1
|
Trask L, Ward NA, Tarpey R, Beatty R, Wallace E, O'Dwyer J, Ronan W, Duffy GP, Dolan EB. Exploring therapy transport from implantable medical devices using experimentally informed computational methods. Biomater Sci 2024; 12:2899-2913. [PMID: 38683198 DOI: 10.1039/d4bm00107a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Implantable medical devices that can facilitate therapy transport to localized sites are being developed for a number of diverse applications, including the treatment of diseases such as diabetes and cancer, and tissue regeneration after myocardial infraction. These implants can take the form of an encapsulation device which encases therapy in the form of drugs, proteins, cells, and bioactive agents, in semi-permeable membranes. Such implants have shown some success but the nature of these devices pose a barrier to the diffusion of vital factors, which is further exacerbated upon implantation due to the foreign body response (FBR). The FBR results in the formation of a dense hypo-permeable fibrous capsule around devices and is a leading cause of failure in many implantable technologies. One potential method for overcoming this diffusion barrier and enhancing therapy transport from the device is to incorporate local fluid flow. In this work, we used experimentally informed inputs to characterize the change in the fibrous capsule over time and quantified how this impacts therapy release from a device using computational methods. Insulin was used as a representative therapy as encapsulation devices for Type 1 diabetes are among the most-well characterised. We then explored how local fluid flow may be used to counteract these diffusion barriers, as well as how a more practical pulsatile flow regimen could be implemented to achieve similar results to continuous fluid flow. The generated model is a versatile tool toward informing future device design through its ability to capture the expected decrease in insulin release over time resulting from the FBR and investigate potential methods to overcome these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Trask
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Biomechanics Research Centre (BMEC), Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Niamh A Ward
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Biomechanics Research Centre (BMEC), Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ruth Tarpey
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CÚRAM, Centre for Research in Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Rachel Beatty
- Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- SFI Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research Centre (AMBER), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eimear Wallace
- Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Joanne O'Dwyer
- Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - William Ronan
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Biomechanics Research Centre (BMEC), Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Garry P Duffy
- Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- SFI Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research Centre (AMBER), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- CÚRAM, Centre for Research in Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Eimear B Dolan
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Biomechanics Research Centre (BMEC), Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- CÚRAM, Centre for Research in Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tol MC, de Bont DFA, Boon WPC, de Koning EJP, van Apeldoorn AA. Preferred Islet Delivery Device Characteristics and Implantation Strategies of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11077. [PMID: 37908676 PMCID: PMC10614671 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Islet delivery devices (IDDs) offer potential benefits for islet transplantation and stem cell-based replacement in type 1 diabetes. Little is known about patient preferences regarding islet delivery device characteristics and implantation strategies. Patient preferences for IDDs and implantation strategies remain understudied. We invited patients, parents and caregivers to fill in an online questionnaire regarding IDDs. An online survey gathered responses from 809 type 1 diabetes patients and 47 caregivers. We also assessed diabetes distress in a subgroup of 412 patients. A significant majority (97%) expressed willingness to receive an IDD. Preferred IDD attributes included a 3.5 cm diameter for 37.7% of respondents, while when provided with all options, 30.4% found dimensions unimportant. Respondents were open to approximately 4 implants, each with a 5 cm incision. Many favored a device functioning for 12 months (33.4%) or 24 months (24.8%). Younger participants (16-30) were more inclined to accept a 6 months functional duration (p < 0.001). Functional duration outweighed implant quantity and size (p < 0.001) in device importance. This emphasizes patients' willingness to accommodate burdens related to IDD features and implantation methods, crucial for designing future beta cell replacement strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten C. Tol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- LUMC Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Denise F. A. de Bont
- Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter P. C. Boon
- Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Eelco J. P. de Koning
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- LUMC Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Aart A. van Apeldoorn
- Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Lighthouse Biomedical B.V., Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Assessing the Effects of VEGF Releasing Microspheres on the Angiogenic and Foreign Body Response to a 3D Printed Silicone-Based Macroencapsulation Device. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13122077. [PMID: 34959358 PMCID: PMC8704798 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Macroencapsulation systems have been developed to improve islet cell transplantation but can induce a foreign body response (FBR). The development of neovascularization adjacent to the device is vital for the survival of encapsulated islets and is a limitation for long-term device success. Previously we developed additive manufactured multi-scale porosity implants, which demonstrated a 2.5-fold increase in tissue vascularity and integration surrounding the implant when compared to a non-textured implant. In parallel to this, we have developed poly(ε-caprolactone-PEG-ε-caprolactone)-b-poly(L-lactide) multiblock copolymer microspheres containing VEGF, which exhibited continued release of bioactive VEGF for 4-weeks in vitro. In the present study, we describe the next step towards clinical implementation of an islet macroencapsulation device by combining a multi-scale porosity device with VEGF releasing microspheres in a rodent model to assess prevascularization over a 4-week period. An in vivo estimation of vascular volume showed a significant increase in vascularity (* p = 0.0132) surrounding the +VEGF vs. −VEGF devices, however, histological assessment of blood vessels per area revealed no significant difference. Further histological analysis revealed significant increases in blood vessel stability and maturity (** p = 0.0040) and vessel diameter size (*** p = 0.0002) surrounding the +VEGF devices. We also demonstrate that the addition of VEGF microspheres did not cause a heightened FBR. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the combination of VEGF microspheres with our multi-scale porous macroencapsulation device, can encourage the formation of significantly larger, stable, and mature blood vessels without exacerbating the FBR.
Collapse
|