Prevalence of multiple antipsychotic use and associated adverse effects in Australians with mental illness

Polypharmacy in antipsychotic pharmacological treatment among patients with dual diagnosis in Denmark

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is prevalent, however literature on antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment among patients with dual diagnosis is largely non-existent. This study aims to investigating the extent of antipsychotic polypharmacy dual diagnosis patients during hospitalisations.

METHODS

Utilizing cohort data from an integrated dual diagnosis in-patient facility from patients hospitalized between 1 March 2012, to 31 December 2016, we compared the mean antipsychotic medication administered at admission and discharge and examined covariate associations with logistic regressions.

RESULTS

The study identified 907 hospital admissions, of which 641 were the first for each patient during the period. At admission, 74.1% received antipsychotics; polypharmacy spanned psychiatric disorders. categories. Patients with affective or personality spectrum disorders were less likely to have antipsychotic polypharmacy upon admission compared to those with psychosis spectrum disorders. 2013-2016 admissions presented less polypharmacy than 2012. Mean antipsychotic numbers remained unchanged for >30-day hospitalizations. Patients admitted without antipsychotic polypharmacy with an affective spectrum disorder or aged 41-50 or over 51 years old were less likely to be discharged with antipsychotic polypharmacy when compared to patients with psychosis spectrum disorder or aged 18-30 years old.

CONCLUSION

Approximately three-quarters of admitted patients were treated with antipsychotic medication. Antipsychotic polypharmacy was observed across all psychiatric disorder categories, indicating potential off-label use. Addressing antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment is challenging, even for specialised facilities. Rational antipsychotic prescribing, deprescribing protocols, and further prescription pattern research are needed.

Maintenance Therapy of Psychosis Spectrum Disorders in a Real-World Setting: Antipsychotics Prescription Patterns and Long-Term Benzodiazepine Use

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy of patients with primary psychosis spectrum disorders (PSD) in the Western Balkans has received limited interest so far. The present study aimed to investigate long-term prescription patterns among outpatients with PSD.

METHODS

Information about prescription of antipsychotics (AP), benzodiazepines (BZD) and other psychotropic medication over a 6-month period was collected from outpatients (n = 134; ICD-10 diagnosis F20-29) recruited by a larger multi-site study, to find mean daily number of psychotropic drugs, AP prescription patterns (including AP daily dose, route of administration, monotherapy vs. polypharmacy) and BZD utilization (long-term add-on BZD therapy). Additionally, sex-differences in the variables were explored.

RESULTS

Clinically stable outpatients (age 41.7 ± 11.0; male 62.7%; duration of untreated illness 12.7 ± 8.7 years; mean number of lifetime hospitalizations 2.6 ± 0.7) were prescribed 2.8 ± 1.1 psychotropic medications daily. The mean 6-month AP dose was 14.2 ± 7.8 mg olanzapine equivalents. Long-acting injectable AP was prescribed to 25.2% of the patients. Long-term AP monotherapy was found in 52.7% patients and most of them were prescribed second generation AP (65.2%). Long-term AP polypharmacy (42.7%) was more common in males (p = 0.015). The most frequent co-prescription patterns were first generation AP plus clozapine. The highest rate of long-term AP co-prescription was found for BZD (in 42.7% cases, average 6-months daily dose of 2.8 ± 2.7 mg lorazepam equivalents) and anticholinergics (33.6%).

CONCLUSION

Existing appropriately designed interventions aiming to safely switch the inappropriate therapeutic regimens, i.e. very high prevalence of long-term AP polypharmacy and non-rational BZD co-prescription, should be implemented in the region of Western Balkans.

Barriers to medication adherence for rural patients with mental disorders in eastern China: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Mental disorders are destructive and usually require long-term medication, but non-adherence of medication is highly prevalent in patients with mental disorders. Previous studies relating to medication non-adherence were mainly quantitative. Meanwhile, there have been even fewer studies conducted in rural areas in China that focused on patients' medication non-adherence. This study aims to explore the barriers to medication adherence for rural patients with mental disorders in China from the perspectives of patients, patients' family members and healthcare providers.

