVH on day 3. The presence of seizures on any day was associated with decreased language performance at age 2, even after controlling for family social risk.

CONCLUSION

Seizures during the first 3 d after birth are common and are associated with an increased risk of IVH, WMI, and death. They were also associated with poorer early language development.

Neonatal seizures: advances in mechanisms and management

Seizures occur in approximately 1 to 5 per 1000 live births and are among the most common neurologic conditions managed by a neonatal neurocritical care service. There are several, age-specific factors that are particular to the developing brain, which influence excitability and seizure generation, response to medications, and impact of seizures on brain structure and function. Neonatal seizures are often associated with serious underlying brain injury such as hypoxia-ischemia, stroke, or hemorrhage. Conventional, prolonged, continuous video electroencephalogram is the gold standard for detecting seizures, whereas amplitude-integrated EEG is a convenient and useful bedside tool.