Factors Affecting the Healing of Pressure Ulcers in a Korean Acute Care Hospital

Clinical Presentation and Integrated Management of Pressure Injuries in the Emergency Hospital Setting: A Plastic Surgeon's Perspective

Background: Pressure injuries are localized areas of tissue damage or necrosis that occur when pressure is applied to the skin for prolonged periods, often over bony prominences, often the sacrum, heels, ischial tuberosities, and greater trochanters. The pathophysiology is complex, involving a combination of mechanical forces, ischemia, and tissue hypoxia. Methods: We conducted a 2-year retrospective study aiming to assess the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and management of pressure injuries in patients admitted to an emergency hospital who underwent a plastic surgery examination. Results: This study included 176 patients with clinically diagnosed pressure ulcers, with findings showing 28.52% of cases as stage III and 35.57% as stage IV. Common sites included the sacrum (40.94%), ischium (15.1%), and heel (14.43%). The median patient age was 76 years, with 47.15% between 60 and 80 years and 36.93% ≥ 80 years, often presenting with comorbidities increasing the risk of pressure injuries, such as cardiovascular disease (71.59%), diabetes (18.18%) and obesity (9.66%). Important risk factors included neurological diseases (46.02%), spinal cord injuries (14.7%), and nutritional deficiencies, as indicated by anemia (10.43g/dL; 95% CI [10.04; 10.82]), low serum albumin (2.56 g/dL; 95% CI [2.43; 2.69]) and proteins (5.54 g/dL; 95% CI [5.34; 5.73]). Mortality was significant, at 36.93%, with 23.3% occurring within the first 7 days of hospitalization due to the patients' critical condition. Decision-making for surgical intervention considered the patient's general status, comorbidities, and ulcer severity. Surgical treatment consisted of seriate debridement, negative pressure vacuum therapy, and/or coverage using skin grafting, local advancement, or rotation flaps. Conclusions: The key question for a plastic surgeon to consider is how pressure ulcers should be managed. Various debridement and covering techniques should be tailored to the wound's characteristics, considering patient comorbidities and general health condition.

Randomized Clinical Evaluation of the Healing Activity of Green Propolis Ointment in Individuals with Lower Limb Ulcers Resulting from Leprosy: Preliminary Results of a Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: Treating chronic wounds incurs substantial costs for Brazil's Unified Health System. Natural compounds, particularly propolis, are increasingly explored as low-cost alternatives due to their healing properties. Brazilian green propolis, distinct in its chemical composition, has garnered scientific interest. This study aimed to assess the healing effects of green propolis ointment on lower-limb ulcers from leprosy. Methods: A blinded, randomized clinical trial included 18 wounds in two groups: propolis ointment (G1) and control (G2), with evaluations conducted weekly for 61 days. Wound progress was monitored using morphometry and the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). Results: No participants exhibited sensitivity to the propolis. G1 showed significant initial healing: average wound area reduction (%) for G1 vs. G2 included 56.38 vs. 6.13-p < 0.001 (week 1); 79.51 vs. 24.16-p = 0.022 (week 4); and 84.33 vs. 39.73-p = 0.051 (week 7). In G1, the PUSH scores decreased from the beginning, whereas in G2, reductions were observed after three weeks. By week 5, 71.4% of G1 wounds scored below eight points, versus 33.3% in G2. G1 wounds exhibited a reduced area and exudate, as well as revitalized granulation tissue without adverse effects. Conclusions: The findings suggest that green propolis ointment is safe, supports tissue repair and may offer cost-effective treatment benefits. Standard wound dressings are selected to support all healing stages, with an emphasis on antimicrobial action, hemostasis to reduce exudate, and pain-reducing and non-irritant properties. Green propolis ointment meets these criteria, offering a cost-effective treatment that accelerates lesion reduction and encouraging leprosy patients to follow the therapeutic regimen.

Everyday Prevention: The Impact of Daily Comprehensive Skin Assessments on Pressure Injury Healing in the General ICU

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of daily versus weekly comprehensive skin assessments on wound healing status in patients with pressure injuries (PIs) treated in the general ICU.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study was conducted at a foundation hospital from November 15, 2022, to March 15, 2023. The sample consisted of 193 patients with PIs who met the inclusion criteria. The Braden Scale, Nutritional Risk Scale 2002 (NRS-2002), and Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) were used. The intervention group (n = 98) underwent comprehensive skin assessment every day, whereas the control group (n = 95) followed routine procedures. The study findings were reported according to TREND (Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs) guidelines.

