Human embryos cultured in vitro to 14 days

The modeling of human implantation and early placentation: achievements and perspectives

BACKGROUND

Successful implantation is a critical step for embryo survival. The major losses in natural and assisted human reproduction appeared to occur during the peri-implantation period. Because of ethical constraints, the fascinating maternal-fetal crosstalk during human implantation is difficult to study and thus, the possibility for clinical intervention is still limited.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review highlights some features of human implantation as a unique, ineffective and difficult-to-model process and summarizes the pros and cons of the most used in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro models. We point out the variety of cell line-derived models and how these data are corroborated by well-defined primary cells of the same nature. Important aspects related to the handling, standardization, validation, and modus operandi of the advanced 3D in vitro models are widely discussed. Special attention is paid to blastocyst-like models recapitulating the hybrid phenotype and HLA profile of extravillous trophoblasts, which are a unique yet poorly understood population with a major role in the successful implantation and immune mother-embryo recognition. Despite raising new ethical dilemmas, extended embryo cultures and synthetic embryo models are also in the scope of our review.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the electronic database PubMed from inception until March 2024 by using a multi-stage search strategy of MeSH terms and keywords. In addition, we conducted a forward and backward reference search of authors mentioned in selected articles.

OUTCOMES

Primates and rodents are valuable in vivo models for human implantation research. However, the deep interstitial, glandular, and endovascular invasion accompanied by a range of human-specific factors responsible for the survival of the fetus determines the uniqueness of the human implantation and limits the cross-species extrapolation of the data. The ex vivo models are short-term cultures, not relevant to the period of implantation, and difficult to standardize. Moreover, the access to tissues from elective terminations of pregnancy raises ethical and legal concerns. Easy-to-culture cancer cell lines have many limitations such as being prone to spontaneous transformation and lacking decent tissue characteristics. The replacement of the original human explants, primary cells or cancer cell lines with cultures of immortalized cell lines with preserved stem cell characteristics appears to be superior for in vitro modeling of human implantation and early placentation. Remarkable advances in our understanding of the peri-implantation stages have also been made by advanced three dimensional (3D) models i.e. spheroids, organoids, and assembloids, as placental and endometrial surrogates. Much work remains to be done for the optimization and standardization of these integrated and complex models. The inclusion of immune components in these models would be an asset to delineate mechanisms of immune tolerance. Stem cell-based embryo-like models and surplus IVF embryos for research bring intriguing possibilities and are thought to be the trend for the next decade for in vitro modeling of human implantation and early embryogenesis. Along with this research, new ethical dilemmas such as the moral status of the human embryo and the potential exploitation of women consenting to donate their spare embryos have emerged. The careful appraisal and development of national legal and ethical frameworks are crucial for better regulation of studies using human embryos and embryoids to reach the potential benefits for human reproduction.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

We believe that our data provide a systematization of the available information on the modeling of human implantation and early placentation and will facilitate further research in this field. A strict classification of the advanced 3D models with their pros, cons, applicability, and availability would help improve the research quality to provide reliable outputs.

A comparison of culture and cooling for the short term preservation of in vivo derived dromedary camel embryos of varying morphological quality

Despite recent advancements in the cryopreservation of dromedary camel embryos, widespread application of the technique is still limited by the need for specialised vitrification equipment and supplies. Temporary, liquid-phase embryo storage methods provide a useful tool for short-term preservation of camel embryos. In the current study, we compared the use of in vitro embryo culture with cold liquid storage in order to maintain both high- (Grade 1- Excellent and 2-Good) and low- (Grade 3- Moderate and 4-Poor) morphological grade Day-7 dromedary camel embryos in vitro for up to 3 days. Embryos were either cooled and placed in Hams-F10 medium supplemented with HEPES and 10% FBS and then kept at 4 °C; or placed in Hams-F10 supplemented with sodium bicarbonate and 10% FBS and then cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 6% CO2 at 37 °C before being assessed for viability at 24 h. In high-morphological grade embryos, both cold storage and culture supported 100% viability (maintenance of normal morphology) over this period (Cooled n = 22, Cultured n = 20). In low-morphological grade embryos, culture supported higher viability (16/18, 88.9%) than did cooling (4/18, 22.2%). We then evaluated the effect of up to 3 days of cold storage or culture on embryo morphological grade, diameter, and developmental competence following embryo transfer. High-grade embryos were divided between culture and cold storage; low-grade embryos were evaluated only after culture. Over 3 days of culture, both high- and low-grade embryos tended to either maintain or improve upon their initial morphological score (P < 0.05) and increased in diameter (P < 0.001). Embryos subjected to cooling tended to have reduced morphological scores by 48 h of storage and decreased in diameter by 72 h (P < 0.05). No significant influence of storage method (cooling vs. culture), duration (24-72 h), or embryo grade (high vs low) was observed on pregnancy establishment at Day-60 (22.2%-57.2% pregnancy rates for all treatments). Overall, rates of pregnancy establishment were similar for transferred cultured (n = 45) and cooled (n = 45) embryos (pregnancy rates at Day 18, 48% vs 51.1%; at Day 60, 37.7% vs 37.7%). Rates of embryonic loss also were similar (22.7% vs 26%). In conclusion, whilst similar rates of pregnancy and pregnancy loss were observed following the transfer of both cooled and cultured embryos held in vitro for up to 3 days, amongst the two methods, only embryo culture appears to provide a means of effectively preserving Day- 7 dromedary camel embryos with reduced morphological values in vitro. Considering these embryos appear to show poor tolerance to the cooling procedure and are unlikely candidates for vitrification, embryo culture may provide an effective method for deriving pregnancies from low-morphological grade embryos when immediate transfer is not possible on the day of flushing.