METHODS

A qualitative study was carried out in the rural areas of four towns within Shandong Province in eastern China. The study adheres to COREQ guidelines. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 patients, 21 family members and 8 primary mental health service providers.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis generated five major themes: (1) lack of self-insight, (2) inadequate family support, (3) long treatment duration and side effects of drugs, (4) poor economic conditions, and (5) the perceived stigma of illness.

CONCLUSION

These findings may be useful for policymakers and planners to improve medication adherence and decrease the recurrence rate of mental disorders in China.

Exploring the Health Status of People with First-Episode Psychosis Enrolled in the Early Intervention in Psychosis Program

People diagnosed with mental disorders are at risk of developing physical health co-morbidities. An exploratory "within-subject" and "between-group" design examined the health outcomes of a group diagnosed with first-episode psychosis enrolled in an early intervention in psychosis program over 12 months. The findings were compared with a group diagnosed with psychosis for more than two years. Participants with first-episode psychosis recorded a significant increase in weight over 12 months when assessed against the comparison group. The findings show that the potential for developing physical health co-morbidities begins from the time of diagnosis and commencement of antipsychotic medications.

Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and Metabolic Syndrome in Schizophrenia: A Review of Systematic Reviews

(Reprinted with permission from BMC Psychiatry (2018) 18:275).

Sex differences in text-mined possible adverse drug events associated with drugs for psychosis

BACKGROUND

Understanding sex differences in adverse drug reactions to drugs for psychosis could potentially guide clinicians in optimal drug choices.

AIMS

By applying a text-mining approach, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between drugs for psychosis and biological sex differences in frequencies and co-occurrences of potential adverse drug events (ADEs).

METHODS

Electronic patient records of a psychiatric population (1427 men and 727 women) were text mined for potential ADEs. The relative risk of experiencing specific ADEs and co-occurrence of ADEs were calculated for each sex.

RESULTS

Findings included 55 potential ADEs with significantly different frequencies between the two sexes. Of these, 20 were more frequent in men, with relative risks of 1.10-7.64, and 35 were more frequent in women, with relative risks of 1.19-21.58. Frequent potential ADEs were psychiatric symptoms, including sexual dysfunction and disturbances in men, and gastrointestinal symptoms, suicidal and self-injurious behaviour and hyperprolactinemia-related events in women. Mention of different hyperprolactinemia-related ADEs often co-occurred in female patients but not in male patients.

CONCLUSION

Several known sex-related ADEs were identified, as well as some previously not reported. When considering the risk-benefit profile of drugs for psychosis, the patient's sex should be considered.

Changes in Prescription of Psychotropic Drugs After Introduction of Polypharmacy Reduction Policy in Japan Based on a Large-Scale Claims Database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In Japan, polypharmacy reduction policy, which reduces the reimbursement of medical cost, was introduced to address unnecessary psychotropic polypharmacy. The rule was applied to the prescriptions of three or more anxiolytics or three or more hypnotics in the policy introduced in 2012. The prescriptions of four or more antidepressants or four or more antipsychotics were added to the rule in the policy revised in 2014. Furthermore, the prescriptions of three or more drugs of anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, or antipsychotics were subject to the reduction criteria of the policy revision in 2016. Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZs) are classified both into anxiolytics and hypnotics, and the reduction rule was not applied to the category of BZs before April 2018. This study aimed to examine the effect of the policy on the prescriptions of four drug categories as well as BZs from the point of view of the number of drugs and doses.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study using a large-scale Japanese health insurance claims database. Patients who were prescribed at least one psychotropic drug (anxiolytic, hypnotic, antidepressant, or antipsychotic) during the study period (from April 2011 to March 2017) were selected. Segmented regression analysis was used to analyze the proportions of patients with three or more or four or more drugs as well as patients above clinically recommended doses, and the means of the average daily doses by drug category.