RESULTS

Patients were older adults, with a mean age of 70 ± 15.45 years in the intervention group and 71 ± 13.20 years in the control group. The mean NRS-2002 score was 3 ± 2.01 in the intervention group and 2 ± 1.38 in the control group. Medical device-related PI incidence was high in both groups (intervention: 36.8%, control: 24.5%). In the intervention (14.3%) and control (50%) groups, PIs developed mostly due to antiembolic stockings. Deep-tissue PIs were the most common (intervention: 56.8%, control: 62.2%). The last PUSH scores decreased in both groups. The difference between the PUSH scores of the intervention and control groups was statistically significant (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate the critical role of daily comprehensive skin assessment in the healing process of PIs. Especially in ICUs, the study provides compelling evidence for the need to prioritize and implement regular skin assessments to prevent PIs and support the healing process.

Retrospective study on the factors influencing the severity of pressure injuries among intensive care unit patients

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the factors of pressure injuries in patients in intensive care units (ICU).

BACKGROUND

Pressure injuries among patients in ICUs can be prevented by the early assessment of risk factors and taking appropriate preventative measures.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

METHODS

ICU patients who suffered from pressure injuries between January 2016 and August 2018 at a hospital in Taiwan were selected. Patient medical histories and data associated with pressure injuries and medical treatment were collected from electronic medical records. A total of 256 patients were included in our analysis. The study adhered to the STROBE checklist.

RESULTS

A multivariate model of multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that when compared to Stage 1 pressure injuries, Stage 2-4 pressure injuries were associated with albumin levels. Patients with lower albumin levels were at greater odds of Stage 2-4 pressure injuries than Stage 1 pressure injuries. In addition, when compared to unstageable pressure injuries or deep tissue injuries, Stage 1 pressure injuries were associated with the use of fentanyl and haemoglobin levels. Patients using fentanyl were more likely to suffer from unstageable pressure injuries, and those with lower haemoglobin levels were more likely to suffer from unstageable pressure injuries or deep tissue injuries.

CONCLUSION

When patients were simultaneously on ventilators and taking midazolam or fentanyl, the incidence of pressure injuries with greater severity became higher. Furthermore, ICU patients with lower albumin and haemoglobin levels were more likely to suffer from pressure injuries of greater severity.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

For critically ill patients on ventilators, it is recommended to devise a means of assessing each patient daily as well as systematically reduce their dosage of midazolam or fentanyl. Furthermore, regularly monitoring albumin and haemoglobin levels to understand their nutritional status is necessary.

A Prospective Study of Pressure Injury Healing Rate and Time and Influencing Factors in an Acute Care Setting

OBJECTIVE

To determine pressure injury (PI) healing rate and time and identify influencing factors.

METHODS

A prospective cohort research design was used. Data collection was performed between May 2015 and August 2018. The study participants were 77 inpatients who developed at least one PI during their stay in a university hospital. Researchers assessed participants' demographic (age, sex); physical (incontinence, activity of daily living, and nutrition status); physiologic (serum total protein, albumin, and creatinine, blood glucose, and hemoglobin levels); and disease- (diagnosis, number of comorbidities, and cardiovascular comorbidity), wound- (PI stage and size at first detection, and Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing score), and treatment-related (IV nutrition supply and albumin infusion) factors.

RESULTS

Across the 77 patients, 91 PIs developed. Of these, 54 (59.3%) healed with a mean healing time of 17.63 days. The healing rate was better, and the healing time was shorter for stage 2 PIs compared with unstageable or deep-tissue PIs. Factors influencing PI healing rate were number of comorbidities, cardiovascular comorbidity, incontinence, PI stage at first detection, IV nutrition supply, and mean serum creatinine level. Factors influencing PI healing time were number of comorbidities, cardiovascular comorbidity, and PI stage at first detection.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce hospital stays, PI-related complications, and mortality, evidence-based management strategies for PIs are needed. The findings of the present study may contribute to the development of such strategies.

Best Practices in Pressure Injury Treatment

Pressure injury treatments are tailored to the characteristics of the wound. Wound depth, exudate, presence of infection, and patient goals of care will guide appropriate dressing and treatment selection. The interprofessional team, patient, and family should collaborate to create a plan of care for wound healing.

