Comparing neuronal and behavioral thresholds for spiral motion discrimination

Attention to visual motion suppresses neuronal and behavioral sensitivity in nearby feature space

Background

Feature-based attention prioritizes the processing of the attended feature while strongly suppressing the processing of nearby ones. This creates a non-linearity or “attentional suppressive surround” predicted by the Selective Tuning model of visual attention. However, previously reported effects of feature-based attention on neuronal responses are linear, e.g., feature-similarity gain. Here, we investigated this apparent contradiction by neurophysiological and psychophysical approaches.

Results

Responses of motion direction-selective neurons in area MT/MST of monkeys were recorded during a motion task. When attention was allocated to a stimulus moving in the neurons’ preferred direction, response tuning curves showed its minimum for directions 60–90° away from the preferred direction, an attentional suppressive surround. This effect was modeled via the interaction of two Gaussian fields representing excitatory narrowly tuned and inhibitory widely tuned inputs into a neuron, with feature-based attention predominantly increasing the gain of inhibitory inputs. We further showed using a motion repulsion paradigm in humans that feature-based attention produces a similar non-linearity on motion discrimination performance.

Conclusions

Our results link the gain modulation of neuronal inputs and tuning curves examined through the feature-similarity gain lens to the attentional impact on neural population responses predicted by the Selective Tuning model, providing a unified framework for the documented effects of feature-based attention on neuronal responses and behavior.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-022-01428-7.

A metric-based analysis of the contribution of spike timing to contrast and motion direction coding by single neurons in macaque area MT

Spike timing is thought to contribute to the coding of motion direction information by neurons in macaque area MT. Here, we examined whether spike timing also contributes to the coding of stimulus contrast. We applied a metric-based approach to spike trains fired by MT neurons in response to stimuli that varied in contrast, or direction. We assessed the performance of three metrics, D(spike) and D(product) (containing spike count and timing information), and the spike count metric D(count). We analyzed responses elicited during the first 200 msec of stimulus presentation from 205 neurons. For both contrast and direction, the large majority of neurons showed the highest mutual information using D(spike), followed by D(product), and D(count). This was corroborated by the performance of a theoretical observer model at discriminating contrast and direction using the three metrics. Our results demonstrate that spike timing can contribute to contrast coding in MT neurons, and support previous reports of its potential contribution to direction coding. Furthermore, they suggest that a combination of spike count with periodic and non-periodic spike timing information (contained in D(spike), but not in D(product) and D(count) which are insensitive to spike counts and timing respectively) provides the largest coding advantage in spike trains fired by MT neurons during contrast and direction discrimination.