The artificial uterus: on the way to ectogenesis

The inability to support the growth and development of a mature fetus up to delivery results in significant human suffering. Current available solutions include adoption, surrogacy, and uterus transplantation. However, these options are subject to several ethical, religious, economic, social, and medical concerns. Ectogenesis is the process in which an embryo develops in an artificial uterus from implantation through to the delivery of a live infant. This current narrative review summarizes the state of recent research focused on human ectogenesis. First, a literature search was performed to identify published reports of previous experiments and devices used for embryo implantation in an extracorporeally perfused human uterus. Furthermore, studies fitting that aim were selected and critically evaluated. Results were synthesized, interpreted, and used to design a prospective strategy for future research. Therefore, this study suggests that full ectogenesis might be obtained using a computer-controlled system with extracorporeal blood perfusion provided by a digitally controlled heart-lung-kidney system. From a clinical perspective, patients who will derive significant benefits from this technology are mainly those women diagnosed with anatomical abnormalities of the uterus and those who have undergone previous hysterectomies, numerous abortions, and experienced premature birth. Ectogenesis is the complete development of an embryo in an artificial uterus. It represents the solutions for millions of women suffering from premature deliveries, and the inability to supply growth and development of embryos/fetuses in the womb. In the future, ectogenesis might replace uterine transplantation and surrogacy.

Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate

Since the early 1980's, with the clinical advent of in vitro fertilization resulting in so-called "test tube babies," a wide array of ethical considerations and concerns regarding artificial womb technology (AWT) have been described. Recent breakthroughs in the development of extracorporeal neonatal life support by means of AWT have reinitiated ethical interest about this topic with a sense of urgency. Most of the recent ethical literature on the topic, however, pertains not to the more imminent scenario of a physiologically improved method of neonatal care through AWT, but instead to the remote scenario of "complete ectogenesis" that imagines human gestation occurring entirely outside of the womb. This scoping review of the ethical literature on AWT spans from more abstract concerns about complete ectogenesis to more immediate concerns about the soon-to-be-expected clinical life support of what we term the fetal neonate or fetonate. Within an organizing framework of different stages of human gestational development, from conception to the viable premature infant, we discuss both already identified and newly emerging ethical considerations and concerns regarding AWT and the care of the fetonate.

The unknown human trophectoderm: implication for biopsy at the blastocyst stage

Trophectoderm biopsy is increasingly performed for pre-implantation genetic testing of aneuploidies and considered a safe procedure on short-term clinical outcome, without strong assessment of long-term consequences. Poor biological information on human trophectoderm is available due to ethical restrictions. Therefore, most studies have been conducted in vitro (choriocarcinoma cell lines, embryonic and pluripotent stem cells) and on murine models that nevertheless poorly reflect the human counterpart. Polarization, compaction, and blastomere differentiation (e.g., the basis to ascertain trophectoderm origin) are poorly known in humans. In addition, the trophectoderm function is poorly known from a biological point of view, although a panoply of questionable and controversial microarray studies suggest that important genes overexpressed in trophectoderm are involved in pluripotency, metabolism, cell cycle, endocrine function, and implantation. The intercellular communication system between the trophectoderm cells and the inner cell mass, modulated by cell junctions and filopodia in the murine model, is obscure in humans. For the purpose of this paper, data mainly on primary cells from human and murine embryos has been reviewed. This review suggests that the trophectoderm origin and functions have been insufficiently ascertained in humans so far. Therefore, trophectoderm biopsy should be considered an experimental procedure to be undertaken only under approved rigorous experimental protocols in academic contexts.

Adapting the 14-day rule for embryo research to encompass evolving technologies

We consider the scientific evidence that research on in-vitro development of embryos beyond 14 days is necessary. We then examine potential new developments in the use of stem cells to make embryoids or synthetic human entities with embryo-like features, and consider whether they also require legal control. Next, we consider the arguments advanced against extending the 14-day period during which research on human embryos is currently permitted, and find none of them to be convincing. We end by proposing a new objective limit that could serve as a mechanism for regulating the use of embryos for research in vitro.