Retrospective Cohort Observational Study on the Single Best Perforator-Based Pacman Flap in the Reconstruction of Stage IV Sacral Region Pressure Ulcers

Introduction  Single best perforator-based Pacman flap (SBPBPF) fortifies the advancement and transposition flap biogeometry principles with robust blood supply of perforator flaps to provide cover for the sacral pressure sore of any dimension. This article describes the biogeometry and technique of raising the SBPBPF. Aim  To assess the outcomes of reconstruction of stage IV sacral pressure sore using the SBPBPF. Materials and Methods  A preliminary cadaver study was done in 24 gluteal specimens in fresh cadavers to determine the anatomical details of perforators of the perisacral region. From 2015 to 2017, 42 myelopathic patients (40 males and 2 females; quadriparetic n = 2 and paraplegic/paraparetic n = 40) underwent SBPBPF reconstruction of stage IV sacral pressure sore. Their documents were analyzed in this retrospective study. All were followed-up for an average period of 12.5 months. Results  Cadaver study revealed significant perforators arising from seven different source vessels in the perisacral region. In the clinical study, average size of the paddle harvested was 168 cm ² on a single best perforator. On an average, the size of the single best perforator harvested with the flap was 1.5 mm. None had early failures of flaps. Thirty-nine patients had well-settled flaps at the end of follow-up period except three (7%) who developed late recurrence due to loss of compliance with offloading instructions. Two experienced mild collections (flap complication rate was 4.76%) in the immediate postoperative period that healed uneventfully. The overall complication rate was 11.9%. Conclusion  SBPBPF is an excellent addendum to reconstructive tool for stage IV sacral pressure sores.

Potential prognostic factors for delayed healing of common, non-traumatic skin ulcers: A scoping review

Healing of non-traumatic skin ulcers is often suboptimal. Prognostic tools that identify people at high risk of delayed healing within the context of routine ulcer assessments may improve this, but robust evidence on which factors to include is lacking. Therefore, we scoped the literature to identify which potentially prognostic factors may warrant future systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE and Embase to identify studies in English published between 1997 and 2017 that tested the association between healing of the three most common non-traumatic skin ulcers encountered by health care professionals (venous leg, diabetic foot, and pressure ulcers) and patient characteristics, ulcer characteristics, and results from clinical investigations. We included 42 studies that investigated factors which may be associated with the healing of venous leg ulcers (n = 17), diabetic foot ulcers (n = 15), and pressure ulcers (n = 10). Across ulcer types, ulcer characteristics were most commonly reported as potential prognostic factors for healing (n = 37), including the size of the ulcer area (n = 29) and ulcer duration at first assessment (n = 16). A total of 35 studies investigated the prognostic value of patient characteristics (n = 35), including age (n = 31), gender (n = 30), diabetes (n = 22), smoking status (n = 15), and history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (n = 13). Of these studies, 23 reported results from clinical investigations as potential prognostic factors, with the majority regarding vessel quality. Age, gender, diabetes, smoking status, history of DVT, ulcer area, and ulcer duration at time of first assessment warrant a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify their prognostic value for delayed ulcer healing.

[Factors Predicting the Interface Pressure Related to Pressure Injury in Intensive Care Unit Patients]

PURPOSE

Interface pressure is a factor that contributes to the occurrence of pressure injuries. This study aimed to investigate interface pressure at common sites of pressure injury (occipital, gluteal and peritrochanteric areas), to explore the relationships among risk factors, skin condition and interface pressure, and to identify risk factors influencing interface pressure.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled at a tertiary teaching hospital in Korea. Interface pressure was recorded by a scanning aid device (PalmQ). Patient data regarding age, pulmonary disease, Braden Scale score, body mass index, serum albumin, hemoglobin, mean blood pressure, body temperature, and oxygen saturation were included as risk factors. Data collected from July to September 2016 were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

The mean interface pressure of the occipital, gluteal, and right and left peritrochanteric areas were 37.96 (±14.90), 41.15 (±16.04), 53.44 (±24.67), and 54.33 (±22.80) mmHg, respectively. Predictive factors for pressure injuries in the occipital area were age ≥70 years (OR 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19~9.98), serum albumin deficit (OR 2.88, 95% CI: 1.00~8.26) and body temperature ≥36.5℃ (OR 3.12, 95% CI: 1.17~8.17); age ≥70 years (OR 2.81, 95% CI: 1.10~7.15) in the right peritrochanteric area; and body temperature ≥36.5℃ (OR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.17~6.98) in the left peritrochanteric area.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that old age, hypoalbuminemia, and high body temperature may be contributory factors to increasing interface pressure; therefore, careful assessment and nursing care of these patients are needed to prevent pressure injury. Further studies are needed to establish cutoff values of interface pressure for patients with pressure ulcers.

