Alternative sites for intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerves X and XII during intracranial surgeries

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring and Mapping in Children Undergoing Brainstem Surgery

SUMMARY

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during surgery for brainstem lesions is a challenge for intraoperative neurophysiologists and surgeons. The brainstem is a small structure packed with vital neuroanatomic networks of long and short pathways passing through the brainstem or originating from it. Many central pattern generators exist within the brainstem for breathing, swallowing, chewing, cardiovascular regulation, and eye movement. During surgery around the brainstem, these generators need to be preserved to maintain their function postoperatively. This short review presents neurophysiologic and neurosurgical experiences of brainstem surgery in children.

Utility of Dual Monitoring of the Lower Cranial Nerve Motor-Evoked Potentials Threshold Level Criterion to Predict Swallowing Function in Skull Base and Brainstem Surgery

PURPOSE

Evaluate the value of bilateral final/baseline threshold level changes of lower cranial nerve MEPs in postoperative swallowing function deterioration prediction.

METHODS

Bilateral lower cranial nerve motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded in 51 patients who underwent treatment for skull base and brainstem tumors. Corkscrew-like electrodes were positione 2 cm below C3/C4 and Cz. The MEPs were recorded from different muscle groups, including the posterior pharyngeal wall muscle, tongue muscle, genioglossus muscle, and cricothyroid muscle through paired needle electrodes. Swallowing function was assessed clinically using the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability score before and after the procedure at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months.

RESULTS

Bilateral final/baseline threshold level increases in lower cranial nerve MEPs under the dual monitoring were significantly correlated with postoperative swallowing function deterioration ( r = 0.660 at 7 days, r = 0.735 at 1 month, and r = 0.717 at 3 months; p < 0.05). Bilateral final/baseline threshold level changes of more than 20% were recorded in 23 of the 51 patients, with 21 patients experiencing swallowing function deterioration postoperatively. The other 28 patients had bilateral threshold level changes of less than 20%, with 26 patients maintaining or improving their swallowing function, and 12 of those patients presented transient deterioration of swallowing function in the early postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual monitoring of lower cranial nerves and their different muscle groups MEPs was a safe and effective way to predict postoperative swallowing function. An increase in bilateral final/baseline threshold level change of more than 20% was predictive of permanent swallowing deterioration, especially in patients with poor swallowing function preoperatively.

Monitoring cerebellopontine angle and skull base surgeries

Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgery represents a challenge for neurosurgeons due to the high risk of iatrogenic injury of vital neurological structures. Therefore, important efforts in improving the surgical techniques and intraoperative neurophysiology have been made in the last decades. We present a description and review of the available methodologies for intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping during CPA surgeries. There are three main groups of techniques to assess the functional integrity of the nervous structures in danger during these surgical procedures: (1) Electrical identification or mapping of motor cranial nerves (CNs), which is essential in order to locate the nerve in their different parts during the tumor resection; (2) Monitoring, which provides real-time information about functional integrity of the nervous tissue; and (3) Brainstem reflexes including blink reflex, masseteric reflex, and laryngeal adductor reflex. All these methods facilitate the removal of lesions and contribute to notable improvement in functional outcome and permit on the investigation of their physiopathology in certain neurosurgically treated diseases. Such is the case of hemifacial spasm (HFS). We describe the methodology to evaluate the efficacy of microvascular decompression for HFS treatment at the end of this chapter.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Hypoglossal Nerve Using Hypoglossal Motor Evoked Potential in Infratentorial Tumor Surgery: A Report of Two Cases

The hypoglossal nerve (CN XII) may be placed at risk during posterior fossa surgeries. The use of intraoperative monitoring (IOM), including the utilization of spontaneous and triggered electromyography (EMG), from tongue muscles innervated by CN XII has been used to reduce these risks. However, there were few reports regarding the intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) of hypoglossal nerve from the tongue muscles. For this reason, we report here two cases of intraoperative hypoglossal MEP monitoring in brain surgery as an indicator of hypoglossal deficits. Although the amplitude of the MEP was reduced in both patients, only in the case 1 whose MEP was disappeared demonstrated the neurological deficits of the hypoglossal nerve. Therefore, the disappearance of the hypoglossal MEP recorded from the tongue, could be considered a predictor of the postoperative hypoglossal nerve deficits.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia

PURPOSE

To evaluate if adding cranial nerves (CNs) V and VI to standard intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) of microvascular decompressions for glossopharyngeal neuralgia improve its efficacy.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who received a microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia at our institution between January 2008 and August 2012. All received upper extremity somatosensory evoked potentials, brainstem auditory evoked potentials, and free-running electromyography of muscles innervated by ipsilateral CNs VII, IX, and X. The sample was divided into 12 patients who received additional monitoring of CNs V and VI and 15 who did not.

RESULTS

No difference on neurotonic activity presence was found on CN V (standard IONM: 0% versus additional CNs IONM: 8.33%; p = 0.423), CN VI (never present on the additional CN patients), CN VII (standard IONM: 73.33% versus additional CNs IONM: 66.64%; p = 0.973), CN IX (standard IONM: 40.0% versus additional CNs IONM: 25.0%; p = 0.683), or CN X (standard IONM: 46.67% versus additional CNs IONM: 33.33%; p = 0.701) between groups. Additionally, no differences of brainstem auditory evoked potentials wave V's delay, and amplitude at the end of the decompression, or closing of the case were found between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring free-running electromyography of additional CNs V and VI does not improve the efficacy of IONM of microvascular decompressions for glossopharyngeal neuralgia.