RESULTS

A total of 312,167 patients were identified as a study population. The proportions of patients with three or more drugs in anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics significantly decreased after the introduction or revisions of the policy, but not BZs. The proportions of patients with three or more drugs in March 2017 were 0.9%, 2.0%, 1.2%, 2.4%, and 8.9% in anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and BZs, respectively. The effect of the policy in reducing the proportions of patients above clinically recommended doses was identified in antipsychotics after the revision in 2016, but not identified in the sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics as well as BZs after the revision in 2014, and antidepressants after the revision in 2016. The proportions of monotherapy were increased from April 2011 to March 2017 only for antidepressants (76.9% → 80.8%) and antipsychotics (79.8% → 82.1%), and not changed or decreased for anxiolytics (85.2% → 85.7%), hypnotics (78.6% → 77.6%), sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics (68.1% → 65.7%), BZs (68.0% → 67.3%), and sum of psychotropic drugs (52.1% → 49.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The polypharmacy reduction policy reduced the proportions of patients with three or more drugs in four drug categories, but not BZs. Only limited effects were seen for reducing the proportions of patients above clinically recommended doses. The policy was revised in April 2018 again. Further investigation is needed to examine the effect of the revision in 2018.

The Prevalence and Factors Associated With Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in a Forensic Psychiatric Sample

Despite clinical guidelines limiting the use of multiple concomitant antipsychotics to the most exceptional and treatment resistant cases, the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy has been increasing worldwide. There has been minimal research investigating the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy in forensic psychiatric samples and the correlates associated with antipsychotic polypharmacy. This cross-sectional study aimed to establish the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy in a forensic psychiatric inpatient sample and to investigate the demographical, clinical, and forensic factors associated with polypharmacy. All patients (N = 142) were prescribed at least one antipsychotic at the time of the study. Antipsychotic polypharmacy was prescribed to 54.93% of patients. Logistic regression results indicated increased length of hospitalization, high/medium security level, treatment with clozapine, and depot antipsychotic prescription were predictive of being placed on an antipsychotic polypharmacy regimen. The results suggest that those who are prescribed multiple antipsychotics are long stay patients who present with higher clinical complexity. The results from this study can be used to inform clinical practice leaders about the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy in a forensic psychiatric institution. More research is needed to understand the clinical justifications for prescribing multiple antipsychotics in a forensic psychiatric sample and ways to safely reduce the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy.

Polypharmacy in a hospitalized psychiatric population: risk estimation and damage quantification

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy increases the risk of pharmacological interactions, prevalence of secondary effects and with this the lack of adherence to treatment. It is estimated that between 10 and 40% of patients hospitalized in psychiatric institutions are prescribed more than one antipsychotic. The objective of the present study was to identify the prevalence of polypharmacy, evaluate adverse effects associated to the use of psych drugs and to estimate the risk in specific groups.

METHODS

We carried out a longitudinal, retrospective study that included the analysis of all discharged patients (n = 140) in the first trimester of the year in a psychiatric hospital in Mexico. The information was classified into 7 sections: sociodemographic, diagnosis, clinical follow-up information, prescribed drugs, adverse reactions, substance abuse, laboratory and complementary results. Risk estimation was obtained with Odds Ratios, to correlate continuous variables Pearson's correlation was used. Student's T and Mann Whitney's U were used to compare 2 independent samples; multiple and linear regressions were carried out.

RESULTS

The mean number of drugs used during hospitalization was 7.8 drugs per patient. The mean prescribed psych drugs was 4.07. The mean antipsychotic dose was the risperidone equivalent of 5.08 mg. 29.2% of patients had at least one secondary effect associated to the use of drugs, 17.8% presented extrapyramidal symptoms. 81.4% of patients were prescribed 6 or more drugs (polypharmacy) and were 5 times more likely to suffer a secondary effects (OR 6.24). 14.2% had polypharmacy while receiving antipsychotics and had more than twice the risk of presenting extrapyramidal symptoms (OR 3.05). For each added psych drug, hospital stay increased by 6.56 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite international guideline recommendations where reasoned and conciliatory prescription of psych drugs is advised, there is still a high prevalence of polypharmacy in patients hospitalized in psychiatric institutions. In the present study 4 out of 5 patients received polypharmacy decreasing tolerability, treatment adherence and increasing the risk and costs secondary to an increased hospital stay.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy and metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia: a review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence on the association between antipsychotic polypharmacy and metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia. We conducted a review of published systematic reviews to evaluate evidence on the association between metabolic syndrome (diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia) and exposure to antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia.