Prospective study on Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis and its Severity instrument for verifying its ability to predict the development of pressure ulcers in patients with fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence with loose stools is a risk factor for skin damage that may develop into a pressure ulcer (PU). The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying the Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis and its Severity (IADS) instrument to patients with fecal incontinence as a tool to predict PU development. This prospective study enrolled 120 intensive care unit patients with bowel incontinence of Bristol Stool type 5, 6, and 7. Trained nurses evaluated IADS scores and the occurrence of PUs daily for 7 days. Patients with higher IADS scores were significantly more likely to develop a PU (odds ratio = 1·22, 95% confidence interval = 1·12-1·33). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the area under curve to be 0·790, suggesting that higher IADS scores are associated with an increased likelihood of developing a PU (sensitivity 72·5%, specificity 71·2%, using a cut-off value of 8/9). Our results suggest that the IADS instrument can serve as a tool for predicting the occurrence of PUs in patients with fecal incontinence. Patients with IADS scores that exceed eight points should be classified as being at risk of developing a PU, and placed under intensive care as a proactive measure to prevent PU development.

What is the healing time of Stage II pressure ulcers? Findings from a secondary analysis

Pressure ulcers (PrUs) remain a concern for clinicians, patients, caregivers, and researchers. Although data on prevalence and incidence are available, as well as evidence-based prevention and management intervention, PrU healing time is underreported.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the healing time of Stage II PrUs.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of data collected from a multicenter randomized clinical trial was undertaken. Patients (a) with a Stage II PrU, (b) older than 18 years, and (c) who had given informed consent were included. The endpoints of the study were complete re-epithelialization of the PrU measured with the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing Tool 3.0 and the healing time. A network of 46 healthcare centers located in northern Italy participated in the study.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy patients with an average age of 83.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.71-85.10) were recruited. Among 270 Stage II PrUs included, 153 lesions healed (56.7%), whereas 74 (27.4%) were still present after 10 weeks of follow-up. For 43 lesions (15.9%), the follow-up evaluation was interrupted because of patient death or transfer to units not included in the study. The PrUs healed on an average of 22.9 days (95% CI, 20.47-25.37 days), with a median of 18 days. The average healing time for PrUs of less than 3.1 cm was significantly shorter (19.2 days; 95% CI, 16.6-21.8) compared with those 3.1 cm or greater (31.0 days; 95% CI, 26.4-35.6 days) (P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve complete re-epithelialization in Stage II PrUs, it takes approximately 23 days. This is quite a long time if we consider that pressures of only 60 to 70 mm Hg for between 30 and 240 minutes are needed to cause tissue damage. On average, a small ulcer heals 12 days faster compared with those with a surface of 3.1 cm or greater.

Nutrition-related status and granulation tissue colour of pressure ulcers evaluated by digital image analysis in older patients

OBJECTIVE

Granulation tissue colour may be an indicator for nutritional assessment in pressure ulcer (PU) care. This study evaluated the relationship between nutritional status, anaemia and diabetes, and granulation tissue colour of PUs by colour analysis of digital photographs in the clinical setting.

METHOD

The cross-sectional study included 42 older patients with 51 full-thickness PUs from 10 institutions. Patient demographics, wound status, nutritional status and dietary intakes were obtained from medical charts. From a wound image, the granulation red index was processed by computer software and the proportion of pixels exceeding the threshold intensity of 80 for the granulation tissue surface (%GRI80) was calculated.

RESULTS

Haemoglobin levels were positively associated with %GRI80 levels (p=0.007) in the crude model, but not in the adjusted model (p=0.260). The interaction term between diabetes and protein intake was significantly associated with %GRI80 levels in the adjusted models (p=0.010). At protein intakes of 0.95 g/kg or higher, diabetic wounds exhibited lower %GRI80 levels than non-diabetic wounds (p=0.002). At protein intakes of less than 0.95 g/kg, %GRI80 levels did not differ between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (p=0.247). Protein intakes of 0.95 g/kg or higher were associated with higher %GRI80 levels in non-diabetic patients (p=0.015), but not in diabetic patients (p=0.127).

CONCLUSION

Granulation tissue colour, evaluated by the objective and quantitative analysis of digital photography, is related to haemoglobin level, diabetes and dietary intakes in clinical settings.

Low serum albumin level as an independent risk factor for the onset of pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients

Critically ill patients are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers (PUs) and patients who develop PUs remain significantly longer in the intensive care unit (ICU) with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the identification of patients at truly increased risk is important. The aim of this study was to examine the association of low serum albumin present at admission in ICU patients with the onset of PUs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 610 patients who were admitted to intensive care unit. Level of serum albumin and other biochemical indices, recorded at the time of admission, were collected. We collected information about PU occurrence after admission and conducted a statistical analysis with biomarkers at ICU admission and during hospital stay. The incidence of PU in the ICUs was 31% and about 70% of patients with PUs had hypoalbuminemia at admission. The lowest values of serum albumin in patients with PUs were directly proportional to the severity of ulcers. In this study, we found a close association between serum albumin and PUs. In fact serum albumin was negatively correlated with PU and may be considered one of the independent determinants of PU occurrence in patients admitted to ICUs.