METHODS

We searched five electronic databases, complemented by reference screening, to find systematic reviews that investigated the association of antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia with hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidaemia. Selection of reviews, data extraction and review quality were conducted independently by two people and disagreements resolved by discussion. Results were synthesised narratively.

RESULTS

We included 12 systematic reviews, which reported heterogeneous results, mostly with narrative syntheses and without pooled data. The evidence was rated as low quality. There was some indication of a possible protective effect of drug combinations including aripiprazole for diabetes and hyperlipidaemias, compared to other combinations and/or monotherapy. Only one review reported the association between APP and hypertension. The most frequently reported combinations of medication included clozapine, possibly representing a sample of patients with treatment resistant illness. No included review reported results separately by setting (primary or secondary care).

CONCLUSIONS

Further robust studies are needed to elucidate the possible protective effect of aripiprazole. Long-term prospective studies are required for accurate appraisal of diabetes risk, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in patients exposed to antipsychotic polypharmacy.

Less Medication Use in Inpatients With Severe Mental Illness Receiving a Multidisciplinary Lifestyle Enhancing Treatment. The MULTI Study III

Besides having an unhealthy lifestyle contributing to premature mortality, inpatients with severe mental illness (SMI) use high dosages of medication. Previous research has shown improved health after lifestyle improvements in SMI. In addition, we aimed to retrospectively study whether a multidisciplinary lifestyle enhancing treatment (MULTI) was associated with changes in medication use after 18 months, as compared with patients that continued treatment as usual (TAU) and explored mediation by a change in physical activity. We conducted an observational study within a cohort of inpatients with SMI, who received MULTI (N = 65) or continued TAU (N = 49). Data on their somatic and psychotropic medications were collected, converted into defined daily dose (DDD), and analyzed using linear multilevel regression, correcting for baseline value and differences between groups in age, diagnosis, and illness severity. Compared with TAU, the DDD for psychotropic medication significantly decreased with MULTI (B = -0.55, P = 0.02). Changes in total activity did not mediate this association, suggesting that multiple components of MULTI contributed. Corrected between-group analyses for subgroups of medication were not possible due to lack of power and skewed distributions. Within-group data showed a decreased proportion of users as well as median DDD in both groups for almost all medications. In addition to previously reported health improvements after 18 months of MULTI, we observed a significant decrease in dose of psychotropic medication in MULTI compared to TAU. This first study evaluating a wide range of medications indicates a possible effect of lifestyle improvements on medication use in inpatients with SMI. Findings need to be confirmed in future controlled studies, however.

International trends in antipsychotic use: A study in 16 countries, 2005-2014

The objective of this study was to assess international trends in antipsychotic use, using a standardised methodology. A repeated cross-sectional design was applied to data extracts from the years 2005 to 2014 from 16 countries worldwide. During the study period, the overall prevalence of antipsychotic use increased in 10 of the 16 studied countries. In 2014, the overall prevalence of antipsychotic use was highest in Taiwan (78.2/1000 persons), and lowest in Colombia (3.2/1000). In children and adolescents (0-19 years), antipsychotic use ranged from 0.5/1000 (Lithuania) to 30.8/1000 (Taiwan). In adults (20-64 years), the range was 2.8/1000 (Colombia) to 78.9/1000 (publicly insured US population), and in older adults (65+ years), antipsychotic use ranged from 19.0/1000 (Colombia) to 149.0/1000 (Taiwan). Atypical antipsychotic use increased in all populations (range of atypical/typical ratio: 0.7 (Taiwan) to 6.1 (New Zealand, Australia)). Quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine were most frequently prescribed. Prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use varied markedly between countries. In the majority of populations, antipsychotic utilisation and especially the use of atypical antipsychotics increased over time. The high rates of antipsychotic prescriptions in older adults and in youths in some countries merit further investigation and systematic pharmacoepidemiologic monitoring.